Department Regulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary, 44287-44305 [2013-17066]

Download as PDF Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 141 July 23, 2013 Part XIII Department of Transportation sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Semiannual Regulatory Agenda VerDate Mar<15>2010 00:06 Jul 23, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44288 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary 14 CFR Chs. I–III 23 CFR Chs. I–III Purpose Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact Persons Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 33 CFR Chs. I and IV Background 46 CFR Chs. I–III 48 CFR Ch. 12 49 CFR Subtitle A, Chs. I–VI, and Chs. X–XII [OST Docket 99–5129] Department Regulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary Office of the Secretary, DOT. Semiannual regulatory agenda. AGENCY: ACTION: The Regulatory Agenda is a semiannual summary of all current and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the Department. The intent of the Agenda is to provide the public with information about the Department of Transportation’s regulatory activity planned for the next 12 months. It is expected that this information will enable the public to be more aware of and allow it to more effectively participate in the Department’s regulatory activity. The public is also invited to submit comments on any aspect of this Agenda. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUMMARY: General You should direct all comments and inquiries on the Agenda in general to Brett Jortland, Acting Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; 202 366–4723. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Specific You should direct all comments and inquiries on particular items in the Agenda to the individual listed for the regulation or the general rulemaking contact person for the operating administration in appendix B. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call 202 755–7687. Table of Contents Supplementary Information Background Significant/Priority Rulemakings Explanation of Information on the Agenda Request for Comments VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Improvement of our regulations is a prime goal of the Department of Transportation (Department or DOT). Our regulations should be clear, simple, timely, fair, reasonable, and necessary. They should not be issued without appropriate involvement of the public; once issued, they should be periodically reviewed and revised, as needed, to assure that they continue to meet the needs for which they originally were designed. To view additional information about the Department of Transportation’s regulatory activities online, go to https://www.dot.gov/ regulations. Among other things, this Web site provides a report, updated monthly, on the status of the DOT significant rulemakings listed in the semiannual regulatory agenda. To help the Department achieve these goals and in accordance with Executive Order (EO) 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ (58 FR 51735; Oct. 4, 1993) and the Department’s Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979), the Department prepares a semiannual regulatory agenda. It summarizes all current and projected rulemaking, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of the Department. These are matters on which action has begun or is projected during the succeeding 12 months or such longer period as may be anticipated or for which action has been completed since the last Agenda. The Agendas are based on reports submitted by the offices initiating the rulemaking and are reviewed by the Department Regulations Council. The Internet is the basic means for disseminating the Unified Agenda. The complete Unified Agenda is available online at www.reginfo.gov, in a format that offers users a greatly enhanced ability to obtain information from the Agenda database. Because publication in the Federal Register is mandated for the regulatory flexibility agendas required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602), DOT’s printed Agenda entries include only: 1. The agency’s Agenda preamble; 2. Rules that are in the agency’s regulatory flexibility agenda, in accordance with the Regulatory PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Flexibility Act, because they are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities; and 3. Any rules that the agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Printing of these entries is limited to fields that contain information required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act’s Agenda requirements. These elements are: Sequence Number; Title; Section 610 Review, if applicable; Legal Authority; Abstract; Timetable; Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required; Agency Contact; and Regulation Identifier Number (RIN). Additional information (for detailed list see section heading ‘‘Explanation of Information on the Agenda’’) on these entries is available in the Unified Agenda published on the Internet. Significant/Priority Rulemakings The Agenda covers all rules and regulations of the Department. We have classified rules as a DOT agency priority in the Agenda if they are, essentially, very costly, beneficial, controversial, or of substantial public interest under our Regulatory Policies and Procedures. All DOT agency priority rulemaking documents are subject to review by the Secretary of Transportation. If the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) decides a rule is subject to its review under Executive Order 12866, we have classified it as significant in the Agenda. Explanation of Information on the Agenda An Office of Management and Budget memorandum, dated March 28, 2013, requires the format for this Agenda. First, the Agenda is divided by initiating offices. Then, the Agenda is divided into five categories: (1) Prerule stage, (2) proposed rule stage, (3) final rule stage, (4) long-term actions, and (5) completed actions. For each entry, the Agenda provides the following information: (1) its ‘‘significance’’; (2) a short, descriptive title; (3) its legal basis; (4) the related regulatory citation in the Code of Federal Regulations; (5) any legal deadline and, if so, for what action (e.g., NPRM, final rule); (6) an abstract; (7) a timetable, including the earliest expected date for a decision on whether to take the action; (8) whether the rulemaking will affect small entities and/or levels of government and, if so, which categories; (9) whether a Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis is required (for rules that would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities); (10) a listing of any analyses an office E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda will prepare or has prepared for the action (with minor exceptions, DOT requires an economic analysis for all its rulemakings); (11) an agency contact office or official who can provide further information; (12) a Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) assigned to identify an individual rulemaking in the Agenda and facilitate tracing further action on the issue; (13) whether the action is subject to the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; (14) whether the action is subject to the Energy Act; and (15) whether the action is major under the congressional review provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. If there is information that does not fit in the other categories, it will be included under a separate heading entitled ‘‘Additional Information.’’ One such example of this is the letters ‘‘SB,’’ ‘‘IC,’’ ‘‘SLT.’’ These refer to information used as part of our required reports on Retrospective Review of DOT rulemakings. A ‘‘Y’’ or an ‘‘N,’’ for yes and no, respectively, follow the letters to indicate whether or not a particular rulemaking would have effects on: small businesses (SB); information collections (IC); or State, local, or tribal (SLT) governments. For nonsignificant regulations issued routinely and frequently as a part of an established body of technical requirements (such as the Federal Aviation Administration’s Airspace Rules), to keep those requirements operationally current, we only include the general category of the regulations, the identity of a contact office or official, and an indication of the expected number of regulations; we do not list individual regulations. In the ‘‘Timetable’’ column, we use abbreviations to indicate the particular documents being considered. ANPRM stands for Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, SNPRM for Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, and NPRM for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Listing a future date in this column does not mean we have made a decision to issue a document; it is the earliest date on which we expect to make a decision on whether to issue it. In addition, these dates are based on current schedules. Information received subsequent to the issuance of this Agenda could result in a decision not to take regulatory action or in changes to proposed publication dates. For example, the need for further evaluation could result in a later publication date; evidence of a greater need for the regulation could result in an earlier publication date. Finally, a dot (•) preceding an entry indicates that the entry appears in the Agenda for the first time. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Request for Comments General Our agenda is intended primarily for the use of the public. Since its inception, we have made modifications and refinements that we believe provide the public with more helpful information, as well as make the Agenda easier to use. We would like you, the public, to make suggestions or comments on how the Agenda could be further improved. Reviews We also seek your suggestions on which of our existing regulations you believe need to be reviewed to determine whether they should be revised or revoked. We particularly draw your attention to the Department’s review plan in appendix D. In response to Executive Order 13563 ‘‘Retrospective Review and Analysis of Existing Rules,’’ we have prepared a retrospective review plan providing more detail on the process we use to conduct reviews of existing rules, including changes in response to Executive Order 13563. We provided the public opportunities to comment at www.regulations.gov and IdeaScale on both our process and any existing DOT rules the public thought needed review. The plan and the results of our review can be found at https://www.dot.gov/ regulations. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Department is especially interested in obtaining information on requirements that have a ‘‘significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities’’ and, therefore, must be reviewed under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. If you have any suggested regulations, please submit them to us, along with your explanation of why they should be reviewed. In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, comments are specifically invited on regulations that we have targeted for review under section 610 of the Act. The phrase (sec. 610 Review) appears at the end of the title for these reviews. Please see appendix D for the Department’s section 610 review plans. Consultation With State, Local, and Tribal Governments Executive Orders 13132 and 13175 require us to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input’’ by State, local, and tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism or tribal implications. These policies are defined in the Executive orders to PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 44289 include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects’’ on States or Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and them, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and various levels of government or Indian tribes. Therefore, we encourage State and local governments or Indian tribes to provide us with information about how the Department’s rulemakings impact them. Purpose The Department is publishing this regulatory Agenda in the Federal Register to share with interested members of the public the Department’s preliminary expectations regarding its future regulatory actions. This should enable the public to be more aware of the Department’s regulatory activity and should result in more effective public participation. This publication in the Federal Register does not impose any binding obligation on the Department or any of the offices within the Department with regard to any specific item on the Agenda. Regulatory action, in addition to the items listed, is not precluded. Dated: April 29, 2013. Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation. Appendix A—Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents To obtain a copy of a specific regulatory document in the Agenda, you should communicate directly with the contact person listed with the regulation at the address below. We note that most, if not all, such documents, including the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, are available through the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov. See appendix C for more information. (Name of contact person), (Name of the DOT agency), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. (For the Federal Aviation Administration, substitute the following address: Office of Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591). Appendix B—General Rulemaking Contact Persons The following is a list of persons who can be contacted within the Department for general information concerning the rulemaking process within the various operating administrations. FAA—Mark Bury, Acting Chief Counsel, International Law, Legislation and Regulations Division, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44290 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda 915A, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–3110. FHWA—Jennifer Outhouse, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–0761. FMCSA—Steven J. LaFreniere, Regulatory Ombudsman, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–0596. NHTSA—Steve Wood, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–2992. FRA—Kathryn Shelton, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W31–214, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 493–6063. FTA—Richard Wong, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room E56–308, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–0675. SLSDC—Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel, 180 Andrews Street, Massena, NY 13662; telephone (315) 764–3200. PHMSA—Patricia Burke, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–4400. MARAD—Christine Gurland, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–5157. RITA—Robert Monniere, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–5498. OST—Brett Jortland, Office of Regulation and Enforcement, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366–4723. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Appendix C—Public Rulemaking Dockets All comments via the Internet are submitted through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at the following address: https:// www.regulations.gov. The FDMS allows the public to search, view, download, and comment on all Federal agency rulemaking documents in one central online system. The above referenced Internet address also allows the public to sign up to receive notification when certain documents are placed in the dockets. The public also may review regulatory dockets at, or deliver comments on proposed rulemakings to, the Dockets Office at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590, 1–800–647–5527. Working Hours: 9–5. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Appendix D—Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements Part I—The Plan General The Department of Transportation has long recognized the importance of regularly reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether they need to be revised or revoked. Our 1979 Regulatory Policies and Procedures require such reviews. We also have responsibilities under Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ and section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to conduct such reviews. This includes the use of plain language techniques in new rules and considering its use in existing rules when we have the opportunity and resources to permit its use. We are committed to continuing our reviews of existing rules and, if needed, will initiate rulemaking actions based on these reviews. In accordance with Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ issued by the President on January 18, 2011, the Department has added other elements to its review plan. The Department has decided to improve its plan by adding special oversight processes within the Department; encouraging effective and timely reviews, including providing additional guidance on particular problems that warrant review; and expanding opportunities for public participation. These new actions are in addition to the other steps described in this appendix. Section 610 Review Plan Section 610 requires that we conduct reviews of rules that: (1) Have been published within the last 10 years, and (2) have a ‘‘significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities’’ (SEIOSNOSE). It also requires that we publish in the Federal Register each year a list of any such rules that we will review during the next year. The Office of the Secretary and each of the Department’s Operating Administrations have a 10-year review plan. These reviews comply with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Changes to the Review Plan Some reviews may be conducted earlier than scheduled. For example, to the extent resources permit, the plain language reviews will be conducted more quickly. Other events, such as accidents, may result in the need to conduct earlier reviews of some rules. Other factors may also result in the need to make changes; for example, we may PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 make changes in response to public comment on this plan or in response to a presidentially-mandated review. If there is any change to the review plan, we will note the change in the following Agenda. For any section 610 review, we will provide the required notice prior to the review. Part II—The Review Process The Analysis Generally, the agencies have divided their rules into 10 different groups and plan to analyze one group each year. For purposes of these reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall schedule for publication of the Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (2008) begins in the fall of 2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 (2009) begins in the fall of 2009 and ends in the fall of 2010, and so on. We request public comment on the timing of the reviews. For example, is there a reason for scheduling an analysis and review for a particular rule earlier than we have? Any comments concerning the plan or particular analyses should be submitted to the regulatory contacts listed in Appendix B, General Rulemaking Contact Persons. Section 610 Review The agency will analyze each of the rules in a given year’s group to determine whether any rule has a SEIOSNOSE and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The level of analysis will, of course, depend on the nature of the rule and its applicability. Publication of agencies’ section 610 analyses listed each fall in this Agenda provides the public with notice and an opportunity to comment consistent with the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We request that public comments be submitted to us early in the analysis year concerning the small entity impact of the rules to help us in making our determinations. In each fall Agenda, the agency will publish the results of the analyses it has completed during the previous year. For rules that had a negative finding on SEIOSNOSE, we will give a short explanation (e.g., ‘‘these rules only establish petition processes that have no cost impact’’ or ‘‘these rules do not apply to any small entities’’). For parts, subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a SEIOSNOSE, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal section 610 review during the following 12 months. At this stage, we will add an entry to the Agenda in the prerulemaking section describing the review in more detail. We also will seek public comment on how E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda best to lessen the impact of these rules and provide a name or docket to which public comments can be submitted. In some cases, the section 610 review may be part of another unrelated review of the rule. In such a case, we plan to clearly indicate which parts of the review are being conducted under section 610. Other Reviews The agency will also examine the specified rules to determine whether any other reasons exist for revising or revoking the rule or for rewriting the rule in plain language. In each fall Agenda, the agency will also publish information on the results of the examinations completed during the previous year. Part III—List of Pending Section 610 Reviews The Agenda identifies the pending DOT section 610 Reviews by inserting ‘‘(Section 610 Review),’’ after the title 44291 for the specific entry. For further information on the pending reviews, see the Agenda entries at www.reginfo.gov. For example, to obtain a list of all entries that is section 610 Reviews under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a user would select the desired responses on the search screen (by selecting ‘‘advanced search’’) and, in effect, generate the desired ‘‘index’’ of reviews. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 49 48 14 14 14 14 14 14 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR parts 91 through 99 and 14 CFR parts 200 through 212 .................................. parts 1201 through 1253 and new parts and subparts ...................................... parts 213 through 232 ........................................................................................ parts 234 through 254 ........................................................................................ parts 255 through 298 and 49 CFR part 40 ....................................................... parts 300 through 373 ........................................................................................ parts 374 through 398 ........................................................................................ part 399 and 49 CFR parts 1 through 11 ........................................................... parts 17 through 28 ............................................................................................ parts 29 through 39 and parts 41 through 89 .................................................... Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules analyzed and summary of results 49 CFR part 95—Advisory Committees • Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. • General: The agency plans to remove part 95 because it has been made obsolete by other laws, regulations, and agency procedures. Removal of these regulations would be cost effective and impose no burdens. Since the regulations will be removed, a review for plain language is not necessary. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis 49 CFR part 91—International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices 49 CFR part 92—Recovering Debts to the United States by Salary Offset 49 CFR part 98—Enforcement of Restrictions on Post-Employment Activities 49 CFR part 99—Employee Responsibilities and Conduct 14 CFR part 200—Definitions and Instructions 14 CFR part 201—Air Carrier Authority Under Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code [Amended] 14 CFR part 203—Waiver of Warsaw Convention Liability Limits and Defenses VerDate Mar<15>2010 Analysis year 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 14 CFR part 204—Data To Support Fitness Determinations 14 CFR part 205—Aircraft Accident Liability Insurance 14 CFR part 206—Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity: Special Authorizations and Exemptions 14 CFR part 207—Charter Trips by U.S. Scheduled Air Carriers 14 CFR part 208—Charter Trips by U.S. Charter Air Carriers 14 CFR part 211—Applications for Permits to Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 212—Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis 14 CFR part 213—Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air Carrier Permits 14 CFR part 214—Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air Carrier Permits Authorizing Charter Transportation Only 14 CFR part 215—Use and Change of Names of Air Carriers, Foreign Air Carriers, and Commuter Air Carriers 14 CFR part 216—Comingling of Blind Sector Traffic by Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 217—Reporting Traffic Statistics by Foreign Air Carriers in Civilian Scheduled, Charter, and Nonscheduled Services 14 CFR part 218—Lease by Foreign Air Carrier or Other Foreign Person of Aircraft With Crew 14 CFR part 221—Tariffs PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 14 CFR part 222—Intermodal Cargo Services by Foreign Air Carriers 14 CFR part 223—Free and ReducedRate Transportation 14 CFR part 232—Transportation of Mail, Review of Orders of Postmaster General Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and summary of results 14 CFR part 234—Airline Service Quality Performance Reports • Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. • General: The Department is anticipating proposing changes to the existing rule to expand the ontime performance ‘‘reporting carrier’’ pool to include smaller carriers to enable the Department to obtain and provide to the flying public a more complete picture of the performance of scheduled passenger service in general. Also, in July 2011, the Department proposed to change the way the Department computes mishandled baggage rates from mishandled baggage reports per domestic enplanement to mishandled bags per checked bags as the Department believes that the current matrix for comparing airline mishandled baggage information is outdated. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 44292 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda revision. 14 CFR part 250—Oversales • Section 610: Certain elements of this existing rule impose requirements on certain small air carriers but the Department has determined that the economic impact is not significant. • General: The Department made some changes to this part in April 2008 and April 2011. No additional changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden as all air carriers have control over the extent to which the rule impacts them because they control their own overbooking rates. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 252—Smoking Aboard Aircraft • Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. • General: In September 2011, the Department proposed to change the existing rule to explicitly ban the smoking of electronic cigarettes on air carriers and foreign air carrier flights in scheduled intrastate, interstate, and foreign air transportation. The Department is also considering banning smoking on charter flights with 19 or more passenger seats in part out of concern about the health effects of secondhand smoke on flight attendants aboard such flights. Carriers that provide air transportation exclusively with aircraft that seat no more than 60 passenger seats are considered to be small entities. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 253—Notice of Terms of Contract of Carriage • Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. • General: A minor change to a provision in this part regarding retroactive changes to contracts of carriage was finalized in 2009. No additional changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 254—Domestic Baggage Liability • Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing rule does not have a significant effect on VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 a substantial number of small entities. • General: The Department periodically raises the minimum limit on domestic baggage liability applicable to air carriers to reflect inflation. The Department anticipates adjusting the minimum limit of liability from the current amount of $3,300 announced by the Department in November 2008 to $3,400, to take into account the changes in consumer prices since the prior revision. This revision would affect only flight segments operated with large aircraft and other flight segments appearing on the same ticket as a large-aircraft segment. As a result, many operations of small entities, such as air taxis and many commuter air carriers, would not be covered by the rule. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis 14 CFR part 240—Inspection of Accounts and Property 14 CFR part 241—Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large Certificated Air Carriers 14 CFR part 243—Passenger Manifest Information 14 CFR part 247—Direct Airport-toAirport Mileage Records 14 CFR part 248—Submission of Audit Reports 14 CFR part 249—Preservation of Air Carrier Records Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules to be analyzed during the next year 14 CFR part 255—Airline Computer Reservations Systems 14 CFR part 256—[Reserved] 14 CFR part 271—Guidelines for Subsidizing Air Carriers Providing Essential Air Transportation 14 CFR part 272—Essential Air Service to the Freely Associated States 14 CFR part 291—Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation 14 CFR part 292—International Cargo Transportation 14 CFR part 293—International Passenger Transportation 14 CFR part 294—Canadian Charter Air Taxi Operators 14 CFR part 296—Indirect Air Transportation of Property 14 CFR part 297—Foreign Air Freight Forwarders and Foreign Cooperative Shippers Associations 14 CFR part 298—Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results 14 CFR part 257—Disclosure of CodeSharing Arrangements and LongTerm Wet Leases • Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. • General: The Department is anticipating proposing changes to the existing rule to codify the requirements in a statute (49 U.S.C. 41712(c)) and the Department’s enforcement policy with respect to Web site disclosure of code-share and long-term wet lease arrangements. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 258—Disclosure of Changeof-Gauge Services • Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 259—Enhanced Protections for Airline Passengers • Section 610: This rule imposes requirements on small air carriers but the Department believes that the economic impact will not be significant. • General: The Department is anticipating proposing changes to the existing rule to require comfortable cabin temperatures when there is a lengthy tarmac delay and to require a marketing carrier provide assistance to its code-share partner when a flight operated by the code-share partner experiences a lengthy tarmac delay. OST’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. Federal Aviation Administration Section 610 Review Plan The FAA has elected to use the twostep, 2-year process used by most DOT modes in past plans. As such, the FAA has divided its rules into 10 groups as displayed in the table below. During the first year (the ‘‘analysis year’’), all rules published during the previous 10 years within a 10 percent block of the regulations will be analyzed to identify those with a SEIOSNOSE. During the second year (the ‘‘review year’’), each rule identified in the analysis year as E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44293 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda having a SEIONOSE will be reviewed in accordance with section 610(b) to determine if it should be continued Year those reviews will be published in the DOT Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR parts parts parts parts parts parts parts parts parts parts Analysis year 119 through 129 and parts 150 through 156 ............................................ 133 through 139 and parts 157 through 169 ............................................ 141 through 147 and parts 170 through 187 ............................................ 189 through 198 and parts 1 through 16 .................................................. 17 through 33 ............................................................................................ 34 through 39 and parts 400 through 405 ................................................ 43 through 49 and parts 406 through 415 ................................................ 60 through 77 ............................................................................................ 91 through 105 .......................................................................................... 417 through 460 ........................................................................................ Year 5 (2012) List of rules analyzed and summary of results sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS without change or changed to minimize impact on small entities. Results of 14 CFR part 17—Procedures for Protests and Contract Disputes • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 21—Certification Procedures for Products and Parts • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 23—Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 25—Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found that the SEIOSNOSE no longer exists. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 26—Continued Airworthiness and Safety Improvements for Transport Category Airplanes • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 27—Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 29—Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Rotorcraft • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Review year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 14 CFR part 31—Airworthiness Standards: Manned Free Balloons • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 14 CFR part 33—Airworthiness Standards: Aircraft Engines • Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of this part and found no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FAA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 6 (2013) List of rules to be analyzed during the next year 14 CFR part 34—Fuel Venting and Exhaust Emission Requirements for Turbine Engine Powered Airplanes 14 CFR part 35—Airworthiness Standards: Propellers 14 CFR part 36—Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness Certification 14 CFR part 39—Airworthiness Directives 14 CFR part 400—Basis and Scope 14 CFR part 401—Organization and Definitions 14 CFR part 404—Regulations and Licensing Requirements 14 CFR part 405—Investigations and Enforcement FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ None ................................................................................................................................. 23 CFR parts 1 to 260 ...................................................................................................... VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Analysis year E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 2008 2009 Review year 2009 2010 44294 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION—Continued SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 23 CFR parts 420 to 470 .................................................................................................. 23 CFR part 500 ............................................................................................................... 23 CFR parts 620 to 637 .................................................................................................. 23 CFR parts 645 to 669 .................................................................................................. 23 CFR parts 710 to 924 .................................................................................................. 23 CFR parts 940 to 973 .................................................................................................. 23 CFR parts 1200 to 1252 .............................................................................................. New parts and subparts ................................................................................................... Federal-Aid Highway Program The FHWA has adopted regulations in title 23 of the CFR, chapter I, related to the Federal-Aid Highway Program. These regulations implement and carry out the provisions of Federal law relating to the administration of Federal aid for highways. The primary law authorizing Federal aid for highways is chapter I of title 23 of the U.S.C. section 145 of title 23 expressly provides for a federally assisted State program. For this reason, the regulations adopted by the FHWA in title 23 of the CFR primarily relate to the requirements that States must meet to receive Federal funds for the construction and other work related to highways. Because the regulations in title 23 primarily relate to Analysis year States, which are not defined as small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the FHWA believes that its regulations in title 23 do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The FHWA solicits public comment on this preliminary conclusion. Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results 23 CFR part 500—Management and Monitoring Systems • Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FHWA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 substantial revision. Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year 23 CFR part 620—Engineering 23 CFR part 625—Design Standards for Highways 23 CFR part 626—Pavement Policy 23 CFR part 627—Value Engineering 23 CFR part 630—Preconstruction Procedures 23 CFR part 633—Required Contract Provisions 23 CFR part 635—Construction and Maintenance 23 CFR part 636—Design-build Contracting 23 CFR part 637—Construction Inspection and Approval FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR part 372, subpart A ............................................................................................. part 386 ............................................................................................................... parts 325 and 390 (General) .............................................................................. parts 390 (Small Passenger-Carrying Vehicles), 391 to 393 and 396 to 399 ... part 387 ............................................................................................................... parts 356, 367, 369 to 371, 372 (subparts B and C) ......................................... parts 373, 374, 376, and 379 ............................................................................. parts 360, 365, 366, and 368 ............................................................................. parts 377, 378 ..................................................................................................... part 395 ............................................................................................................... Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results 49 CFR Part 372—Exemptions From the Operating Authority Regulations Applicable to For-Hire Motor Carriers • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations provide exemptions from the requirements for certain for-hire motor carriers to apply for operating authority from FMCSA. The regulations reduce the regulatory burden on small businesses by enabling certain for- VerDate Mar<15>2010 Analysis year 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 hire carriers to conduct business without being required to apply for operating authority. The regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FMCSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantive revision. Year 2 (fall 2009) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results 49 CFR part 386—Rules of Practice for Motor Carrier, Broker, Freight Forwarder, and Hazardous Materials Proceedings • Section 610: There is a SEIOSNOSE, as a significant PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 number of small entities may be affected by legal fees and safety consultants’ fees associated with preparing an adequate response to FMCSA notices of claims and notices of violations and the submission of corrective action plans following an unsuccessful new entrant audit or compliance review. It was found that the cost for legal representation and other costs for a formal hearing to appeal a decision may have a significant impact on small firms. However, these proceedings would only come about if the regulated entity failed to comply with applicable Federal E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda regulations and FMCSA initiated enforcement action as a result of non-compliance. Subpart D, ‘‘General Rules and Hearings,’’ addresses rules and procedures for the conduct of formal hearings. The principal economic impact of part 386 is the cost to a small firm of defending itself under these procedures. However, as noted above, carriers that achieve compliance with FMCSA’s commercial and safety regulations would not be subject to enforcement actions and therefore would not undergo such procedures. • General: The Agency considered whether the rules of practice impose unnecessary burdens on small businesses that undergo enforcement actions as a result of non-compliance with the Agency’s commercial and safety regulations. The Agency concluded that the rules of practice do not impose unnecessary burdens on such businesses when they achieve compliance with the applicable safety and hazardous materials regulations. Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis 49 CFR part 325—Compliance with Interstate Motor Carrier Noise Emission 49 CFR part 390 — Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, General • This rule was moved up from Year 4 as a result of the Department’s Retrospective Regulatory Review. 44295 Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis 49 CFR part 391—Driver Qualifications 49 CFR part 392—Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles 49 CFR part 393—Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation 49 CFR part 396—Inspection, Repair and Maintenance of Commercial Motor Vehicles 49 CFR part 397—Transportation of Hazardous Materials; Driving and Parking Rules 49 CFR part 398—Transportation of Migrant Workers 49 CFR part 399—Employee Safety and Health Standards Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed this year 49 CFR Part 387—Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility for Motor Carriers NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 49 23 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR parts parts parts parts parts parts parts parts parts parts 571.223 through 571.500, and parts 575 and 579 ................................... 1200 through 1300 .................................................................................... 501 through 526 and 571.213 ................................................................... 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 .................................. 571.101 through 571.110, and 571.135, 571.138, and 571.139 .............. 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 ............................................. 571.111 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 588 .............................. 571.201 through 571.212 .......................................................................... 571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 ............................................... 591 through 595 and new parts and subparts .......................................... Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of the results 49 CFR Part 571.131—School Bus Pedestrian Safety Devices • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 571.217—Bus Emergency Exits and Window Retention and Release • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 571.220—School Bus Rollover Protection • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:09 Jul 22, 2013 Analysis year Jkt 229001 NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 571.221—School Bus Body Joint Strength • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR part 571.222—School Bus Passenger Seating and Crash Protection • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA’s plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year 49 CFR part 571.101—Controls and Displays PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 49 CFR part 571.102—Transmission Shift Position Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect 49 CFR part 571.103—Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems 49 CFR part 571.104—Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems 49 CFR part 571.105—Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems 49 CFR part 571.106—Brake Hoses 49 CFR part 571.107—[Reserved] 49 CFR part 571.108—Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment 49 CFR part 571.109—New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires 49 CFR part 571.110—Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/ Recreation Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) or Less 49 CFR part 571.135—Light Vehicle Brake Systems E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44296 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda 49 CFR part 571.138—Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems 49 CFR part 571.139—New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR Analysis year parts 200 and 201 ............................................................................................... parts 207, 209, 211, 215, 238, and 256 ............................................................. parts 210, 212, 214, 217, and 268 ..................................................................... part 219 ............................................................................................................... parts 218, 221, 241, and 244 ............................................................................. parts 216, 228, and 229 ..................................................................................... parts 223 and 233 ............................................................................................... parts 224, 225, 231, and 234 ............................................................................. parts 222, 227, 235, 236, 250, 260, and 266 ..................................................... parts 213, 220, 230, 232, 239, 240, and 265 ..................................................... Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results 49 CFR part 219—Control of Alcohol and Drug Use • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. • General: No changes are needed. This rule is cost effective and imposes the least burden. FRA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed during next year 49 CFR part 218—Control of Alcohol and Drug Use 49 CFR part 221—Rear End Marking Device Passenger, Commuter, and Freight Trains Review year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 49 CFR part 241—United States Locational Requirement for Dispatching of United States Rail Operations 49 CFR part 244—Regulations on Safety Integration Plans Governing Railroad Consolidations, Mergers, and Acquisitions of Control FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Analysis year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR parts 604, 605, and 633 ..................................................................................... parts 661 and 665 ............................................................................................... part 633 ............................................................................................................... parts 609 and 611 ............................................................................................... parts 613 and 614 ............................................................................................... part 622 ............................................................................................................... part 630 ............................................................................................................... part 639 ............................................................................................................... parts 659 and 663 ............................................................................................... part 665 ............................................................................................................... • General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. FTA’s plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules analyzed and summary of results 49 CFR part 605—School Bus Operations • Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis 49 CFR part 609—Transportation for Elderly and Handicapped Persons 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed during the next year 49 CFR part 613—Planning Assistance and Standards 49 CFR part 614—Transportation Infrastructure Management sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS MARITIME ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 Regulations to be reviewed ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 46 46 46 46 46 46 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR Analysis year parts 201 through 205 ........................................................................................ parts 221 through 232 ........................................................................................ parts 249 through 296 ........................................................................................ parts 221, 298, 308, and 309 ............................................................................. parts 307 through 309 ........................................................................................ part 310 ............................................................................................................... 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda 44297 MARITIME ADMINISTRATION—Continued SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 46 46 46 46 CFR CFR CFR CFR parts parts parts parts 315 345 382 390 through through through through Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis 46 CFR part 381—Cargo Preference— U.S.-Flag Vessels 46 CFR part 383—Cargo Preference— Compromise, Assessment, Mitigation, Settlement & Collection of Civil Penalties 46 CFR part 221—Foreign Transfer Regulations 340 381 389 393 Analysis year ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................ ........................................................................................ 46 CFR part 249—Approval of Underwriters for Marine Hull Insurance 46 CFR part 272—Requirements and Procedures for Conducting Condition Surveys and Administering Maintenance and Repair Subsidy 46 CFR part 287—Establishment of Construction Reserve Funds 46 CFR part 295—Maritime Security Program (MSP) 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2015 2016 2017 2018 46 CFR part 296—Maritime Security Program (MSP) Year 5 (2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year 46 CFR part 307—Mandatory Position Report System for Vessels 46 CFR part 308—War Risk Insurance 46 CFR part 309—War Risk Ship Valuation PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (PHMSA) SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR part 178 ............................................................................................................... parts 178 through 180 ........................................................................................ parts 172 and 175 ............................................................................................... part 171, sections 171.15 and 171.16 ................................................................ parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and 195 ..................................................................... parts 174, 177, 191, and 192 ............................................................................. parts 176 and 199 ............................................................................................... parts 172 through 178 ........................................................................................ parts 172, 173, 174, 176, 177, and 193 ............................................................. parts 173 and 194 ............................................................................................... sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results 49 CFR section 171.15—Immediate Notice of Certain Hazardous Materials Incidents • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Annually fewer than 100 small entities are required to file a report telephonic report. Therefore, though some small entities may be affected the economic impact on small entities will not be significant. • General: This rule prescribes requirements for the immediate notice of certain hazardous materials incidents by telephone to the National Response Center (NRC). The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. In addition to gathering and distributing spill data for Federal VerDate Mar<15>2010 Analysis year 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 On-Scene Coordinators and serving as the communications and operations center for the National Response Team, the NRC maintains agreements with a variety of Federal entities to make additional notifications regarding incidents meeting established trigger criteria. Section 171.15(b) establishes the trigger criteria for a reportable hazardous materials incident. PHMSA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision. 49 CFR section 171.16—Detailed Hazardous Materials Incident Reports • Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Based on a review of detailed incident reports PHMSA found that only 3 percent of the nearly 15,000 incidents reports submitted in FY2011 were filed by small entities. Therefore, though some small entities may be affected the economic impact on small entities will not be significant. • General: This rule prescribes requirements for detailed hazardous PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 materials incident reports. PHMSA relies on this data and information to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing regulations; determine the need for regulatory changes to cover changing transportation safety problems; and identify major problem areas that should receive priority attention. In addition, both government and industry use this information to chart trends, identify problems and training inadequacies, evaluate packaging, and assess ways to reduce hazardous materials releases. In FY2011 PHMSA accepted two petitions for rulemaking (P–1562; PHMSA–2010–0207 and P–1566; PHMSA–2010–0225) that request revisions to the incident reporting requirements. As a result of these petitions, PHMSA is currently conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of the requirements for detailed hazardous materials incident reporting in section 171.16. PHMSA concluded this study in FY2012. Based on the E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44298 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda results of the study PHMSA is considering regulatory action to address its findings, the petitions, and simplify the incident reporting process. PHMSA’s plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision. Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year 49 CFR part 106—Rulemaking Procedures 49 CFR part 107—Hazardous Materials Program Procedures 49 CFR part 171—General Information, Regulations, and Definitions 49 CFR part 190—Pipeline Safety Programs and Rulemaking Procedures 49 CFR part 195—Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION (RITA) SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 2 ........................ 3 ........................ 4 ........................ 5 ........................ 6 ........................ 7 ........................ 8 ........................ 9 ........................ 10 ...................... 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR part part part part part part part part part part Analysis year 241, form 41 ................................................................................................ 241, schedule T–100, and part 217 ............................................................ 298 ............................................................................................................... 241, section 19–7 ........................................................................................ 291 ............................................................................................................... 234 ............................................................................................................... 249 ............................................................................................................... 248 ............................................................................................................... 250 ............................................................................................................... 374a, ICAO .................................................................................................. Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis 14 CFR part 241—Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large Certificated Air Carriers, Form 41 Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis 14 CFR part 298, subpart f—Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier Operations—Reporting Requirements Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis Review year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year 14 CFR part 291—Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation 14 CFR part 241, section 19–7— Passenger Origin-Destination Survey SAINT LAWRENCE SEAWAY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SECTION 610 AND OTHER REVIEWS Analysis year Year Regulations to be reviewed 1 ........................ 33 CFR parts 401 through 403 ........................................................................................ Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis 33 CFR part 401—Seaway Regulations and Rules 2008 Review year 2009 33 CFR part 402—Tariff of Tolls 33 CFR part 403—Rules of Procedure of the Joint Tolls Review Board OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY—PROPOSED RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 45 ...................... +Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections III ................................................................................................. 2105–AE11 + DOT-designated significant regulation. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY—FINAL RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 46 ...................... +Use of the Seat-Strapping Method for Carrying a Wheelchair on an Aircraft ............................................... + DOT-designated significant regulation. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 2105–AD87 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda 44299 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 47 ...................... 48 ...................... +Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) ................................................... +Flight Crewmember Mentoring, Leadership and Professional Development (HR 5900) .............................. 2120–AJ60 2120–AJ87 + DOT-designated significant regulation. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 49 ...................... +Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements (Formerly First Officer Qualification Requirements) (HR 5900). +Safety Management Systems for Certificate Holders (Section 610 Review) .............................................. 50 ...................... 2120–AJ67 2120–AJ86 + DOT-designated significant regulation. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION—LONG-TERM ACTIONS Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 51 ...................... +Air Carrier Maintenance Training Program (Section 610 Review) .............................................................. 2120–AJ79 + DOT-designated significant regulation. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 52 ...................... 53 ...................... 54 ...................... +Commercial Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP–21) .................................................. +Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents (MAP–21) ................................. +Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR) .......................................... 2126–AB18 2126–AB20 2126–AB46 + DOT-designated significant regulation. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 55 ...................... +Unified Registration System .......................................................................................................................... 2126–AA22 + DOT-designated significant regulation. FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—COMPLETED ACTIONS Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 56 ...................... Self Reporting of Out-of-State Convictions (RRR) (Section 610 Review) ..................................................... 2126–AB43 FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 57 ...................... +Risk Reduction Program ................................................................................................................................ 2130–AC11 + DOT-designated significant regulation. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—PROPOSED RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 58 ...................... 59 ...................... 60 ...................... +Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines ................................................................. Pipeline Safety: Issues Related To the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry .................................... Pipeline Safety: Miscellaneous Amendments Related to Reauthorization and Petitions for Rulemaking (RRR). + DOT-designated significant regulation. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 2137–AE66 2137–AE93 2137–AE94 44300 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—FINAL RULE STAGE Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 61 ...................... +Hazardous Materials: Revisions to Requirements for the Transportation of Lithium Batteries .................... 2137–AE44 + DOT-designated significant regulation. PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION—COMPLETED ACTIONS Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 62 ...................... Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR) (Completion of a Section 610 Review) ........... 2137–AE78 MARITIME ADMINISTRATION—LONG-TERM ACTIONS Regulation Identifier No. Sequence No. Title 63 ...................... + Regulations To Be Followed by All Departments, Agencies, and Shippers Having Responsibility To Provide a Preference for U.S.-Flag Vessels in the Shipment of Cargoes on Ocean Vessels. 2133–AB74 + DOT-designated significant regulation. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Office of the Secretary (OST) sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Proposed Rule Stage 45. + Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections III Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712; 49 U.S.C. 40101;49 U.S.C. 41702 Abstract: This rulemaking would address the following issues: (1) whether the Department should require a marketing carrier to provide assistance to its code-share partner when a flight operated by the code-share partner experiences a lengthy tarmac delay; (2) whether the Department should enhance disclosure requirements on code-share operations, including requiring on-time performance data, reporting of certain data code-share operations, and codifying the statutory amendment of 49 U.S.C. 41712(c) regarding Web site schedule disclosure of code-share operations; (3) whether the Department should expand the ontime performance ‘‘reporting carrier’’ pool to include smaller carriers; (4) whether the Department should require travel agents to adopt minimum customer service standards in relation to the sale of air transportation; (5) whether the Department should require ticket agents to disclose the carriers whose tickets they sell or do not sell and information regarding any incentive payments they receive in connection with the sale of air transportation; (6) whether the Department should require ticket agents to disclose any preferential display of individual fares or carriers in the ticket agent´s Internet displays; (7) whether the Department should require VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 additional or special disclosures regarding certain substantial fees, e.g., oversize or overweight baggage fees; (8) whether the Department should prohibit post-purchase price increase for all services and products not purchased with the ticket or whether it is sufficient to prohibit post-purchase price increases for baggage charges that traditionally have been included in the ticket price; and (9) whether the Department should require that ancillary fees be displayed through all sale channels. Timetable: Action Date NPRM .................. FR Cite 08/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie, Attorney, Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202–366–9342, TDD Phone: 202–755–7687, Fax: 202 366–7152, Email: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov. RIN: 2105–AE11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Office of the Secretary (OST) Final Rule Stage 46. + Use of the Seat–Strapping Method for Carrying A Wheelchair on an Aircraft Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41705 Abstract: This rulemaking would address whether carriers should be PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 allowed to utilize the seat-strapping method to stow a passenger´s wheelchair in the aircraft cabin. Timetable: Action Date FR Cite NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period End. Final Rule ............ 06/03/11 08/02/11 76 FR 32107 07/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie, Attorney, Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202–366–9342, TDD Phone: 202 755–7687, Fax: 202 366–7152, Email: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov. RIN: 2105–AD87. BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Proposed Rule Stage 47. +Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701; P.L. 112–95 Abstract: This rulemaking would adopt specific rules for the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems in the National Airspace System (NAS). These changes would address the classification of small unmanned aircraft, certification of their pilots and visual observers, registration, approval E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda of operations, and operational limits in order to maintain the safety and efficiency of the NAS. This proposal addresses model aircraft operations as well. This rulemaking would require regular collection of safety data from the user community to enable the FAA to assess the effectiveness of these regulations and to integrate unmanned aircraft systems into the NAS in the future. Timetable: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Final Rule Stage 49. +Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements (Formerly First Officer Qualification Requirements) (HR 5900) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 35301 to 45302; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); 49 Action Date FR Cite U.S.C. 44701 to 44703; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44707; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to NPRM .................. 10/00/13 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 45102 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis to 45103; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 U.S.C. Required: Yes. 44717; Pub. L. 111–216 Abstract: This rulemaking would Agency Contact: Stephen A Glowacki, amend the eligibility and qualification Department of Transportation, Federal requirements for pilots engaged in part Aviation Administration, 800 121 air carrier operations. Additionally, Independence Avenue SW., it would modify the requirements for an Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 385– airline transport pilot certificate. These 4898, Email: actions are necessary because recent stephen.a.glowacki@faa.gov. airline accidents and incidents have RIN: 2120–AJ60 brought considerable attention to the experience level and training of air 48. +Flight Crewmember Mentoring, carrier flight crews. This rulemaking is Leadership and Professional a result of requirements in Public Law Development (HR 5900) 111–216. Timetable: Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); Pub. L. 111–216, sec. 206 Action Date FR Cite Abstract: This rulemaking would ANPRM ............... 02/08/10 75 FR 6164 amend the regulations for air carrier ANPRM Comment 04/09/10 training programs under part 121. The Period End. action is necessary to ensure that air NPRM .................. 02/29/12 77 FR 12374 carriers establish or modify training NPRM Comment 04/30/12 programs that address mentoring, Period End. Final Rule ............ 07/00/13 leadership, and professional development of flight crewmembers in Regulatory Flexibility Analysis part 121 operations. The amendments Required: Yes. are intended to contribute significantly Agency Contact: Barbara Adams, to airline safety by reducing aviation accidents and respond to the mandate in Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Public Law 111–216. Independence Ave. SW., Washington, Timetable: DC 20591, Phone: 202 267–8166, Email: barbara.adams@faa.gov. Action Date FR Cite RIN: 2120–AJ67 sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS NPRM .................. 10/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Deke Abbott, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 267– 8266, Email: deke.abbott@faa.gov. RIN: 2120–AJ87 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 50. +Safety Management Systems for Certificate Holders (Section 610 Review) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C. 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 46105; Pub. L. 111–216, sec. 215 Abstract: This rulemaking would require each certificate holder operating under 14 CFR part 121 to develop and implement a safety management system PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 44301 (SMS) to improve the safety of its aviation related activities. A safety management system is a comprehensive, process-oriented approach to managing safety throughout an organization. An SMS includes an organization-wide safety policy; formal methods for identifying hazards, controlling, and continually assessing risk and safety performance; and promotion of a safety culture. SMS stresses not only compliance with technical standards but increased emphasis on the overall safety performance of the organization. This rulemaking is required under Public Law 111–216, sec. 215. Timetable: Action Date FR Cite NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period Extended. NPRM Comment Period End. Comment Period Extended. Final Rule ............ 11/05/10 01/31/11 75 FR 68224 76 FR 5296 02/03/11 03/07/11 10/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Scott VanBuren, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 494– 8417, Email: scott.vanburen@faa.gov. RIN: 2120–AJ86 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Long-Term Actions 51. +Air Carrier Maintenance Training Program (Section 610 Review) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 47111; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44715; 49 U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C. 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 46105 Abstract: This rulemaking would require FAA approval of maintenance training programs of air carriers that operate aircraft type certificated for a passenger seating configuration of 10 seats or more (excluding any pilot seat). The intent of this rulemaking is to reduce the number of accidents and incidents caused by human error, improper maintenance, inspection, or repair practices. Timetable: Next Action Undetermined. E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44302 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No. Agency Contact: John J Hiles, Flight Standards Service, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 950 L’Enfant Plaza North SW., Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 385–6421, Email: john.j.hiles@faa.gov. RIN: 2120–AJ79 BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Proposed Rule Stage 52. +Commercial Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP–21) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31306 Abstract: This rulemaking would create a central database for verified positive controlled substances and alcohol test results for commercial driver’s license (CDL) holders and refusals by such drivers to submit to testing. This rulemaking would require employers of CDL holders and service agents to report positive test results and refusals to test into the Clearinghouse. Prospective employers, acting on an application for a CDL driver position with the applicant´s written consent to access the Clearinghouse, would query the Clearinghouse to determine if any specific information about the driver applicant is in the Clearinghouse before allowing the applicant to be hired and to drive CMVs. This rulemaking is intended to increase highway safety by ensuring CDL holders, who have tested positive or have refused to submit to testing, have completed the U.S. DOT´s return-to-duty process before driving CMVs in interstate or intrastate commerce. It is also intended to ensure that employers are meeting their drug and alcohol testing responsibilities. Additionally, provisions in this rulemaking would also be responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP–21) Act. MAP–21 requires creation of the Clearinghouse by 10/1/14. Timetable: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Action Date NPRM .................. FR Cite 07/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Deborah Snider, Chief, Commercial Enforcement (MC– ECC), Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–0916, Email: deborah.snider@fmcsa.dot.gov. RIN: 2126–AB18 53. +Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents (MAP–21) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502; 31136(a); Pub. L. 103.311; 49 U.S.C. 31137(a) Abstract: This SNPRM would establish: (1) minimum performance standards for electronic logging devices (ELDs); (2) requirements for the mandatory use of the devices by drivers required to prepare handwritten records of duty status (RODS); (3) requirements concerning HOS supporting documents; and (4) measures to ensure that the mandatory use of ELDs will not result in harassment of drivers by motor carriers and enforcement officials. This rulemaking supplements the Agency’s February 1, 2011, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and addresses issues raised by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Court in its 2011 decision vacating the Agency’s April 5, 2010, final rule concerning ELDs. The requirements for ELDs would improve compliance with the hours-ofservice (HOS) rules and thereby decrease the risk of fatigue-related crashes attributable to non-compliance with the applicable HOS requirements. Timetable: Action Date FR Cite NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period End. Comment Period Extended. Extended Comment Period End. Supplemental NPRM. 02/01/11 02/28/11 76 FR 5537 03/10/11 76 FR 13121 05/23/11 11/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Deborah M Freund, Senior Transportation Specialist, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366– 5370, Email: deborah.freund@dot.gov. RIN: 2126–AB20 54. +Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection Report (RRR) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502(b) Abstract: This rulemaking would rescind the requirement that commercial motor vehicle (CMV) PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 drivers operating in interstate commerce submit, and motor carriers retain, driver-vehicle inspection reports when the driver has neither found nor been made aware of any vehicle defects or deficiencies. Specifically, this rulemaking would remove a significant information collection burden without adversely impacting safety. This rulemaking responds in part to the President´s January 2012 Regulatory Review and Reform initiative. Timetable: Action Date NPRM .................. FR Cite 09/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher, MC– PRR, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–3740, Email: sean.gallagher@dot.gov. RIN: 2126–AB46 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Final Rule Stage 55. +Unified Registration System Legal Authority: Pub. L. 104–88; 109 Stat 803, 888 (1995); 49 U.S.C. 13908; Pub. L. 109–159, sec 4304 Abstract: This rule would establish a new Unified Registration System (URS) to replace four legacy systems in support of FMCSA´s safety and commercial oversight responsibilities. It would require all entities subject to FMCSA jurisdiction to comply with a new URS registration and biennial update requirement and, disclose the cumulative registration information collected by URS. It would and provides a cross-reference to all regulatory requirements necessary to obtain permanent registration. It implements statutory provisions in the ICC Termination Act and SAFTEA–LU. URS would serve as a clearinghouse and depository of information on, and identification of, motor carriers, brokers, freight forwarders, and others required to register with the Department of Transportation. The agency has determined the total net societal benefits of the rule to be $19.5 million and the total societal costs to be $26.5 million. Timetable: E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda Date FR Cite ANPRM ............... ANPRM Comment Period End. NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period End. Supplemental NPRM. SNPRM Comment Period End. Final Rule ............ 08/26/96 10/25/96 61 FR 43816 05/19/05 08/17/05 70 FR 28990 10/26/11 76 FR 66506 12/27/11 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq. Abstract: This rulemaking would address effective procedures that hazardous liquid operators can use to improve the protection of High Consequence Areas (HCA) and other vulnerable areas along their hazardous liquid onshore pipelines. PHMSA is considering whether changes are needed to the regulations covering hazardous liquid onshore pipelines, whether other areas should be included as HCAs for integrity management (IM) protections, what the repair timeframes should be for areas outside the HCAs that are assessed as part of the IM program, whether leak detection standards are necessary, valve spacing requirements are needed on new construction or existing pipelines, and PHMSA should extend regulation to certain pipelines currently exempt from regulation. The agency would also address the public safety and environmental aspects any new requirements, as well as the cost implications and regulatory burden. Timetable: 07/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Genevieve Sapir, Management Analyst, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Policy (MC–CCR), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–7056, Email: genevieve.sapir@dot.gov. RIN: 2126–AA22 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Completed Actions 56. Self Reporting of Out-of-State Convictions (RRR) (Section 610 Review) Legal Authority: Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 Abstract: This rulemaking would clarify the requirement for holders of commercial drivers licenses (CDL) convicted of violating traffic laws in a State other than the State that issued their CDL, to notify the State of issuance about those violations under part 383.31 of FMCSA’s Commercial Drivers License Standards; and clarify the requirement for the licensing agency from the jurisdiction in which the conviction takes place to notify the State licensing Agency that issued the CDL under part 384.209 State Compliance with Commercial Drivers License Program. This rulemaking would also ensure that notifications required in sections 383.31 and 384.209 take place within 30 days of the conviction. Timetable: Action sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Agency Contact: Robert Redmond, Senior Transportation Specialist, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366– 5014, Email: robert.redmond@dot.gov. RIN: 2126–AB43 BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P Action Date FR Cite NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period End. Final Rule ............ Final Rule Effective. 08/02/12 10/01/12 77 FR 46010 04/26/13 05/28/13 78 FR 24684 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Proposed Rule Stage 57. +Risk Reduction Program Legal Authority: Pub. L. no 110–432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 et seq.; Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 103, 49 U.S.C. 20156 ‘‘Railroad Safety Risk Reduction Program’’ Abstract: This rulemaking would consider appropriate contents or require each Class I railroad and each railroad with inadequate safety performance to develop and implement a Risk Reduction Program (RRP) and how they should be implemented and reviewed by FRA. Program (RRP) to improve the safety of their operations. Each RRP would be required to include a risk analysis, a technology implementation plan, and a fatigue management plan. Railroads would be required to conduct annual internal assessments of their RRPs, which could also be externally audited by FRA. Timetable: Action Date FR Cite ANPRM ............... ANPRM Comment Period End. NPRM .................. 12/08/10 02/07/11 75 FR 76345 09/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton, Trial Attorney, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 493–6063, Email: kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov. RIN: 2130–AC11 BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Proposed Rule Stage 58. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines Action Date FR Cite ANPRM ............... ANPRM Comment Period End. ANPRM Comment Period Extended. ANPRM Extended Comment Period End. NPRM .................. 10/18/10 01/18/11 75 FR 63774 01/04/11 76 FR 303 02/18/11 10/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: John A Gale, Transportation Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–0434, Email: john.gale@dot.gov. RIN: 2137–AE66 59. Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq. Abstract: This rulemaking would address a number of issues related to the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No. VerDate Mar<15>2010 44303 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 44304 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda use of plastic pipe in the gas pipeline industry. These issues include composite pipe petitions, plastic issues on gas lines, authorized use of PA12 at higher pressures, 50 year markings, increasing design factor from 0.32 to 0.40 for polyethylene pipe, characterization of ‘‘plastic pipe’’ to ‘‘non-metallic pipe,’’ leak repair revisions, incorporation by reference certain ANSI standards and enhanced tracking and traceability of lines. Timetable: Action Date NPRM .................. FR Cite 04/00/14 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Cameron H Satterthwaite, Transportation Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8553, Email: cameron.satterthwaite@dot.gov. RIN: 2137–AE93 60. Pipeline Safety: Miscellaneous Amendments Related to Reauthorization and Petitions for Rulemaking (RRR) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq. Abstract: This rulemaking will address miscellaneous issues that have been raised because of the reauthorization of the pipeline safety program in 2012 and petitions for rulemaking from many affected stakeholders. Some of the issues that this rulemaking would address include, renewal process for special permits, cost recovery for design reviews and incident reporting. Timetable: Date NPRM .................. sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Action FR Cite 01/00/14 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: John A Gale, Transportation Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–0434, Email: john.gale@dot.gov. RIN: 2137–AE94 VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Final Rule Stage 61. +Hazardous Materials: Revisions to Requirements for the Transportation of Lithium Batteries Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations to comprehensively address the safe transportation of lithium cells and batteries. The intent of the rulemaking is to strengthen the current regulatory framework by imposing more effective safeguards, including design testing to address risks related to internal short circuits, and enhanced packaging, hazard communication, and operational measures for various types and sizes of lithium batteries in specific transportation contexts. The rulemaking would respond to several recommendations issued by the National Transportation Safety Board. Timetable: Action Date FR Cite NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period End. Notice .................. Notice Comment Period End. NPRM Comment Period Extended. NPRM Comment Period Extended End. Final Rule ............ 01/11/10 03/12/10 75 FR 1302 04/11/12 05/11/12 77 FR 21714 01/07/13 78 FR 1119 Abstract: This rulemaking would update and clarify existing requirements by incorporating changes into the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) based on PHMSA’s own initiatives through an extensive review of the HMR and previously issued letters of interpretation. Specifically, among other provisions, PHMSA would provide for the continued use of approvals until final administrative action is taken, when a correct and completed application for approval renewal was received 60 days prior to expiration date; update various entries in the hazardous materials table and the corresponding special provisions; clarify the lab pack requirements for temperature controlled materials; correct an error in the HMR with regard to the inspection of cargo tank motor vehicles containing corrosive materials; and revise the training requirements to require that hazardous materials employers ensure their hazardous materials employee training records are available upon request to an authorized official of the Department of Transportation or the Department of Homeland Security. Timetable: 03/08/13 11/00/13 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Kevin Leary, Transportation Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8553, Email: kevin.leary@dot.gov. RIN: 2137–AE44 Action Date FR Cite NPRM .................. NPRM Comment Period End. Final Rule ............ Final Rule Effective. 04/26/12 06/25/12 77 FR 24885 03/11/13 05/10/13 78 FR 15303 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No. Agency Contact: Robert Benedict, Transportation Regulations Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–8553, Email: robert.benedict@dot.gov. RIN: 2137–AE78 BILLING CODE 4910–60–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) Maritime Administration (MARAD) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) 63. +Regulations To Be Followed by all Departments, Agencies, and Shippers Having Responsibility To Provide a Preference for U.S.-Flag Vessels in the Shipment of Cargoes on Ocean Vessels Legal Authority: 49 CFR 1.66; 46 app U.S.C. 1101; 46 app U.S.C. 1241; 46 U.S.C. 2302 (e)(1); Pub. L. 91–469 Completed Actions 62. Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR) (Completion of a Section 610 Review) Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 Long-Term Actions E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / Unified Agenda sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Abstract: This rulemaking would revise and clarify the Cargo Preference rules that have not been revised substantially since 1971. Revisions would include an updated purpose and definitions section along with the removal of obsolete provisions. This rulemaking also would establish a new Part 383 to implement the Cargo Preference regulations. This rulemaking would cover Public Law 110–417, section 3511, National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009 changes to the cargo preference rules. The rulemaking would also provide for VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:38 Jul 22, 2013 Jkt 229001 compromise, assessment, mitigation, settlement, and collection of civil penalties. Originally the agency had two separate rulemakings in process under RIN 2133–AB74 and 2133–AB75. RIN 2133–AB74 would have revised existing regulations and RIN 2133–AB75 would have established a new part 383: Guidance and Civil Penalties and implement Public Law 110–417, section 3511, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2009. MARAD has decided it would be more efficient to merge both efforts under one; RIN 2133–AB75 has been merged with this action. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 44305 Timetable: Next Action Undetermined. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes. Agency Contact: Dennis Brennan, Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366–1029, Email: dennis.brennan@dot.gov. RIN: 2133–AB74 [FR Doc. 2013–17066 Filed 7–22–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–81–P E:\FR\FM\23JYP13.SGM 23JYP13

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 23, 2013)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 44287-44305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17066]



[[Page 44287]]

Vol. 78

Tuesday,

No. 141

July 23, 2013

Part XIII





Department of Transportation





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





Semiannual Regulatory Agenda

Federal Register / Vol. 78 , No. 141 / Tuesday, July 23, 2013 / 
Unified Agenda

[[Page 44288]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

14 CFR Chs. I-III

23 CFR Chs. I-III

33 CFR Chs. I and IV

46 CFR Chs. I-III

48 CFR Ch. 12

49 CFR Subtitle A, Chs. I-VI, and Chs. X-XII

[OST Docket 99-5129]


Department Regulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Regulatory Agenda is a semiannual summary of all current 
and projected rulemakings, reviews of existing regulations, and 
completed actions of the Department. The intent of the Agenda is to 
provide the public with information about the Department of 
Transportation's regulatory activity planned for the next 12 months. It 
is expected that this information will enable the public to be more 
aware of and allow it to more effectively participate in the 
Department's regulatory activity. The public is also invited to submit 
comments on any aspect of this Agenda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

General

    You should direct all comments and inquiries on the Agenda in 
general to Brett Jortland, Acting Assistant General Counsel for 
Regulation and Enforcement, Department of Transportation, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; 202 366-4723.

Specific

    You should direct all comments and inquiries on particular items in 
the Agenda to the individual listed for the regulation or the general 
rulemaking contact person for the operating administration in appendix 
B. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) 
may call 202 755-7687.

Table of Contents

Supplementary Information
    Background
    Significant/Priority Rulemakings
    Explanation of Information on the Agenda
    Request for Comments
    Purpose
Appendix A--Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory 
Documents
Appendix B--General Rulemaking Contact Persons
Appendix C--Public Rulemaking Dockets
Appendix D--Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Improvement of our regulations is a prime goal of the Department of 
Transportation (Department or DOT). Our regulations should be clear, 
simple, timely, fair, reasonable, and necessary. They should not be 
issued without appropriate involvement of the public; once issued, they 
should be periodically reviewed and revised, as needed, to assure that 
they continue to meet the needs for which they originally were 
designed. To view additional information about the Department of 
Transportation's regulatory activities online, go to https://www.dot.gov/regulations. Among other things, this Web site provides a 
report, updated monthly, on the status of the DOT significant 
rulemakings listed in the semiannual regulatory agenda.
    To help the Department achieve these goals and in accordance with 
Executive Order (EO) 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' (58 FR 
51735; Oct. 4, 1993) and the Department's Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034; Feb. 26, 1979), the Department prepares a 
semiannual regulatory agenda. It summarizes all current and projected 
rulemaking, reviews of existing regulations, and completed actions of 
the Department. These are matters on which action has begun or is 
projected during the succeeding 12 months or such longer period as may 
be anticipated or for which action has been completed since the last 
Agenda.
    The Agendas are based on reports submitted by the offices 
initiating the rulemaking and are reviewed by the Department 
Regulations Council.
    The Internet is the basic means for disseminating the Unified 
Agenda. The complete Unified Agenda is available online at 
www.reginfo.gov, in a format that offers users a greatly enhanced 
ability to obtain information from the Agenda database.
    Because publication in the Federal Register is mandated for the 
regulatory flexibility agendas required by the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (5 U.S.C. 602), DOT's printed Agenda entries include only:
    1. The agency's Agenda preamble;
    2. Rules that are in the agency's regulatory flexibility agenda, in 
accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, because they are likely 
to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities; and
    3. Any rules that the agency has identified for periodic review 
under section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    Printing of these entries is limited to fields that contain 
information required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act's Agenda 
requirements. These elements are: Sequence Number; Title; Section 610 
Review, if applicable; Legal Authority; Abstract; Timetable; Regulatory 
Flexibility Analysis Required; Agency Contact; and Regulation 
Identifier Number (RIN). Additional information (for detailed list see 
section heading ``Explanation of Information on the Agenda'') on these 
entries is available in the Unified Agenda published on the Internet.

Significant/Priority Rulemakings

    The Agenda covers all rules and regulations of the Department. We 
have classified rules as a DOT agency priority in the Agenda if they 
are, essentially, very costly, beneficial, controversial, or of 
substantial public interest under our Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures. All DOT agency priority rulemaking documents are subject to 
review by the Secretary of Transportation. If the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) decides a rule is subject to its review under 
Executive Order 12866, we have classified it as significant in the 
Agenda.

Explanation of Information on the Agenda

    An Office of Management and Budget memorandum, dated March 28, 
2013, requires the format for this Agenda.
    First, the Agenda is divided by initiating offices. Then, the 
Agenda is divided into five categories: (1) Prerule stage, (2) proposed 
rule stage, (3) final rule stage, (4) long-term actions, and (5) 
completed actions. For each entry, the Agenda provides the following 
information: (1) its ``significance''; (2) a short, descriptive title; 
(3) its legal basis; (4) the related regulatory citation in the Code of 
Federal Regulations; (5) any legal deadline and, if so, for what action 
(e.g., NPRM, final rule); (6) an abstract; (7) a timetable, including 
the earliest expected date for a decision on whether to take the 
action; (8) whether the rulemaking will affect small entities and/or 
levels of government and, if so, which categories; (9) whether a 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis is required (for rules that 
would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities); (10) a listing of any analyses an office

[[Page 44289]]

will prepare or has prepared for the action (with minor exceptions, DOT 
requires an economic analysis for all its rulemakings); (11) an agency 
contact office or official who can provide further information; (12) a 
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) assigned to identify an individual 
rulemaking in the Agenda and facilitate tracing further action on the 
issue; (13) whether the action is subject to the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act; (14) whether the action is subject to the Energy Act; and 
(15) whether the action is major under the congressional review 
provisions of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. 
If there is information that does not fit in the other categories, it 
will be included under a separate heading entitled ``Additional 
Information.'' One such example of this is the letters ``SB,'' ``IC,'' 
``SLT.'' These refer to information used as part of our required 
reports on Retrospective Review of DOT rulemakings. A ``Y'' or an 
``N,'' for yes and no, respectively, follow the letters to indicate 
whether or not a particular rulemaking would have effects on: small 
businesses (SB); information collections (IC); or State, local, or 
tribal (SLT) governments.
    For nonsignificant regulations issued routinely and frequently as a 
part of an established body of technical requirements (such as the 
Federal Aviation Administration's Airspace Rules), to keep those 
requirements operationally current, we only include the general 
category of the regulations, the identity of a contact office or 
official, and an indication of the expected number of regulations; we 
do not list individual regulations.
    In the ``Timetable'' column, we use abbreviations to indicate the 
particular documents being considered. ANPRM stands for Advance Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, SNPRM for Supplemental Notice of Proposed 
Rulemaking, and NPRM for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Listing a 
future date in this column does not mean we have made a decision to 
issue a document; it is the earliest date on which we expect to make a 
decision on whether to issue it. In addition, these dates are based on 
current schedules. Information received subsequent to the issuance of 
this Agenda could result in a decision not to take regulatory action or 
in changes to proposed publication dates. For example, the need for 
further evaluation could result in a later publication date; evidence 
of a greater need for the regulation could result in an earlier 
publication date.
    Finally, a dot () preceding an entry indicates that the 
entry appears in the Agenda for the first time.

Request for Comments

General

    Our agenda is intended primarily for the use of the public. Since 
its inception, we have made modifications and refinements that we 
believe provide the public with more helpful information, as well as 
make the Agenda easier to use. We would like you, the public, to make 
suggestions or comments on how the Agenda could be further improved.

Reviews

    We also seek your suggestions on which of our existing regulations 
you believe need to be reviewed to determine whether they should be 
revised or revoked. We particularly draw your attention to the 
Department's review plan in appendix D. In response to Executive Order 
13563 ``Retrospective Review and Analysis of Existing Rules,'' we have 
prepared a retrospective review plan providing more detail on the 
process we use to conduct reviews of existing rules, including changes 
in response to Executive Order 13563. We provided the public 
opportunities to comment at www.regulations.gov and IdeaScale on both 
our process and any existing DOT rules the public thought needed 
review. The plan and the results of our review can be found at https://www.dot.gov/regulations.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department is especially interested in obtaining information on 
requirements that have a ``significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities'' and, therefore, must be reviewed under the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act. If you have any suggested regulations, 
please submit them to us, along with your explanation of why they 
should be reviewed.
    In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, comments are 
specifically invited on regulations that we have targeted for review 
under section 610 of the Act. The phrase (sec. 610 Review) appears at 
the end of the title for these reviews. Please see appendix D for the 
Department's section 610 review plans.

Consultation With State, Local, and Tribal Governments

    Executive Orders 13132 and 13175 require us to develop an 
accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input'' by State, 
local, and tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies 
that have federalism or tribal implications. These policies are defined 
in the Executive orders to include regulations that have ``substantial 
direct effects'' on States or Indian tribes, on the relationship 
between the Federal Government and them, or on the distribution of 
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and various 
levels of government or Indian tribes. Therefore, we encourage State 
and local governments or Indian tribes to provide us with information 
about how the Department's rulemakings impact them.

Purpose

    The Department is publishing this regulatory Agenda in the Federal 
Register to share with interested members of the public the 
Department's preliminary expectations regarding its future regulatory 
actions. This should enable the public to be more aware of the 
Department's regulatory activity and should result in more effective 
public participation. This publication in the Federal Register does not 
impose any binding obligation on the Department or any of the offices 
within the Department with regard to any specific item on the Agenda. 
Regulatory action, in addition to the items listed, is not precluded.

    Dated: April 29, 2013.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.

Appendix A--Instructions for Obtaining Copies of Regulatory Documents

    To obtain a copy of a specific regulatory document in the Agenda, 
you should communicate directly with the contact person listed with the 
regulation at the address below. We note that most, if not all, such 
documents, including the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, are available 
through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. See appendix C for 
more information.
    (Name of contact person), (Name of the DOT agency), 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. (For the Federal Aviation 
Administration, substitute the following address: Office of Rulemaking, 
ARM-1, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591).

Appendix B--General Rulemaking Contact Persons

    The following is a list of persons who can be contacted within the 
Department for general information concerning the rulemaking process 
within the various operating administrations.

FAA--Mark Bury, Acting Chief Counsel, International Law, Legislation 
and Regulations Division, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room

[[Page 44290]]

915A, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3110.
FHWA--Jennifer Outhouse, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0761.
FMCSA--Steven J. LaFreniere, Regulatory Ombudsman, 1200 New Jersey 
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0596.
NHTSA--Steve Wood, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-2992.
FRA--Kathryn Shelton, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 
SE., Room W31-214, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 493-6063.
FTA--Richard Wong, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Room E56-308, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-0675.
SLSDC--Carrie Mann Lavigne, Chief Counsel, 180 Andrews Street, Massena, 
NY 13662; telephone (315) 764-3200.
PHMSA--Patricia Burke, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 
SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4400.
MARAD--Christine Gurland, Office of Chief Counsel, Maritime 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; 
telephone (202) 366-5157.
RITA--Robert Monniere, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 
SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-5498.
OST--Brett Jortland, Office of Regulation and Enforcement, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 366-4723.

Appendix C--Public Rulemaking Dockets

    All comments via the Internet are submitted through the Federal 
Docket Management System (FDMS) at the following address: https://www.regulations.gov. The FDMS allows the public to search, view, 
download, and comment on all Federal agency rulemaking documents in one 
central online system. The above referenced Internet address also 
allows the public to sign up to receive notification when certain 
documents are placed in the dockets.
    The public also may review regulatory dockets at, or deliver 
comments on proposed rulemakings to, the Dockets Office at 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, 1-800-647-5527. 
Working Hours: 9-5.

Appendix D--Review Plans for Section 610 and Other Requirements

Part I--The Plan

General

    The Department of Transportation has long recognized the importance 
of regularly reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether 
they need to be revised or revoked. Our 1979 Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures require such reviews. We also have responsibilities under 
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and section 
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to conduct such reviews. This 
includes the use of plain language techniques in new rules and 
considering its use in existing rules when we have the opportunity and 
resources to permit its use. We are committed to continuing our reviews 
of existing rules and, if needed, will initiate rulemaking actions 
based on these reviews.
    In accordance with Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation 
and Regulatory Review,'' issued by the President on January 18, 2011, 
the Department has added other elements to its review plan. The 
Department has decided to improve its plan by adding special oversight 
processes within the Department; encouraging effective and timely 
reviews, including providing additional guidance on particular problems 
that warrant review; and expanding opportunities for public 
participation. These new actions are in addition to the other steps 
described in this appendix.

Section 610 Review Plan

    Section 610 requires that we conduct reviews of rules that: (1) 
Have been published within the last 10 years, and (2) have a 
``significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities'' (SEIOSNOSE). It also requires that we publish in the Federal 
Register each year a list of any such rules that we will review during 
the next year. The Office of the Secretary and each of the Department's 
Operating Administrations have a 10-year review plan. These reviews 
comply with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Changes to the Review Plan

    Some reviews may be conducted earlier than scheduled. For example, 
to the extent resources permit, the plain language reviews will be 
conducted more quickly. Other events, such as accidents, may result in 
the need to conduct earlier reviews of some rules. Other factors may 
also result in the need to make changes; for example, we may make 
changes in response to public comment on this plan or in response to a 
presidentially-mandated review. If there is any change to the review 
plan, we will note the change in the following Agenda. For any section 
610 review, we will provide the required notice prior to the review.

Part II--The Review Process

The Analysis

    Generally, the agencies have divided their rules into 10 different 
groups and plan to analyze one group each year. For purposes of these 
reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall schedule for 
publication of the Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (2008) begins in the fall of 
2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 (2009) begins in the fall of 
2009 and ends in the fall of 2010, and so on. We request public comment 
on the timing of the reviews. For example, is there a reason for 
scheduling an analysis and review for a particular rule earlier than we 
have? Any comments concerning the plan or particular analyses should be 
submitted to the regulatory contacts listed in Appendix B, General 
Rulemaking Contact Persons.

Section 610 Review

    The agency will analyze each of the rules in a given year's group 
to determine whether any rule has a SEIOSNOSE and, thus, requires 
review in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act. The level of analysis will, of course, depend on the nature of the 
rule and its applicability. Publication of agencies' section 610 
analyses listed each fall in this Agenda provides the public with 
notice and an opportunity to comment consistent with the requirements 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We request that public comments be 
submitted to us early in the analysis year concerning the small entity 
impact of the rules to help us in making our determinations.
    In each fall Agenda, the agency will publish the results of the 
analyses it has completed during the previous year. For rules that had 
a negative finding on SEIOSNOSE, we will give a short explanation 
(e.g., ``these rules only establish petition processes that have no 
cost impact'' or ``these rules do not apply to any small entities''). 
For parts, subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a 
SEIOSNOSE, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal section 
610 review during the following 12 months. At this stage, we will add 
an entry to the Agenda in the prerulemaking section describing the 
review in more detail. We also will seek public comment on how

[[Page 44291]]

best to lessen the impact of these rules and provide a name or docket 
to which public comments can be submitted. In some cases, the section 
610 review may be part of another unrelated review of the rule. In such 
a case, we plan to clearly indicate which parts of the review are being 
conducted under section 610.

Other Reviews

    The agency will also examine the specified rules to determine 
whether any other reasons exist for revising or revoking the rule or 
for rewriting the rule in plain language. In each fall Agenda, the 
agency will also publish information on the results of the examinations 
completed during the previous year.

Part III--List of Pending Section 610 Reviews

    The Agenda identifies the pending DOT section 610 Reviews by 
inserting ``(Section 610 Review),'' after the title for the specific 
entry. For further information on the pending reviews, see the Agenda 
entries at www.reginfo.gov. For example, to obtain a list of all 
entries that is section 610 Reviews under the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act, a user would select the desired responses on the search screen (by 
selecting ``advanced search'') and, in effect, generate the desired 
``index'' of reviews.

                                             Office of the Secretary
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  49 CFR parts 91 through 99 and 14 CFR              2008              2009
                                        parts 200 through 212.
2....................................  48 CFR parts 1201 through 1253 and                 2009              2010
                                        new parts and subparts.
3....................................  14 CFR parts 213 through 232.........              2010              2011
4....................................  14 CFR parts 234 through 254.........              2011              2012
5....................................  14 CFR parts 255 through 298 and 49                2012              2013
                                        CFR part 40.
6....................................  14 CFR parts 300 through 373.........              2013              2014
7....................................  14 CFR parts 374 through 398.........              2014              2015
8....................................  14 CFR part 399 and 49 CFR parts 1                 2015              2016
                                        through 11.
9....................................  49 CFR parts 17 through 28...........              2016              2017
10...................................  49 CFR parts 29 through 39 and parts               2017              2018
                                        41 through 89.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules analyzed and summary of results

49 CFR part 95--Advisory Committees
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
     General: The agency plans to remove part 95 because it has 
been made obsolete by other laws, regulations, and agency procedures. 
Removal of these regulations would be cost effective and impose no 
burdens. Since the regulations will be removed, a review for plain 
language is not necessary.

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis

49 CFR part 91--International Air Transportation Fair Competitive 
Practices
49 CFR part 92--Recovering Debts to the United States by Salary Offset
49 CFR part 98--Enforcement of Restrictions on Post-Employment 
Activities
49 CFR part 99--Employee Responsibilities and Conduct
14 CFR part 200--Definitions and Instructions
14 CFR part 201--Air Carrier Authority Under Subtitle VII of Title 49 
of the United States Code [Amended]
14 CFR part 203--Waiver of Warsaw Convention Liability Limits and 
Defenses
14 CFR part 204--Data To Support Fitness Determinations
14 CFR part 205--Aircraft Accident Liability Insurance
14 CFR part 206--Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity: 
Special Authorizations and Exemptions
14 CFR part 207--Charter Trips by U.S. Scheduled Air Carriers
14 CFR part 208--Charter Trips by U.S. Charter Air Carriers
14 CFR part 211--Applications for Permits to Foreign Air Carriers
14 CFR part 212--Charter Rules for U.S. and Foreign Direct Air Carriers

Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 213--Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air 
Carrier Permits
14 CFR part 214--Terms, Conditions, and Limitations of Foreign Air 
Carrier Permits Authorizing Charter Transportation Only
14 CFR part 215--Use and Change of Names of Air Carriers, Foreign Air 
Carriers, and Commuter Air Carriers
14 CFR part 216--Comingling of Blind Sector Traffic by Foreign Air 
Carriers
14 CFR part 217--Reporting Traffic Statistics by Foreign Air Carriers 
in Civilian Scheduled, Charter, and Nonscheduled Services
14 CFR part 218--Lease by Foreign Air Carrier or Other Foreign Person 
of Aircraft With Crew
14 CFR part 221--Tariffs
14 CFR part 222--Intermodal Cargo Services by Foreign Air Carriers
14 CFR part 223--Free and Reduced-Rate Transportation
14 CFR part 232--Transportation of Mail, Review of Orders of Postmaster 
General

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and summary of results

14 CFR part 234--Airline Service Quality Performance Reports
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing 
rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of 
small entities.
     General: The Department is anticipating proposing changes 
to the existing rule to expand the on-time performance ``reporting 
carrier'' pool to include smaller carriers to enable the Department to 
obtain and provide to the flying public a more complete picture of the 
performance of scheduled passenger service in general. Also, in July 
2011, the Department proposed to change the way the Department computes 
mishandled baggage rates from mishandled baggage reports per domestic 
enplanement to mishandled bags per checked bags as the Department 
believes that the current matrix for comparing airline mishandled 
baggage information is outdated. OST's plain language review indicates 
no need for substantial

[[Page 44292]]

revision.
14 CFR part 250--Oversales
     Section 610: Certain elements of this existing rule impose 
requirements on certain small air carriers but the Department has 
determined that the economic impact is not significant.
     General: The Department made some changes to this part in 
April 2008 and April 2011. No additional changes are needed. These 
regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden as all air 
carriers have control over the extent to which the rule impacts them 
because they control their own overbooking rates. OST's plain language 
review indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 252--Smoking Aboard Aircraft
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing 
rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of 
small entities.
     General: In September 2011, the Department proposed to 
change the existing rule to explicitly ban the smoking of electronic 
cigarettes on air carriers and foreign air carrier flights in scheduled 
intrastate, interstate, and foreign air transportation. The Department 
is also considering banning smoking on charter flights with 19 or more 
passenger seats in part out of concern about the health effects of 
secondhand smoke on flight attendants aboard such flights. Carriers 
that provide air transportation exclusively with aircraft that seat no 
more than 60 passenger seats are considered to be small entities. OST's 
plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 253--Notice of Terms of Contract of Carriage
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing 
rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of 
small entities.
     General: A minor change to a provision in this part 
regarding retroactive changes to contracts of carriage was finalized in 
2009. No additional changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective. OST's plain language review indicates no need for 
substantial revision.
14 CFR part 254--Domestic Baggage Liability
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing 
rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of 
small entities.
     General: The Department periodically raises the minimum 
limit on domestic baggage liability applicable to air carriers to 
reflect inflation. The Department anticipates adjusting the minimum 
limit of liability from the current amount of $3,300 announced by the 
Department in November 2008 to $3,400, to take into account the changes 
in consumer prices since the prior revision. This revision would affect 
only flight segments operated with large aircraft and other flight 
segments appearing on the same ticket as a large-aircraft segment. As a 
result, many operations of small entities, such as air taxis and many 
commuter air carriers, would not be covered by the rule. OST's plain 
language review indicates no need for substantial revision.

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 240--Inspection of Accounts and Property
14 CFR part 241--Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large 
Certificated Air Carriers
14 CFR part 243--Passenger Manifest Information
14 CFR part 247--Direct Airport-to-Airport Mileage Records
14 CFR part 248--Submission of Audit Reports
14 CFR part 249--Preservation of Air Carrier Records

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules to be analyzed during the next year

14 CFR part 255--Airline Computer Reservations Systems
14 CFR part 256--[Reserved]
14 CFR part 271--Guidelines for Subsidizing Air Carriers Providing 
Essential Air Transportation
14 CFR part 272--Essential Air Service to the Freely Associated States
14 CFR part 291--Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation
14 CFR part 292--International Cargo Transportation
14 CFR part 293--International Passenger Transportation
14 CFR part 294--Canadian Charter Air Taxi Operators
14 CFR part 296--Indirect Air Transportation of Property
14 CFR part 297--Foreign Air Freight Forwarders and Foreign Cooperative 
Shippers Associations
14 CFR part 298--Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air Carrier 
Operations

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

14 CFR part 257--Disclosure of Code-Sharing Arrangements and Long-Term 
Wet Leases
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the existing 
rule does not have a significant effect on a substantial number of 
small entities.
     General: The Department is anticipating proposing changes 
to the existing rule to codify the requirements in a statute (49 U.S.C. 
41712(c)) and the Department's enforcement policy with respect to Web 
site disclosure of code-share and long-term wet lease arrangements. 
OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 258--Disclosure of Change-of-Gauge Services
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does 
not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small 
entities.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review 
indicates no need for substantial revision.
    14 CFR part 259--Enhanced Protections for Airline Passengers
     Section 610: This rule imposes requirements on small air 
carriers but the Department believes that the economic impact will not 
be significant.
     General: The Department is anticipating proposing changes 
to the existing rule to require comfortable cabin temperatures when 
there is a lengthy tarmac delay and to require a marketing carrier 
provide assistance to its code-share partner when a flight operated by 
the code-share partner experiences a lengthy tarmac delay. OST's plain 
language review indicates no need for substantial revision.

Federal Aviation Administration

Section 610 Review Plan

    The FAA has elected to use the two-step, 2-year process used by 
most DOT modes in past plans. As such, the FAA has divided its rules 
into 10 groups as displayed in the table below. During the first year 
(the ``analysis year''), all rules published during the previous 10 
years within a 10 percent block of the regulations will be analyzed to 
identify those with a SEIOSNOSE. During the second year (the ``review 
year''), each rule identified in the analysis year as

[[Page 44293]]

having a SEIONOSE will be reviewed in accordance with section 610(b) to 
determine if it should be continued without change or changed to 
minimize impact on small entities. Results of those reviews will be 
published in the DOT Semiannual Regulatory Agenda.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  14 CFR parts 119 through 129 and                   2008              2009
                                        parts 150 through 156.
2....................................  14 CFR parts 133 through 139 and                   2009              2010
                                        parts 157 through 169.
3....................................  14 CFR parts 141 through 147 and                   2010              2011
                                        parts 170 through 187.
4....................................  14 CFR parts 189 through 198 and                   2011              2012
                                        parts 1 through 16.
5....................................  14 CFR parts 17 through 33...........              2012              2013
6....................................  14 CFR parts 34 through 39 and parts               2013              2014
                                        400 through 405.
7....................................  14 CFR parts 43 through 49 and parts               2014              2015
                                        406 through 415.
8....................................  14 CFR parts 60 through 77...........              2015              2016
9....................................  14 CFR parts 91 through 105..........              2016              2017
10...................................  14 CFR parts 417 through 460.........              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 5 (2012) List of rules analyzed and summary of results

14 CFR part 17--Procedures for Protests and Contract Disputes
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 21--Certification Procedures for Products and Parts
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 23--Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, 
and Commuter Category Airplanes
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 25--Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found that the SEIOSNOSE no longer exists.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 26--Continued Airworthiness and Safety Improvements for 
Transport Category Airplanes
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 27--Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 29--Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Rotorcraft
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 31--Airworthiness Standards: Manned Free Balloons
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 33--Airworthiness Standards: Aircraft Engines
     Section 610: The agency conducted a section 610 review of 
this part and found no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FAA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.

Year 6 (2013) List of rules to be analyzed during the next year

14 CFR part 34--Fuel Venting and Exhaust Emission Requirements for 
Turbine Engine Powered Airplanes
14 CFR part 35--Airworthiness Standards: Propellers
14 CFR part 36--Noise Standards: Aircraft Type and Airworthiness 
Certification
14 CFR part 39--Airworthiness Directives
14 CFR part 400--Basis and Scope
14 CFR part 401--Organization and Definitions
14 CFR part 404--Regulations and Licensing Requirements
14 CFR part 405--Investigations and Enforcement

                                         Federal Highway Administration
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  None.................................              2008              2009
2....................................  23 CFR parts 1 to 260................              2009              2010

[[Page 44294]]

 
3....................................  23 CFR parts 420 to 470..............              2010              2011
4....................................  23 CFR part 500......................              2011              2012
5....................................  23 CFR parts 620 to 637..............              2012              2013
6....................................  23 CFR parts 645 to 669..............              2013              2014
7....................................  23 CFR parts 710 to 924..............              2014              2015
8....................................  23 CFR parts 940 to 973..............              2015              2016
9....................................  23 CFR parts 1200 to 1252............              2016              2017
10...................................  New parts and subparts...............              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal-Aid Highway Program

    The FHWA has adopted regulations in title 23 of the CFR, chapter I, 
related to the Federal-Aid Highway Program. These regulations implement 
and carry out the provisions of Federal law relating to the 
administration of Federal aid for highways. The primary law authorizing 
Federal aid for highways is chapter I of title 23 of the U.S.C. section 
145 of title 23 expressly provides for a federally assisted State 
program. For this reason, the regulations adopted by the FHWA in title 
23 of the CFR primarily relate to the requirements that States must 
meet to receive Federal funds for the construction and other work 
related to highways. Because the regulations in title 23 primarily 
relate to States, which are not defined as small entities under the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act, the FHWA believes that its regulations in 
title 23 do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. The FHWA solicits public comment on this 
preliminary conclusion.

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

23 CFR part 500--Management and Monitoring Systems
     Section 610: No SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are affected.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FHWA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next 
year

23 CFR part 620--Engineering
23 CFR part 625--Design Standards for Highways
23 CFR part 626--Pavement Policy
23 CFR part 627--Value Engineering
23 CFR part 630--Preconstruction Procedures
23 CFR part 633--Required Contract Provisions
23 CFR part 635--Construction and Maintenance
23 CFR part 636--Design-build Contracting
23 CFR part 637--Construction Inspection and Approval

                                   Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  49 CFR part 372, subpart A...........              2008              2009
2....................................  49 CFR part 386......................              2009              2010
3....................................  49 CFR parts 325 and 390 (General)...              2010              2011
4....................................  49 CFR parts 390 (Small Passenger-                 2011              2012
                                        Carrying Vehicles), 391 to 393 and
                                        396 to 399.
5....................................  49 CFR part 387......................              2012              2013
6....................................  49 CFR parts 356, 367, 369 to 371,                 2013              2014
                                        372 (subparts B and C).
7....................................  49 CFR parts 373, 374, 376, and 379..              2014              2015
8....................................  49 CFR parts 360, 365, 366, and 368..              2015              2016
9....................................  49 CFR parts 377, 378................              2016              2017
10...................................  49 CFR part 395......................              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

49 CFR Part 372--Exemptions From the Operating Authority Regulations 
Applicable to For-Hire Motor Carriers
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. No small entities are 
affected.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations provide 
exemptions from the requirements for certain for-hire motor carriers to 
apply for operating authority from FMCSA. The regulations reduce the 
regulatory burden on small businesses by enabling certain for-hire 
carriers to conduct business without being required to apply for 
operating authority. The regulations are cost effective and impose the 
least burden. FMCSA's plain language review of these rules indicates no 
need for substantive revision.

Year 2 (fall 2009) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

49 CFR part 386--Rules of Practice for Motor Carrier, Broker, Freight 
Forwarder, and Hazardous Materials Proceedings
     Section 610: There is a SEIOSNOSE, as a significant number 
of small entities may be affected by legal fees and safety consultants' 
fees associated with preparing an adequate response to FMCSA notices of 
claims and notices of violations and the submission of corrective 
action plans following an unsuccessful new entrant audit or compliance 
review. It was found that the cost for legal representation and other 
costs for a formal hearing to appeal a decision may have a significant 
impact on small firms. However, these proceedings would only come about 
if the regulated entity failed to comply with applicable Federal

[[Page 44295]]

regulations and FMCSA initiated enforcement action as a result of non-
compliance.

 Subpart D, ``General Rules and Hearings,'' addresses rules and 
procedures for the conduct of formal hearings. The principal economic 
impact of part 386 is the cost to a small firm of defending itself 
under these procedures. However, as noted above, carriers that achieve 
compliance with FMCSA's commercial and safety regulations would not be 
subject to enforcement actions and therefore would not undergo such 
procedures.
     General: The Agency considered whether the rules of 
practice impose unnecessary burdens on small businesses that undergo 
enforcement actions as a result of non-compliance with the Agency's 
commercial and safety regulations. The Agency concluded that the rules 
of practice do not impose unnecessary burdens on such businesses when 
they achieve compliance with the applicable safety and hazardous 
materials regulations.

Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis

49 CFR part 325--Compliance with Interstate Motor Carrier Noise 
Emission
49 CFR part 390 -- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, General

     This rule was moved up from Year 4 as a result of the 
Department's Retrospective Regulatory Review.

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

49 CFR part 391--Driver Qualifications
49 CFR part 392--Driving of Commercial Motor Vehicles
49 CFR part 393--Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation
49 CFR part 396--Inspection, Repair and Maintenance of Commercial Motor 
Vehicles
49 CFR part 397--Transportation of Hazardous Materials; Driving and 
Parking Rules
49 CFR part 398--Transportation of Migrant Workers
49 CFR part 399--Employee Safety and Health Standards

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed this year

49 CFR Part 387--Minimum Levels of Financial Responsibility for Motor 
Carriers

                                 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  49 CFR parts 571.223 through 571.500,              2008              2009
                                        and parts 575 and 579.
2....................................  23 CFR parts 1200 through 1300.......              2009              2010
3....................................  49 CFR parts 501 through 526 and                   2010              2011
                                        571.213.
4....................................  49 CFR parts 571.131, 571.217,                     2011              2012
                                        571.220, 571.221, and 571.222.
5....................................  49 CFR parts 571.101 through 571.110,              2012              2013
                                        and 571.135, 571.138, and 571.139.
6....................................  49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except               2013              2014
                                        parts 571 and 575.
7....................................  49 CFR parts 571.111 through 571.129               2014              2015
                                        and parts 580 through 588.
8....................................  49 CFR parts 571.201 through 571.212.              2015              2016
9....................................  49 CFR parts 571.214 through 571.219,              2016              2017
                                        except 571.217.
10...................................  49 CFR parts 591 through 595 and new               2017              2018
                                        parts and subparts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of the results

49 CFR Part 571.131--School Bus Pedestrian Safety Devices
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 571.217--Bus Emergency Exits and Window Retention and 
Release
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 571.220--School Bus Rollover Protection
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 571.221--School Bus Body Joint Strength
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 571.222--School Bus Passenger Seating and Crash Protection
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. NHTSA's plain language review of 
these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next 
year

49 CFR part 571.101--Controls and Displays
49 CFR part 571.102--Transmission Shift Position Sequence, Starter 
Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect
49 CFR part 571.103--Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems
49 CFR part 571.104--Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems
49 CFR part 571.105--Hydraulic and Electric Brake Systems
49 CFR part 571.106--Brake Hoses
49 CFR part 571.107--[Reserved]
49 CFR part 571.108--Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated 
Equipment
49 CFR part 571.109--New Pneumatic and Certain Specialty Tires
49 CFR part 571.110--Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation 
Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles 
with a GVWR of 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 Pounds) or Less
49 CFR part 571.135--Light Vehicle Brake Systems

[[Page 44296]]

49 CFR part 571.138--Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems
49 CFR part 571.139--New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles

                                         Federal Railroad Administration
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  49 CFR parts 200 and 201.............              2008              2009
2....................................  49 CFR parts 207, 209, 211, 215, 238,              2009              2010
                                        and 256.
3....................................  49 CFR parts 210, 212, 214, 217, and               2010              2011
                                        268.
4....................................  49 CFR part 219......................              2011              2012
5....................................  49 CFR parts 218, 221, 241, and 244..              2012              2013
6....................................  49 CFR parts 216, 228, and 229.......              2013              2014
7....................................  49 CFR parts 223 and 233.............              2014              2015
8....................................  49 CFR parts 224, 225, 231, and 234..              2015              2016
9....................................  49 CFR parts 222, 227, 235, 236, 250,              2016              2017
                                        260, and 266.
10...................................  49 CFR parts 213, 220, 230, 232, 239,              2017              2018
                                        240, and 265.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

49 CFR part 219--Control of Alcohol and Drug Use
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE.
     General: No changes are needed. This rule is cost 
effective and imposes the least burden. FRA's plain language review of 
this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed during next 
year

49 CFR part 218--Control of Alcohol and Drug Use
49 CFR part 221--Rear End Marking Device Passenger, Commuter, and 
Freight Trains
49 CFR part 241--United States Locational Requirement for Dispatching 
of United States Rail Operations
49 CFR part 244--Regulations on Safety Integration Plans Governing 
Railroad Consolidations, Mergers, and Acquisitions of Control

                                         Federal Transit Administration
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  49 CFR parts 604, 605, and 633.......              2008              2009
2....................................  49 CFR parts 661 and 665.............              2009              2010
3....................................  49 CFR part 633......................              2010              2011
4....................................  49 CFR parts 609 and 611.............              2011              2012
5....................................  49 CFR parts 613 and 614.............              2012              2013
6....................................  49 CFR part 622......................              2013              2014
7....................................  49 CFR part 630......................              2014              2015
8....................................  49 CFR part 639......................              2015              2016
9....................................  49 CFR parts 659 and 663.............              2016              2017
10...................................  49 CFR part 665......................              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules analyzed and summary of results

49 CFR part 605--School Bus Operations
     Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule does 
not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small 
entities.
     General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost 
effective and impose the least burden. FTA's plain language review 
indicates no need for substantial revision.

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

49 CFR part 609--Transportation for Elderly and Handicapped Persons

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rule(s) that will be analyzed during the 
next year

49 CFR part 613--Planning Assistance and Standards
49 CFR part 614--Transportation Infrastructure Management

                                             Maritime Administration
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  46 CFR parts 201 through 205.........              2008              2009
2....................................  46 CFR parts 221 through 232.........              2009              2010
3....................................  46 CFR parts 249 through 296.........              2010              2011
4....................................  46 CFR parts 221, 298, 308, and 309..              2011              2012
5....................................  46 CFR parts 307 through 309.........              2012              2013
6....................................  46 CFR part 310......................              2013              2014

[[Page 44297]]

 
7....................................  46 CFR parts 315 through 340.........              2014              2015
8....................................  46 CFR parts 345 through 381.........              2015              2016
9....................................  46 CFR parts 382 through 389.........              2016              2017
10...................................  46 CFR parts 390 through 393.........              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

46 CFR part 381--Cargo Preference--U.S.-Flag Vessels
46 CFR part 383--Cargo Preference--Compromise, Assessment, Mitigation, 
Settlement & Collection of Civil Penalties
46 CFR part 221--Foreign Transfer Regulations
46 CFR part 249--Approval of Underwriters for Marine Hull Insurance
46 CFR part 272--Requirements and Procedures for Conducting Condition 
Surveys and Administering Maintenance and Repair Subsidy
46 CFR part 287--Establishment of Construction Reserve Funds
46 CFR part 295--Maritime Security Program (MSP)
46 CFR part 296--Maritime Security Program (MSP)

Year 5 (2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next year

46 CFR part 307--Mandatory Position Report System for Vessels
46 CFR part 308--War Risk Insurance
46 CFR part 309--War Risk Ship Valuation

                         Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  49 CFR part 178......................              2008              2009
2....................................  49 CFR parts 178 through 180.........              2009              2010
3....................................  49 CFR parts 172 and 175.............              2010              2011
4....................................  49 CFR part 171, sections 171.15 and               2011              2012
                                        171.16.
5....................................  49 CFR parts 106, 107, 171, 190, and               2012              2013
                                        195.
6....................................  49 CFR parts 174, 177, 191, and 192..              2013              2014
7....................................  49 CFR parts 176 and 199.............              2014              2015
8....................................  49 CFR parts 172 through 178.........              2015              2016
9....................................  49 CFR parts 172, 173, 174, 176, 177,              2016              2017
                                        and 193.
10...................................  49 CFR parts 173 and 194.............              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules analyzed and a summary of results

49 CFR section 171.15--Immediate Notice of Certain Hazardous Materials 
Incidents
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Annually fewer than 
100 small entities are required to file a report telephonic report. 
Therefore, though some small entities may be affected the economic 
impact on small entities will not be significant.
     General: This rule prescribes requirements for the 
immediate notice of certain hazardous materials incidents by telephone 
to the National Response Center (NRC). The primary function of the 
National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of 
contact for reporting all oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and 
etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United 
States and its territories. In addition to gathering and distributing 
spill data for Federal On-Scene Coordinators and serving as the 
communications and operations center for the National Response Team, 
the NRC maintains agreements with a variety of Federal entities to make 
additional notifications regarding incidents meeting established 
trigger criteria. Section 171.15(b) establishes the trigger criteria 
for a reportable hazardous materials incident. PHMSA's plain language 
review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR section 171.16--Detailed Hazardous Materials Incident Reports
     Section 610: There is no SEIOSNOSE. Based on a review of 
detailed incident reports PHMSA found that only 3 percent of the nearly 
15,000 incidents reports submitted in FY2011 were filed by small 
entities. Therefore, though some small entities may be affected the 
economic impact on small entities will not be significant.
     General: This rule prescribes requirements for detailed 
hazardous materials incident reports. PHMSA relies on this data and 
information to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing regulations; 
determine the need for regulatory changes to cover changing 
transportation safety problems; and identify major problem areas that 
should receive priority attention. In addition, both government and 
industry use this information to chart trends, identify problems and 
training inadequacies, evaluate packaging, and assess ways to reduce 
hazardous materials releases. In FY2011 PHMSA accepted two petitions 
for rulemaking (P-1562; PHMSA-2010-0207 and P-1566; PHMSA-2010-0225) 
that request revisions to the incident reporting requirements. As a 
result of these petitions, PHMSA is currently conducting research to 
evaluate the effectiveness of the requirements for detailed hazardous 
materials incident reporting in section 171.16. PHMSA concluded this 
study in FY2012. Based on the

[[Page 44298]]

results of the study PHMSA is considering regulatory action to address 
its findings, the petitions, and simplify the incident reporting 
process. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need 
for substantial revision.

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next 
year

49 CFR part 106--Rulemaking Procedures
49 CFR part 107--Hazardous Materials Program Procedures
49 CFR part 171--General Information, Regulations, and Definitions
49 CFR part 190--Pipeline Safety Programs and Rulemaking Procedures
49 CFR part 195--Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline

                            Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA)
                                          Section 610 and Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed         Analysis year      Review year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  14 CFR part 241, form 41.............              2008              2009
2....................................  14 CFR part 241, schedule T-100, and               2009              2010
                                        part 217.
3....................................  14 CFR part 298......................              2010              2011
4....................................  14 CFR part 241, section 19-7........              2011              2012
5....................................  14 CFR part 291......................              2012              2013
6....................................  14 CFR part 234......................              2013              2014
7....................................  14 CFR part 249......................              2014              2015
8....................................  14 CFR part 248......................              2015              2016
9....................................  14 CFR part 250......................              2016              2017
10...................................  14 CFR part 374a, ICAO...............              2017              2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 241--Uniform System of Accounts and Reports for Large 
Certificated Air Carriers, Form 41

Year 3 (fall 2010) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 298, subpart f--Exemptions for Air Taxi and Commuter Air 
Carrier Operations--Reporting Requirements

Year 4 (fall 2011) List of rules with ongoing analysis

14 CFR part 241, section 19-7--Passenger Origin-Destination Survey

Year 5 (fall 2012) List of rules that will be analyzed during the next 
year

14 CFR part 291--Cargo Operations in Interstate Air Transportation

                                  Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
                                          Section 610 And Other Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Year                        Regulations to be reviewed        Analysis  year     Review  year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................  33 CFR parts 401 through 403.........              2008              2009
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Year 1 (fall 2008) List of rules with ongoing analysis

33 CFR part 401--Seaway Regulations and Rules
33 CFR part 402--Tariff of Tolls
33 CFR part 403--Rules of Procedure of the Joint Tolls Review Board

              Office of the Secretary--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
45........................  +Enhancing Airline                 2105-AE11
                             Passenger Protections III.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


                Office of the Secretary--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
46........................  +Use of the Seat-Strapping         2105-AD87
                             Method for Carrying a
                             Wheelchair on an Aircraft.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


[[Page 44299]]


          Federal Aviation Administration--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
47........................  +Operation and                     2120-AJ60
                             Certification of Small
                             Unmanned Aircraft Systems
                             (sUAS).
48........................  +Flight Crewmember                 2120-AJ87
                             Mentoring, Leadership and
                             Professional Development
                             (HR 5900).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


            Federal Aviation Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
49........................  +Pilot Certification and           2120-AJ67
                             Qualification
                             Requirements (Formerly
                             First Officer
                             Qualification
                             Requirements) (HR 5900).
50........................  +Safety Management Systems         2120-AJ86
                             for Certificate Holders
                             (Section 610 Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


           Federal Aviation Administration--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
51........................  +Air Carrier Maintenance           2120-AJ79
                             Training Program (Section
                             610 Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
52........................  +Commercial Driver's               2126-AB18
                             License Drug and Alcohol
                             Clearinghouse (MAP-21).
53........................  +Electronic Logging                2126-AB20
                             Devices and Hours of
                             Service Supporting
                             Documents (MAP-21).
54........................  +Inspection, Repair, and           2126-AB46
                             Maintenance; Driver-
                             Vehicle Inspection Report
                             (RRR).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


      Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
55........................  +Unified Registration              2126-AA22
                             System.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


     Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration--Completed Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
56........................  Self Reporting of Out-of-          2126-AB43
                             State Convictions (RRR)
                             (Section 610 Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------


          Federal Railroad Administration--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
57........................  +Risk Reduction Program...         2130-AC11
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


  Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration--Proposed Rule
                                  Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
58........................  +Pipeline Safety: Safety           2137-AE66
                             of On-Shore Liquid
                             Hazardous Pipelines.
59........................  Pipeline Safety: Issues            2137-AE93
                             Related To the Use of
                             Plastic Pipe in Gas
                             Pipeline Industry.
60........................  Pipeline Safety:                  2137-AE94
                             Miscellaneous Amendments
                             Related to
                             Reauthorization and
                             Petitions for Rulemaking
                             (RRR).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


[[Page 44300]]


Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
61........................  +Hazardous Materials:             2137-AE44
                             Revisions to Requirements
                             for the Transportation of
                             Lithium Batteries.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


    Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration--Completed
                                 Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
62........................  Hazardous Materials:               2137-AE78
                             Miscellaneous Amendments
                             (RRR) (Completion of a
                             Section 610 Review).
------------------------------------------------------------------------


               Maritime Administration--Long-Term Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Regulation
       Sequence No.                    Title             Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
63........................  + Regulations To Be               2133-AB74
                             Followed by All
                             Departments, Agencies,
                             and Shippers Having
                             Responsibility To Provide
                             a Preference for U.S.-
                             Flag Vessels in the
                             Shipment of Cargoes on
                             Ocean Vessels.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ DOT-designated significant regulation.


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Office of the Secretary (OST)

Proposed Rule Stage

45. + Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections III

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41712; 49 U.S.C. 40101;49 U.S.C. 41702
    Abstract: This rulemaking would address the following issues: (1) 
whether the Department should require a marketing carrier to provide 
assistance to its code-share partner when a flight operated by the 
code-share partner experiences a lengthy tarmac delay; (2) whether the 
Department should enhance disclosure requirements on code-share 
operations, including requiring on-time performance data, reporting of 
certain data code-share operations, and codifying the statutory 
amendment of 49 U.S.C. 41712(c) regarding Web site schedule disclosure 
of code-share operations; (3) whether the Department should expand the 
on-time performance ``reporting carrier'' pool to include smaller 
carriers; (4) whether the Department should require travel agents to 
adopt minimum customer service standards in relation to the sale of air 
transportation; (5) whether the Department should require ticket agents 
to disclose the carriers whose tickets they sell or do not sell and 
information regarding any incentive payments they receive in connection 
with the sale of air transportation; (6) whether the Department should 
require ticket agents to disclose any preferential display of 
individual fares or carriers in the ticket agent[acute]s Internet 
displays; (7) whether the Department should require additional or 
special disclosures regarding certain substantial fees, e.g., oversize 
or overweight baggage fees; (8) whether the Department should prohibit 
post-purchase price increase for all services and products not 
purchased with the ticket or whether it is sufficient to prohibit post-
purchase price increases for baggage charges that traditionally have 
been included in the ticket price; and (9) whether the Department 
should require that ancillary fees be displayed through all sale 
channels.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie, Attorney, Department of 
Transportation, Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-9342, TDD Phone: 202-755-7687, 
Fax: 202 366-7152, Email: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov.
    RIN: 2105-AE11

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Office of the Secretary (OST)

Final Rule Stage

46. + Use of the Seat-Strapping Method for Carrying A Wheelchair on an 
Aircraft

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41705
    Abstract: This rulemaking would address whether carriers should be 
allowed to utilize the seat-strapping method to stow a 
passenger[acute]s wheelchair in the aircraft cabin.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   06/03/11  76 FR 32107
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/02/11  .......................
Final Rule..........................   07/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Blane A. Workie, Attorney, Department of 
Transportation, Office of the Secretary, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-9342, TDD Phone: 202 755-7687, 
Fax: 202 366-7152, Email: blane.workie@ost.dot.gov.
    RIN: 2105-AD87.
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Proposed Rule Stage

47. +Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems 
(SUAS)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701; P.L. 112-95
    Abstract: This rulemaking would adopt specific rules for the 
operation of small unmanned aircraft systems in the National Airspace 
System (NAS). These changes would address the classification of small 
unmanned aircraft, certification of their pilots and visual observers, 
registration, approval

[[Page 44301]]

of operations, and operational limits in order to maintain the safety 
and efficiency of the NAS. This proposal addresses model aircraft 
operations as well. This rulemaking would require regular collection of 
safety data from the user community to enable the FAA to assess the 
effectiveness of these regulations and to integrate unmanned aircraft 
systems into the NAS in the future.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Stephen A Glowacki, Department of Transportation, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 385-4898, Email: 
stephen.a.glowacki@faa.gov.
    RIN: 2120-AJ60

48. +Flight Crewmember Mentoring, Leadership and Professional 
Development (HR 5900)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); Pub. L. 111-216, sec. 206
    Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the regulations for air 
carrier training programs under part 121. The action is necessary to 
ensure that air carriers establish or modify training programs that 
address mentoring, leadership, and professional development of flight 
crewmembers in part 121 operations. The amendments are intended to 
contribute significantly to airline safety by reducing aviation 
accidents and respond to the mandate in Public Law 111-216.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   10/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Deke Abbott, Department of Transportation, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20591, Phone: 202 267-8266, Email: deke.abbott@faa.gov.
    RIN: 2120-AJ87

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Final Rule Stage

49. +Pilot Certification and Qualification Requirements (Formerly First 
Officer Qualification Requirements) (HR 5900)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 35301 to 45302; 49 
U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 
U.S.C. 44701(a)(5); 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44703; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 
U.S.C. 44707; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C. 
44716; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 45102 to 45103; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 
U.S.C. 44717; Pub. L. 111-216
    Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the eligibility and 
qualification requirements for pilots engaged in part 121 air carrier 
operations. Additionally, it would modify the requirements for an 
airline transport pilot certificate. These actions are necessary 
because recent airline accidents and incidents have brought 
considerable attention to the experience level and training of air 
carrier flight crews. This rulemaking is a result of requirements in 
Public Law 111-216.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   02/08/10  75 FR 6164
ANPRM Comment Period End............   04/09/10  .......................
NPRM................................   02/29/12  77 FR 12374
NPRM Comment Period End.............   04/30/12  .......................
Final Rule..........................   07/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Barbara Adams, Department of Transportation, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, 
DC 20591, Phone: 202 267-8166, Email: barbara.adams@faa.gov.
    RIN: 2120-AJ67

50. +Safety Management Systems for Certificate Holders (Section 610 
Review)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 
40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 
44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 
U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C. 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 46105; Pub. 
L. 111-216, sec. 215
    Abstract: This rulemaking would require each certificate holder 
operating under 14 CFR part 121 to develop and implement a safety 
management system (SMS) to improve the safety of its aviation related 
activities. A safety management system is a comprehensive, process-
oriented approach to managing safety throughout an organization. An SMS 
includes an organization-wide safety policy; formal methods for 
identifying hazards, controlling, and continually assessing risk and 
safety performance; and promotion of a safety culture. SMS stresses not 
only compliance with technical standards but increased emphasis on the 
overall safety performance of the organization. This rulemaking is 
required under Public Law 111-216, sec. 215.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   11/05/10  75 FR 68224
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   01/31/11  76 FR 5296
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/03/11  .......................
Comment Period Extended.............   03/07/11  .......................
Final Rule..........................   10/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Scott VanBuren, Department of Transportation, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 494-8417, Email: 
scott.vanburen@faa.gov.
    RIN: 2120-AJ86

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

Long-Term Actions

51. +Air Carrier Maintenance Training Program (Section 610 Review)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 
40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44701; 49 U.S.C. 
44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 47111; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 
U.S.C. 44715; 49 U.S.C. 44716; 49 U.S.C. 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 
U.S.C. 46105
    Abstract: This rulemaking would require FAA approval of maintenance 
training programs of air carriers that operate aircraft type 
certificated for a passenger seating configuration of 10 seats or more 
(excluding any pilot seat). The intent of this rulemaking is to reduce 
the number of accidents and incidents caused by human error, improper 
maintenance, inspection, or repair practices.
    Timetable: Next Action Undetermined.

[[Page 44302]]

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Agency Contact: John J Hiles, Flight Standards Service, Department 
of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 950 L'Enfant Plaza 
North SW., Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202 385-6421, Email: 
john.j.hiles@faa.gov.
    RIN: 2120-AJ79
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)

Proposed Rule Stage

52. +Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (MAP-
21)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31306
    Abstract: This rulemaking would create a central database for 
verified positive controlled substances and alcohol test results for 
commercial driver's license (CDL) holders and refusals by such drivers 
to submit to testing. This rulemaking would require employers of CDL 
holders and service agents to report positive test results and refusals 
to test into the Clearinghouse. Prospective employers, acting on an 
application for a CDL driver position with the applicant[acute]s 
written consent to access the Clearinghouse, would query the 
Clearinghouse to determine if any specific information about the driver 
applicant is in the Clearinghouse before allowing the applicant to be 
hired and to drive CMVs. This rulemaking is intended to increase 
highway safety by ensuring CDL holders, who have tested positive or 
have refused to submit to testing, have completed the U.S. DOT[acute]s 
return-to-duty process before driving CMVs in interstate or intrastate 
commerce. It is also intended to ensure that employers are meeting 
their drug and alcohol testing responsibilities. Additionally, 
provisions in this rulemaking would also be responsive to requirements 
of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act. MAP-
21 requires creation of the Clearinghouse by 10/1/14.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   07/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Deborah Snider, Chief, Commercial Enforcement (MC-
ECC), Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-0916, Email: deborah.snider@fmcsa.dot.gov.
    RIN: 2126-AB18

53. +Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting 
Documents (MAP-21)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502; 31136(a); Pub. L. 103.311; 49 
U.S.C. 31137(a)
    Abstract: This SNPRM would establish: (1) minimum performance 
standards for electronic logging devices (ELDs); (2) requirements for 
the mandatory use of the devices by drivers required to prepare 
handwritten records of duty status (RODS); (3) requirements concerning 
HOS supporting documents; and (4) measures to ensure that the mandatory 
use of ELDs will not result in harassment of drivers by motor carriers 
and enforcement officials. This rulemaking supplements the Agency's 
February 1, 2011, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) and addresses 
issues raised by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 
Court in its 2011 decision vacating the Agency's April 5, 2010, final 
rule concerning ELDs. The requirements for ELDs would improve 
compliance with the hours-of-service (HOS) rules and thereby decrease 
the risk of fatigue-related crashes attributable to non-compliance with 
the applicable HOS requirements.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   02/01/11  76 FR 5537
NPRM Comment Period End.............   02/28/11  .......................
Comment Period Extended.............   03/10/11  76 FR 13121
Extended Comment Period End.........   05/23/11  .......................
Supplemental NPRM...................   11/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Deborah M Freund, Senior Transportation Specialist, 
Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-5370, Email: deborah.freund@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2126-AB20

54. +Inspection, Repair, and Maintenance; Driver-Vehicle Inspection 
Report (RRR)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31502(b)
    Abstract: This rulemaking would rescind the requirement that 
commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers operating in interstate commerce 
submit, and motor carriers retain, driver-vehicle inspection reports 
when the driver has neither found nor been made aware of any vehicle 
defects or deficiencies. Specifically, this rulemaking would remove a 
significant information collection burden without adversely impacting 
safety. This rulemaking responds in part to the President[acute]s 
January 2012 Regulatory Review and Reform initiative.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   09/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Sean Gallagher, MC-PRR, Department of 
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-3740, Email: 
sean.gallagher@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2126-AB46

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)

Final Rule Stage

55. +Unified Registration System

    Legal Authority: Pub. L. 104-88; 109 Stat 803, 888 (1995); 49 
U.S.C. 13908; Pub. L. 109-159, sec 4304
    Abstract: This rule would establish a new Unified Registration 
System (URS) to replace four legacy systems in support of FMCSA[acute]s 
safety and commercial oversight responsibilities. It would require all 
entities subject to FMCSA jurisdiction to comply with a new URS 
registration and biennial update requirement and, disclose the 
cumulative registration information collected by URS. It would and 
provides a cross-reference to all regulatory requirements necessary to 
obtain permanent registration. It implements statutory provisions in 
the ICC Termination Act and SAFTEA-LU. URS would serve as a 
clearinghouse and depository of information on, and identification of, 
motor carriers, brokers, freight forwarders, and others required to 
register with the Department of Transportation. The agency has 
determined the total net societal benefits of the rule to be $19.5 
million and the total societal costs to be $26.5 million.
    Timetable:

[[Page 44303]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   08/26/96  61 FR 43816
ANPRM Comment Period End............   10/25/96  .......................
NPRM................................   05/19/05  70 FR 28990
NPRM Comment Period End.............   08/17/05  .......................
Supplemental NPRM...................   10/26/11  76 FR 66506
SNPRM Comment Period End............   12/27/11  .......................
Final Rule..........................   07/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Genevieve Sapir, Management Analyst, Department of 
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of 
Policy (MC-CCR), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-7056, Email: genevieve.sapir@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2126-AA22

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)

Completed Actions

56. Self Reporting of Out-of-State Convictions (RRR) (Section 610 
Review)

    Legal Authority: Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986
    Abstract: This rulemaking would clarify the requirement for holders 
of commercial drivers licenses (CDL) convicted of violating traffic 
laws in a State other than the State that issued their CDL, to notify 
the State of issuance about those violations under part 383.31 of 
FMCSA's Commercial Drivers License Standards; and clarify the 
requirement for the licensing agency from the jurisdiction in which the 
conviction takes place to notify the State licensing Agency that issued 
the CDL under part 384.209 State Compliance with Commercial Drivers 
License Program. This rulemaking would also ensure that notifications 
required in sections 383.31 and 384.209 take place within 30 days of 
the conviction.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   08/02/12  77 FR 46010
NPRM Comment Period End.............   10/01/12  .......................
Final Rule..........................   04/26/13  78 FR 24684
Final Rule Effective................   05/28/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Agency Contact: Robert Redmond, Senior Transportation Specialist, 
Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-5014, Email: robert.redmond@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2126-AB43
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)

Proposed Rule Stage

57. +Risk Reduction Program

    Legal Authority: Pub. L. no 110-432, Div A, 122 Stat 4848 et seq.; 
Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008; sec 103, 49 U.S.C. 20156 
``Railroad Safety Risk Reduction Program''
    Abstract: This rulemaking would consider appropriate contents or 
require each Class I railroad and each railroad with inadequate safety 
performance to develop and implement a Risk Reduction Program (RRP) and 
how they should be implemented and reviewed by FRA. Program (RRP) to 
improve the safety of their operations. Each RRP would be required to 
include a risk analysis, a technology implementation plan, and a 
fatigue management plan. Railroads would be required to conduct annual 
internal assessments of their RRPs, which could also be externally 
audited by FRA.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   12/08/10  75 FR 76345
ANPRM Comment Period End............   02/07/11  .......................
NPRM................................   09/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Kathryn Shelton, Trial Attorney, Department of 
Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 
SE., Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 493-6063, Email: 
kathryn.shelton@fra.dot.gov.
    RIN: 2130-AC11

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

Proposed Rule Stage

58. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of On-Shore Liquid Hazardous Pipelines

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.
    Abstract: This rulemaking would address effective procedures that 
hazardous liquid operators can use to improve the protection of High 
Consequence Areas (HCA) and other vulnerable areas along their 
hazardous liquid onshore pipelines. PHMSA is considering whether 
changes are needed to the regulations covering hazardous liquid onshore 
pipelines, whether other areas should be included as HCAs for integrity 
management (IM) protections, what the repair timeframes should be for 
areas outside the HCAs that are assessed as part of the IM program, 
whether leak detection standards are necessary, valve spacing 
requirements are needed on new construction or existing pipelines, and 
PHMSA should extend regulation to certain pipelines currently exempt 
from regulation. The agency would also address the public safety and 
environmental aspects any new requirements, as well as the cost 
implications and regulatory burden.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM...............................   10/18/10  75 FR 63774
ANPRM Comment Period End............   01/18/11  .......................
ANPRM Comment Period Extended.......   01/04/11  76 FR 303
ANPRM Extended Comment Period End...   02/18/11  .......................
NPRM................................   10/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: John A Gale, Transportation Regulations Specialist, 
Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-0434, Email: john.gale@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2137-AE66

59. Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas 
Pipeline Industry

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.
    Abstract: This rulemaking would address a number of issues related 
to the

[[Page 44304]]

use of plastic pipe in the gas pipeline industry. These issues include 
composite pipe petitions, plastic issues on gas lines, authorized use 
of PA12 at higher pressures, 50 year markings, increasing design factor 
from 0.32 to 0.40 for polyethylene pipe, characterization of ``plastic 
pipe'' to ``non-metallic pipe,'' leak repair revisions, incorporation 
by reference certain ANSI standards and enhanced tracking and 
traceability of lines.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/00/14  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Cameron H Satterthwaite, Transportation Regulations 
Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous 
Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-8553, Email: 
cameron.satterthwaite@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2137-AE93

60. Pipeline Safety: Miscellaneous Amendments Related to 
Reauthorization and Petitions for Rulemaking (RRR)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.
    Abstract: This rulemaking will address miscellaneous issues that 
have been raised because of the reauthorization of the pipeline safety 
program in 2012 and petitions for rulemaking from many affected 
stakeholders. Some of the issues that this rulemaking would address 
include, renewal process for special permits, cost recovery for design 
reviews and incident reporting.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/00/14  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: John A Gale, Transportation Regulations Specialist, 
Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-0434, Email: john.gale@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2137-AE94

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

Final Rule Stage

61. +Hazardous Materials: Revisions to Requirements for the 
Transportation of Lithium Batteries

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
    Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Hazardous Materials 
Regulations to comprehensively address the safe transportation of 
lithium cells and batteries. The intent of the rulemaking is to 
strengthen the current regulatory framework by imposing more effective 
safeguards, including design testing to address risks related to 
internal short circuits, and enhanced packaging, hazard communication, 
and operational measures for various types and sizes of lithium 
batteries in specific transportation contexts. The rulemaking would 
respond to several recommendations issued by the National 
Transportation Safety Board.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   01/11/10  75 FR 1302
NPRM Comment Period End.............   03/12/10  .......................
Notice..............................   04/11/12  77 FR 21714
Notice Comment Period End...........   05/11/12  .......................
NPRM Comment Period Extended........   01/07/13  78 FR 1119
NPRM Comment Period Extended End....   03/08/13  .......................
Final Rule..........................   11/00/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Kevin Leary, Transportation Specialist, Department 
of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety 
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, 
Phone: 202 366-8553, Email: kevin.leary@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2137-AE44

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

Completed Actions

62. Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR) (Completion of 
a Section 610 Review)

    Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
    Abstract: This rulemaking would update and clarify existing 
requirements by incorporating changes into the Hazardous Materials 
Regulations (HMR) based on PHMSA's own initiatives through an extensive 
review of the HMR and previously issued letters of interpretation. 
Specifically, among other provisions, PHMSA would provide for the 
continued use of approvals until final administrative action is taken, 
when a correct and completed application for approval renewal was 
received 60 days prior to expiration date; update various entries in 
the hazardous materials table and the corresponding special provisions; 
clarify the lab pack requirements for temperature controlled materials; 
correct an error in the HMR with regard to the inspection of cargo tank 
motor vehicles containing corrosive materials; and revise the training 
requirements to require that hazardous materials employers ensure their 
hazardous materials employee training records are available upon 
request to an authorized official of the Department of Transportation 
or the Department of Homeland Security.
    Timetable:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                    Date            FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................   04/26/12  77 FR 24885
NPRM Comment Period End.............   06/25/12  .......................
Final Rule..........................   03/11/13  78 FR 15303
Final Rule Effective................   05/10/13  .......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No.
    Agency Contact: Robert Benedict, Transportation Regulations 
Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous 
Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-8553, Email: 
robert.benedict@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2137-AE78

BILLING CODE 4910-60-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)

Maritime Administration (MARAD)

Long-Term Actions

63. +Regulations To Be Followed by all Departments, Agencies, and 
Shippers Having Responsibility To Provide a Preference for U.S.-Flag 
Vessels in the Shipment of Cargoes on Ocean Vessels

    Legal Authority: 49 CFR 1.66; 46 app U.S.C. 1101; 46 app U.S.C. 
1241; 46 U.S.C. 2302 (e)(1); Pub. L. 91-469

[[Page 44305]]

    Abstract: This rulemaking would revise and clarify the Cargo 
Preference rules that have not been revised substantially since 1971. 
Revisions would include an updated purpose and definitions section 
along with the removal of obsolete provisions. This rulemaking also 
would establish a new Part 383 to implement the Cargo Preference 
regulations. This rulemaking would cover Public Law 110-417, section 
3511, National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009 changes to the 
cargo preference rules. The rulemaking would also provide for 
compromise, assessment, mitigation, settlement, and collection of civil 
penalties. Originally the agency had two separate rulemakings in 
process under RIN 2133-AB74 and 2133-AB75. RIN 2133-AB74 would have 
revised existing regulations and RIN 2133-AB75 would have established a 
new part 383: Guidance and Civil Penalties and implement Public Law 
110-417, section 3511, National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2009. 
MARAD has decided it would be more efficient to merge both efforts 
under one; RIN 2133-AB75 has been merged with this action.
    Timetable: Next Action Undetermined.
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
    Agency Contact: Dennis Brennan, Department of Transportation, 
Maritime Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 
20590, Phone: 202 366-1029, Email: dennis.brennan@dot.gov.
    RIN: 2133-AB74

[FR Doc. 2013-17066 Filed 7-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.