Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish, 43858-43860 [2013-17530]
Download as PDF
43858
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Notices
Issued this 16th day of July 2013.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2013–17513 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–449–804; A–455–803; A–560–811; A–
570–860; A–822–804; A–823–809; A–841–
804]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From
Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova,
Poland, the People’s Republic of
China, and Ukraine: Continuation of
Antidumping Duty Orders
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (‘‘Department’’) that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders 1 on steel concrete reinforcing
bars from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, Poland, the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘PRC’’), and Ukraine would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping, and by the International
Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is publishing this notice of
the continuation of the antidumping
duty orders.
DATES: Effective Date: July 22, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Decker, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 1, Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–0916.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 2, 2012, the Department and
the ITC initiated the second sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on steel concrete reinforcing bars from
Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova,
Poland, the PRC, and Ukraine, pursuant
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 See
Antidumping Duty Orders: Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bars From Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, People’s Republic of China, Poland,
Republic of Korea and Ukraine, 66 FR 46777
(September 7, 2001). On August 9, 2007, the
Department revoked the antidumping duty order on
steel concrete reinforcing bars from the Republic of
Korea. See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars from
South Korea: Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Order, 72 FR 44830 (August 9, 2007).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).2 In these
sunset reviews, the Department
determined that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on steel
concrete reinforcing bars from Belarus,
Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, the
PRC, and Ukraine would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margin likely to
prevail should the orders be revoked.3
On July 9, 2013, pursuant to section
752(a) of the Act, the ITC published its
determination that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on steel
concrete reinforcing bars from Belarus,
Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, the
PRC, and Ukraine would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.4
Scope of the Orders
The product covered by the orders is
all steel concrete reinforcing bars sold in
straight lengths, currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item
numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050,
7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000,
7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any
other tariff item number. Specifically
excluded are plain rounds (i.e., nondeformed or smooth bars) and rebar that
has been further processed through
bending or coating.
Although the HTSUS item numbers
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the orders
remains dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of these orders would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, pursuant
to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the
Department hereby orders the
continuation of the antidumping duty
orders on steel concrete reinforcing bars
from Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia,
Moldova, Poland, the PRC, and Ukraine.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
will continue to collect antidumping
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
77 FR 39218, 39219 (July 2, 2012).
3 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars From
Belarus, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland,
People’s Republic of China and Ukraine: Final
Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Reviews of
the Antidumping Duty Orders; 77 FR 70140
(November 23, 2012).
4 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
Belarus, China, Indonesia, Latvia, Moldova, Poland,
and Ukraine, 78 FR 41079 (July 9, 2013).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
duty cash deposits at the rates in effect
at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise. The effective date
of continuation of these orders will be
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of continuation.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
the Department intends to initiate the
next five-year review of these orders not
later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuations.
These five-year sunset reviews and
notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: July 15, 2013.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–17538 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC768
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final determination
and discussion of underlying biological
analysis.
AGENCY:
NMFS has evaluated the
Tribal Resource Management Plans
(Plans) submitted by the Confederated
Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation, the Shoshone-Bannock
Tribes, and the Nez Perce Tribe to
NMFS pursuant to the limitation on take
prohibitions for actions conducted
under the Tribal Rule of section 4(d) for
salmon and steelhead promulgated
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The Plans specify fishery
management activities in the Oregon
and Washington portions of the Snake
River basin. This document serves to
notify the public that NMFS, by
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Commerce, has determined pursuant
to the ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule for salmon
and steelhead that implementing and
enforcing the Plans will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of survival and
recovery of ESA-listed salmon and
steelhead.
SUMMARY:
The final determination on the
Plan was made on July 2, 2013.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Notices
National Marine Fisheries
Service, Salmon Management Division,
1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100,
Portland, OR 97232.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
˜
Enrique Patino at (206) 526–4655, or
email: Enrique.Patino@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha): threatened, naturally
produced and artificially propagated
Snake River spring/summer.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened,
naturally produced and artificially
propagated Snake River Basin.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT), the
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Indian Reservation (CTUIR), and the
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (SBT) each
submitted a Tribal Resource
Management Plan for harvest of Snake
River spring/summer Chinook salmon
in the Imnaha and Grande Ronde
subbasins for review under the Tribal
4(d) rule. Activities described in the
Plans include tribal fisheries for
hatchery-origin and natural-origin
Chinook salmon using populationspecific abundance-based harvest rate
schedules, which incorporate
conditions for the conservation and
restoration of salmon stocks. The
management objective is for the NPT,
the CTUIR, and the SBT to conduct
fisheries in a manner that does not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of
survival and recovery of listed Chinook
salmon. The proposed Plans provide the
framework through which Tribal salmon
fisheries can be implemented while
meeting requirements specified under
the ESA.
Under section 4(d) of the ESA, the
Secretary is required to adopt such
regulations as he deems necessary and
advisable for the conservation of species
listed as threatened. NMFS has issued a
final ESA 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans
adopting regulations necessary and
advisable to harmonize statutory
conservation requirements with tribal
rights and the Federal trust
responsibility to tribes (50 CFR
223.209).
This 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans applies
the prohibitions enumerated in section
9(a)(1) of the ESA. NMFS did not find
it necessary and advisable to apply the
take prohibitions described in section
9(a)(1)(B) and 9(a)(1)(C) to fishery
harvest activities if the fisheries are
managed in accordance with a Tribal
Plan whose implementation has been
determined by the Secretary to not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
appreciably reduce the likelihood of
survival and recovery of the listed
salmonids.
As specified in the Tribal 4(d) Rule,
before the Secretary makes a decision on
a Tribal Plan, the public must have an
opportunity to review and comment on
the pending determination. NMFS made
the proposed evaluation and pending
determinations available for public
review, and the final evaluation and
determinations reflect consideration of
comments received.
Discussion of the Biological Analysis
Underlying the Determination
The management objective is for the
tribes to conduct fisheries in a manner
that does not appreciably reduce the
likelihood of survival and recovery of
listed Chinook salmon and steelhead.
The Plans include provisions for
monitoring and evaluation to assess
fishing-related impacts on Snake River
spring/summer Chinook salmon. The
Plans utilize a harvest rate with five
tiers based on predicted adult
abundance of each of the affected
populations. The majority of the harvest
is anticipated to come from hatcheryorigin stocks. The Plans also describe a
process to guide coordination of fishery
design and implementation between the
agencies implementing fisheries in the
action area. The Plans include
provisions for monitoring and
evaluation to assess fishing-related
impacts on Snake River spring/summer
Chinook salmon. Performance
indicators include dam, weir, and redd
counts, harvest estimates, and
escapement with respect to escapement
goals.
The tribes intend to engage in
ceremonial and subsistence harvest of
both hatchery and natural-origin spring/
summer Chinook salmon. Annually, the
tribes would issue season regulations
detailing the timing and season
regulations for tributary fisheries
consistent with these long-term Plans.
Under the Plans, the tribes would
manage all Chinook salmon fisheries to
achieve escapement objectives using
population-specific, abundance-based
harvest rate schedules to limit ESA take
according to year-specific adult
escapement abundances. As a result,
weaker populations will sustain less
harvest and, as the number of predicted
adults increase, the number of fish
escaping to the spawning grounds will
also increase.
To achieve their conservation
objectives, the Plans employ a number
of key strategies as part of their harvest
conservation measures, including: (1)
Fishery-related redistribution of the
conservation burden historically borne
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43859
by fisheries; (2) use of threshold points
to restrict the take of ESA-listed fish;
and (3) application of a sliding scale
approach to determine appropriate ESA
take limits on critically low runs as well
as on healthier runs at levels that may
not slow recovery.
The Plans include provisions for
annual reports that will assess
compliance with performance standards
established through the Plans. The
monitoring and evaluation described in
the Plans will focus on two primary
performance indicators: adult and
juvenile abundance, and the overall
assessment of abundance and
productivity measures for each
population. Reporting and inclusion of
new information derived from research,
monitoring, and evaluation activities
provides assurance that performance
standards will be achieved in future
seasons.
Summary of Comments Received in
Response to the Proposed Evaluation
and Pending Determination
NMFS published notice of its
proposed evaluation and pending
determination on two of the Plans for
public review and comment on August
11, 2011 (76 FR 49735). The proposed
evaluation and pending determination
and an associated draft environmental
assessment were available for public
review and comment for 30 days. NMFS
received comments from the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife, the
CTUIR, and the NPT. Subsequently,
NMFS received an updated TRMP from
the NPT, addressing management of
NPT fisheries in the Grande Ronde and
Imnaha Rivers. NMFS published notice
of its proposed evaluation and pending
determination on the NPT Plan for
public review and comment on January
23, 2013 (78 FR 4835), also for 30 days.
No comments were received.
A detailed summary of the comments
and NMFS’ responses is also available
on the Salmon Management Division
Web site. Based on its evaluation and
recommended determinations and
taking into account the public
comments, NMFS issued its final
determination on the three tribal fishery
Plans.
Authority
Under section 4 of the ESA, the
Secretary is required to adopt such
regulations as he deems necessary and
advisable for the conservation of the
species listed as threatened. The ESA
Tribal 4(d) Rule (50 CFR 223.209) states
that the ESA section 9 take prohibitions
will not apply to Tribal Plans that will
not appreciably reduce the likelihood of
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
43860
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Notices
survival and recovery for the listed
species.
Dated: July 17, 2013.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–17530 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC731
Caribbean Fishery Management
Council; Scoping Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of scoping meetings.
AGENCY:
The Caribbean Fishery
Management Council will hold scoping
meetings to obtain input from fishers,
the general public, and the local
agencies representatives on the
development of island-specific fishery
management plans for Puerto Rico, St.
Thomas/St. John, USVI and St. Croix,
USVI. A fishery management plan will
be developed for each of these areas.
The document entitled ‘‘Development
of a Comprehensive Fishery
Management Plan for the Exclusive
Economic Zone of St. Thomas/St. John,
USVI,’’ will consider the following
alternative actions:
Action 1: Establish the fishery
management units (FMUs) for the
comprehensive St. Thomas/St/John
fishery management plan (FMP).
Action 2: Revise the species
composition of the comprehensive St.
Thomas/St. John FMP.
Action 3: Establish management
reference points for any new species
added to the comprehensive St.
Thomas/St. John FMP.
Action 4: Modify or establish
additional management measures.
The document entitled ‘‘Development
of a Comprehensive Fishery
Management Plan for the Exclusive
Economic Zone of St. Croix, USVI,’’ will
consider the following alternative
actions:
Action 1: Establish the fishery
management units (FMUs) for the
comprehensive St. Croix, USVI fishery
management plan (FMP).
Action 2: Revise the species
composition of the comprehensive St.
Croix FMP.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
Action 3: Establish management
reference points for any new species
added to the comprehensive St. Croix,
USVI FMP.
Action 4: Modify or establish
additional management measures.
The document entitled ‘‘Development
of a Comprehensive Fishery
Management Plan for the Exclusive
Economic Zone of Puerto Rico,’’ will
consider the following alternative
actions:
Action 1: Establish the fishery
management units (FMUs) for the
comprehensive Puerto Rico fishery
management plan (FMP).
Action 2: Revise the species
composition of the comprehensive
Puerto Rico FMP.
Action 3: Establish management
reference points for any new species
added to the comprehensive Puerto Rico
FMP.
Action 4: Modify or establish
additional management measures.
The comprehensive plans will
incorporate and modify, as needed,
federal fishery management measures
included in each of the existing species
based management plans (Spiny
Lobster, Reef Fish, Coral and Queen
Conch). The goal is to create
management plans tailored to the
specific fishery management needs of
each area. If approved, these new
management plans being developed for
each area; St. Thomas/St. John, USVI;
St. Croix, USVI, and Puerto Rico, will
replace the current species-based plans
presently governing commercial and
recreational harvest in the U.S.
Caribbean federal waters.
Dates and Addresses: Due to the
tropical storm Chantel the scoping
meetings in these locations could not be
held. The rescheduled scoping meetings
will be held on the following dates and
locations:
In Puerto Rico:
August 5, 2013—7 p.m.–10 p.m.—
Mayaguez Resort & Casino, Route 104,
¨
Km 0.3, Mayaguez 00680, Puerto Rico.
August 6, 2013—7 p.m.–10 p.m.—at
the Holiday Inn Ponce & Tropical
Casino, 3315 Ponce By Pass, Ponce,
Puerto Rico.
In the U.S. Virgin Islands:
August 6, 2013—7 p.m.—10 p.m.—
Windward Passage Hotel, Charlotte
Amalie, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caribbean Fishery Management Council,
˜
270 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 401,
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918–1903,
telephone: (787) 766–5926.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Caribbean Fishery Management Council
will hold scoping meetings to receive
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
public input on the management
options mentioned above. The complete
document is available at:
www.caribbeanfmc.com or you may
contact Ms. Livia Montalvo at
livia_montalvo_cfmc@yahoo.com, or the
Council office at (787) 766–5926 to
obtain copies.
Written comments can be sent to the
Council not later than July 31, 2013, by
regular mail to the address below, or via
email to graciela_cfmc@yahoo.com.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
For more information or request for sign
language interpretation and other
auxiliary aids, please contact Mr.
´
Miguel A. Rolon, Executive Director,
Caribbean Fishery Management Council,
˜
270 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 401,
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00918–1903,
telephone: (787) 766–5926, at least 5
days prior to the meeting date.
Dated: June 17, 2013.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–17511 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC770
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.
AGENCY:
The Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Pacific Council)
will convene a conference call of its
Groundfish Essential Fish Habitat
Review Committee (EFHRC). A listening
station will be available at the Pacific
Council offices for interested members
of the public, and there may be
opportunities to attend the meeting
remotely.
SUMMARY:
The conference call will be held
Friday, August 16, 2013, from 10 a.m. to
12 noon.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held
via conference call, with a public
listening station available at the Pacific
Council offices, 7700 NE Ambassador
Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\22JYN1.SGM
22JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 140 (Monday, July 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43858-43860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17530]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC768
Endangered and Threatened Species; Take of Anadromous Fish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of final determination and discussion of underlying
biological analysis.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS has evaluated the Tribal Resource Management Plans
(Plans) submitted by the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian
Reservation, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, and the Nez Perce Tribe to
NMFS pursuant to the limitation on take prohibitions for actions
conducted under the Tribal Rule of section 4(d) for salmon and
steelhead promulgated under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Plans
specify fishery management activities in the Oregon and Washington
portions of the Snake River basin. This document serves to notify the
public that NMFS, by delegated authority from the Secretary of
Commerce, has determined pursuant to the ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule for
salmon and steelhead that implementing and enforcing the Plans will not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of ESA-
listed salmon and steelhead.
DATES: The final determination on the Plan was made on July 2, 2013.
[[Page 43859]]
ADDRESSES: National Marine Fisheries Service, Salmon Management
Division, 1201 NE. Lloyd Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Enrique Pati[ntilde]o at (206) 526-
4655, or email: Enrique.Patino@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): threatened, naturally
produced and artificially propagated Snake River spring/summer.
Steelhead (O. mykiss): threatened, naturally produced and
artificially propagated Snake River Basin.
Background
The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT), the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla
Indian Reservation (CTUIR), and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (SBT) each
submitted a Tribal Resource Management Plan for harvest of Snake River
spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Imnaha and Grande Ronde subbasins
for review under the Tribal 4(d) rule. Activities described in the
Plans include tribal fisheries for hatchery-origin and natural-origin
Chinook salmon using population-specific abundance-based harvest rate
schedules, which incorporate conditions for the conservation and
restoration of salmon stocks. The management objective is for the NPT,
the CTUIR, and the SBT to conduct fisheries in a manner that does not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of listed
Chinook salmon. The proposed Plans provide the framework through which
Tribal salmon fisheries can be implemented while meeting requirements
specified under the ESA.
Under section 4(d) of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt
such regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the
conservation of species listed as threatened. NMFS has issued a final
ESA 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans adopting regulations necessary and
advisable to harmonize statutory conservation requirements with tribal
rights and the Federal trust responsibility to tribes (50 CFR 223.209).
This 4(d) Rule for Tribal Plans applies the prohibitions enumerated
in section 9(a)(1) of the ESA. NMFS did not find it necessary and
advisable to apply the take prohibitions described in section
9(a)(1)(B) and 9(a)(1)(C) to fishery harvest activities if the
fisheries are managed in accordance with a Tribal Plan whose
implementation has been determined by the Secretary to not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of survival and recovery of the listed salmonids.
As specified in the Tribal 4(d) Rule, before the Secretary makes a
decision on a Tribal Plan, the public must have an opportunity to
review and comment on the pending determination. NMFS made the proposed
evaluation and pending determinations available for public review, and
the final evaluation and determinations reflect consideration of
comments received.
Discussion of the Biological Analysis Underlying the Determination
The management objective is for the tribes to conduct fisheries in
a manner that does not appreciably reduce the likelihood of survival
and recovery of listed Chinook salmon and steelhead. The Plans include
provisions for monitoring and evaluation to assess fishing-related
impacts on Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon. The Plans utilize
a harvest rate with five tiers based on predicted adult abundance of
each of the affected populations. The majority of the harvest is
anticipated to come from hatchery-origin stocks. The Plans also
describe a process to guide coordination of fishery design and
implementation between the agencies implementing fisheries in the
action area. The Plans include provisions for monitoring and evaluation
to assess fishing-related impacts on Snake River spring/summer Chinook
salmon. Performance indicators include dam, weir, and redd counts,
harvest estimates, and escapement with respect to escapement goals.
The tribes intend to engage in ceremonial and subsistence harvest
of both hatchery and natural-origin spring/summer Chinook salmon.
Annually, the tribes would issue season regulations detailing the
timing and season regulations for tributary fisheries consistent with
these long-term Plans. Under the Plans, the tribes would manage all
Chinook salmon fisheries to achieve escapement objectives using
population-specific, abundance-based harvest rate schedules to limit
ESA take according to year-specific adult escapement abundances. As a
result, weaker populations will sustain less harvest and, as the number
of predicted adults increase, the number of fish escaping to the
spawning grounds will also increase.
To achieve their conservation objectives, the Plans employ a number
of key strategies as part of their harvest conservation measures,
including: (1) Fishery-related redistribution of the conservation
burden historically borne by fisheries; (2) use of threshold points to
restrict the take of ESA-listed fish; and (3) application of a sliding
scale approach to determine appropriate ESA take limits on critically
low runs as well as on healthier runs at levels that may not slow
recovery.
The Plans include provisions for annual reports that will assess
compliance with performance standards established through the Plans.
The monitoring and evaluation described in the Plans will focus on two
primary performance indicators: adult and juvenile abundance, and the
overall assessment of abundance and productivity measures for each
population. Reporting and inclusion of new information derived from
research, monitoring, and evaluation activities provides assurance that
performance standards will be achieved in future seasons.
Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Proposed Evaluation and
Pending Determination
NMFS published notice of its proposed evaluation and pending
determination on two of the Plans for public review and comment on
August 11, 2011 (76 FR 49735). The proposed evaluation and pending
determination and an associated draft environmental assessment were
available for public review and comment for 30 days. NMFS received
comments from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, the CTUIR,
and the NPT. Subsequently, NMFS received an updated TRMP from the NPT,
addressing management of NPT fisheries in the Grande Ronde and Imnaha
Rivers. NMFS published notice of its proposed evaluation and pending
determination on the NPT Plan for public review and comment on January
23, 2013 (78 FR 4835), also for 30 days. No comments were received.
A detailed summary of the comments and NMFS' responses is also
available on the Salmon Management Division Web site. Based on its
evaluation and recommended determinations and taking into account the
public comments, NMFS issued its final determination on the three
tribal fishery Plans.
Authority
Under section 4 of the ESA, the Secretary is required to adopt such
regulations as he deems necessary and advisable for the conservation of
the species listed as threatened. The ESA Tribal 4(d) Rule (50 CFR
223.209) states that the ESA section 9 take prohibitions will not apply
to Tribal Plans that will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of
[[Page 43860]]
survival and recovery for the listed species.
Dated: July 17, 2013.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-17530 Filed 7-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P