Irish Potatoes Grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California, and in All Counties in Oregon, Except Malheur County; Termination of Marketing Order No. 947, 43827-43829 [2013-17464]
Download as PDF
43827
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 140
Monday, July 22, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 947
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–13–0036; FV13–947–1
PR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Modoc and
Siskiyou Counties, California, and in
All Counties in Oregon, Except
Malheur County; Termination of
Marketing Order No. 947
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule invites
comments on the termination of
Marketing Order No. 947 (order), which
regulates the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties,
California, and in all counties in
Oregon, except Malheur County, and the
rules and regulations issued thereunder.
The order is administered locally by the
Oregon-California Potato Committee
(Committee), which recommended
termination of the marketing order at a
meeting held on March 7, 2013. This
recommendation is based on the
Committee’s determination that the
order is no longer an effective marketing
tool for the Oregon-California potato
industry, and that termination would
best serve the current needs of the
industry while also eliminating the
costs associated with operating the
marketing order.
DATES: Comments must be received by
September 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments should reference the
document number and the date and
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Bright, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 205–2830, Fax: (202)
720–8938 or Email:
Kathleen.Bright@ams.usda.gov or
Michelle Sharrow, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–9921, Fax: (202)
720–8938 or Email:
Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposal is governed by § 608c(16)(A) of
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act’’, and § 947.71 of Marketing
Agreement No. 114 and Marketing
Order No. 947, both as amended (7 CFR
part 947), effective under the Act and
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘order’’.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This proposal to terminate the order
has been reviewed under Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This
proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on
the termination of the order and the
rules and regulations issued thereunder.
The order authorizes regulation of the
handling of Oregon-California potatoes.
At a meeting held in Salem, Oregon, on
March 7, 2013, the Committee
recommended termination of the order.
Section 947.71 of the order provides,
in pertinent part, that USDA terminate
or suspend any or all provisions of the
order when a finding is made that the
order does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. In addition,
section 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides
that USDA terminate or suspend the
operation of any order whenever the
order or any provision thereof obstructs
or does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. Additionally,
USDA is required to notify Congress not
later than 60 days before the date the
order would be terminated.
The order has been in effect since
1942 and provides the OregonCalifornia potato industry with
authority to establish grade, size,
maturity, quality, pack and inspection
requirements. The order also authorizes
marketing research and development
projects, the collection of assessments,
and reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Based on the Committee’s
recommendation, USDA suspended the
order’s handling, reporting, and
assessment collection regulations
effective July 1, 1999 (64 FR 49352). The
suspended handling regulations
(§ 947.340) consist of minimum quality
requirements for potatoes produced
within the regulated production area.
When the Committee made the
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
43828
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
recommendation to suspend the
handling regulations, the industry
believed that the costs of inspections
outweighed the benefits of having the
regulatory requirements in effect. At
that time, the Committee also
suspended the collection of assessments
because there were sufficient funds in
the monetary reserve to support the
Committee’s administrative functions.
Suspension of §§ 947.247 and 947.180
suspended the collection of assessments
and the reporting provision that
provided a basis for assessment
collection. The Committee also decided
to evaluate its finances and the
marketing conditions annually
thereafter to determine whether to
continue with the suspension or take
some other action.
After almost 14 years of evaluating the
effects of operating without the
handling, reporting, and collection of
assessment regulations, the Committee
has determined that suspension of the
regulations has not adversely impacted
the Oregon-California potato industry.
Analysis of the marketing conditions
over the past 14 years, and analysis of
statistics showing that the OregonCalifornia potato industry has steadily
declined over the past several years, led
the Committee to conclude that the
order is no longer an effective marketing
tool. Termination would relieve the
industry of the costs and burdens
associated with the order.
Evidence reflecting the industry’s
steady decline include statistics
showing that the Oregon-California
potato industry has fewer producers and
handlers today than there were 30 years
ago, and that acreage and production
have significantly decreased. For
example, USDA Marketing Order and
Agreement Division records from a
continuance referendum in 1978
indicate that there were approximately
464 producers of potatoes in the order’s
production area, while the most recent
information received from the
Committee indicates that there are now
only 130 active producers. Furthermore,
Committee records indicate that there
were 47 handlers in 1978. Currently,
there are only 16 handlers operating.
Committee records also indicate that
6,810,195 hundredweight of OregonCalifornia potatoes were shipped in
1978 as compared to the 3,430,548
hundredweight shipped in 2011.
The proposed termination of the order
is intended to solicit input and any
additional information available from
interested parties regarding whether the
order should be terminated. USDA will
evaluate all available information prior
to making a final determination on this
matter. Termination of the order would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
become effective only after a 60-day
notification to Congress as required by
law.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are 16 handlers of potatoes
subject to regulation under the order
and approximately 130 potato producers
in the regulated production area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those having annual receipts of
less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. (13 CFR 121.201)
During the 2011 marketing year, the
Committee reports that 3,430,548
hundredweight of Oregon-California
potatoes were shipped into the fresh
market. Based on information from the
National Agricultural Statistics Service,
the average producer prices for Oregon
and California potatoes in 2011 were
$8.05 and $14.70 per hundredweight,
respectively. Multiplying the 2011
shipment quantity times each of the two
state average producer prices, the
average gross annual revenue for the 130
Oregon-California potato producers is
calculated to range between $212,430
and $387,916.
Typical f.o.b. shipper prices were
estimated to be about $2.00 higher than
the average grower price per
hundredweight. The Committee
estimated handler annual receipts from
the sale of potatoes by multiplying the
estimated shipper prices by individual
handler shipment quantities. Based on
those computations, the Committee
estimated that 15 out of the 16 handlers,
or approximately 94 percent, had
annual receipts of less than $7,000,000.
In view of the foregoing, the majority of
Oregon-California potato producers and
handlers may be classified as small
entities.
This proposed rule would terminate
the Federal marketing order for Oregon-
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
California potatoes and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder. The
order authorizes regulation of the
handling of Oregon-California potatoes.
The Committee has determined that the
order is no longer an effective marketing
tool for the Oregon-California potato
industry. Evidence shows that
suspension of the handling regulations
has not adversely impacted the
shipment of potatoes and that the costs
associated with the order outweigh the
benefits. The Committee also believes
that the decline in the number of
handlers and producers, and the acreage
and volume of Oregon-California
potatoes supports termination of the
order. As a consequence, in a vote at a
meeting on March 7, 2013, the
Committee recommended that USDA
terminate the order.
Section 947.71 of the order provides
that USDA terminate or suspend any or
all provisions of the order when a
finding is made that the order does not
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act. Furthermore, § 608c(16)(A) of
the Act provides that USDA shall
terminate or suspend the operation of
any order whenever the order or
provision thereof obstructs or does not
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act. An additional provision
requires that Congress be notified not
later than 60 days before the date the
order would be terminated.
The proposed termination of the order
is a regulatory relaxation and would
reduce the costs to both handlers and
producers (while marketing order
requirements are applied to handlers,
the costs of such requirements are often
passed on to producers). Furthermore,
following a period of approximately 14
years of regulatory suspension, the
Committee has determined that
termination of the order would not
adversely impact the Oregon-California
potato industry.
The Committee considered
alternatives to this rule, including
continuing with the suspension of the
handling regulations, which would
require no regulatory action at this time;
however, this would require the
Committee to continue collecting
assessments and enforcing the reporting
requirements. The Committee also
considered requesting a producer
continuance referendum. The
Committee did not support either
option, and instead recommended that
the order be terminated.
This proposed rule is intended to
solicit input and other available
information from interested parties on
whether the order should be terminated.
USDA will evaluate all available
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Proposed Rules
information prior to making a final
determination on this matter.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection
requirements being terminated were
approved previously by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Generic
Vegetable and Specialty Crops.
Termination of the reporting
requirements under the marketing order
would reduce the reporting and
recordkeeping burden on California and
Oregon potato handlers by 316.42 hours,
and should further reduce industry
expenses.
Since handlers would no longer be
required to file forms with the
Committee, this proposed rule would
not impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large entities.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the OregonCalifornia potato industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
the Committee’s deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the March 7, 2013,
meeting was a public meeting, and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Additionally, interested persons are
invited to submit information on the
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This proposal invites comments on
the termination of Marketing Order No.
947, which regulates the handling of
Irish potatoes grown in Modoc and
Siskiyou Counties, California, and in all
counties in Oregon, except Malheur
County. All written comments received
in a timely manner will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:53 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant
to § 608c(16)(A) of the Act and § 947.71
of the order, USDA is considering
termination of the order. If USDA
decides to terminate the order, trustees
would be appointed to conclude and
liquidate the affairs of the Committee,
and would continue in that capacity
until discharged by USDA. In addition,
USDA would notify Congress 60 days in
advance of termination pursuant to
§ 608c(16)(A) of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 947
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 947—[REMOVED]
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601–674, 7 CFR part 947 is
proposed to be removed.
■
Dated: July 16, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–17464 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Parts 208 and 225
[Regulations H, Q, and Y; Docket No. R–
1459]
RIN 7100 AD–98
Risk-Based Capital Guidelines; Market
Risk
Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPR).
AGENCY:
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board)
proposes to revise its market risk capital
rule (market risk rule) to address recent
changes to the Country Risk
Classifications (CRCs) published by the
Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD), which are
referenced in the Board’s market risk
rule; to clarify the treatment of certain
traded securitization positions; to make
a technical amendment to the definition
of covered position; and to clarify the
timing of the required market risk
disclosures. These changes would
conform the Board’s current market risk
rule to the requirements in the Board’s
new capital framework and thereby
allow the current market risk rule to
serve as a bridge until the new capital
framework becomes fully effective for
all banking organizations.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43829
Comments must be submitted on
or before September 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
directed to:
When submitting comments, please
consider submitting your comments by
email or fax because paper mail in the
Washington, DC area and at the Board
may be subject to delay. You may
submit comments, identified by Docket
No. R–1459 and RIN No. 7100 AD–98,
by any of the following methods:
• Agency Web site: https://
www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email:
regs.comments@federalreserve.gov.
Include the Docket and RIN numbers in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–
3102.
• Mail: Robert deV. Frierson,
Secretary, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20551.
All public comments are available
from the Board’s Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/
foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,
unless modified for technical reasons.
Accordingly, your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information. Public comments
may also be viewed electronically or in
paper form in Room MP–500 of the
Board’s Martin Building (20th and C
Street NW., Washington, DC 20551)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Constance Horsley, Manager, (202) 452–
5239, or Tim Geishecker, Senior
Supervisory Financial Analyst, (202)
475–6353, Capital and Regulatory
Policy, Division of Banking Supervision
and Regulation; or Benjamin
McDonough, Senior Counsel, (202) 452–
2036, or Mark Buresh, Attorney (202)
452–5270, Legal Division, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets NW.,
Washington, DC 20551. For the hearing
impaired only, Telecommunication
Device for the Deaf (TDD), (202) 263–
4869.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On August 30, 2012, the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Board), and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
E:\FR\FM\22JYP1.SGM
22JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 140 (Monday, July 22, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43827-43829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17464]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 43827]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 947
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-13-0036; FV13-947-1 PR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California,
and in All Counties in Oregon, Except Malheur County; Termination of
Marketing Order No. 947
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on the termination of
Marketing Order No. 947 (order), which regulates the handling of Irish
potatoes grown in Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California, and in all
counties in Oregon, except Malheur County, and the rules and
regulations issued thereunder. The order is administered locally by the
Oregon-California Potato Committee (Committee), which recommended
termination of the marketing order at a meeting held on March 7, 2013.
This recommendation is based on the Committee's determination that the
order is no longer an effective marketing tool for the Oregon-
California potato industry, and that termination would best serve the
current needs of the industry while also eliminating the costs
associated with operating the marketing order.
DATES: Comments must be received by September 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this
proposal will be included in the record and will be made available to
the public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting comments will be made public on the Internet at the
address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Bright, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 205-2830, Fax: (202) 720-8938 or Email:
Kathleen.Bright@ams.usda.gov or Michelle Sharrow, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-9921, Fax: (202) 720-8938 or Email:
Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal is governed by Sec.
608c(16)(A) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act'', and
Sec. 947.71 of Marketing Agreement No. 114 and Marketing Order No.
947, both as amended (7 CFR part 947), effective under the Act and
hereinafter referred to as the ``order''.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This proposal to terminate the order has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not
intended to have retroactive effect. '
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposal invites comments on the termination of the order and
the rules and regulations issued thereunder. The order authorizes
regulation of the handling of Oregon-California potatoes. At a meeting
held in Salem, Oregon, on March 7, 2013, the Committee recommended
termination of the order.
Section 947.71 of the order provides, in pertinent part, that USDA
terminate or suspend any or all provisions of the order when a finding
is made that the order does not tend to effectuate the declared policy
of the Act. In addition, section 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that
USDA terminate or suspend the operation of any order whenever the order
or any provision thereof obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act. Additionally, USDA is required to notify
Congress not later than 60 days before the date the order would be
terminated.
The order has been in effect since 1942 and provides the Oregon-
California potato industry with authority to establish grade, size,
maturity, quality, pack and inspection requirements. The order also
authorizes marketing research and development projects, the collection
of assessments, and reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Based on the Committee's recommendation, USDA suspended the order's
handling, reporting, and assessment collection regulations effective
July 1, 1999 (64 FR 49352). The suspended handling regulations (Sec.
947.340) consist of minimum quality requirements for potatoes produced
within the regulated production area. When the Committee made the
[[Page 43828]]
recommendation to suspend the handling regulations, the industry
believed that the costs of inspections outweighed the benefits of
having the regulatory requirements in effect. At that time, the
Committee also suspended the collection of assessments because there
were sufficient funds in the monetary reserve to support the
Committee's administrative functions. Suspension of Sec. Sec. 947.247
and 947.180 suspended the collection of assessments and the reporting
provision that provided a basis for assessment collection. The
Committee also decided to evaluate its finances and the marketing
conditions annually thereafter to determine whether to continue with
the suspension or take some other action.
After almost 14 years of evaluating the effects of operating
without the handling, reporting, and collection of assessment
regulations, the Committee has determined that suspension of the
regulations has not adversely impacted the Oregon-California potato
industry. Analysis of the marketing conditions over the past 14 years,
and analysis of statistics showing that the Oregon-California potato
industry has steadily declined over the past several years, led the
Committee to conclude that the order is no longer an effective
marketing tool. Termination would relieve the industry of the costs and
burdens associated with the order.
Evidence reflecting the industry's steady decline include
statistics showing that the Oregon-California potato industry has fewer
producers and handlers today than there were 30 years ago, and that
acreage and production have significantly decreased. For example, USDA
Marketing Order and Agreement Division records from a continuance
referendum in 1978 indicate that there were approximately 464 producers
of potatoes in the order's production area, while the most recent
information received from the Committee indicates that there are now
only 130 active producers. Furthermore, Committee records indicate that
there were 47 handlers in 1978. Currently, there are only 16 handlers
operating. Committee records also indicate that 6,810,195 hundredweight
of Oregon-California potatoes were shipped in 1978 as compared to the
3,430,548 hundredweight shipped in 2011.
The proposed termination of the order is intended to solicit input
and any additional information available from interested parties
regarding whether the order should be terminated. USDA will evaluate
all available information prior to making a final determination on this
matter. Termination of the order would become effective only after a
60-day notification to Congress as required by law.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this rule on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are 16 handlers of potatoes subject to regulation under the
order and approximately 130 potato producers in the regulated
production area. Small agricultural service firms are defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of
less than $7,000,000, and small agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than $750,000. (13 CFR 121.201)
During the 2011 marketing year, the Committee reports that
3,430,548 hundredweight of Oregon-California potatoes were shipped into
the fresh market. Based on information from the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, the average producer prices for Oregon and
California potatoes in 2011 were $8.05 and $14.70 per hundredweight,
respectively. Multiplying the 2011 shipment quantity times each of the
two state average producer prices, the average gross annual revenue for
the 130 Oregon-California potato producers is calculated to range
between $212,430 and $387,916.
Typical f.o.b. shipper prices were estimated to be about $2.00
higher than the average grower price per hundredweight. The Committee
estimated handler annual receipts from the sale of potatoes by
multiplying the estimated shipper prices by individual handler shipment
quantities. Based on those computations, the Committee estimated that
15 out of the 16 handlers, or approximately 94 percent, had annual
receipts of less than $7,000,000. In view of the foregoing, the
majority of Oregon-California potato producers and handlers may be
classified as small entities.
This proposed rule would terminate the Federal marketing order for
Oregon-California potatoes and the rules and regulations issued
thereunder. The order authorizes regulation of the handling of Oregon-
California potatoes. The Committee has determined that the order is no
longer an effective marketing tool for the Oregon-California potato
industry. Evidence shows that suspension of the handling regulations
has not adversely impacted the shipment of potatoes and that the costs
associated with the order outweigh the benefits. The Committee also
believes that the decline in the number of handlers and producers, and
the acreage and volume of Oregon-California potatoes supports
termination of the order. As a consequence, in a vote at a meeting on
March 7, 2013, the Committee recommended that USDA terminate the order.
Section 947.71 of the order provides that USDA terminate or suspend
any or all provisions of the order when a finding is made that the
order does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Furthermore, Sec. 608c(16)(A) of the Act provides that USDA shall
terminate or suspend the operation of any order whenever the order or
provision thereof obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act. An additional provision requires that Congress be
notified not later than 60 days before the date the order would be
terminated.
The proposed termination of the order is a regulatory relaxation
and would reduce the costs to both handlers and producers (while
marketing order requirements are applied to handlers, the costs of such
requirements are often passed on to producers). Furthermore, following
a period of approximately 14 years of regulatory suspension, the
Committee has determined that termination of the order would not
adversely impact the Oregon-California potato industry.
The Committee considered alternatives to this rule, including
continuing with the suspension of the handling regulations, which would
require no regulatory action at this time; however, this would require
the Committee to continue collecting assessments and enforcing the
reporting requirements. The Committee also considered requesting a
producer continuance referendum. The Committee did not support either
option, and instead recommended that the order be terminated.
This proposed rule is intended to solicit input and other available
information from interested parties on whether the order should be
terminated. USDA will evaluate all available
[[Page 43829]]
information prior to making a final determination on this matter.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the information collection requirements being terminated
were approved previously by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
and assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Generic Vegetable and Specialty Crops.
Termination of the reporting requirements under the marketing order
would reduce the reporting and recordkeeping burden on California and
Oregon potato handlers by 316.42 hours, and should further reduce
industry expenses.
Since handlers would no longer be required to file forms with the
Committee, this proposed rule would not impose any additional reporting
or recordkeeping requirements on either small or large entities.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Oregon-California potato industry, and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in the Committee's
deliberations. Like all Committee meetings, the March 7, 2013, meeting
was a public meeting, and all entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue. Additionally, interested persons
are invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational
impacts of this action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This proposal invites comments on the termination of Marketing
Order No. 947, which regulates the handling of Irish potatoes grown in
Modoc and Siskiyou Counties, California, and in all counties in Oregon,
except Malheur County. All written comments received in a timely manner
will be considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
Based on the foregoing, and pursuant to Sec. 608c(16)(A) of the
Act and Sec. 947.71 of the order, USDA is considering termination of
the order. If USDA decides to terminate the order, trustees would be
appointed to conclude and liquidate the affairs of the Committee, and
would continue in that capacity until discharged by USDA. In addition,
USDA would notify Congress 60 days in advance of termination pursuant
to Sec. 608c(16)(A) of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 947
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 947--[REMOVED]
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, under the authority of 7
U.S.C. 601-674, 7 CFR part 947 is proposed to be removed.
Dated: July 16, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-17464 Filed 7-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P