Kiwifruit Grown in California and Imported Kiwifruit; Relaxation of Minimum Grade Requirement, 43758-43761 [2013-17462]
Download as PDF
43758
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
Larry Mitchell,
Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–17452 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 920 and 944
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–13–0032; FV13–920–1
IR]
Kiwifruit Grown in California and
Imported Kiwifruit; Relaxation of
Minimum Grade Requirement
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule relaxes the
minimum grade requirement under the
marketing order for kiwifruit grown in
California (order), and for kiwifruit
imported into the United States that are
shipped to the fresh market, by
increasing the tolerance of kiwifruit
which is ‘‘badly misshapen’’ from 7
percent to 16 percent. The order is
administered locally by the Kiwifruit
Administrative Committee (Committee).
This change is intended to facilitate the
packing of fruit to meet the minimum
grade requirement of ‘‘KAC No. 1’’, and
reduce costs associated with re-sorting
and repacking this grade of fruit. The
change in the import regulation is
required under section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937.
DATES: July 25, 2013; comments
received by September 20, 2013 will be
considered prior to issuance of a final
rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this
issue of the Federal Register and will be
made available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during
regular business hours, or can be viewed
at: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing Specialist,
or Martin Engeler, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
920, as amended (7 CFR part 920),
regulating the handling of kiwifruit in
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
This rule is also issued under section
8e of the Act, which provides that
whenever certain specified
commodities, including kiwifruit, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of these commodities
into the United States are prohibited
unless they meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, or
maturity requirements as those in effect
for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative
procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of import regulations issued
under section 8e of the Act.
Under the terms of the marketing
order, fresh market shipments of
California kiwifruit are required to be
inspected and are subject to grade, size,
maturity, pack, and container
requirements. Current requirements
include specifications that such
shipments be at least Size 45, grade at
least KAC No. 1 quality, and contain a
minimum of 6.2 percent soluble solids.
This rule relaxes the minimum grade
requirement under the definition for
KAC No. 1 kiwifruit quality by
increasing the tolerance for ‘‘badly
misshapen’’ fruit from 7 percent to 16
percent. The Committee unanimously
recommended these changes at a
meeting on March 27, 2013.
Section 920.52 of the order provides,
in part, the authority to regulate the
handling of kiwifruit and specifically, in
paragraph (a)(1), the Secretary may
limit, during any period or periods, the
shipment of any particular grade, size,
quality, maturity, or pack, or any
combination thereof, of any variety or
varieties of kiwifruit grown in the
production area.
Section 920.302 establishes
regulations regarding grade, size, pack,
and container regulations. Paragraph (a)
(1) specifies that the minimum grade be
at least KAC No.1 quality and paragraph
(b) defines that the term KAC No. 1
quality means kiwifruit that meets the
requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade as
defined in the United States Standards
for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335
through 51.2340) except that the
kiwifruit shall be ‘‘not badly
misshapen,’’ and a tolerance of 7
percent is provided for kiwifruit that is
‘‘badly misshapen,’’ and except that all
varieties of kiwifruit are exempt from
the ‘‘tightly packed’’ standard as defined
in § 51.2338(a) of the U.S. Standards for
Grades of Kiwifruit. The terms fairly
uniform in size and diameter mean the
same as defined in the U.S. Standards
for Grades of Kiwifruit.
At its meeting, the Committee
recommended revising paragraph (b) of
920.302 to increase the tolerance for
‘‘badly misshapen’’ fruit from 7 percent
to 16 percent. ‘‘Badly misshapen fruit’’
is defined in the United States
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Standards for Kiwifruit as fruit that is so
decidedly deformed that its appearance
is seriously affected.
Most kiwifruit naturally grow in an
‘‘egg’’ shape. A small percentage of fruit
develop into a flat, wide, almost square
shape. Such fruit, if it is wider than it
is tall, is considered to be badly
misshapen. Identification of badly
misshapen fruit is performed visually
during the packing process, and this
fruit is manually sorted out by
packinghouse employees. The flat/wide
fruit is separated from the cylindrical
fruit and packed into different boxes so
that there is a uniformity of shape
within the containers.
However, during the inspection
process, badly misshapen fruit is
identified using calipers that precisely
measure the dimensions of the fruit.
Consequently, fruit that appears to meet
the grade requirement based on visual
observation occasionally fails to meet
the requirements when measured with
calipers. Containers of packed KAC No.
1 fruit sometimes exceed the tolerance
for misshapen fruit by two or three
pieces of fruit and are required to be resorted and repacked, resulting in
increased costs.
The end of season packout by grade
for kiwifruit for 2011/12 resulted in 1
percent U.S. Fancy, 94 percent U.S. No.
1, and 5 percent KAC No. 1. Although
it accounts for only 5 percent of the
industry pack, KAC No. 1 fruit is the
most difficult to pack because of the
discrepancy between visually
identifying misshapen fruit and
identifying such fruit with calipers
during the inspection process.
Increasing the tolerance for badly
misshapen fruit is expected to reduce
the incidence of containers of KAC No.
1 fruit failing to meet grade
requirements, thereby reducing costs
associated with repacking and re-sorting
failing fruit. It is also expected to help
facilitate and streamline the packing
process by avoiding disruptions
associated with repacking and re-sorting
fruit.
Section 8e of the Act provides that
when certain domestically produced
commodities, including kiwifruit, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of that commodity must
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements.
Since this action would relax the
minimum grade requirement by
increasing the tolerance of kiwifruit
which is ‘‘badly misshapen’’ from 7
percent to 16 percent under the
domestic handling regulations, a
corresponding change to the import
regulations must also be considered.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
Minimum grade, size, quality, and
maturity requirements for kiwifruit
imported into the United States are
currently in effect under § 944.550 (7
CFR 944.550). Paragraph (a) of this
section specifies a tolerance of 7 percent
for badly misshapen fruit. This rule
would increase the tolerance for
imported kiwifruit that is badly
misshapen from 7 percent to 16 percent
to be consistent with the requirements
for California kiwifruit regulated under
the order. The increase in the tolerance
for imports is expected to reduce the
incidence of product that fails to meet
the minimum grade requirement of KAC
No. 1. This would help reduce costs
associated with product that fails to
meet import requirements, and would
help to facilitate the importation of
kiwifruit.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Import regulations issued under
the Act are based on those established
under Federal marketing orders.
There are approximately 178 kiwifruit
growers subject to regulation under the
marketing order and approximately 28
handlers in the production area. There
are approximately 53 importers of
kiwifruit. Small agricultural service
firms, which include kiwifruit handlers
and importers, are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $7,000,000, and small
agricultural producers are defined as
those having annual receipts less than
$750,000.
The California Agricultural Statistical
Service (CASS) reported total California
kiwifruit production for the 2011–12
season at 37,700 tons, with an average
price of $775 per ton. Based on the
average price and shipment information
provided by the CASS and the
Committee, the majority of kiwifruit
handlers would be considered small
businesses under the SBA definition.
Based on kiwifruit production and price
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43759
information, as well as the total number
of California kiwifruit growers, the
average annual grower revenue is less
than $750,000. Thus, the majority of
California kiwifruit producers may also
be classified as small entities. In
addition, based on data from the U.S.
Census Bureau, Department of
Commerce, the value of imported
kiwifruit for 50 of the 53 importers was
less than $7,000,000. Thus, it can be
concluded that the majority of kiwifruit
importers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule relaxes the minimum grade
requirement currently specified in
§ 920.302 (b) of the regulations under
the order by increasing the tolerance for
kiwifruit that is ‘‘badly misshapen’’
from 7 percent to 16 percent under the
definition for KAC No. 1 quality.
This action does not impose any
additional costs on the industry. It is
expected to reduce costs to handlers and
growers of kiwifruit, and to increase
efficiencies in the packing process.
Containers of packed kiwifruit
occasionally fail to meet the minimum
grade requirement of KAC No. 1 quality
because two or three pieces of
misshapen fruit in a container cause the
container to exceed the allowable
tolerance for such fruit. The fruit in
these containers must then be re-sorted
and repacked to meet the minimum
grade requirement. There are costs
associated with re-sorting and
repacking. Assuming a labor cost of
$8.50 per hour and an estimated time of
five to ten minutes to re-sort and repack
a container of fruit, the direct additional
cost per container of fruit could be up
to $1.40. Other costs associated with
repacking and re-sorting fruit include
employee supervision, and the
unstacking and re-stacking of pallets in
order to do the work. These latter types
of costs are difficult to estimate due to
differences in various packing
operations. Some of these costs incurred
by handlers are passed on to the
growers. In addition to these costs, the
re-sorting and repacking of fruit causes
inefficiencies in the packing process, as
packing lines can be interrupted and
employees are diverted from other
duties to repack fruit.
Increasing the tolerance for
misshapen fruit will reduce the amount
of product that fails to meet the
minimum grade, thus reducing resorting and repacking costs and
reducing inefficiencies in the packing
process.
The quality of fruit to consumers is
not expected to be significantly affected.
Based on Committee data, 95 percent of
kiwifruit under the order is packed to a
higher grade standard than the
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
43760
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
minimum grade of KAC No.1. Of the 5
percent packed as KAC No.1, only a
small percentage of those shipments
will be affected by allowing two or three
additional misshapen pieces of fruit in
the container.
Regarding alternatives to this action,
the Committee discussed changing the
current parameters for misshapen fruit;
from ‘‘fruit that is not wider than tall’’
to fruit that is a certain percentage wider
than it is tall. This alternative would
allow for flatter/wider fruit to be packed
than what is currently allowed and
would be even more difficult to
accurately sort fruit visually. The
industry does not want to pack more
fruit that is flatter and wider; they want
to make it easier to accurately identify
and pack the KAC No. 1 grade fruit as
it is currently defined. Therefore, the
Committee rejected this alternative.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Generic
Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
kiwifruit handlers in California or
importers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the Committee meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
California kiwifruit industry. All
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the March 27,
2013, meeting was a public meeting. All
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
Also, the embassies of those countries
that export fruit to the United States and
known kiwifruit importers will be
notified of this interim rule upon its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
publication. Finally, interested persons
are invited to submit comments on this
interim rule, including the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This rule invites comments on
relaxing the minimum grade
requirements for domestic and imported
kiwifruit. Any comments received will
be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
In accordance with section 8e of the
Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the
issuance of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is found that this
interim rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This action relaxes the
current minimum grade requirement
under the order; (2) this change needs
to be in effect by September 15, 2013;
(3) the Committee recommended these
changes at a public meeting and
interested parties had an opportunity to
provide input; and (4) this rule provides
a 60-day comment period and any
comments received will be considered
prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 920
Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards,
Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports, Kiwifruit,
Limes, Olives, Oranges.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR parts 920 and 944 are
amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 920—KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 920 and 944 continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 920.302, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
■
§ 920.302 Grade, size, pack, and container
regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Definitions. The term KAC No. 1
quality means kiwifruit that meets the
requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade as
defined in the United States Standards
for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335
through 51.2340) except that the
kiwifruit shall be ‘‘not badly
misshapen,’’ and an additional tolerance
of 16 percent is provided for kiwifruit
that is ‘‘badly misshapen,’’ and except
that all varieties of kiwifruit are exempt
from the ‘‘tightly packed’’ standard as
defined in § 51.2338(a) of the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit. The
terms fairly uniform in size and
diameter mean the same as defined in
the U.S. Standards for Grades of
Kiwifruit.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 944—FRUITS; IMPORT
REGULATIONS
3. In § 944.550, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 944.550
Kiwifruit import regulation.
(a) Pursuant to section 8e of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended, the importation
into the United States of any kiwifruit
is prohibited unless such kiwifruit
meets all the requirements of a U.S. No.
1 grade as defined in the United States
Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR
51.2335 through 51.2340), except that
the kiwifruit shall be ‘‘not badly
misshapen,’’ and an additional tolerance
of 16 percent is provided for kiwifruit
that is ‘‘badly misshapen,’’ and except
that such kiwifruit shall have a
minimum of 6.2 percent soluble solids.
Such fruit shall be at least Size 45,
which means there shall be a maximum
of 55 pieces of fruit and the average
weight of all samples in a specific lot
must weigh at least 8 pounds (3.632
kilograms), provided that no individual
sample may be less than 7 pounds 12
ounces (3.472 kilograms).
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 140 / Monday, July 22, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 16, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2013–17462 Filed 7–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1222; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–134–AD; Amendment
39–17505; AD 2013–13–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
airworthiness directive (AD) 2011–13–
08 for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model
DHC–8–400 series airplanes. AD 2011–
13–08 required a free-play check for
excessive free-play of the shaft swaged
bearing installed in the tailstock end of
each elevator power control unit (PCU),
and replacing any PCU on which the
bearing exceeds allowable limits with a
serviceable PCU. This new AD adds
airplanes to the applicability from that
of AD 2011–13–08. This AD was
prompted by a determination that
additional airplanes are affected by the
identified unsafe condition. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
excessive free-play of the swaged
bearings, which could lead to excessive
airframe vibrations and difficulties in
pitch control, and consequent loss of
controllability of the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 26, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of August 26, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain other publication listed in
this AD as of August 1, 2011 (76 FR
37253, June 27, 2011).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 19, 2013
Jkt 229001
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7318; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 4, 2012 (77 FR
71729), and proposed to supersede AD
2011–13–08, Amendment 39–16731 (76
FR 37253, June 27, 2011). Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is
the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2010–28R1, dated June 12,
2012 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
states:
Several reports have been received on the
elevator power control units (PCUs) where
the shaft (tailstock) swaged bearing liners had
shown a higher than normal rate of wear.
Investigation revealed that the excessive wear
was due to the paint contamination between
the bearing roller and bearing liner. The
bearing paint contamination is known to be
abrasive and could seize the bearing.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to excessive airframe vibrations and
difficulties in aircraft pitch control.
This [TCCA] directive mandates a free-play
check of the shaft swaged bearing installed in
the elevator PCU tailstock end and
replacement of the shaft swaged bearings if
excessive free-play is found.
This [TCCA] AD is revised to amend the
applicability for DHC–8 Series 400
aeroplanes.
The unsafe condition is loss of
controllability of the airplane. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comments received.
Request To Clarify Applicability
Bombardier, Inc. stated that the
applicability in the NPRM (77 FR 71729,
December 4, 2012) is ‘‘ambiguous.’’
Bombardier noted that the applicability
specifies a serial number range of
airplanes, but the NPRM could be
interpreted to apply to those PCUs or
bearings installed on the airplane at the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
43761
time of manufacture. Bombardier added
that the preamble and service
information sections of the NPRM
contribute to this interpretation by
citing paint contamination during
airplane manufacture as the basis for
bearing wear, in addition to the
identification of PCUs and bearings by
part number. Bombardier stated that the
affected airplanes have a production run
between the years 2000 and 2010; the
PCUs are line replaceable units and
could have been removed from an
affected airplane and installed on an
airplane outside of the serial number
range. Bombardier concluded that if the
intent of the NPRM is to apply to PCUs
installed at the time of airplane
manufacture, there are no provisions to
account for those PCUs in the NPRM or
in the service information.
We infer that the commenter wants
clarification of the applicability. We
agree to clarify. This AD applies only to
those airplanes having serial numbers
(S/Ns) 4001 through 4334 inclusive, and
4336, and matches the applicability of
Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–
2010–28R1, dated June 12, 2012. Based
on the infrequent removal and
replacement of single actuators, we have
determined it is not necessary to
include additional airplanes in the
applicability at this time. To alter the
applicability to include additional
airplanes would require additional
rulemaking. We find that delaying this
action would be inappropriate in light
of the identified unsafe condition.
However, we might consider additional
rulemaking to address any airplanes that
might be identified in the future as
having an affected PCU or bearing. We
have made no change to this AD in this
regard.
Request To Give Credit for Previous
Accomplishment of Certain Inspections
Bombardier also stated that
maintenance review board (MRB) Task
273000–213, ‘‘Functional Check of the
Elevator Free Play,’’ was introduced on
February 10, 2011, with a 12,000-flighthour interval. Bombardier added that
the NPRM (77 FR 71729, December 4,
2012) contains no provisions for giving
credit for inspections accomplished
using the MRB task, which applies to all
airplanes and addresses excessive
elevator free-play, regardless of the
source.
We disagree to give credit for previous
accomplishment of the free-play
inspections using that MRB task because
that task does not meet the requirements
in this AD. The free-play inspections in
this AD must be performed at the
required compliance times in
accordance with Bombardier Service
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 140 (Monday, July 22, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43758-43761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17462]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 920 and 944
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-13-0032; FV13-920-1 IR]
Kiwifruit Grown in California and Imported Kiwifruit; Relaxation
of Minimum Grade Requirement
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement under the
marketing order for kiwifruit grown in California (order), and for
kiwifruit imported into the United States that are shipped to the fresh
market, by increasing the tolerance of kiwifruit which is ``badly
misshapen'' from 7 percent to 16 percent. The order is administered
locally by the Kiwifruit Administrative Committee (Committee). This
change is intended to facilitate the packing of fruit to meet the
minimum grade requirement of ``KAC No. 1'', and reduce costs associated
with re-sorting and repacking this grade of fruit. The change in the
import regulation is required under section 8e of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937.
DATES: July 25, 2013; comments received by September 20, 2013 will be
considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the document number
and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathie M. Notoro, Marketing
Specialist, or Martin Engeler, Regional Director, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or Email: Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 920, as amended (7 CFR part 920), regulating the handling of
kiwifruit in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The
order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
This rule is also issued under section 8e of the Act, which
provides that whenever certain specified commodities, including
kiwifruit, are regulated under a Federal marketing order, imports of
these commodities into the United States are prohibited unless they
meet the same or comparable grade, size, quality, or maturity
requirements as those in effect for the domestically produced
commodities.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of import regulations
issued under section 8e of the Act.
Under the terms of the marketing order, fresh market shipments of
California kiwifruit are required to be inspected and are subject to
grade, size, maturity, pack, and container requirements. Current
requirements include specifications that such shipments be at least
Size 45, grade at least KAC No. 1 quality, and contain a minimum of 6.2
percent soluble solids.
This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement under the
definition for KAC No. 1 kiwifruit quality by increasing the tolerance
for ``badly misshapen'' fruit from 7 percent to 16 percent. The
Committee unanimously recommended these changes at a meeting on March
27, 2013.
Section 920.52 of the order provides, in part, the authority to
regulate the handling of kiwifruit and specifically, in paragraph
(a)(1), the Secretary may limit, during any period or periods, the
shipment of any particular grade, size, quality, maturity, or pack, or
any combination thereof, of any variety or varieties of kiwifruit grown
in the production area.
Section 920.302 establishes regulations regarding grade, size,
pack, and container regulations. Paragraph (a) (1) specifies that the
minimum grade be at least KAC No.1 quality and paragraph (b) defines
that the term KAC No. 1 quality means kiwifruit that meets the
requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade as defined in the United States
Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335 through 51.2340)
except that the kiwifruit shall be ``not badly misshapen,'' and a
tolerance of 7 percent is provided for kiwifruit that is ``badly
misshapen,'' and except that all varieties of kiwifruit are exempt from
the ``tightly packed'' standard as defined in Sec. 51.2338(a) of the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit. The terms fairly uniform in
size and diameter mean the same as defined in the U.S. Standards for
Grades of Kiwifruit.
At its meeting, the Committee recommended revising paragraph (b) of
920.302 to increase the tolerance for ``badly misshapen'' fruit from 7
percent to 16 percent. ``Badly misshapen fruit'' is defined in the
United States
[[Page 43759]]
Standards for Kiwifruit as fruit that is so decidedly deformed that its
appearance is seriously affected.
Most kiwifruit naturally grow in an ``egg'' shape. A small
percentage of fruit develop into a flat, wide, almost square shape.
Such fruit, if it is wider than it is tall, is considered to be badly
misshapen. Identification of badly misshapen fruit is performed
visually during the packing process, and this fruit is manually sorted
out by packinghouse employees. The flat/wide fruit is separated from
the cylindrical fruit and packed into different boxes so that there is
a uniformity of shape within the containers.
However, during the inspection process, badly misshapen fruit is
identified using calipers that precisely measure the dimensions of the
fruit. Consequently, fruit that appears to meet the grade requirement
based on visual observation occasionally fails to meet the requirements
when measured with calipers. Containers of packed KAC No. 1 fruit
sometimes exceed the tolerance for misshapen fruit by two or three
pieces of fruit and are required to be re-sorted and repacked,
resulting in increased costs.
The end of season packout by grade for kiwifruit for 2011/12
resulted in 1 percent U.S. Fancy, 94 percent U.S. No. 1, and 5 percent
KAC No. 1. Although it accounts for only 5 percent of the industry
pack, KAC No. 1 fruit is the most difficult to pack because of the
discrepancy between visually identifying misshapen fruit and
identifying such fruit with calipers during the inspection process.
Increasing the tolerance for badly misshapen fruit is expected to
reduce the incidence of containers of KAC No. 1 fruit failing to meet
grade requirements, thereby reducing costs associated with repacking
and re-sorting failing fruit. It is also expected to help facilitate
and streamline the packing process by avoiding disruptions associated
with repacking and re-sorting fruit.
Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically
produced commodities, including kiwifruit, are regulated under a
Federal marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same
or comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. Since
this action would relax the minimum grade requirement by increasing the
tolerance of kiwifruit which is ``badly misshapen'' from 7 percent to
16 percent under the domestic handling regulations, a corresponding
change to the import regulations must also be considered.
Minimum grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements for
kiwifruit imported into the United States are currently in effect under
Sec. 944.550 (7 CFR 944.550). Paragraph (a) of this section specifies
a tolerance of 7 percent for badly misshapen fruit. This rule would
increase the tolerance for imported kiwifruit that is badly misshapen
from 7 percent to 16 percent to be consistent with the requirements for
California kiwifruit regulated under the order. The increase in the
tolerance for imports is expected to reduce the incidence of product
that fails to meet the minimum grade requirement of KAC No. 1. This
would help reduce costs associated with product that fails to meet
import requirements, and would help to facilitate the importation of
kiwifruit.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Import regulations issued under
the Act are based on those established under Federal marketing orders.
There are approximately 178 kiwifruit growers subject to regulation
under the marketing order and approximately 28 handlers in the
production area. There are approximately 53 importers of kiwifruit.
Small agricultural service firms, which include kiwifruit handlers and
importers, are defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual
receipts less than $750,000.
The California Agricultural Statistical Service (CASS) reported
total California kiwifruit production for the 2011-12 season at 37,700
tons, with an average price of $775 per ton. Based on the average price
and shipment information provided by the CASS and the Committee, the
majority of kiwifruit handlers would be considered small businesses
under the SBA definition. Based on kiwifruit production and price
information, as well as the total number of California kiwifruit
growers, the average annual grower revenue is less than $750,000. Thus,
the majority of California kiwifruit producers may also be classified
as small entities. In addition, based on data from the U.S. Census
Bureau, Department of Commerce, the value of imported kiwifruit for 50
of the 53 importers was less than $7,000,000. Thus, it can be concluded
that the majority of kiwifruit importers may be classified as small
entities.
This rule relaxes the minimum grade requirement currently specified
in Sec. 920.302 (b) of the regulations under the order by increasing
the tolerance for kiwifruit that is ``badly misshapen'' from 7 percent
to 16 percent under the definition for KAC No. 1 quality.
This action does not impose any additional costs on the industry.
It is expected to reduce costs to handlers and growers of kiwifruit,
and to increase efficiencies in the packing process. Containers of
packed kiwifruit occasionally fail to meet the minimum grade
requirement of KAC No. 1 quality because two or three pieces of
misshapen fruit in a container cause the container to exceed the
allowable tolerance for such fruit. The fruit in these containers must
then be re-sorted and repacked to meet the minimum grade requirement.
There are costs associated with re-sorting and repacking. Assuming a
labor cost of $8.50 per hour and an estimated time of five to ten
minutes to re-sort and repack a container of fruit, the direct
additional cost per container of fruit could be up to $1.40. Other
costs associated with repacking and re-sorting fruit include employee
supervision, and the unstacking and re-stacking of pallets in order to
do the work. These latter types of costs are difficult to estimate due
to differences in various packing operations. Some of these costs
incurred by handlers are passed on to the growers. In addition to these
costs, the re-sorting and repacking of fruit causes inefficiencies in
the packing process, as packing lines can be interrupted and employees
are diverted from other duties to repack fruit.
Increasing the tolerance for misshapen fruit will reduce the amount
of product that fails to meet the minimum grade, thus reducing re-
sorting and repacking costs and reducing inefficiencies in the packing
process.
The quality of fruit to consumers is not expected to be
significantly affected. Based on Committee data, 95 percent of
kiwifruit under the order is packed to a higher grade standard than the
[[Page 43760]]
minimum grade of KAC No.1. Of the 5 percent packed as KAC No.1, only a
small percentage of those shipments will be affected by allowing two or
three additional misshapen pieces of fruit in the container.
Regarding alternatives to this action, the Committee discussed
changing the current parameters for misshapen fruit; from ``fruit that
is not wider than tall'' to fruit that is a certain percentage wider
than it is tall. This alternative would allow for flatter/wider fruit
to be packed than what is currently allowed and would be even more
difficult to accurately sort fruit visually. The industry does not want
to pack more fruit that is flatter and wider; they want to make it
easier to accurately identify and pack the KAC No. 1 grade fruit as it
is currently defined. Therefore, the Committee rejected this
alternative.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Generic Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large kiwifruit handlers in California
or importers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
Further, the Committee meeting was widely publicized throughout the
California kiwifruit industry. All interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the March 27, 2013, meeting was a public meeting.
All entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on
this issue. Also, the embassies of those countries that export fruit to
the United States and known kiwifruit importers will be notified of
this interim rule upon its publication. Finally, interested persons are
invited to submit comments on this interim rule, including the
regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at:
www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about
the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on relaxing the minimum grade
requirements for domestic and imported kiwifruit. Any comments received
will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
In accordance with section 8e of the Act, the United States Trade
Representative has concurred with the issuance of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
this interim rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This action relaxes the current minimum grade requirement
under the order; (2) this change needs to be in effect by September 15,
2013; (3) the Committee recommended these changes at a public meeting
and interested parties had an opportunity to provide input; and (4)
this rule provides a 60-day comment period and any comments received
will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 920
Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements.
7 CFR Part 944
Avocados, Food grades and standards, Grapefruit, Grapes, Imports,
Kiwifruit, Limes, Olives, Oranges.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR parts 920 and 944
are amended as follows:
PART 920--KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 920 and 944 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 920.302, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 920.302 Grade, size, pack, and container regulations.
* * * * *
(b) Definitions. The term KAC No. 1 quality means kiwifruit that
meets the requirements of the U.S. No. 1 grade as defined in the United
States Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335 through
51.2340) except that the kiwifruit shall be ``not badly misshapen,''
and an additional tolerance of 16 percent is provided for kiwifruit
that is ``badly misshapen,'' and except that all varieties of kiwifruit
are exempt from the ``tightly packed'' standard as defined in Sec.
51.2338(a) of the U.S. Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit. The terms
fairly uniform in size and diameter mean the same as defined in the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit.
* * * * *
PART 944--FRUITS; IMPORT REGULATIONS
0
3. In Sec. 944.550, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 944.550 Kiwifruit import regulation.
(a) Pursuant to section 8e of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended, the importation into the United States of any
kiwifruit is prohibited unless such kiwifruit meets all the
requirements of a U.S. No. 1 grade as defined in the United States
Standards for Grades of Kiwifruit (7 CFR 51.2335 through 51.2340),
except that the kiwifruit shall be ``not badly misshapen,'' and an
additional tolerance of 16 percent is provided for kiwifruit that is
``badly misshapen,'' and except that such kiwifruit shall have a
minimum of 6.2 percent soluble solids. Such fruit shall be at least
Size 45, which means there shall be a maximum of 55 pieces of fruit and
the average weight of all samples in a specific lot must weigh at least
8 pounds (3.632 kilograms), provided that no individual sample may be
less than 7 pounds 12 ounces (3.472 kilograms).
* * * * *
[[Page 43761]]
Dated: July 16, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-17462 Filed 7-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P