Federal Acquisition Regulation; Submission for OMB Review; Contract Funding-Limitation of Costs/Funds, 43203-43205 [2013-17389]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Ocean Transportation Intermediary
License Revocations and Terminations
The Commission gives notice that the
following Ocean Transportation
Intermediary licenses have been
revoked or terminated for the reason
shown pursuant to section 19 of the
Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. 40101)
effective on the date shown.
License No.: 3388NF.
Name: OCI Forwarding Services, Inc.
dba Metro Line.
Address: 1225 Greenbriar Drive, Suite
E, Addison, IL 60101.
Date Revoked: May 30, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 3714F.
Name: A & E International, Inc.
Address: 16449 1–45 Feeder South.
Centerville, TX 75833.
Date Revoked: June 1, 2013.
Reason: Voluntary Surrender of
License.
License No.: 4097F.
Name: Ashby, Wendy Lyn dba
Cargocare.
Address: 107 Woodcrest Drive,
Chehalis, WA 98532.
Date Revoked: June 6, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 4313F.
Name: Lopez, Miguel Angel dba
Marine Air Land International Services.
Address: 3478 Investment Blvd.,
Hayward, CA 94545.
Date Revoked: June 8, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 17123N.
Name: Express Freight International,
Inc.
Address: 2027 Williams Street, San
Leandro, CA 94577.
Date Revoked: May 24, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 017292N.
Name: Pudong Trans USA, Inc.
Address: 9660 Flair Drive, Suite 328,
El Monte, CA 91731.
Date Revoked: May 26, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 019906F.
Name: Atlantic Air Express, LLC.
Address: 1893 Country Route 1,
Westtown, NY 10998.
Date Revoked: June 18, 2013.
Reason: Voluntary Surrender of
License.
License No.: 021156F.
Name: Aprile USA, Inc. dba Allied
Seafreight Line.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
Address: 1370 Broadway, Suite 1400,
New York, NY 10018.
Date Revoked: June 1, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 021995F.
Name: Deakins Trans-Global
Logistics, LLC.
Address: 6817 South Point Parkway,
Suite 101, Jacksonville, FL 32216.
Date Revoked: June 8, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 022605N.
Name: AK Solutions Inc.
Address: 10034 Halston Drive,
Sugarland, TX 77498.
Date Revoked: May 27, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 022714N.
Name: Seapassion Logistics Inc.
Address: 20819 Currier Road, Unit
400, City of Industry, CA 91789.
Date Revoked: June 3, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 023800F.
Name: Joseph P. Solomon dba
Equitorial Import-Export.
Address: 20526 76th Avenue West,
Suite A, Edmonds, WA 98026.
Date Revoked: June 11, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
License No.: 023846NF.
Name: International Cargo Shipping
LLC.
Address: 11354 Burbank Blvd., Suite
C, North Hollywood, CA 91601.
Date Revoked: June 6, 2013.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid
bond.
James A. Nussbaumer,
Deputy Director, Bureau of Certification and
Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2013–17309 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
43203
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than August
5, 2013.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414:
1. Veranda L. Dickens, Chicago,
Illinois; to acquire voting shares of
Seaway Bancshares, Inc., and thereby
indirectly acquire voting shares of
Seaway Bank and Trust Company, both
in Chicago, Illinois.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(Yvonne Sparks, Community
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St.
Louis, Missouri 63166–2034:
1. Richard A. Torti, Sr., as executor of
the estate of Layton P. Stuart, both of
Little Rock, Arkansas; to retain voting
shares of OneFinancial Corporation, and
thereby indirectly retain voting shares of
One Bank & Trust, National Association,
both in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 16, 2013.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–17357 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0074: Sequence 44]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Submission for OMB Review; Contract
Funding—Limitation of Costs/Funds
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension of an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a
previously approved information
collection requirement concerning
limitation of costs/funds. A notice was
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
43204
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
published in the Federal Register at 77
FR 75163, on December 19, 2012. Two
comments were received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0074, Contract Funding—
Limitation of Costs/Funds by any of the
following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal by searching the
OMB control number. Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘Information Collection 9000–
0074, Contract Funding—Limitation of
Costs/Funds’’. Follow the instructions
provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0074,
Contract Funding—Limitation of Costs/
Funds’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Notice,
Washington, DC 20405–0001. ATTN:
Hada Flowers/IC 9000–0074, Contract
Funding—Limitation of Costs/Funds.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0074, Contract Funding—
Limitation of Costs/Funds, in all
correspondence related to this
collection. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 501–3221
or email Edward.chambers@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Firms performing under Federal costreimbursement contracts are required to
notify the contracting officer in writing
whenever they have reason to believe—
(1) The costs the contractors expect to
incur under the contracts in the next 60
days, when added to all costs previously
incurred, will exceed 75 percent of the
estimated cost of the contracts; or
(2) The total cost for the performance
of the contracts will be greater or
substantially less than estimated.
As a part of the notification, the
contractors must provide a revised
estimate of total cost.
B. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted public
comments on the extension of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
previously approved information
collection. The analysis of these public
comments is summarized as follows:
Comment: The respondent
commented that the extension of the
information collection would violate the
fundamental purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act because of the burden it
puts on the entity submitting the
information and the agency collecting
the information.
Response: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
agencies can request OMB approval of
an existing information collection. The
PRA requires that agencies use the
Federal Register notice and comment
process, to extend OMB’s approval, at
least every three years. This extension,
to a previously approved information
collection, pertains to FAR clauses
52.232–20 and 52.232–22. These clauses
require contractors performing under
Federal cost-reimbursement contracts to
notify the contracting officer in writing
whenever they have reason to believe—
(1) The costs the contractors expect to
incur under the contracts in the next 60
days, when added to all costs previously
incurred, will exceed 75 percent of the
estimated cost of the contracts; or
(2) The total cost for the performance
of the contracts will be greater or
substantially less than estimated. As a
part of the notification, the contractors
must provide a revised estimate of total
cost.
These notifications assist the
Government in its effort to provide
timely funding of cost reimbursement
contracts. The lack of such notifications
increases the risk that funding may
lapse, resulting in contract work
stoppages. This clause has existed
substantially the same since the
inception of the FAR.
Comment: The respondent
commented that the agency did not
accurately estimate the public burden,
challenging that the agency’s
methodology for calculating it is
insufficient and inadequate and does
not reflect the total burden. First, the
respondent questioned the basis for the
estimated number of respondents of
3,598, stating that it appears to be
understated. The respondent also
questioned the basis for the estimate of
15.96999 responses per respondent,
stating that the five decimal places
imply a precise calculation underlying
the estimate. Finally, the respondent
stated that the average burden estimate
of 0.5 hours per response is
unrealistically low and unsubstantiated.
For this reason, the respondent
contends that the agency should
reassess the estimated total burden
hours and revise the estimate upwards
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to be more accurate, as was done in FAR
Case 2007–006. The same respondent
also provided that the burden of
compliance with the information
collection requirement outweighs any
potential utility of the extension.
Response: Serious consideration is
given, during the open comment period,
to all comments received and
adjustments are made to the paperwork
burden estimate based on reasonable
considerations provided by the public.
This is evidenced, as the respondent
notes, in FAR Case 2007–006 where an
adjustment was made from the total
preparation hours from three to 60. This
change was made considering
particularly the hours that would be
required for review within the company,
prior to release to the Government.
The burden is prepared taking into
consideration the necessary criteria in
OMB guidance for estimating the
paperwork burden put on the entity
submitting the information. For
example, consideration is given to an
entity reviewing instructions; using
technology to collect, process, and
disclose information; adjusting existing
practices to comply with requirements;
searching data sources; completing and
reviewing the response; and
transmitting or disclosing information.
The estimated burden hours for a
collection are based on an average
between the hours that a simple
disclosure by a very small business
might require and the much higher
numbers that might be required for a
very complex disclosure by a major
corporation. Also, the estimated burden
hours should only include projected
hours for those actions which a
company would not undertake in the
normal course of business. Careful
consideration went into assessing the
estimated burden hours for this
collection, and although the respondent
provided estimates of responses and
burden hours, the estimates cannot be
confirmed with any degree of certainty
to totally rely on the information.
However, it is determined that an
upward adjustment is warranted at this
time based upon consideration of the
information provided in the public
comment. The information collection
requirement has been revised to reflect
an overall increase in the total public
burden hours.
The estimates of the number of
respondents and the number of
responses per respondent are based on
data from the Federal Procurement Data
System—Next Generation (FPDS–NG)
for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011. For FY 2011
there were 3,598 unique vendors with
57,460 funding only actions under cost
reimbursement contracts. These funding
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 139 / Friday, July 19, 2013 / Notices
actions are usually the result of the
notification required by this information
requirement. The number of responses
per respondent (15.96999) was derived
by dividing the number of actions by the
number of unique vendors. The
preciseness of the number of responses
demonstrates the level of review and the
serious consideration given to the data
gathered for this information collection.
However, in response to the public
comment received, the number of
responses per respondent has been
rounded up to 16.
With regard to the estimate of 0.5
hours per response, we believe that the
notification typically involves an
observation of the contractors
accounting and financial reporting
system that available funds will fall
below the 75 percent threshold within
the next 60 days, followed by a very
brief letter to the contracting officer
referencing the applicable contract
clause at FAR 52.232–20 or FAR
52.232–22. The contractor’s
responsibility to foresee the availability
of funds and probable cost overruns
carries with it a duty to maintain an
accounting and financial reporting
system capable of securing timely
knowledge of all probable costs before
they are incurred. This information
collection does not require contractors
to create or maintain any record or
system that the contractor does not
maintain in its ordinary course of
business. Therefore, the estimated
burden hour per response of 30 minutes
for this collection of information is
valid. However, the rounding of the
annual number of responses per
respondent from 15.96999 to 16, based
upon consideration of the information
provided by the respondent, resulted in
a revision to the information collection
requirement to reflect an overall
increase in the total public burden
hours.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 3,598.
Responses Per Respondent: 16.
Annual Responses: 57,568.
Hours Per Response: .500.
Total Burden Hours: 28,784.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1800 F
Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20417, telephone (202) 501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0074,
Contract Funding—Limitation of Costs/
Funds, in all correspondence.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:33 Jul 18, 2013
Jkt 229001
43205
Dated: July 15, 2013.
Karlos Morgan,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
of this event. The clause at 52.242–13
requires contractors to notify the
contracting officer within 5 days after
the contractor enters into bankruptcy.
[FR Doc. 2013–17389 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]
Respondents: 790.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 790.
Hours per Response: 1.25.
Total Burden Hours: 988.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1800 F
Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20405–0001, telephone (202) 501–4755.
Please cite OMB Control No. 9000–0108,
Bankruptcy, in all correspondence.
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Docket 2012–0076; Sequence 51; OMB
Control No. 9000–0108]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Submission for OMB Review;
Bankruptcy (FAR Subpart 42.9; 52.242–
13)
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
regarding the extension of a previously
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, Regulatory
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
an extension of a previously approved
information collection requirement
concerning Bankruptcy. A notice was
published in the Federal Register at 77
FR 73660, December 11, 2012. No
comments were received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden, to: General Services
Administration, FAR Desk Officer,
OMB, Room 10102, NEOB, Washington,
DC 20503. Please cite OMB Control No.
9000–0108, Bankruptcy, in all
correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
Analyst, Contract Policy Division, GSA,
(202) 501–1448 or email
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
SUMMARY:
A. Purpose
Under statute, contractors may enter
into bankruptcy which may have a
significant impact on the contractor’s
ability to perform its Government
contract. The Government often does
not receive adequate and timely notice
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Dated: July 15, 2013.
William Clark,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide
Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–17390 Filed 7–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry
[Docket No. ATSDR–2013–0002]
Proposed Substances To Be Evaluated
for Set 27 Toxicological Profiles
Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry (ATSDR),
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Request for comments on the
proposed substances to be evaluated for
Set 27 toxicological profiles.
AGENCY:
The Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR) within the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) is
initiating the development of its 27th set
of toxicological profiles (CERCLA Set
27). This notice announces the list of
proposed substances that will be
evaluated for Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act(CERCLA) Set 27
toxicological profile development.
ATSDR’s Division of Toxicology and
Human Health Sciences is soliciting
public nominations from the list of
proposed substances to be evaluated for
toxicological profile development.
ATSDR also will consider the
nomination of any additional, nonCERCLA substances that may have
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JYN1.SGM
19JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43203-43205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17389]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0074: Sequence 44]
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Submission for OMB Review;
Contract Funding--Limitation of Costs/Funds
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension of
an existing OMB clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat will be submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an extension of a
previously approved information collection requirement concerning
limitation of costs/funds. A notice was
[[Page 43204]]
published in the Federal Register at 77 FR 75163, on December 19, 2012.
Two comments were received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000-
0074, Contract Funding--Limitation of Costs/Funds by any of the
following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the
OMB control number. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that
corresponds with ``Information Collection 9000-0074, Contract Funding--
Limitation of Costs/Funds''. Follow the instructions provided at the
``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if
any), and ``Information Collection 9000-0074, Contract Funding--
Limitation of Costs/Funds'' on your attached document.
Fax: 202-501-4067.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Notice, Washington, DC
20405-0001. ATTN: Hada Flowers/IC 9000-0074, Contract Funding--
Limitation of Costs/Funds.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 9000-0074, Contract Funding--Limitation of Costs/Funds, in
all correspondence related to this collection. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Edward N. Chambers, Procurement
Analyst, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, GSA (202) 501-
3221 or email Edward.chambers@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
Firms performing under Federal cost-reimbursement contracts are
required to notify the contracting officer in writing whenever they
have reason to believe--
(1) The costs the contractors expect to incur under the contracts
in the next 60 days, when added to all costs previously incurred, will
exceed 75 percent of the estimated cost of the contracts; or
(2) The total cost for the performance of the contracts will be
greater or substantially less than estimated.
As a part of the notification, the contractors must provide a
revised estimate of total cost.
B. Discussion and Analysis
One respondent submitted public comments on the extension of the
previously approved information collection. The analysis of these
public comments is summarized as follows:
Comment: The respondent commented that the extension of the
information collection would violate the fundamental purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act because of the burden it puts on the entity
submitting the information and the agency collecting the information.
Response: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA),
agencies can request OMB approval of an existing information
collection. The PRA requires that agencies use the Federal Register
notice and comment process, to extend OMB's approval, at least every
three years. This extension, to a previously approved information
collection, pertains to FAR clauses 52.232-20 and 52.232-22. These
clauses require contractors performing under Federal cost-reimbursement
contracts to notify the contracting officer in writing whenever they
have reason to believe--
(1) The costs the contractors expect to incur under the contracts
in the next 60 days, when added to all costs previously incurred, will
exceed 75 percent of the estimated cost of the contracts; or
(2) The total cost for the performance of the contracts will be
greater or substantially less than estimated. As a part of the
notification, the contractors must provide a revised estimate of total
cost.
These notifications assist the Government in its effort to provide
timely funding of cost reimbursement contracts. The lack of such
notifications increases the risk that funding may lapse, resulting in
contract work stoppages. This clause has existed substantially the same
since the inception of the FAR.
Comment: The respondent commented that the agency did not
accurately estimate the public burden, challenging that the agency's
methodology for calculating it is insufficient and inadequate and does
not reflect the total burden. First, the respondent questioned the
basis for the estimated number of respondents of 3,598, stating that it
appears to be understated. The respondent also questioned the basis for
the estimate of 15.96999 responses per respondent, stating that the
five decimal places imply a precise calculation underlying the
estimate. Finally, the respondent stated that the average burden
estimate of 0.5 hours per response is unrealistically low and
unsubstantiated. For this reason, the respondent contends that the
agency should reassess the estimated total burden hours and revise the
estimate upwards to be more accurate, as was done in FAR Case 2007-006.
The same respondent also provided that the burden of compliance with
the information collection requirement outweighs any potential utility
of the extension.
Response: Serious consideration is given, during the open comment
period, to all comments received and adjustments are made to the
paperwork burden estimate based on reasonable considerations provided
by the public. This is evidenced, as the respondent notes, in FAR Case
2007-006 where an adjustment was made from the total preparation hours
from three to 60. This change was made considering particularly the
hours that would be required for review within the company, prior to
release to the Government.
The burden is prepared taking into consideration the necessary
criteria in OMB guidance for estimating the paperwork burden put on the
entity submitting the information. For example, consideration is given
to an entity reviewing instructions; using technology to collect,
process, and disclose information; adjusting existing practices to
comply with requirements; searching data sources; completing and
reviewing the response; and transmitting or disclosing information. The
estimated burden hours for a collection are based on an average between
the hours that a simple disclosure by a very small business might
require and the much higher numbers that might be required for a very
complex disclosure by a major corporation. Also, the estimated burden
hours should only include projected hours for those actions which a
company would not undertake in the normal course of business. Careful
consideration went into assessing the estimated burden hours for this
collection, and although the respondent provided estimates of responses
and burden hours, the estimates cannot be confirmed with any degree of
certainty to totally rely on the information. However, it is determined
that an upward adjustment is warranted at this time based upon
consideration of the information provided in the public comment. The
information collection requirement has been revised to reflect an
overall increase in the total public burden hours.
The estimates of the number of respondents and the number of
responses per respondent are based on data from the Federal Procurement
Data System--Next Generation (FPDS-NG) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011. For
FY 2011 there were 3,598 unique vendors with 57,460 funding only
actions under cost reimbursement contracts. These funding
[[Page 43205]]
actions are usually the result of the notification required by this
information requirement. The number of responses per respondent
(15.96999) was derived by dividing the number of actions by the number
of unique vendors. The preciseness of the number of responses
demonstrates the level of review and the serious consideration given to
the data gathered for this information collection. However, in response
to the public comment received, the number of responses per respondent
has been rounded up to 16.
With regard to the estimate of 0.5 hours per response, we believe
that the notification typically involves an observation of the
contractors accounting and financial reporting system that available
funds will fall below the 75 percent threshold within the next 60 days,
followed by a very brief letter to the contracting officer referencing
the applicable contract clause at FAR 52.232-20 or FAR 52.232-22. The
contractor's responsibility to foresee the availability of funds and
probable cost overruns carries with it a duty to maintain an accounting
and financial reporting system capable of securing timely knowledge of
all probable costs before they are incurred. This information
collection does not require contractors to create or maintain any
record or system that the contractor does not maintain in its ordinary
course of business. Therefore, the estimated burden hour per response
of 30 minutes for this collection of information is valid. However, the
rounding of the annual number of responses per respondent from 15.96999
to 16, based upon consideration of the information provided by the
respondent, resulted in a revision to the information collection
requirement to reflect an overall increase in the total public burden
hours.
C. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 3,598.
Responses Per Respondent: 16.
Annual Responses: 57,568.
Hours Per Response: .500.
Total Burden Hours: 28,784.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., 2nd
Floor, Washington, DC 20417, telephone (202) 501-4755. Please cite OMB
Control No. 9000-0074, Contract Funding--Limitation of Costs/Funds, in
all correspondence.
Dated: July 15, 2013.
Karlos Morgan,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of
Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office
of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-17389 Filed 7-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P