Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations Based on the 2012 Missile Technology Control Regime Plenary Agreements, 42430-42436 [2013-16954]
Download as PDF
42430
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
comply with the law and the standards
listed above, due to limits on the powers
of the sponsor and/or other local
governments, or on other legal limits on
the sponsor’s discretion to adopt certain
measures. Other sponsors have the
capability to adopt measures to satisfy
the compliance standards but have not
done so. The FAA may consider a
commercial service airport sponsor’s
inability to comply with the law and/or
the minimum compliance standards as
a militating factor in its review of
requests for discretionary funding.
6. Commercial service airports that
fail to submit an access plan. The FAA
expects commercial service airport
sponsors with existing residential
through-the-fence access to develop an
access plan which addresses the law,
preserves their proprietary rights and
powers, and mitigates the inherent
challenges posed by this practice.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2015, a
sponsor’s failure to comply with the
Final Policy may jeopardize its ability to
compete for discretionary AIP grant
funding.
B. Requests to extend residential
through-the-fence access at airports
covered by this Final Policy
As of the date of the enactment of
Public Law 112–95 (February 14, 2012),
a sponsor of a commercial service
airport proposing to extend an access
agreement must submit a current airport
master plan and a revised residential
through-the-fence access plan as
detailed below. The ADO or regional
division will forward its
recommendations regarding each
request to extend access to the Manager
of Airport Compliance. Only the
Manager of Airport Compliance may
approve a sponsor’s request to extend
access. In reviewing the proposal, the
Manager of Airport Compliance may
consult with TSA.
1. Master Plan. A sponsor of a
commercial service airport wishing to
extend an existing residential throughthe-fence access agreement must submit
a recent airport master plan to the ADO
or regional division. The FAA considers
a master plan to be recent if it was
developed or updated within the past 5
years. The master plan should explain
how the sponsor plans to address future
growth, development, and use of the
airport property over the next 20 years;
sponsors should work with ADO or
regional division staff to develop an
appropriate scope of work for these
master plans.
2. Residential through-the-fence
access plan. The sponsor is responsible
for revising its access plan, as discussed
under section III of this Final Policy, to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
reflect how it will meet the standards
for compliance for the extended access.
Once FAA has accepted the revised
access plan, FAA will condition future
AIP grants upon its ongoing
implementation.
3. Continuing obligations. Once the
revised access plan is accepted by FAA,
and if required, the revised ALP, is
approved by FAA, the sponsor must
continue to comply with obligations
described in section IV.A of this Final
Policy.
V. Eligibility for AIP Grants
A. General. Beginning in Fiscal Year
2015, a sponsor of a commercial service
airport with existing residential
through-the-fence access will be
required to submit their residential
through-the-fence access plan prior to
notifying FAA of its intent to apply for
an AIP grant. The sponsor will not lose
eligibility for entitlement grants on the
basis of the through-the-fence access,
but FAA will consider the potential
constraints on the utility of the airport
to be a significant factor in future AIP
funding decisions.
B. Public infrastructure and facilities
with substantial benefit to private
through-the-fence users. The FAA may
be unable to justify the Federal
investment in a proposed project when
private residential developments with
through-the-fence access will receive
substantial value from that federally
assisted airport infrastructure and/or
facility.
C. Exclusive or primary private
benefit. On-airport infrastructure and
facilities used exclusively or primarily
for accommodation of through-the-fence
users are considered private-use and are
ineligible for AIP grants.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 9, 2013.
Randall S. Fiertz,
Director, Airport Compliance and
Management Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2013–16917 Filed 7–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 772 and 774
[Docket No. 130104008–3008–01]
RIN 0694–AF81
Revisions to the Export Administration
Regulations Based on the 2012 Missile
Technology Control Regime Plenary
Agreements
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is amending the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) to
reflect changes to the Missile
Technology Control Regime (MTCR)
Annex that were agreed to by MTCR
member countries at the October 2012
Plenary in Berlin, Germany, and at the
MTCR Reinforced Point of Contact
(RPOC) meeting in Paris, France, in
December 2011. This final rule revises
six Export Control Classification
Numbers (ECCNs) (1C011, 1C111,
1C116, 9A101, 9B105 and 9E101) and
one defined term (the definition of
‘‘payload’’) to implement the changes
that were agreed to at the meetings. This
final rule also revises ECCNs 7E004 and
9D004 to better align the Commerce
Control List (CCL) with the MTCR
Annex and past MTCR agreements.
DATES: This rule is effective: July 16,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Bragonje, Nuclear and Missile
Technology Controls Division, Bureau
of Industry and Security, Phone: (202)
482–0434; Email:
sharon.bragonje@bis.doc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Missile Technology Control
Regime (MTCR) is an export control
arrangement among 34 nations,
including most of the world’s advanced
suppliers of missiles and missile-related
equipment, materials, software and
technology. The regime establishes a
common list of controlled items (the
Annex) and a common export control
policy (the Guidelines) that member
countries implement in accordance with
their national export controls. The
MTCR seeks to limit the risk of
proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction by controlling exports of
goods and technologies that could make
a contribution to delivery systems (other
than manned aircraft) for such weapons.
In 1992, the MTCR’s original focus on
missiles for nuclear weapons delivery
was extended to a focus on the
proliferation of missiles for the delivery
of all types of weapons of mass
destruction (WMD), i.e., nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons. Such
proliferation has been identified as a
threat to international peace and
security. One way to counter this threat
is to maintain vigilance over the transfer
of missile equipment, material, and
related technologies usable for systems
capable of delivering WMD. MTCR
members voluntarily pledge to adopt the
regime’s export Guidelines and to
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
restrict the export of items contained in
the regime’s Annex. The
implementation of the regime’s
Guidelines is effectuated through the
national export control laws and
policies of the regime members.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Amendments to the Export
Administration Regulations
This final rule revises the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) to
reflect changes to the MTCR Annex
agreed to at the October 2012 Plenary in
Berlin, Germany, and the MTCR
December 2011 Reinforced Point of
Contact meeting (RPOC) in Paris,
France. Corresponding MTCR Annex
references are provided below for the
MTCR Annex changes agreed to at the
meetings. This rule also makes two
conforming changes to correlate the
Commerce Control List (CCL)
(Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 of the
EAR) with the current MTCR Annex.
These conforming changes are made to
better align the MT controls on the CCL
with the MTCR Annex and past MTCR
agreements. In the explanation below
for the revisions made in this rule, BIS
identifies these changes as follows:
‘‘Berlin 2012 Plenary,’’ ‘‘Paris 2011
RPOC’’ and ‘‘CCL Conforming Change to
MTCR Annex’’ to assist the public in
understanding the origin of each change
included in this final rule.
In Section 740.20 (License Exception
Strategic Trade Authorization (STA)), as
a conforming change for the revision of
the MT control on ECCN 7E004
described below, this rule amends
paragraph (b)(2) (Limitations on Use of
License Exception STA) by
redesignating paragraph (b)(2)(vii) as
paragraph (b)(2)(viii). Under new
paragraph (b)(2)(vii), this rule continues
the existing limitation on the use of
License Exception STA. Paragraph
(b)(2)(vii) will specify that License
Exception STA may not be used for
7E004 ‘‘technology,’’ except for
‘‘technology’’ controlled under
7E004.a.7. Prior to publication of this
final rule, this ‘‘technology’’ was not
eligible for License Exception STA
because the ‘‘technology’’ was MT
controlled. This change is being made
for consistency with the MTCR Annex.
BIS decided it was still warranted to
exclude the technology under 7E004
that had previously been excluded
under License Exception STA. This
change to License Exception STA
continues the existing limitation on the
use of License Exception STA for 7E004
‘‘technology,’’ so this change preserves
the status quo in terms of License
Exception STA ineligibility under the
EAR for 7E004.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
Additionally, this rule revises the
EAR in Section 772.1 (Definitions of
Terms as Used in the Export
Administration Regulations) by
amending the definition of the term
‘‘payload’’ (MTCR Annex Change,
Definitions: ‘‘Payload,’’ Berlin 2012
Plenary). The definition of ‘‘payload’’ is
revised by changing the description for
space launch vehicles in Technical Note
b.1 from ‘‘satellites’’ to ‘‘spacecraft,
including satellites,’’ and by changing
the description for space launch
vehicles in Technical Note b.2 from
‘‘satellite-to-launch vehicle adapters,’’ to
‘‘spacecraft-to-launch vehicle adapters.’’
The term satellite could be more
limiting than intended, while the term
spacecraft is broader and includes any
type of spacecraft payload that could be
carried on a space launch vehicle. For
these reasons, the MTCR members
decided to revise the definition of
‘‘payload’’ to clarify the scope of the
types of payload for space launch
vehicles that are included in the
‘‘payload’’ definition under Technical
Notes b.1 and b.2. This clarification will
have little impact on items subject to the
EAR, and therefore not cause an
increase in license applications received
by BIS.
In addition, this rule amends the CCL
to reflect changes to the MTCR Annex.
This final rule also revises Export
Control Classification Numbers (ECCNs)
7E004 and 9D004 to better align the CCL
with the MTCR Annex and past MTCR
agreements. Specifically, the following
eight ECCNs are affected:
ECCN 1C011 is amended by revising
the MT control(s) paragraph in the
License Requirements section to
indicate the MT control applies to
1C011.a and .b for materials that meet
or exceed the parameters in 1C111. This
change clarifies that the MT control
applicable to 1C011.b only applies
when the boron or boron alloys also
meet the size requirement specific to the
MTCR Annex (i.e., where at least 90%
of the total particles by particle volume
% or weight % are made up of particles
of less than 60 mm). (MTCR Annex
Change, Category II: Item 4.C.2.e., Berlin
2012 Plenary). Boron and boron alloys
with the purities specified were
previously controlled, but the
interpretation of the size requirement
was not clear between MTCR Partners.
While the text could be read as meaning
that all of the material had to be less
than 60 mm to be controlled, many
Partners were controlling material that
had a median particle size of 60 mm. The
new measurement criteria clarifies that
at least 90% of the material must be less
than 60 mm to be controlled, and the
criteria encompass several techniques
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42431
used for measuring particle size by
including multiple standard reporting
practices within the control text and
providing examples of test methods.
Because the MTCR partners decided to
make the size control more specific,
additional detail was needed to qualify
how the size is to be ascertained and
reported for purposes of determining
whether such material is MT controlled.
The new measurement criteria being
added in this final rule will ensure the
different testing methods currently in
use, such as laser diffraction and sieves,
will be applied in a consistent manner
in determining whether such material is
MT controlled under ECCN 1C011 or
controlled under ECCN 1C111.
Additionally, because boron of this
purity is controlled by both the MTCR,
and for NS reasons, by the Wassenaar
Arrangement (WA), and the WA has not
adopted these changes, this final rule is
implementing the MTCR-agreed change
to 1C011.b by qualifying the scope of
the MT control(s) paragraph. As this
type of boron material typically meets
the specifications of both the prior and
updated text, this change is not
expected to have any impact on the
number of license applications received
by BIS.
ECCN 1C111 is amended by revising
the ‘‘items’’ paragraph (a.1) in the List
of Items Controlled section by including
the term ‘‘spheroidal’’ and removing the
phrase ‘‘particles of uniform diameter’’
from paragraph (a.1). (MTCR Annex
Change, Category II: Item 4.C.2.c., Berlin
2012 Plenary). This change will address
a concern of the MTCR members that
particles that are not exactly spherical
might be interpreted as being outside
the scope of this control. The changes
are being made because aluminum
powder particles are not exactly
spherical. This is a clarification of the
control and is consistent with how BIS
has interpreted the scope of ECCN
1C111. Therefore, this clarification will
have no impact on the number of
license applications received by BIS.
This rule is also removing under
paragraph (a.1) the phrase ‘‘other than
those controlled by the U.S. Munitions
List,’’ because this concept (that items
that are enumerated or described on the
U.S. Munitions List (USML) are subject
to the ITAR and therefore not ‘‘subject
to the EAR’’) is already stated in other
places in the EAR, in particular part 734
(Scope of the Export Administration
Regulations).
ECCN 1C111 is also amended by
revising the ‘‘items’’ paragraph (a.2) in
the List of Items Controlled section to
modify the controls for certain powders.
(MTCR Annex Change, Category II:
Items 4.C.2.d. and 4.C.2.e., Berlin 2012
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
42432
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Plenary). The same interpretation that
applies to the size criteria of boron
powders as described above in ECCN
1C011 applies to zirconium, beryllium,
and magnesium powders. Hence, the
same new measurement criteria in
modified ECCN 1C011 are being applied
to ECCN 1C111 to clarify that at least
90% of the material must be less than
60 mm to be controlled. The criteria also
encompass several techniques used for
measuring particle size by including
multiple standard reporting practices
within the control text and providing
examples of test methods, as described
in detail in the discussion of changes to
ECCN 1C011 above.
In addition, this rule removes the
phrase ‘‘metal fuels and their alloys’’ in
paragraph (a.2) and replaces it with the
more precise and accurate term ‘‘metal
powders’’ to conform to the MTCR
Annex and the intent of this CCL
control. This final rule adds the phrase
‘‘and alloys’’ after ‘‘metal powders’’ to
clarify that although the term metal
fuels is being replaced with the term
metal powders, the scope of paragraph
(a.2) still extends to alloys of those
metal powders. This rule also removes
under paragraph (a.2) the phrase ‘‘other
than those controlled by the U.S.
Munitions List,’’ because this concept
(that items that are enumerated or
described on the USML are subject to
the ITAR and therefore not ‘‘subject to
the EAR’’) is already stated in other
places in the EAR, in particular part
734. The criteria in 1C111 are also being
updated in this final rule to clarify that
alloys of these metals are only
controlled when they are 97% or more,
by weight, of zirconium, beryllium, or
magnesium, which is consistent with
how BIS has interpreted the scope of
ECCN 1C111.
This rule also adds the control on
boron powders, previously only
controlled in 1C011, to a new ‘‘items’’
paragraph (a.2.b) to differentiate
between the NS controlled and MT
controlled material. The new
measurement criteria and other criteria
added in 1C111.a.2 in this final rule
clarify exactly what is controlled by
including multiple standard reporting
practices within the control text and
providing examples of test methods.
Because the MTCR partners decided to
make the size control more specific,
additional detail was needed to qualify
how the size is to be ascertained and
reported for purposes of determining
whether such material is MT controlled.
The new measurement criteria being
added in this final rule will ensure the
different testing methods currently in
use, such as laser diffraction and sieves,
will be applied in a consistent manner
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
in determining whether such material is
MT controlled under ECCN 1C111 or
controlled under 1C011. As with the
boron control, the type of metal
powders typically exported currently
meet the specifications of both the
previous and the updated control text,
and this change is not expected to have
any impact on the number of license
applications received by BIS.
Paragraph (a.2.a.4) of ECCN 1C111 is
being removed to clearly reflect the
interpretation that alloys controlled
would fall within the 97% weight
requirement of paragraph (a.2.a). As a
conforming change to the removal of
paragraph (a.2.a.4), this rule revises
paragraph (a.2.a.2) to add the word ‘‘or’’
and revises paragraph (a.2.a.3) to
remove the word ‘‘or’’ and the
semicolon, and replace that text and
punctuation with a period.
Finally, in ECCN 1C111 this rule also
adds a new note at the end of the
‘‘items’’ paragraph in the List of Items
Controlled section to indicate that in a
multimodal particle distribution (e.g.,
mixtures of different grain sizes) in
which one or more modes are
controlled, the entire powder mixture is
controlled.
ECCN 1C116 is amended by revising
the heading and the ‘‘items’’ paragraph
in the List of Items Controlled section
regarding maraging steel classified
under 1C116. (MTCR Annex Change
Category II: Item 6.C.8., Paris 2011
RPOC). First, the rule expands the scope
of the control criteria to ensure that
maraging steel that has missile
applications is adequately enumerated
within the scope of this ECCN.
Specifically, this rule revises the
heading and adds an ‘‘items’’ paragraph
(a) and (b) in the List of Items controlled
section to expand the scope of the
control.
In addition to expanding the control
criteria, this final rule revises the
‘‘items’’ paragraph to add new notes (a)
and (b) to identify that maraging steels
are iron alloys generally characterized
by the criteria included in these notes.
The MTCR members agreed to this
change because maraging steel is often
exported in the solution annealed stage
and then further worked (i.e., processed)
at the destination before being
precipitation hardened. Therefore,
maraging steel that has missile
applications could have potentially
avoided control, under ECCN 1C116, by
being exported or reexported before
being hardened into its final stage. This
final rule addresses this missile
proliferation concern by expanding the
scope of 1C116 to define the ultimate
tensile strength of maraging steel usable
in missile applications in both the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
solution annealed stage and the
precipitation hardened stage, and
controlling both under 1C116. This
expansion will result in an increase of
one or two license applications per year,
so the overall impact on the number of
license applications received by BIS
will be minimal.
ECCN 7E004 is amended by revising
the MT control(s) paragraph in the
License Requirements section to
indicate that where ‘‘technology’’ for
equipment or systems controlled for MT
reasons is not controlled under ECCNs
7E001,7E002, 7E101, 7E104, and 9E101,
it is controlled under ECCN 7E004 for
MT reasons. (MTCR Annex Category II:
Item 10.E.3)
ECCN 7E004 is also amended by
revising the ‘‘related controls’’
paragraph to add ECCNs 7E001, 7E002,
7E101 and 9E101 as additional related
controls under two new ‘‘related
controls’’ paragraphs. Specifically, this
rule revises the ‘‘related controls’’ under
7E004 to include ECCNs 7E001, 7E002,
7E101 and 7E994 as a new ‘‘Related
Controls’’ paragraph (2). This rule also
revises the ‘‘related controls’’ to include
ECCNs 7E104 and 9E101 as a new
‘‘Related Controls’’ paragraph (3), and
adds details for when 7E104 and 9E101
should also be reviewed for MT
controlled technology. The remaining
‘‘related controls’’ text in 7E004
becomes new ‘‘Related Controls’’
paragraph (1). (MTCR Annex Category
II: Item 9.E.1., 10.E.1., 10.E.2., and
10.E.3.; CCL Conforming Change to
MTCR Annex). This conforming change
will result in the revision of the MT
control on 7E004 technology. However,
because certain portions of the MT
control are being retained in 7E004 to
conform to the MTCR Annex, and the
remaining technology is controlled for
NS reasons, the impact on the number
of license applications received per year
will be minimal and likely will result in
a decrease of one or two license
applications per year. Also as described
above under the changes being made to
License Exception STA, 7E004 will
continue to be ineligible for License
Exception STA, except for ‘‘technology’’
controlled under 7E004.a.7. Lastly, in
7E004, BIS adds an STA paragraph to
the License Exception section to make it
explicit that License Exception STA
may not be used for 7E004, except for
7E004.a.7. This new STA paragraph
conforms to the exclusion being added
to License Exception STA under
paragraph (b)(2)(vii) for 7E004
‘‘technology,’’ except for ‘‘technology’’
controlled under 7E004.a.7.
ECCN 9A101 is amended by revising
the ‘‘related definitions’’ paragraph in
the List of Items Controlled section to
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
add an ECCN-specific definition for
‘maximum thrust value.’ (MTCR Annex
Change, Category II: Item 3.A.1.a.1.,
Technical Note, Berlin 2012 Plenary).
There is a possible discrepancy between
the actual thrust value of an engine and
what it is certified to, which could lead
to certain engines used on small aircraft
being unintentionally caught by this
control. This definition coincides with
the way BIS currently interprets this
control. However, this interpretation
was not true of all MTCR Partners and
the addition of the note makes the
control more uniform. This clarification
will have no impact on the number of
license applications received by BIS.
ECCN 9B105 is amended by replacing
the term wind tunnels in the heading
with the term ‘aerodynamic test
facilities’ (which, as noted in the new
technical note described below,
includes wind tunnels and shock
tunnels), adding a note, and adding one
technical note to the ‘‘items’’ paragraph
in the List of Items Controlled section.
(MTCR Annex Change, Category II: Item
15.B.2., Berlin 2012 Plenary). The new
note is an exclusion note specifying that
ECCN 9B105 does not control wind
tunnels for speeds of Mach 3 or less
with the dimension of the test cross
section size equal to or less than 250
mm. This specific decontrol helps to
clarify what is usable for rockets,
missiles, or unmanned aerial vehicles
capable of achieving a range equal to or
greater than 300 km and the subsystems
of these items. This final rule also adds
two new technical notes to assist the
public in understanding and applying
the revised ECCN 9B105. The first
technical note clarifies that
‘aerodynamic test facilities’ includes
wind tunnels and shock tunnels for the
study of airflow over objects. This final
rule adds the second technical note to
assist the public in understanding and
applying the new exclusion note for
9B105 by clarifying that ‘test cross
section size’ means the diameter of the
circle, or the side of the square, or the
longest side of the rectangle, or the
major axis of the ellipse at the largest
test cross section location. In addition,
this second new technical note clarifies
that the ‘test cross section’ is the section
perpendicular to the flow direction.
ECCN 9D004 is amended by revising
the MT control(s) paragraph in the
License Requirements section to
indicate the MT control does not apply
to this entry. This change is made to
more closely align the scope of this MT
control with the MTCR Annex. (No
MTCR Annex reference is applicable to
all of the software described in 9D004;
CCL Conforming Change to MTCR
Annex). This change will result in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
removal of the MT control on 9D004
software, as the corresponding MTCR
Annex entry related to this control is
already controlled in ECCN 9D104.
However, because the 9D004 software
remains controlled for NS reasons, the
impact on the number of license
applications received per year will be
minimal, resulting in a decrease of one
or two per year. Lastly, to alert people
regarding other related software
controls, 9D004 is amended by revising
the ‘‘related controls’’ paragraph in the
List of Items Controlled section to add
a reference to 9D104.
ECCN 9E101 is amended by revising
the heading and the ‘‘related controls’’
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled
section to add a reference to ECCN
9A103. (MTCR Annex Change, Category
II: Item 3.E.1., Paris 2011 RPOC). This
final rule makes this change because the
MTCR Annex was updated to include
technology for liquid propellant tanks
specially designed for propellants
specified by 4.C. in the Annex or used
in Category I rocket systems. These
commodities and the related technology
are ‘‘subject to the ITAR,’’ and the
commodities are referenced on the CCL
under 9A103. This change will have no
impact on the number of license
applications received by BIS because
ECCNs 9E101 and 9A103 are both
‘‘subject to the ITAR,’’ so the change is
limited to updating the scope of an
ECCN cross reference between two
ECCNs that are ‘‘subject to the ITAR.’’
The heading has also been changed to
reflect that the MT control only applies
to 9A012 commodities that are
themselves controlled for MT reasons.
This change is made to more closely
align the scope of this MT control with
the MTCR Annex. (Category II: Item
19.A.2., CCL Conforming Change to
MTCR Annex). This clarification will
have no impact on the number of
license applications received by BIS.
Savings Clause
Shipments of items removed from
eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license
(NLR) as a result of this regulatory
action that were on dock for loading, on
lighter, laden aboard an exporting or
reexporting carrier, or en route aboard a
carrier to a port of export or reexport, on
July 16, 2013, pursuant to actual orders
for export or reexport to a foreign
destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous
eligibility for a License Exception or
export or reexport without a license
(NLR) so long as they are exported or
reexported before August 15, 2013. Any
such items not actually exported or
reexported before midnight, on August
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42433
15, 2013, require a license in accordance
with this rule.
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013),
and as extended by the Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16,
2012), has continued the EAR in effect
under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, as appropriate and
to the extent permitted by law, pursuant
to Executive Order 13222.
Regulatory Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number. This rule affects
the following approved collection:
Simplified Network Application
Processing System (control number
0694–0088), which includes, among
other things, license applications and
carries a burden estimate of 58 minutes
for a manual or electronic submission.
Send comments regarding these burden
estimates or any other aspect of these
collections of information, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
OMB Desk Officer, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503;
and to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk
Officer, by email at
Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to (202) 395–7285; and to the Office
of Administration, Bureau of Industry
and Security, Department of Commerce,
14th and Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Room 6622, Washington, DC 20230.
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
42434
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, the opportunity for public
participation, and a delay in effective
date, are inapplicable because this
regulation involves a military and
foreign affairs function of the United
States (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). Immediate
implementation of these amendments
fulfills the United States’ international
obligations to the MTCR. The MTCR
contributes to international security and
regional stability by promoting greater
responsibility in transfers of missile
technology items, thus preventing
destabilizing accumulations of such
items. The MTCR consists of 34 member
countries that act on a consensus basis
and the changes set forth in this rule
implement agreements reached by
MTCR member countries at the October
2012 Plenary in Berlin, Germany and at
the MTCR Reinforced Point of Contact
(RPOC) meeting in Paris, France in
December 2011. Since the United States
is a significant exporter of the items in
this rule, implementation of this
provision is necessary for the MTCR to
achieve its purpose. Moreover, it is in
the public’s interest to waive the notice
and comment requirements, as any
delay in implementing this rule will
disrupt the movement of affected items
globally because of disharmony between
export control measures implemented
by MTCR members, resulting in tension
between member countries. Export
controls work best when all countries
implement the same export controls in
a timely manner. If this rulemaking
were delayed to allow for notice and
comment and a 30 day delay in
effectiveness, it would prevent the
United States from fulfilling its
commitment to the MTCR in a timely
manner, would injure the credibility of
the United States in this and other
multilateral regimes, and may impair
the international communities’ ability to
effectively control the export of certain
potentially national- and internationalsecurity-threatening materials.
Further, no other law requires that a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule under
the Administrative Procedure Act or by
any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
not applicable. Therefore, this
regulation is issued in final form.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 740
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 772
Exports.
1. Spacecraft (single or multiple),
including satellites;
2. Spacecraft-to-launch vehicle
adapters including, if applicable,
apogee/perigee kick motors or similar
maneuvering systems;
*
*
*
*
*
PART 774—[AMENDED]
15 CFR Part 774
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 774 continues to read as follows:
■
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, parts 740, 772 and 774
of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) are
amended as follows:
PART 740—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 740 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77
FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
2. Section 740.20 is amended:
a. By redesignating paragraphs
(b)(2)(vii) through (b)(2)(ix) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(viii) through (b)(2)(x);
and
■ b. By adding paragraph (b)(2)(vii) to
read as follows:
■
■
§ 740.20 License Exception Strategic
Trade Authorization (STA).
*
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77
FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
6. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
1—Special Materials and Related
Equipment, Chemicals,
‘‘Microorganisms’’ and ‘‘Toxins,’’ Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
1C011 is amended:
■ a. By revising the heading; and
■ b. By revising the ‘‘MT’’ paragraph in
the License Requirements section to
read as follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774—The
Commerce Control List
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) Commerce Control List Category
7 limitation on use of License Exception
STA. License Exception STA may not be
used for 7E004 ‘‘technology,’’ except for
‘‘technology’’ controlled under
7E004.a.7.
*
*
*
*
*
1C011 Metals and compounds, other than
those specified in 1C111, as follows (see
List of Items Controlled).
PART 772—[AMENDED]
■
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 772 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
MT applies to
1C011.a and .b for
items that meet or
exceed the parameters in 1C111.
*
4. Section 772.1 is amended by
revising Technical Notes b of the
‘‘payload’’ definition as set forth below:
■
§ 772.1 Definitions of terms as used in the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR).
*
*
*
*
Payload. * * *
*
TECHNICAL NOTES:
a. * * *
b. Space Launch Vehicles—‘‘Payload’’
includes:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
License Requirements
Reason for Control: * * *
Control(s)
*
*
*
*
Country chart
*
*
*
*
MT Column 1.
*
*
*
*
*
*
7. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
1—Special Materials and Related
Equipment, Chemicals,
‘‘Microorganisms’’ and ‘‘Toxins,’’ Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
1C111 is amended:
■ a. By revising ‘‘items’’ paragraphs a.1,
introductory text of paragraph a.2,
paragraph a.2.a.2 and paragraph a.2.a.3
in the List of Items Controlled section;
■
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
b. By removing ‘‘items’’ paragraph
a.2.a.4 in the List of Items Controlled
section;
■ c. By adding ‘‘items’’ paragraph a.2.b
in the List of Items Controlled section;
and
■ d. By adding a note to at the end of
the ‘‘items’’ paragraph in the List of
Items Controlled section after ‘‘items’’
paragraph c.5 to read as follows:
a.1. 0.9 GPa in the solution annealed stage;
■
1C111 Propellants and constituent
chemicals for propellants, other than
those specified in 1C011, as follows (see
List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Items:
*
a.1. Spherical or spheroidal aluminum
powder in particle of size of less than 200 x
10¥6 m (200 mm) and with an aluminum
content of 97% by weight or more, if at least
10% of the total weight is made up of
particles of less than 63 mm, according to ISO
2591:1988 or national equivalents.
Technical Note: * * *
a.2. Metal powders and alloys where at
least 90% of the total particles by particle
volume or weight are made up of particles of
less than 60 mm (determined by measurement
techniques such as using a sieve, laser
diffraction or optical scanning), whether
spherical, atomized, spheroidal, flaked or
ground, as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
a.2.a.2. Beryllium; or
a.2.a.3. Magnesium.
a.2.b Boron or boron alloys with a boron
content of 85% or more by weight.
Technical Note: * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Note: In a multimodal particle distribution
(e.g., mixtures of different grain sizes) in
which one or more modes are controlled, the
entire powder mixture is controlled.
8. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
1—Special Materials and Related
Equipment, Chemicals,
‘‘Microorganisms’’ and ‘‘Toxins,’’ Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
1C116 is amended:
■ a. By revising the heading;
■ b. By revising the ‘‘items’’ paragraph
in the List of Items Controlled section;
and
■ c. By adding a new ‘‘technical note’’
to the ‘items’’ paragraph in the List of
Items Controlled section to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
1C116 Maraging steels having both of the
following (see List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7E004 Other ‘‘technology’’ as follows (see
List of Items Controlled).
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
*
*
*
10. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
9—Aerospace and Propulsion, Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
9A101 is amended:
■ a. By revising the ‘‘related
definitions’’ paragraph in the List of
Items Controlled section; and
■ b. By adding single quotes around the
phrase ‘maximum thrust value’ in
‘‘items’’ paragraph a.1 in the List of
Items Controlled section to read as
follows:
■
9A101 Turbojet and turbofan engines, other
than those controlled by 9A001, as follows
(see List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
License Requirements
List of Items Controlled
Reason for Control: * * *
Related Definitions: ‘Maximum thrust value’
in 9A101.a.1 is the manufacturer’s
demonstrated maximum thrust for the
engine type un-installed. The civil type
certified thrust value will be equal to or
less than the manufacturer’s demonstrated
maximum thrust for the engine type.
Control(s)
*
*
*
*
*
*
Country chart
*
MT applies to ‘‘technology’’ for equipment or systems
controlled for MT
reasons.
*
MT Column 1.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
STA: (1) Paragraph (c)(1) of License
Exception STA (§ 740.20(c)(1) of the EAR)
may not be used for 7E004, except for
7E004.a.7. (2) Paragraph (c)(2) of License
Exception STA (§ 740.20(c)(2) of the EAR)
may not be used for 7E004, except for
7E004.a.7.
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: (1) See 0D521 No. 2
(‘‘source code’’ for the ‘‘development’’ of
fly-by-wire control systems), 0E521 No. 6
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
11. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
9—Aerospace and Propulsion, Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
9B105 is amended:
■ a. By revising the heading; and
■ b. By adding a new ‘‘note’’ and two
new ‘‘technical notes’’ to the end of the
‘items’’ paragraph in the List of Items
Controlled section to read as follows:
■
License Exceptions
*
*
Items:
a. Having an ultimate tensile strength,
measured at 20°C, equal to or greater than:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
9. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
7—Navigation and Avionics, Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
7E004 is amended:
■ a. By revising the ‘‘MT’’ paragraph in
the License Requirements section;
■ b. By adding a License Exception STA
paragraph at the end of the License
Exceptions section; and
■ c. By revising the ‘‘related controls’’
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled
section, to ready as follows.
■
List of Items Controlled
List of Items Controlled
(for ‘‘technology’’ for the ‘‘development’’ of
‘‘software’’ controlled by 0D521 No. 2). (2)
See also 7E001, 7E002, 7E101, and 7E994.
(3) In addition to the Related Controls in
7E001, 7E002, and 7E101 that include MT
controls, also see the MT controls in 7E104
for design ‘‘technology’’ for the integration
of the flight control, guidance, and
propulsion data into a flight management
system, designed or modified for rockets or
missiles capable of achieving a ‘‘range’’
equal to or greater than 300 km, for
optimization of rocket system trajectory;
and also see 9E101 for design ‘‘technology’’
for integration of air vehicle fuselage,
propulsion system and lifting control
surfaces, designed or modified for
unmanned aerial vehicles capable of
achieving a ‘‘range’’ equal to or greater than
300 km, to optimize aerodynamic
performance throughout the flight regime
of an unmanned aerial vehicle.
or
a.2. 1.5 GPa in the precipitation hardened
stage; and
b. Any of the following forms:
b.1 Sheet, plate or tubing with a wall or
plate thickness equal to or less than 5.0 mm;
or
b.2 Tubular forms with a wall thickness
equal to or less than 50 mm and having an
inner diameter equal to or greater than 270
mm.
Technical Note:
Maraging steels are iron alloys that are
generally:
a. Characterized by high nickel, very low
carbon content and use substitutional
elements or precipitates to produce
strengthening and age-hardening of the alloy;
and
b. Subjected to heat treatment cycles to
facilitate the martensitic transformation
process (solution annealed stage) and
subsequently age hardened (precipitation
hardened stage).
42435
Sfmt 4700
9B105 ‘Aerodynamic test facilities’ for
speeds of Mach 0.9 or more, usable for
rockets, missiles, or unmanned aerial
vehicles capable of achieving a ‘‘range’’
equal to or greater than 300 km and
their subsystems.
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
*
16JYR1
*
*
*
42436
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 136 / Tuesday, July 16, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Items: * * *
Note: 9B105 does not control wind tunnels
for speeds of Mach 3 or less with the
dimension of the ‘test cross section size’
equal to or less than 250 mm.
Technical Notes:
1. ‘Aerodynamic test facilities’ includes
wind tunnels and shock tunnels for the study
of airflow over objects.
2. ‘Test cross section size’ means the
diameter of the circle, or the side of the
square, or the longest side of the rectangle,
or the major axis of the ellipse at the largest
‘test cross section’ location. ‘Test cross
section’ is the section perpendicular to the
flow direction.
9E101 ‘‘Technology’’ according to the
General Technology Note for the
‘‘development,’’ ‘‘production,’’ or ‘‘use’’
of commodities or software controlled
by 9A012 (for MT controlled
commodities only), 9A101, 9A103 to
9A111, 9A115 to 9A119, 9C110, 9D101,
9D103, 9D104 or 9D105.
12. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
9—Aerospace and Propulsion, Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
9D004 is amended:
■ a. By removing the ‘‘MT’’ paragraph in
the License Requirements section; and
■ b. By revising the ‘‘related controls’’
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled
section to read as follows:
*
■
9D004 Other ‘‘software’’ as follows (see List
of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: ‘‘Technology’’ controlled
by 9E101 for items in 9A101.b, 9A103 to
9A111, 9A115 to 9A119, 9D103, and 9D105
is ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts
120 through 130).
*
*
*
*
*
13. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774
(the Commerce Control List), Category
9—Aerospace and Propulsion, Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
9E101 is amended:
■ a. By revising the heading; and
■ b. By revising the ‘‘related controls’’
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled
section to read as follows:
■
DATES:
Effective date: July 30, 2013.
John
W. Dunfee, Assistant General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Center,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581; 202–418–5396; jdunfee@cftc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
*
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–16954 Filed 7–15–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
In FR Doc.
2013–12133 appearing on page 32866 in
the Federal Register of Friday, May 31,
2013, the following correction is made:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
RIN 3038–AD08
Related Controls: See also 9D104.
*
*
List of Items Controlled
17 CFR Part 43
List of Items Controlled
*
*
Register of May 31, 2013 (78 FR 32866).
The final rule adopted regulations,
under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
defining the criteria for grouping swaps
into separate swap categories and
establishing methodologies for setting
appropriate minimum block sizes for
each swap category. These corrections
fix errors in certain contract
descriptions, block sizes, and block
units listed in Appendix F to the final
rule.
Procedures To Establish Appropriate
Minimum Block Sizes for Large
Notional Off-Facility Swaps and Block
Trades; Correction
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission is correcting a
final rule that appeared in the Federal
SUMMARY:
Appendix F to Part 43—Initial
Appropriate Minimum Block Sizes by
Asset Class for Block Trades and Large
Notional Off-Facility Swaps [Corrected]
1. On page 32942, in the third
column, in Appendix F to Part 43—
Initial Appropriate Minimum Block
Sizes by Asset Class for Block Trades
and Large Notional Off-Facility Swaps,
correct Appendix F by removing all of
the tables published on pages 32942
through 32944 and adding the following
corrected tables in their place:
Currency group
Currencies
Super-Major Currencies ..............
United States dollar (USD), European Union Euro Area euro (EUR), United Kingdom pound sterling (GBP),
and Japan yen (JPY).
Australia dollar (AUD), Switzerland franc (CHF), Canada dollar (CAD), Republic of South Africa rand (ZAR),
Republic of Korea won (KRW), Kingdom of Sweden krona (SEK), New Zealand dollar (NZD), Kingdom of
Norway krone (NOK), and Denmark krone (DKK).
All other currencies.
Major Currencies .........................
Non-Major Currencies .................
INTEREST RATE SWAPS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Currency group
Tenor greater than
Tenor less than or equal to
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Super-Major .................................
Major ............................................
Major ............................................
Major ............................................
Major ............................................
......................................................................
46 days ........................................................
Three months (107 days) ............................
Six months (198 days) ................................
One year (381 days) ...................................
Two years (746 days) .................................
Five years (1,842 days) ..............................
Ten years (3,668 days) ...............................
30 years (10,973 days) ...............................
......................................................................
46 days ........................................................
Three months (107 days) ............................
Six months (198 days) ................................
46 days ........................................................
Three months (107 days) ............................
Six months (198 days) ................................
One year (381 days) ...................................
Two years (746 days) .................................
Five years (1,842 days) ..............................
Ten years (3,668 days) ...............................
30 years (10,973 days) ...............................
......................................................................
46 days ........................................................
Three months (107 days) ............................
Six months (198 days) ................................
One year (381 days) ...................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:29 Jul 15, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
50% Notional
(in millions)
6,400
2,100
1,200
1,100
460
240
170
120
67
2,200
580
440
220
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 16, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42430-42436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16954]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 740, 772 and 774
[Docket No. 130104008-3008-01]
RIN 0694-AF81
Revisions to the Export Administration Regulations Based on the
2012 Missile Technology Control Regime Plenary Agreements
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is amending the
Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to reflect changes to the
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex that were agreed to by
MTCR member countries at the October 2012 Plenary in Berlin, Germany,
and at the MTCR Reinforced Point of Contact (RPOC) meeting in Paris,
France, in December 2011. This final rule revises six Export Control
Classification Numbers (ECCNs) (1C011, 1C111, 1C116, 9A101, 9B105 and
9E101) and one defined term (the definition of ``payload'') to
implement the changes that were agreed to at the meetings. This final
rule also revises ECCNs 7E004 and 9D004 to better align the Commerce
Control List (CCL) with the MTCR Annex and past MTCR agreements.
DATES: This rule is effective: July 16, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Bragonje, Nuclear and Missile
Technology Controls Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, Phone:
(202) 482-0434; Email: sharon.bragonje@bis.doc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) is an export control
arrangement among 34 nations, including most of the world's advanced
suppliers of missiles and missile-related equipment, materials,
software and technology. The regime establishes a common list of
controlled items (the Annex) and a common export control policy (the
Guidelines) that member countries implement in accordance with their
national export controls. The MTCR seeks to limit the risk of
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction by controlling exports of
goods and technologies that could make a contribution to delivery
systems (other than manned aircraft) for such weapons.
In 1992, the MTCR's original focus on missiles for nuclear weapons
delivery was extended to a focus on the proliferation of missiles for
the delivery of all types of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), i.e.,
nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. Such proliferation has been
identified as a threat to international peace and security. One way to
counter this threat is to maintain vigilance over the transfer of
missile equipment, material, and related technologies usable for
systems capable of delivering WMD. MTCR members voluntarily pledge to
adopt the regime's export Guidelines and to
[[Page 42431]]
restrict the export of items contained in the regime's Annex. The
implementation of the regime's Guidelines is effectuated through the
national export control laws and policies of the regime members.
Amendments to the Export Administration Regulations
This final rule revises the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)
to reflect changes to the MTCR Annex agreed to at the October 2012
Plenary in Berlin, Germany, and the MTCR December 2011 Reinforced Point
of Contact meeting (RPOC) in Paris, France. Corresponding MTCR Annex
references are provided below for the MTCR Annex changes agreed to at
the meetings. This rule also makes two conforming changes to correlate
the Commerce Control List (CCL) (Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 of the
EAR) with the current MTCR Annex. These conforming changes are made to
better align the MT controls on the CCL with the MTCR Annex and past
MTCR agreements. In the explanation below for the revisions made in
this rule, BIS identifies these changes as follows: ``Berlin 2012
Plenary,'' ``Paris 2011 RPOC'' and ``CCL Conforming Change to MTCR
Annex'' to assist the public in understanding the origin of each change
included in this final rule.
In Section 740.20 (License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization
(STA)), as a conforming change for the revision of the MT control on
ECCN 7E004 described below, this rule amends paragraph (b)(2)
(Limitations on Use of License Exception STA) by redesignating
paragraph (b)(2)(vii) as paragraph (b)(2)(viii). Under new paragraph
(b)(2)(vii), this rule continues the existing limitation on the use of
License Exception STA. Paragraph (b)(2)(vii) will specify that License
Exception STA may not be used for 7E004 ``technology,'' except for
``technology'' controlled under 7E004.a.7. Prior to publication of this
final rule, this ``technology'' was not eligible for License Exception
STA because the ``technology'' was MT controlled. This change is being
made for consistency with the MTCR Annex. BIS decided it was still
warranted to exclude the technology under 7E004 that had previously
been excluded under License Exception STA. This change to License
Exception STA continues the existing limitation on the use of License
Exception STA for 7E004 ``technology,'' so this change preserves the
status quo in terms of License Exception STA ineligibility under the
EAR for 7E004.
Additionally, this rule revises the EAR in Section 772.1
(Definitions of Terms as Used in the Export Administration Regulations)
by amending the definition of the term ``payload'' (MTCR Annex Change,
Definitions: ``Payload,'' Berlin 2012 Plenary). The definition of
``payload'' is revised by changing the description for space launch
vehicles in Technical Note b.1 from ``satellites'' to ``spacecraft,
including satellites,'' and by changing the description for space
launch vehicles in Technical Note b.2 from ``satellite-to-launch
vehicle adapters,'' to ``spacecraft-to-launch vehicle adapters.'' The
term satellite could be more limiting than intended, while the term
spacecraft is broader and includes any type of spacecraft payload that
could be carried on a space launch vehicle. For these reasons, the MTCR
members decided to revise the definition of ``payload'' to clarify the
scope of the types of payload for space launch vehicles that are
included in the ``payload'' definition under Technical Notes b.1 and
b.2. This clarification will have little impact on items subject to the
EAR, and therefore not cause an increase in license applications
received by BIS.
In addition, this rule amends the CCL to reflect changes to the
MTCR Annex. This final rule also revises Export Control Classification
Numbers (ECCNs) 7E004 and 9D004 to better align the CCL with the MTCR
Annex and past MTCR agreements. Specifically, the following eight ECCNs
are affected:
ECCN 1C011 is amended by revising the MT control(s) paragraph in
the License Requirements section to indicate the MT control applies to
1C011.a and .b for materials that meet or exceed the parameters in
1C111. This change clarifies that the MT control applicable to 1C011.b
only applies when the boron or boron alloys also meet the size
requirement specific to the MTCR Annex (i.e., where at least 90% of the
total particles by particle volume % or weight % are made up of
particles of less than 60 [micro]m). (MTCR Annex Change, Category II:
Item 4.C.2.e., Berlin 2012 Plenary). Boron and boron alloys with the
purities specified were previously controlled, but the interpretation
of the size requirement was not clear between MTCR Partners. While the
text could be read as meaning that all of the material had to be less
than 60 [micro]m to be controlled, many Partners were controlling
material that had a median particle size of 60 [micro]m. The new
measurement criteria clarifies that at least 90% of the material must
be less than 60 [micro]m to be controlled, and the criteria encompass
several techniques used for measuring particle size by including
multiple standard reporting practices within the control text and
providing examples of test methods. Because the MTCR partners decided
to make the size control more specific, additional detail was needed to
qualify how the size is to be ascertained and reported for purposes of
determining whether such material is MT controlled. The new measurement
criteria being added in this final rule will ensure the different
testing methods currently in use, such as laser diffraction and sieves,
will be applied in a consistent manner in determining whether such
material is MT controlled under ECCN 1C011 or controlled under ECCN
1C111.
Additionally, because boron of this purity is controlled by both
the MTCR, and for NS reasons, by the Wassenaar Arrangement (WA), and
the WA has not adopted these changes, this final rule is implementing
the MTCR-agreed change to 1C011.b by qualifying the scope of the MT
control(s) paragraph. As this type of boron material typically meets
the specifications of both the prior and updated text, this change is
not expected to have any impact on the number of license applications
received by BIS.
ECCN 1C111 is amended by revising the ``items'' paragraph (a.1) in
the List of Items Controlled section by including the term
``spheroidal'' and removing the phrase ``particles of uniform
diameter'' from paragraph (a.1). (MTCR Annex Change, Category II: Item
4.C.2.c., Berlin 2012 Plenary). This change will address a concern of
the MTCR members that particles that are not exactly spherical might be
interpreted as being outside the scope of this control. The changes are
being made because aluminum powder particles are not exactly spherical.
This is a clarification of the control and is consistent with how BIS
has interpreted the scope of ECCN 1C111. Therefore, this clarification
will have no impact on the number of license applications received by
BIS. This rule is also removing under paragraph (a.1) the phrase
``other than those controlled by the U.S. Munitions List,'' because
this concept (that items that are enumerated or described on the U.S.
Munitions List (USML) are subject to the ITAR and therefore not
``subject to the EAR'') is already stated in other places in the EAR,
in particular part 734 (Scope of the Export Administration
Regulations).
ECCN 1C111 is also amended by revising the ``items'' paragraph
(a.2) in the List of Items Controlled section to modify the controls
for certain powders. (MTCR Annex Change, Category II: Items 4.C.2.d.
and 4.C.2.e., Berlin 2012
[[Page 42432]]
Plenary). The same interpretation that applies to the size criteria of
boron powders as described above in ECCN 1C011 applies to zirconium,
beryllium, and magnesium powders. Hence, the same new measurement
criteria in modified ECCN 1C011 are being applied to ECCN 1C111 to
clarify that at least 90% of the material must be less than 60 [micro]m
to be controlled. The criteria also encompass several techniques used
for measuring particle size by including multiple standard reporting
practices within the control text and providing examples of test
methods, as described in detail in the discussion of changes to ECCN
1C011 above.
In addition, this rule removes the phrase ``metal fuels and their
alloys'' in paragraph (a.2) and replaces it with the more precise and
accurate term ``metal powders'' to conform to the MTCR Annex and the
intent of this CCL control. This final rule adds the phrase ``and
alloys'' after ``metal powders'' to clarify that although the term
metal fuels is being replaced with the term metal powders, the scope of
paragraph (a.2) still extends to alloys of those metal powders. This
rule also removes under paragraph (a.2) the phrase ``other than those
controlled by the U.S. Munitions List,'' because this concept (that
items that are enumerated or described on the USML are subject to the
ITAR and therefore not ``subject to the EAR'') is already stated in
other places in the EAR, in particular part 734. The criteria in 1C111
are also being updated in this final rule to clarify that alloys of
these metals are only controlled when they are 97% or more, by weight,
of zirconium, beryllium, or magnesium, which is consistent with how BIS
has interpreted the scope of ECCN 1C111.
This rule also adds the control on boron powders, previously only
controlled in 1C011, to a new ``items'' paragraph (a.2.b) to
differentiate between the NS controlled and MT controlled material. The
new measurement criteria and other criteria added in 1C111.a.2 in this
final rule clarify exactly what is controlled by including multiple
standard reporting practices within the control text and providing
examples of test methods. Because the MTCR partners decided to make the
size control more specific, additional detail was needed to qualify how
the size is to be ascertained and reported for purposes of determining
whether such material is MT controlled. The new measurement criteria
being added in this final rule will ensure the different testing
methods currently in use, such as laser diffraction and sieves, will be
applied in a consistent manner in determining whether such material is
MT controlled under ECCN 1C111 or controlled under 1C011. As with the
boron control, the type of metal powders typically exported currently
meet the specifications of both the previous and the updated control
text, and this change is not expected to have any impact on the number
of license applications received by BIS.
Paragraph (a.2.a.4) of ECCN 1C111 is being removed to clearly
reflect the interpretation that alloys controlled would fall within the
97% weight requirement of paragraph (a.2.a). As a conforming change to
the removal of paragraph (a.2.a.4), this rule revises paragraph
(a.2.a.2) to add the word ``or'' and revises paragraph (a.2.a.3) to
remove the word ``or'' and the semicolon, and replace that text and
punctuation with a period.
Finally, in ECCN 1C111 this rule also adds a new note at the end of
the ``items'' paragraph in the List of Items Controlled section to
indicate that in a multimodal particle distribution (e.g., mixtures of
different grain sizes) in which one or more modes are controlled, the
entire powder mixture is controlled.
ECCN 1C116 is amended by revising the heading and the ``items''
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled section regarding maraging
steel classified under 1C116. (MTCR Annex Change Category II: Item
6.C.8., Paris 2011 RPOC). First, the rule expands the scope of the
control criteria to ensure that maraging steel that has missile
applications is adequately enumerated within the scope of this ECCN.
Specifically, this rule revises the heading and adds an ``items''
paragraph (a) and (b) in the List of Items controlled section to expand
the scope of the control.
In addition to expanding the control criteria, this final rule
revises the ``items'' paragraph to add new notes (a) and (b) to
identify that maraging steels are iron alloys generally characterized
by the criteria included in these notes. The MTCR members agreed to
this change because maraging steel is often exported in the solution
annealed stage and then further worked (i.e., processed) at the
destination before being precipitation hardened. Therefore, maraging
steel that has missile applications could have potentially avoided
control, under ECCN 1C116, by being exported or reexported before being
hardened into its final stage. This final rule addresses this missile
proliferation concern by expanding the scope of 1C116 to define the
ultimate tensile strength of maraging steel usable in missile
applications in both the solution annealed stage and the precipitation
hardened stage, and controlling both under 1C116. This expansion will
result in an increase of one or two license applications per year, so
the overall impact on the number of license applications received by
BIS will be minimal.
ECCN 7E004 is amended by revising the MT control(s) paragraph in
the License Requirements section to indicate that where ``technology''
for equipment or systems controlled for MT reasons is not controlled
under ECCNs 7E001,7E002, 7E101, 7E104, and 9E101, it is controlled
under ECCN 7E004 for MT reasons. (MTCR Annex Category II: Item 10.E.3)
ECCN 7E004 is also amended by revising the ``related controls''
paragraph to add ECCNs 7E001, 7E002, 7E101 and 9E101 as additional
related controls under two new ``related controls'' paragraphs.
Specifically, this rule revises the ``related controls'' under 7E004 to
include ECCNs 7E001, 7E002, 7E101 and 7E994 as a new ``Related
Controls'' paragraph (2). This rule also revises the ``related
controls'' to include ECCNs 7E104 and 9E101 as a new ``Related
Controls'' paragraph (3), and adds details for when 7E104 and 9E101
should also be reviewed for MT controlled technology. The remaining
``related controls'' text in 7E004 becomes new ``Related Controls''
paragraph (1). (MTCR Annex Category II: Item 9.E.1., 10.E.1., 10.E.2.,
and 10.E.3.; CCL Conforming Change to MTCR Annex). This conforming
change will result in the revision of the MT control on 7E004
technology. However, because certain portions of the MT control are
being retained in 7E004 to conform to the MTCR Annex, and the remaining
technology is controlled for NS reasons, the impact on the number of
license applications received per year will be minimal and likely will
result in a decrease of one or two license applications per year. Also
as described above under the changes being made to License Exception
STA, 7E004 will continue to be ineligible for License Exception STA,
except for ``technology'' controlled under 7E004.a.7. Lastly, in 7E004,
BIS adds an STA paragraph to the License Exception section to make it
explicit that License Exception STA may not be used for 7E004, except
for 7E004.a.7. This new STA paragraph conforms to the exclusion being
added to License Exception STA under paragraph (b)(2)(vii) for 7E004
``technology,'' except for ``technology'' controlled under 7E004.a.7.
ECCN 9A101 is amended by revising the ``related definitions''
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled section to
[[Page 42433]]
add an ECCN-specific definition for `maximum thrust value.' (MTCR Annex
Change, Category II: Item 3.A.1.a.1., Technical Note, Berlin 2012
Plenary). There is a possible discrepancy between the actual thrust
value of an engine and what it is certified to, which could lead to
certain engines used on small aircraft being unintentionally caught by
this control. This definition coincides with the way BIS currently
interprets this control. However, this interpretation was not true of
all MTCR Partners and the addition of the note makes the control more
uniform. This clarification will have no impact on the number of
license applications received by BIS.
ECCN 9B105 is amended by replacing the term wind tunnels in the
heading with the term `aerodynamic test facilities' (which, as noted in
the new technical note described below, includes wind tunnels and shock
tunnels), adding a note, and adding one technical note to the ``items''
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled section. (MTCR Annex Change,
Category II: Item 15.B.2., Berlin 2012 Plenary). The new note is an
exclusion note specifying that ECCN 9B105 does not control wind tunnels
for speeds of Mach 3 or less with the dimension of the test cross
section size equal to or less than 250 mm. This specific decontrol
helps to clarify what is usable for rockets, missiles, or unmanned
aerial vehicles capable of achieving a range equal to or greater than
300 km and the subsystems of these items. This final rule also adds two
new technical notes to assist the public in understanding and applying
the revised ECCN 9B105. The first technical note clarifies that
`aerodynamic test facilities' includes wind tunnels and shock tunnels
for the study of airflow over objects. This final rule adds the second
technical note to assist the public in understanding and applying the
new exclusion note for 9B105 by clarifying that `test cross section
size' means the diameter of the circle, or the side of the square, or
the longest side of the rectangle, or the major axis of the ellipse at
the largest test cross section location. In addition, this second new
technical note clarifies that the `test cross section' is the section
perpendicular to the flow direction.
ECCN 9D004 is amended by revising the MT control(s) paragraph in
the License Requirements section to indicate the MT control does not
apply to this entry. This change is made to more closely align the
scope of this MT control with the MTCR Annex. (No MTCR Annex reference
is applicable to all of the software described in 9D004; CCL Conforming
Change to MTCR Annex). This change will result in the removal of the MT
control on 9D004 software, as the corresponding MTCR Annex entry
related to this control is already controlled in ECCN 9D104. However,
because the 9D004 software remains controlled for NS reasons, the
impact on the number of license applications received per year will be
minimal, resulting in a decrease of one or two per year. Lastly, to
alert people regarding other related software controls, 9D004 is
amended by revising the ``related controls'' paragraph in the List of
Items Controlled section to add a reference to 9D104.
ECCN 9E101 is amended by revising the heading and the ``related
controls'' paragraph in the List of Items Controlled section to add a
reference to ECCN 9A103. (MTCR Annex Change, Category II: Item 3.E.1.,
Paris 2011 RPOC). This final rule makes this change because the MTCR
Annex was updated to include technology for liquid propellant tanks
specially designed for propellants specified by 4.C. in the Annex or
used in Category I rocket systems. These commodities and the related
technology are ``subject to the ITAR,'' and the commodities are
referenced on the CCL under 9A103. This change will have no impact on
the number of license applications received by BIS because ECCNs 9E101
and 9A103 are both ``subject to the ITAR,'' so the change is limited to
updating the scope of an ECCN cross reference between two ECCNs that
are ``subject to the ITAR.'' The heading has also been changed to
reflect that the MT control only applies to 9A012 commodities that are
themselves controlled for MT reasons. This change is made to more
closely align the scope of this MT control with the MTCR Annex.
(Category II: Item 19.A.2., CCL Conforming Change to MTCR Annex). This
clarification will have no impact on the number of license applications
received by BIS.
Savings Clause
Shipments of items removed from eligibility for a License Exception
or export or reexport without a license (NLR) as a result of this
regulatory action that were on dock for loading, on lighter, laden
aboard an exporting or reexporting carrier, or en route aboard a
carrier to a port of export or reexport, on July 16, 2013, pursuant to
actual orders for export or reexport to a foreign destination, may
proceed to that destination under the previous eligibility for a
License Exception or export or reexport without a license (NLR) so long
as they are exported or reexported before August 15, 2013. Any such
items not actually exported or reexported before midnight, on August
15, 2013, require a license in accordance with this rule.
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013), and as extended by the Notice of
August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012), has continued the EAR
in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS
continues to carry out the provisions of the Export Administration Act,
as appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, pursuant to
Executive Order 13222.
Regulatory Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB
control number. This rule affects the following approved collection:
Simplified Network Application Processing System (control number 0694-
0088), which includes, among other things, license applications and
carries a burden estimate of 58 minutes for a manual or electronic
submission. Send comments regarding these burden estimates or any other
aspect of these collections of information, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to OMB Desk Officer, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503; and to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk
Officer, by email at Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov or by fax to (202)
395-7285; and to the Office of Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Room 6622, Washington, DC 20230.
[[Page 42434]]
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for
public participation, and a delay in effective date, are inapplicable
because this regulation involves a military and foreign affairs
function of the United States (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). Immediate
implementation of these amendments fulfills the United States'
international obligations to the MTCR. The MTCR contributes to
international security and regional stability by promoting greater
responsibility in transfers of missile technology items, thus
preventing destabilizing accumulations of such items. The MTCR consists
of 34 member countries that act on a consensus basis and the changes
set forth in this rule implement agreements reached by MTCR member
countries at the October 2012 Plenary in Berlin, Germany and at the
MTCR Reinforced Point of Contact (RPOC) meeting in Paris, France in
December 2011. Since the United States is a significant exporter of the
items in this rule, implementation of this provision is necessary for
the MTCR to achieve its purpose. Moreover, it is in the public's
interest to waive the notice and comment requirements, as any delay in
implementing this rule will disrupt the movement of affected items
globally because of disharmony between export control measures
implemented by MTCR members, resulting in tension between member
countries. Export controls work best when all countries implement the
same export controls in a timely manner. If this rulemaking were
delayed to allow for notice and comment and a 30 day delay in
effectiveness, it would prevent the United States from fulfilling its
commitment to the MTCR in a timely manner, would injure the credibility
of the United States in this and other multilateral regimes, and may
impair the international communities' ability to effectively control
the export of certain potentially national- and international-security-
threatening materials.
Further, no other law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking
and an opportunity for public comment be given for this final rule.
Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public
comment are not required to be given for this rule under the
Administrative Procedure Act or by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are not applicable. Therefore, this regulation is issued in final form.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 740
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 772
Exports.
15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, parts 740, 772 and 774 of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774) are amended as follows:
PART 740--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 740 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
2. Section 740.20 is amended:
0
a. By redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(vii) through (b)(2)(ix) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(viii) through (b)(2)(x); and
0
b. By adding paragraph (b)(2)(vii) to read as follows:
Sec. 740.20 License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization (STA).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) Commerce Control List Category 7 limitation on use of License
Exception STA. License Exception STA may not be used for 7E004
``technology,'' except for ``technology'' controlled under 7E004.a.7.
* * * * *
PART 772--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 772 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
4. Section 772.1 is amended by revising Technical Notes b of the
``payload'' definition as set forth below:
Sec. 772.1 Definitions of terms as used in the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR).
* * * * *
Payload. * * *
TECHNICAL NOTES:
a. * * *
b. Space Launch Vehicles--``Payload'' includes:
1. Spacecraft (single or multiple), including satellites;
2. Spacecraft-to-launch vehicle adapters including, if applicable,
apogee/perigee kick motors or similar maneuvering systems;
* * * * *
PART 774--[AMENDED]
0
5. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 774 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 15, 2012, 77 FR 49699 (August 16, 2012).
0
6. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1--Special Materials and Related Equipment, Chemicals,
``Microorganisms'' and ``Toxins,'' Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 1C011 is amended:
0
a. By revising the heading; and
0
b. By revising the ``MT'' paragraph in the License Requirements section
to read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--The Commerce Control List
* * * * *
1C011 Metals and compounds, other than those specified in 1C111, as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: * * *
Control(s) Country chart
* * * * *
MT applies to 1C011.a and .b for items MT Column 1.
that meet or exceed the parameters in
1C111.
* * * * *
* * * * *
0
7. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1--Special Materials and Related Equipment, Chemicals,
``Microorganisms'' and ``Toxins,'' Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 1C111 is amended:
0
a. By revising ``items'' paragraphs a.1, introductory text of paragraph
a.2, paragraph a.2.a.2 and paragraph a.2.a.3 in the List of Items
Controlled section;
[[Page 42435]]
0
b. By removing ``items'' paragraph a.2.a.4 in the List of Items
Controlled section;
0
c. By adding ``items'' paragraph a.2.b in the List of Items Controlled
section; and
0
d. By adding a note to at the end of the ``items'' paragraph in the
List of Items Controlled section after ``items'' paragraph c.5 to read
as follows:
1C111 Propellants and constituent chemicals for propellants, other
than those specified in 1C011, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Items:
* * * * *
a.1. Spherical or spheroidal aluminum powder in particle of size
of less than 200 x 10-\6\ m (200 [mu]m) and with an
aluminum content of 97% by weight or more, if at least 10% of the
total weight is made up of particles of less than 63 [mu]m,
according to ISO 2591:1988 or national equivalents.
Technical Note: * * *
a.2. Metal powders and alloys where at least 90% of the total
particles by particle volume or weight are made up of particles of
less than 60 [micro]m (determined by measurement techniques such as
using a sieve, laser diffraction or optical scanning), whether
spherical, atomized, spheroidal, flaked or ground, as follows:
* * * * *
a.2.a.2. Beryllium; or
a.2.a.3. Magnesium.
a.2.b Boron or boron alloys with a boron content of 85% or more
by weight.
Technical Note: * * *
* * * * *
Note: In a multimodal particle distribution (e.g., mixtures of
different grain sizes) in which one or more modes are controlled,
the entire powder mixture is controlled.
0
8. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1--Special Materials and Related Equipment, Chemicals,
``Microorganisms'' and ``Toxins,'' Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 1C116 is amended:
0
a. By revising the heading;
0
b. By revising the ``items'' paragraph in the List of Items Controlled
section; and
0
c. By adding a new ``technical note'' to the `items'' paragraph in the
List of Items Controlled section to read as follows:
1C116 Maraging steels having both of the following (see List of
Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Items:
a. Having an ultimate tensile strength, measured at 20[deg]C,
equal to or greater than:
a.1. 0.9 GPa in the solution annealed stage; or
a.2. 1.5 GPa in the precipitation hardened stage; and
b. Any of the following forms:
b.1 Sheet, plate or tubing with a wall or plate thickness equal
to or less than 5.0 mm;
or
b.2 Tubular forms with a wall thickness equal to or less than 50
mm and having an inner diameter equal to or greater than 270 mm.
Technical Note:
Maraging steels are iron alloys that are generally:
a. Characterized by high nickel, very low carbon content and use
substitutional elements or precipitates to produce strengthening and
age-hardening of the alloy; and
b. Subjected to heat treatment cycles to facilitate the
martensitic transformation process (solution annealed stage) and
subsequently age hardened (precipitation hardened stage).
0
9. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 7--Navigation and Avionics, Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) 7E004 is amended:
0
a. By revising the ``MT'' paragraph in the License Requirements
section;
0
b. By adding a License Exception STA paragraph at the end of the
License Exceptions section; and
0
c. By revising the ``related controls'' paragraph in the List of Items
Controlled section, to ready as follows.
7E004 Other ``technology'' as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: * * *
Control(s) Country chart
* * * * *
MT applies to ``technology'' for equipment MT Column 1.
or systems controlled for MT reasons.
* * * * *
License Exceptions
* * * * *
STA: (1) Paragraph (c)(1) of License Exception STA (Sec.
740.20(c)(1) of the EAR) may not be used for 7E004, except for
7E004.a.7. (2) Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception STA (Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR) may not be used for 7E004, except for
7E004.a.7.
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: (1) See 0D521 No. 2 (``source code'' for the
``development'' of fly-by-wire control systems), 0E521 No. 6 (for
``technology'' for the ``development'' of ``software'' controlled by
0D521 No. 2). (2) See also 7E001, 7E002, 7E101, and 7E994. (3) In
addition to the Related Controls in 7E001, 7E002, and 7E101 that
include MT controls, also see the MT controls in 7E104 for design
``technology'' for the integration of the flight control, guidance,
and propulsion data into a flight management system, designed or
modified for rockets or missiles capable of achieving a ``range''
equal to or greater than 300 km, for optimization of rocket system
trajectory; and also see 9E101 for design ``technology'' for
integration of air vehicle fuselage, propulsion system and lifting
control surfaces, designed or modified for unmanned aerial vehicles
capable of achieving a ``range'' equal to or greater than 300 km, to
optimize aerodynamic performance throughout the flight regime of an
unmanned aerial vehicle.
* * * * *
0
10. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 9--Aerospace and Propulsion, Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) 9A101 is amended:
0
a. By revising the ``related definitions'' paragraph in the List of
Items Controlled section; and
0
b. By adding single quotes around the phrase `maximum thrust value' in
``items'' paragraph a.1 in the List of Items Controlled section to read
as follows:
9A101 Turbojet and turbofan engines, other than those controlled by
9A001, as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Definitions: `Maximum thrust value' in 9A101.a.1 is the
manufacturer's demonstrated maximum thrust for the engine type un-
installed. The civil type certified thrust value will be equal to or
less than the manufacturer's demonstrated maximum thrust for the
engine type.
* * * * *
0
11. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 9--Aerospace and Propulsion, Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) 9B105 is amended:
0
a. By revising the heading; and
0
b. By adding a new ``note'' and two new ``technical notes'' to the end
of the `items'' paragraph in the List of Items Controlled section to
read as follows:
9B105 `Aerodynamic test facilities' for speeds of Mach 0.9 or more,
usable for rockets, missiles, or unmanned aerial vehicles capable of
achieving a ``range'' equal to or greater than 300 km and their
subsystems.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
[[Page 42436]]
Items: * * *
Note: 9B105 does not control wind tunnels for speeds of Mach 3
or less with the dimension of the `test cross section size' equal to
or less than 250 mm.
Technical Notes:
1. `Aerodynamic test facilities' includes wind tunnels and shock
tunnels for the study of airflow over objects.
2. `Test cross section size' means the diameter of the circle,
or the side of the square, or the longest side of the rectangle, or
the major axis of the ellipse at the largest `test cross section'
location. `Test cross section' is the section perpendicular to the
flow direction.
0
12. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 9--Aerospace and Propulsion, Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) 9D004 is amended:
0
a. By removing the ``MT'' paragraph in the License Requirements
section; and
0
b. By revising the ``related controls'' paragraph in the List of Items
Controlled section to read as follows:
9D004 Other ``software'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: See also 9D104.
* * * * *
0
13. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 9--Aerospace and Propulsion, Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) 9E101 is amended:
0
a. By revising the heading; and
0
b. By revising the ``related controls'' paragraph in the List of Items
Controlled section to read as follows:
9E101 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for
the ``development,'' ``production,'' or ``use'' of commodities or
software controlled by 9A012 (for MT controlled commodities only),
9A101, 9A103 to 9A111, 9A115 to 9A119, 9C110, 9D101, 9D103, 9D104 or
9D105.
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * * * *
Related Controls: ``Technology'' controlled by 9E101 for items in
9A101.b, 9A103 to 9A111, 9A115 to 9A119, 9D103, and 9D105 is
``subject to the ITAR'' (see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130).
* * * * *
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-16954 Filed 7-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P