Safety Zone; San Diego Bayfair; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA, 42027-42030 [2013-16806]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the market for years before the defects
were detected and recalled.
Petitioners ask the Commission to
issue a mandatory standard to eliminate
the hazard posed by accessible cords in
window coverings. The petition
specifically requests that the
Commission: (1) Promulgate a
mandatory standard that prohibits any
window covering cords when a feasible
cordless alternative exists; and (2)
require that all cords be made
inaccessible through the use of a passive
guardian device when a feasible
cordless alternative does not exist.
By this notice, the Commission seeks
comments concerning this petition.
Interested parties may obtain a copy of
the petition by writing or calling the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission, Room 820,
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. A
copy of the petition also will be made
available for viewing under ‘‘Supporting
and Related Materials’’ in
www.regulations.gov under this docket
number.
Dated: July 3, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–16403 Filed 7–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
29 CFR Part 2520
RIN 1210–AB20
Proposed Amendment To Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for
Pension Benefit Statements
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of Extension of Comment
Period for Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Department of Labor is
extending until August 7, 2013, the
comment period for an advance notice
of proposed rulemaking focusing on
lifetime income illustrations given to
participants in defined contribution
pension plans, such as 401(k) and
403(b) plans. The ANPRM serves as a
request for comments on specific
language and concepts in advance of a
proposed regulation.
DATES: The Department of Labor is
extending the comment period of an
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
advance proposed rule published May
8, 2013, 78 FR 26727. Written comments
must be received by the Department on
or before August 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 1210–AB20, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: e-ORI@dol.gov. Include RIN
1210–AB20 in the subject line of the
message.
Mail: Office of Regulations and
Interpretations, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Room N–5655,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210, Attention: Pension Benefit
Statements Project.
Comments received will be available
for public inspection in the Public
Disclosure Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. They also will
be available online at
www.regulations.gov and www.dol.gov/
ebsa, at no charge. Warning: Do not
include any personally identifiable
information (such as name, address, or
other contact information), or
confidential business information, that
you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments may be posted on the Internet
and can be retrieved by most Internet
search engines.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Suzanne Adelman or Tom Hindmarch at
(202) 693–8500. This is not a toll free
number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 8,
2013, the Department of Labor
(Department) published at 78 FR 26727
an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) regarding the
pension benefit statement requirements
under section 105 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended (ERISA). The ANPRM
requested comments on specific
language and concepts the Department
is considering as part of proposed
regulations currently under
development.
The ANPRM provides that the
Department is considering a rule that
would require a participant’s ‘‘total
benefits accrued’’ to be expressed on his
pension benefit statement as an
estimated lifetime stream of payments,
in addition to being presented as an
account balance. The ANPRM also
states that the Department is
considering a rule that would require a
participant’s account balance to be
projected to his retirement date and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42027
then converted to and expressed as an
estimated lifetime stream of payments.
The comment period for the ANPRM
is scheduled to close on July 8, 2013. A
substantial number of stakeholders are
concerned that the original 60-day
comment period is not sufficient to
provide well thought out and useful
feedback to the Department on the
complex matters raised in the ANPRM.
Accordingly, to ensure that all
interested persons have the opportunity
to prepare and submit comments, EBSA
extends the comment period from July
8 to August 7, 2013.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
July, 2013.
Phyllis C. Borzi,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits
Security Administration, Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013–16739 Filed 7–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0476]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; San Diego Bayfair;
Mission Bay, San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Mission Bay in San
Diego, CA for the San Diego Bayfair
power boat races from September 13,
2013, until September 15, 2013. The
safety zone as proposed would be in
effect from 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. daily
during this timeframe. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to provide for
the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and
other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 14, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number using any
one of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
42028
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant John Bannon,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619)
278–7261, email
John.E.Bannon@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0476] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing comments and documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0476) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. Basis and Purpose
The San Diego Bayfair power boat
races occur annually over a weekend in
September after the Labor Day weekend.
This temporary safety zone
encompassing a portion of Mission Bay
is necessary to provide for the safety of
the participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative. As an
annual event, permitted by the City of
San Diego, it is well advertised,
supported by the community, and
includes numerous safety support boats.
The Ports and Waterways Safety Act
(33 U.S.C. sections 1221 et seq.)
authorizes the Coast Guard to establish
safety zones. Thunderboats Unlimited
Inc. is sponsoring San Diego Bayfair,
which is held on the navigable waters
of Mission Bay in San Diego, CA. The
proposed temporary safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and other vessels and users of
the waterway. This event involves
approximately 200 various power boats
racing on a predetermined course. The
sponsor will provide thirty seven patrol
and rescue vessels to help facilitate the
event and ensure public safety.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing a
temporary safety zone that would be
enforced from 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. from
September 13, 2013, through September
15, 2013. This safety zone is necessary
to provide for the safety of the crews,
spectators, participants, and other
vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels would be
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or his designated
representative. The limits of the safety
zone will be the navigable waters of
Mission Bay bound by the following
coordinates; 32°47′32″ N, 117°13′25″ W
to 32°47′32″ N, 117°13′00″ W to
32°47′20″ N, 117°13′00″ W then west to
32°46′45″ N, 117°14′09″ W to 32°46′11″
N, 117°14′01″ W. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
42029
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. This determination is based on
the size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be
hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will be allowed to
transit through the designated safety
zone during specified times, but can
transit safely around the safety zone.
Additionally, before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a
Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: Owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in this
portion of Mission Bay from September
13–15, 2013, from 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Vessel traffic can
pass safely around the zone, and may
transit through the safety zone if they
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or his designated
representative. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will issue
broadcast notice to mariners alerts via
marine channel 16 VHF.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
5. Federalism
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
42030
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 135 / Monday, July 15, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves establishing a temporary
safety zone. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(1) Entry into, transit through or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port of San Diego or his
designated representative.
(2) Mariners can request permission to
transit through the safety zone from the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander can be contacted on VHF–
FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: June 27, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013–16806 Filed 7–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–578 to read as
follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will be the navigable waters of
Mission Bay bound by the following
coordinates; 32°47′32″ N, 117°13′25″ W
to 32°47′32″ N, 117°13′00″ W to
32°47′20″ N, 117°13′00″ W then west to
32°46′45″ N, 117°14′09″ W to 32°46′11″
N, 117°14′01″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
on September 13, 14, and 15, 2013.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will publish a Local Notice to
Mariners (LNM). If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and
local, state, and federal law enforcement
vessels who have been authorized to act
on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations.
17:36 Jul 12, 2013
Jkt 229001
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 207
Reservoirs at Headwaters of the
Mississippi River; Use and
Administration
§ 165.T11–578 Safety zone; San Diego
Bayfair; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for comments.
ACTION:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers is proposing to amend the
rules regarding use and administration
of the reservoirs at the headwaters of the
Mississippi River by deleting from the
Code of Federal Regulations all
references to minimum discharges and
to operating limits for the reservoirs.
Following extensive public input and
environmental review, the St. Paul
District of the Corps of Engineers
recently adopted an updated operating
plan for the Mississippi River
Headwaters reservoirs containing
minimum flow values that differ from
those currently codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations. Deleting all
references to minimum flows in the
regulations will eliminate the current
discrepancy between the regulations
and the approved operating plan for the
reservoirs. The operating limits are also
contained in the operating plan for the
reservoirs, and eliminating both the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
minimum flow values and the operating
limits from the rule will make it
unnecessary to amend the regulations
each time the values are modified in the
operating plan in the future.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
September 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number COE–
2013–0008, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: Jerry.W.Webb@usace.army.mil
and Chandra.S.Pathak@usace.army.mil.
Include the docket number, COE–2013–
0008 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Attn: CECW–CE (Chandra S. Pathak),
441 G Street NW., Washington, DC
20314–1000.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Due to
security requirements, we cannot
receive comments by hand delivery or
courier.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket number COE–2013–0008. All
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the commenter indicates that the
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit information that you
consider to be CBI, or otherwise
protected, through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov Web site is
an anonymous access system, which
means we will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email directly to the
Corps without going through
regulations.gov, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the comment that is placed in
the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, we recommend that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If we cannot read your
comment because of technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, we may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic
comments should avoid the use of any
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
E:\FR\FM\15JYP1.SGM
15JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 135 (Monday, July 15, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42027-42030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16806]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0476]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; San Diego Bayfair; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Mission Bay in San Diego, CA for the San Diego
Bayfair power boat races from September 13, 2013, until September 15,
2013. The safety zone as proposed would be in effect from 7 a.m. to
5:30 p.m. daily during this timeframe. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 14, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
[[Page 42028]]
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant John Bannon, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego; telephone (619) 278-7261, email
John.E.Bannon@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0476] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing comments and documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0476) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The San Diego Bayfair power boat races occur annually over a
weekend in September after the Labor Day weekend. This temporary safety
zone encompassing a portion of Mission Bay is necessary to provide for
the safety of the participants, crew, spectators, participating
vessels, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels would be prohibited from entering into, transiting through or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port or his designated representative. As an annual event,
permitted by the City of San Diego, it is well advertised, supported by
the community, and includes numerous safety support boats.
The Ports and Waterways Safety Act (33 U.S.C. sections 1221 et
seq.) authorizes the Coast Guard to establish safety zones.
Thunderboats Unlimited Inc. is sponsoring San Diego Bayfair, which is
held on the navigable waters of Mission Bay in San Diego, CA. The
proposed temporary safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety
of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other
vessels and users of the waterway. This event involves approximately
200 various power boats racing on a predetermined course. The sponsor
will provide thirty seven patrol and rescue vessels to help facilitate
the event and ensure public safety.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing a temporary safety zone that would be
enforced from 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. from September 13, 2013, through
September 15, 2013. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the crews, spectators, participants, and other vessels and
users of the waterway. Persons and vessels would be prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative. The limits of the safety zone will be the navigable
waters of Mission Bay bound by the following coordinates;
32[deg]47[min]32[sec] N, 117[deg]13[min]25[sec] W to
32[deg]47[min]32[sec] N, 117[deg]13[min]00[sec] W to
32[deg]47[min]20[sec] N, 117[deg]13[min]00[sec] W then west to
32[deg]46[min]45[sec] N, 117[deg]14[min]09[sec] W to
32[deg]46[min]11[sec] N, 117[deg]14[min]01[sec] W. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses
[[Page 42029]]
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This determination is
based on the size and location of the safety zone. Commercial vessels
will not be hindered by the safety zone. Recreational vessels will be
allowed to transit through the designated safety zone during specified
times, but can transit safely around the safety zone. Additionally,
before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish a Local
Notice to Mariners (LNM).
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule will affect the
following entities, some of which may be small entities: Owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in this portion of
Mission Bay from September 13-15, 2013, from 7 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic can pass safely around the zone, and may transit through the
safety zone if they obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative. Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will issue broadcast notice to mariners alerts via marine channel
16 VHF.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on
[[Page 42030]]
the human environment. This proposed rule involves establishing a
temporary safety zone. This rule is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-578 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-578 Safety zone; San Diego Bayfair; Mission Bay, San
Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will be the navigable
waters of Mission Bay bound by the following coordinates;
32[deg]47[min]32[sec] N, 117[deg]13[min]25[sec] W to
32[deg]47[min]32[sec] N, 117[deg]13[min]00[sec] W to
32[deg]47[min]20[sec] N, 117[deg]13[min]00[sec] W then west to
32[deg]46[min]45[sec] N, 117[deg]14[min]09[sec] W to
32[deg]46[min]11[sec] N, 117[deg]14[min]01[sec] W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
to 5:30 p.m. on September 13, 14, and 15, 2013. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
If the event concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the
Captain of the Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations.
(1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port of San
Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Mariners can request permission to transit through the safety
zone from the Patrol Commander. The Patrol Commander can be contacted
on VHF-FM channels 16 and 23.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: June 27, 2013.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2013-16806 Filed 7-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P