Pipeline Safety: Potential for Damage to Pipeline Facilities Caused by Flooding, 41991-41993 [2013-16754]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–16676 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2013–0051]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated May 6,
2013, the Erie Lackawanna Dining Car
Preservation Society (ELDCPS) has
petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of
the Federal railroad safety regulations
contained at 49 CFR section 223.15,
Requirements for existing passenger
cars. FRA assigned the petition Docket
Number FRA–2013–0051.
This petition relates to the operation
of a sleeping car, ‘‘The City of Lima,’’
Reporting Mark RPCX 211. The
petitioner is requesting permission to
continue to operate the car that does not
have window glazing meeting the
requirements of 49 CFR 223.15. This car
is interchanged with railroads operating
on the general system, moved short
distances over freight railroads for
storage when not in use, and operated
behind Amtrak passenger trains or in
special trains made up of similar
passenger cars. ELDCPS is a not-forprofit corporation, incorporated in the
State of New Jersey since 2001.
The private passenger car fleet is a
small fraction of the total passenger fleet
operating in the country, and continues
to have an excellent safety record, due
in part to the operating characteristics
and the operating environment of the
cars. Operation of this private passenger
car has been injury-free as related to
window glazing for the past 20 years,
and the car has operated in the service
described in this petition since 2008.
Specifically, Car RPCX 211 was built
by Pullman Standard in February 1950
and is equipped with 20 Adams &
Westlake #64 sash, double-glazed, 30″ ×
42″ side windows with a mixture of
unmarked polycarbonate and
automotive-type, windshield-grade,
laminated safety glass. FRA Type II
polycarbonate glazing is present in the
vestibule’s Dutch doors, but is badly
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
hazed. Carbody end-door windows are
unmarked polycarbonate.
ELDCPS seeks relief from the glazing
requirements for operation of this
passenger car for short distances over
freight lines, behind Amtrak passenger
trains, or in special trains made up of
similar passenger cars. Typically, these
cars are operated over scenic, longdistance routes through rural
countryside, which are low-risk areas
for window damage or breakage. The car
is operated at a maximum track speed,
as authorized by the railroad that is
controlling the movement.
Since ELDCPS purchased RPCX 211,
in 2007, FRA has not received any
reports of personal injuries involving
the operation of this equipment as the
result of the presently installed
noncompliant glazing. There have not
been any acts of vandalism to this car
while in storage or in operation. When
not in use, this equipment is stored at
a private siding on the DelawareLackawanna Railroad in Scranton, PA.
ELDCPS has a current and feasible
emergency egress plan for this car. The
plan includes four, clearly marked
emergency exit windows, emergency
battery lights throughout the car, and
standard emergency tools in a wellmarked cabinet near Bedroom A in the
hallway.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE., W12–140, Washington,
DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41991
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by August
26, 2013 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). See https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov
or interested parties may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Regulatory and Legislative Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–16677 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0136]
Pipeline Safety: Potential for Damage
to Pipeline Facilities Caused by
Flooding
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA); DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory
Bulletin.
AGENCY:
PHMSA is issuing this
advisory bulletin to all owners and
operators of gas and hazardous liquid
pipelines to communicate the potential
for damage to pipeline facilities caused
by severe flooding. This advisory
includes actions that operators should
consider taking to ensure the integrity of
pipelines in case of flooding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Operators of pipelines subject to
regulation by PHMSA should contact
the appropriate PHMSA Regional Office.
The PHMSA Regional Offices and their
contact information are as follows:
• Central Region: 816–329–3800
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
41992
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
South Dakota, and Wisconsin
• Eastern Region: 609–989–2171
Connecticut, Delaware, District of
Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
Vermont, Virginia, and West
Virginia
• Southern Region: 404–832–1147
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Mississippi, North Carolina, Puerto
Rico, South Carolina, and
Tennessee
• Southwest Region: 713–272–2859
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas
• Western Region: 720–963–3160
Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado,
Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada,
Oregon, Utah, Washington, and
Wyoming
Intrastate pipeline operators should
contact the appropriate state pipeline
safety authority. A list of state pipeline
safety authorities is provided at:
www.napsr.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
Section 192.613(a) of the Pipeline
Safety Regulations (49 CFR Parts 190–
199) states that ‘‘[e]ach operator shall
have a procedure for continuing
surveillance of its facilities to determine
and take appropriate action concerning
changes in class location, failures,
leakage history, corrosion, substantial
changes in cathodic protection
requirements, and other unusual
operating and maintenance conditions.’’
Section 192.613(b) further states that
‘‘[i]f a segment of pipeline is determined
to be in unsatisfactory condition but no
immediate hazard exists, the operator
shall initiate a program to recondition or
phase out the segment involved, or, if
the segment cannot be reconditioned or
phased out, reduce the maximum
allowable operating pressure in
accordance with § 192.619(a) and (b).’’
Likewise, § 195.401(b)(1) of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations states that
‘‘[w]henever an operator discovers any
condition that could adversely affect the
safe operation of its pipeline system, it
must correct the condition within a
reasonable time. However, if the
condition is of such a nature that it
presents an immediate hazard to
persons or property, the operator may
not operate the affected part of the
system until it has corrected the unsafe
condition.’’ Section 195.401(b)(2)
further states that ‘‘[w]hen an operator
discovers a condition on a pipeline
covered under [the integrity
management requirements in] § 195.452,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
the operator must correct the condition
as prescribed in § 195.452(h).’’ Severe
flooding is the kind of unusual
operating condition that can adversely
affect the safe operation of a pipeline
and require corrective action under
§§ 192.613(a) and 195.401(b).
PHMSA has released five Advisory
Bulletins on this subject with the
earliest issued July 29, 1993 (ADB–93–
03), and the most recent Advisory
Bulletin (ADB–11–04) on July 27, 2011,
76 FR 44985, each of which followed an
event that involved severe flooding that
affected pipelines in the areas of rising
waters. Three of the more notable events
are briefly described below:
On August 13, 2011, Enterprise
Products Operating, LLC discovered a
release of 28,350 gallons (675 barrels) of
natural gasoline into the Missouri River
in Iowa. The rupture, according to the
metallurgical report, was the result of
fatigue crack growth driven by
vibrations in the pipe from vortex
shedding.
On July 1, 2011, ExxonMobil Pipeline
Company experienced a pipeline failure
near Laurel, Montana, resulting in the
release of 63,000 gallons of crude oil
into the Yellowstone River. The rupture
was caused by debris washing
downstream in the river damaging the
exposed pipeline.
On July 15, 2011, NuStar Pipeline
Operating Partnership, L.P. reported a
100-barrel anhydrous ammonia spill in
the Missouri River in Nebraska. The 6inch-diameter pipeline was exposed by
scouring during extreme flooding.
As shown in these previous events,
damage to a pipeline may occur as a
result of additional stresses imposed on
piping by undermining of the support
structure and by impact and/or
waterborne forces. Washouts and
erosion may result in loss of support for
both buried and exposed pipelines. The
flow of water against an exposed
pipeline may also result in forces
sufficient to cause a failure. These forces
are increased by the accumulation of
debris against the pipeline. Reduction of
cover over pipelines in farmland may
also result in the pipeline being struck
by equipment used in farming or cleanup operations.
Additionally, the safety of valves,
regulators, relief sets, and other facilities
normally above ground or above water
is jeopardized when covered by water.
This threat is posed not only by
operational factors, but also by the
possibility of damage by outside forces,
floating debris, current, and craft
operating on the water. Boaters involved
in rescue operations, emergency support
functions, sightseeing, and other
activities are generally not aware of the
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
seriousness of an incident that could
result from their craft damaging a
pipeline facility that is unseen beneath
the surface of the water. Depending on
the size of the craft and the pipeline
facility struck, significant pipeline
damage may result.
Though these accidents account for
less than one percent of the total
number of pipeline accidents, the
consequences of a release in water can
be much more severe because of the
threats to drinking water supplies and
potential environmental damage.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB–2013–02)
To: Owners and Operators of Gas and
Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Systems.
Subject: Potential for Damage to
Pipeline Facilities Caused by Severe
Flooding.
Advisory: Severe flooding can
adversely affect the safe operation of a
pipeline. Operators need to direct their
resources in a manner that will enable
them to determine the potential effects
of flooding on their pipeline systems.
Operators are urged to take the
following actions to prevent and
mitigate damage to pipeline facilities
and ensure public and environmental
safety in areas affected by flooding:
1. Evaluate the accessibility of
pipeline facilities that may be in
jeopardy, such as valve settings, which
are needed to isolate water crossings or
other sections of a pipeline.
2. Extend regulator vents and relief
stacks above the level of anticipated
flooding, as appropriate.
3. Coordinate with emergency and
spill responders on pipeline location
and condition. Provide maps and other
relevant information to such responders.
4. Coordinate with other pipeline
operators in the flood area and establish
emergency response centers to act as a
liaison for pipeline problems and
solutions.
5. Deploy personnel so that they will
be in position to take emergency
actions, such as shut down, isolation, or
containment.
6. Determine if facilities that are
normally above ground (e.g., valves,
regulators, relief sets, etc.) have become
submerged and are in danger of being
struck by vessels or debris and, if
possible, mark such facilities with an
appropriate buoy and Coast Guard
approval.
7. Perform frequent patrols, including
appropriate overflights, to evaluate
right-of-way conditions at water
crossings during flooding and after
waters subside. Determine if flooding
has exposed or undermined pipelines as
a result of new river channels cut by the
flooding or by erosion or scouring.
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 134 / Friday, July 12, 2013 / Notices
8. Perform surveys to determine the
depth of cover over pipelines and the
condition of any exposed pipelines,
such as those crossing scour holes.
Where appropriate, surveys of
underwater pipe should include the use
of visual inspection by divers or
instrumented detection. Information
gathered by these surveys should be
shared with affected landowners.
Agricultural agencies may help to
inform farmers of the potential hazard
from reduced cover over pipelines.
9. Ensure that line markers are still in
place or replaced in a timely manner.
Notify contractors, highway
departments, and others involved in
post-flood restoration activities of the
presence of pipelines and the risks
posed by reduced cover.
If a pipeline has suffered damage, is
shut-in, or is being operated at a
reduced pressure as a precautionary
measure due to flooding, the operator
should advise the appropriate PHMSA
regional office or state pipeline safety
authority before returning the line to
service, increasing its operating
pressure, or otherwise changing its
operating status. Furthermore, reporting
a Safety Related Condition as prescribed
in §§ 191.23 and 195.55 may also be
required.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 8, 2013.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2013–16754 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35726]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Transport Handling Specialists, Inc.—
Continuance in Control Exemption—
RSL Railroad, LLC
Transport Handling Specialists, Inc.
(THS), has filed a verified notice of
exemption (Notice) under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(2) to continue in control of
RSL Railroad, LLC (RSL), upon RSL’s
becoming a Class III rail carrier. By
decision served May 15, 2013, the Board
held the publication and effectiveness of
the Notice in abeyance pending record
supplementation and further Board
action. THS supplemented the record on
June 3, 2013, and June 17, 2013. The
abeyance in this proceeding will be
lifted upon service of this Notice.
This transaction is related to a
verified notice of exemption filed in
RSL Railroad LLC—Operation
Exemption—Massillon Energy &
Technology Park, Docket No. FD 35672,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:46 Jul 11, 2013
Jkt 229001
wherein RSL is seeking Board authority
to operate an approximately 1.27-mile
line in Massillon, Stark County, Ohio.
The transaction may be consummated
on or after July 26, 2013 (the effective
date of this exemption).
THS states that it has a 50%
ownership interest in RSL, with the
remaining interest equally split among
three other individuals.1 THS states that
it also owns 100% of Big Spring Rail
System, Inc., a Class III rail carrier that
operates in Big Spring, Texas.2
THS certifies that: (1) The rail line to
be operated by RSL does not connect
with any other railroads in the THS
corporate family; (2) the continuance in
control is not part of a series of
anticipated transactions that would
connect the rail line to be operated by
RSL with any other railroad in the THS
corporate family; and (3) the transaction
does not involve a Class I rail carrier.
Therefore, the transaction is exempt
from the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under 11324 and 11325
that involve only Class III rail carriers.
Accordingly, the Board may not impose
labor protective conditions here because
all of the carriers involved are Class III
carriers.
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Stay petitions must be
filed no later than July 19, 2013 (at least
7 days before the exemption becomes
effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35726, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, one copy of each pleading
must be served on Baxter Wellmon,
1554 Paoli Pike #179, West Chester, PA
19380.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at
‘‘www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: July 9, 2013.
1 Notice
3 (Apr. 29, 2013); Notice, Ex. 3, Schedule
A.
PO 00000
2 Supplement
Frm 00086
2 (June 17, 2013).
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41993
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Raina S. White,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2013–16741 Filed 7–11–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. FD 35729]
Ann Arbor Railroad, Inc.—Lease
Exemption—Norfolk Southern Railway
Company
Under 49 CFR 1011.7(a)(2)(x)(A), the
Director of the Office of Proceedings
(Director) is delegated the authority to
determine whether to issue notices of
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for
lease and operation transactions under
49 U.S.C. 10902. However, the Board
reserves to itself the consideration and
disposition of all matters involving
issues of general transportation
importance. 49 CFR 1011.2(a)(6).
Accordingly, the Board revokes the
delegation to the Director with respect
to issuance of the notice of exemption
for lease and operation of the rail line
at issue in this case. The Board
determines that this notice of exemption
should be issued, and does so here.
Notice
Ann Arbor Railroad, Inc. (AARR), a
Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified
notice of exemption under 49 CFR
1150.41 to lease from Norfolk Southern
Railway Company (NSR) two rail lines
totaling 3.69 miles: (1) A line of railroad
between milepost CS 1.26 and milepost
CS 2.65 in Toledo, Ohio; and (2) a line
of railroad between milepost GY 85.40
and GY 87.70 in Toledo (the Lines).
According to AARR, it has entered into
a Lease Agreement (Agreement) with
NSR whereby AARR will lease the Lines
from NSR. The term of the lease is 10
years.
Pursuant to 49 CFR 1150.43(h), AARR
has disclosed that the Agreement
contains an interchange commitment in
the form of lease credits, depending on
the number of carloads interchanged
with NSR in a given year.1 AARR states
that the interchange commitment will
enable it to ‘‘invest in improvements on
the lines and increase traffic levels.’’ 2
1 AARR has filed under seal, pursuant to 49 CFR
1150.43(h)(1)(ii), a confidential, complete version of
the Agreement. On July 1, 2013, the Brotherhood of
Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen filed a motion
for access to the Agreement. That motion will be
addressed in a separate decision.
2 Notice 4.
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41991-41993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16754]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-2013-0136]
Pipeline Safety: Potential for Damage to Pipeline Facilities
Caused by Flooding
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: PHMSA is issuing this advisory bulletin to all owners and
operators of gas and hazardous liquid pipelines to communicate the
potential for damage to pipeline facilities caused by severe flooding.
This advisory includes actions that operators should consider taking to
ensure the integrity of pipelines in case of flooding.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Operators of pipelines subject to
regulation by PHMSA should contact the appropriate PHMSA Regional
Office. The PHMSA Regional Offices and their contact information are as
follows:
Central Region: 816-329-3800
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio,
[[Page 41992]]
South Dakota, and Wisconsin
Eastern Region: 609-989-2171
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia
Southern Region: 404-832-1147
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina,
Puerto Rico, South Carolina, and Tennessee
Southwest Region: 713-272-2859
Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas
Western Region: 720-963-3160
Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana,
Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming
Intrastate pipeline operators should contact the appropriate state
pipeline safety authority. A list of state pipeline safety authorities
is provided at: www.napsr.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 192.613(a) of the Pipeline Safety Regulations (49 CFR Parts
190-199) states that ``[e]ach operator shall have a procedure for
continuing surveillance of its facilities to determine and take
appropriate action concerning changes in class location, failures,
leakage history, corrosion, substantial changes in cathodic protection
requirements, and other unusual operating and maintenance conditions.''
Section 192.613(b) further states that ``[i]f a segment of pipeline is
determined to be in unsatisfactory condition but no immediate hazard
exists, the operator shall initiate a program to recondition or phase
out the segment involved, or, if the segment cannot be reconditioned or
phased out, reduce the maximum allowable operating pressure in
accordance with Sec. 192.619(a) and (b).''
Likewise, Sec. 195.401(b)(1) of the Pipeline Safety Regulations
states that ``[w]henever an operator discovers any condition that could
adversely affect the safe operation of its pipeline system, it must
correct the condition within a reasonable time. However, if the
condition is of such a nature that it presents an immediate hazard to
persons or property, the operator may not operate the affected part of
the system until it has corrected the unsafe condition.'' Section
195.401(b)(2) further states that ``[w]hen an operator discovers a
condition on a pipeline covered under [the integrity management
requirements in] Sec. 195.452, the operator must correct the condition
as prescribed in Sec. 195.452(h).'' Severe flooding is the kind of
unusual operating condition that can adversely affect the safe
operation of a pipeline and require corrective action under Sec. Sec.
192.613(a) and 195.401(b).
PHMSA has released five Advisory Bulletins on this subject with the
earliest issued July 29, 1993 (ADB-93-03), and the most recent Advisory
Bulletin (ADB-11-04) on July 27, 2011, 76 FR 44985, each of which
followed an event that involved severe flooding that affected pipelines
in the areas of rising waters. Three of the more notable events are
briefly described below:
On August 13, 2011, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC discovered a
release of 28,350 gallons (675 barrels) of natural gasoline into the
Missouri River in Iowa. The rupture, according to the metallurgical
report, was the result of fatigue crack growth driven by vibrations in
the pipe from vortex shedding.
On July 1, 2011, ExxonMobil Pipeline Company experienced a pipeline
failure near Laurel, Montana, resulting in the release of 63,000
gallons of crude oil into the Yellowstone River. The rupture was caused
by debris washing downstream in the river damaging the exposed
pipeline.
On July 15, 2011, NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership, L.P.
reported a 100-barrel anhydrous ammonia spill in the Missouri River in
Nebraska. The 6-inch-diameter pipeline was exposed by scouring during
extreme flooding.
As shown in these previous events, damage to a pipeline may occur
as a result of additional stresses imposed on piping by undermining of
the support structure and by impact and/or waterborne forces. Washouts
and erosion may result in loss of support for both buried and exposed
pipelines. The flow of water against an exposed pipeline may also
result in forces sufficient to cause a failure. These forces are
increased by the accumulation of debris against the pipeline. Reduction
of cover over pipelines in farmland may also result in the pipeline
being struck by equipment used in farming or clean-up operations.
Additionally, the safety of valves, regulators, relief sets, and
other facilities normally above ground or above water is jeopardized
when covered by water. This threat is posed not only by operational
factors, but also by the possibility of damage by outside forces,
floating debris, current, and craft operating on the water. Boaters
involved in rescue operations, emergency support functions,
sightseeing, and other activities are generally not aware of the
seriousness of an incident that could result from their craft damaging
a pipeline facility that is unseen beneath the surface of the water.
Depending on the size of the craft and the pipeline facility struck,
significant pipeline damage may result.
Though these accidents account for less than one percent of the
total number of pipeline accidents, the consequences of a release in
water can be much more severe because of the threats to drinking water
supplies and potential environmental damage.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB-2013-02)
To: Owners and Operators of Gas and Hazardous Liquid Pipeline
Systems.
Subject: Potential for Damage to Pipeline Facilities Caused by
Severe Flooding.
Advisory: Severe flooding can adversely affect the safe operation
of a pipeline. Operators need to direct their resources in a manner
that will enable them to determine the potential effects of flooding on
their pipeline systems. Operators are urged to take the following
actions to prevent and mitigate damage to pipeline facilities and
ensure public and environmental safety in areas affected by flooding:
1. Evaluate the accessibility of pipeline facilities that may be in
jeopardy, such as valve settings, which are needed to isolate water
crossings or other sections of a pipeline.
2. Extend regulator vents and relief stacks above the level of
anticipated flooding, as appropriate.
3. Coordinate with emergency and spill responders on pipeline
location and condition. Provide maps and other relevant information to
such responders.
4. Coordinate with other pipeline operators in the flood area and
establish emergency response centers to act as a liaison for pipeline
problems and solutions.
5. Deploy personnel so that they will be in position to take
emergency actions, such as shut down, isolation, or containment.
6. Determine if facilities that are normally above ground (e.g.,
valves, regulators, relief sets, etc.) have become submerged and are in
danger of being struck by vessels or debris and, if possible, mark such
facilities with an appropriate buoy and Coast Guard approval.
7. Perform frequent patrols, including appropriate overflights, to
evaluate right-of-way conditions at water crossings during flooding and
after waters subside. Determine if flooding has exposed or undermined
pipelines as a result of new river channels cut by the flooding or by
erosion or scouring.
[[Page 41993]]
8. Perform surveys to determine the depth of cover over pipelines
and the condition of any exposed pipelines, such as those crossing
scour holes. Where appropriate, surveys of underwater pipe should
include the use of visual inspection by divers or instrumented
detection. Information gathered by these surveys should be shared with
affected landowners. Agricultural agencies may help to inform farmers
of the potential hazard from reduced cover over pipelines.
9. Ensure that line markers are still in place or replaced in a
timely manner. Notify contractors, highway departments, and others
involved in post-flood restoration activities of the presence of
pipelines and the risks posed by reduced cover.
If a pipeline has suffered damage, is shut-in, or is being operated
at a reduced pressure as a precautionary measure due to flooding, the
operator should advise the appropriate PHMSA regional office or state
pipeline safety authority before returning the line to service,
increasing its operating pressure, or otherwise changing its operating
status. Furthermore, reporting a Safety Related Condition as prescribed
in Sec. Sec. 191.23 and 195.55 may also be required.
Issued in Washington, DC on July 8, 2013.
Jeffrey D. Wiese,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2013-16754 Filed 7-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P