Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Redesignation of the Indiana Portion of the Louisville Area to Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter, 41735-41752 [2013-16659]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this
proposed rule, if finalized, will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. This proposed rule
does not change any applicable
emission limit for FCPP. This proposed
rule merely extends a notification date
by six months.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 49
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Indians,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
Dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, Title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 49—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 49
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. In § 49.5512, revise paragraph (i)(4)
to read as follows:
■
§ 49.5512 Federal Implementation Plan
Provisions for Four Corners Power Plant,
Navajo Nation.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(4) By January 1, 2013, the owner or
operator shall submit a letter to the
Regional Administrator updating EPA of
the status of lease negotiations and
regulatory approvals required to comply
with paragraph (i)(3) of this section. By
December 31, 2013, the owner or
operator shall notify the Regional
Administrator by letter whether it will
comply with paragraph (i)(2) of this
section or whether it will comply with
paragraph (i)(3) of this section and shall
submit a plan and time table for
compliance with either paragraph (i)(2)
or (3) of this section. The owner or
operator shall amend and submit this
amended plan to the Regional
Administrator as changes occur.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–16078 Filed 7–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
41735
OAR–2011–0698, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
[EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0698; FRL–9831–8]
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
Approval and Promulgation of Air
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Redesignation of the Indiana Portion of Control Strategies Section (AR–18J),
the Louisville Area to Attainment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
1997 Annual Standard for Fine
Illinois 60604.
Particulate Matter
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Chief, Control Strategies Section (AR–
Agency (EPA).
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
ACTION: Proposed rule.
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
SUMMARY: On June 16, 2011, the Indiana
are only accepted during the Regional
Department of Environmental
Office normal hours of operation, and
Management (IDEM) submitted a
special arrangements should be made
request for EPA to approve the
for deliveries of boxed information. The
redesignation of the Indiana portion of
Regional Office official hours of
the Louisville (KY–IN) (Madison
business are Monday through Friday,
Township, Jefferson County and Clark
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
and Floyd Counties) nonattainment area holidays.
to attainment of the 1997 annual
Instructions: Direct your comments to
standard for fine particulate matter
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2011–
(PM2.5). EPA is proposing to determine
0698. EPA’s policy is that all comments
that the entire Louisville area has
received will be included in the public
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
docket without change and may be
standard, based on the most recent three made available online at
years of certified air quality data. EPA
www.regulations.gov, including any
is proposing to approve, as revisions to
personal information provided, unless
the Indiana state implementation plan
the comment includes information
(SIP), the state’s plan for maintaining
claimed to be Confidential Business
the 1997 annual PM2.5 National Ambient Information (CBI) or other information
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS or
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
standard) through 2025 in the area. EPA Do not submit information that you
is proposing to approve the 2008
consider to be CBI or otherwise
emissions inventory for the Indiana
protected through www.regulations.gov
portion of the Louisville area as meeting or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
the comprehensive emissions inventory site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA
which means EPA will not know your
or Act). Indiana’s maintenance plan
identity or contact information unless
submission includes motor vehicle
you provide it in the body of your
emission budgets (MVEBs) for the
comment. If you send an email
mobile source contribution of PM2.5 and comment directly to EPA without going
nitrogen oxides (NOX) in the Louisville
through www.regulations.gov, your
area for transportation conformity
email address will be automatically
purposes; EPA is proposing to approve
captured and included as part of the
the MVEBs for 2015 and 2025 into the
comment that is placed in the public
Indiana SIP for transportation
docket and made available on the
conformity purposes. In this proposal,
Internet. If you submit an electronic
EPA is also proposing to approve a
comment, EPA recommends that you
supplement to the emission inventories
include your name and other contact
previously submitted by the state. EPA
information in the body of your
is proposing that the inventories for
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
ammonia and volatile organic
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
compounds (VOC), in conjunction with
comment due to technical difficulties
the inventories for NOX, direct PM2.5,
and cannot contact you for clarification,
and sulfur dioxide (SO2) that EPA
EPA may not be able to consider your
previously proposed to approve, meet
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the comprehensive emissions inventory the use of special characters, any form
requirement of the CAA.
of encryption, and be free of any defects
DATES: Comments must be received on
or viruses. For additional instructions
or before August 12, 2013.
on submitting comments, go to section
I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
section of this document.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41736
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Carolyn
Persoon, Environmental Engineer, at
(312) 353–8290 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8290,
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
supplementary information section is
arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for EPA?
II. What actions is EPA proposing to take?
III. What is the background for these actions?
IV. What are the criteria for redesignation to
attainment?
V. What is EPA’s analysis of the State’s
request?
1. Attainment (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i))
2. The Area Has Met All Applicable
Requirements under Section 110 and
Part D and Has a Fully Approved SIP
Under Section 110(k) (Sections
107(d)(3)(E)(v) and 107(d)(3)(E)(ii))
3. The Improvement in Air Quality Is Due
to Permanent and Enforceable
Reductions in Emissions Resulting from
Implementation of the SIP and
Applicable Federal Air Pollution Control
Regulations and Other Permanent and
Enforceable Reductions (Section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii))
4. Indiana Has a Fully Approved
Maintenance Plan Pursuant to Section
175A of the CAA (Section
107(d)(3)(E)(iv))
5. Adequacy of Indiana’s MVEB
6. 2008 Comprehensive Emissions
Inventory
7. Summary of Proposed Actions
VI. What are the effects of EPA’s proposed
actions?
VII. Statutory and Executive order reviews.
I. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
When submitting comments,
remember to:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions—EPA may ask
you to respond to specific questions or
organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. What actions is EPA proposing to
take?
EPA is proposing to take several
actions related to redesignation of the
Indiana portion of the Louisville area to
attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS. In addition to EPA’s March 9,
2011, determination that the area
attained the 1997 annual NAAQS for
PM2.5 by the applicable attainment date
based on quality-assured, certified
2007–2009 ambient air monitoring data
(76 FR 12860), we are proposing to
determine that the area continues to
attain the NAAQS for PM2.5, based
monitoring data for 2009–2011 and
2010–2012 shows that the area
continues to attain. EPA is proposing to
find that Indiana meets the
requirements for redesignation of the
Louisville area to attainment of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS under section
107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.
Second, EPA is proposing to approve
Indiana’s annual PM2.5 maintenance
plan for the Louisville area as a revision
to the Indiana SIP, including the MVEBs
for PM2.5 and NOX emissions for the
mobile source contribution of the
Louisville area.
Finally, EPA is proposing to approve
2008 primary PM2.5, NOX, SO2, VOC,
and ammonia emissions inventories as
satisfying the requirement in section
172(c)(3) of the CAA for a current,
accurate and comprehensive emission
inventory. In a supplemental
submission to EPA on March 18, 2013,
IDEM submitted ammonia and VOC
emissions inventories to supplement the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
emissions inventories that had
previously been submitted.
In this proposed redesignation, EPA
takes into account two decisions of the
D.C. Circuit Court (referred to as ‘‘the
D.C. Circuit’’ or ‘‘the Court’’). In the first
of the two court decisions, the D.C.
Circuit, on August 21, 2012, issued EME
Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 696
F.3d 7 (D.C. Cir. 2012, no. 11–1302 and
consolidated cases) (referred to as ‘‘EME
Homer City,’’) which vacated and
remanded the Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule (CSAPR) and ordered EPA to
continue administering the Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) ‘‘pending . . .
development of a valid replacement.’’
EME Homer City at 38. The D.C. Circuit
denied all petitions for rehearing on
January 24, 2013. In the second
decision, on January 4, 2013, in Natural
Resources Defense Council v. EPA, the
D.C. Circuit remanded to EPA the ‘‘Final
Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation
Rule’’ (72 FR 20586, April 25, 2007) and
the ‘‘Implementation of the New Source
Review (NSR) Program for Particulate
Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5)’’ final rule (73 FR 28321, May
16, 2008). 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
EPA is proposing to approve the
request from the state of Indiana to
change the designation of Marion
Township, Jefferson County and Clark
and Floyd Counties (the Indiana portion
of the Louisville area) from
nonattainment to attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. This action
would not change the legal designation
of the Kentucky portion of the area,
which would be addressed in a separate
rulemaking.
III. What is the background for these
actions?
Fine particulate pollution can be
emitted directly from a source (primary
PM2.5) or formed secondarily through
chemical reactions in the atmosphere
involving precursor pollutants emitted
from a variety of sources. Sulfates are a
type of secondary particulate formed
from SO2 emissions from power plants
and industrial facilities. Nitrates,
another common type of secondary
particulate, are formed from combustion
emissions of NOX from power plants,
mobile sources and other combustion
sources.
The first air quality standards for
PM2.5 were promulgated on July 18,
1997, at 62 FR 38652. EPA promulgated
an annual standard at a level of 15
micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3) of
ambient air, based on a three-year
average of the annual mean PM2.5
concentrations at each monitoring site.
In the same rulemaking, EPA
promulgated a 24-hour PM2.5 standard at
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41737
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
65 mg/m3, based on a three-year average
of the 98th percentile of 24-hour PM2.5
concentrations at each monitoring site.
On January 5, 2005, at 70 FR 944, EPA
published air quality area designations
for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard
based on air quality data for calendar
years 2001–2003. In that rulemaking,
EPA designated the Louisville area as
nonattainment for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard.
On October 17, 2006, at 71 FR 61144,
EPA retained the annual PM2.5 standard
at 15 mg/m3 (2006 annual PM2.5
standard), but revised the 24-hour
standard to 35 mg/m3, based again on the
three-year average of the annual 98th
percentile of the 24-hour PM2.5
concentrations. In response to legal
challenges of the 2006 annual PM2.5
standard, the D.C. Circuit remanded this
standard to EPA for further
consideration. See American Farm
Bureau Federation and National Pork
Producers Council, et al. v. EPA, 559
F.3d 512 (D.C. Cir. 2009). On December
14, 2012, EPA finalized a rule revising
the PM2.5 annual standard to 12 mg/m3
based on current scientific evidence
regarding the protection of public
health. Since the Louisville area is
designated as nonattainment for the
1997 annual PM2.5 standard, today’s
proposed action addresses redesignation
to attainment only for this standard.
On March 9, 2011, EPA issued a final
determination that the entire Louisville
area attained the 1997 PM2.5 standard by
the applicable attainment date (76 FR
12860). Indiana’s original submittal
contained complete, quality-assured and
certified air monitoring data for years
2008–2010. Based upon our review of
complete, quality-assured and certified
ambient air monitoring data from 2009–
2011, we are proposing to determine
that the area continues to attain the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Further,
recently state certified data for 2012
indicate that the area continues to attain
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
IV. What are the criteria for
redesignation to attainment?
The CAA sets forth the requirements
for redesignating a nonattainment area
to attainment. Specifically, section
107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA allows for
redesignation provided that: (1) The
Administrator determines that the area
has attained the applicable NAAQS
based on current air quality data; (2) the
Administrator has fully approved an
applicable SIP for the area under section
110(k) of the CAA; (3) the Administrator
determines that the improvement in air
quality is due to permanent and
enforceable emission reductions
resulting from implementation of the
applicable SIP, Federal air pollution
control regulations and other permanent
and enforceable emission reductions; (4)
the Administrator has fully approved a
maintenance plan for the area meeting
the requirements of section 175A of the
CAA; and (5) the state containing the
area has met all requirements applicable
to the area for purposes of redesignation
under section 110 and part D of the
CAA.
V. What is EPA’s analysis of the State’s
request?
EPA is proposing to grant the
redesignation of the Indiana portion of
the Louisville area to attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and is
proposing to approve Indiana’s
maintenance plan for the area and other
related SIP revisions. The bases for
these actions follow.
1. Attainment (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i))
As noted above, in a rulemaking
published on March 9, 2011, EPA
determined that the Louisville area
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
by the applicable attainment date. The
basis and effect of this determination
were discussed in the proposed (75 FR
55725) and final (76 FR 12860) actions.
The determination was based on
certified quality-assured air quality
monitoring data for 2007–2009 showing
the area had met the standard by the
attainment date. In this action, we are
proposing to determine that the
Louisville area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS based upon the
most recent three years of complete,
certified and quality-assured data, as
required by section 107(d)(3)(E) of the
CAA. Under EPA’s regulations at 40
CFR 50.7, the annual primary and
secondary PM2.5 standards are met when
the annual arithmetic mean
concentration, as determined in
accordance with 40 CFR part 50,
appendix N, is less than or equal to 15.0
mg/m3 at all relevant monitoring sites in
the area.
EPA has reviewed the ambient air
quality monitoring data in the Louisville
area, consistent with the requirements
contained at 40 CFR part 50. EPA’s
review focused on data recorded in the
EPA Air Quality System (AQS) database
for the Louisville PM2.5 nonattainment
area from 2009–2011, and 2010–2012.
EPA also considered preliminary data
for 2012, for which EPA has not yet
calculated design values.
The Louisville area has seven
monitors that are located in Clark and
Floyd counties, Indiana, and Jefferson
County, Kentucky. Recently certified
state monitored data has been used to
calculate design value from 2010–2012
for PM2.5 that ranged 11.0–13.2 mg/m3
for the 1997 annual standard. The
monitors in the Louisville area recorded
complete data in accordance with
criteria set forth by EPA in 40 CFR part
50, appendix N, where a complete year
of air quality data comprises four
calendar quarters, with each quarter
containing data with at least 75%
capture of the scheduled sampling days.
Available data are considered to be
sufficient for comparison to the NAAQS
if three consecutive complete years of
data exist.
TABLE 1—THE 1997 ANNUAL PM2.5 DESIGN VALUES FOR THE LOUISVILLE MONITOR WITH COMPLETE DATA FOR THE
2009–2011 AND 2010–2012 DESIGN VALUES 1 IN μG/M3
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
County
Site
Clark County, IN ..........................................................................................................................
Clark County, IN ..........................................................................................................................
Floyd County, IN ..........................................................................................................................
Jefferson County, KY ...................................................................................................................
Jefferson County, KY ...................................................................................................................
Jefferson County, KY ...................................................................................................................
Jefferson County, KY ...................................................................................................................
1 As
180190006
180190008
180431004
211110043
211110044
211110051
211110067
defined in 40 CFR part 50, appendix N(1)(c).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Annual standard design
value 2009–
2011 (μg/m3)
Annual standard design
value 2010–
2012 (μg/m3)
13.5
11.4
12.3
12.6
12.8
12.7
12.1
13.2
11.0
11.8
11.8
12.1
12.3
11.5
41738
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
EPA’s review of monitoring data from
the 2009–2011 and 2010–2012
monitoring periods supports EPA’s
determination that the Louisville area
has monitored attainment. EPA
proposes to determine that the
Louisville area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 standard.
2. The Area Has Met All Applicable
Requirements Under Section 110 and
Part D and Has a Fully Approved SIP
Under Section 110(k) (Sections
107(d)(3)(E)(v) and 107(d)(3)(E)(ii))
We have determined that Indiana’s
SIP meets all applicable SIP
requirements for purposes of
redesignation for the Louisville area
under section 110 of the CAA for
purposes of redesignation in accordance
with section 107(d)(3)(E)(v). In addition,
with the exception of the emissions
inventory under section 172(c)(3), we
have previously approved all applicable
requirements of the Indiana SIP for
purposes of redesignation, in
accordance with section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii).
As discussed below, in this action EPA
is approving Indiana’s 2008 emissions
inventory as meeting the section
172(c)(3) comprehensive emissions
inventory requirement.
In making these determinations, we
have ascertained which SIP
requirements are applicable to the area
for purposes of redesignation, and have
determined that they are fully approved
under section 110(k) of the CAA.
a. The Louisville Area Has Met All
Applicable Requirements for Purposes
of Redesignation Under Section 110 and
Part D of the CAA
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
i. Section 110 General SIP Requirements
Section 110(a) of title I of the CAA
contains the general requirements for a
SIP. Section 110(a)(2) provides that the
implementation plan submitted by a
state must have been adopted by the
state after reasonable public notice and
hearing, and, among other things, must:
Include enforceable emission
limitations and other control measures,
means or techniques necessary to meet
the requirements of the CAA; provide
for establishment and operation of
appropriate devices, methods, systems,
and procedures necessary to monitor
ambient air quality; provide for
implementation of a source permit
program to regulate the modification
and construction of any stationary
source within the areas covered by the
plan; include provisions for the
implementation of part C, Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) and part
D, NSR permit programs; include
criteria for stationary source emission
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
control measures, monitoring, and
reporting; include provisions for air
quality modeling; and provide for
public and local agency participation in
planning and emission control rule
development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA
requires that SIPs contain measures to
prevent sources in a state from
significantly contributing to air quality
problems in another state. EPA believes
that the requirements linked with a
particular nonattainment area’s
designation and classification are the
relevant measures to evaluate in
reviewing a redesignation request. The
transport SIP submittal requirements,
where applicable, continue to apply to
a state regardless of the designation of
any one particular area in the state.
Thus, we believe that these
requirements should not be construed to
be applicable requirements for purposes
of redesignation.
Further, we believe that the other
section 110 elements described above
that are not connected with
nonattainment plan submissions and
not linked with an area’s attainment
status are also not applicable
requirements for purposes of
redesignation. A state remains subject to
these requirements after an area is
redesignated to attainment. We
conclude that only the section 110 and
part D requirements that are linked with
a particular area’s designation and
classification are the relevant measures
which we may consider in evaluating a
redesignation request. This approach is
consistent with EPA’s existing policy on
applicability of conformity and
oxygenated fuels requirements for
redesignation purposes, as well as with
section 184 ozone transport
requirements. See Reading,
Pennsylvania, proposed and final
rulemakings (61 FR 53174–53176
(October 10, 1996)) and (62 FR 24826
(May 7, 1997)); Cleveland-Akron-Lorain,
Ohio, final rulemaking (61 FR 20458
(May 7, 1996)); and Tampa, Florida,
final rulemaking (60 FR 62748
(December 7, 1995)). See also the
discussion on this issue in the
Cincinnati, Ohio 1-hour ozone
redesignation (65 FR 37890 (June 19,
2000)), and in the Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 1-hour ozone
redesignation (66 FR 50399 (October 19,
2001)).
We have reviewed Indiana’s SIP and
have concluded that it meets the general
SIP requirements under section 110 of
the CAA to the extent they are
applicable for purposes of
redesignation. EPA has previously
approved provisions into the Indiana
SIP addressing section 110 elements
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under particulate standards (40 CFR
52.770). On December 7, 2007,
September 9, 2008, March 23, 2011, and
April 7, 2011, Indiana made submittals
addressing ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’
elements required by section 110(a)(2)
of the CAA. EPA approved elements of
Indiana’s submittals on July 13, 2011, at
76 FR 41075. The requirements of
section 110(a)(2), however, are
statewide requirements that are not
linked to the PM2.5 nonattainment status
of the Louisville area. Therefore, EPA
believes that these SIP elements are not
applicable requirements for purposes of
review of the state’s PM2.5 redesignation
request.
ii. Part D Requirements
EPA has determined that, upon
approval of the base year emissions
inventories discussed in section IV.C. of
this rulemaking, the Indiana SIP will
meet the applicable SIP requirements
for the Louisville area applicable for
purposes of redesignation under part D
of the CAA. Subpart 1 of part D, found
in sections 172–176 of the CAA, sets
forth the basic nonattainment
requirements applicable to all
nonattainment areas.
1. Subpart 1
(a) Section 172 Requirements.
For purposes of evaluating this
redesignation request, the applicable
section 172 SIP requirements for the
Louisville area are contained in sections
172(c)(1)–(9). A thorough discussion of
the requirements contained in section
172 can be found in the General
Preamble for Implementation of Title I
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992).
Section 172(c)(1) requires the plans
for all nonattainment areas to provide
for the implementation of all reasonably
available control measures (RACM) as
expeditiously as practicable and to
provide for attainment of the primary
NAAQS. EPA interprets this
requirement to impose a duty on all
nonattainment areas to consider all
available control measures and to adopt
and implement such measures that are
reasonably available for implementation
in each area as components of the area’s
attainment demonstration. Because the
Louisville area has reached attainment,
Indiana does not need to address
additional measures to provide for
attainment, and section 172(c)(1)
requirements are no longer considered
to be applicable as long as the area
continues to attain the standard until
redesignation. These requirements were
suspended with the previous action (76
FR 12860) that determined attainment of
the standard, as discussed above.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
The reasonable further progress (RFP)
requirement under section 172(c)(2) is
defined as progress that must be made
toward attainment. This requirement is
not relevant for purposes of
redesignation because the Louisville
area has monitored attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. (‘‘General
Preamble for the Interpretation of Title
I of the CAA Amendments of 1990’’; (57
FR 13498, 13564, April 16, 1992)). See
also 40 CFR 51.918. The requirement to
submit the section 172(c)(9) contingency
measures is similarly not applicable for
purposes of redesignation. Id.
Section 172(c)(3) requires submission
and approval of a comprehensive,
accurate and current inventory of actual
emissions. Indiana submitted a 2008
base year emissions inventory along
with the redesignation request. As
discussed below in section IV.C., EPA is
approving the 2008 inventory as
meeting the section 172(c)(3) emissions
inventory requirement for the Louisville
area.
Section 172(c)(4) requires the
identification and quantification of
allowable emissions for major new and
modified stationary sources in an area,
and section 172(c)(5) requires source
permits for the construction and
operation of new and modified major
stationary sources anywhere in the
nonattainment area. EPA approved
Indiana’s current part D (nonattainment)
NSR program on October 7, 1994 (59 FR
51108). Nonetheless, since PSD
requirements will apply after
redesignation, the area need not have a
fully-approved part D NSR program for
purposes of redesignation, provided that
the area demonstrates maintenance of
the NAAQS without part D NSR. A
detailed rationale for this view is
described in a memorandum from Mary
Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air
and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994,
entitled, ‘‘Part D New Source Review
Requirements for Areas Requesting
Redesignation to Attainment.’’ Indiana
has demonstrated that the Louisville
area will be able to maintain the
standard without part D NSR in effect;
therefore, the state need not have a fully
approved part D NSR program prior to
approval of the redesignation request.
The state’s PSD program will become
effective in the Louisville area upon
redesignation to attainment. See
rulemakings for Detroit, Michigan (60
FR 12467–12468, March 7, 1995);
Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio (61 FR
20458, 20469–20470, May 7, 1996);
Louisville, Kentucky (66 FR 53665,
October 23, 2001); and Grand Rapids,
Michigan (61 FR 31834–31837, June 21,
1996).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Section 172(c)(6) requires the SIP to
contain control measures necessary to
provide for attainment of the standard.
Because attainment has been reached,
no additional measures are needed to
provide for attainment.
Section 172(c)(7) requires the SIP to
meet the applicable provisions of
section 110(a)(2). As noted above, we
believe the Indiana SIP meets the
section 110(a)(2) requirements
applicable for purposes of
redesignation.
(b) Section 176 Conformity
Requirements.
Section 176(c) of the CAA requires
states to establish criteria and
procedures to ensure that Federallysupported or funded activities,
including highway projects, conform to
the air quality planning goals in the
applicable SIPs. The requirement to
determine conformity applies to
transportation plans, programs and
projects developed, funded or approved
under title 23 of the U.S. Code and the
Federal Transit Act (‘‘transportation
conformity’’) as well as to all other
Federally-supported or funded projects
(‘‘general conformity’’). State
transportation conformity regulations
must be consistent with Federal
conformity regulations relating to
consultation, enforcement, and
enforceability, which EPA promulgated
pursuant to CAA requirements.
EPA approved Indiana’s general and
transportation conformity SIPs on
January 14, 1998 (63 FR 2146), and
August 17, 2010 (75 FR 50730),
respectively. Section 176(c) of the CAA
was amended by provisions contained
in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEALU), which
was signed into law on August 10, 2005
(Pub. L. 109–59). In adopting this
revision to the CAA, Congress
streamlined the requirements for state
conformity SIPs. Indiana is in the
process of updating its transportation
conformity SIP to meet these new
requirements.
Indiana has submitted on-road
MVEBs for the Louisville area of 580.69
tons per year (tpy) and 324.04 tpy of
primary PM2.5 and 17,700.95 tpy and
9,311.76 tpy of NOX for the years 2015
and 2025, respectively. The area must
use the MVEBs from the maintenance
plan in any conformity determination
that is made on or after the effective
date of the adequacy finding and
maintenance plan approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41739
2. Effect of the January 4, 2013, D.C.
Circuit Decision Regarding PM2.5
Implementation Under Subpart 4
a. Background
As discussed above, on January 4,
2013, in Natural Resources Defense
Council v. EPA, the DC Circuit
remanded to EPA the ‘‘Final Clean Air
Fine Particle Implementation Rule’’ (72
FR 20586, April 25, 2007) and the
‘‘Implementation of the New Source
Review (NSR) Program for Particulate
Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers
(PM2.5)’’ final rule (73 FR 28321, May
16, 2008) (collectively, ‘‘1997 PM2.5
Implementation Rule’’). 706 F.3d 428
(DC Cir. 2013). The Court found that
EPA erred in implementing the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS pursuant to the general
implementation provisions of subpart 1
of part D of title I of the CAA, rather
than the particulate-matter-specific
provisions of subpart 4 of part D of title
I.
b. Proposal on This Issue
As explained below, EPA is proposing
to determine that the Court’s January 4,
2013, decision does not prevent EPA
from redesignating the Louisville area to
attainment. Even in light of the Court’s
decision, redesignation for this area is
appropriate under the CAA and EPA’s
longstanding interpretations of the
CAA’s provisions regarding
redesignation. EPA’slongstanding
interpretation that requirements that are
imposed, or that become due, after a
complete redesignation request is
submitted for an area that is attaining
the standard, are not applicable for
purposes of evaluating a redesignation
request. Second, even if EPA applies the
subpart 4 requirements to the Louisville
redesignation request and disregards the
provisions of its 1997 PM2.5
implementation rule recently remanded
by the Court, the state’s request for
redesignation of this area still qualifies
for approval.
i. Applicable Requirements for Purposes
of Evaluating the Redesignation Request
With respect to the 1997 PM2.5
implementation rule, the Court’s
January 4, 2013, ruling rejected EPA’s
reasons for implementing the PM2.5
NAAQS solely in accordance with the
provisions of subpart 1, and remanded
that matter to EPA, so that it could
address implementation of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS under subpart 4 of part D
of the CAA, in addition to subpart 1. For
the purposes of evaluating Indiana’s
redesignation request for the area, to the
extent that implementation under
subpart 4 would impose additional
requirements for areas designated
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41740
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
nonattainment, EPA believes that those
requirements are not ‘‘applicable’’ for
the purposes of CAA section
107(d)(3)(E), and thus EPA is not
required to consider subpart 4
requirements with respect to the
Louisville redesignation. Under its
longstanding interpretation of the CAA,
EPA has interpreted section 107(d)(3)(E)
to mean, as a threshold matter, that the
part D provisions which are
‘‘applicable’’ and which must be
approved in order for EPA to
redesignate an area include only those
which came due prior to a state’s
submittal of a complete redesignation
request. See ‘‘Procedures for Processing
Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,’’ Memorandum from John
Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, September 4,
1992 (Calcagni memorandum). See also
‘‘State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Requirements for Areas Submitting
Requests for Redesignation to
Attainment of the Ozone and Carbon
Monoxide (CO) NAAQS on or after
November 15, 1992,’’ Memorandum
from Michael Shapiro, Acting Assistant
Administrator, Air and Radiation,
September 17, 1993 (Shapiro
memorandum); Final Redesignation of
Detroit-Ann Arbor, (60 FR 12459,
12465–66, March 7, 1995); Final
Redesignation of St. Louis, Missouri, (68
FR 25418, 25424–27, May 12, 2003);
Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.3d 537, 541
(7th Cir. 2004) (upholding EPA’s
redesignation rulemaking applying this
interpretation and expressly rejecting
Sierra Club’s view that the meaning of
‘‘applicable’’ under the statute is
‘‘whatever should have been in the plan
at the time of attainment rather than
whatever actually was in the plan and
already implemented or due at the time
of attainment’’).2 In this case, at the time
that Indiana submitted its redesignation
request, requirements under subpart 4
were not due,[and indeed, were not yet
known to apply.]
EPA’s view that, for purposes of
evaluating the Louisville redesignation,
the subpart 4 requirements were not due
at the time the state submitted the
redesignation request is in keeping with
the EPA’s interpretation of subpart 2
requirements for subpart 1 ozone areas
redesignated subsequent to the D.C.
Circuit’s decision in South Coast Air
Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d
882 (D.C. Cir. 2006). In South Coast, the
Court found that EPA was not permitted
2 Applicable requirements of the CAA that come
due subsequent to the area’s submittal of a complete
redesignation request remain applicable until a
redesignation is approved, but are not required as
a prerequisite to redesignation. Section 175A(c) of
the CAA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
to implement the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard solely under subpart 1, and
held that EPA was required under the
statute to implement the standard under
the ozone-specific requirements of
subpart 2 as well. Subsequent to the
South Coast decision, in evaluating and
acting upon redesignation requests for
the 1997 8-hour ozone standard that
were submitted to EPA for areas under
subpart 1, EPA applied its longstanding
interpretation of the CAA that
‘‘applicable requirements’’, for purposes
of evaluating a redesignation, are those
that had been due at the time the
redesignation request was submitted.
See, e.g., Proposed Redesignation of
Manitowoc County and Door County
Nonattainment Areas (75 FR 22047,
22050, April 27, 2010). In those actions,
EPA therefore did not consider subpart
2 requirements to be ‘‘applicable’’ for
the purposes of evaluating whether the
area should be redesignated under
section 107(d)(3)(E).
EPA’s interpretation derives from the
provisions of CAA Section 107(d)(3).
Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) states that, for an
area to be redesignated, a state must
meet ‘‘all requirements ‘applicable’ to
the area under section 110 and part D’’.
Section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) provides that the
EPA must have fully approved the
‘‘applicable’’ SIP for the area seeking
redesignation. These two sections read
together support EPA’s interpretation of
‘‘applicable’’ as only those requirements
that came due prior to submission of a
complete redesignation request. First,
holding states to an ongoing obligation
to adopt new CAA requirements that
arose after the state submitted its
redesignation request, in order to be
redesignated, would make it
problematic or impossible for EPA to act
on redesignation requests in accordance
with the 18-month deadline Congress
set for EPA action in section
107(d)(3)(D). If ‘‘applicable
requirements’’ were interpreted to be a
continuing flow of requirements with no
reasonable limitation, states, after
submitting a redesignation request,
would be forced continuously to make
additional SIP submissions that in turn
would require EPA to undertake further
notice-and-comment rulemaking actions
to act on those submissions. This would
create a regime of unceasing rulemaking
that would delay action on the
redesignation request beyond the 18month timeframe provided by the CAA
for this purpose.
Second, a fundamental premise for
redesignating a nonattainment area to
attainment is that the area has attained
the relevant NAAQS due to emission
reductions from existing controls. Thus,
an area for which a redesignation
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
request has been submitted would have
already attained the NAAQS as a result
of satisfying statutory requirements that
came due prior to the submission of the
request. Absent a showing that
unadopted and unimplemented
requirements are necessary for future
maintenance, it is reasonable to view
the requirements applicable for
purposes of evaluating the redesignation
request as including only those SIP
requirements that have already come
due. These are the requirements that led
to attainment of the NAAQS. To require,
for redesignation approval, that a state
also satisfy additional SIP requirements
coming due after the state submits its
complete redesignation request, and
while EPA is reviewing it, would
compel the state to do more than is
necessary to attain the NAAQS, without
a showing that the additional
requirements are necessary for
maintenance.
In the context of this redesignation,
the timing and nature of the Court’s
January 4, 2013, decision in NRDC v.
EPA compound the consequences of
imposing requirements that come due
after the redesignation request is
submitted. The state submitted its
redesignation request on June 16, 2011,
but the Court did not issue its decision
remanding EPA’s 1997 PM2.5
implementation rule concerning the
applicability of the provisions of
subpart 4 until January 2013.
To require the state’s fully-completed
and pending redesignation request to
comply now with requirements of
subpart 4 that the Court announced only
in January, 2013, would be to give
retroactive effect to such requirements
when the state had no notice that it was
required to meet them. The D.C. Circuit
recognized the inequity of this type of
retroactive impact in Sierra Club v.
Whitman, 285 F.3d 63 (D.C. Cir. 2002),3
where it upheld the District Court’s
ruling refusing to make retroactive
EPA’s determination that the St. Louis
area did not meet its attainment
deadline. In that case, petitioners urged
the Court to make EPA’s nonattainment
determination effective as of the date
that the statute required, rather than the
later date on which EPA actually made
the determination. The Court rejected
this view, stating that applying it
‘‘would likely impose large costs on
3 Sierra Club v. Whitman was discussed and
distinguished in a recent D.C. Circuit decision that
addressed retroactivity in a quite different context,
where, unlike the situation here, EPA sought to give
its regulations retroactive effect. National
Petrochemical and Refiners Ass’n v. EPA. 630 F.3d
145, 163 (D.C. Cir. 2010), rehearing denied, 643
F.3d 958 (D.C. Cir. 2011), cert denied, 132 S. Ct. 571
(2011).
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
states, which would face fines and suits
for not implementing air pollution
prevention plans . . . even though they
were not on notice at the time.’’ Id. at
68. Similarly, it would be unreasonable
to penalize Indiana by rejecting its
redesignation request for an area that is
already attaining the 1997 PM2.5
standard and that met all applicable
requirements known to be in effect at
the time of the request. For EPA now to
reject the redesignation request solely
because the state did not expressly
address subpart 4 requirements of
which it had no notice, would inflict the
same unfairness condemned by the
Court in Sierra Club v. Whitman.
ii. Subpart 4 Requirements and Indiana
Redesignation Request
Even if EPA were to take the view that
the Court’s January 4, 2013, decision
requires that, in the context of pending
redesignations, subpart 4 requirements
were due and in effect at the time the
state submitted its redesignation
request, EPA proposes to determine that
the Louisville area still qualifies for
redesignation to attainment. As
explained below, EPA believes that the
redesignation request for the Louisville
area, though not expressed in terms of
subpart 4 requirements, substantively
meets the requirements of that subpart
for purposes of redesignating the area to
attainment.
With respect to evaluating the
relevant substantive requirements of
subpart 4 for purposes of redesignating
the Louisville area, EPA notes that
subpart 4 incorporates components of
subpart 1 of part D, which contains
general air quality planning
requirements for areas designated as
nonattainment. See Section 172(c).
Subpart 4 itself contains specific
planning and scheduling requirements
for PM10 4 nonattainment areas, and
under the Court’s January 4, 2013,
decision in NRDC v. EPA, these same
statutory requirements also apply for
PM2.5 nonattainment areas. EPA has
longstanding general guidance that
interprets the 1990 amendments to the
CAA, making recommendations to states
for meeting the statutory requirements
for SIPs for nonattainment areas. See,
‘‘State Implementation Plans; General
Preamble for the Implementation of
Title I of the Clear Air Act Amendments
of 1990,’’ 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992)
(the ‘‘General Preamble’’). In the General
Preamble, EPA discussed the
relationship of subpart 1 and subpart 4
SIP requirements, and pointed out that
subpart 1 requirements were to an
4 PM
refers to particulates nominally 10
micrometers in diameter or smaller.
10
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
extent ‘‘subsumed by, or integrally
related to, the more specific PM10
requirements.’’ 57 FR 13538 (April 16,
1992). The subpart 1 requirements
include, among other things, provisions
for attainment demonstrations, RACM,
RFP, emissions inventories, and
contingency measures.
For the purposes of this redesignation,
in order to identify any additional
requirements which would apply under
subpart 4, we are considering the
Louisville area to be a ‘‘moderate’’ PM2.5
nonattainment area. Under section 188
of the CAA, all areas designated
nonattainment areas under subpart 4
would initially be classified by
operation of law as ‘‘moderate’’
nonattainment areas, and would remain
moderate nonattainment areas unless
and until EPA reclassifies the area as a
‘‘serious’’ nonattainment area.
Accordingly, EPA believes that it is
appropriate to limit the evaluation of
the potential impact of subpart 4
requirements to those that would be
applicable to moderate nonattainment
areas. Sections 189(a) and (c) of subpart
4 apply to moderate nonattainment
areas and include the following: (1) An
approved permit program for
construction of new and modified major
stationary sources (section 189(a)(1)(A));
(2) an attainment demonstration (section
189(a)(1)(B)); (3) provisions for RACM
(section 189(a)(1)(C)); and (4)
quantitative milestones demonstrating
RFP toward attainment by the
applicable attainment date (section
189(c)).
The permit requirements of subpart 4,
as contained in section 189(a)(1)(A),
refer to and apply the subpart 1 permit
provisions requirements of sections 172
and 173 to PM10, without adding to
them. Consequently, EPA believes that
section 189(a)(1)(A) does not itself
impose for redesignation purposes any
additional requirements for moderate
areas beyond those contained in subpart
1.5 In any event, in the context of
redesignation, EPA has long relied on
the interpretation that a fully approved
nonattainment new source review
program is not considered an applicable
requirement for redesignation, provided
the area can maintain the standard with
a PSD program after redesignation. A
detailed rationale for this view is
described in a memorandum from Mary
Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air
and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994,
entitled, ‘‘Part D New Source Review
Requirements for Areas Requesting
Redesignation to Attainment.’’ See also
5 The potential effect of section 189(e) on section
189(a)(1)(A) for purposes of evaluating this
redesignation is discussed below.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41741
rulemakings for Detroit, Michigan (60
FR 12467–12468, March 7, 1995);
Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio (61 FR
20458, 20469–20470, May 7, 1996);
Louisville, Kentucky (66 FR 53665,
October 23, 2001); and Grand Rapids,
Michigan (61 FR 31834–31837, June 21,
1996).
With respect to the specific
attainment planning requirements under
subpart 4,6 when EPA evaluates a
redesignation request under either
subpart 1 and/or 4, any area that is
attaining the PM2.5 standard is viewed
as having satisfied the attainment
planning requirements for these
subparts. For redesignations, EPA has
for many years interpreted attainmentlinked requirements as not applicable
for areas attaining the standard. In the
General Preamble, EPA stated that:
The requirements for RFP will not apply in
evaluating a request for redesignation to
attainment since, at a minimum, the air
quality data for the area must show that the
area has already attained. Showing that the
State will make RFP towards attainment will,
therefore, have no meaning at that point.
‘‘General Preamble for the Interpretation
of Title I of the CAA Amendments of
1990’’; (57 FR 13498, 13564, April 16,
1992).
The General Preamble also explained
that
[t]he section 172(c)(9) requirements are
directed at ensuring RFP and attainment by
the applicable date. These requirements no
longer apply when an area has attained the
standard and is eligible for redesignation.
Furthermore, section 175A for maintenance
plans . . . provides specific requirements for
contingency measures that effectively
supersede the requirements of section
172(c)(9) for these areas. Id.
EPA similarly stated in its 1992
Calcagni memorandum that, ‘‘The
requirements for reasonable further
progress and other measures needed for
attainment will not apply for
redesignations because they only have
meaning for areas not attaining the
standard.’’
It is evident that even if we were to
consider the Court’s January 4, 2013,
decision in NRDC v. EPA to mean that
attainment-related requirements specific
to subpart 4 should be imposed
retroactively 7 and thus are now past
due, those requirements do not apply to
an area that is attaining the 1997 PM2.5
standard, for the purpose of evaluating
6 These are attainment demonstration, RFP,
RACM, milestone requirements, contingency
measures.
7 As EPA has explained above, we do not believe
that the Court’s January 4, 2013, decision should be
interpreted so as to impose these requirements on
the states retroactively. Sierra Club v. Whitman,
supra.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41742
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
a pending request to redesignate the
area to attainment. EPA has consistently
enunciated this interpretation of
applicable requirements under section
107(d)(3)(E) since the General Preamble
was published more than twenty years
ago. Courts have recognized the scope of
EPA’s authority to interpret ‘‘applicable
requirements’’ in the redesignation
context. See Sierra Club v. EPA, 375
F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004).
Moreover, even outside the context of
redesignations, EPA has viewed the
obligations to submit attainment-related
SIP planning requirements of subpart 4
as inapplicable for areas that EPA
determines are attaining the standard.
EPA’s prior ‘‘Clean Data Policy’’
rulemakings for the PM10 NAAQS, also
governed by the requirements of subpart
4, explain EPA’s reasoning. They
describe the effects of a determination of
attainment on the attainment-related SIP
planning requirements of subpart 4. See
‘‘Determination of Attainment for Coso
Junction Nonattainment Area,’’ (75 FR
27944, May 19, 2010). See also Coso
Junction proposed PM10 redesignation,
(75 FR 36023, 36027, June 24, 2010);
Proposed and Final Determinations of
Attainment for San Joaquin
Nonattainment Area (71 FR 40952,
40954–55, July 19, 2006; and 71 FR
63641, 63643–47 October 30, 2006). In
short, EPA in this context has also long
concluded that to require states to meet
superfluous SIP planning requirements
is not necessary and not required by the
CAA, so long as those areas continue to
attain the relevant NAAQS.
Elsewhere in this notice, EPA
proposes to determine that the area has
attained the 1997 PM2.5 standard. Under
its longstanding interpretation, EPA is
proposing to determine here that the
area meets the attainment-related plan
requirements of subparts 1 and 4.
Thus, EPA is proposing to conclude
that the requirements to submit an
attainment demonstration under
189(a)(1)(B), a RACM determination
under section 172(c)d section
189(a)(1)(c), a RFP demonstration under
189(c)(1), and contingency measure
requirements under section 172(c)(9) are
satisfied for purposes of evaluating the
redesignation request.
precursors such as NOX from major
stationary, mobile, and area sources in
order to attain the standard as
expeditiously as practicable, CAA
section 189(e) specifically provides that
control requirements for major
stationary sources of direct PM10 shall
also apply to PM10 precursors from
those sources, except where EPA
determines that major stationary sources
of such precursors ‘‘do not contribute
significantly to PM10 levels which
exceed the standard in the area.’’
EPA’s 1997 PM2.5 implementation
rule, remanded by the D.C. Circuit,
contained rebuttable presumptions
concerning certain PM2.5 precursors
applicable to attainment plans and
control measures related to those plans.
Specifically, in 40 CFR 51.1002, EPA
provided, among other things, that a
state was ‘‘not required to address VOC
[and ammonia] as . . . PM2.5 attainment
plan precursor[s] and to evaluate
sources of VOC [and ammonia]
emissions in the State for control
measures.’’ EPA intended these to be
rebuttable presumptions. EPA
established these presumptions at the
time because of uncertainties regarding
the emission inventories for these
pollutants and the effectiveness of
specific control measures in various
regions of the country in reducing PM2.5
concentrations. EPA also left open the
possibility for such regulation of VOC
and ammonia in specific areas where
that was necessary.
The Court in its January 4, 2013,
decision made reference to both section
189(e) and 40 CFR 51.1002, and stated
that, ‘‘In light of our disposition, we
need not address the petitioners’
challenge to the presumptions in [40
CFR 51.1002] that volatile organic
compounds and ammonia are not PM2.5
precursors, as subpart 4 expressly
governs precursor presumptions.’’
NRDC v. EPA, at 27, n.10.
Elsewhere in the Court’s opinion,
however, the Court observed:
iii. Subpart 4 and Control of PM2.5
Precursors
The D.C. Circuit in NRDC v. EPA
remanded to EPA the two rules at issue
in the case with instructions to EPA to
re-promulgate them consistent with the
requirements of subpart 4. EPA in this
section addresses the Court’s opinion
with respect to PM2.5 precursors. While
past implementation of subpart 4 for
PM10 has allowed for control of PM10
For a number of reasons, EPA believes
that its proposed redesignation of [the
area] is consistent with the Court’s
decision on this aspect of subpart 4.
First, while the Court, citing section
189(e), stated that ‘‘for a PM10 area
governed by subpart 4, a precursor is
‘presumptively regulated,’ ’’ the Court
expressly declined to decide the specific
challenge to EPA’s 1997 PM2.5
implementation rule provisions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Ammonia is a precursor to fine particulate
matter, making it a precursor to both PM2.5
and PM10. For a PM10 nonattainment area
governed by subpart 4, a precursor is
presumptively regulated. See 42 U.S.C.
§ 7513a(e) [section 189(e)].
Id. at 21, n.7.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regarding ammonia and VOC as
precursors. The Court had no occasion
to reach whether and how it was
substantively necessary to regulate any
specific precursor in a particular PM2.5
nonattainment area, and did not address
what might be necessary for purposes of
acting upon a redesignation request.
However, even if EPA takes the view
that the requirements of subpart 4 were
deemed applicable at the time the state
submitted the redesignation request,
and disregards the implementation
rule’s rebuttable presumptions regarding
ammonia and VOC as PM2.5 precursors,
the regulatory consequence would be to
consider the need for regulation of all
precursors from any sources in the area
to demonstrate attainment and to apply
the section 189(e) provisions to major
stationary sources of precursors. In the
case of Louisville, EPA believes that
doing so is consistent with proposing
redesignation of the area for the 1997
PM2.5 standard. The Louisville area has
attained the standard without any
specific additional controls of VOC and
ammonia emissions from any sources in
the area.
Precursors in subpart 4 are
specifically regulated under the
provisions of section 189(e), which
requires, with important exceptions,
control requirements for major
stationary sources of PM2.5 precursors.8
Under subpart 1 and EPA’s prior
implementation rule, all major
stationary sources of PM2.5 precursors
were subject to regulation, with the
exception of ammonia and VOC. Thus
we must address here whether
additional controls of ammonia and
VOC from major stationary sources are
required under section 189(e) of subpart
4 in order to redesignate the area for the
1997 PM2.5 standard. As explained
below, we do not believe that any
additional controls of ammonia and
VOC are required in the context of this
redesignation.
In the General Preamble, EPA
discusses its approach to implementing
section 189(e). See 57 FR 13538–13542.
With regard to precursor regulation
under section 189(e), the General
Preamble explicitly stated that control
of VOCs under other Act requirements
may suffice to relieve a state from the
need to adopt precursor controls under
section 189(e). 57 FR 13542. EPA in this
proposal proposes to determine that the
SIP has met the provisions of section
8 Under either subpart 1 or subpart 4, for
purposes of demonstrating attainment as
expeditiously as practicable, a state is required to
evaluate all economically and technologically
feasible control measures for direct PM emissions
and precursor emissions, and adopt those measures
that are deemed reasonably available.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
189(e) with respect to ammonia and
VOCs as precursors. This proposed
supplemental determination is based on
our findings that: (1) The Louisville area
contains no major stationary sources of
ammonia, and (2) existing major
stationary sources of VOC are
adequately controlled under other
provisions of the CAA regulating the
ozone NAAQS.9 In the alternative, EPA
proposes to determine that, under the
express exception provisions of section
189(e), and in the context of the
redesignation of the area, which is
attaining the 1997 annual PM2.5
standard, at present ammonia and VOC
precursors from major stationary
sources do not contribute significantly
to levels exceeding the 1997 PM2.5
standard in the Louisville area. See 57
FR 13539–42.
EPA notes that its 1997 PM2.5
implementation rule provisions in 40
CFR 51.1002 were not directed at
evaluation of PM2.5 precursors in the
context of redesignation, but at SIP
plans and control measures required to
bring a nonattainment area into
attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
By contrast, redesignation to attainment
primarily requires the area to have
already attained due to permanent and
enforceable emission reductions, and to
demonstrate that controls in place can
continue to maintain the standard.
Thus, even if we regard the Court’s
January 4, 2013, decision as calling for
‘‘presumptive regulation’’ of ammonia
and VOC for PM2.5 under the attainment
planning provisions of subpart 4, those
provisions in and of themselves do not
require additional controls of these
precursors for an area that already
qualifies for redesignation. Nor does
EPA believe that requiring Indiana to
address precursors differently than they
have already would result in a
substantively different outcome.
Although, as EPA has emphasized, its
consideration here of precursor
requirements under subpart 4 is in the
context of a redesignation to attainment,
EPA’s existing interpretation of subpart
4 requirements with respect to
precursors in attainment plans for PM10
contemplates that states may develop
attainment plans that regulate only
those precursors that are necessary for
purposes of attainment in the area in
question, i.e., states may determine that
only certain precursors need be
regulated for attainment and control
purposes.10 Courts have upheld this
9 The Louisville area has reduced VOC emissions
through the implementation of various SIPapproved VOC control programs and various onroad and nonroad motor vehicle control programs.
10 See, e.g., ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans for California—San Joaquin
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
approach to the requirements of subpart
4 for PM10.11 EPA believes that
application of this approach to PM2.5
precursors under subpart 4 is
reasonable. Because the Louisville area
has already attained the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS with its current approach to
regulation of PM2.5 precursors, EPA
believes that it is reasonable to conclude
in the context of this redesignation that
there is no need to revisit the attainment
control strategy with respect to the
treatment of precursors. Even if the
Court’s decision is construed to impose
an obligation in evaluating this
redesignation request to consider
additional precursors under subpart 4, it
would not affect EPA’s approval here of
Indiana’s request for redesignation of
the Louisville area. In the context of a
redesignation, the area has shown that
it has attained the standard. Moreover,
the state has shown and EPA has
proposed to determine that attainment
in this area is due to permanent and
enforceable emissions reductions on all
precursors necessary to provide for
continued attainment. It follows
logically that no further control of
additional precursors is necessary.
Accordingly, EPA does not view the
January 4, 2013, decision of the Court as
precluding redesignation of the
Louisville area to attainment for the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS at this time.
In sum, even if Indiana were required
to address precursors for the Louisville
area under subpart 4 rather than under
subpart 1, as interpreted in EPA’s
remanded PM2.5 implementation rule,
EPA would still conclude that the area
had met all applicable requirements for
purposes of redesignation in accordance
with section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) and (v).
b. The Louisville Area Has a Fully
Approved Applicable SIP Under Section
110(k) of the CAA
Upon final approval of Indiana’s
comprehensive 2008 emissions
inventory, EPA will have fully approved
the Indiana SIP for the Louisville area
under section 110(k) of the CAA for all
requirements applicable for purposes of
redesignation. EPA may rely on prior
SIP approvals in approving a
redesignation request (See page 3 of the
September 4, 1992, John Calcagni
memorandum; Southwestern
Pennsylvania Growth Alliance v.
Valley PM–10 Nonattainment Area; Serious Area
Plan for Nonattainment of the 24-Hour and Annual
PM–10 Standards,’’ 69 FR 30006 (May 26, 2004)
(approving a PM10 attainment plan that impose
controls on direct PM10 and NOX emissions and did
not impose controls on SO2, VOC, or ammonia
emissions).
11 See, e.g., Assoc. of Irritated Residents v. EPA
et al., 423 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41743
Browner, 144 F.3d 984, 989–990 (6th
Cir. 1998); Wall v. EPA, 265 F.3d 426
(6th Cir. 2001)) plus any additional
measures it may approve in conjunction
with a redesignation action. See 68 FR
25413, 25426 (May 12, 2003). Since the
passage of the CAA of 1970, Indiana has
adopted and submitted, and EPA has
fully approved, provisions addressing
various required SIP elements under
particulate matter standards. In this
action, EPA is approving Indiana’s 2008
emissions inventory for the Louisville
area as meeting the requirement of
section 172(c)(3) of the CAA. No
Louisville area SIP provisions are
currently disapproved, conditionally
approved, or partially approved.
3. The Improvement in Air Quality Is
Due to Permanent and Enforceable
Reductions in Emissions Resulting From
Implementation of the SIP and
Applicable Federal Air Pollution
Control Regulations and Other
Permanent and Enforceable Reductions
(Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii))
EPA believes that Indiana has
demonstrated that the observed air
quality improvement in the Louisville
area is due to permanent and
enforceable reductions in emissions
resulting from implementation of the
SIP, Federal measures and other stateadopted measures.
In making this demonstration, Indiana
has calculated the change in emissions
between 2005, one of the years the
Louisville area was monitoring
nonattainment, and 2008, one of the
years the Louisville area monitored
attainment. The reduction in emissions
and the corresponding improvement in
air quality over this time period can be
attributed to a number of regulatory
control measures that the Louisville area
and contributing areas have
implemented in recent years.
a. Permanent and Enforceable Controls
Implemented
The following is a discussion of
permanent and enforceable measures
that have been implemented in the area:
i. Federal Emission Control Measures
Reductions in fine particle precursor
emissions have occurred statewide and
in upwind areas as a result of Federal
emission control measures, with
additional emission reductions expected
to occur in the future. Federal emission
control measures include the following.
Tier 2 Emission Standards for
Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur Standards.
These emission control requirements
result in lower NOX and SO2 emissions
from new cars and light duty trucks.
The Federal rules were phased in
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
41744
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
between 2004 and 2009. The EPA has
estimated that, by the end of the phasein period, new vehicles will emit less
NOX with the following percentage
decreases: Passenger cars (light duty
vehicles)—77%; light duty trucks,
minivans and sports utility vehicles—
86%; and, larger sports utility vehicles,
vans and heavier trucks—69% to 95%.
EPA expects fleet-wide average
emissions to decline by similar
percentages as new vehicles replace
older vehicles. The Tier 2 standards also
reduced the sulfur content of gasoline to
30 parts per million (ppm) beginning in
January 2006. Most gasoline sold in
Indiana prior to January 2006 had a
sulfur content of about 500 ppm.
Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Rule. EPA
issued this rule in July 2000. This rule
includes standards limiting the sulfur
content of diesel fuel, which went into
effect in 2004. A second phase took
effect in 2007 which reduced fine
particle emissions from heavy-duty
highway engines and further reduced
the highway diesel fuel sulfur content to
15 ppm. The total program is estimated
to achieve a 90% reduction in direct
PM2.5 emissions and a 95% reduction in
NOX emissions for these new engines
using low sulfur diesel, compared to
existing engines using higher sulfur
content diesel. The reduction in fuel
sulfur content also yielded an
immediate reduction in sulfate particle
emissions from all diesel vehicles.
Nonroad Diesel Rule. In May 2004,
EPA promulgated a new rule for large
nonroad diesel engines, such as those
used in construction, agriculture and
mining equipment, to be phased in
between 2008 and 2014. The rule also
reduces the sulfur content in nonroad
diesel fuel by over 99%. Prior to 2006,
nonroad diesel fuel averaged
approximately 3,400 ppm sulfur. This
rule limited nonroad diesel sulfur
content to 500 ppm by 2006, with a
further reduction to 15 ppm by 2010.
The combined engine and fuel rules will
reduce NOX and PM2.5 emissions from
large nonroad diesel engines by over
90%, compared to current nonroad
engines using higher sulfur content
diesel. It is estimated that compliance
with this rule will cut NOX emissions
from nonroad diesel engines by up to
90%. This rule achieved some emission
reductions by 2008, and was fully
implemented by 2010. The reduction in
fuel sulfur content also yielded an
immediate reduction in sulfate particle
emissions from all diesel vehicles.
Nonroad Large Spark-Ignition Engine
and Recreational Engine Standards. In
November 2002, EPA promulgated
emission standards for groups of
previously unregulated nonroad
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
engines. These engines include large
spark-ignition engines such as those
used in forklifts and airport groundservice equipment; recreational vehicles
using spark-ignition engines such as offhighway motorcycles, all-terrain
vehicles and snowmobiles; and
recreational marine diesel engines.
Emission standards from large sparkignition engines were implemented in
two tiers, with Tier 1 starting in 2004
and Tier 2 in 2007. Recreational vehicle
emission standards are being phased in
from 2006 through 2012. Marine diesel
engine standards were phased in from
2006 through 2009. With full
implementation of the entire nonroad
spark-ignition engine and recreational
engine standards, an 80% reduction in
NOX expected by 2020. Some of these
emission reductions occurred by the
2008–2010 period used to demonstrate
attainment, and additional emission
reductions will occur during the
maintenance period.
ii. Control Measures in Contributing
Areas
NOX SIP Call. On October 27, 1998
(63 FR 57356), EPA issued a NOX SIP
Call requiring the District of Columbia
and 22 states to reduce emissions of
NOX. Affected states were required to
comply with Phase I of the SIP Call
beginning in 2004, and Phase II
beginning in 2007. Emission reductions
resulting from regulations developed in
response to the NOX SIP Call are
permanent and enforceable.
CAIR. On May 12, 2005, EPA
published CAIR, which requires
significant reductions in emissions of
SO2 and NOX from electric generating
units to limit the interstate transport of
these pollutants and the ozone and fine
particulate matter they form in the
atmosphere. See 76 FR 70093. The D.C.
Circuit initially vacated CAIR, North
Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir.
2008), but ultimately remanded the rule
to EPA without vacatur to preserve the
environmental benefits provided by
CAIR, North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d
1176, 1178 (D.C. Cir. 2008). In response
to the Court’s decision, EPA issued the
Transport Rule, also known as CSAPR),
to address interstate transport of NOX
and SO2 in the eastern United States.
See 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011).
On December 30, 2011, the D.C.
Circuit issued an order addressing the
status of CSAPR and CAIR in response
to motions filed by numerous parties
seeking a stay of CSAPR pending
judicial review. In that order, the Court
stayed CSAPR pending resolution of the
petitions for review of that rule in EME
Homer City Generation. The Court also
indicated that EPA was expected to
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
continue to administer CAIR in the
interim until judicial review of CSAPR
was completed.
On August 21, 2012, the D.C. Circuit
issued a decision to vacate CSAPR. In
that decision, it also ordered EPA to
continue administering CAIR ‘‘pending
the promulgation of a valid
replacement.’’ EME Homer City, 696
F.3d at 38. The D.C. Circuit denied all
petitions for rehearing on January 24,
2013. EPA and other parties have filed
petitions for certiorari to the U.S.
Supreme Court, but those petitions have
not been acted on to date. Nonetheless,
EPA intends to continue to act in
accordance with the EME Homer City
opinion.
In light of these unique circumstances
and for the reasons explained below, to
the extent that attainment is due to
emission reductions associated with
CAIR, EPA is here proposing to
determine that those reductions are
sufficiently permanent and enforceable
for purposes of CAA sections
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) and 175A. EPA
therefore proposes to approve the
redesignation request and the related
SIP revision for Indiana portion of the
Louisville area, including Indiana’s plan
for maintaining attainment of the PM2.5
standard.
As directed by the D.C. Circuit, CAIR
remains in place and enforceable until
substituted by a valid replacement rule.
Indiana’s SIP revision lists CAIR as a
control measure that became stateeffective October 22, 2007 and was fully
approved by EPA on November 29, 2010
(75 FR 72956), for the purpose of
reducing SO2 and NOX emissions. CAIR
was thus in place and getting emission
reductions when the Louisville area
began monitoring attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The qualityassured, certified monitoring data used
to demonstrate the area’s attainment of
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the
April 2010 attainment deadline was also
impacted by CAIR.
To the extent that Indiana is relying
on CAIR in its maintenance plan, the
recent directive from the D.C. Circuit in
EME Homer City ensures that the
reductions associated with CAIR will be
permanent and enforceable for the
necessary time period. EPA has been
ordered by the Court to develop a new
rule to address interstate transport to
replace CSAPR and the opinion makes
clear that after promulgating that new
rule EPA must provide states an
opportunity to draft and submit SIPs to
implement that rule. Thus, CAIR will
remain in place until EPA has
promulgated a final rule through a
notice-and-comment rulemaking
process, States have had an opportunity
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
to draft and submit SIPs, EPA has
reviewed the SIPs to determine if they
can be approved, and EPA has taken
action on the SIPs, including
promulgating a FIP if appropriate. The
Court’s clear instruction to EPA that it
must continue to administer CAIR until
a valid replacement exists provides an
additional backstop: By definition, any
rule that replaces CAIR and meets the
Court’s direction would require upwind
states to have SIPs that eliminate
significant contributions to downwind
nonattainment and prevent interference
with maintenance in downwind areas.
Further, in vacating CSAPR and
requiring EPA to continue administering
CAIR, the D.C. Circuit emphasized that
the consequences of vacating CAIR
‘‘might be more severe now in light of
the reliance interests accumulated over
the intervening four years.’’ EME Homer
City, 696 F.3d at 38. The accumulated
reliance interests include the interests of
states who reasonably assumed they
could rely on reductions associated with
CAIR which brought certain
nonattainment areas into attainment
with the NAAQS. If EPA were
prevented from relying on reductions
associated with CAIR in redesignation
actions, states would be forced to
impose additional, redundant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
41745
reductions on top of those achieved by
CAIR. EPA believes this is precisely the
type of irrational result the Court sought
to avoid by ordering EPA to continue
administering CAIR. For these reasons
also, EPA believes it is appropriate to
allow states to rely on CAIR, and the
existing emissions reductions achieved
by CAIR, as sufficiently permanent and
enforceable for purposes such as
redesignation. Following promulgation
of the replacement rule, EPA will
review SIPs as appropriate to identify
whether there are any issues that need
to be addressed.
establishes system-wide annual tonnage
limits for NOX and SO2 for its eleven
coal-fired power plants located in
Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
NOX will be limited to 100,600 tpy
beginning in 2011 and capped at 52,000
tpy in 2018 and each year thereafter.
SO2 will be limited to 285,000 tpy
beginning in 2011 and capped at
110,000 tpy in 2019 and each year
thereafter.
This will result in significant regional
NOX and SO2 reductions, further
ensuring that the area will continue to
maintain the NAAQS in the future.
iii. Consent Decrees
Along with Federal and state rules
controlling direct PM and precursors,
there have been a number of permanent
and enforceable consent decrees that
have reduced emissions and will
continue to reduce emissions into the
future. The EPA and Duke Energy
consent decree created caps on both
NOX and SO2 similar allocations
provided for the Gallagher Generating
Station in Floyd County. Duke Energy
Indiana permanently shut-down two of
its four coal-fired Electric Generating
Units (EGUs) (Units 1 and 3) on
February 1, 2012. The Tennessee Valley
Authority has also recently entered into
a consent decree with EPA that
b. Emission Reductions
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Indiana developed emissions
inventories for NOX, direct PM2.5 and
SO2 for 2005, one of the years the area
monitored nonattainment, and 2008,
one of the years the Louisville area
monitored attainment of the standard.
EGU SO2 and NOX emissions were
derived from EPA’s Clean Air Market’s
acid rain database. These emissions
reflect Indiana and Kentucky’s NOX
emission budgets resulting from EPA’s
NOX SIP call. The 2008 emissions from
EGUs reflect Indiana’s emission caps
under CAIR. All other point source
emissions were obtained from Indiana’s
source facility emissions reporting.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41746
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Area source emissions in the
Louisville area for 2005 were taken from
periodic emissions inventories.12 These
2005 area source emission estimates
were extrapolated to 2008. Source
growth factors were supplied by the
Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium
(LADCO).
Nonroad mobile source emissions
were extrapolated from nonroad mobile
source emissions reported in EPA’s
2005 National Emissions Inventory
(NEI). Contractors were employed by
LADCO to estimate emissions for
commercial marine vessels and
railroads.
On-road mobile source emissions
were calculated using EPA’s mobile
source emission factor model,
MOVES2010a, in conjunction with
transportation model results developed
by the local metropolitan planning
organization, Kentuckiana Regional
Planning and Development Agency
(KIPDA), along with the Louisville
Metro Air Pollution Control District and
IDEM.
All emissions estimates discussed
below were documented in the
submittal and appendices of Indiana’s
redesignation request submittal from
June 16, 2011. For these data and
additional emissions inventory data, the
reader is referred to EPA’s digital docket
for this rule, https://
www.regulations.gov, for docket number
EPA–R05–OAR–2011–0698, which
includes digital copies of Indiana’s
submittal.
Emissions data in tpy for the entire
Louisville area are shown in Tables 2
and 3, below.
TABLE 2—SUMMARY OF 2005 EMISSIONS FOR THE ENTIRE LOUISVILLE AREA BY SOURCE TYPE
[tpy]
SO2
NOX
PM2.5
Point (EGU) .....................................................................................................................
Non-EGU .........................................................................................................................
On-road ............................................................................................................................
Nonroad ...........................................................................................................................
Area .................................................................................................................................
174,178.36
5,441.05
144.23
1,050.81
418.98
48,103.47
3,922.83
32,744.55
14,370.95
2,123.83
3,443.00
1,291.31
1,055.61
780.54
810.13
Total Louisville ..........................................................................................................
181,233.43
101,265.63
7,380.59
TABLE 3—COMPARISON OF 2005 EMISSIONS FROM THE NONATTAINMENT YEAR AND 2008 EMISSIONS FOR AN
ATTAINMENT YEAR FOR THE ENTIRE LOUISVILLE AREA
[tpy]
Net change
(2005–2008)
2005
PM2.5 ................................................................................................................................
NOX ..................................................................................................................................
SO2 ..................................................................................................................................
Table 3 shows that in the entire
Louisville area reduced direct PM2.5
emissions by 656.57 tons, NOX
emissions by 3,731.70 tons and SO2
2008
7,380.59
101,265.63
181,233.43
6,724.02
97,533.93
151,503.01
emissions by 29,730.42 tons between
2005, a nonattainment year, and 2008,
an attainment year.
¥656.57
¥3,731.70
¥29,730.42
Emissions data in tpy the Indiana
portion of the Louisville area are shown
in Tables 4, 5, and 6, below.
TABLE 4—SUMMARY OF 2008 BASE YEAR EMISSIONS INVENTORY FOR THE INDIANA PORTION OF THE LOUISVILLE AREA BY
SOURCE TYPE
[tpy]
SO2
NOX
PM2.5
Point .................................................................................................................................
On-road ............................................................................................................................
Nonroad ...........................................................................................................................
Area .................................................................................................................................
108,861.34
38.89
141.97
330.32
27,916.08
6,245.60
2,553.23
811.15
847.78
210.91
131.41
12.37
Total ..........................................................................................................................
109,372.52
37,526.06
1,202.47
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 5—SUMMARY OF 2007/2008 BASE YEAR EMISSIONS OF VOCS AND AMMONIA FOR THE ENTIRE LOUISVILLE AREA
BY SOURCE TYPE
[tpy]
Ammonia
Point .......................................................................................................................................................................
12 Periodic emission inventories are derived by
states every three years and reported to the EPA.
These periodic emission inventories are required by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
the Federal Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule,
codified at 40 CFR Subpart A. EPA revised these
and other emission reporting requirements in a final
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6.304
VOC
916.25
rule published on December 17, 2008, at 73 FR
76539.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
41747
TABLE 5—SUMMARY OF 2007/2008 BASE YEAR EMISSIONS OF VOCS AND AMMONIA FOR THE ENTIRE LOUISVILLE AREA
BY SOURCE TYPE—Continued
[tpy]
Ammonia
VOC
Area .......................................................................................................................................................................
Nonroad .................................................................................................................................................................
On-road ..................................................................................................................................................................
1,193.20
2.13
113.13
5,618.26
1,246.43
2,886.02
Total ................................................................................................................................................................
1,314.76
10,666.95
TABLE 6—COMPARISON OF 2005 EMISSIONS FROM THE NONATTAINMENT YEAR AND 2008 EMISSIONS FOR AN
ATTAINMENT YEAR FOR THE INDIANA PORTION OF THE LOUISVILLE AREA
[tpy]
2005
PM2.5 ................................................................................................................................
NOX ..................................................................................................................................
SO2 ..................................................................................................................................
Table 6 shows that in the Indiana
portion of the Louisville area reduced
direct PM2.5 emissions by 173.90 tons,
NOX emissions by 4,224.31 tons and
SO2 emissions by 25,810.07 tons
between 2005, a nonattainment year,
and 2008, an attainment year.
Based on the information summarized
above, Indiana has adequately
demonstrated that the improvement in
air quality is due to permanent and
enforceable emissions reductions.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4. Indiana Has a Fully Approved
Maintenance Plan Pursuant to Section
175A of the CAA (Section
107(d)(3)(E)(iv))
In conjunction with Indiana’s request
to redesignate the Indiana portion of the
Louisville nonattainment area to
attainment status, Indiana has submitted
a SIP revision to provide for
maintenance of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS in the area through 2025.
a. What is required in a maintenance
plan?
Section 175A of the CAA sets forth
the required elements of a maintenance
plan for areas seeking redesignation
from nonattainment to attainment.
Under section 175A, the plan must
demonstrate continued attainment of
the applicable NAAQS for at least ten
years after EPA approves a
redesignation to attainment. Eight years
after redesignation, the state must
submit a revised maintenance plan
which demonstrates that attainment will
continue to be maintained for ten years
following the initial ten year
maintenance period. To address the
possibility of future NAAQS violations,
the maintenance plan must contain
contingency measures with a schedule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
2008
1,376.37
41,750.37
135,182.59
1,202.47
37,526.06
109,372.52
for implementation as EPA deems
necessary to assure prompt correction of
any future annual PM2.5 violations.
The September 4, 1992, Calcagni
memorandum provides additional
guidance on the content of a
maintenance plan. The memorandum
states that a maintenance plan should
address the following items: the
attainment emissions inventories, a
maintenance demonstration showing
maintenance for the ten years of the
maintenance period, a commitment to
maintain the existing monitoring
network, factors and procedures to be
used for verification of continued
attainment of the NAAQS and a
contingency plan to prevent or correct
future violations of the NAAQS.
b. Attainment Inventory
Indiana developed emissions
inventories for NOX, direct PM2.5 and
SO2 for 2008, one of the years in the
period during which the Louisville area
monitored attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 standard, as described
previously. The attainment levels of
emissions for the entire area, as well as
the attainment levels of emissions for
the Indiana portion of the area were
summarized in Tables 3 and 5, above.
c. Demonstration of Maintenance
Along with the redesignation request,
Indiana submitted a revision to its PM2.5
SIP to include a maintenance plan for
the Louisville area, as required by
section 175A of the CAA. Section 175A
requires a state seeking redesignation to
attainment to submit a SIP revision to
provide for the maintenance of the
NAAQS in the area ‘‘for at least 10 years
after the redesignation.’’ EPA has
interpreted this as a showing of
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Net change
(2005–2008)
¥173.90
¥4,224.31
¥25,810.07
maintenance ‘‘for a period of ten years
following redesignation.’’ Calcagni
Memorandum, p. 9. Where the
emissions inventory method of showing
maintenance is used, its purpose is to
show that emissions during the
maintenance period will not increase
over the attainment year inventory.
Calcagni Memorandum, pp. 9–10. A
maintenance demonstration may be
based on such an emissions inventory
approach. See Wall v. EPA, 265 F.3d
426 (6th Cir. 2001), Sierra Club v. EPA,
375 F. 3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004). See also
66 FR 53094, 53099–53100 (October 19,
2001), 68 FR 25413, 25430–25432 (May
12, 2003).
Indiana’s plan demonstrates
maintenance of the 1997 annual PM2.5
standard through 2025 by showing that
current and future emissions of NOX,
directly emitted PM2.5 and SO2 for the
area remain at or below attainment year
emission levels.
Indiana’s submission uses emissions
inventory projections for the years 2015
and 2025 to demonstrate maintenance
for the Indiana portion of the Louisville
area. The projected emissions were
estimated by Indiana, with assistance
from LADCO and KIPDA using the
MOVES2010a model. Projection of
inventory emissions was done for the
2015 interim year emissions using
estimates based on the 2009 and 2018
LADCO modeling inventory, using
LADCO’s growth factors, for all sectors.
The 2025 maintenance year emissions
are based on emissions estimates from
the 2018 LADCO modeling. Table 7
shows the 2008 attainment base year
emission estimates and the 2015 and
2025 emission projections for the entire
tri-state Louisville area that Indiana
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41748
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
provided in its June 16, 2011,
submission.
TABLE 7—COMPARISON OF 2008, 2015 AND 2025 NOX, DIRECT PM2.5 AND SO2 EMISSION TOTALS (TPY) FOR THE
LOUISVILLE AREA
SO2
2008 (baseline) ...................................................................................................................
2015 ....................................................................................................................................
2025 ....................................................................................................................................
Change 2008–2025 ............................................................................................................
Table 7 shows that the Louisville area
will reduce NOX emissions by 38,078.76
tpy between 2008 and the maintenance
projection to 2025, direct PM2.5
emissions by 1,668.41 tpy, and reduced
SO2 emissions by 75,420.94 tpy between
2008 and 2025.
An air quality modeling analysis
conducted by IDEM demonstrates that
the Louisville area would be able to
attain the PM2.5 standard even in the
absence of either CAIR or CSAPR. See
appendices H and I. This modeling is
available in the docket for this proposed
redesignation action.
Based on the information summarized
above, Indiana has adequately
demonstrated maintenance of the PM2.5
standard in this area for a period
extending in excess of ten years from
expected final action on Indiana’s
redesignation request.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
i. Maintenance Plan and Evaluation of
VOCs and Ammonia
With regard to the redesignation of
Louisville, in evaluating the effect of the
Court’s remand of EPA’s
implementation rule, which included
presumptions against consideration of
VOC and ammonia as PM2.5 precursors,
EPA in this proposal is also considering
the impact of the decision on the
maintenance plan required under
sections 175A and 107(d)(3)(E)(iv). To
begin with, EPA notes that the area has
attained the 1997 PM2.5 standard and
that the state has shown that attainment
of that standard is due to permanent and
enforceable emission reductions.
EPA proposes to determine that the
state’s maintenance plan shows
continued maintenance of the standard
by tracking the levels of the precursors
NOX
151,503.01 .......
76,958.54 .........
76,082.07 .........
¥75,420.94 ......
50% decrease ..
97,533.93 .........
69,936.67 .........
59,455.17 .........
¥38,078.76 ......
39% decrease ..
whose control brought about attainment
of the 1997 PM2.5 standard in the
Louisville area. EPA therefore believes
that the only additional consideration
related to the maintenance plan
requirements that results from the
Court’s January 4, 2013, decision is that
of assessing the potential role of VOC
and ammonia in demonstrating
continued maintenance in this area. As
explained below, based upon
documentation provided by the State
and supporting information, EPA
believes that the maintenance plan for
the Louisville area need not include any
additional emission reductions of VOC
or ammonia in order to provide for
continued maintenance of the standard.
First, as noted above in EPA’s
discussion of section 189(e), VOC
emission levels in this area have
historically been well controlled under
SIP requirements related to ozone and
other pollutants. Second, total ammonia
emissions throughout the Louisville
area are very low, estimated to be less
than 1,500 tpy. See Table 8 below. This
amount of ammonia emissions appears
especially small in comparison to the
total amounts of SO2, NOX, and even
direct PM2.5 emissions from sources in
the area, see Table 7. Third, as described
below, available information shows that
no precursor, except ammonia, is
expected to increase over the
maintenance period so as to interfere
with or undermine the State’s
maintenance demonstration.
Indiana’s maintenance plan shows
that emissions of direct PM2.5, SO2, and
NOX are projected to decrease by 1,668
tpy, 75,420 tpy, and 38,078 tpy,
respectively, over the maintenance
PM2.5
6,724.02
5,540.29
5,055.61
¥1,668.41
25% decrease
period. See Table 7 above. In addition,
emissions inventories used in the
regulatory impact analysis (RIA), found
in the docket, for the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS, shows that VOC emissions are
projected to decrease by 14,551 tpy
between 2007 and 2020. Although
ammonia emissions are predicted to
increase slightly between 2007 and
2020, the large decrease of emissions in
other precursors in comparison will
keep the area well below the standard.
See Table 8 below. While the RIA
emissions inventories are only projected
out to 2020, there is no reason to believe
that this downward trend would not
continue through 2025. Given that the
Louisville area is already attaining the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS even with the
current level of emissions from sources
in the area, the downward trend of
emissions inventories would be
consistent with continued attainment.
Indeed, projected emissions reductions
for the precursors that the state is
addressing for purposes of the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS, indicate that the area
should continue to attain the NAAQS
following the precursor control strategy
that the state has already elected to
pursue. Even if VOC and ammonia
emissions were to increase
unexpectedly between 2020 and 2025,
the overall emissions reductions
projected in direct PM2.5, SO2, and NOX
would be sufficient to offset any
increases. For these reasons, EPA
believes that local emissions of all of the
potential PM2.5 precursors will not
increase to the extent that they will
cause monitored PM2.5 levels to violate
the 1997 PM2.5 standard during the
maintenance period.
TABLE 8—COMPARISON OF 2007 AND 2020 VOC AND AMMONIA EMISSION TOTALS BY SOURCE SECTOR (TPY) FOR THE
LOUISVILLE AREA 13
VOC
Ammonia
Sector
2007
Point .........................................................
Area ..........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
1,084
5,504
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Net change
2007–2020
2020
1,099
5,460
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2007
15
¥44
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
6
1,115
11JYP1
2020
97
1,191
Net change
2007–2020
91
76
41749
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 8—COMPARISON OF 2007 AND 2020 VOC AND AMMONIA EMISSION TOTALS BY SOURCE SECTOR (TPY) FOR THE
LOUISVILLE AREA 13—Continued
VOC
Ammonia
Sector
2007
Net change
2007–2020
2020
2007
Net change
2007–2020
2020
Nonroad ...................................................
On-road ....................................................
Fires .........................................................
1,273
2,087
73
6,39
9,35
73
¥634
¥1,152
0
2
97
5
250
68
5
248
¥29
0
Total ..................................................
10,497
8,819
¥1,678
1,270
1,407
137
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
In addition, available air quality
modeling analyses done by the state
show continued maintenance of the
standard during the maintenance
period. The current air quality design
value for the area is 13.5 mg/m3 (based
on 2009–2011 air quality data), which is
well below the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS of 15 mg/m3. Moreover, the
modeling analysis conducted for the
RIA for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
indicates that the design value for this
area is expected to continue to decline
through 2020. In the RIA analysis, the
highest 2020 modeled design value for
the Louisville area is 9.8 mg/m3. Given
that precursor emissions are projected to
decrease through 2025, it is reasonable
to conclude that monitored PM2.5 levels
in this area will also continue to
decrease through 2025.
Thus, EPA believes that there is
ample justification to conclude that the
Louisville area should be redesignated,
even taking into consideration the
emissions of other precursors
potentially relevant to PM2.5. After
consideration of the D.C. Circuit’s
January 4, 2013, decision, and for the
reasons set forth in this notice, EPA
proposes to approve the State’s
maintenance plan and its request to
redesignate the Louisville area to
attainment for the 1997 PM2.5 annual
standard.
Based on the information summarized
above, Indiana has adequately
demonstrated maintenance of the PM2.5
standard in this area for a period
extending in excess of ten years from
expected final action on Indiana’s
redesignation request.
d. Monitoring Network
Indiana’s plan includes a commitment
to continue working with Kentucky to
operate its EPA-approved monitoring
network, as necessary to demonstrate
ongoing compliance with the NAAQS.
Indiana currently operates three PM2.5
monitors in Clark and Floyd counties in
13 These emissions estimates were taken from the
emissions inventories developed for the RIA for the
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
order to monitor the Indiana portion of
the Louisville area. Kentucky currently
operates four monitors in Jefferson
County for the Louisville area.
e. Verification of Continued Attainment
Indiana remains obligated to continue
to quality-assure monitoring data and
enter all data into AQS in accordance
with Federal guidelines. Indiana will
use these data, supplemented with
additional information as necessary, to
assure that the area continues to attain
the standard. Indiana will also continue
to develop and submit periodic
emission inventories as required by the
Federal Consolidated Emissions
Reporting Rule (67 FR 39602, June 10,
2002) to track future levels of emissions.
Both of these actions will help to verify
continued attainment in accordance
with 40 CFR part 58.
f. Contingency Plan
The contingency plan provisions are
designed to promptly correct or prevent
a violation of the NAAQS that might
occur after redesignation of an area to
attainment. Section 175A of the CAA
requires that a maintenance plan
include such contingency measures as
EPA deems necessary to assure that the
state will promptly correct a violation of
the NAAQS that occurs after
redesignation. The maintenance plan
should identify the contingency
measures to be adopted, a schedule and
procedure for adoption and
implementation of the contingency
measures, and a time limit for action by
the state. The state should also identify
specific indicators to be used to
determine when the contingency
measures need to be adopted and
implemented. The maintenance plan
must include a requirement that the
state will implement all measures with
respect to control of the pollutant(s) that
were contained in the SIP before
redesignation of the area to attainment.
See section 175A(d) of the CAA.
As required by section 175A of the
CAA, Indiana has adopted a
contingency plan for the Louisville area
to address possible future annual PM2.5
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
air quality problems. Under Indiana’s
plan, if a violation of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard occurs, Indiana will
implement an ‘‘Action Level Response’’
to evaluate what measures are
warranted to address the violation,
committing to implement one or more
measures from a list of candidate
measures given in the plan. Indiana’s
candidate contingency measures
include the following:
i. Vehicle inspection and maintenance
program;
ii. Alternative fuel and diesel retrofit
programs for fleet vehicle operations;
iii. Requiring NOX or SO2 emissions
offsets for new and modified major and
minor sources;
iv. Increasing the ratio of emissions
offsets required for new sources;
v. NOX or SO2 controls on new minor
sources;
vi. Wood stove change-out program;
vii. Emission reduction measures for
unpaved roads and parking lots;
viii. Idle restrictions;
ix. Broader geographic applicability of
existing measures; and
x. One or more transportation control
measures sufficient to achieve at least a
0.5% reduction in actual area wide
precursor emissions.
Under Indiana’s plan, control
measures are to be adopted and
implemented within 18 months from
the end of the year in which air quality
triggering the Action Level Response
occurs. Indiana further commits to
conduct ongoing review of its data, and
if monitored concentrations or
emissions are trending upward, Indiana
commits to take appropriate steps to
avoid a violation if possible. EPA
believes that Indiana’s contingency plan
satisfies the pertinent requirements of
section 175A(d).
EPA believes that Indiana’s
contingency measures, as well as the
commitment to continue implementing
any SIP requirements, satisfy the
pertinent requirements of section
175A(d).
As required by section 175A(b) of the
CAA, Indiana commits to submit to the
EPA an updated PM2.5 maintenance
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41750
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
plan eight years after redesignation of
the Louisville area to cover an
additional ten year period beyond the
initial ten year maintenance period. As
required by section 175A of the CAA,
Indiana has also committed to retain the
PM2.5 control measures contained in the
SIP prior to redesignation.
For all of the reasons set forth above,
EPA is proposing to approve Indiana’s
1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for
the Louisville area as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 175A.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
5. Adequacy of Indiana’s MVEB
1. How are MVEBs developed and what
are the MVEBs for the Louisville area?
Under the CAA, states are required to
submit, at various times, control strategy
SIP revisions and maintenance plans for
PM2.5 nonattainment areas and for areas
seeking redesignation to attainment of
the PM2.5 standard. These emission
control strategy SIP revisions (e.g., RFP
and attainment demonstration SIP
revisions) and maintenance plans create
MVEBs based on on-road mobile source
emissions for criteria pollutants and/or
their precursors to address pollution
from on-road transportation sources.
The MVEBs are the portions of the total
allowable emissions that are allocated to
highway and transit vehicle use that,
together with emissions from other
sources in the area, will provide for
attainment, RFP or maintenance, as
applicable.
Under 40 CFR part 93, a MVEB for an
area seeking a redesignation to
attainment is established for the last
year of the maintenance plan and could
also be established for an interim year
or years. The MVEB serves as a ceiling
on emissions from an area’s planned
transportation system. The MVEB
concept is further explained in the
preamble to the November 24, 1993,
transportation conformity rule (58 FR
62188).
Under section 176(c) of the CAA, new
transportation plans and transportation
improvement programs (TIPs) must be
evaluated to determine if they conform
to the purpose of the area’s SIP.
Conformity to the SIP means that
transportation activities will not cause
new air quality violations, worsen
existing air quality violations, or delay
timely attainment of the NAAQS or any
required interim milestone. If a
transportation plan or TIP does not
conform, most new transportation
projects that would expand the capacity
of roadways cannot go forward.
Regulations at 40 CFR part 93 set forth
EPA policy, criteria, and procedures for
demonstrating and assuring conformity
of such transportation activities to a SIP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
When reviewing SIP revisions
containing MVEBs, including
attainment strategies, rate-of-progress
plans, and maintenance plans, EPA
must affirmatively find adequate and/or
approve the MVEBs for use in
determining transportation conformity
before the MVEBs can be used. Once
EPA affirmatively approves and/or finds
the submitted MVEBs to be adequate for
transportation conformity purposes, the
MVEBs must be used by state and
Federal agencies in determining
whether proposed transportation plans
and TIPs conform to the SIP as required
by section 176(c) of the CAA. EPA’s
substantive criteria for determining the
adequacy of MVEBs are set out in 40
CFR 93.118(e)(4). Additionally, to
approve a MVEB EPA must complete a
thorough review of the SIP, in this case
the PM2.5 maintenance plans, and
conclude that the SIP will achieve its
overall purpose, in this case providing
for maintenance of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard in the Indiana portions
of the Louisville area.
EPA’s process for determining
adequacy of a MVEB consists of three
basic steps: (1) Providing public
notification of a SIP submission; (2)
providing the public the opportunity to
comment on the MVEB during a public
comment period; and, (3) EPA taking
action on the MVEB. The process for
determining the adequacy of submitted
SIP MVEBs is codified at 40 CFR 93.118.
The maintenance plan submitted by
Indiana for the Louisville area contains
new primary PM2.5 and NOX MVEBs for
the area for the years 2015 and 2025.
The motor vehicle emissions budgets
were calculated using MOVES2010(a).
After the adequacy finding and approval
of the budgets become effective, the
budgets will have to be used in future
conformity determinations and regional
emissions analyses prepared by the
KIPDA, will have to be based on the use
of MOVES2010a or the most recent
version of MOVES required to be used
in transportation conformity
determinations.14 The states have
determined the 2015 MVEBs for the
combined Indiana and Kentucky
portions of the Louisville area to be
580.69 tpy for primary PM2.5 and
17,700.95 tpy for NOX. Indiana has
determined the 2025 MVEBs for the
entire Louisville area to be 324.04 tpy
for primary PM2.5 and 9,311.76 tpy for
NOX. These MVEBs exceed the on-road
mobile source primary PM2.5 and NOX
emissions projected by the states for
2015 and 2021. Indiana has decided to
include ‘‘safety margins’’ as provided
for in 40 CFR 93.124(a) (described
below) of 75.74 tpy and 42.27 tpy for
primary PM2.5 and 2,308.82 tpy and
1,214.58 tpy for NOX in the 2015 and
2025 MVEBs, respectively, to provide
for on-road mobile source growth.
Indiana did not provide emission
budgets for SO2, VOCs, and ammonia
because it concluded that emissions of
these precursors from on-road motor
vehicles are not significant contributors
to the area’s PM2.5 air quality problem.
In the Indiana portion of the
Louisville area, the motor vehicle
budgets including the safety margins
and motor vehicle emission projections
for both NOX and PM2.5 are lower than
the levels in the attainment year.
EPA has reviewed the submitted
budgets for 2015 and 2025 including the
added safety margins using the
conformity rule’s adequacy criteria
found at 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4) and the
conformity rule’s requirements for
safety margins found at 40 CFR
93.124(a). EPA has also completed a
thorough review of the maintenance
plan for the Indiana portion of the
Louisville area. Based on the results of
this review of the budgets and the
maintenance plans EPA is approving the
2015 and 2025 direct PM2.5 and NOX
budgets including the requested safety
margins for the Indiana portion of the
Louisville area. Additionally, EPA,
through this rulemaking, has found the
submitted budgets to be adequate for
use to determine transportation
conformity in the Indiana portion of the
area, because EPA has determined that
the area can maintain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS for the relevant
maintenance period with on-road
mobile source emissions at the levels of
the MVEBs including the requested
safety margins. These budgets must be
used in conformity determinations
made on or after the effective date of
this direct final rulemaking (40 CFR
93.118(f)(iii)). Additionally,
transportation conformity
determinations made after the effective
date of this notice must be based on
regional emissions analyses using
MOVES2010a or a more recent version
of MOVES that has been approved for
use in conformity determinations.15
14 EPA described the circumstances under which
an area would be required to use MOVES in
transportation conformity determinations in its
March 2, 2010, Federal Register notice officially
releasing MOVES2010 for use in SIPs and
transportation conformity determinations. (75 FR
9413)
15 EPA described the circumstances under which
an area would be required to use MOVES in
transportation conformity determinations in its
March 2, 2010 Federal Register notice officially
releasing MOVES2010 for use in SIPs and
transportation conformity determinations. (75 FR
9413)
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
2. What is a safety margin?
A ‘‘safety margin’’ is the difference
between the attainment level of
emissions (from all sources) and the
projected level of emissions (from all
sources) in the maintenance plan. As
shown in Table 8, the entire Louisville
area is projected to have safety margins
for NOX and direct PM2.5 of 38,078.76
tpy and 1,668.41 tpy in 2025 (the
difference between the attainment year,
2008, emissions and the projected year
of 2025 emissions for all sources in the
Louisville area). The transportation
conformity rule allows areas to allocate
all or a portion of a ‘‘safety margin’’ to
the area’s motor vehicle emissions
budgets (40 CFR 92.124(a)). The MVEBs
requested by Indiana contain NOX safety
margins for mobile sources in 2015 and
2025 and PM2.5 safety margins for
mobile sources in 2015 and 2025 are
much smaller than the allowable safety
margins reflected in the total emissions
for the Louisville area. The state is not
requesting allocation to the MVEBs of
the entire available safety margins
reflected in the demonstration of
maintenance. Therefore, even though
the state is requesting MVEBs that
exceed the projected on-road mobile
source emissions for 2015 and 2025
contained in the demonstration of
maintenance, the increase in on-road
mobile source emissions that can be
considered for transportation
conformity purposes is well within the
safety margins of the overall PM2.5
maintenance demonstration.
Therefore, EPA believes that the
requested budgets, including the
requested portion of the safety margins,
provide for a quantity of mobile source
emissions that would be expected to
maintain the PM2.5 standard. Once
allocated to mobile sources, these
portions of the safety margins will not
be available for use by other sources.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. What action is EPA taking on the
submitted motor vehicle emissions
budgets?
EPA, through this rulemaking, has
found adequate and is approving the
MVEBs for use to determine
transportation conformity in the Indiana
portion of the Louisville area, because
EPA has determined that the area can
maintain attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS for the relevant
maintenance period with mobile source
emissions at the levels of the MVEBs
including the requested safety margins.
These budgets must be used in
conformity determinations if this
rulemaking goes final. (40 CFR
93.118(f)(iii)) Additionally, the
determinations must be based on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
regional emissions analyses using
MOVES2010b or a more recent version
of MOVES that has been approved for
use in conformity determinations.16
6. 2008 Comprehensive Emissions
Inventory
As discussed above, section 172(c)(3)
of the CAA requires areas to submit a
comprehensive emissions inventory.
Indiana submitted a 2008 base year
emissions inventory that meets this
requirement. Emissions contained in the
submittals cover the general source
categories of point sources, area sources,
on-road mobile sources, and nonroad
mobile sources. Discussion of how these
emissions were compiled is found in
section V(3)(b) above, as well as in the
docket.
The emissions for the 2008 base year
emission inventory and supplemental
precursor emissions inventory are found
in Tables 4 and 5, and documented in
Indiana’s redesignation request
submittal and supplemental submittal.
EPA has reviewed Indiana’s
documentation of the emissions
inventory techniques and data sources
used for the derivation of the 2008
emissions estimates, and has found that
Indiana has thoroughly documented the
derivation of these emissions
inventories. The submittal from the state
shows that the 2008 emissions
inventory is currently the most
complete emissions inventories for
PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors in the
Louisville area. Based upon EPA’s
review, we propose to find that the base
year emissions inventory are as
complete and accurate as possible given
the input data available to Indiana, and
we are proposing to approve them under
CAA section 172(c)(3).
7. Summary of Proposed Actions
EPA has previously determined that
the Louisville area has attained the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is proposing
to determine that the entire Louisville
area continues to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard using the latest three
years of certified, quality-assured data,
and that the Indiana portion of the area
has met the requirements for
redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E)
of the CAA. EPA is proposing to grant
the request from Indiana to change the
legal designation of the Indiana portion
of the Louisville area from
nonattainment to attainment for the
16 EPA described the circumstances under which
an area would be required to use MOVES in
transportation conformity determinations in its
March 2, 2010, Federal Register notice officially
releasing MOVES2010 for use in SIPs and
transportation conformity determinations. (75 FR
9413)
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41751
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is
proposing to approve Indiana’s PM2.5
maintenance plan for the Louisville area
as a revision to the Indiana SIP because
the plan meets the requirements of
section 175A of the CAA. EPA is
proposing to approve the 2008
emissions inventory for primary PM2.5,
NOX, SO2, VOC and ammonia
documented in Indiana’s June 16, 2011,
submittal and supplement on March 18,
2013, as satisfying the requirement in
section 172(c)(3) of the CAA for a
comprehensive, current emission
inventory. Finally, EPA finds adequate
and is approving 2015 and 2025 primary
PM2.5 and NOX MVEBs for the
Louisville area. These MVEBs will be
used in future transportation conformity
analyses for the area.
VI. What are the effects of EPA’s
proposed actions?
If finalized, approval of the
redesignation request would change the
official designation of the Indiana
portion of the Louisville area for the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, found at 40
CFR part 81, from nonattainment to
attainment. A final approval would also
be a revision to the Indiana SIP for the
Louisville area, the maintenance plan
for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard,
MVEBs, as well as the 2008 emissions
inventory included with the
redesignation request.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a
maintenance plan under section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
create any new requirements, but rather
results in the applicability of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, these actions:
• Are not a ’’significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
41752
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 133 / Thursday, July 11, 2013 / Proposed Rules
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Are not economically significant
regulatory actions based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, Environmental
protection, National Parks, Wilderness.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013–16659 Filed 7–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:07 Jul 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0337 and EPA–R05–
OAR–2012–0462; FRL–9831–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;
Redesignation of the Ohio Portion of
the Steubenville-Weirton Area to
Attainment of the 1997 Annual and
2006 24-Hour Standards for Fine
Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On April 16, 2012, and May
25, 2012, the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency submitted a request
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
for EPA to grant the redesignation of the
Ohio portion of the SteubenvilleWeirton area (Jefferson County), West
Virginia-Ohio (Brooke and Hancock
counties) (WV–OH), nonattainment area
to attainment of the 1997 annual and
2006 24-hour standards for fine
particulate matter (PM2.5). EPA is
proposing to determine that the entire
Steubenville-Weirton area attains both
the 1997 annual and the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 standard, based on the most
recent three years of certified air quality
data. EPA is proposing to approve, as
revisions to the Ohio state
implementation plan (SIP), the state’s
plan for maintaining the 1997 annual
and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS or standard) through 2025 in
the Ohio portion of the area. EPA is
proposing to approve 2005 and 2008
emission inventories for the Ohio
portion of the Steubenville-Weirton area
as meeting the comprehensive
emissions inventory requirement of the
CAA. In this proposal, EPA is also
proposing to approve a supplement to
the emission inventories previously
submitted by the state. EPA is proposing
that the inventories for ammonia and
volatile organic compounds (VOC), in
conjunction with the inventories for
nitrogen oxides (NOX), direct PM2.5, and
sulfur dioxide (SO2) that EPA
previously proposed to approve, meet
the comprehensive emissions inventory
requirement of the CAA. Ohio’s
maintenance plan submission includes
a motor vehicle emission budget
(MVEB) for the mobile source
contribution of PM2.5 and NOX to the
Steubenville-Weirton area for
transportation conformity purposes;
EPA is proposing to approve the MVEBs
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for 2015 and 2025 into the Ohio SIP for
transportation conformity purposes.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2012–0337 or EPA–R05–OAR–
2012–0462, by one of the following
methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief,
Control Strategies Section (AR–18J),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Control Strategies Section (AR–
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Regional
Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–
0337 or EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0462.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 133 (Thursday, July 11, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41735-41752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16659]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0698; FRL-9831-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Redesignation of the Indiana Portion of the Louisville Area to
Attainment of the 1997 Annual Standard for Fine Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 16, 2011, the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) submitted a request for EPA to approve the
redesignation of the Indiana portion of the Louisville (KY-IN) (Madison
Township, Jefferson County and Clark and Floyd Counties) nonattainment
area to attainment of the 1997 annual standard for fine particulate
matter (PM2.5). EPA is proposing to determine that the
entire Louisville area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5
standard, based on the most recent three years of certified air quality
data. EPA is proposing to approve, as revisions to the Indiana state
implementation plan (SIP), the state's plan for maintaining the 1997
annual PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS or
standard) through 2025 in the area. EPA is proposing to approve the
2008 emissions inventory for the Indiana portion of the Louisville area
as meeting the comprehensive emissions inventory requirement of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). Indiana's maintenance plan submission
includes motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for the mobile source
contribution of PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides (NOX)
in the Louisville area for transportation conformity purposes; EPA is
proposing to approve the MVEBs for 2015 and 2025 into the Indiana SIP
for transportation conformity purposes. In this proposal, EPA is also
proposing to approve a supplement to the emission inventories
previously submitted by the state. EPA is proposing that the
inventories for ammonia and volatile organic compounds (VOC), in
conjunction with the inventories for NOX, direct
PM2.5, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) that EPA
previously proposed to approve, meet the comprehensive emissions
inventory requirement of the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 12, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2011-0698, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692-2450.
4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section
(AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2011-0698. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to section I of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
[[Page 41736]]
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
We recommend that you telephone Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, at (312) 353-8290 before visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Persoon, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8290, persoon.carolyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This supplementary information section is
arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
II. What actions is EPA proposing to take?
III. What is the background for these actions?
IV. What are the criteria for redesignation to attainment?
V. What is EPA's analysis of the State's request?
1. Attainment (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i))
2. The Area Has Met All Applicable Requirements under Section
110 and Part D and Has a Fully Approved SIP Under Section 110(k)
(Sections 107(d)(3)(E)(v) and 107(d)(3)(E)(ii))
3. The Improvement in Air Quality Is Due to Permanent and
Enforceable Reductions in Emissions Resulting from Implementation of
the SIP and Applicable Federal Air Pollution Control Regulations and
Other Permanent and Enforceable Reductions (Section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii))
4. Indiana Has a Fully Approved Maintenance Plan Pursuant to
Section 175A of the CAA (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv))
5. Adequacy of Indiana's MVEB
6. 2008 Comprehensive Emissions Inventory
7. Summary of Proposed Actions
VI. What are the effects of EPA's proposed actions?
VII. Statutory and Executive order reviews.
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
When submitting comments, remember to:
1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
2. Follow directions--EPA may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
3. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
4. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
6. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
7. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
8. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. What actions is EPA proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to take several actions related to redesignation
of the Indiana portion of the Louisville area to attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. In addition to EPA's March 9, 2011,
determination that the area attained the 1997 annual NAAQS for
PM2.5 by the applicable attainment date based on quality-
assured, certified 2007-2009 ambient air monitoring data (76 FR 12860),
we are proposing to determine that the area continues to attain the
NAAQS for PM2.5, based monitoring data for 2009-2011 and
2010-2012 shows that the area continues to attain. EPA is proposing to
find that Indiana meets the requirements for redesignation of the
Louisville area to attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS under
section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.
Second, EPA is proposing to approve Indiana's annual
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Louisville area as a revision
to the Indiana SIP, including the MVEBs for PM2.5 and
NOX emissions for the mobile source contribution of the
Louisville area.
Finally, EPA is proposing to approve 2008 primary PM2.5,
NOX, SO2, VOC, and ammonia emissions inventories
as satisfying the requirement in section 172(c)(3) of the CAA for a
current, accurate and comprehensive emission inventory. In a
supplemental submission to EPA on March 18, 2013, IDEM submitted
ammonia and VOC emissions inventories to supplement the emissions
inventories that had previously been submitted.
In this proposed redesignation, EPA takes into account two
decisions of the D.C. Circuit Court (referred to as ``the D.C.
Circuit'' or ``the Court''). In the first of the two court decisions,
the D.C. Circuit, on August 21, 2012, issued EME Homer City Generation,
L.P. v. EPA, 696 F.3d 7 (D.C. Cir. 2012, no. 11-1302 and consolidated
cases) (referred to as ``EME Homer City,'') which vacated and remanded
the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) and ordered EPA to continue
administering the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) ``pending . . .
development of a valid replacement.'' EME Homer City at 38. The D.C.
Circuit denied all petitions for rehearing on January 24, 2013. In the
second decision, on January 4, 2013, in Natural Resources Defense
Council v. EPA, the D.C. Circuit remanded to EPA the ``Final Clean Air
Fine Particle Implementation Rule'' (72 FR 20586, April 25, 2007) and
the ``Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR) Program for
Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)'' final
rule (73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008). 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013).
EPA is proposing to approve the request from the state of Indiana
to change the designation of Marion Township, Jefferson County and
Clark and Floyd Counties (the Indiana portion of the Louisville area)
from nonattainment to attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5
NAAQS. This action would not change the legal designation of the
Kentucky portion of the area, which would be addressed in a separate
rulemaking.
III. What is the background for these actions?
Fine particulate pollution can be emitted directly from a source
(primary PM2.5) or formed secondarily through chemical
reactions in the atmosphere involving precursor pollutants emitted from
a variety of sources. Sulfates are a type of secondary particulate
formed from SO2 emissions from power plants and industrial
facilities. Nitrates, another common type of secondary particulate, are
formed from combustion emissions of NOX from power plants,
mobile sources and other combustion sources.
The first air quality standards for PM2.5 were
promulgated on July 18, 1997, at 62 FR 38652. EPA promulgated an annual
standard at a level of 15 micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\) of
ambient air, based on a three-year average of the annual mean
PM2.5 concentrations at each monitoring site. In the same
rulemaking, EPA promulgated a 24-hour PM2.5 standard at
[[Page 41737]]
65 [mu]g/m\3\, based on a three-year average of the 98th percentile of
24-hour PM2.5 concentrations at each monitoring site.
On January 5, 2005, at 70 FR 944, EPA published air quality area
designations for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard based on air
quality data for calendar years 2001-2003. In that rulemaking, EPA
designated the Louisville area as nonattainment for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard.
On October 17, 2006, at 71 FR 61144, EPA retained the annual
PM2.5 standard at 15 [micro]g/m\3\ (2006 annual
PM2.5 standard), but revised the 24-hour standard to 35
[mu]g/m\3\, based again on the three-year average of the annual 98th
percentile of the 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations. In response
to legal challenges of the 2006 annual PM2.5 standard, the
D.C. Circuit remanded this standard to EPA for further consideration.
See American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers
Council, et al. v. EPA, 559 F.3d 512 (D.C. Cir. 2009). On December 14,
2012, EPA finalized a rule revising the PM2.5 annual
standard to 12 [mu]g/m\3\ based on current scientific evidence
regarding the protection of public health. Since the Louisville area is
designated as nonattainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5
standard, today's proposed action addresses redesignation to attainment
only for this standard.
On March 9, 2011, EPA issued a final determination that the entire
Louisville area attained the 1997 PM2.5 standard by the
applicable attainment date (76 FR 12860). Indiana's original submittal
contained complete, quality-assured and certified air monitoring data
for years 2008-2010. Based upon our review of complete, quality-assured
and certified ambient air monitoring data from 2009-2011, we are
proposing to determine that the area continues to attain the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Further, recently state certified data
for 2012 indicate that the area continues to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS.
IV. What are the criteria for redesignation to attainment?
The CAA sets forth the requirements for redesignating a
nonattainment area to attainment. Specifically, section 107(d)(3)(E) of
the CAA allows for redesignation provided that: (1) The Administrator
determines that the area has attained the applicable NAAQS based on
current air quality data; (2) the Administrator has fully approved an
applicable SIP for the area under section 110(k) of the CAA; (3) the
Administrator determines that the improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable emission reductions resulting from
implementation of the applicable SIP, Federal air pollution control
regulations and other permanent and enforceable emission reductions;
(4) the Administrator has fully approved a maintenance plan for the
area meeting the requirements of section 175A of the CAA; and (5) the
state containing the area has met all requirements applicable to the
area for purposes of redesignation under section 110 and part D of the
CAA.
V. What is EPA's analysis of the State's request?
EPA is proposing to grant the redesignation of the Indiana portion
of the Louisville area to attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS and is proposing to approve Indiana's
maintenance plan for the area and other related SIP revisions. The
bases for these actions follow.
1. Attainment (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i))
As noted above, in a rulemaking published on March 9, 2011, EPA
determined that the Louisville area attained the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date. The basis and
effect of this determination were discussed in the proposed (75 FR
55725) and final (76 FR 12860) actions. The determination was based on
certified quality-assured air quality monitoring data for 2007-2009
showing the area had met the standard by the attainment date. In this
action, we are proposing to determine that the Louisville area has
attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS based upon the most
recent three years of complete, certified and quality-assured data, as
required by section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. Under EPA's regulations at
40 CFR 50.7, the annual primary and secondary PM2.5
standards are met when the annual arithmetic mean concentration, as
determined in accordance with 40 CFR part 50, appendix N, is less than
or equal to 15.0 [mu]g/m\3\ at all relevant monitoring sites in the
area.
EPA has reviewed the ambient air quality monitoring data in the
Louisville area, consistent with the requirements contained at 40 CFR
part 50. EPA's review focused on data recorded in the EPA Air Quality
System (AQS) database for the Louisville PM2.5 nonattainment
area from 2009-2011, and 2010-2012. EPA also considered preliminary
data for 2012, for which EPA has not yet calculated design values.
The Louisville area has seven monitors that are located in Clark
and Floyd counties, Indiana, and Jefferson County, Kentucky. Recently
certified state monitored data has been used to calculate design value
from 2010-2012 for PM2.5 that ranged 11.0-13.2 [mu]g/m\3\
for the 1997 annual standard. The monitors in the Louisville area
recorded complete data in accordance with criteria set forth by EPA in
40 CFR part 50, appendix N, where a complete year of air quality data
comprises four calendar quarters, with each quarter containing data
with at least 75% capture of the scheduled sampling days. Available
data are considered to be sufficient for comparison to the NAAQS if
three consecutive complete years of data exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As defined in 40 CFR part 50, appendix N(1)(c).
Table 1--The 1997 Annual PM2.5 Design Values for the Louisville Monitor With Complete Data for the 2009-2011 and
2010-2012 Design Values \1\ in [mu]g/m\3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Annual
standard standard
County Site design value design value
2009-2011 2010-2012
([mu]g/m\3\) ([mu]g/m\3\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clark County, IN................................................ 180190006 13.5 13.2
Clark County, IN................................................ 180190008 11.4 11.0
Floyd County, IN................................................ 180431004 12.3 11.8
Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110043 12.6 11.8
Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110044 12.8 12.1
Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110051 12.7 12.3
Jefferson County, KY............................................ 211110067 12.1 11.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 41738]]
EPA's review of monitoring data from the 2009-2011 and 2010-2012
monitoring periods supports EPA's determination that the Louisville
area has monitored attainment. EPA proposes to determine that the
Louisville area has attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard.
2. The Area Has Met All Applicable Requirements Under Section 110 and
Part D and Has a Fully Approved SIP Under Section 110(k) (Sections
107(d)(3)(E)(v) and 107(d)(3)(E)(ii))
We have determined that Indiana's SIP meets all applicable SIP
requirements for purposes of redesignation for the Louisville area
under section 110 of the CAA for purposes of redesignation in
accordance with section 107(d)(3)(E)(v). In addition, with the
exception of the emissions inventory under section 172(c)(3), we have
previously approved all applicable requirements of the Indiana SIP for
purposes of redesignation, in accordance with section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii).
As discussed below, in this action EPA is approving Indiana's 2008
emissions inventory as meeting the section 172(c)(3) comprehensive
emissions inventory requirement.
In making these determinations, we have ascertained which SIP
requirements are applicable to the area for purposes of redesignation,
and have determined that they are fully approved under section 110(k)
of the CAA.
a. The Louisville Area Has Met All Applicable Requirements for Purposes
of Redesignation Under Section 110 and Part D of the CAA
i. Section 110 General SIP Requirements
Section 110(a) of title I of the CAA contains the general
requirements for a SIP. Section 110(a)(2) provides that the
implementation plan submitted by a state must have been adopted by the
state after reasonable public notice and hearing, and, among other
things, must: Include enforceable emission limitations and other
control measures, means or techniques necessary to meet the
requirements of the CAA; provide for establishment and operation of
appropriate devices, methods, systems, and procedures necessary to
monitor ambient air quality; provide for implementation of a source
permit program to regulate the modification and construction of any
stationary source within the areas covered by the plan; include
provisions for the implementation of part C, Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) and part D, NSR permit programs; include criteria
for stationary source emission control measures, monitoring, and
reporting; include provisions for air quality modeling; and provide for
public and local agency participation in planning and emission control
rule development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) of the CAA requires that SIPs contain measures
to prevent sources in a state from significantly contributing to air
quality problems in another state. EPA believes that the requirements
linked with a particular nonattainment area's designation and
classification are the relevant measures to evaluate in reviewing a
redesignation request. The transport SIP submittal requirements, where
applicable, continue to apply to a state regardless of the designation
of any one particular area in the state. Thus, we believe that these
requirements should not be construed to be applicable requirements for
purposes of redesignation.
Further, we believe that the other section 110 elements described
above that are not connected with nonattainment plan submissions and
not linked with an area's attainment status are also not applicable
requirements for purposes of redesignation. A state remains subject to
these requirements after an area is redesignated to attainment. We
conclude that only the section 110 and part D requirements that are
linked with a particular area's designation and classification are the
relevant measures which we may consider in evaluating a redesignation
request. This approach is consistent with EPA's existing policy on
applicability of conformity and oxygenated fuels requirements for
redesignation purposes, as well as with section 184 ozone transport
requirements. See Reading, Pennsylvania, proposed and final rulemakings
(61 FR 53174-53176 (October 10, 1996)) and (62 FR 24826 (May 7, 1997));
Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio, final rulemaking (61 FR 20458 (May 7,
1996)); and Tampa, Florida, final rulemaking (60 FR 62748 (December 7,
1995)). See also the discussion on this issue in the Cincinnati, Ohio
1-hour ozone redesignation (65 FR 37890 (June 19, 2000)), and in the
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 1-hour ozone redesignation (66 FR 50399
(October 19, 2001)).
We have reviewed Indiana's SIP and have concluded that it meets the
general SIP requirements under section 110 of the CAA to the extent
they are applicable for purposes of redesignation. EPA has previously
approved provisions into the Indiana SIP addressing section 110
elements under particulate standards (40 CFR 52.770). On December 7,
2007, September 9, 2008, March 23, 2011, and April 7, 2011, Indiana
made submittals addressing ``infrastructure SIP'' elements required by
section 110(a)(2) of the CAA. EPA approved elements of Indiana's
submittals on July 13, 2011, at 76 FR 41075. The requirements of
section 110(a)(2), however, are statewide requirements that are not
linked to the PM2.5 nonattainment status of the Louisville
area. Therefore, EPA believes that these SIP elements are not
applicable requirements for purposes of review of the state's
PM2.5 redesignation request.
ii. Part D Requirements
EPA has determined that, upon approval of the base year emissions
inventories discussed in section IV.C. of this rulemaking, the Indiana
SIP will meet the applicable SIP requirements for the Louisville area
applicable for purposes of redesignation under part D of the CAA.
Subpart 1 of part D, found in sections 172-176 of the CAA, sets forth
the basic nonattainment requirements applicable to all nonattainment
areas.
1. Subpart 1
(a) Section 172 Requirements.
For purposes of evaluating this redesignation request, the
applicable section 172 SIP requirements for the Louisville area are
contained in sections 172(c)(1)-(9). A thorough discussion of the
requirements contained in section 172 can be found in the General
Preamble for Implementation of Title I (57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992).
Section 172(c)(1) requires the plans for all nonattainment areas to
provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control
measures (RACM) as expeditiously as practicable and to provide for
attainment of the primary NAAQS. EPA interprets this requirement to
impose a duty on all nonattainment areas to consider all available
control measures and to adopt and implement such measures that are
reasonably available for implementation in each area as components of
the area's attainment demonstration. Because the Louisville area has
reached attainment, Indiana does not need to address additional
measures to provide for attainment, and section 172(c)(1) requirements
are no longer considered to be applicable as long as the area continues
to attain the standard until redesignation. These requirements were
suspended with the previous action (76 FR 12860) that determined
attainment of the standard, as discussed above.
[[Page 41739]]
The reasonable further progress (RFP) requirement under section
172(c)(2) is defined as progress that must be made toward attainment.
This requirement is not relevant for purposes of redesignation because
the Louisville area has monitored attainment of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. (``General Preamble for the Interpretation of
Title I of the CAA Amendments of 1990''; (57 FR 13498, 13564, April 16,
1992)). See also 40 CFR 51.918. The requirement to submit the section
172(c)(9) contingency measures is similarly not applicable for purposes
of redesignation. Id.
Section 172(c)(3) requires submission and approval of a
comprehensive, accurate and current inventory of actual emissions.
Indiana submitted a 2008 base year emissions inventory along with the
redesignation request. As discussed below in section IV.C., EPA is
approving the 2008 inventory as meeting the section 172(c)(3) emissions
inventory requirement for the Louisville area.
Section 172(c)(4) requires the identification and quantification of
allowable emissions for major new and modified stationary sources in an
area, and section 172(c)(5) requires source permits for the
construction and operation of new and modified major stationary sources
anywhere in the nonattainment area. EPA approved Indiana's current part
D (nonattainment) NSR program on October 7, 1994 (59 FR 51108).
Nonetheless, since PSD requirements will apply after redesignation, the
area need not have a fully-approved part D NSR program for purposes of
redesignation, provided that the area demonstrates maintenance of the
NAAQS without part D NSR. A detailed rationale for this view is
described in a memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator
for Air and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994, entitled, ``Part D New
Source Review Requirements for Areas Requesting Redesignation to
Attainment.'' Indiana has demonstrated that the Louisville area will be
able to maintain the standard without part D NSR in effect; therefore,
the state need not have a fully approved part D NSR program prior to
approval of the redesignation request. The state's PSD program will
become effective in the Louisville area upon redesignation to
attainment. See rulemakings for Detroit, Michigan (60 FR 12467-12468,
March 7, 1995); Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio (61 FR 20458, 20469-20470,
May 7, 1996); Louisville, Kentucky (66 FR 53665, October 23, 2001); and
Grand Rapids, Michigan (61 FR 31834-31837, June 21, 1996).
Section 172(c)(6) requires the SIP to contain control measures
necessary to provide for attainment of the standard. Because attainment
has been reached, no additional measures are needed to provide for
attainment.
Section 172(c)(7) requires the SIP to meet the applicable
provisions of section 110(a)(2). As noted above, we believe the Indiana
SIP meets the section 110(a)(2) requirements applicable for purposes of
redesignation.
(b) Section 176 Conformity Requirements.
Section 176(c) of the CAA requires states to establish criteria and
procedures to ensure that Federally-supported or funded activities,
including highway projects, conform to the air quality planning goals
in the applicable SIPs. The requirement to determine conformity applies
to transportation plans, programs and projects developed, funded or
approved under title 23 of the U.S. Code and the Federal Transit Act
(``transportation conformity'') as well as to all other Federally-
supported or funded projects (``general conformity''). State
transportation conformity regulations must be consistent with Federal
conformity regulations relating to consultation, enforcement, and
enforceability, which EPA promulgated pursuant to CAA requirements.
EPA approved Indiana's general and transportation conformity SIPs
on January 14, 1998 (63 FR 2146), and August 17, 2010 (75 FR 50730),
respectively. Section 176(c) of the CAA was amended by provisions
contained in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEALU), which was signed into law
on August 10, 2005 (Pub. L. 109-59). In adopting this revision to the
CAA, Congress streamlined the requirements for state conformity SIPs.
Indiana is in the process of updating its transportation conformity SIP
to meet these new requirements.
Indiana has submitted on-road MVEBs for the Louisville area of
580.69 tons per year (tpy) and 324.04 tpy of primary PM2.5
and 17,700.95 tpy and 9,311.76 tpy of NOX for the years 2015
and 2025, respectively. The area must use the MVEBs from the
maintenance plan in any conformity determination that is made on or
after the effective date of the adequacy finding and maintenance plan
approval.
2. Effect of the January 4, 2013, D.C. Circuit Decision Regarding PM2.5
Implementation Under Subpart 4
a. Background
As discussed above, on January 4, 2013, in Natural Resources
Defense Council v. EPA, the DC Circuit remanded to EPA the ``Final
Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule'' (72 FR 20586, April 25,
2007) and the ``Implementation of the New Source Review (NSR) Program
for Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5)''
final rule (73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008) (collectively, ``1997
PM2.5 Implementation Rule''). 706 F.3d 428 (DC Cir. 2013).
The Court found that EPA erred in implementing the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS pursuant to the general implementation
provisions of subpart 1 of part D of title I of the CAA, rather than
the particulate-matter-specific provisions of subpart 4 of part D of
title I.
b. Proposal on This Issue
As explained below, EPA is proposing to determine that the Court's
January 4, 2013, decision does not prevent EPA from redesignating the
Louisville area to attainment. Even in light of the Court's decision,
redesignation for this area is appropriate under the CAA and EPA's
longstanding interpretations of the CAA's provisions regarding
redesignation. EPA'slongstanding interpretation that requirements that
are imposed, or that become due, after a complete redesignation request
is submitted for an area that is attaining the standard, are not
applicable for purposes of evaluating a redesignation request. Second,
even if EPA applies the subpart 4 requirements to the Louisville
redesignation request and disregards the provisions of its 1997
PM2.5 implementation rule recently remanded by the Court,
the state's request for redesignation of this area still qualifies for
approval.
i. Applicable Requirements for Purposes of Evaluating the Redesignation
Request
With respect to the 1997 PM2.5 implementation rule, the
Court's January 4, 2013, ruling rejected EPA's reasons for implementing
the PM2.5 NAAQS solely in accordance with the provisions of
subpart 1, and remanded that matter to EPA, so that it could address
implementation of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS under subpart 4 of
part D of the CAA, in addition to subpart 1. For the purposes of
evaluating Indiana's redesignation request for the area, to the extent
that implementation under subpart 4 would impose additional
requirements for areas designated
[[Page 41740]]
nonattainment, EPA believes that those requirements are not
``applicable'' for the purposes of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E), and thus
EPA is not required to consider subpart 4 requirements with respect to
the Louisville redesignation. Under its longstanding interpretation of
the CAA, EPA has interpreted section 107(d)(3)(E) to mean, as a
threshold matter, that the part D provisions which are ``applicable''
and which must be approved in order for EPA to redesignate an area
include only those which came due prior to a state's submittal of a
complete redesignation request. See ``Procedures for Processing
Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment,'' Memorandum from John
Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, September 4, 1992
(Calcagni memorandum). See also ``State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Requirements for Areas Submitting Requests for Redesignation to
Attainment of the Ozone and Carbon Monoxide (CO) NAAQS on or after
November 15, 1992,'' Memorandum from Michael Shapiro, Acting Assistant
Administrator, Air and Radiation, September 17, 1993 (Shapiro
memorandum); Final Redesignation of Detroit-Ann Arbor, (60 FR 12459,
12465-66, March 7, 1995); Final Redesignation of St. Louis, Missouri,
(68 FR 25418, 25424-27, May 12, 2003); Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.3d
537, 541 (7th Cir. 2004) (upholding EPA's redesignation rulemaking
applying this interpretation and expressly rejecting Sierra Club's view
that the meaning of ``applicable'' under the statute is ``whatever
should have been in the plan at the time of attainment rather than
whatever actually was in the plan and already implemented or due at the
time of attainment'').\2\ In this case, at the time that Indiana
submitted its redesignation request, requirements under subpart 4 were
not due,[and indeed, were not yet known to apply.]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Applicable requirements of the CAA that come due subsequent
to the area's submittal of a complete redesignation request remain
applicable until a redesignation is approved, but are not required
as a prerequisite to redesignation. Section 175A(c) of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA's view that, for purposes of evaluating the Louisville
redesignation, the subpart 4 requirements were not due at the time the
state submitted the redesignation request is in keeping with the EPA's
interpretation of subpart 2 requirements for subpart 1 ozone areas
redesignated subsequent to the D.C. Circuit's decision in South Coast
Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006). In South
Coast, the Court found that EPA was not permitted to implement the 1997
8-hour ozone standard solely under subpart 1, and held that EPA was
required under the statute to implement the standard under the ozone-
specific requirements of subpart 2 as well. Subsequent to the South
Coast decision, in evaluating and acting upon redesignation requests
for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard that were submitted to EPA for areas
under subpart 1, EPA applied its longstanding interpretation of the CAA
that ``applicable requirements'', for purposes of evaluating a
redesignation, are those that had been due at the time the
redesignation request was submitted. See, e.g., Proposed Redesignation
of Manitowoc County and Door County Nonattainment Areas (75 FR 22047,
22050, April 27, 2010). In those actions, EPA therefore did not
consider subpart 2 requirements to be ``applicable'' for the purposes
of evaluating whether the area should be redesignated under section
107(d)(3)(E).
EPA's interpretation derives from the provisions of CAA Section
107(d)(3). Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) states that, for an area to be
redesignated, a state must meet ``all requirements `applicable' to the
area under section 110 and part D''. Section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) provides
that the EPA must have fully approved the ``applicable'' SIP for the
area seeking redesignation. These two sections read together support
EPA's interpretation of ``applicable'' as only those requirements that
came due prior to submission of a complete redesignation request.
First, holding states to an ongoing obligation to adopt new CAA
requirements that arose after the state submitted its redesignation
request, in order to be redesignated, would make it problematic or
impossible for EPA to act on redesignation requests in accordance with
the 18-month deadline Congress set for EPA action in section
107(d)(3)(D). If ``applicable requirements'' were interpreted to be a
continuing flow of requirements with no reasonable limitation, states,
after submitting a redesignation request, would be forced continuously
to make additional SIP submissions that in turn would require EPA to
undertake further notice-and-comment rulemaking actions to act on those
submissions. This would create a regime of unceasing rulemaking that
would delay action on the redesignation request beyond the 18-month
timeframe provided by the CAA for this purpose.
Second, a fundamental premise for redesignating a nonattainment
area to attainment is that the area has attained the relevant NAAQS due
to emission reductions from existing controls. Thus, an area for which
a redesignation request has been submitted would have already attained
the NAAQS as a result of satisfying statutory requirements that came
due prior to the submission of the request. Absent a showing that
unadopted and unimplemented requirements are necessary for future
maintenance, it is reasonable to view the requirements applicable for
purposes of evaluating the redesignation request as including only
those SIP requirements that have already come due. These are the
requirements that led to attainment of the NAAQS. To require, for
redesignation approval, that a state also satisfy additional SIP
requirements coming due after the state submits its complete
redesignation request, and while EPA is reviewing it, would compel the
state to do more than is necessary to attain the NAAQS, without a
showing that the additional requirements are necessary for maintenance.
In the context of this redesignation, the timing and nature of the
Court's January 4, 2013, decision in NRDC v. EPA compound the
consequences of imposing requirements that come due after the
redesignation request is submitted. The state submitted its
redesignation request on June 16, 2011, but the Court did not issue its
decision remanding EPA's 1997 PM2.5 implementation rule
concerning the applicability of the provisions of subpart 4 until
January 2013.
To require the state's fully-completed and pending redesignation
request to comply now with requirements of subpart 4 that the Court
announced only in January, 2013, would be to give retroactive effect to
such requirements when the state had no notice that it was required to
meet them. The D.C. Circuit recognized the inequity of this type of
retroactive impact in Sierra Club v. Whitman, 285 F.3d 63 (D.C. Cir.
2002),\3\ where it upheld the District Court's ruling refusing to make
retroactive EPA's determination that the St. Louis area did not meet
its attainment deadline. In that case, petitioners urged the Court to
make EPA's nonattainment determination effective as of the date that
the statute required, rather than the later date on which EPA actually
made the determination. The Court rejected this view, stating that
applying it ``would likely impose large costs on
[[Page 41741]]
states, which would face fines and suits for not implementing air
pollution prevention plans . . . even though they were not on notice at
the time.'' Id. at 68. Similarly, it would be unreasonable to penalize
Indiana by rejecting its redesignation request for an area that is
already attaining the 1997 PM2.5 standard and that met all
applicable requirements known to be in effect at the time of the
request. For EPA now to reject the redesignation request solely because
the state did not expressly address subpart 4 requirements of which it
had no notice, would inflict the same unfairness condemned by the Court
in Sierra Club v. Whitman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Sierra Club v. Whitman was discussed and distinguished in a
recent D.C. Circuit decision that addressed retroactivity in a quite
different context, where, unlike the situation here, EPA sought to
give its regulations retroactive effect. National Petrochemical and
Refiners Ass'n v. EPA. 630 F.3d 145, 163 (D.C. Cir. 2010), rehearing
denied, 643 F.3d 958 (D.C. Cir. 2011), cert denied, 132 S. Ct. 571
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Subpart 4 Requirements and Indiana Redesignation Request
Even if EPA were to take the view that the Court's January 4, 2013,
decision requires that, in the context of pending redesignations,
subpart 4 requirements were due and in effect at the time the state
submitted its redesignation request, EPA proposes to determine that the
Louisville area still qualifies for redesignation to attainment. As
explained below, EPA believes that the redesignation request for the
Louisville area, though not expressed in terms of subpart 4
requirements, substantively meets the requirements of that subpart for
purposes of redesignating the area to attainment.
With respect to evaluating the relevant substantive requirements of
subpart 4 for purposes of redesignating the Louisville area, EPA notes
that subpart 4 incorporates components of subpart 1 of part D, which
contains general air quality planning requirements for areas designated
as nonattainment. See Section 172(c). Subpart 4 itself contains
specific planning and scheduling requirements for PM10 \4\
nonattainment areas, and under the Court's January 4, 2013, decision in
NRDC v. EPA, these same statutory requirements also apply for
PM2.5 nonattainment areas. EPA has longstanding general
guidance that interprets the 1990 amendments to the CAA, making
recommendations to states for meeting the statutory requirements for
SIPs for nonattainment areas. See, ``State Implementation Plans;
General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clear Air Act
Amendments of 1990,'' 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992) (the ``General
Preamble''). In the General Preamble, EPA discussed the relationship of
subpart 1 and subpart 4 SIP requirements, and pointed out that subpart
1 requirements were to an extent ``subsumed by, or integrally related
to, the more specific PM10 requirements.'' 57 FR 13538
(April 16, 1992). The subpart 1 requirements include, among other
things, provisions for attainment demonstrations, RACM, RFP, emissions
inventories, and contingency measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ PM10 refers to particulates nominally 10
micrometers in diameter or smaller.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the purposes of this redesignation, in order to identify any
additional requirements which would apply under subpart 4, we are
considering the Louisville area to be a ``moderate'' PM2.5
nonattainment area. Under section 188 of the CAA, all areas designated
nonattainment areas under subpart 4 would initially be classified by
operation of law as ``moderate'' nonattainment areas, and would remain
moderate nonattainment areas unless and until EPA reclassifies the area
as a ``serious'' nonattainment area. Accordingly, EPA believes that it
is appropriate to limit the evaluation of the potential impact of
subpart 4 requirements to those that would be applicable to moderate
nonattainment areas. Sections 189(a) and (c) of subpart 4 apply to
moderate nonattainment areas and include the following: (1) An approved
permit program for construction of new and modified major stationary
sources (section 189(a)(1)(A)); (2) an attainment demonstration
(section 189(a)(1)(B)); (3) provisions for RACM (section 189(a)(1)(C));
and (4) quantitative milestones demonstrating RFP toward attainment by
the applicable attainment date (section 189(c)).
The permit requirements of subpart 4, as contained in section
189(a)(1)(A), refer to and apply the subpart 1 permit provisions
requirements of sections 172 and 173 to PM10, without adding
to them. Consequently, EPA believes that section 189(a)(1)(A) does not
itself impose for redesignation purposes any additional requirements
for moderate areas beyond those contained in subpart 1.\5\ In any
event, in the context of redesignation, EPA has long relied on the
interpretation that a fully approved nonattainment new source review
program is not considered an applicable requirement for redesignation,
provided the area can maintain the standard with a PSD program after
redesignation. A detailed rationale for this view is described in a
memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation, dated October 14, 1994, entitled, ``Part D New Source Review
Requirements for Areas Requesting Redesignation to Attainment.'' See
also rulemakings for Detroit, Michigan (60 FR 12467-12468, March 7,
1995); Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, Ohio (61 FR 20458, 20469-20470, May 7,
1996); Louisville, Kentucky (66 FR 53665, October 23, 2001); and Grand
Rapids, Michigan (61 FR 31834-31837, June 21, 1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The potential effect of section 189(e) on section
189(a)(1)(A) for purposes of evaluating this redesignation is
discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the specific attainment planning requirements under
subpart 4,\6\ when EPA evaluates a redesignation request under either
subpart 1 and/or 4, any area that is attaining the PM2.5
standard is viewed as having satisfied the attainment planning
requirements for these subparts. For redesignations, EPA has for many
years interpreted attainment-linked requirements as not applicable for
areas attaining the standard. In the General Preamble, EPA stated that:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ These are attainment demonstration, RFP, RACM, milestone
requirements, contingency measures.
The requirements for RFP will not apply in evaluating a request
for redesignation to attainment since, at a minimum, the air quality
data for the area must show that the area has already attained.
Showing that the State will make RFP towards attainment will,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
therefore, have no meaning at that point.
``General Preamble for the Interpretation of Title I of the CAA
Amendments of 1990''; (57 FR 13498, 13564, April 16, 1992).
The General Preamble also explained that
[t]he section 172(c)(9) requirements are directed at ensuring RFP
and attainment by the applicable date. These requirements no longer
apply when an area has attained the standard and is eligible for
redesignation. Furthermore, section 175A for maintenance plans . . .
provides specific requirements for contingency measures that
effectively supersede the requirements of section 172(c)(9) for
these areas. Id.
EPA similarly stated in its 1992 Calcagni memorandum that, ``The
requirements for reasonable further progress and other measures needed
for attainment will not apply for redesignations because they only have
meaning for areas not attaining the standard.''
It is evident that even if we were to consider the Court's January
4, 2013, decision in NRDC v. EPA to mean that attainment-related
requirements specific to subpart 4 should be imposed retroactively \7\
and thus are now past due, those requirements do not apply to an area
that is attaining the 1997 PM2.5 standard, for the purpose
of evaluating
[[Page 41742]]
a pending request to redesignate the area to attainment. EPA has
consistently enunciated this interpretation of applicable requirements
under section 107(d)(3)(E) since the General Preamble was published
more than twenty years ago. Courts have recognized the scope of EPA's
authority to interpret ``applicable requirements'' in the redesignation
context. See Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ As EPA has explained above, we do not believe that the
Court's January 4, 2013, decision should be interpreted so as to
impose these requirements on the states retroactively. Sierra Club
v. Whitman, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, even outside the context of redesignations, EPA has
viewed the obligations to submit attainment-related SIP planning
requirements of subpart 4 as inapplicable for areas that EPA determines
are attaining the standard. EPA's prior ``Clean Data Policy''
rulemakings for the PM10 NAAQS, also governed by the
requirements of subpart 4, explain EPA's reasoning. They describe the
effects of a determination of attainment on the attainment-related SIP
planning requirements of subpart 4. See ``Determination of Attainment
for Coso Junction Nonattainment Area,'' (75 FR 27944, May 19, 2010).
See also Coso Junction proposed PM10 redesignation, (75 FR
36023, 36027, June 24, 2010); Proposed and Final Determinations of
Attainment for San Joaquin Nonattainment Area (71 FR 40952, 40954-55,
July 19, 2006; and 71 FR 63641, 63643-47 October 30, 2006). In short,
EPA in this context has also long concluded that to require states to
meet superfluous SIP planning requirements is not necessary and not
required by the CAA, so long as those areas continue to attain the
relevant NAAQS.
Elsewhere in this notice, EPA proposes to determine that the area
has attained the 1997 PM2.5 standard. Under its longstanding
interpretation, EPA is proposing to determine here that the area meets
the attainment-related plan requirements of subparts 1 and 4.
Thus, EPA is proposing to conclude that the requirements to submit
an attainment demonstration under 189(a)(1)(B), a RACM determination
under section 172(c)d section 189(a)(1)(c), a RFP demonstration under
189(c)(1), and contingency measure requirements under section 172(c)(9)
are satisfied for purposes of evaluating the redesignation request.
iii. Subpart 4 and Control of PM2.5 Precursors
The D.C. Circuit in NRDC v. EPA remanded to EPA the two rules at
issue in the case with instructions to EPA to re-promulgate them
consistent with the requirements of subpart 4. EPA in this section
addresses the Court's opinion with respect to PM2.5
precursors. While past implementation of subpart 4 for PM10
has allowed for control of PM10 precursors such as
NOX from major stationary, mobile, and area sources in order
to attain the standard as expeditiously as practicable, CAA section
189(e) specifically provides that control requirements for major
stationary sources of direct PM10 shall also apply to
PM10 precursors from those sources, except where EPA
determines that major stationary sources of such precursors ``do not
contribute significantly to PM10 levels which exceed the
standard in the area.''
EPA's 1997 PM2.5 implementation rule, remanded by the
D.C. Circuit, contained rebuttable presumptions concerning certain
PM2.5 precursors applicable to attainment plans and control
measures related to those plans. Specifically, in 40 CFR 51.1002, EPA
provided, among other things, that a state was ``not required to
address VOC [and ammonia] as . . . PM2.5 attainment plan
precursor[s] and to evaluate sources of VOC [and ammonia] emissions in
the State for control measures.'' EPA intended these to be rebuttable
presumptions. EPA established these presumptions at the time because of
uncertainties regarding the emission inventories for these pollutants
and the effectiveness of specific control measures in various regions
of the country in reducing PM2.5 concentrations. EPA also
left open the possibility for such regulation of VOC and ammonia in
specific areas where that was necessary.
The Court in its January 4, 2013, decision made reference to both
section 189(e) and 40 CFR 51.1002, and stated that, ``In light of our
disposition, we need not address the petitioners' challenge to the
presumptions in [40 CFR 51.1002] that volatile organic compounds and
ammonia are not PM2.5 precursors, as subpart 4 expressly
governs precursor presumptions.'' NRDC v. EPA, at 27, n.10.
Elsewhere in the Court's opinion, however, the Court observed:
Ammonia is a precursor to fine particulate matter, making it a
precursor to both PM2.5 and PM10. For a
PM10 nonattainment area governed by subpart 4, a
precursor is presumptively regulated. See 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7513a(e)
[section 189(e)].
Id. at 21, n.7.
For a number of reasons, EPA believes that its proposed
redesignation of [the area] is consistent with the Court's decision on
this aspect of subpart 4. First, while the Court, citing section
189(e), stated that ``for a PM10 area governed by subpart 4,
a precursor is `presumptively regulated,' '' the Court expressly
declined to decide the specific challenge to EPA's 1997
PM2.5 implementation rule provisions regarding ammonia and
VOC as precursors. The Court had no occasion to reach whether and how
it was substantively necessary to regulate any specific precursor in a
particular PM2.5 nonattainment area, and did not address
what might be necessary for purposes of acting upon a redesignation
request.
However, even if EPA takes the view that the requirements of
subpart 4 were deemed applicable at the time the state submitted the
redesignation request, and disregards the implementation rule's
rebuttable presumptions regarding ammonia and VOC as PM2.5
precursors, the regulatory consequence would be to consider the need
for regulation of all precursors from any sources in the area to
demonstrate attainment and to apply the section 189(e) provisions to
major stationary sources of precursors. In the case of Louisville, EPA
believes that doing so is consistent with proposing redesignation of
the area for the 1997 PM2.5 standard. The Louisville area
has attained the standard without any specific additional controls of
VOC and ammonia emissions from any sources in the area.
Precursors in subpart 4 are specifically regulated under the
provisions of section 189(e), which requires, with important
exceptions, control requirements for major stationary sources of
PM2.5 precursors.\8\ Under subpart 1 and EPA's prior
implementation rule, all major stationary sources of PM2.5
precursors were subject to regulation, with the exception of ammonia
and VOC. Thus we must address here whether additional controls of
ammonia and VOC from major stationary sources are required under
section 189(e) of subpart 4 in order to redesignate the area for the
1997 PM2.5 standard. As explained below, we do not believe
that any additional controls of ammonia and VOC are required in the
context of this redesignation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Under either subpart 1 or subpart 4, for purposes of
demonstrating attainment as expeditiously as practicable, a state is
required to evaluate all economically and technologically feasible
control measures for direct PM emissions and precursor emissions,
and adopt those measures that are deemed reasonably available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the General Preamble, EPA discusses its approach to implementing
section 189(e). See 57 FR 13538-13542. With regard to precursor
regulation under section 189(e), the General Preamble explicitly stated
that control of VOCs under other Act requirements may suffice to
relieve a state from the need to adopt precursor controls under section
189(e). 57 FR 13542. EPA in this proposal proposes to determine that
the SIP has met the provisions of section
[[Page 41743]]
189(e) with respect to ammonia and VOCs as precursors. This proposed
supplemental determination is based on our findings that: (1) The
Louisville area contains no major stationary sources of ammonia, and
(2) existing major stationary sources of VOC are adequately controlled
under other provisions of the CAA regulating the ozone NAAQS.\9\ In the
alternative, EPA proposes to determine that, under the express
exception provisions of section 189(e), and in the context of the
redesignation of the area, which is attaining the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard, at present ammonia and VOC precursors from
major stationary sources do not contribute significantly to levels
exceeding the 1997 PM2.5 standard in the Louisville area.
See 57 FR 13539-42.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Louisville area has reduced VOC emissions through the
implementation of various SIP-approved VOC control programs and
various on-road and nonroad motor vehicle control programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA notes that its 1997 PM2.5 implementation rule
provisions in 40 CFR 51.1002 were not directed at evaluation of
PM2.5 precursors in the context of redesignation, but at SIP
plans and control measures required to bring a nonattainment area into
attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. By contrast,
redesignation to attainment primarily requires the area to have already
attained due to permanent and enforceable emission reductions, and to
demonstrate that controls in place can continue to maintain the
standard. Thus, even if we regard the Court's January 4, 2013, decision
as calling for ``presumptive regulation'' of ammonia and VOC for
PM2.5 under the attainment planning provisions of subpart 4,
those provisions in and of themselves do not require additional
controls of these precursors for an area that already qualifies for
redesignation. Nor does EPA believe that requiring Indiana to address
precursors differently than they have already would result in a
substantively different outcome.
Although, as EPA has emphasized, its consideration here of
precursor requirements under subpart 4 is in the context of a
redesignation to attainment, EPA's existing interpretation of subpart 4
requirements with respect to precursors in attainment plans for
PM10 contemplates that states may develop attainment plans
that regulate only those precursors that are necessary for purposes of
attainment in the area in question, i.e., states may determine that
only certain precursors need be regulated for attainment and control
purposes.\10\ Courts have upheld this approach to the requirements of
subpart 4 for PM10.\11\ EPA believes that application of
this approach to PM2.5 precursors under subpart 4 is
reasonable. Because the Louisville area has already attained the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS with its current approach to regulation of
PM2.5 precursors, EPA believes that it is reasonable to
conclude in the context of this redesignation that there is no need to
revisit the attainment control strategy with respect to the treatment
of precursors. Even if the Court's decision is construed to impose an
obligation in evaluating this redesignation request to consider
additional precursors under subpart 4, it would not affect EPA's
approval here of Indiana's request for redesignation of the Louisville
area. In the context of a redesignation, the area has shown that it has
attained the standard. Moreover, the state has shown and EPA has
proposed to determine that attainment in this area is due to permanent
and enforceable emissions reductions on all precursors necessary to
provide for continued attainment. It follows logically that no further
control of additional precursors is necessary. Accordingly, EPA does
not view the January 4, 2013, decision of the Court as precluding
redesignation of the Louisville area to attainment for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., ``Approval and Promulgation of Implementation
Plans for California--San Joaquin Valley PM-10 Nonattainment Area;
Serious Area Plan for Nonattainment of the 24-Hour and Annual PM-10
Standards,'' 69 FR 30006 (May 26, 2004) (approving a PM10
attainment plan that impose controls on direct PM10 and
NOX emissions and did not impose controls on
SO2, VOC, or ammonia emissions).
\11\ See, e.g., Assoc. of Irritated Residents v. EPA et al., 423
F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In sum, even if Indiana were required to address precursors for the
Louisville area under subpart 4 rather than under subpart 1, as
interpreted in EPA's remanded PM2.5 implementation rule, EPA
would still conclude that the area had met all applicable requirements
for purposes of redesignation in accordance with section
107(d)(3)(E)(ii) and (v).
b. The Louisville Area Has a Fully Approved Applicable SIP Under
Section 110(k) of the CAA
Upon final approval of Indiana's comprehensive 2008 emissions
inventory, EPA will have fully approved the Indiana SIP for the
Louisville area under section 110(k) of the CAA for all requirements
applicable for purposes of redesignation. EPA may rely on prior SIP
approvals in approving a redesignation request (See page 3 of the
September 4, 1992, John Calcagni memorandum; Southwestern Pennsylvania
Growth Alliance v. Browner, 144 F.3d 984, 989-990 (6th Cir. 1998); Wall
v. EPA, 265 F.3d 426 (6th Cir. 2001)) plus any additional measures it
may approve in conjunction with a redesignation action. See 68 FR
25413, 25426 (May 12, 2003). Since the passage of the CAA of 1970,
Indiana has adopted and submitted, and EPA has fully approved,
provisions addressing various required SIP elements under particulate
matter standards. In this action, EPA is approving Indiana's 2008
emissions inventory for the Louisville area as meeting the requirement
of section 172(c)(3) of the CAA. No Louisville area SIP provisions are
currently disapproved, conditionally approved, or partially approved.
3. The Improvement in Air Quality Is Due to Permanent and Enforceable
Reductions in Emissions Resulting From Implementation of the SIP and
Applicable Federal Air Pollution Control Regulations and Other
Permanent and Enforceable Reductions (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii))
EPA believes that Indiana has demonstrated that the observed air
quality improvement in the Louisville area is due to permanent and
enforceable reductions in emissions resulting from implementation of
the SIP, Federal measures and other state-adopted measures.
In making this demonstration, Indiana has calculated the change in
emissions between 2005, one of the years the Louisville area was
monitoring nonattainment, and 2008, one of the years the Louisville
area monitored attainment. The reduction in emissions and the
corresponding improvement in air quality over this time period can be
attributed to a number of regulatory control measures that the
Louisville area and contributing areas have implemented in recent
years.
a. Permanent and Enforceable Controls Implemented
The following is a discussion of permanent and enforceable measures
that have been implemented in the area:
i. Federal Emission Control Measures
Reductions in fine particle precursor emissions have occurred
statewide and in upwind areas as a result of Federal emission control
measures, with additional emission reductions expected to occur in the
future. Federal emission control measures include the following.
Tier 2 Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur
Standards. These emission control requirements result in lower
NOX and SO2 emissions from new cars and light
duty trucks. The Federal rules were phased in
[[Page 41744]]
between 2004 and 2009. The EPA has estimated that, by the end of the
phase-in period, new vehicles will emit less NOX with the
following percentage decreases: Passenger cars (light duty vehicles)--
77%; light duty trucks, minivans and sports utility vehicles--86%; and,
larger sports utility vehicles, vans and heavier trucks--69% to 95%.
EPA expects fleet-wide average emissions to decline by similar
percentages as new vehicles replace older vehicles. The Tier 2
standards also reduced the sulfur content of gasoline to 30 parts per
million (ppm) beginning in January 2006. Most gasoline sold in Indiana
prior to January 2006 had a sulfur content of about 500 ppm.
Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Rule. EPA issued this rule in July 2000.
This rule includes standards limiting the sulfur content of diesel
fuel, which went into effect in 2004. A second phase took effect in
2007 which reduced fine particle emissions from heavy-duty highway
engines and further reduced the highway diesel fuel sulfur content to
15 ppm. The total program is estimated to achieve a 90% reduction in
direct PM2.5 emissions and a 95% reduction in NOX
emissions for these new engines using low sulfur diesel, compared to
existing engines using higher sulfur content diesel. The reduction in
fuel sulfur content also yielded an immediate reduction in sulfate
particle emissions from all diesel vehicles.
Nonroad Diesel Rule. In May 2004, EPA promulgated a new rule for
large nonroad diesel engines, such as those used in construction,
agriculture and mining equipment, to be phased in between 2008 and
2014. The rule also reduces the sulfur content in nonroad diesel fuel
by over 99%. Prior to 2006, nonroad diesel fuel averaged approximately
3,400 ppm sulfur. This rule limited nonroad diesel sulfur content to
500 ppm by 2006, with a further reduction to 15 ppm by 2010. The
combined engine and fuel rules will reduce NOX and
PM2.5 emissions from large nonroad diesel engines by over
90%, compared to current nonroad engines using higher sulfur content
diesel. It is estimated that compliance with this rule will cut
NOX emissions from nonroad diesel engines by up to 90%. This
rule achieved some emission reductions by 2008, and was fully
implemented by 2010. The reduction in fuel sulfur content also yielded
an immediate reduction in sulfate particle emissions from all diesel
vehicles.
Nonroad Large Spark-Ignition Engine and Recreational Engine
Standards. In November 2002, EPA promulgated emission standards for
groups of previously unregulated nonroad engines. These engines include
large spark-ignition engines such as those used in forklifts and
airport ground-service equipment; recreational vehicles using spark-
ignition engines such as off-highway motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles
and snowmobiles; and recreational marine diesel engines. Emission
standards from large spark-ignition engines were implemented in two
tiers, with Tier 1 starting in 2004 and Tier 2 in 2007. Recreational
vehicle emission standards are being phased in from 2006 through 2012.
Marine diesel engine standards were phased in from 2006 through 2009.
With full implementation of the entire nonroad spark-ignition engine
and recreational engine standards, an 80% reduction in NOX
expected by 2020. Some of these emission reductions occurred by the
2008-2010 period used to demonstrate attainment, and additional
emission reductions will occur during the maintenance period.
ii. Control Measures in Contributing Areas
NOX SIP Call. On October 27, 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA issued a
NOX SIP Call requiring the District of Columbia and 22
states to reduce emissions of NOX. Affected states were
required to comply with Phase I of the SIP Call beginning in 2004, and
Phase II beginning in 2007. Emission reductions resulting from
regulations developed in response to the NOX SIP Call are
permanent and enforceable.
CAIR. On May 12, 2005, EPA published CAIR, which requires
significant reductions in emissions of SO2 and
NOX from electric generating units to limit the interstate
transport of these pollutants and the ozone and fine particulate matter
they form in the atmosphere. See 76 FR 70093. The D.C. Circuit
initially vacated CAIR, North Carolina v. EPA, 531 F.3d 896 (D.C. Cir.
2008), but ultimately remanded the rule to EPA without vacatur to
preserve the environmental benefits provided by CAIR, North Carolina v.
EPA, 550 F.3d 1176, 1178 (D.C. Cir. 2008). In response to the Court's
decision, EPA issued the Transport Rule, also known as CSAPR), to
address interstate transport of NOX and SO2 in
the eastern United States. See 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011).
On December 30, 2011, the D.C. Circuit issued an order addressing
the status of CSAPR and CAIR in response to motions filed by numerous
parties seeking a stay of CSAPR pending judicial review. In that order,
the Court stayed CSAPR pending resolution of the petitions for review
of that rule in EME Homer City Generation. The Court also indicated
that EPA was expected to continue to administer CAIR in the interim
until judicial review of CSAPR was completed.
On August 21, 2012, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision to vacate
CSAPR. In that decision, it also ordered EPA to continue administering
CAIR ``pending the promulgation of a valid replacement.'' EME Homer
City, 696 F.3d at 38. The D.C. Circuit denied all petitions for
rehearing on January 24, 2013. EPA and other parties have filed
petitions for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, but those petitions
have not been acted on to date. Nonetheless, EPA intends to continue to
act in accordance with the EME Homer City opinion.
In light of these unique circumstances and for the reasons
explained below, to the extent that attainment is due to emission
reductions associated with CAIR, EPA is here proposing to determine
that those reductions are sufficiently permanent and enforceable for
purposes of CAA sections 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) and 175A. EPA therefore
proposes to approve the redesignation request and the related SIP
revision for Indiana portion of the Louisville area, including
Indiana's plan for maintaining attainment of the PM2.5
standard.
As directed by the D.C. Circuit, CAIR remains in place and
enforceable until substituted by a valid replacement rule. Indiana's
SIP revision lists CAIR as a control measure that became state-
effective October 22, 2007 and was fully approved by EPA on November
29, 2010 (75 FR 72956), for the purpose of reducing SO2 and
NOX emissions. CAIR was thus in place and getting emission
reductions when the Louisville area began monitoring attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. The quality-assured, certified
monitoring data used to demonstrate the area's attainment of the 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS by the April 2010 attainment deadline was
also impacted by CAIR.
To the extent that Indiana is relying on CAIR in its maintenance
plan, the recent directive from the D.C. Circuit in EME Homer City
ensures that the reductions associated with CAIR will be permanent and
enforceable for the necessary time period. EPA has been ordered by the
Court to develop a new rule to address interstate transport to replace
CSAPR and the opinion makes clear that after promulgating that new rule
EPA must provide states an opportunity to draft and submit SIPs to
implement that rule. Thus, CAIR will remain in place until EPA has
promulgated a final rule through a notice-and-comment rulemaking
process, States have had an opportunity
[[Page 41745]]
to draft and submit SIPs, EPA has reviewed the SIPs to determine if
they can be approved, and EPA has taken action on the SIPs, including
promulgating a FIP if appropriate. The Court's clear instruction to EPA
that it must continue to administer CAIR until a valid replacement
exists provides an additional backstop: By definition, any rule that
replaces CAIR and meets the Court's direction would require upwind
states to have SIPs that eliminate significant contributions to
downwind nonattainment and prevent interference with maintenance in
downwind areas.
Further, in vacating CSAPR and requiring EPA to continue
administering CAIR, the D.C. Circuit emphasized that the consequences
of vacating CAIR ``might be more severe now in light of the reliance
interests accumulated over the intervening four years.'' EME Homer
City, 696 F.3d at 38. The accumulated reliance interests include the
interests of states who reasonably assumed they could rely on
reductions associated with CAIR which brought certain nonattainment
areas into attainment with the NAAQS. If EPA were prevented from
relying on reductions associated with CAIR in redesignation actions,
states would be forced to impose additional, redundant reductions on
top of those achieved by CAIR. EPA believes this is precisely the type
of irrational result the Court sought to avoid by ordering EPA to
continue administering CAIR. For these reasons also, EPA believes it is
appropriate to allow states to rely on CAIR, and the existing emissions
reductions achieved by CAIR, as sufficiently permanent and enforceable
for purposes such as redesignation. Following promulgation of the
replacement rule, EPA will review SIPs as appropriate to identify
whether there are any issues that need to be addressed.
iii. Consent Decrees
Along with Federal and state rules controlling direct PM and
precursors, there have been a number of permanent and enforceable
consent decrees that have reduced emissions and will continue to reduce
emissions into the future. The EPA and Duke Energy consent decree
created caps on both NOX and SO2 similar
allocations provided for the Gallagher Generating Station in Floyd
County. Duke Energy Indiana permanently shut-down two of its four coal-
fired Electric Generating Units (EGUs) (Units 1 and 3) on February 1,
2012. The Tennessee Valley Authority has also recently entered into a
consent decree with EPA that establishes system-wide annual tonnage
limits for NOX and SO2 for its eleven coal-fired
power plants located in Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee.
NOX will be limited to 100,600 tpy beginning in 2011 and
capped at 52,000 tpy in 2018 and each year thereafter. SO2
will be limited to 285,000 tpy beginning in 2011 and capped at 110,000
tpy in 2019 and each year thereafter.
This will result in significant regional NOX and
SO2 reductions, further ensuring that the area will continue
to maintain the NAAQS in the future.
b. Emission Reductions
Indiana developed emissions inventories for NOX, direct
PM2.5 and SO2 for 2005, one of the years the area
monitored nonattainment, and 2008, one of the years the Louisville area
monitored attainment of the standard.
EGU SO2 and NOX emissions were derived from
EPA's Clean Air Market's acid rain database. These emissions reflect
Indiana and Kentucky's NOX emission budgets resulting from
EPA's NOX SIP call. The 2008 emissions from EGUs reflect
Indiana's emission caps under CAIR. All other point source emissions
were obtained from Indiana's source facility emissions reporting.
[[Page 41746]]
Area source emissions in the Louisville area for 2005 were taken
from periodic emissions inventories.\12\ These 2005 area source
emission estimates were extrapolated to 2008. Source growth factors
were supplied by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Periodic emission inventories are derived by states every
three years and reported to the EPA. These periodic emission
inventories are required by the Federal Consolidated Emissions
Reporting Rule, codified at 40 CFR Subpart A. EPA revised these and
other emission reporting requirements in a final rule published on
December 17, 2008, at 73 FR 76539.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonroad mobile source emissions were extrapolated from nonroad
mobile source emissions reported in EPA's 2005 National Emissions
Inventory (NEI). Contractors were employed by LADCO to estimate
emissions for commercial marine vessels and railroads.
On-road mobile source emissions were calculated using EPA's mobile
source emission factor model, MOVES2010a, in conjunction with
transportation model results developed by the local metropolitan
planning organization, Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development
Agency (KIPDA), along with the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District and IDEM.
All emissions estimates discussed below were documented in the
submittal and appendices of Indiana's redesignation request submittal
from June 16, 2011. For these data and additional emissions inventory
data, the reader is referred to EPA's digital docket for this rule,
https://www.regulations.gov, for docket number EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0698,
which includes digital copies of Indiana's submittal.
Emissions data in tpy for the entire Louisville area are shown in
Tables 2 and 3, below.
Table 2--Summary of 2005 Emissions for the Entire Louisville Area by Source Type
[tpy]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SO2 NOX PM2.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point (EGU)............................................... 174,178.36 48,103.47 3,443.00
Non-EGU................................................... 5,441.05 3,922.83 1,291.31
On-road................................................... 144.23 32,744.55 1,055.61
Nonroad................................................... 1,050.81 14,370.95 780.54
Area...................................................... 418.98 2,123.83 810.13
-----------------------------------------------------
Total Louisville...................................... 181,233.43 101,265.63 7,380.59
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Comparison of 2005 Emissions From the Nonattainment Year and 2008 Emissions for an Attainment Year for
the Entire Louisville Area
[tpy]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net change
2005 2008 (2005-2008)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM2.5..................................................... 7,380.59 6,724.02 -656.57
NOX....................................................... 101,265.63 97,533.93 -3,731.70
SO2....................................................... 181,233.43 151,503.01 -29,730.42
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3 shows that in the entire Louisville area reduced direct
PM2.5 emissions by 656.57 tons, NOX emissions by
3,731.70 tons and SO2 emissions by 29,730.42 tons between
2005, a nonattainment year, and 2008, an attainment year.
Emissions data in tpy the Indiana portion of the Louisville area
are shown in Tables 4, 5, and 6, below.
Table 4--Summary of 2008 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the Indiana Portion of the Louisville Area by Source
Type
[tpy]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SO2 NOX PM2.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point..................................................... 108,861.34 27,916.08 847.78
On-road................................................... 38.89 6,245.60 210.91
Nonroad................................................... 141.97 2,553.23 131.41
Area...................................................... 330.32 811.15 12.37
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. 109,372.52 37,526.06 1,202.47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5--Summary of 2007/2008 Base Year Emissions of VOCs and Ammonia
for the Entire Louisville Area by Source Type
[tpy]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ammonia VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point................................... 6.304 916.25
[[Page 41747]]
Area.................................... 1,193.20 5,618.26
Nonroad................................. 2.13 1,246.43
On-road................................. 113.13 2,886.02
-------------------------------
Total............................... 1,314.76 10,666.95
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 6--Comparison of 2005 Emissions From the Nonattainment Year and 2008 Emissions for an Attainment Year for
the Indiana Portion of the Louisville Area
[tpy]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net change
2005 2008 (2005-2008)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM2.5..................................................... 1,376.37 1,202.47 -173.90
NOX....................................................... 41,750.37 37,526.06 -4,224.31
SO2....................................................... 135,182.59 109,372.52 -25,810.07
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 6 shows that in the Indiana portion of the Louisville area
reduced direct PM2.5 emissions by 173.90 tons,
NOX emissions by 4,224.31 tons and SO2 emissions
by 25,810.07 tons between 2005, a nonattainment year, and 2008, an
attainment year.
Based on the information summarized above, Indiana has adequately
demonstrated that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent
and enforceable emissions reductions.
4. Indiana Has a Fully Approved Maintenance Plan Pursuant to Section
175A of the CAA (Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv))
In conjunction with Indiana's request to redesignate the Indiana
portion of the Louisville nonattainment area to attainment status,
Indiana has submitted a SIP revision to provide for maintenance of the
1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS in the area through 2025.
a. What is required in a maintenance plan?
Section 175A of the CAA sets forth the required elements of a
maintenance plan for areas seeking redesignation from nonattainment to
attainment. Under section 175A, the plan must demonstrate continued
attainment of the applicable NAAQS for at least ten years after EPA
approves a redesignation to attainment. Eight years after
redesignation, the state must submit a revised maintenance plan which
demonstrates that attainment will continue to be maintained for ten
years following the initial ten year maintenance period. To address the
possibility of future NAAQS violations, the maintenance plan must
contain contingency measures with a schedule for implementation as EPA
deems necessary to assure prompt correction of any future annual
PM2.5 violations.
The September 4, 1992, Calcagni memorandum provides additional
guidance on the content of a maintenance plan. The memorandum states
that a maintenance plan should address the following items: the
attainment emissions inventories, a maintenance demonstration showing
maintenance for the ten years of the maintenance period, a commitment
to maintain the existing monitoring network, factors and procedures to
be used for verification of continued attainment of the NAAQS and a
contingency plan to prevent or correct future violations of the NAAQS.
b. Attainment Inventory
Indiana developed emissions inventories for NOX, direct
PM2.5 and SO2 for 2008, one of the years in the
period during which the Louisville area monitored attainment of the
1997 annual PM2.5 standard, as described previously. The
attainment levels of emissions for the entire area, as well as the
attainment levels of emissions for the Indiana portion of the area were
summarized in Tables 3 and 5, above.
c. Demonstration of Maintenance
Along with the redesignation request, Indiana submitted a revision
to its PM2.5 SIP to include a maintenance plan for the
Louisville area, as required by section 175A of the CAA. Section 175A
requires a state seeking redesignation to attainment to submit a SIP
revision to provide for the maintenance of the NAAQS in the area ``for
at least 10 years after the redesignation.'' EPA has interpreted this
as a showing of maintenance ``for a period of ten years following
redesignation.'' Calcagni Memorandum, p. 9. Where the emissions
inventory method of showing maintenance is used, its purpose is to show
that emissions during the maintenance period will not increase over the
attainment year inventory. Calcagni Memorandum, pp. 9-10. A maintenance
demonstration may be based on such an emissions inventory approach. See
Wall v. EPA, 265 F.3d 426 (6th Cir. 2001), Sierra Club v. EPA, 375 F.
3d 537 (7th Cir. 2004). See also 66 FR 53094, 53099-53100 (October 19,
2001), 68 FR 25413, 25430-25432 (May 12, 2003).
Indiana's plan demonstrates maintenance of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard through 2025 by showing that current and
future emissions of NOX, directly emitted PM2.5
and SO2 for the area remain at or below attainment year
emission levels.
Indiana's submission uses emissions inventory projections for the
years 2015 and 2025 to demonstrate maintenance for the Indiana portion
of the Louisville area. The projected emissions were estimated by
Indiana, with assistance from LADCO and KIPDA using the MOVES2010a
model. Projection of inventory emissions was done for the 2015 interim
year emissions using estimates based on the 2009 and 2018 LADCO
modeling inventory, using LADCO's growth factors, for all sectors. The
2025 maintenance year emissions are based on emissions estimates from
the 2018 LADCO modeling. Table 7 shows the 2008 attainment base year
emission estimates and the 2015 and 2025 emission projections for the
entire tri-state Louisville area that Indiana
[[Page 41748]]
provided in its June 16, 2011, submission.
Table 7--Comparison of 2008, 2015 and 2025 NOX, Direct PM2.5 and SO2 Emission Totals (tpy) for the Louisville
Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SO2 NOX PM2.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 (baseline).................. 151,503.01............... 97,533.93............... 6,724.02
2015............................. 76,958.54................ 69,936.67............... 5,540.29
2025............................. 76,082.07................ 59,455.17............... 5,055.61
Change 2008-2025................. -75,420.94............... -38,078.76.............. -1,668.41
50% decrease............. 39% decrease........... 25% decrease
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 7 shows that the Louisville area will reduce NOX
emissions by 38,078.76 tpy between 2008 and the maintenance projection
to 2025, direct PM2.5 emissions by 1,668.41 tpy, and reduced
SO2 emissions by 75,420.94 tpy between 2008 and 2025.
An air quality modeling analysis conducted by IDEM demonstrates
that the Louisville area would be able to attain the PM2.5
standard even in the absence of either CAIR or CSAPR. See appendices H
and I. This modeling is available in the docket for this proposed
redesignation action.
Based on the information summarized above, Indiana has adequately
demonstrated maintenance of the PM2.5 standard in this area
for a period extending in excess of ten years from expected final
action on Indiana's redesignation request.
i. Maintenance Plan and Evaluation of VOCs and Ammonia
With regard to the redesignation of Louisville, in evaluating the
effect of the Court's remand of EPA's implementation rule, which
included presumptions against consideration of VOC and ammonia as
PM2.5 precursors, EPA in this proposal is also considering
the impact of the decision on the maintenance plan required under
sections 175A and 107(d)(3)(E)(iv). To begin with, EPA notes that the
area has attained the 1997 PM2.5 standard and that the state
has shown that attainment of that standard is due to permanent and
enforceable emission reductions.
EPA proposes to determine that the state's maintenance plan shows
continued maintenance of the standard by tracking the levels of the
precursors whose control brought about attainment of the 1997
PM2.5 standard in the Louisville area. EPA therefore
believes that the only additional consideration related to the
maintenance plan requirements that results from the Court's January 4,
2013, decision is that of assessing the potential role of VOC and
ammonia in demonstrating continued maintenance in this area. As
explained below, based upon documentation provided by the State and
supporting information, EPA believes that the maintenance plan for the
Louisville area need not include any additional emission reductions of
VOC or ammonia in order to provide for continued maintenance of the
standard.
First, as noted above in EPA's discussion of section 189(e), VOC
emission levels in this area have historically been well controlled
under SIP requirements related to ozone and other pollutants. Second,
total ammonia emissions throughout the Louisville area are very low,
estimated to be less than 1,500 tpy. See Table 8 below. This amount of
ammonia emissions appears especially small in comparison to the total
amounts of SO2, NOX, and even direct
PM2.5 emissions from sources in the area, see Table 7.
Third, as described below, available information shows that no
precursor, except ammonia, is expected to increase over the maintenance
period so as to interfere with or undermine the State's maintenance
demonstration.
Indiana's maintenance plan shows that emissions of direct
PM2.5, SO2, and NOX are projected to
decrease by 1,668 tpy, 75,420 tpy, and 38,078 tpy, respectively, over
the maintenance period. See Table 7 above. In addition, emissions
inventories used in the regulatory impact analysis (RIA), found in the
docket, for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, shows that VOC emissions
are projected to decrease by 14,551 tpy between 2007 and 2020. Although
ammonia emissions are predicted to increase slightly between 2007 and
2020, the large decrease of emissions in other precursors in comparison
will keep the area well below the standard. See Table 8 below. While
the RIA emissions inventories are only projected out to 2020, there is
no reason to believe that this downward trend would not continue
through 2025. Given that the Louisville area is already attaining the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS even with the current level of emissions
from sources in the area, the downward trend of emissions inventories
would be consistent with continued attainment. Indeed, projected
emissions reductions for the precursors that the state is addressing
for purposes of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, indicate that the area
should continue to attain the NAAQS following the precursor control
strategy that the state has already elected to pursue. Even if VOC and
ammonia emissions were to increase unexpectedly between 2020 and 2025,
the overall emissions reductions projected in direct PM2.5,
SO2, and NOX would be sufficient to offset any
increases. For these reasons, EPA believes that local emissions of all
of the potential PM2.5 precursors will not increase to the
extent that they will cause monitored PM2.5 levels to
violate the 1997 PM2.5 standard during the maintenance
period.
Table 8--Comparison of 2007 and 2020 VOC and Ammonia Emission Totals by Source Sector (tpy) for the Louisville Area \13\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC Ammonia
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sector Net change Net change
2007 2020 2007-2020 2007 2020 2007-2020
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point................................................... 1,084 1,099 15 6 97 91
Area.................................................... 5,504 5,460 -44 1,115 1,191 76
[[Page 41749]]
Nonroad................................................. 1,273 6,39 -634 2 250 248
On-road................................................. 2,087 9,35 -1,152 97 68 -29
Fires................................................... 73 73 0 5 5 0
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... 10,497 8,819 -1,678 1,270 1,407 137
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, available air quality modeling analyses done by the
state show continued maintenance of the standard during the maintenance
period. The current air quality design value for the area is 13.5
[mu]g/m\3\ (based on 2009-2011 air quality data), which is well below
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS of 15 [mu]g/m\3\. Moreover, the
modeling analysis conducted for the RIA for the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS indicates that the design value for this area is expected to
continue to decline through 2020. In the RIA analysis, the highest 2020
modeled design value for the Louisville area is 9.8 [mu]g/m\3\. Given
that precursor emissions are projected to decrease through 2025, it is
reasonable to conclude that monitored PM2.5 levels in this
area will also continue to decrease through 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ These emissions estimates were taken from the emissions
inventories developed for the RIA for the 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus, EPA believes that there is ample justification to conclude
that the Louisville area should be redesignated, even taking into
consideration the emissions of other precursors potentially relevant to
PM2.5. After consideration of the D.C. Circuit's January 4,
2013, decision, and for the reasons set forth in this notice, EPA
proposes to approve the State's maintenance plan and its request to
redesignate the Louisville area to attainment for the 1997
PM2.5 annual standard.
Based on the information summarized above, Indiana has adequately
demonstrated maintenance of the PM2.5 standard in this area
for a period extending in excess of ten years from expected final
action on Indiana's redesignation request.
d. Monitoring Network
Indiana's plan includes a commitment to continue working with
Kentucky to operate its EPA-approved monitoring network, as necessary
to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the NAAQS. Indiana currently
operates three PM2.5 monitors in Clark and Floyd counties in
order to monitor the Indiana portion of the Louisville area. Kentucky
currently operates four monitors in Jefferson County for the Louisville
area.
e. Verification of Continued Attainment
Indiana remains obligated to continue to quality-assure monitoring
data and enter all data into AQS in accordance with Federal guidelines.
Indiana will use these data, supplemented with additional information
as necessary, to assure that the area continues to attain the standard.
Indiana will also continue to develop and submit periodic emission
inventories as required by the Federal Consolidated Emissions Reporting
Rule (67 FR 39602, June 10, 2002) to track future levels of emissions.
Both of these actions will help to verify continued attainment in
accordance with 40 CFR part 58.
f. Contingency Plan
The contingency plan provisions are designed to promptly correct or
prevent a violation of the NAAQS that might occur after redesignation
of an area to attainment. Section 175A of the CAA requires that a
maintenance plan include such contingency measures as EPA deems
necessary to assure that the state will promptly correct a violation of
the NAAQS that occurs after redesignation. The maintenance plan should
identify the contingency measures to be adopted, a schedule and
procedure for adoption and implementation of the contingency measures,
and a time limit for action by the state. The state should also
identify specific indicators to be used to determine when the
contingency measures need to be adopted and implemented. The
maintenance plan must include a requirement that the state will
implement all measures with respect to control of the pollutant(s) that
were contained in the SIP before redesignation of the area to
attainment. See section 175A(d) of the CAA.
As required by section 175A of the CAA, Indiana has adopted a
contingency plan for the Louisville area to address possible future
annual PM2.5 air quality problems. Under Indiana's plan, if
a violation of the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard occurs,
Indiana will implement an ``Action Level Response'' to evaluate what
measures are warranted to address the violation, committing to
implement one or more measures from a list of candidate measures given
in the plan. Indiana's candidate contingency measures include the
following:
i. Vehicle inspection and maintenance program;
ii. Alternative fuel and diesel retrofit programs for fleet vehicle
operations;
iii. Requiring NOX or SO2 emissions offsets
for new and modified major and minor sources;
iv. Increasing the ratio of emissions offsets required for new
sources;
v. NOX or SO2 controls on new minor sources;
vi. Wood stove change-out program;
vii. Emission reduction measures for unpaved roads and parking
lots;
viii. Idle restrictions;
ix. Broader geographic applicability of existing measures; and
x. One or more transportation control measures sufficient to
achieve at least a 0.5% reduction in actual area wide precursor
emissions.
Under Indiana's plan, control measures are to be adopted and
implemented within 18 months from the end of the year in which air
quality triggering the Action Level Response occurs. Indiana further
commits to conduct ongoing review of its data, and if monitored
concentrations or emissions are trending upward, Indiana commits to
take appropriate steps to avoid a violation if possible. EPA believes
that Indiana's contingency plan satisfies the pertinent requirements of
section 175A(d).
EPA believes that Indiana's contingency measures, as well as the
commitment to continue implementing any SIP requirements, satisfy the
pertinent requirements of section 175A(d).
As required by section 175A(b) of the CAA, Indiana commits to
submit to the EPA an updated PM2.5 maintenance
[[Page 41750]]
plan eight years after redesignation of the Louisville area to cover an
additional ten year period beyond the initial ten year maintenance
period. As required by section 175A of the CAA, Indiana has also
committed to retain the PM2.5 control measures contained in
the SIP prior to redesignation.
For all of the reasons set forth above, EPA is proposing to approve
Indiana's 1997 annual PM2.5 maintenance plan for the
Louisville area as meeting the requirements of CAA section 175A.
5. Adequacy of Indiana's MVEB
1. How are MVEBs developed and what are the MVEBs for the Louisville
area?
Under the CAA, states are required to submit, at various times,
control strategy SIP revisions and maintenance plans for
PM2.5 nonattainment areas and for areas seeking
redesignation to attainment of the PM2.5 standard. These
emission control strategy SIP revisions (e.g., RFP and attainment
demonstration SIP revisions) and maintenance plans create MVEBs based
on on-road mobile source emissions for criteria pollutants and/or their
precursors to address pollution from on-road transportation sources.
The MVEBs are the portions of the total allowable emissions that are
allocated to highway and transit vehicle use that, together with
emissions from other sources in the area, will provide for attainment,
RFP or maintenance, as applicable.
Under 40 CFR part 93, a MVEB for an area seeking a redesignation to
attainment is established for the last year of the maintenance plan and
could also be established for an interim year or years. The MVEB serves
as a ceiling on emissions from an area's planned transportation system.
The MVEB concept is further explained in the preamble to the November
24, 1993, transportation conformity rule (58 FR 62188).
Under section 176(c) of the CAA, new transportation plans and
transportation improvement programs (TIPs) must be evaluated to
determine if they conform to the purpose of the area's SIP. Conformity
to the SIP means that transportation activities will not cause new air
quality violations, worsen existing air quality violations, or delay
timely attainment of the NAAQS or any required interim milestone. If a
transportation plan or TIP does not conform, most new transportation
projects that would expand the capacity of roadways cannot go forward.
Regulations at 40 CFR part 93 set forth EPA policy, criteria, and
procedures for demonstrating and assuring conformity of such
transportation activities to a SIP.
When reviewing SIP revisions containing MVEBs, including attainment
strategies, rate-of-progress plans, and maintenance plans, EPA must
affirmatively find adequate and/or approve the MVEBs for use in
determining transportation conformity before the MVEBs can be used.
Once EPA affirmatively approves and/or finds the submitted MVEBs to be
adequate for transportation conformity purposes, the MVEBs must be used
by state and Federal agencies in determining whether proposed
transportation plans and TIPs conform to the SIP as required by section
176(c) of the CAA. EPA's substantive criteria for determining the
adequacy of MVEBs are set out in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Additionally, to
approve a MVEB EPA must complete a thorough review of the SIP, in this
case the PM2.5 maintenance plans, and conclude that the SIP
will achieve its overall purpose, in this case providing for
maintenance of the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard in the Indiana
portions of the Louisville area.
EPA's process for determining adequacy of a MVEB consists of three
basic steps: (1) Providing public notification of a SIP submission; (2)
providing the public the opportunity to comment on the MVEB during a
public comment period; and, (3) EPA taking action on the MVEB. The
process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP MVEBs is codified
at 40 CFR 93.118.
The maintenance plan submitted by Indiana for the Louisville area
contains new primary PM2.5 and NOX MVEBs for the
area for the years 2015 and 2025. The motor vehicle emissions budgets
were calculated using MOVES2010(a). After the adequacy finding and
approval of the budgets become effective, the budgets will have to be
used in future conformity determinations and regional emissions
analyses prepared by the KIPDA, will have to be based on the use of
MOVES2010a or the most recent version of MOVES required to be used in
transportation conformity determinations.\14\ The states have
determined the 2015 MVEBs for the combined Indiana and Kentucky
portions of the Louisville area to be 580.69 tpy for primary
PM2.5 and 17,700.95 tpy for NOX. Indiana has
determined the 2025 MVEBs for the entire Louisville area to be 324.04
tpy for primary PM2.5 and 9,311.76 tpy for NOX.
These MVEBs exceed the on-road mobile source primary PM2.5
and NOX emissions projected by the states for 2015 and 2021.
Indiana has decided to include ``safety margins'' as provided for in 40
CFR 93.124(a) (described below) of 75.74 tpy and 42.27 tpy for primary
PM2.5 and 2,308.82 tpy and 1,214.58 tpy for NOX
in the 2015 and 2025 MVEBs, respectively, to provide for on-road mobile
source growth. Indiana did not provide emission budgets for
SO2, VOCs, and ammonia because it concluded that emissions
of these precursors from on-road motor vehicles are not significant
contributors to the area's PM2.5 air quality problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ EPA described the circumstances under which an area would
be required to use MOVES in transportation conformity determinations
in its March 2, 2010, Federal Register notice officially releasing
MOVES2010 for use in SIPs and transportation conformity
determinations. (75 FR 9413)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Indiana portion of the Louisville area, the motor vehicle
budgets including the safety margins and motor vehicle emission
projections for both NOX and PM2.5 are lower than
the levels in the attainment year.
EPA has reviewed the submitted budgets for 2015 and 2025 including
the added safety margins using the conformity rule's adequacy criteria
found at 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4) and the conformity rule's requirements for
safety margins found at 40 CFR 93.124(a). EPA has also completed a
thorough review of the maintenance plan for the Indiana portion of the
Louisville area. Based on the results of this review of the budgets and
the maintenance plans EPA is approving the 2015 and 2025 direct
PM2.5 and NOX budgets including the requested
safety margins for the Indiana portion of the Louisville area.
Additionally, EPA, through this rulemaking, has found the submitted
budgets to be adequate for use to determine transportation conformity
in the Indiana portion of the area, because EPA has determined that the
area can maintain the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for the
relevant maintenance period with on-road mobile source emissions at the
levels of the MVEBs including the requested safety margins. These
budgets must be used in conformity determinations made on or after the
effective date of this direct final rulemaking (40 CFR 93.118(f)(iii)).
Additionally, transportation conformity determinations made after the
effective date of this notice must be based on regional emissions
analyses using MOVES2010a or a more recent version of MOVES that has
been approved for use in conformity determinations.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ EPA described the circumstances under which an area would
be required to use MOVES in transportation conformity determinations
in its March 2, 2010 Federal Register notice officially releasing
MOVES2010 for use in SIPs and transportation conformity
determinations. (75 FR 9413)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 41751]]
2. What is a safety margin?
A ``safety margin'' is the difference between the attainment level
of emissions (from all sources) and the projected level of emissions
(from all sources) in the maintenance plan. As shown in Table 8, the
entire Louisville area is projected to have safety margins for
NOX and direct PM2.5 of 38,078.76 tpy and
1,668.41 tpy in 2025 (the difference between the attainment year, 2008,
emissions and the projected year of 2025 emissions for all sources in
the Louisville area). The transportation conformity rule allows areas
to allocate all or a portion of a ``safety margin'' to the area's motor
vehicle emissions budgets (40 CFR 92.124(a)). The MVEBs requested by
Indiana contain NOX safety margins for mobile sources in
2015 and 2025 and PM2.5 safety margins for mobile sources in
2015 and 2025 are much smaller than the allowable safety margins
reflected in the total emissions for the Louisville area. The state is
not requesting allocation to the MVEBs of the entire available safety
margins reflected in the demonstration of maintenance. Therefore, even
though the state is requesting MVEBs that exceed the projected on-road
mobile source emissions for 2015 and 2025 contained in the
demonstration of maintenance, the increase in on-road mobile source
emissions that can be considered for transportation conformity purposes
is well within the safety margins of the overall PM2.5
maintenance demonstration.
Therefore, EPA believes that the requested budgets, including the
requested portion of the safety margins, provide for a quantity of
mobile source emissions that would be expected to maintain the
PM2.5 standard. Once allocated to mobile sources, these
portions of the safety margins will not be available for use by other
sources.
3. What action is EPA taking on the submitted motor vehicle emissions
budgets?
EPA, through this rulemaking, has found adequate and is approving
the MVEBs for use to determine transportation conformity in the Indiana
portion of the Louisville area, because EPA has determined that the
area can maintain attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
for the relevant maintenance period with mobile source emissions at the
levels of the MVEBs including the requested safety margins. These
budgets must be used in conformity determinations if this rulemaking
goes final. (40 CFR 93.118(f)(iii)) Additionally, the determinations
must be based on regional emissions analyses using MOVES2010b or a more
recent version of MOVES that has been approved for use in conformity
determinations.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ EPA described the circumstances under which an area would
be required to use MOVES in transportation conformity determinations
in its March 2, 2010, Federal Register notice officially releasing
MOVES2010 for use in SIPs and transportation conformity
determinations. (75 FR 9413)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. 2008 Comprehensive Emissions Inventory
As discussed above, section 172(c)(3) of the CAA requires areas to
submit a comprehensive emissions inventory. Indiana submitted a 2008
base year emissions inventory that meets this requirement. Emissions
contained in the submittals cover the general source categories of
point sources, area sources, on-road mobile sources, and nonroad mobile
sources. Discussion of how these emissions were compiled is found in
section V(3)(b) above, as well as in the docket.
The emissions for the 2008 base year emission inventory and
supplemental precursor emissions inventory are found in Tables 4 and 5,
and documented in Indiana's redesignation request submittal and
supplemental submittal. EPA has reviewed Indiana's documentation of the
emissions inventory techniques and data sources used for the derivation
of the 2008 emissions estimates, and has found that Indiana has
thoroughly documented the derivation of these emissions inventories.
The submittal from the state shows that the 2008 emissions inventory is
currently the most complete emissions inventories for PM2.5
and PM2.5 precursors in the Louisville area. Based upon
EPA's review, we propose to find that the base year emissions inventory
are as complete and accurate as possible given the input data available
to Indiana, and we are proposing to approve them under CAA section
172(c)(3).
7. Summary of Proposed Actions
EPA has previously determined that the Louisville area has attained
the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is proposing to determine
that the entire Louisville area continues to attain the 1997 annual
PM2.5 standard using the latest three years of certified,
quality-assured data, and that the Indiana portion of the area has met
the requirements for redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the
CAA. EPA is proposing to grant the request from Indiana to change the
legal designation of the Indiana portion of the Louisville area from
nonattainment to attainment for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
EPA is proposing to approve Indiana's PM2.5 maintenance plan
for the Louisville area as a revision to the Indiana SIP because the
plan meets the requirements of section 175A of the CAA. EPA is
proposing to approve the 2008 emissions inventory for primary
PM2.5, NOX, SO2, VOC and ammonia
documented in Indiana's June 16, 2011, submittal and supplement on
March 18, 2013, as satisfying the requirement in section 172(c)(3) of
the CAA for a comprehensive, current emission inventory. Finally, EPA
finds adequate and is approving 2015 and 2025 primary PM2.5
and NOX MVEBs for the Louisville area. These MVEBs will be
used in future transportation conformity analyses for the area.
VI. What are the effects of EPA's proposed actions?
If finalized, approval of the redesignation request would change
the official designation of the Indiana portion of the Louisville area
for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, found at 40 CFR part 81,
from nonattainment to attainment. A final approval would also be a
revision to the Indiana SIP for the Louisville area, the maintenance
plan for the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard, MVEBs, as well as
the 2008 emissions inventory included with the redesignation request.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E)
are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of
itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the
applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have
been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, these actions:
Are not a ''significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office
[[Page 41752]]
of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, National Parks,
Wilderness.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2013-16659 Filed 7-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P