Denial of Exemption Applications; Epilepsy and Seizure Disorders, 41185-41187 [2013-16460]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Notices
the Aviation Safety and Capacity
Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (Title
14 CFR part 158).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this
application may be mailed or delivered
in triplicate to the FAA at the following
address: Federal Aviation
Administration, Airports Division,
15000 Aviation Blvd., Room 3012,
Lawndale, CA 90261. In addition, one
copy of any comments submitted to the
FAA must be mailed or delivered to Mr.
John L. Martin, Airport Director, San
Francisco International Airport, at the
following address: 575 North
McDonnell Road, 2nd Floor, San
Francisco, CA 94128. Air carriers and
foreign air carriers may submit copies of
written comments previously provided
to the San Francisco Airport
Commission under section 158.23 of
Part 158.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arlene Draper, Assistant Manager, San
Francisco Airports District Office, 1000
Marina Boulevard, Suite 220, Brisbane,
CA 94005–1835, Telephone: (650) 827–
7602. The application may be reviewed
in person at this same location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
proposes to rule and invites public
comment on the application to impose
and use PFC revenue at San Francisco
International Airport, under the
provisions of the 49 U.S.C. 40117 and
Part 158 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (Title 14 CFR Part 158).
On October 5, 2010, the public agency
submitted an application to impose and
use PFC revenue on 25 projects at SFO.
On November 4, 2010, the FAA found
the application was not substantially
complete. On November 18, 2010, the
public agency notified the FAA of their
intent to supplement the application.
The FAA received the supplemented
application on June 14, 2013, within the
requirements of section 158.27 of Part
158. The FAA will approve or
disapprove the application, in whole or
in part, no later than October 12, 2013.
The following is a brief overview of
PFC application No. 11–05–C–00–SFO:
Proposed charge effective date:
January 1, 2017.
Proposed charge expiration date: June
1, 2023.
Level of the proposed PFC: $4.50.
Total estimated PFC revenue:
$610,451,805.
Description of the impose and use
project:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Terminal 2 and Boarding Area D
Renovations—the project provides for
the reimbursement of the costs
associated with the renovation,
expansion, and modernization of the
San Francisco International Airport
Terminal 2 and Boarding Area D,
including the installation of 14 boarding
gates and associated aircraft parking
apron and passenger loading bridges.
Withdrawn Projects: By letter dated
June 14, 2013, the public agency
withdrew 23 airfield improvement
projects and the International terminal
common use system improvements
project, included in the original October
5, 2010 application. Therefore, these
projects are no longer part of this
application.
Class or classes of air carriers which
the public agency has requested not be
required to collect PFCs: Non-scheduled
on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form
1800–31.
Any person may inspect the
application in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT and at the FAA
Regional Office located at: 15000
Aviation Blvd., Room 3012, Lawndale,
CA 90261. In addition, any person may,
upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents germane to
the application in person at the San
Francisco International Airport.
Issued in Lawndale, California, on June 27,
2013.
Mia Paredes Ratcliff,
Manager, Planning and Programming Branch,
Western-Pacific Region.
41185
aeronautical purposes and would better
serve the airport if used for aviation
compatible, non-aeronautical revenue
generation. Full and permanent relief of
the surplus property requirements on
this specific parcel will allow the
airport and its tenant on this parcels to
enter into a long-term lease and begin
making infrastructure improvements.
All revenues through the leasing of the
parcel will continue to be subject to the
FAAs revenue-use policy and dedicated
to the maintenance and operation of the
Brunswick Executive Airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
document to Mr. Barry J. Hammer at the
Federal Aviation Administration, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, Massachusetts 01803,
Telephone 781–238–7625.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Documents are available for review by
appointment by contacting Mr. Marty
McMahon, Telephone 207–798–6512 or
by contacting Mr. Barry J. Hammer,
Federal Aviation Administration, 16
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, Massachusetts, Telephone
781–238–7625.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on
June 17, 2013.
Mary T. Walsh,
Manager, Airports Division, New England
Region.
[FR Doc. 2013–16462 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[FR Doc. 2013–16453 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Opportunity for Public
Comment on Surplus Property Release
at Brunswick Executive Airport in
Brunswick, ME
[Docket No. FMCSA–2006–24278; FMCSA–
2006–25854; FMCSA 2008–0355; FMCSA
2010–0203; FMCSA–2011–0089]
Denial of Exemption Applications;
Epilepsy and Seizure Disorders
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for Public Comments.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of Title
49, U.S.C. 47153(d), notice is being
given that the FAA is considering a
request from Midcoast Regional
Redevelopment Authority to waive the
surplus property requirements for
approximately 3.47 acres of airport
property located at Brunswick Executive
Airport in Brunswick, ME.
It has been determined through study
and master planning that the subject
parcel will not be needed for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denial for exemptions
from the provisions of 49 CFR
391.41(b)(8).
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces denial of
applications from seven individuals for
an exemption from the prohibition
against persons with a clinical diagnosis
of epilepsy or any other condition
which is likely to cause a loss of
consciousness or any loss of ability to
operate a commercial motor vehicle
(CMV), from operating CMVs in
interstate commerce. Reasons for denial
are listed after each name entry.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
41186
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elaine M. Papp, Director, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64–224, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e),
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statutes also
allow the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The 7
individuals listed in this notice have
recently requested an exemption from
the epilepsy and seizure disorder
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8), which
applies to drivers who operate CMVs, as
defined in 49 CFR 390.5, in interstate
commerce. Section 391.41(b)(8) states
that a person is physically qualified to
drive a CMV if that person has no
established medical history or clinical
diagnosis of epilepsy or any other
condition which is likely to cause the
loss of consciousness or any loss of
ability to control a commercial motor
vehicle.
In order to make an evidence-based
decision, FMCSA conducted a
comprehensive review of scientific
literature and convened a panel of
medical experts in the field of neurology
to evaluate key questions regarding
seizure and anti-seizure medication
related to the safe operation of a
commercial motor vehicle. In reaching
the determination to grant or deny
exemption requests for individuals who
have experienced a seizure, the Agency
considered both current medical
literature and information and the 2007
recommendations of the Agency’s
Medical Expert Panel (MEP). The
Agency previously gathered evidence
for decision-making concerning
potential changes to the regulation, by
conducting a comprehensive review of
scientific literature that was compiled
into a report entitled, ‘‘Evidence Report
on Seizure Disorders and Commercial
Vehicle Driving’’ (Evidence Report) [CD–
ROM HD TL230.3 .E95 2007]. The
Agency then convened an MEP in the
field of neurology on May 14–15, 2007,
to review: 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8) and the
advisory criteria regarding individuals
who have experienced a seizure; and the
2007 Evidence Report. The Evidence
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Report and the MEP recommendations
are published on-line at https://
www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/
topics/mep/mep-reports.htm, under
Seizure Disorders, and are in the docket
for this notice.
MEP Criteria for Evaluation
On October 15, 2007, the MEP issued
the following recommended criteria for
evaluating whether an individual with
epilepsy or a seizure disorder should be
allowed to operate a CMV.1 The MEP
recommendations are included in an
appendix at the end of this notice and
in each of the previously published
dockets.
Epilepsy diagnosis. If there is an
epilepsy diagnosis, the applicant should
be seizure-free for 8 years, on or off
medication. If the individual is taking
anti-seizure medication(s), the plan for
medication should be stable for 2 years.
Stable means no changes in medication,
dosage, or frequency of medication
administration. Recertification for
drivers with an epilepsy diagnosis
should be performed every year.
Single unprovoked seizure. If there is
a single unprovoked seizure (i.e., there
is no known trigger for the seizure), the
individual should be seizure-free for 4
years, on or off medication. If the
individual is taking anti-seizure
medication(s), the plan for medication
should be stable for 2 years. Stable
means no changes in medication,
dosage, or frequency of medication
administration. Recertification for
drivers with a single unprovoked
seizure should be performed every 2
years.
Single provoked seizure. If there is a
single provoked seizure (i.e., there is a
known reason for the seizure), the
Agency should consider specific criteria
that fall into the following two
categories: Low-risk factors for
recurrence and moderate-to-high risk
factors for recurrence.
• Examples of low-risk factors for
recurrence include seizures that were
caused by a medication; by nonpenetrating head injury with loss of
consciousness less than or equal to 30
minutes; by a brief loss of consciousness
not likely to recur while driving; by
metabolic derangement not likely to
recur; and by alcohol or illicit drug
withdrawal.
• Examples of moderate-to-high-risk
factors for recurrence include seizures
caused by non-penetrating head injury
with loss of consciousness or amnesia
1 Engel, J., Fisher, R.S., Krauss, G.L., Krumholz,
A., and Quigg, M.S., ‘‘Expert Panel
Recommendations: Seizure Disorders and
Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety,’’ FMCSA,
October 15, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
greater than 30 minutes, or penetrating
head injury; intracerebral hemorrhage
associated with a stroke or trauma;
infections; intracranial hemorrhage;
post-operative complications from brain
surgery with significant brain
hemorrhage; brain tumor; or stroke.
The MEP report indicates individuals
with moderate to high-risk conditions
should not be certified. Drivers with a
history of a single provoked seizure
with low risk factors for recurrence
should be recertified every year.
Medical Review Board
Recommendations and Agency Decision
FMCSA presented the MEP’s findings
and the Evidence Report to the Medical
Review Board (MRB) for consideration.
The MRB reviewed and considered the
2007 ‘‘Seizure Disorders and
Commercial Driver Safety’’ evidence
report and the 2007 MEP
recommendations. The MRB
recommended maintaining the current
advisory criteria, which provide that
‘‘drivers with a history of epilepsy/
seizures off anti-seizure medication and
seizure-free for 10 years may be
qualified to drive a CMV in interstate
commerce. Interstate drivers with a
history of a single unprovoked seizure
may be qualified to drive a CMV in
interstate commerce if seizure-free and
off anti-seizure medication for a 5 year
period or more’’ [Advisory criteria to 49
CFR 391.43(f)].
The Agency acknowledges the MRB’s
position on the issue but believes
relevant current medical evidence
supports a less conservative approach.
The medical advisory criteria for
epilepsy and other seizure or loss of
consciousness episodes was based on
the 1988 ‘‘Conference of Neurological
Disorders and Commercial Driving’’
(NITS Accession No. PB89–158950/AS).
A copy of the report can be found in the
docket referenced in this notice.
The MRB’s recommendation treats all
drivers who have experienced a seizure
the same, regardless of individual
medical conditions and circumstances.
In addition, the recommendation to
continue prohibiting drivers who are
taking anti-seizure medication from
operating a CMV in interstate commerce
does not consider a driver’s actual
seizure history and time since the last
seizure. The Agency has decided to use
the 2007 MEP recommendations as the
basis for evaluating applications for an
exemption from the seizure regulation
on an individual, case-by-case basis.
The disposition of applications
announced in this notice applies the
2007 MEP recommendations.
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Notices
Public Comments
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Patty Cantagallo, MD, expressed her
concern that applicant John Morris had
indications of alcohol abuse in his
medical data. The Agency did not
include Mr. Morris in the final
disposition. Dr. Cantagallo also
indicated uncertainty with applicant
Anthony Besch having unresolved
‘‘nighttime seizures.’’ Mr. Besch was
excluded from final disposition.
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Denials and Reasons
• The following drivers were listed
previously in Federal Register Notice
FMCSA–2006–24278:
Anthony Besch—We are unable to
contact Mr. Besch by phone or through
his former employer to ascertain his
status.
Charles Gant—Mr. Gant’s records
indicated that he had suffered transient
ischemic attacks (stroke), not epilepsy.
John Morris—Mr. Morris’ file
indicated that his seizure was induced
by alcohol.
• The following driver was
previously listed in Federal Register
Notice FMCSA–2006–25854:
Daniel L. Pulse—Mr. Pulse may meet
the criteria, but he has been
unresponsive in attempts to certify the
date of his last seizure and/or any antiseizure medication he is taking.
• The following driver was
previously listed in Federal Register
FMCSA–2008–0355:
Travis Williams—Mr. Williams has a
diagnosis of epilepsy, and his last
seizure was in 2008. He will have been
seizure-free for 8 years, as required by
the MEP guidelines, in 2016. He may
reapply at that time.
• The following driver was listed
previously in Federal Register FMCSA
2010–0203:
Leo Lombardio—Mr. Lombadrio had a
loss of consciousness event related to a
diagnosis of complex partial seizures in
2009. He does not meet the exemption
criteria at this time.
• The following driver was listed
previously in Federal Register FMCSA
2011–0089:
Richard Laqua—Mr. Laqua had a
seizure in 2009 and does not currently
meet the exemption criteria.
Issued on: June 27, 2013.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–16460 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
[Docket No. FMCSA–2013–0147]
Driver Qualifications: Skill
Performance Evaluation; Virginia
Department of Motor Vehicles’
Application for Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for
exemption; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces receipt of
an application for exemption from the
Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
(Virginia), on behalf of truck and bus
drivers who are licensed in the
Commonwealth of Virginia and need a
Skill Performance Evaluation (SPE)
certificate from FMCSA to operate
commercial motor vehicles in interstate
commerce. The exemption would
enable Virginia-licensed drivers subject
to the Federal SPE requirements under
49 CFR 391.49, to fulfill the Federal
requirements with a State-issued SPE.
The State-issued SPE would be based on
standards, processes and procedures
comparable to those used by FMCSA,
and the State would maintain copies of
all evaluation forms and certificates
issued to enable FMCSA to conduct
periodic reviews of the program.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
bearing the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) number FMCSA–2013–
0147 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, DOT Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. E.T., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and docket
number for this notice. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
exemption process, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading below. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
41187
personal information provided. Please
see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading for
further information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to Room W12–
140, DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. If you want
acknowledgement that we received your
comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register published on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316) or you
may visit https://edocket/access.gpo.gov/
2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Eileen Nolan, Office of Carrier, Driver
and Vehicle Safety, Medical Programs
Division, (202) 366–4001, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain parts of the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations. FMCSA must
publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for
denying or granting the application and,
if granted, the name of the person or
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41185-41187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16460]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2006-24278; FMCSA-2006-25854; FMCSA 2008-0355; FMCSA
2010-0203; FMCSA-2011-0089]
Denial of Exemption Applications; Epilepsy and Seizure Disorders
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of denial for exemptions from the provisions of 49 CFR
391.41(b)(8).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces denial of applications from seven individuals
for an exemption from the prohibition against persons with a clinical
diagnosis of epilepsy or any other condition which is likely to cause a
loss of consciousness or any loss of ability to operate a commercial
motor vehicle (CMV), from operating CMVs in interstate commerce.
Reasons for denial are listed after each name entry.
[[Page 41186]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Papp, Director, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64-224, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption
for a 2-year period if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that
would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The statutes also allow the
Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the 2-year period. The 7
individuals listed in this notice have recently requested an exemption
from the epilepsy and seizure disorder standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8),
which applies to drivers who operate CMVs, as defined in 49 CFR 390.5,
in interstate commerce. Section 391.41(b)(8) states that a person is
physically qualified to drive a CMV if that person has no established
medical history or clinical diagnosis of epilepsy or any other
condition which is likely to cause the loss of consciousness or any
loss of ability to control a commercial motor vehicle.
In order to make an evidence-based decision, FMCSA conducted a
comprehensive review of scientific literature and convened a panel of
medical experts in the field of neurology to evaluate key questions
regarding seizure and anti-seizure medication related to the safe
operation of a commercial motor vehicle. In reaching the determination
to grant or deny exemption requests for individuals who have
experienced a seizure, the Agency considered both current medical
literature and information and the 2007 recommendations of the Agency's
Medical Expert Panel (MEP). The Agency previously gathered evidence for
decision-making concerning potential changes to the regulation, by
conducting a comprehensive review of scientific literature that was
compiled into a report entitled, ``Evidence Report on Seizure Disorders
and Commercial Vehicle Driving'' (Evidence Report) [CD-ROM HD TL230.3
.E95 2007]. The Agency then convened an MEP in the field of neurology
on May 14-15, 2007, to review: 49 CFR 391.41(b)(8) and the advisory
criteria regarding individuals who have experienced a seizure; and the
2007 Evidence Report. The Evidence Report and the MEP recommendations
are published on-line at https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/topics/mep/mep-reports.htm, under Seizure Disorders, and are in the
docket for this notice.
MEP Criteria for Evaluation
On October 15, 2007, the MEP issued the following recommended
criteria for evaluating whether an individual with epilepsy or a
seizure disorder should be allowed to operate a CMV.\1\ The MEP
recommendations are included in an appendix at the end of this notice
and in each of the previously published dockets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Engel, J., Fisher, R.S., Krauss, G.L., Krumholz, A., and
Quigg, M.S., ``Expert Panel Recommendations: Seizure Disorders and
Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Safety,'' FMCSA, October 15, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Epilepsy diagnosis. If there is an epilepsy diagnosis, the
applicant should be seizure-free for 8 years, on or off medication. If
the individual is taking anti-seizure medication(s), the plan for
medication should be stable for 2 years. Stable means no changes in
medication, dosage, or frequency of medication administration.
Recertification for drivers with an epilepsy diagnosis should be
performed every year.
Single unprovoked seizure. If there is a single unprovoked seizure
(i.e., there is no known trigger for the seizure), the individual
should be seizure-free for 4 years, on or off medication. If the
individual is taking anti-seizure medication(s), the plan for
medication should be stable for 2 years. Stable means no changes in
medication, dosage, or frequency of medication administration.
Recertification for drivers with a single unprovoked seizure should be
performed every 2 years.
Single provoked seizure. If there is a single provoked seizure
(i.e., there is a known reason for the seizure), the Agency should
consider specific criteria that fall into the following two categories:
Low-risk factors for recurrence and moderate-to-high risk factors for
recurrence.
Examples of low-risk factors for recurrence include
seizures that were caused by a medication; by non-penetrating head
injury with loss of consciousness less than or equal to 30 minutes; by
a brief loss of consciousness not likely to recur while driving; by
metabolic derangement not likely to recur; and by alcohol or illicit
drug withdrawal.
Examples of moderate-to-high-risk factors for recurrence
include seizures caused by non-penetrating head injury with loss of
consciousness or amnesia greater than 30 minutes, or penetrating head
injury; intracerebral hemorrhage associated with a stroke or trauma;
infections; intracranial hemorrhage; post-operative complications from
brain surgery with significant brain hemorrhage; brain tumor; or
stroke.
The MEP report indicates individuals with moderate to high-risk
conditions should not be certified. Drivers with a history of a single
provoked seizure with low risk factors for recurrence should be
recertified every year.
Medical Review Board Recommendations and Agency Decision
FMCSA presented the MEP's findings and the Evidence Report to the
Medical Review Board (MRB) for consideration. The MRB reviewed and
considered the 2007 ``Seizure Disorders and Commercial Driver Safety''
evidence report and the 2007 MEP recommendations. The MRB recommended
maintaining the current advisory criteria, which provide that ``drivers
with a history of epilepsy/seizures off anti-seizure medication and
seizure-free for 10 years may be qualified to drive a CMV in interstate
commerce. Interstate drivers with a history of a single unprovoked
seizure may be qualified to drive a CMV in interstate commerce if
seizure-free and off anti-seizure medication for a 5 year period or
more'' [Advisory criteria to 49 CFR 391.43(f)].
The Agency acknowledges the MRB's position on the issue but
believes relevant current medical evidence supports a less conservative
approach. The medical advisory criteria for epilepsy and other seizure
or loss of consciousness episodes was based on the 1988 ``Conference of
Neurological Disorders and Commercial Driving'' (NITS Accession No.
PB89-158950/AS). A copy of the report can be found in the docket
referenced in this notice.
The MRB's recommendation treats all drivers who have experienced a
seizure the same, regardless of individual medical conditions and
circumstances. In addition, the recommendation to continue prohibiting
drivers who are taking anti-seizure medication from operating a CMV in
interstate commerce does not consider a driver's actual seizure history
and time since the last seizure. The Agency has decided to use the 2007
MEP recommendations as the basis for evaluating applications for an
exemption from the seizure regulation on an individual, case-by-case
basis. The disposition of applications announced in this notice applies
the 2007 MEP recommendations.
[[Page 41187]]
Public Comments
Patty Cantagallo, MD, expressed her concern that applicant John
Morris had indications of alcohol abuse in his medical data. The Agency
did not include Mr. Morris in the final disposition. Dr. Cantagallo
also indicated uncertainty with applicant Anthony Besch having
unresolved ``nighttime seizures.'' Mr. Besch was excluded from final
disposition.
Denials and Reasons
The following drivers were listed previously in Federal
Register Notice FMCSA-2006-24278:
Anthony Besch--We are unable to contact Mr. Besch by phone or
through his former employer to ascertain his status.
Charles Gant--Mr. Gant's records indicated that he had suffered
transient ischemic attacks (stroke), not epilepsy.
John Morris--Mr. Morris' file indicated that his seizure was
induced by alcohol.
The following driver was previously listed in Federal
Register Notice FMCSA-2006-25854:
Daniel L. Pulse--Mr. Pulse may meet the criteria, but he has been
unresponsive in attempts to certify the date of his last seizure and/or
any anti-seizure medication he is taking.
The following driver was previously listed in Federal
Register FMCSA-2008-0355:
Travis Williams--Mr. Williams has a diagnosis of epilepsy, and his
last seizure was in 2008. He will have been seizure-free for 8 years,
as required by the MEP guidelines, in 2016. He may reapply at that
time.
The following driver was listed previously in Federal
Register FMCSA 2010-0203:
Leo Lombardio--Mr. Lombadrio had a loss of consciousness event
related to a diagnosis of complex partial seizures in 2009. He does not
meet the exemption criteria at this time.
The following driver was listed previously in Federal
Register FMCSA 2011-0089:
Richard Laqua--Mr. Laqua had a seizure in 2009 and does not
currently meet the exemption criteria.
Issued on: June 27, 2013.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-16460 Filed 7-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P