Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of Important Safety Information, 41064-41065 [2013-16445]
Download as PDF
41064
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Notices
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than August 2, 2013.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
(Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice
President) 230 South LaSalle Street,
Chicago, Illinois 60690–1414:
1. Heartland Financial USA, Inc.,
Dubuque, Iowa, to acquire 100 percent
of Morrill Bancshares, Inc., Merriam,
Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire,
The Morrill & Janes Bank and Trust
Company, Overland Park, Kansas.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(Yvonne Sparks, Community
Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St.
Louis, Missouri 63166–2034:
1. Home Bancshares, Inc., Conway,
Arkansas, to merge with Liberty
Bancshares, Inc. and thereby indirectly
acquire Liberty Bank of Arkansas, both
of Jonesboro, Arkansas.
C. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King,
Community Affairs Officer) 90
Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55480–0291:
1. Tolna Bancorp, Inc., Tolna, North
Dakota, to acquire 100 percent of
McVille Financial Services, Inc.,
McVille, North Dakota, and thereby
indirectly acquire McVille State Bank,
McVille, North Dakota. Comments must
be received by July 29, 2013.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, July 3, 2013.
Michael Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–16417 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Title: OCSE–75 Tribal Child Support
Enforcement Program Annual Data
Report.
OMB No.: 0970–0320
Description: The data collected by
form OCSE–75 are used to prepare the
OCSE preliminary and annual data
reports. In addition, Tribes
administering CSE programs under Title
IV–D of the Social Security Act are
required to report program status and
accomplishments in an annual narrative
report and submit the OCSE–75 report
annually.
Respondents: Tribal Child Support
Enforcement Organizations or the
Department/Agency/Bureau responsible
for Child Support Enforcement in each
tribe.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total burden
hours
OCSE–75 .........................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Instrument
60
1
60
3,600
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,600.
Additional Information: Copies of the
proposed collection may be obtained by
writing to the Administration for
Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370
L’Enfant Promenade SW., Washington,
DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance
Officer. All requests should be
identified by the title of the information
collection. Email address:
infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.
OMB Comment: OMB is required to
make a decision concerning the
collection of information between 30
and 60 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, a comment is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication. Written
comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should
be sent directly to the following: Office
of Management and Budget, Paperwork
Reduction Project, Fax: 202–395–7285,
Email:
OIRA_SUBMISSION@OMB.EOP.GOV.
Attn: Desk Officer for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
Administration for Children and
Families.
Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–16357 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0319]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry and Food and Drug
Administration Staff on Dear Health
Care Provider Letters: Improving
Communication of Important Safety
Information
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by August 8,
2013.
To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or emailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–NEW and
title ‘‘Draft Guidance for Industry and
Food and Drug Administration Staff on
Dear Health Care Provider Letters:
Improving Communication of Important
Safety Information.’’ Also include the
FDA docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila
S. Mizrachi, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug
Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50–
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
41065
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Notices
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796–
7726, Ila.Mizrachi@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Draft Guidance for Industry on and
Food and Drug Administration Staff on
Dear Health Care Provider Letters:
Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information—(OMB
Control Number 0910–New)
This draft guidance provides
recommendations on when to use a Dear
Health Care Provider (DHCP) Letter, the
types of information to include in a
DHCP letter, how to organize that
information, and formatting techniques
to make the information more
accessible. The draft guidance is
intended to improve the quality of
DHCP letters to make them more
effective communication tools for new
information about marketed products.
In the Federal Register of November
12, 2010 (75 FR 69449), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the draft version of this
guidance. Eleven public comments were
received during the comment period
and in nine of the letters the following
two issues were raised. However, the
other two comments did not address the
information collection.
(Comment 1) Section V of the draft
guidance states that the target audience
should be all health care providers who
could not only prescribe the drug, but
who could also dispense or administer
the drugs. The comments call this an
expansion of the target audience, which
would require manufacturers to send
DHCP letters to physicians, nurses,
pharmacists, and other prescribing and
non-prescribing providers.
Manufacturers would also need to seek
out lists of such non-prescribing health
care providers proactively and
disseminate the letters more broadly
than to just physicians. A
recommendation was made to limit the
letters to prescribers only.
(Response) The regulation requires
manufacturers and distributors to mail
important information to ‘‘physicians
and others responsible for patient care’’.
(See 21 CFR 200.5) To the extent this
includes non-prescribing health care
professionals responsible for patient
care, the manufacturers should send
letters to relevant personnel. This is not
an expansion of the scope of the letters,
merely a clarification of the regulation
and a reflection of the health care
system today, which has a variety of
practitioners involved in patient care.
(Comment 2) In Section VI of the draft
guidance, FDA recommends that
companies conduct an evaluation of the
extent to which the target audience
received the DHCP letter and is aware
of the information that was
communicated in the letter. It also asked
manufacturers to assess the impact of
DHCP letters and their impact on
patient behavior. Comments found this
overly burdensome, beyond the
Agency’s statutory authority, and an
unnecessary increase in
correspondence, thereby potentially
diluting the impact of the DHCP letters.
(Response) We agree with the
comments. The final guidance has been
modified to suggest that manufacturers
conduct an evaluation, for their own
use, of the utility of the letters and their
success in reaching the target audiences.
Based on a review of MedWatch
Safety Alerts for 2008 and 2009, we
identified each Dear Health Care
Provider Letter sent and the identity of
each sponsor sending out a Dear Health
Care Provider Letter for each year. We
estimate that we will receive
approximately 30 Dear Health Care
Provider Letters annually from
approximately 25 application holders.
FDA professionals familiar with Dear
Health Care Provider Letters and with
the recommendations in the draft
guidance estimate that it should take an
application holder approximately 100
hours to prepare and send Dear Health
Care Provider Letters in accordance
with the draft guidance. Therefore we
estimate the annual reporting burden as
follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average
burden per
response
Total hours
25
1.20
30
100
3,000
Annual Average ...................................................................
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In the draft guidance, we refer to an
earlier guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Using Electronic Means to Distribute
Certain Product Information’’ (71 FR
26102; May 3, 2006). That guidance
referred to previously approved
collections of information found in FDA
regulations that are subject to review by
OMB. The collections of information in
that guidance have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0249.
Dated: July 2, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–16445 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
17:44 Jul 08, 2013
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0795]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Medical Devices;
Third-Party Review Under the Food
and Drug Administration
Modernization Act
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection associated
with medical devices third-party review
under the Food and Drug
Administration Modernization Act of
1997 (FDAMA).
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the collection of
information by September 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
E:\FR\FM\09JYN1.SGM
09JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41064-41065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16445]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-D-0319]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Draft Guidance for
Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff on Dear Health Care
Provider Letters: Improving Communication of Important Safety
Information
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by August
8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-NEW and
title ``Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration
Staff on Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information.'' Also include the FDA docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-
[[Page 41065]]
400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7726, Ila.Mizrachi@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Draft Guidance for Industry on and Food and Drug Administration Staff
on Dear Health Care Provider Letters: Improving Communication of
Important Safety Information--(OMB Control Number 0910-New)
This draft guidance provides recommendations on when to use a Dear
Health Care Provider (DHCP) Letter, the types of information to include
in a DHCP letter, how to organize that information, and formatting
techniques to make the information more accessible. The draft guidance
is intended to improve the quality of DHCP letters to make them more
effective communication tools for new information about marketed
products.
In the Federal Register of November 12, 2010 (75 FR 69449), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the draft
version of this guidance. Eleven public comments were received during
the comment period and in nine of the letters the following two issues
were raised. However, the other two comments did not address the
information collection.
(Comment 1) Section V of the draft guidance states that the target
audience should be all health care providers who could not only
prescribe the drug, but who could also dispense or administer the
drugs. The comments call this an expansion of the target audience,
which would require manufacturers to send DHCP letters to physicians,
nurses, pharmacists, and other prescribing and non-prescribing
providers. Manufacturers would also need to seek out lists of such non-
prescribing health care providers proactively and disseminate the
letters more broadly than to just physicians. A recommendation was made
to limit the letters to prescribers only.
(Response) The regulation requires manufacturers and distributors
to mail important information to ``physicians and others responsible
for patient care''. (See 21 CFR 200.5) To the extent this includes non-
prescribing health care professionals responsible for patient care, the
manufacturers should send letters to relevant personnel. This is not an
expansion of the scope of the letters, merely a clarification of the
regulation and a reflection of the health care system today, which has
a variety of practitioners involved in patient care.
(Comment 2) In Section VI of the draft guidance, FDA recommends
that companies conduct an evaluation of the extent to which the target
audience received the DHCP letter and is aware of the information that
was communicated in the letter. It also asked manufacturers to assess
the impact of DHCP letters and their impact on patient behavior.
Comments found this overly burdensome, beyond the Agency's statutory
authority, and an unnecessary increase in correspondence, thereby
potentially diluting the impact of the DHCP letters.
(Response) We agree with the comments. The final guidance has been
modified to suggest that manufacturers conduct an evaluation, for their
own use, of the utility of the letters and their success in reaching
the target audiences.
Based on a review of MedWatch Safety Alerts for 2008 and 2009, we
identified each Dear Health Care Provider Letter sent and the identity
of each sponsor sending out a Dear Health Care Provider Letter for each
year. We estimate that we will receive approximately 30 Dear Health
Care Provider Letters annually from approximately 25 application
holders. FDA professionals familiar with Dear Health Care Provider
Letters and with the recommendations in the draft guidance estimate
that it should take an application holder approximately 100 hours to
prepare and send Dear Health Care Provider Letters in accordance with
the draft guidance. Therefore we estimate the annual reporting burden
as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Average..................................................... 25 1.20 30 100 3,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
In the draft guidance, we refer to an earlier guidance for industry
entitled ``Using Electronic Means to Distribute Certain Product
Information'' (71 FR 26102; May 3, 2006). That guidance referred to
previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations
that are subject to review by OMB. The collections of information in
that guidance have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0249.
Dated: July 2, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-16445 Filed 7-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P