Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Mexico; Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter, 40966-40968 [2013-16345]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
40966
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
§ 177.04
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
[Amended]
2. In § 177.04(a), remove the text
‘‘§ 177.07(g)’’ and add, in its place, the
text ‘‘§ 177.07(f)’’.
■
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
§ 177.07
M. Environment
40 CFR Part 52
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under section 2.B.2, Figure 2–
1, paragraph 34(g), of the Instruction
because it involves regulations
establishing, disestablishing, or
changing RNAs. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
[EPA–R06–OAR–2009–0710; FRL–9831–1]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 177
Marine safety.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 177 as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable
Waters
PART 177—CORRECTION OF
ESPECIALLY HAZARDOUS
CONDITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 177
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 4302, 4311; Pub. L.
103–206, 107 Stat. 2439.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
[Amended]
3. In § 177.07, remove paragraph (f)
and redesignate paragraph (g) as new
paragraph (f).
■
§ 177.08
■
§ 177.09
■
[Removed]
4. Remove § 177.08.
[Redesignated as § 177.08]
5. Redesignate § 177.09 as § 177.08.
Dated: June 28, 2013.
Dana A. Goward,
Director, Marine Transportation Systems,
U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2013–16248 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
Mexico; Interstate Transport of Fine
Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a portion of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submittal from the State of New Mexico
to address Clean Air Act (CAA or Act)
requirements that prohibit air emissions
which will contribute significantly to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance in any other state for the
2006 fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS). EPA has determined that the
existing SIP for New Mexico contains
adequate provisions to prohibit air
emissions from significantly
contributing to nonattainment or
interfering with maintenance of the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS (2006 PM2.5
NAAQS) in any other state as required
by the Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2009–0710. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 Freedom of
Information Act Review Room between
the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
weekdays except for legal holidays.
Contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below to make an
appointment. If possible, please make
the appointment at least two working
days in advance of your visit. There will
be a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
Mr.
Carl Young, Air Planning Section (6PD–
L), U.S. EPA Region 6, 214–665–6645,
young.carl@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The background for today’s action is
discussed in detail in our March 12,
2013 proposal (78 FR 15664). In that
notice, we proposed to approve a
portion of a SIP submittal dated June 12,
2009, from the State of New Mexico to
address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
requirements that prohibit air emissions
which will contribute significantly to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance in any other state for the
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Specifically, we
proposed to determine that the existing
SIP for New Mexico contains adequate
provisions to prohibit air emissions
from significantly contributing to
nonattainment or interfering with
maintenance of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
We received one comment from a
citizen supporting our proposal. The
comment letter is available for review in
the docket for this rulemaking. We did
not receive any adverse comments
regarding our proposal.
E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM
09JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
II. Final Action
We are approving a portion of a SIP
submittal for the State of New Mexico
submitted by the Governor on June 12,
2009, to address interstate transport for
the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Based on EPA’s
evaluation of the State’s technical
analysis addressing the requirements of
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS, with EPA’s additional
analysis and technical information, we
approve the portion of the June 12, 2009
SIP submittal determining the existing
SIP for New Mexico contains adequate
provisions to prohibit air emissions
from contributing significantly to
nonattainment or interfering with
maintenance of the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS
in any other state as required by CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). This action is
being taken under section 110 of the
Act.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 08, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40967
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 9,
2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposed of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG—New Mexico
2. The second table in § 52.1620(e)
entitled ‘‘EPA-Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures in the New Mexico SIP’’ is
amended by revising the entry for
‘‘Infrastructure for 2006 PM2.5 and
Interstate Transport regarding
noninterference with other states’
programs for PSD for the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1620
*
Identification of plan
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM
09JYR1
*
*
40968
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 9, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
Infrastructure for 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS.
*
*
Statewide, except for
Bernalillo County and
Indian country.
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0190; FRL–9830–8]
Notice of Extension of Deadline to
Commence Construction Under Clean
Air Act Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Permit Issued to Avenal
Power Center, LLC
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’) has extended the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(‘‘PSD’’) permit deadline for
commencing construction for a final
Clean Air Act PSD permit that
authorizes Avenal Power Center, LLC
(‘‘APC’’) to construct the Avenal Energy
Project (‘‘AEP’’). The AEP is to be
located in Kings County, California.
DATES: EPA’s PSD permit for the AEP
became effective on August 18, 2011,
and included a deadline for
commencing construction of February
18, 2013. Prior to February 18, 2013,
APC requested an 18-month extension
of the deadline for commencing
construction under the PSD permit for
the AEP. EPA has granted such an
extension until August 18, 2014.
Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1),
judicial review of this extension
decision may be sought by filing a
petition for review in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
by September 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0190 for
this action. Generally, documents in the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
16:51 Jul 08, 2013
*
6/12/2009
*
[FR Doc. 2013–16345 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
State submittal/
effective date
Jkt 229001
*
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
7/9/2013 [Insert FR page number where document begins].
*
1/22/2013, (78 FR 4337):
Approval for 110(a)(2)(A),
(B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (PSD
portion), (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M). 7/9/2013, ([Insert FR
page number where document begins]): Approval
for 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
*
docket for this action are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the following address: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105–3901. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more
information about how to make an
appointment to view these hard copy
documents during normal business
hours at EPA Region IX’s office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shirley Rivera, Air Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San
Francisco, CA 94105, 415–972–3966,
rivera.shirley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The AEP,
proposed by APC, is a new 600megawatt natural gas-fired combinedcycle power plant that will be located in
Kings County, California. The PSD
permit decision issued by EPA for the
AEP became effective on August 18,
2011 as published in the Federal
Register on September 9, 2011 (76 FR
55799). In November 2011, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit received petitions for review of
EPA’s PSD permit decision for the AEP;
this Court of Appeals proceeding is
pending. In letters dated December 19,
2012 and February 15, 2013, APC
requested that EPA provide an 18month extension of the deadline for
commencing construction in the PSD
permit for the AEP. Pursuant to 40 CFR
Part 52.21(r), in a response to APC dated
June 26, 2013, EPA Region 9 determined
that a satisfactory showing justifying the
extension had been made, and EPA
extended the deadline for commencing
construction in the PSD permit for AEP
for 18 months, so that the PSD permit
will become invalid if construction of
the AEP is not commenced by August
18, 2014.
The docket for this action includes,
among other documents, EPA’s analysis
supporting this action. In addition to the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
electronic docket for this action, hard
copy versions of the docket materials
are available for public inspection
during normal business hours at the
following address: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. To arrange for viewing of these
documents at EPA Region IX’s office,
call Shirley Rivera at (415) 972–3966.
Due to building security procedures,
visitors should call at least 48 hours in
advance to arrange a visit.
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Deborah Jordan,
Director, Air Division, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2013–16334 Filed 7–8–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket No. 11–42; DA 13–1441]
Lifeline and Link Up Modernization and
Reform
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this Order, the Wireline
Competition Bureau (Bureau)
underscores certain compliance
requirements that are contained in the
Lifeline Reform Order and its
accompanying rules. The Bureau
codifies the Commission’s requirement
that eligible telecommunications
carriers (ETCs) verify a Lifeline
subscriber’s eligibility for Lifeline
service before activating such service,
pursuant to the authority delegated in
the Lifeline Reform Order.
DATES: Effective August 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Radhika Karmarkar, Wireline
Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400 or
TTY: (202) 418–0484.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM
09JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 9, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40966-40968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16345]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2009-0710; FRL-9831-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
New Mexico; Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a portion of a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submittal from the State of New Mexico to address Clean Air Act
(CAA or Act) requirements that prohibit air emissions which will
contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance
in any other state for the 2006 fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). EPA
has determined that the existing SIP for New Mexico contains adequate
provisions to prohibit air emissions from significantly contributing to
nonattainment or interfering with maintenance of the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS (2006 PM2.5 NAAQS) in any other state
as required by the Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 8, 2013.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R06-OAR-2009-0710. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 Freedom
of Information Act Review Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30
p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below to make an
appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two
working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page
fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit,
please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Carl Young, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), U.S. EPA Region 6, 214-665-6645, young.carl@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' means EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The background for today's action is discussed in detail in our
March 12, 2013 proposal (78 FR 15664). In that notice, we proposed to
approve a portion of a SIP submittal dated June 12, 2009, from the
State of New Mexico to address CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
requirements that prohibit air emissions which will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance in any
other state for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Specifically, we
proposed to determine that the existing SIP for New Mexico contains
adequate provisions to prohibit air emissions from significantly
contributing to nonattainment or interfering with maintenance of the
2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. We received one comment from a citizen
supporting our proposal. The comment letter is available for review in
the docket for this rulemaking. We did not receive any adverse comments
regarding our proposal.
[[Page 40967]]
II. Final Action
We are approving a portion of a SIP submittal for the State of New
Mexico submitted by the Governor on June 12, 2009, to address
interstate transport for the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Based on
EPA's evaluation of the State's technical analysis addressing the
requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS, with EPA's additional analysis and technical
information, we approve the portion of the June 12, 2009 SIP submittal
determining the existing SIP for New Mexico contains adequate
provisions to prohibit air emissions from contributing significantly to
nonattainment or interfering with maintenance of the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS in any other state as required by CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). This action is being taken under section 110 of the
Act.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 9, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposed of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG--New Mexico
0
2. The second table in Sec. 52.1620(e) entitled ``EPA-Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New
Mexico SIP'' is amended by revising the entry for ``Infrastructure for
2006 PM2.5 and Interstate Transport regarding
noninterference with other states' programs for PSD for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1620 Identification of plan
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 40968]]
EPA-Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic State submittal/
Name of SIP provision or nonattainment area effective date EPA approval date Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Infrastructure for 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Statewide, except for 6/12/2009 7/9/2013 [Insert FR page 1/22/2013, (78 FR 4337): Approval for
Bernalillo County and number where document 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II) (PSD
Indian country. begins]. portion), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L), and (M). 7/9/2013,
([Insert FR page number where document
begins]): Approval for
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2013-16345 Filed 7-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
