Delegation of Authority to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe To Implement and Enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards, 40663-40664 [2013-16328]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule
pertaining to the redesignation of the
West Virginia portion of the
Parkersburg-Marietta WV–OH 1997
annual PM2.5 nonattainment area, does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness Areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dated: June 13, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40663
[FR Doc. 2013–16060 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules Section of this
Federal Register for detailed instruction
on how to submit comments.
BILLING CODE P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
40 CFR Part 60, 61, and 63
Kyle
Olson, Air Program, Mailcode 8P–AR,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6002
or olson.kyle@epa.gov.
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0764; FRL–9828–5]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Delegation of Authority to the
Southern Ute Indian Tribe To
Implement and Enforce National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants and New Source
Performance Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve the Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s
(SUIT) July 3, 2012 request for
delegation of authority to implement
and enforce National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) and New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS). This
request establishes and requires SUIT to
administer a NSPS and NESHAPs
program per EPA regulations. The
delegation is facilitated by SUIT’s
treatment ‘‘in the same manner as a
state’’ (TAS) document, per CAA
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before August 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2012–0764, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: olson.kyle@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director,
Air Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA is
taking final action approving Southern
Ute Indian Tribe’s (SUIT) July 3, 2012
request for delegation of authority to
implement and enforce National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS). This
request establishes and requires SUIT to
administer a NSPS and NESHAPs
program per EPA regulations. SUIT met
the requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA)
sections 111(c) and 112(l) and 40 CFR
Subpart E for full approval to administer
CAA 111 and CAA 112 programs
entirely due to its prior approval of its
CAA Title V Part 70 Permitting Program.
The delegation is facilitated by SUIT’s
treatment ‘‘in the same manner as a
state’’ (TAS) document, per CAA section
301(d)(2). This action is being taken
under section 111 and 112 of the CAA.
In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
approving the delegation as a direct
final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial delegation and
anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set
forth in the preamble to the direct final
rule. If EPA receives no adverse
comments, EPA will not take further
action on this proposed rule. If EPA
receives adverse comments, EPA will
withdraw the direct final rule and it will
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. See the information
provided in the direct final action of the
same title which is located in the Rules
and Regulations Section of this Federal
Register.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40664
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Dated: May 30, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013–16328 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts
National Endowment for the
Humanities
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
45 CFR Part 1100
RIN 3135–AA26; 3136–AA31; 3137–AA23
Statement for the Guidance of the
Public—Organization, Procedure and
Availability of Information
National Endowment for the
Arts, National Endowment for the
Humanities, and Institute of Museum
and Library Services.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The National Endowment for
the Arts (NEA), the National
Endowment for the Humanities (NEH),
and the Institute of Museum and Library
Services (IMLS) are proposing to amend
their joint Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) regulations, to remove any
reference to the NEH, the Federal
Council on the Arts and the Humanities
(FCAH), an agency for which the NEH
provides legal counsel, and the IMLS.
The NEA, the NEH and the IMLS are
amending these joint regulations
because each agency has proposed or
plans to propose its own separate FOIA
regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked and electronic comments
must be submitted on or before
September 6, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: Gencounsel@neh.gov. Please
include ‘‘NFAH FOIA Regulations’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• FAX: (202) 606–8600. Please send
your comments to the attention of Gina
Raimond.
• Mail: Gina Raimond, Attorney
Advisor, Office of the General Counsel,
National Endowment for the
Humanities, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Room 529, Washington, DC 20506.
To ensure proper handling, please
reference ‘‘NFAH FOIA Regulations’’ on
your correspondence.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
Gina
Raimond, Attorney Advisor, Office of
the General Counsel, National
Endowment for the Humanities, 202–
606–8322.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NEA,
the NEH, the IMLS, and the FCAH make
up the National Foundation on the Arts
and Humanities (Foundation). The
Foundation was established by the
National Foundation on the Arts and
Humanities Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 951
et seq. The NEA, the NEH (for itself and
on behalf of the FCAH), and the former
Institute of Museum Services (now, the
IMLS) last revised the joint regulations
on December 21, 1987. Each of these
agencies has now decided to issue
separate FOIA regulations; therefore,
they are proposing to amend 45 CFR
part 1100. At this time, NEH has
proposed new FOIA regulations for
itself and the FCAH in 45 CFR part
1171, and IMLS has proposed new FOIA
regulations for itself in 45 CFR part
1184. NEA intends to propose new
FOIA regulations for itself in 45 CFR
part 1160.
amended. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
NEA, NEH, and IMLS have
determined that the proposed rule is not
a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866 and therefore is
not subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Review.
PART 1100—STATEMENT FOR THE
GUIDANCE OF THE PUBLIC—
ORGANIZATION, PROCEDURE AND
AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), NEA,
NEH, and IMLS have determined that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Under the FOIA, agencies may recover
only the direct costs of searching for,
reviewing, and duplicating the records
that agencies process for requesters.
Thus, fees assessed for processing FOIA
requests are nominal.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
For purposes of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–4, the proposed rule will not
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year,
and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed rule is not a major rule
as defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804, as
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act
NEA, NEH, and IMLS have
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
does not apply to the proposed rule
because the rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require OMB approval.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of Information.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the NEA, the NEH (for itself
and on behalf of the FCAH), and the
IMLS propose to amend 45 CFR part
1100 as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 1100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended by
Pub. L. 99–570, 100 Stat. 3207.
2. In § 1100.1 revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 1100.1
Definitions.
(a) Agency means the National
Endowment for the Arts.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 1100.2 to read as follows:
§ 1100.2
Organization.
The National Foundation on the Arts
and the Humanities was established by
the National Foundation on the Arts and
the Humanities Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C.
951 et seq. The Foundation is composed
of the National Endowment for the Arts,
the National Endowment for the
Humanities, the Institute of Museum
and Library Services, and the Federal
Council on the Arts and the Humanities.
The Institute of Museum and Library
Services became a part of the National
Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities pursuant to the Museum
and Library Services Act, as amended
(20 U.S.C. 9102). Each Endowment is
headed by a Chairman and has an
advisory national council composed of
26 presidential appointees. The Institute
of Museum and Library Services is
headed by a Director and has a National
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40663-40664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16328]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60, 61, and 63
[EPA-R08-OAR-2012-0764; FRL-9828-5]
Delegation of Authority to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe To
Implement and Enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve the Southern Ute Indian
Tribe's (SUIT) July 3, 2012 request for delegation of authority to
implement and enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). This
request establishes and requires SUIT to administer a NSPS and NESHAPs
program per EPA regulations. The delegation is facilitated by SUIT's
treatment ``in the same manner as a state'' (TAS) document, per CAA
requirements.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 7, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2012-0764, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: olson.kyle@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director, Air Program,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are only
accepted Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
Section of this Federal Register for detailed instruction on how to
submit comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Olson, Air Program, Mailcode 8P-
AR, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6002 or
olson.kyle@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is taking final action approving
Southern Ute Indian Tribe's (SUIT) July 3, 2012 request for delegation
of authority to implement and enforce National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS). This request establishes and requires SUIT to administer a NSPS
and NESHAPs program per EPA regulations. SUIT met the requirements of
Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 111(c) and 112(l) and 40 CFR Subpart E for
full approval to administer CAA 111 and CAA 112 programs entirely due
to its prior approval of its CAA Title V Part 70 Permitting Program.
The delegation is facilitated by SUIT's treatment ``in the same manner
as a state'' (TAS) document, per CAA section 301(d)(2). This action is
being taken under section 111 and 112 of the CAA.
In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register,
EPA is approving the delegation as a direct final rule without prior
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial delegation
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the preamble to the direct final rule. If EPA
receives no adverse comments, EPA will not take further action on this
proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA will withdraw the
direct final rule and it will not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule.
EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note
that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or
section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. See the
information provided in the direct final action of the same title which
is located in the Rules and Regulations Section of this Federal
Register.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 40664]]
Dated: May 30, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013-16328 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P