Delegation of Authority to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe To Implement and Enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards, 40635-40638 [2013-16327]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
contact the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so.
The Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Vessel operators given permission to
enter or operate in the safety zone must
comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013–16249 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0228]
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan Including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, and
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel,
Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon
Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship
Canal from Mile Marker 296.1 to Mile
Marker 296.7 at specified times on July
15 through July 19, 2013. This action is
necessary to protect the waterways,
waterway users, and vessels from
hazards associated with the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) dispersal
barriers performance testing.
During the enforcement periods listed
below, entry into, transiting, mooring,
laying-up or anchoring within the
enforced area of this safety zone by any
person or vessel is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, or his designated
representative.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
The regulations in 33 CFR
165.930 will be enforced at the times
specified in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
40635
or email MST1 Joseph McCollum,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, telephone 414–
747–7148, email address
joseph.p.mccollum@uscg.mil.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
The Coast
Guard will enforce a segment of the
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel, Chicago, IL,
listed in 33 CFR 165.930 for the USACE
performance testing at the dispersal
barriers. The Coast Guard will enforce
this safety zone between Mile Marker
296.1 to Mile Marker 296.7 on all waters
of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal
according to the following schedule:
(1) Dispersal Barrier performance
testing schedule.
July 15, 2013, from 1 p.m. until 5
p.m.;
July 16, 2013, from 7 a.m. until 11
a.m. and 1 p.m. until 5 p.m.;
July 17, 2013, from 7 a.m. until 11
a.m. and 1 p.m. until 5 p.m.;
July 18, 2013, from 7 a.m. until 11
a.m. and 1 p.m. until 5 p.m.;
July 19, 2013, from 7 a.m. until 11
a.m.
This enforcement action is necessary
because the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan has determined that the
USACE Dispersal Barriers performance
testing poses risks to life and property.
Because of these risks, it is necessary to
control vessel movement during the
testing to prevent injury and property
loss.
In accordance with the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
into, transiting, mooring, laying up or
anchoring within the enforced area of
this safety zone by any person or vessel
is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his designated representative. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his designated representative may be
contacted via the U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan Command Center
at 414–747–7182 or on VHF channel 16.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.930 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, will also provide notice
through other means, which may
include Broadcast Notice to Mariners,
Local Notice to Mariners, local news
media, distribution in leaflet form, and
on-scene oral notice.
Additionally, the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, may notify
representatives from the maritime
industry through telephonic and email
notifications.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[FR Doc. 2013–16251 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60, 61, and 63
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0764; FRL–9828–6]
Delegation of Authority to the
Southern Ute Indian Tribe To
Implement and Enforce National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants and New Source
Performance Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking final action to
approve the Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s
(SUIT) July 3, 2012 request for
delegation of authority to implement
and enforce National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) and New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS). This
request establishes and requires SUIT to
administer a NSPS and NESHAPs
program per EPA regulations. The
delegation is facilitated by SUIT’s
treatment ‘‘in the same manner as a
state’’ (TAS) document, per CAA
requirements.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on
September 6, 2013 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by August 7, 2013. If adverse
comment is received, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take
effect.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2012–0764, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: olson.kyle@epa.gov.
• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
• Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air
Program, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129.
• Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director,
Air Program, Environmental Protection
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
40636
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–
AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0764.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on
submitting comments, go to Section I.
General Information of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle
Olson, Air Program, Mailcode 8P–AR,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6002
or olson.kyle@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is
taking final action to approve the
Southern Ute Indian Tribe’s (SUIT) July
3, 2012 request for delegation of
authority to implement and enforce
National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
and New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS). This request establishes and
requires SUIT to administer a NSPS and
NESHAPs program per EPA regulations.
SUIT met the requirements of Clean Air
Act (CAA) sections 111(c) and 112(l)
and 40 CFR subpart E for full approval
to administer CAA 111 and CAA 112
programs entirely due to its prior
approval of its CAA Title V Part 70
Permitting Program. The delegation is
facilitated by SUIT’s treatment ‘‘in the
same manner as a state’’ (TAS)
document, per CAA section 301(d)(2).
This action is being taken under CAA
sections 111 and 112.
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Delegation of Authority to SUIT
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are
giving meaning to certain words or initials as
follows: (i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the
context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or
refer to the United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
(iii) The word NESHAP means or refers to
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants.
(iv) The word NSPS means or refers to the
New Source Performance Standards.
(v) The word SUIT means or refers to the
Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
(vi) The word TAS means or refers to
Treatment As a State
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD ROM the specific information that is
claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Delegation of Authority to SUIT
CAA sections 111(c)(1) and 112(l), as
amended, authorize EPA to delegate
authority to any state or tribal agency
which submits adequate regulatory
procedures for implementation and
enforcement of the NSPS and NESHAP.
The NSPS are codified in 40 CFR part
60 and the NESHAP are codified in 40
CFR part 63. Delegation confers primary
responsibility for implementation and
enforcement to the respective tribal
agency; however, EPA also retains the
concurrent authority to enforce the
standards.
With a July 3, 2012 letter, the
Chairman of the Southern Ute Indian
Tribe requested delegation of authority
for NSPS and NESHAP, promulgated in
Parts 2 and 3 of the SUIT Reservation
Air Program. EPA’s review of SUIT’s
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
program determined that it contained
adequate and effective procedures for
the implementation and enforcement of
these federal standards. Therefore, on
November 27, 2012, EPA Region 8
notified SUIT that, pending publication
in the Federal Register, the Tribe is
authorized to accept delegation of NSPS
and NESHAP standards with the
following letter:
‘‘The Honorable Jimmy R. Newton Jr.,
Chairman
The Southern Ute Indian Tribe
P.O. Box 737
Ignacio, Colorado 81137–0737
Re: Clean Air Act (CAA) 111 and 112, New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
Program Approval
Dear Chairman Newton:
I am pleased to inform you that, because
the Southern Ute Indian Tribe has an
approved CAA Title V permitting program,
the EPA finds that the Tribe has the authority
to carry out NSPS (CAA 111) and NESHAP
(CAA 112) regulatory activities, and that the
Tribe can begin requesting delegation of
specific NSPS & NESHAP standards. The
Tribe’s treatment ‘‘in the same manner as a
state’’ document has been updated to reflect
this new Program approval (per CAA section
301(d)(2) and 40 CFR 49.6.)
NSPS establishes maximum emission
levels for new stationary sources, and
NESHAPs address the control of hazardous
air pollutants through Maximum Achievable
Control Technology (MACT) standards and
related programs that enhance and support
the NESHAP program. The Tribe is also
granted automatic delegation of NESHAP
(CAA 112) standards through incorporation
by reference of the standards when they are
adopted unchanged into the Reservation Air
Code (RAC) from the federal standards. A
request for delegation of specific NSPS (CAA
111) standards will require a letter to the
EPA. After such request the EPA would
publish a Federal Register notice containing
the letter of request and an updated Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) table, and the EPA
would respond by letter to the Tribe.
To approve future requests for delegation
of NSPS and NESHAPS regulations the EPA
will provide public notice through
publication in the Federal Register as a
direct final rule. A direct final rule makes
CAA 111 and CAA 112 delegations effective
the day of publication. However, should the
EPA receive any adverse comments on the
direct final rule, the delegation will be
reconsidered.
For more information on this approval,
please contact Carl Daly, Director of Region
8’s Air Program at (303) 312–6416.
Sincerely,
James B. Martin
Regional Administrator’’
III. Summary of Final Action
We are approving delegation of the
CAA 111 and 112 programs (NSPS and
NESHAP, respectively) to SUIT. We are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
approving this rule because the
authority for this delegation is based
entirely on SUIT’s previous approval of
the Part 70 permitting program [EPA–
R08–OAR–2011–0015; FRL–9277–9]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
Tribal law as meeting federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
Tribal law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This action also does not have
federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it approves a Tribal rule
implementing a Federal standard.
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000), requires us
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications’’. ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes’’. Under
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40637
Section 5(b) of Executive Order 13175,
we may not issue a regulation that has
tribal implications, that imposes
substantial direct compliance costs, and
that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal Government provides the
funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by tribal
governments, or we consult with tribal
officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation.
Under Section 5(c) of Executive Order
13175, we may not issue a regulation
that has tribal implications and that
preempts tribal law, unless the Agency
consults with tribal officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. While we conclude that this
action will have tribal implications, this
action is not a regulation and merely
approves a Tribal rule implementing a
federal standard. This action does not
alter the relationship or the distribution
of power and responsibilities
established in the Clean Air Act except
as regards implementation of CAA 111
and 112. This action will neither impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
tribal governments, nor preempt tribal
law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq, as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 3,
2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
40638
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60, 61,
and 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum,
Ammonium sulfate plants, Batteries,
Beverages, Carbon monoxide, Cement
industry, Chemicals, Coal, Copper, Dry
cleaners, Electric power plants,
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Gasoline, Glass
and glass products, Grains, Graphic arts
industry, Heaters, Household
appliances, Insulation,
Intergovernmental relations, Iron,
Labeling, Lead, Lime, Metallic and
nonmetallic mineral processing plants,
Metals, Motor vehicles, National
Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants, Natural gas, New Source
Performance Standards, Nitric acid
plants, Nitrogen dioxide, Paper and
paper products industry, Particulate
matter, Paving and roofing materials,
Petroleum, Phosphate, Plastics materials
and synthetics, Polymers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sewage
disposal, Steel, Sulfur oxides, Sulfuric
acid plants, Tires, Tribal, Urethane,
Vinyl, Volatile organic compounds,
Waste treatment and disposal, Zinc.
Dated: May 30, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013–16327 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 120918468–3111–02]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 0648–XC741
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Dusky Rockfish in the
Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf of
Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for dusky rockfish in the
Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA). This action is necessary
to prevent exceeding the 2013 total
allowable catch (TAC) of dusky rockfish
in the Western Regulatory Area of the
GOA.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), July 3, 2013, through 2400
hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Whitney, 907–586–7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of
Alaska (FMP) prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. Regulations governing
fishing by U.S. vessels in accordance
with the FMP appear at subpart H of 50
CFR part 600 and 50 CFR part 679.
The 2013 TAC of dusky rockfish in
the Western Regulatory Area of the GOA
is 377 metric tons (mt) as established by
the final 2013 and 2014 harvest
specifications for groundfish of the GOA
(78 FR 13162, February 26, 2013).
In accordance with § 679.20(d)(1)(i),
the Administrator, Alaska Region,
NMFS (Regional Administrator), has
determined that the 2013 TAC of dusky
rockfish in the Western Regulatory Area
of the GOA will soon be reached.
Therefore, the Regional Administrator is
establishing a directed fishing
allowance of 277 mt, and is setting aside
the remaining 100 mt as bycatch to
support other anticipated groundfish
fisheries. In accordance with
§ 679.20(d)(1)(iii), the Regional
Administrator finds that this directed
fishing allowance has been reached.
Consequently, NMFS is prohibiting
directed fishing for dusky rockfish in
the Western Regulatory Area of the
GOA.
After the effective date of this closure
the maximum retainable amounts at
§ 679.20(e) and (f) will apply at all times
during a trip.
SUMMARY:
Classification
This action responds to the best
available information recently obtained
from the fishery. The acting Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA), finds good cause to waive the
requirement to provide prior notice and
opportunity for public comment
pursuant to the authority set forth at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. This requirement is
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest as it would prevent NMFS from
responding to the most recent fisheries
data in a timely fashion and would
delay the closure of directed fishing for
dusky rockfish in the Western
Regulatory Area of the GOA. NMFS was
unable to publish a notice providing
time for public comment because the
most recent, relevant data only became
available as of July 1, 2013.
The AA also finds good cause to
waive the 30-day delay in the effective
date of this action under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). This finding is based upon
the reasons provided above for waiver of
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment.
This action is required by § 679.20
and is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: July 2, 2013.
Kelly Denit,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–16286 Filed 7–2–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 120918468–3111–02]
RIN 0648–XC740
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Northern Rockfish in
the Western Regulatory Area of the
Gulf of Alaska
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS is prohibiting directed
fishing for northern rockfish in the
Western Regulatory Area of the Gulf of
Alaska (GOA). This action is necessary
to prevent exceeding the 2013 total
allowable catch (TAC) of northern
rockfish in the Western Regulatory Area
of the GOA.
DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local
time (A.l.t.), July 3, 2013, through 2400
hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Whitney, 907–586–7269.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the groundfish fishery in the
GOA exclusive economic zone
according to the Fishery Management
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40635-40638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16327]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60, 61, and 63
[EPA-R08-OAR-2012-0764; FRL-9828-6]
Delegation of Authority to the Southern Ute Indian Tribe To
Implement and Enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants and New Source Performance Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve the Southern Ute Indian
Tribe's (SUIT) July 3, 2012 request for delegation of authority to
implement and enforce National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). This
request establishes and requires SUIT to administer a NSPS and NESHAPs
program per EPA regulations. The delegation is facilitated by SUIT's
treatment ``in the same manner as a state'' (TAS) document, per CAA
requirements.
DATES: This rule is effective on September 6, 2013 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by August 7, 2013. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2012-0764, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: olson.kyle@epa.gov.
Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please alert the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Carl Daly, Director, Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202-1129.
Hand Delivery: Carl Daly, Director, Air Program,
Environmental Protection
[[Page 40636]]
Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202-1129. Such deliveries are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket EPA-R08-OAR-2012-0764.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or
email. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to EPA, without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to
Section I. General Information of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at
all possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Olson, Air Program, Mailcode 8P-
AR, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6002 or
olson.kyle@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is taking final action to approve the
Southern Ute Indian Tribe's (SUIT) July 3, 2012 request for delegation
of authority to implement and enforce National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS). This request establishes and requires SUIT to administer a NSPS
and NESHAPs program per EPA regulations. SUIT met the requirements of
Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 111(c) and 112(l) and 40 CFR subpart E for
full approval to administer CAA 111 and CAA 112 programs entirely due
to its prior approval of its CAA Title V Part 70 Permitting Program.
The delegation is facilitated by SUIT's treatment ``in the same manner
as a state'' (TAS) document, per CAA section 301(d)(2). This action is
being taken under CAA sections 111 and 112.
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Delegation of Authority to SUIT
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to
certain words or initials as follows: (i) The words or initials Act
or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context
indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iii) The word NESHAP means or refers to National Emissions
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
(iv) The word NSPS means or refers to the New Source Performance
Standards.
(v) The word SUIT means or refers to the Southern Ute Indian
Tribe.
(vi) The word TAS means or refers to Treatment As a State
I. General Information
A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. Delegation of Authority to SUIT
CAA sections 111(c)(1) and 112(l), as amended, authorize EPA to
delegate authority to any state or tribal agency which submits adequate
regulatory procedures for implementation and enforcement of the NSPS
and NESHAP. The NSPS are codified in 40 CFR part 60 and the NESHAP are
codified in 40 CFR part 63. Delegation confers primary responsibility
for implementation and enforcement to the respective tribal agency;
however, EPA also retains the concurrent authority to enforce the
standards.
With a July 3, 2012 letter, the Chairman of the Southern Ute Indian
Tribe requested delegation of authority for NSPS and NESHAP,
promulgated in Parts 2 and 3 of the SUIT Reservation Air Program. EPA's
review of SUIT's
[[Page 40637]]
program determined that it contained adequate and effective procedures
for the implementation and enforcement of these federal standards.
Therefore, on November 27, 2012, EPA Region 8 notified SUIT that,
pending publication in the Federal Register, the Tribe is authorized to
accept delegation of NSPS and NESHAP standards with the following
letter:
``The Honorable Jimmy R. Newton Jr., Chairman
The Southern Ute Indian Tribe
P.O. Box 737
Ignacio, Colorado 81137-0737
Re: Clean Air Act (CAA) 111 and 112, New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) Program Approval
Dear Chairman Newton:
I am pleased to inform you that, because the Southern Ute Indian
Tribe has an approved CAA Title V permitting program, the EPA finds
that the Tribe has the authority to carry out NSPS (CAA 111) and
NESHAP (CAA 112) regulatory activities, and that the Tribe can begin
requesting delegation of specific NSPS & NESHAP standards. The
Tribe's treatment ``in the same manner as a state'' document has
been updated to reflect this new Program approval (per CAA section
301(d)(2) and 40 CFR 49.6.)
NSPS establishes maximum emission levels for new stationary
sources, and NESHAPs address the control of hazardous air pollutants
through Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standards and
related programs that enhance and support the NESHAP program. The
Tribe is also granted automatic delegation of NESHAP (CAA 112)
standards through incorporation by reference of the standards when
they are adopted unchanged into the Reservation Air Code (RAC) from
the federal standards. A request for delegation of specific NSPS
(CAA 111) standards will require a letter to the EPA. After such
request the EPA would publish a Federal Register notice containing
the letter of request and an updated Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) table, and the EPA would respond by letter to the Tribe.
To approve future requests for delegation of NSPS and NESHAPS
regulations the EPA will provide public notice through publication
in the Federal Register as a direct final rule. A direct final rule
makes CAA 111 and CAA 112 delegations effective the day of
publication. However, should the EPA receive any adverse comments on
the direct final rule, the delegation will be reconsidered.
For more information on this approval, please contact Carl Daly,
Director of Region 8's Air Program at (303) 312-6416.
Sincerely,
James B. Martin
Regional Administrator''
III. Summary of Final Action
We are approving delegation of the CAA 111 and 112 programs (NSPS
and NESHAP, respectively) to SUIT. We are approving this rule because
the authority for this delegation is based entirely on SUIT's previous
approval of the Part 70 permitting program [EPA-R08-OAR-2011-0015; FRL-
9277-9]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves Tribal law as meeting federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by Tribal law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty, it does not contain any unfunded mandate
or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This action also does not have federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a Tribal
rule implementing a Federal standard.
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000),
requires us to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications''. ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes''. Under Section 5(b) of Executive
Order 13175, we may not issue a regulation that has tribal
implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance costs, and
that is not required by statute, unless the Federal Government provides
the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by
tribal governments, or we consult with tribal officials early in the
process of developing the proposed regulation. Under Section 5(c) of
Executive Order 13175, we may not issue a regulation that has tribal
implications and that preempts tribal law, unless the Agency consults
with tribal officials early in the process of developing the proposed
regulation. While we conclude that this action will have tribal
implications, this action is not a regulation and merely approves a
Tribal rule implementing a federal standard. This action does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established in the Clean Air Act except as regards implementation of
CAA 111 and 112. This action will neither impose substantial direct
compliance costs on tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq, as added
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 3, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules
[[Page 40638]]
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60, 61, and 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Ammonium sulfate plants, Batteries,
Beverages, Carbon monoxide, Cement industry, Chemicals, Coal, Copper,
Dry cleaners, Electric power plants, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Gasoline,
Glass and glass products, Grains, Graphic arts industry, Heaters,
Household appliances, Insulation, Intergovernmental relations, Iron,
Labeling, Lead, Lime, Metallic and nonmetallic mineral processing
plants, Metals, Motor vehicles, National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants, Natural gas, New Source Performance
Standards, Nitric acid plants, Nitrogen dioxide, Paper and paper
products industry, Particulate matter, Paving and roofing materials,
Petroleum, Phosphate, Plastics materials and synthetics, Polymers,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sewage disposal, Steel,
Sulfur oxides, Sulfuric acid plants, Tires, Tribal, Urethane, Vinyl,
Volatile organic compounds, Waste treatment and disposal, Zinc.
Dated: May 30, 2013.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2013-16327 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P