Regulated Navigation Area; Special Buzzards Bay Vessel Regulation, Buzzards Bay, MA, 40651-40654 [2013-16252]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
duty road known locally as Westlake
Boulevard, section 26, T1N/R19W; then
(27) Proceed northeasterly on
Westlake Boulevard approximately 0.4
mile to the road’s second intersection
with the 900-foot elevation line, section
26, T1N/R19W; then
(28) Proceed easterly along the 900foot elevation line, crossing the Los
Angeles County-Ventura County
boundary, to the elevation line’s
intersection with the boundary of the
Las Virgenes Land Grant (concurrent at
this point with the northern boundary of
section 31, T1N/R18W); then
(29) Proceed northeasterly along the
Las Virgenes Land Grant boundary
approximately 0.3 mile, crossing
Triunfo Canyon, to the boundary’s
intersection with the 1,000-foot
elevation line; then
(30) Proceed westerly and then eastnortheasterly along the 1,000-foot
elevation line to the line’s intersection
with the Las Virgenes Land Grant
boundary, and then continue
northeasterly along the Las Virgenes
Land Grant boundary approximately 0.2
mile to the boundary’s intersection with
U.S. Highway 101 (Ventura Freeway);
then
(31) Proceed easterly on U.S. Highway
101 (Ventura Freeway) approximately
5.7 miles, crossing onto the Calabasas
map, to the highway’s intersection with
the northern boundary of section 30,
T1N/R17, near Brents Junction; then
(32) Proceed west along the northern
boundary of section 30, T1N/R17W
approximately 0.5 mile to its
intersection with the 1,000-foot
elevation line; then
(33) Proceed northerly, southerly, and
easterly along the meandering 1,000-foot
elevation line, encompassing portions of
Las Virgenes, East Las Virgenes, and
Gates Canyons, to the elevation line’s
intersection with the western boundary
of section 21, T1N/R17W; then
(34) Proceed north along the western
boundaries of sections 21 and 16, T1N/
R17W, to the section line’s intersection
with the Los Angeles County-Ventura
County boundary line; then
(35) Proceed east along the Los
Angeles County-Ventura County
boundary line approximately 0.45 mile,
and then proceed north along the
county boundary line approximately 0.1
mile to the county boundary’s
intersection with Long Valley Road;
then
(36) Proceed east-southeasterly on
Long Valley Road approximately 1.7
miles to the road’s intersection with the
Los Angeles city boundary
(approximately 0.1 mile north of U.S.
Highway 101 (Ventura Freeway)),
section 23, T1N/R17W; then
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
(37) Proceed south along the Los
Angeles city boundary approximately
0.2 mile, then east-northeasterly
approximately 0.2 mile, and then
southeasterly approximately 0.9 mile to
the city boundary’s intersection with the
northern boundary of section 26, T1N/
R17W; then
(38) Proceed east-northeasterly along
the Los Angeles city boundary
approximately 0.3 mile, and then
continue easterly along the city
boundary approximately 0.5 mile,
crossing onto the Canoga Park map, and
returning to the beginning point.
Signed: June 24, 2013.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–15876 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2011–0322]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Special
Buzzards Bay Vessel Regulation,
Buzzards Bay, MA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is seeking
comments and feedback on how best to
enhance environmental protections and
navigation safety outlined in the Special
Buzzards Bay regulations. Specifically,
the Coast Guard is seeking comments
related to potential modifications of the
current mandatory pilotage, escort tug,
and Vessel Movement Reporting System
(VMRS) Buzzards Bay requirements.
The Coast Guard intends to use this
input to propose new requirements on
barges carrying 5,000 or more barrels of
oil or other hazardous material.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before October 7, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of Docket Number
USCG–2011–0322. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Open Docket
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40651
Folder’’ on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may submit comments, identified
by docket number, using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329. See the ‘‘Public Participation
and Request for Comments’’ portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. John J. Mauro, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
First District, (617) 223–8355, email
John.J.Mauro@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
AIS Automatic Identification System
ANPRM Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
AWO American Waterways Operators
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MOSPA Massachusetts Oil Spill Prevention
and Response Act
RCP Responsible Carrier Program
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
RA Technical Risk Assessment
VMRS Vessel Movement Reporting System
A. Executive Summary
Having weighed sometimes
competing, but fundamentally
important goals of environmental
protection, concerns of the local
community, judicious use of public
funds, restrained exercise of
governmental regulation, facilitation of
maritime commerce, and the
standardization of safety regulations to
avoid the fragmentation of regulatory
regimes as a vessel transits across State
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40652
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
or regional boundaries, we now seek to
develop the next phase of
comprehensive, balanced, and effective
risk mitigation measures for Buzzards
Bay. In particular, we want to update
the following areas:
• Federal Pilotage. The Coast Guard
believes laden tank barges transiting
Buzzards Bay and carrying 5,000 or
more barrels of oil or other hazardous
material should be under the direction
and control of an independent pilot
regardless of whether those tank barges
are single or double hull.
• Reporting and participation
requirements of the VMRS Buzzards
Bay. The Coast Guard believes
amending the reporting and
participation requirements of the VMRS
Buzzards Bay to focus on that
population of marine traffic that is laden
with 5,000 or more barrels of oil or
hazardous material, rather than all
marine traffic, will enhance navigation
safety and marine environmental
protection. The intent is that the VMRS
will still be manned on a 24 × 7 basis.
• Escort Tugs. The Coast Guard
believes that under certain conditions
(e.g. adverse weather, equipment
limitations), double hull tank barges
laden with 5,000 or more barrels of oil
or hazardous material may require a tug
escort. Single-hull tank barges will
continue to require tug escorts under all
circumstances. The Coast Guard notes
that single hull tank barges are to be
phased out January 1, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit
a Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box
and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated
with this rulemaking. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before July 29, 2013, using
one of the methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Regulatory History and Information
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA
90) resulted in sweeping changes to the
way oil and chemical transportation is
conducted in the United States and
throughout the world. This wideranging legislation required changes in
virtually every aspect of the oil
transportation industry. It involved new
construction requirements, operational
changes, response planning, licensing
and manning mandates, and increased
liability limits.
One significant pollution prevention
standard in OPA 90 was the
requirement that new tank barges and
vessels be of double- hull construction.
This provision also required that
existing single-hull tank vessels
(including barges) be retrofitted with a
double hull or be phased out of
operation entirely by January 1, 2015.
In 1998, in response to the January
1996 grounding of a single-hull tank
barge off Moonstone Beach in Rhode
Island that resulted in the release of
approximately 880,000 gallons of #2
fuel oil, the Coast Guard established an
RNA for the navigable waters of the
First Coast Guard District. The RNA
required any single-hull tank barge
carrying petroleum as bulk cargo to be
accompanied by an escort or assist tug
unless towed by a tug equipped with
twin-screws and two engines
independent of each other and capable
of maintaining control of the tank barge
in the event of a loss of one of the
engines. It also stipulated that the escort
or assist tug must be of sufficient
capability to push or tow the tank barge
promptly away from danger, and noted
that the use of double-hull barges would
remove the need for twin-screw, twinengine tugs.
In response to the April 2003
grounding of the oil-laden barge B–120,
which spilled approximately 98,000
gallons of No. 6 oil into Buzzards Bay,
the Coast Guard undertook several
studies and assessments, facilitated
public discussion and ultimately
implemented additional measures to
improve navigation safety and protect
the marine environment. Those
measures included aids-to-navigation
improvements and adoption of a
voluntary recommended vessel route
(‘‘green lanes’’) in 2004, followed in
2007 by an updated RNA that contained
requirements for escort tugs, federally
licensed pilots, and creation of a VMRS;
these enhancements were accompanied
by widely expanded use of AIS. These
changes were intended to reduce the
navigation and environmental risks
associated with tank barges laden with
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
5,000 or more barrels of petroleum
product or other hazardous material.
Since 2007, the American Waterways
Operators (AWO) Responsible Carrier
Program (RCP) and the emerging Coast
Guard Towing Vessel Inspection
Program have also served to reduce the
likelihood of a material or human factorrelated incident through vessel design
and equipment standards, maintenance
programs, staffing and certification
programs, and compliance programs.
For more information about the Coast
Guard Towing Vessel Inspection
Program, see the notice of proposed
rulemaking published at 76 FR 49976.
For more information about the AWO
RCP, please see their Web site: https://
www.americanwaterways.com/
commitment_safety/.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has the authority
to establish RNAs in defined water areas
that are hazardous or in which
hazardous conditions are determined to
exist. See 33 U.S.C. 1231 and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
In 2012, the Coast Guard and
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection (Mass DEP)
contracted with the Homeland Security
Systems Engineering Development
Institute (HS–SEDI) to provide a
technical risk assessment (RA) and
evaluation of measures to further reduce
the level of potential risk of an oil spill
in Buzzards Bay and the Cape Cod
Canal (The RA will be provided in the
docket).
The RA noted that double-hull tank
barge requirements, which become fully
effective in January 2015, have
increasingly resulted in a significant
reduction in the probability of an oil
spill after a marine incident that
culminated in a collision, allision, or
grounding. The double hull requirement
is noted as one of the primary
contributors to risk reduction in
Buzzards Bay.
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to provide for safety on
the navigable waters in the regulated
area.
E. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard plans to use the
results of this RA to evaluate the current
level of federal regulation for Buzzards
Bay and the Cape Cod Canal, and to
determine whether changes are
necessary to the VMRS, federal pilots,
and/or tug escort system requirements
in order to enhance safety in the marine
environment and further reduce the
potential for oil spills.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
VMRS: We believe that the current
regulations regarding the VMRS need
revision, in that the majority of vessels
currently monitored do not pose
significant threats of pollution
incidents. As currently written, the
regulations direct watch stander focus
from the higher risk population of oil
and hazardous cargo laden tank barges
to the much broader population of
nearly ALL vessels transiting in
Buzzards Bay. In addition, in a
comparative ranking of measures that
would mitigate risk of an oil spill, the
RA ranked the VMRS as one of the less
effective options for preventing spills in
Buzzards Bay. Therefore, we believe
that the public would be best served if
the VMRS were to focus specifically on
the highest risk vessels that transit
Buzzards Bay, (oil laden tank barges
carrying 5,000 or more barrels of
petroleum or other hazardous cargo)
rather than ALL vessels.
Certain classes of vessels that frequent
Buzzards Bay and are currently subject
to the VMRS regulations, such as
commercial fishing vessels and ferries,
usually have a maximum capacity of
250 barrels of petroleum (primarily for
fuel). This is well below the 5,000-barrel
threshold considered to be a significant
threat to the environment as defined in
the 2007 regulations that implemented
several navigation safety measures in
Buzzards Bay and established the
VMRS. (See 72 FR 50052.)
More than 20,000 commercial cargo
vessels, tankers, tugs, barges, passenger
vessels, and commercial fishing vessels
pass through Buzzards Bay each year,
along with thousands of smaller
recreational boats. Of those, roughly 600
are tank barges laden with 5,000 or more
barrels of petroleum or other hazardous
material. When viewed in combination
with the increased measures already
implemented along with those that we
propose to put in place (including
mandatory pilotage and condition-based
tug escorts), the need for this additional
control for tank barges laden with LESS
than 5,000 barrels of petroleum or other
hazardous material is no longer
necessary and counter-productive as it
diffuses watch stander attention from
the higher risk target population.
Changing certain reporting and
participation requirements of the
Buzzards Bay VMRS to more closely
focus monitoring activity on tank barges
laden with 5,000 or more barrels of
petroleum or other hazardous material
would reduce reporting and
participation on certain other classes of
vessels, and permit marine controllers
to focus more closely on the intended
vessel population—tank barges laden
with 5,000 or more barrels of petroleum
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40653
product or other hazardous material—
thereby reducing costs and improving
navigation safety in Buzzards Bay.
What changes to the VMRS Buzzards
Bay reporting and participation
requirements are being considered by
the Coast Guard?
Only tank barges laden with 5,000 or
more barrels of petroleum or other
hazardous material (both single hull and
double hull) would be required to
submit intentions and position reports,
and would be actively monitored as
they transited through Buzzards Bay by
the VMRS control center at the Cape
Cod Canal. All other classes of vessels
(such as ferries and commercial fishing
vessels) that currently participate in the
VMRS in either an ‘‘active’’ or ‘‘passive’’
capacity (per the VMRS User Manual)
would be exempt from VMRS
requirements and would not be actively
monitored by the VMRS control center.
What would not change from the
current VMRS Buzzards Bay reporting
and participation requirements?
1. All vessels subject to the Bridge-ToBridge Radiotelephone Act (i.e.,
primarily commercial vessels, including
ferries and commercial fishing vessels,
but not including recreational vessels)
would still be required to monitor the
VMRS radio frequency (channel 13
VHF–FM) at all times while operating
within the VMRS area and respond
promptly when hailed. (See Pub. L. 92–
63; 85 Stat. 164; 33 U.S.C. 1201–1208;
33 CFR 26; 47 CFR 80.1001–80.1023; 46
CFR 7).
2. All vessels (including recreational
vessels) would still be required to
observe the Inland Rules of the Road
(See Pub. L. 96–591; 94 Stat. 3415; 33
U.S.C. 2001–2038; 33 CFR 84–90).
3. All current reporting and
participation requirements for tank
barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels
of petroleum or other hazardous
material will continue to be in effect.
4. VMRS Buzzards Bay Control will
continue to be staffed and operated by
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cape Cod
Canal.
Federal Pilots: The existing regulation
states that each single hull tank barge
transiting Buzzards Bay carrying 5,000
or more barrels of oil or other hazardous
material must be under the direction
and control of a pilot, who is not a
member of the crew, operating under a
valid, appropriately endorsed, Federal
first class pilots license issued by the
Coast Guard. Pilots are required to
embark, direct, and control from the
primary tug during transits of Buzzards
Bay. The new regulation would extend
this requirement to double hulls as well
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
40654
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Proposed Rules
so that all oil or hazardous materialladen tank barges carrying 5,000 or more
barrels of petroleum or other hazardous
material would require pilots under all
circumstances. The RA acknowledges
that the independent pilotage
requirement proposed provides
additional decision support and
experience on the tug when transiting
Buzzards Bay, and significantly reduces
the probability of a human factorinduced incident.
Escort Tugs: The Coast Guard is
considering establishing certain
thresholds, the exceedance of which
would trigger the requirement for an
escort tug for double-hull tank barges
laden with 5,000 or more barrels of oil
or hazardous material. These thresholds
could be expressed in terms of
meteorological conditions such as wind
speed, wave height or visibility, or any
other factors deemed appropriate, such
as equipment limitations or defects.
Specifically, the Coast Guard seeks the
input of operators, pilots, industry
associations, regulators, members of the
Area Committee, and concerned citizens
on the potential threshold conditions
which would trigger the requirement of
an escort tug for double-hull tank barges
laden with 5,000 or more barrels of oil
or hazardous material.
Once these threshold conditions are
fixed, industry would have the
flexibility to determine if the need to
transit during these high-risk periods is
offset by the additional cost of the
escort, or if a delay in transit awaiting
more favorable conditions is a better
option.
In a comparative ranking of measures
that would mitigate risk of an oil spill,
the RA quotes a National Academy of
Science study indicating that double
hulls result in a 75 to 83 percent
reduction in the probability of a spill,
should a grounding, collision or allision
occur. Therefore, escort tugs would
continue to accompany all single-hulled
tank barges laden with 5,000 or more
barrels of petroleum or other hazardous
material through Buzzards Bay until
single-hulled tank barges are phased out
January 1, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
F. Information Requested
This advance notice of proposed
rulemaking invites public comment on
the merits, advantages, and
disadvantages of changing certain vessel
reporting and participation
requirements of the Buzzards Bay
VMRS; Federal Pilots, not a member of
the crew, on board tugs towing both
single- and double-hulled tank barges;
and Escort Tugs for double-hull tank
barges during adverse conditions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:08 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
G. Preliminary Regulatory Analysis
This document is issued under
authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 33 CFR
1.05–30.
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. The U.S.
Supreme Court, in the cases of United
States v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000) and
Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S.
151 (1978) has ruled that certain
categories of regulation issued pursuant
to the Ports and Waterways Safety Act
of 1972, as amended, are reserved
exclusively to the Coast Guard, and that
State regulation in these areas is
preempted. In general, only the federal
government may regulate the design,
construction, alteration, repair,
maintenance, operation, equipping,
personnel qualification, and manning of
tank vessels. Similarly, where the Coast
Guard enacts regulations that control
vessel traffic or are otherwise intended
to protect navigation and the marine
environment, or affirmatively
determines that such regulation is
unnecessary or inappropriate, a State
may not enact rules that conflict with
the Coast Guard’s determination in that
area, including situations in which the
State rules are identical to the federal
rules.
As noted previously in our 2007
rulemaking (See 72 FR 50052), the Coast
Guard believes that State law is
preempted on the subjects discussed in
this ANPRM, specifically with regard to
the subjects of vessel routing, manning,
and tug escort requirements in Buzzards
Bay.
Nevertheless, the Coast Guard
recognizes the key role State and local
governments may have in making
regulatory determinations. Sections 4
and 6 of Executive Order 13132 require
that for any rules with preemptive
effect, the Coast Guard shall provide
elected officials of affected State and
local governments and their
representative national organizations
the notice and opportunity for
appropriate participation in any
rulemaking proceedings, and to consult
with such officials early in the
rulemaking process.
Therefore, we invite affected State
and local governments and their
representative national organizations to
indicate their desire for participation
and consultation in this rulemaking
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
process by submitting comments to this
notice. In accordance with Executive
Order 13132, the Coast Guard will
provide a federalism impact statement
to document (1) the extent of the Coast
Guard’s consultation with State and
local officials that submit comments to
this advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking, (2) a summary of the nature
of any concerns raised by State or local
governments and the Coast Guard’s
position thereon, and (3) the extent to
which the concerns of State and local
officials have been met. We will also
report to the Office of Management and
Budget any written communications
with the States.
Dated: May 30, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013–16252 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0026, FRL–9830–9]
Approval, Disapproval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans;
State of Wyoming; Regional Haze State
Implementation Plan; Federal
Implementation Plan for Regional
Haze; Notice of Public Hearings
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of public hearings;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
EPA has scheduled additional
public hearings for our proposed action
on Wyoming’s State Implementation
Plan (SIP) addressing regional haze
under. We are making this change in
response to letters submitted by the
Governor of Wyoming on June 13, 2013,
the Wyoming Congressional Delegation
on June 14, 2013, and the Wyoming
Department of Environmental Quality
on June 14, 2013. The comment period
for this action was scheduled to close on
August 9, 2013. EPA is extending the
comment period to August 26, 2013 to
allow for a full 30 days for the
submission of additional comments
following the public hearings.
DATES: Public hearings for this proposal
are scheduled to be held on July 17,
2013 at the Laramie County Library,
Cottonwood Room, 2200 Pioneer
Avenue, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001
and on July 26, 2013 at the Oil & Gas
Conservation Commission, Meeting
Room 129, 2211 King Boulevard,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40651-40654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16252]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2011-0322]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Special Buzzards Bay Vessel
Regulation, Buzzards Bay, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is seeking comments and feedback on how best
to enhance environmental protections and navigation safety outlined in
the Special Buzzards Bay regulations. Specifically, the Coast Guard is
seeking comments related to potential modifications of the current
mandatory pilotage, escort tug, and Vessel Movement Reporting System
(VMRS) Buzzards Bay requirements. The Coast Guard intends to use this
input to propose new requirements on barges carrying 5,000 or more
barrels of oil or other hazardous material.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before October 7, 2013.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of Docket
Number USCG-2011-0322. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as
being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type
the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on
``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may submit comments, identified by docket number, using any one
of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: (202) 493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329. See the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. John J. Mauro, Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard First District, (617) 223-8355, email
John.J.Mauro@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
AIS Automatic Identification System
ANPRM Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
AWO American Waterways Operators
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MOSPA Massachusetts Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act
RCP Responsible Carrier Program
RNA Regulated Navigation Area
RA Technical Risk Assessment
VMRS Vessel Movement Reporting System
A. Executive Summary
Having weighed sometimes competing, but fundamentally important
goals of environmental protection, concerns of the local community,
judicious use of public funds, restrained exercise of governmental
regulation, facilitation of maritime commerce, and the standardization
of safety regulations to avoid the fragmentation of regulatory regimes
as a vessel transits across State
[[Page 40652]]
or regional boundaries, we now seek to develop the next phase of
comprehensive, balanced, and effective risk mitigation measures for
Buzzards Bay. In particular, we want to update the following areas:
Federal Pilotage. The Coast Guard believes laden tank
barges transiting Buzzards Bay and carrying 5,000 or more barrels of
oil or other hazardous material should be under the direction and
control of an independent pilot regardless of whether those tank barges
are single or double hull.
Reporting and participation requirements of the VMRS
Buzzards Bay. The Coast Guard believes amending the reporting and
participation requirements of the VMRS Buzzards Bay to focus on that
population of marine traffic that is laden with 5,000 or more barrels
of oil or hazardous material, rather than all marine traffic, will
enhance navigation safety and marine environmental protection. The
intent is that the VMRS will still be manned on a 24 x 7 basis.
Escort Tugs. The Coast Guard believes that under certain
conditions (e.g. adverse weather, equipment limitations), double hull
tank barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels of oil or hazardous
material may require a tug escort. Single-hull tank barges will
continue to require tug escorts under all circumstances. The Coast
Guard notes that single hull tank barges are to be phased out January
1, 2015.
B. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room
W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before July 29, 2013, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.
C. Regulatory History and Information
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) resulted in sweeping changes
to the way oil and chemical transportation is conducted in the United
States and throughout the world. This wide-ranging legislation required
changes in virtually every aspect of the oil transportation industry.
It involved new construction requirements, operational changes,
response planning, licensing and manning mandates, and increased
liability limits.
One significant pollution prevention standard in OPA 90 was the
requirement that new tank barges and vessels be of double- hull
construction. This provision also required that existing single-hull
tank vessels (including barges) be retrofitted with a double hull or be
phased out of operation entirely by January 1, 2015.
In 1998, in response to the January 1996 grounding of a single-hull
tank barge off Moonstone Beach in Rhode Island that resulted in the
release of approximately 880,000 gallons of 2 fuel oil, the
Coast Guard established an RNA for the navigable waters of the First
Coast Guard District. The RNA required any single-hull tank barge
carrying petroleum as bulk cargo to be accompanied by an escort or
assist tug unless towed by a tug equipped with twin-screws and two
engines independent of each other and capable of maintaining control of
the tank barge in the event of a loss of one of the engines. It also
stipulated that the escort or assist tug must be of sufficient
capability to push or tow the tank barge promptly away from danger, and
noted that the use of double-hull barges would remove the need for
twin-screw, twin-engine tugs.
In response to the April 2003 grounding of the oil-laden barge B-
120, which spilled approximately 98,000 gallons of No. 6 oil into
Buzzards Bay, the Coast Guard undertook several studies and
assessments, facilitated public discussion and ultimately implemented
additional measures to improve navigation safety and protect the marine
environment. Those measures included aids-to-navigation improvements
and adoption of a voluntary recommended vessel route (``green lanes'')
in 2004, followed in 2007 by an updated RNA that contained requirements
for escort tugs, federally licensed pilots, and creation of a VMRS;
these enhancements were accompanied by widely expanded use of AIS.
These changes were intended to reduce the navigation and environmental
risks associated with tank barges laden with
[[Page 40653]]
5,000 or more barrels of petroleum product or other hazardous material.
Since 2007, the American Waterways Operators (AWO) Responsible
Carrier Program (RCP) and the emerging Coast Guard Towing Vessel
Inspection Program have also served to reduce the likelihood of a
material or human factor-related incident through vessel design and
equipment standards, maintenance programs, staffing and certification
programs, and compliance programs. For more information about the Coast
Guard Towing Vessel Inspection Program, see the notice of proposed
rulemaking published at 76 FR 49976. For more information about the AWO
RCP, please see their Web site: https://www.americanwaterways.com/commitment_safety/.
D. Basis and Purpose
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety Act, the Coast Guard has the
authority to establish RNAs in defined water areas that are hazardous
or in which hazardous conditions are determined to exist. See 33 U.S.C.
1231 and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
In 2012, the Coast Guard and Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection (Mass DEP) contracted with the Homeland
Security Systems Engineering Development Institute (HS-SEDI) to provide
a technical risk assessment (RA) and evaluation of measures to further
reduce the level of potential risk of an oil spill in Buzzards Bay and
the Cape Cod Canal (The RA will be provided in the docket).
The RA noted that double-hull tank barge requirements, which become
fully effective in January 2015, have increasingly resulted in a
significant reduction in the probability of an oil spill after a marine
incident that culminated in a collision, allision, or grounding. The
double hull requirement is noted as one of the primary contributors to
risk reduction in Buzzards Bay.
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to provide for safety on
the navigable waters in the regulated area.
E. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard plans to use the results of this RA to evaluate the
current level of federal regulation for Buzzards Bay and the Cape Cod
Canal, and to determine whether changes are necessary to the VMRS,
federal pilots, and/or tug escort system requirements in order to
enhance safety in the marine environment and further reduce the
potential for oil spills.
VMRS: We believe that the current regulations regarding the VMRS
need revision, in that the majority of vessels currently monitored do
not pose significant threats of pollution incidents. As currently
written, the regulations direct watch stander focus from the higher
risk population of oil and hazardous cargo laden tank barges to the
much broader population of nearly ALL vessels transiting in Buzzards
Bay. In addition, in a comparative ranking of measures that would
mitigate risk of an oil spill, the RA ranked the VMRS as one of the
less effective options for preventing spills in Buzzards Bay.
Therefore, we believe that the public would be best served if the VMRS
were to focus specifically on the highest risk vessels that transit
Buzzards Bay, (oil laden tank barges carrying 5,000 or more barrels of
petroleum or other hazardous cargo) rather than ALL vessels.
Certain classes of vessels that frequent Buzzards Bay and are
currently subject to the VMRS regulations, such as commercial fishing
vessels and ferries, usually have a maximum capacity of 250 barrels of
petroleum (primarily for fuel). This is well below the 5,000-barrel
threshold considered to be a significant threat to the environment as
defined in the 2007 regulations that implemented several navigation
safety measures in Buzzards Bay and established the VMRS. (See 72 FR
50052.)
More than 20,000 commercial cargo vessels, tankers, tugs, barges,
passenger vessels, and commercial fishing vessels pass through Buzzards
Bay each year, along with thousands of smaller recreational boats. Of
those, roughly 600 are tank barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels of
petroleum or other hazardous material. When viewed in combination with
the increased measures already implemented along with those that we
propose to put in place (including mandatory pilotage and condition-
based tug escorts), the need for this additional control for tank
barges laden with LESS than 5,000 barrels of petroleum or other
hazardous material is no longer necessary and counter-productive as it
diffuses watch stander attention from the higher risk target
population.
Changing certain reporting and participation requirements of the
Buzzards Bay VMRS to more closely focus monitoring activity on tank
barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels of petroleum or other hazardous
material would reduce reporting and participation on certain other
classes of vessels, and permit marine controllers to focus more closely
on the intended vessel population--tank barges laden with 5,000 or more
barrels of petroleum product or other hazardous material--thereby
reducing costs and improving navigation safety in Buzzards Bay.
What changes to the VMRS Buzzards Bay reporting and participation
requirements are being considered by the Coast Guard?
Only tank barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels of petroleum or
other hazardous material (both single hull and double hull) would be
required to submit intentions and position reports, and would be
actively monitored as they transited through Buzzards Bay by the VMRS
control center at the Cape Cod Canal. All other classes of vessels
(such as ferries and commercial fishing vessels) that currently
participate in the VMRS in either an ``active'' or ``passive'' capacity
(per the VMRS User Manual) would be exempt from VMRS requirements and
would not be actively monitored by the VMRS control center.
What would not change from the current VMRS Buzzards Bay reporting and
participation requirements?
1. All vessels subject to the Bridge-To-Bridge Radiotelephone Act
(i.e., primarily commercial vessels, including ferries and commercial
fishing vessels, but not including recreational vessels) would still be
required to monitor the VMRS radio frequency (channel 13 VHF-FM) at all
times while operating within the VMRS area and respond promptly when
hailed. (See Pub. L. 92-63; 85 Stat. 164; 33 U.S.C. 1201-1208; 33 CFR
26; 47 CFR 80.1001-80.1023; 46 CFR 7).
2. All vessels (including recreational vessels) would still be
required to observe the Inland Rules of the Road (See Pub. L. 96-591;
94 Stat. 3415; 33 U.S.C. 2001-2038; 33 CFR 84-90).
3. All current reporting and participation requirements for tank
barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels of petroleum or other hazardous
material will continue to be in effect.
4. VMRS Buzzards Bay Control will continue to be staffed and
operated by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cape Cod Canal.
Federal Pilots: The existing regulation states that each single
hull tank barge transiting Buzzards Bay carrying 5,000 or more barrels
of oil or other hazardous material must be under the direction and
control of a pilot, who is not a member of the crew, operating under a
valid, appropriately endorsed, Federal first class pilots license
issued by the Coast Guard. Pilots are required to embark, direct, and
control from the primary tug during transits of Buzzards Bay. The new
regulation would extend this requirement to double hulls as well
[[Page 40654]]
so that all oil or hazardous material-laden tank barges carrying 5,000
or more barrels of petroleum or other hazardous material would require
pilots under all circumstances. The RA acknowledges that the
independent pilotage requirement proposed provides additional decision
support and experience on the tug when transiting Buzzards Bay, and
significantly reduces the probability of a human factor-induced
incident.
Escort Tugs: The Coast Guard is considering establishing certain
thresholds, the exceedance of which would trigger the requirement for
an escort tug for double-hull tank barges laden with 5,000 or more
barrels of oil or hazardous material. These thresholds could be
expressed in terms of meteorological conditions such as wind speed,
wave height or visibility, or any other factors deemed appropriate,
such as equipment limitations or defects. Specifically, the Coast Guard
seeks the input of operators, pilots, industry associations,
regulators, members of the Area Committee, and concerned citizens on
the potential threshold conditions which would trigger the requirement
of an escort tug for double-hull tank barges laden with 5,000 or more
barrels of oil or hazardous material.
Once these threshold conditions are fixed, industry would have the
flexibility to determine if the need to transit during these high-risk
periods is offset by the additional cost of the escort, or if a delay
in transit awaiting more favorable conditions is a better option.
In a comparative ranking of measures that would mitigate risk of an
oil spill, the RA quotes a National Academy of Science study indicating
that double hulls result in a 75 to 83 percent reduction in the
probability of a spill, should a grounding, collision or allision
occur. Therefore, escort tugs would continue to accompany all single-
hulled tank barges laden with 5,000 or more barrels of petroleum or
other hazardous material through Buzzards Bay until single-hulled tank
barges are phased out January 1, 2015.
F. Information Requested
This advance notice of proposed rulemaking invites public comment
on the merits, advantages, and disadvantages of changing certain vessel
reporting and participation requirements of the Buzzards Bay VMRS;
Federal Pilots, not a member of the crew, on board tugs towing both
single- and double-hulled tank barges; and Escort Tugs for double-hull
tank barges during adverse conditions.
G. Preliminary Regulatory Analysis
This document is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 33
CFR 1.05-30.
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. The U.S. Supreme Court, in the cases of United States v.
Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (2000) and Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S.
151 (1978) has ruled that certain categories of regulation issued
pursuant to the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972, as amended, are
reserved exclusively to the Coast Guard, and that State regulation in
these areas is preempted. In general, only the federal government may
regulate the design, construction, alteration, repair, maintenance,
operation, equipping, personnel qualification, and manning of tank
vessels. Similarly, where the Coast Guard enacts regulations that
control vessel traffic or are otherwise intended to protect navigation
and the marine environment, or affirmatively determines that such
regulation is unnecessary or inappropriate, a State may not enact rules
that conflict with the Coast Guard's determination in that area,
including situations in which the State rules are identical to the
federal rules.
As noted previously in our 2007 rulemaking (See 72 FR 50052), the
Coast Guard believes that State law is preempted on the subjects
discussed in this ANPRM, specifically with regard to the subjects of
vessel routing, manning, and tug escort requirements in Buzzards Bay.
Nevertheless, the Coast Guard recognizes the key role State and
local governments may have in making regulatory determinations.
Sections 4 and 6 of Executive Order 13132 require that for any rules
with preemptive effect, the Coast Guard shall provide elected officials
of affected State and local governments and their representative
national organizations the notice and opportunity for appropriate
participation in any rulemaking proceedings, and to consult with such
officials early in the rulemaking process.
Therefore, we invite affected State and local governments and their
representative national organizations to indicate their desire for
participation and consultation in this rulemaking process by submitting
comments to this notice. In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the
Coast Guard will provide a federalism impact statement to document (1)
the extent of the Coast Guard's consultation with State and local
officials that submit comments to this advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking, (2) a summary of the nature of any concerns raised by State
or local governments and the Coast Guard's position thereon, and (3)
the extent to which the concerns of State and local officials have been
met. We will also report to the Office of Management and Budget any
written communications with the States.
Dated: May 30, 2013.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-16252 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P