Reporting Ultimate Payees of Political Committee Disbursements, 40625-40627 [2013-16125]
Download as PDF
40625
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 78, No. 130
Monday, July 8, 2013
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Parts 210 and 220
[FNS–2007–0038]
RIN 0584–AD59
Nutrition Standards in the National
School Lunch and School Breakfast
Programs; Approval of Information
Collection Request
AGENCY:
increase the availability of fruits,
vegetables, whole grains, and fat-free
and low-fat fluid milk in school meals;
reduce the levels of sodium, saturated
fat and trans fat in meals; and meet the
nutrition needs of school children
within their calorie requirements. These
improvements to the school meal
programs, largely based on
recommendations made by the Institute
of Medicine of the National Academies,
are expected to enhance the diet and
health of school children, and help
mitigate the childhood obesity trend.
The proposed rule took comments on
the associated ICR until March 14, 2011.
Compliance with provisions of this rule
is effective from July 1, 2012. This
document announces OMB’s approval
of the ICR under OMB Control Number
0584–0006.
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–16278 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
information collection request.
BILLING CODE P
The Food and Nutrition
Service published a final rule entitled
‘‘Nutrition Standards in the National
School Lunch and School Breakfast
Programs’’ on January 26, 2012. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) cleared the associated
information collection requirements
(ICR) on February 1, 2013. This
document announces approval of the
ICR.
Food and Nutrition Service
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SUMMARY:
The ICR associated with the final
rule published in the Federal Register
on January 26, 2012 at 77 FR 4088 was
approved by OMB on February 1, 2013,
under OMB Control Number 0584–0006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Jon Garcia,
Program Analysis and Monitoring
Branch, Child Nutrition Division, 3101
Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA
22302.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
The
January 2012 final rule updates the meal
patterns and nutrition standards for the
National School Lunch and School
Breakfast Programs to align them with
the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
This rule requires most schools to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
7 CFR Parts 245 and 272
RIN 0584–AE10
National School Lunch Program: Direct
Certification Continuous Improvement
Plans Required by the Healthy,
Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010;
Approval of Information Collection
Request
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
information collection request
AGENCY:
The Food and Nutrition
Service published a final rule entitled
‘‘National School Lunch Program: Direct
Certification Continuous Improvement
Plans Required by the Healthy, HungerFree Kids Act of 2010’’ on February 22,
2013. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) cleared the associated
information collection requirements
(ICR) on April 10, 2013. This document
announces approval of the ICR.
DATES: The ICR associated with the final
rule published in the Federal Register
on February 22, 2013 at 78 FR 12221
was approved by OMB on April 10,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2013, under OMB Control Number
0584–0577.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Jon Garcia,
Program Analysis and Monitoring
Branch, Child Nutrition Division, 3101
Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA
22302.
The
February 22, 2013 final rule amended
the National School Lunch Program
(NSLP) regulations to incorporate
provisions of the Healthy, Hunger-Free
Kids Act of 2010 designed to encourage
States to improve direct certification
efforts with the Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP). The
provisions require State agencies to
meet certain direct certification
performance benchmarks and to
develop and implement continuous
improvement plans if they fail to do so.
The final rule also amended NSLP and
SNAP regulations to provide for the
collection of data elements needed to
compute each State’s direct certification
performance rate to compare with the
new benchmarks. Improved direct
certification efforts will help increase
program accuracy, reduce paperwork for
States and households, and increase
eligible children’s access to school
meals. The proposed rule took
comments on the associated ICR until
April 2, 2012. This document
announces OMB’s approval of the ICR
under OMB Control Number 0584–0577.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–16189 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
11 CFR Part 104
[Notice 2013–09]
Reporting Ultimate Payees of Political
Committee Disbursements
Federal Election Commission.
Notice of interpretive rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Election
Commission is clarifying its
interpretation of the regulatory
requirement that political committees
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
40626
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
report the full name and address of each
person to whom they make
expenditures or other disbursements
aggregating more than $200 per calendar
year, or per election cycle for authorized
committees, and the date, amount, and
purpose of such payments, in three
situations: A political committee
reimburses an individual who advanced
personal funds to pay committee
expenses aggregating more than $200 to
a single vendor; a political committee
pays a credit card bill that includes a
charge of more than $200 for a single
vendor; and a candidate uses personal
funds to pay his or her authorized
committee’s expenses that aggregate
more than $200 to a single vendor
without receiving reimbursement.
DATES: July 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy L. Rothstein, Assistant General
Counsel, or Joanna S. Waldstreicher,
Attorney, 999 E Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–1650
or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Political
committees must report the name and
address of each person to whom they
make expenditures or other
disbursements aggregating more than
$200 per calendar year, or per election
cycle for authorized committees, as well
as the date, amount, and purpose of
such payments. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(5), (6);
11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii)
(unauthorized committees); 11 CFR
104.3(b)(4)(i), (vi) (authorized
committees); see also 11 CFR 104.9(a),
(b).
The Commission published a draft
Notice on January 31, 2013, to seek
comment on a proposed interpretative
rule to clarify these requirements as
they apply to the reporting of certain
itemized disbursements by political
committees to vendors. The
Commission received four comments:
Two opposed the draft; one supported
the draft with a request that the
Commission impose an additional
reporting requirement; and one
resubmitted the comment supporting
the draft without itself opining on the
draft. Taking those comments into
consideration the Commission now
issues this Notice to clarify its
interpretation of 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i),
(vii); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i), (vi); and 11
CFR 104.9(a), (b). These clarifications
are made to the reporting requirements
contained in these Commission
regulations and implicate no other
regulations than those referenced above.
Specifically, this Notice clarifies how
a political committee should report
disbursements in the following
scenarios:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
(1) The committee reimburses an
individual (such as a campaign staffer)
who used personal funds to pay
committee expenses aggregating more
than $200 to a single vendor;
(2) the committee’s payment of its
credit card bill includes charges of more
than $200 to a single vendor; and
(3) the committee is the authorized
committee of a candidate who used
personal funds to pay committee
expenses aggregating more than $200 to
a single vendor without receiving
reimbursement.
As explained further below, in each
scenario the political committee will
satisfy the reporting requirements by
itemizing as a memo entry on Schedule
B the name and address of the original
vendor, as well as the date, amount, and
purpose of the original purchase made
for or by the political committee. The
Commission makes clear that this
interpretation is based on long-standing
Commission practice and is not making
any fundamental changes to its rules or
processes. Further, the Commission is
only addressing the three issues at hand
and is not extending the clarification to
situations in which a vendor, acting as
the committee’s agent, purchases goods
and services on the committee’s behalf
from subvendors. The relationship
between committees and its vendors
raises different issues than the
relationships that exist in these three
circumstances.
1. Reimbursements to Individuals for
Certain Out-of-Pocket Expenses
When an individual who is not acting
as a vendor advances his or her personal
funds, including a personal credit card,
to pay costs incurred in providing goods
or services to, or obtaining goods or
services that are used by or on behalf of,
a political committee, the political
committee must treat the individual’s
payment as a contribution.1 11 CFR
116.5(a), (b). The political committee
must also treat the obligation arising
from the individual’s payment as an
outstanding debt until reimbursed. 11
CFR 116.5(c); see also 11 CFR 104.11.
If the political committee itemizes its
reimbursement to the individual on
Schedule B of its report filed with the
Commission, then the political
committee may also need to provide
information about the vendor to which
the individual made payment in a
memo entry associated with the
reimbursement. A memo entry is
required for any reimbursement of
1 Certain travel and subsistence expenses that are
not reimbursed, or that are reimbursed within a
limited period of time, are exempt. 11 CFR 116.5(b);
see also 11 CFR 100.79.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
expenses other than travel and
subsistence expenses if the individual’s
payments to the vendor on behalf of the
committee aggregate more than $200 in
a calendar year (or election cycle for
authorized committees). When the
reimbursement is for travel and
subsistence advances that exceed $500,
a memo entry is required for each
payment to a specific vendor by that
individual on behalf of the political
committee if total payments to that
vendor by the political committee or by
that individual on behalf of the
committee aggregate more than $200 in
a calendar year (or election cycle for
authorized committees). Each memo
entry must include the name and
address of the vendor, as well as the
date, amount, and purpose of the
payment. 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i); 11 CFR
104.9.2
For reimbursements of credit card
payments, the memo entry must include
the name and address of the vendor that
provided the goods or services to the
political committee, rather than the
credit card company that processed the
payment, and the date, amount, and
purpose of the payment to the vendor.
Further information about the reporting
of credit card payments appears in
Section 2, below.
2. Payments to Credit Card Companies
Any political committee that itemizes
disbursements to credit card companies
on Schedule B of its report filed with
the Commission must itemize as a
memo entry any transaction with a
single vendor charged on the credit card
that exceeds the $200 itemization
threshold. The memo entry must
include the name and address of the
vendor, and the date, amount, and
purpose of the charge. Itemizing the
ultimate payee, as the provider of goods
or services to the political committee,
accurately reflects the credit card
company’s limited role as a payment
2 This clarification is consistent with the
Commission’s Report Analysis Division Review and
Referral Procedures for the 2011–2012 Election
Cycle, p. 98 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/
RAD_Procedures.pdf), which is approved by the
Commission for every two-year election cycle.
Further, the Commission’s Reports Analysis
Division has been sending Requests for Additional
Information to authorized committees that did not
itemize the ultimate payee for reimbursements to
staff above the applicable thresholds since the
1983–1984 election cycle. Similarly, the Reports
Analysis Division has been sending Requests for
Additional Information to party and non-party
committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee
for reimbursements to staff above the applicable
thresholds since the 2005–2006 election cycle after
internal review procedures for authorized and
unauthorized committees were merged. However, a
grace period for calendar year 2005 was provided
to party and non-party committees to allow for the
development of administrative tracking systems.
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
processor rather than as the provider of
goods and services to the committee.
See 11 CFR 102.9. The itemization
requirement prevents a committee from
avoiding the Act’s disclosure
requirements by placing operating
expenditures on a credit card.3
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Unreimbursed Disbursements by
Candidates
A candidate may make unlimited
expenditures from personal funds on
behalf of his or her authorized
committee. See 11 CFR 110.10. Any
candidate who ‘‘makes a disbursement
in connection with [his or her own]
campaign, shall be considered . . . as
having made the disbursement . . . as
an agent of the authorized committee or
committees of such candidate.’’ 2 U.S.C.
432(e)(2); see also 11 CFR 101.2(a).
Authorized committees must disclose
these disbursements on their reports
filed with the Commission just as they
would disclose any other disbursements
that they may make. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(4),
(5), (6)(A); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4).
Thus, out-of-pocket spending by
candidates, as agents of their authorized
committees, requires memo entry
itemization of the ultimate payee if the
aggregate amount of payments to that
vendor exceeds $200 for the election
cycle. The memo entry must include the
date, amount, and purpose of the out-ofpocket payments, as well as the name
and address of the vendor to which
payment was made.4
This interpretive rule clarifies the
Commission’s interpretation of existing
statutory and regulatory provisions, and
therefore does not constitute an agency
action subject to the notice and
comment requirements or a delayed
effective date under the Administrative
Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 553. The
3 This clarification is consistent with the
Commission’s Report Analysis Division Review and
Referral Procedures for the 2011–2012 Election
Cycle, p. 96 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/
RAD_Procedures.pdf). Similarly with
reimbursements to committee staff, the
Commission’s Reports Analysis Division has been
sending Requests for Additional Information to
authorized committees that did not provide memo
entries for credit card payments above the
applicable thresholds since the 1983–1984 election
cycle.
4 Unlike the former two circumstances, this
scenario is not addressed in the Commission’s
Reports Analysis Division Review and Referral
Procedures for the 2011–2012 Election Cycle that
has been made public with redactions. Although
the Reports Analysis Division will initiate a regular
practice of sending Requests for Additional
Information for failure to itemize the vendor for
candidate out-of-pocket expenditures on behalf of
his or her authorized committee, this portion of the
interpretive rule will be applied prospectively. The
adequacy of the responses to Requests for
Additional Information on this issue will only be
judged for those sent after the adoption of this
interpretive rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Jul 05, 2013
Jkt 229001
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, which apply when notice and
comment are required by the
Administrative Procedure Act or
another statute, do not apply. See 5
U.S.C. 603(a).
Dated: June 27, 2013.
On behalf of the Commission.
Ellen L. Weintraub,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–16125 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Part 12, 163, and 178
[USCBP–2012–0022; CBP Dec. 13–10]
RIN 1515–AD85
Prohibitions and Conditions on the
Importation and Exportation of Rough
Diamonds
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
This document amends the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) regulations to set forth the
prohibitions and conditions that are
applicable to the importation and
exportation of rough diamonds pursuant
to the Clean Diamond Trade Act, as
implemented by the President in
Executive Order 13312 dated July 29,
2003, and the Rough Diamonds Control
Regulations (RDCR) issued by the Office
of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S.
Department of the Treasury. In addition
to restating pertinent provisions of the
RDCR, the amendments clarify that any
U.S. person exporting from, or
importing to, the United States a
shipment of rough diamonds must
retain for a period of at least five years
a copy of the Kimberley Process
Certificate that currently must
accompany such shipments and make
the copy available for inspection when
requested by CBP. The document also
requires formal entry for shipments of
rough diamonds.
DATES: Effective August 7, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Barulich, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade,
(202) 325–0059.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40627
Background
I. Purpose
In response to the role played by the
illicit trade in diamonds in fueling
conflict and human rights violations in
certain areas of the world, and to
differentiate between the trade in
conflict diamonds and the trade in
legitimate diamonds, the United States
and numerous other countries
announced in the Interlaken Declaration
of November 5, 2002, the launch of the
Kimberley Process Certification Scheme
(KPCS) for rough diamonds. Under the
KPCS, participating countries prohibit
the importation of rough diamonds
from, or the exportation of rough
diamonds to, a non-participant and
require that shipments of rough
diamonds from or to a participating
country be controlled through the KPCS.
The U.S. Secretary of State is
responsible for providing an up-to-date
listing of all participants in the KPCS.
Swaziland was added to the list of
participants in the KPCS and the
addition was announced in the Federal
Register (77 FR 27831) on May 11, 2012,
and Cambodia, Cameroon, Kazakhstan,
and Panama were added to the list of
participants and announced in the
Federal Register (78 FR 12135) on
February 21, 2013.
II. Clean Diamond Trade Act and
Executive Order
The Clean Diamond Trade Act (the
Act), Public Law 108–19, 117 Stat. 631
(19 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.), was enacted on
April 25, 2003. Section 4 of the Act
requires the President, subject to certain
waiver authorities, to prohibit the
importation into, or exportation from,
the United States of any rough diamond,
from whatever source, that has not been
controlled through the KPCS. Section
5(a) of the Act authorizes the President
to issue such proclamations,
regulations, licenses, and orders, and
conduct such investigations, as may be
necessary to carry out the Act. Section
5(b) of the Act sets forth the general
recordkeeping requirements that apply
to persons seeking to export from or
import into the United States any rough
diamonds. Section 5(b) specifically
provides that any United States person
seeking to export from or import into
the United States any rough diamonds
shall keep a full record of, in the form
of reports or otherwise, complete
information relating to any act or
transaction to which any prohibition
imposed under section 4(a) of the Act
applies. Section 5(b) further provides
that such person may be required to
furnish such information under oath,
including the production of books of
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40625-40627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16125]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
11 CFR Part 104
[Notice 2013-09]
Reporting Ultimate Payees of Political Committee Disbursements
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Notice of interpretive rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission is clarifying its
interpretation of the regulatory requirement that political committees
[[Page 40626]]
report the full name and address of each person to whom they make
expenditures or other disbursements aggregating more than $200 per
calendar year, or per election cycle for authorized committees, and the
date, amount, and purpose of such payments, in three situations: A
political committee reimburses an individual who advanced personal
funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than $200 to a single
vendor; a political committee pays a credit card bill that includes a
charge of more than $200 for a single vendor; and a candidate uses
personal funds to pay his or her authorized committee's expenses that
aggregate more than $200 to a single vendor without receiving
reimbursement.
DATES: July 8, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy L. Rothstein, Assistant General
Counsel, or Joanna S. Waldstreicher, Attorney, 999 E Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Political committees must report the name
and address of each person to whom they make expenditures or other
disbursements aggregating more than $200 per calendar year, or per
election cycle for authorized committees, as well as the date, amount,
and purpose of such payments. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(5), (6); 11 CFR
104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii) (unauthorized committees); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i),
(vi) (authorized committees); see also 11 CFR 104.9(a), (b).
The Commission published a draft Notice on January 31, 2013, to
seek comment on a proposed interpretative rule to clarify these
requirements as they apply to the reporting of certain itemized
disbursements by political committees to vendors. The Commission
received four comments: Two opposed the draft; one supported the draft
with a request that the Commission impose an additional reporting
requirement; and one resubmitted the comment supporting the draft
without itself opining on the draft. Taking those comments into
consideration the Commission now issues this Notice to clarify its
interpretation of 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i),
(vi); and 11 CFR 104.9(a), (b). These clarifications are made to the
reporting requirements contained in these Commission regulations and
implicate no other regulations than those referenced above.
Specifically, this Notice clarifies how a political committee
should report disbursements in the following scenarios:
(1) The committee reimburses an individual (such as a campaign
staffer) who used personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating
more than $200 to a single vendor;
(2) the committee's payment of its credit card bill includes
charges of more than $200 to a single vendor; and
(3) the committee is the authorized committee of a candidate who
used personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than
$200 to a single vendor without receiving reimbursement.
As explained further below, in each scenario the political
committee will satisfy the reporting requirements by itemizing as a
memo entry on Schedule B the name and address of the original vendor,
as well as the date, amount, and purpose of the original purchase made
for or by the political committee. The Commission makes clear that this
interpretation is based on long-standing Commission practice and is not
making any fundamental changes to its rules or processes. Further, the
Commission is only addressing the three issues at hand and is not
extending the clarification to situations in which a vendor, acting as
the committee's agent, purchases goods and services on the committee's
behalf from subvendors. The relationship between committees and its
vendors raises different issues than the relationships that exist in
these three circumstances.
1. Reimbursements to Individuals for Certain Out-of-Pocket Expenses
When an individual who is not acting as a vendor advances his or
her personal funds, including a personal credit card, to pay costs
incurred in providing goods or services to, or obtaining goods or
services that are used by or on behalf of, a political committee, the
political committee must treat the individual's payment as a
contribution.\1\ 11 CFR 116.5(a), (b). The political committee must
also treat the obligation arising from the individual's payment as an
outstanding debt until reimbursed. 11 CFR 116.5(c); see also 11 CFR
104.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Certain travel and subsistence expenses that are not
reimbursed, or that are reimbursed within a limited period of time,
are exempt. 11 CFR 116.5(b); see also 11 CFR 100.79.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the political committee itemizes its reimbursement to the
individual on Schedule B of its report filed with the Commission, then
the political committee may also need to provide information about the
vendor to which the individual made payment in a memo entry associated
with the reimbursement. A memo entry is required for any reimbursement
of expenses other than travel and subsistence expenses if the
individual's payments to the vendor on behalf of the committee
aggregate more than $200 in a calendar year (or election cycle for
authorized committees). When the reimbursement is for travel and
subsistence advances that exceed $500, a memo entry is required for
each payment to a specific vendor by that individual on behalf of the
political committee if total payments to that vendor by the political
committee or by that individual on behalf of the committee aggregate
more than $200 in a calendar year (or election cycle for authorized
committees). Each memo entry must include the name and address of the
vendor, as well as the date, amount, and purpose of the payment. 11 CFR
104.3(b)(4)(i); 11 CFR 104.9.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This clarification is consistent with the Commission's
Report Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the
2011-2012 Election Cycle, p. 98 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/RAD_Procedures.pdf), which is approved by the Commission for every two-
year election cycle. Further, the Commission's Reports Analysis
Division has been sending Requests for Additional Information to
authorized committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee for
reimbursements to staff above the applicable thresholds since the
1983-1984 election cycle. Similarly, the Reports Analysis Division
has been sending Requests for Additional Information to party and
non-party committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee for
reimbursements to staff above the applicable thresholds since the
2005-2006 election cycle after internal review procedures for
authorized and unauthorized committees were merged. However, a grace
period for calendar year 2005 was provided to party and non-party
committees to allow for the development of administrative tracking
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For reimbursements of credit card payments, the memo entry must
include the name and address of the vendor that provided the goods or
services to the political committee, rather than the credit card
company that processed the payment, and the date, amount, and purpose
of the payment to the vendor. Further information about the reporting
of credit card payments appears in Section 2, below.
2. Payments to Credit Card Companies
Any political committee that itemizes disbursements to credit card
companies on Schedule B of its report filed with the Commission must
itemize as a memo entry any transaction with a single vendor charged on
the credit card that exceeds the $200 itemization threshold. The memo
entry must include the name and address of the vendor, and the date,
amount, and purpose of the charge. Itemizing the ultimate payee, as the
provider of goods or services to the political committee, accurately
reflects the credit card company's limited role as a payment
[[Page 40627]]
processor rather than as the provider of goods and services to the
committee. See 11 CFR 102.9. The itemization requirement prevents a
committee from avoiding the Act's disclosure requirements by placing
operating expenditures on a credit card.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This clarification is consistent with the Commission's
Report Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the
2011-2012 Election Cycle, p. 96 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/RAD_Procedures.pdf). Similarly with reimbursements to committee staff,
the Commission's Reports Analysis Division has been sending Requests
for Additional Information to authorized committees that did not
provide memo entries for credit card payments above the applicable
thresholds since the 1983-1984 election cycle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Unreimbursed Disbursements by Candidates
A candidate may make unlimited expenditures from personal funds on
behalf of his or her authorized committee. See 11 CFR 110.10. Any
candidate who ``makes a disbursement in connection with [his or her
own] campaign, shall be considered . . . as having made the
disbursement . . . as an agent of the authorized committee or
committees of such candidate.'' 2 U.S.C. 432(e)(2); see also 11 CFR
101.2(a). Authorized committees must disclose these disbursements on
their reports filed with the Commission just as they would disclose any
other disbursements that they may make. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(4), (5),
(6)(A); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4).
Thus, out-of-pocket spending by candidates, as agents of their
authorized committees, requires memo entry itemization of the ultimate
payee if the aggregate amount of payments to that vendor exceeds $200
for the election cycle. The memo entry must include the date, amount,
and purpose of the out-of-pocket payments, as well as the name and
address of the vendor to which payment was made.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Unlike the former two circumstances, this scenario is not
addressed in the Commission's Reports Analysis Division Review and
Referral Procedures for the 2011-2012 Election Cycle that has been
made public with redactions. Although the Reports Analysis Division
will initiate a regular practice of sending Requests for Additional
Information for failure to itemize the vendor for candidate out-of-
pocket expenditures on behalf of his or her authorized committee,
this portion of the interpretive rule will be applied prospectively.
The adequacy of the responses to Requests for Additional Information
on this issue will only be judged for those sent after the adoption
of this interpretive rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This interpretive rule clarifies the Commission's interpretation of
existing statutory and regulatory provisions, and therefore does not
constitute an agency action subject to the notice and comment
requirements or a delayed effective date under the Administrative
Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 553. The provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, which apply when notice and comment are required by
the Administrative Procedure Act or another statute, do not apply. See
5 U.S.C. 603(a).
Dated: June 27, 2013.
On behalf of the Commission.
Ellen L. Weintraub,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-16125 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P