Reporting Ultimate Payees of Political Committee Disbursements, 40625-40627 [2013-16125]

Download as PDF 40625 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 78, No. 130 Monday, July 8, 2013 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each week. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service 7 CFR Parts 210 and 220 [FNS–2007–0038] RIN 0584–AD59 Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs; Approval of Information Collection Request AGENCY: increase the availability of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fat-free and low-fat fluid milk in school meals; reduce the levels of sodium, saturated fat and trans fat in meals; and meet the nutrition needs of school children within their calorie requirements. These improvements to the school meal programs, largely based on recommendations made by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, are expected to enhance the diet and health of school children, and help mitigate the childhood obesity trend. The proposed rule took comments on the associated ICR until March 14, 2011. Compliance with provisions of this rule is effective from July 1, 2012. This document announces OMB’s approval of the ICR under OMB Control Number 0584–0006. Dated: June 26, 2013. Audrey Rowe, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. 2013–16278 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am] Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule; approval of information collection request. BILLING CODE P The Food and Nutrition Service published a final rule entitled ‘‘Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs’’ on January 26, 2012. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) cleared the associated information collection requirements (ICR) on February 1, 2013. This document announces approval of the ICR. Food and Nutrition Service DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SUMMARY: The ICR associated with the final rule published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2012 at 77 FR 4088 was approved by OMB on February 1, 2013, under OMB Control Number 0584–0006. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of this information collection should be directed to Jon Garcia, Program Analysis and Monitoring Branch, Child Nutrition Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES DATES: The January 2012 final rule updates the meal patterns and nutrition standards for the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs to align them with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This rule requires most schools to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Jul 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 7 CFR Parts 245 and 272 RIN 0584–AE10 National School Lunch Program: Direct Certification Continuous Improvement Plans Required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010; Approval of Information Collection Request Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. ACTION: Final rule; approval of information collection request AGENCY: The Food and Nutrition Service published a final rule entitled ‘‘National School Lunch Program: Direct Certification Continuous Improvement Plans Required by the Healthy, HungerFree Kids Act of 2010’’ on February 22, 2013. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) cleared the associated information collection requirements (ICR) on April 10, 2013. This document announces approval of the ICR. DATES: The ICR associated with the final rule published in the Federal Register on February 22, 2013 at 78 FR 12221 was approved by OMB on April 10, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 2013, under OMB Control Number 0584–0577. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of this information collection should be directed to Jon Garcia, Program Analysis and Monitoring Branch, Child Nutrition Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302. The February 22, 2013 final rule amended the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) regulations to incorporate provisions of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 designed to encourage States to improve direct certification efforts with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The provisions require State agencies to meet certain direct certification performance benchmarks and to develop and implement continuous improvement plans if they fail to do so. The final rule also amended NSLP and SNAP regulations to provide for the collection of data elements needed to compute each State’s direct certification performance rate to compare with the new benchmarks. Improved direct certification efforts will help increase program accuracy, reduce paperwork for States and households, and increase eligible children’s access to school meals. The proposed rule took comments on the associated ICR until April 2, 2012. This document announces OMB’s approval of the ICR under OMB Control Number 0584–0577. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: June 26, 2013. Audrey Rowe, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. 2013–16189 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 11 CFR Part 104 [Notice 2013–09] Reporting Ultimate Payees of Political Committee Disbursements Federal Election Commission. Notice of interpretive rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Federal Election Commission is clarifying its interpretation of the regulatory requirement that political committees SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM 08JYR1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES 40626 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations report the full name and address of each person to whom they make expenditures or other disbursements aggregating more than $200 per calendar year, or per election cycle for authorized committees, and the date, amount, and purpose of such payments, in three situations: A political committee reimburses an individual who advanced personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than $200 to a single vendor; a political committee pays a credit card bill that includes a charge of more than $200 for a single vendor; and a candidate uses personal funds to pay his or her authorized committee’s expenses that aggregate more than $200 to a single vendor without receiving reimbursement. DATES: July 8, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy L. Rothstein, Assistant General Counsel, or Joanna S. Waldstreicher, Attorney, 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–1650 or (800) 424–9530. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Political committees must report the name and address of each person to whom they make expenditures or other disbursements aggregating more than $200 per calendar year, or per election cycle for authorized committees, as well as the date, amount, and purpose of such payments. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(5), (6); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii) (unauthorized committees); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i), (vi) (authorized committees); see also 11 CFR 104.9(a), (b). The Commission published a draft Notice on January 31, 2013, to seek comment on a proposed interpretative rule to clarify these requirements as they apply to the reporting of certain itemized disbursements by political committees to vendors. The Commission received four comments: Two opposed the draft; one supported the draft with a request that the Commission impose an additional reporting requirement; and one resubmitted the comment supporting the draft without itself opining on the draft. Taking those comments into consideration the Commission now issues this Notice to clarify its interpretation of 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i), (vi); and 11 CFR 104.9(a), (b). These clarifications are made to the reporting requirements contained in these Commission regulations and implicate no other regulations than those referenced above. Specifically, this Notice clarifies how a political committee should report disbursements in the following scenarios: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Jul 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 (1) The committee reimburses an individual (such as a campaign staffer) who used personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than $200 to a single vendor; (2) the committee’s payment of its credit card bill includes charges of more than $200 to a single vendor; and (3) the committee is the authorized committee of a candidate who used personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than $200 to a single vendor without receiving reimbursement. As explained further below, in each scenario the political committee will satisfy the reporting requirements by itemizing as a memo entry on Schedule B the name and address of the original vendor, as well as the date, amount, and purpose of the original purchase made for or by the political committee. The Commission makes clear that this interpretation is based on long-standing Commission practice and is not making any fundamental changes to its rules or processes. Further, the Commission is only addressing the three issues at hand and is not extending the clarification to situations in which a vendor, acting as the committee’s agent, purchases goods and services on the committee’s behalf from subvendors. The relationship between committees and its vendors raises different issues than the relationships that exist in these three circumstances. 1. Reimbursements to Individuals for Certain Out-of-Pocket Expenses When an individual who is not acting as a vendor advances his or her personal funds, including a personal credit card, to pay costs incurred in providing goods or services to, or obtaining goods or services that are used by or on behalf of, a political committee, the political committee must treat the individual’s payment as a contribution.1 11 CFR 116.5(a), (b). The political committee must also treat the obligation arising from the individual’s payment as an outstanding debt until reimbursed. 11 CFR 116.5(c); see also 11 CFR 104.11. If the political committee itemizes its reimbursement to the individual on Schedule B of its report filed with the Commission, then the political committee may also need to provide information about the vendor to which the individual made payment in a memo entry associated with the reimbursement. A memo entry is required for any reimbursement of 1 Certain travel and subsistence expenses that are not reimbursed, or that are reimbursed within a limited period of time, are exempt. 11 CFR 116.5(b); see also 11 CFR 100.79. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 expenses other than travel and subsistence expenses if the individual’s payments to the vendor on behalf of the committee aggregate more than $200 in a calendar year (or election cycle for authorized committees). When the reimbursement is for travel and subsistence advances that exceed $500, a memo entry is required for each payment to a specific vendor by that individual on behalf of the political committee if total payments to that vendor by the political committee or by that individual on behalf of the committee aggregate more than $200 in a calendar year (or election cycle for authorized committees). Each memo entry must include the name and address of the vendor, as well as the date, amount, and purpose of the payment. 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i); 11 CFR 104.9.2 For reimbursements of credit card payments, the memo entry must include the name and address of the vendor that provided the goods or services to the political committee, rather than the credit card company that processed the payment, and the date, amount, and purpose of the payment to the vendor. Further information about the reporting of credit card payments appears in Section 2, below. 2. Payments to Credit Card Companies Any political committee that itemizes disbursements to credit card companies on Schedule B of its report filed with the Commission must itemize as a memo entry any transaction with a single vendor charged on the credit card that exceeds the $200 itemization threshold. The memo entry must include the name and address of the vendor, and the date, amount, and purpose of the charge. Itemizing the ultimate payee, as the provider of goods or services to the political committee, accurately reflects the credit card company’s limited role as a payment 2 This clarification is consistent with the Commission’s Report Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the 2011–2012 Election Cycle, p. 98 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/ RAD_Procedures.pdf), which is approved by the Commission for every two-year election cycle. Further, the Commission’s Reports Analysis Division has been sending Requests for Additional Information to authorized committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee for reimbursements to staff above the applicable thresholds since the 1983–1984 election cycle. Similarly, the Reports Analysis Division has been sending Requests for Additional Information to party and non-party committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee for reimbursements to staff above the applicable thresholds since the 2005–2006 election cycle after internal review procedures for authorized and unauthorized committees were merged. However, a grace period for calendar year 2005 was provided to party and non-party committees to allow for the development of administrative tracking systems. E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM 08JYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 130 / Monday, July 8, 2013 / Rules and Regulations processor rather than as the provider of goods and services to the committee. See 11 CFR 102.9. The itemization requirement prevents a committee from avoiding the Act’s disclosure requirements by placing operating expenditures on a credit card.3 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES 3. Unreimbursed Disbursements by Candidates A candidate may make unlimited expenditures from personal funds on behalf of his or her authorized committee. See 11 CFR 110.10. Any candidate who ‘‘makes a disbursement in connection with [his or her own] campaign, shall be considered . . . as having made the disbursement . . . as an agent of the authorized committee or committees of such candidate.’’ 2 U.S.C. 432(e)(2); see also 11 CFR 101.2(a). Authorized committees must disclose these disbursements on their reports filed with the Commission just as they would disclose any other disbursements that they may make. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(4), (5), (6)(A); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4). Thus, out-of-pocket spending by candidates, as agents of their authorized committees, requires memo entry itemization of the ultimate payee if the aggregate amount of payments to that vendor exceeds $200 for the election cycle. The memo entry must include the date, amount, and purpose of the out-ofpocket payments, as well as the name and address of the vendor to which payment was made.4 This interpretive rule clarifies the Commission’s interpretation of existing statutory and regulatory provisions, and therefore does not constitute an agency action subject to the notice and comment requirements or a delayed effective date under the Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 553. The 3 This clarification is consistent with the Commission’s Report Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the 2011–2012 Election Cycle, p. 96 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/ RAD_Procedures.pdf). Similarly with reimbursements to committee staff, the Commission’s Reports Analysis Division has been sending Requests for Additional Information to authorized committees that did not provide memo entries for credit card payments above the applicable thresholds since the 1983–1984 election cycle. 4 Unlike the former two circumstances, this scenario is not addressed in the Commission’s Reports Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the 2011–2012 Election Cycle that has been made public with redactions. Although the Reports Analysis Division will initiate a regular practice of sending Requests for Additional Information for failure to itemize the vendor for candidate out-of-pocket expenditures on behalf of his or her authorized committee, this portion of the interpretive rule will be applied prospectively. The adequacy of the responses to Requests for Additional Information on this issue will only be judged for those sent after the adoption of this interpretive rule. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Jul 05, 2013 Jkt 229001 provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, which apply when notice and comment are required by the Administrative Procedure Act or another statute, do not apply. See 5 U.S.C. 603(a). Dated: June 27, 2013. On behalf of the Commission. Ellen L. Weintraub, Chair, Federal Election Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–16125 Filed 7–5–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6715–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 19 CFR Part 12, 163, and 178 [USCBP–2012–0022; CBP Dec. 13–10] RIN 1515–AD85 Prohibitions and Conditions on the Importation and Exportation of Rough Diamonds U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security; Department of the Treasury. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCIES: This document amends the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations to set forth the prohibitions and conditions that are applicable to the importation and exportation of rough diamonds pursuant to the Clean Diamond Trade Act, as implemented by the President in Executive Order 13312 dated July 29, 2003, and the Rough Diamonds Control Regulations (RDCR) issued by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. In addition to restating pertinent provisions of the RDCR, the amendments clarify that any U.S. person exporting from, or importing to, the United States a shipment of rough diamonds must retain for a period of at least five years a copy of the Kimberley Process Certificate that currently must accompany such shipments and make the copy available for inspection when requested by CBP. The document also requires formal entry for shipments of rough diamonds. DATES: Effective August 7, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Barulich, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, (202) 325–0059. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 40627 Background I. Purpose In response to the role played by the illicit trade in diamonds in fueling conflict and human rights violations in certain areas of the world, and to differentiate between the trade in conflict diamonds and the trade in legitimate diamonds, the United States and numerous other countries announced in the Interlaken Declaration of November 5, 2002, the launch of the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS) for rough diamonds. Under the KPCS, participating countries prohibit the importation of rough diamonds from, or the exportation of rough diamonds to, a non-participant and require that shipments of rough diamonds from or to a participating country be controlled through the KPCS. The U.S. Secretary of State is responsible for providing an up-to-date listing of all participants in the KPCS. Swaziland was added to the list of participants in the KPCS and the addition was announced in the Federal Register (77 FR 27831) on May 11, 2012, and Cambodia, Cameroon, Kazakhstan, and Panama were added to the list of participants and announced in the Federal Register (78 FR 12135) on February 21, 2013. II. Clean Diamond Trade Act and Executive Order The Clean Diamond Trade Act (the Act), Public Law 108–19, 117 Stat. 631 (19 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.), was enacted on April 25, 2003. Section 4 of the Act requires the President, subject to certain waiver authorities, to prohibit the importation into, or exportation from, the United States of any rough diamond, from whatever source, that has not been controlled through the KPCS. Section 5(a) of the Act authorizes the President to issue such proclamations, regulations, licenses, and orders, and conduct such investigations, as may be necessary to carry out the Act. Section 5(b) of the Act sets forth the general recordkeeping requirements that apply to persons seeking to export from or import into the United States any rough diamonds. Section 5(b) specifically provides that any United States person seeking to export from or import into the United States any rough diamonds shall keep a full record of, in the form of reports or otherwise, complete information relating to any act or transaction to which any prohibition imposed under section 4(a) of the Act applies. Section 5(b) further provides that such person may be required to furnish such information under oath, including the production of books of E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM 08JYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 130 (Monday, July 8, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40625-40627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16125]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Part 104

[Notice 2013-09]


Reporting Ultimate Payees of Political Committee Disbursements

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Notice of interpretive rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission is clarifying its 
interpretation of the regulatory requirement that political committees

[[Page 40626]]

report the full name and address of each person to whom they make 
expenditures or other disbursements aggregating more than $200 per 
calendar year, or per election cycle for authorized committees, and the 
date, amount, and purpose of such payments, in three situations: A 
political committee reimburses an individual who advanced personal 
funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than $200 to a single 
vendor; a political committee pays a credit card bill that includes a 
charge of more than $200 for a single vendor; and a candidate uses 
personal funds to pay his or her authorized committee's expenses that 
aggregate more than $200 to a single vendor without receiving 
reimbursement.

DATES: July 8, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy L. Rothstein, Assistant General 
Counsel, or Joanna S. Waldstreicher, Attorney, 999 E Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Political committees must report the name 
and address of each person to whom they make expenditures or other 
disbursements aggregating more than $200 per calendar year, or per 
election cycle for authorized committees, as well as the date, amount, 
and purpose of such payments. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(5), (6); 11 CFR 
104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii) (unauthorized committees); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i), 
(vi) (authorized committees); see also 11 CFR 104.9(a), (b).
    The Commission published a draft Notice on January 31, 2013, to 
seek comment on a proposed interpretative rule to clarify these 
requirements as they apply to the reporting of certain itemized 
disbursements by political committees to vendors. The Commission 
received four comments: Two opposed the draft; one supported the draft 
with a request that the Commission impose an additional reporting 
requirement; and one resubmitted the comment supporting the draft 
without itself opining on the draft. Taking those comments into 
consideration the Commission now issues this Notice to clarify its 
interpretation of 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i), (vii); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i), 
(vi); and 11 CFR 104.9(a), (b). These clarifications are made to the 
reporting requirements contained in these Commission regulations and 
implicate no other regulations than those referenced above.
    Specifically, this Notice clarifies how a political committee 
should report disbursements in the following scenarios:
    (1) The committee reimburses an individual (such as a campaign 
staffer) who used personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating 
more than $200 to a single vendor;
    (2) the committee's payment of its credit card bill includes 
charges of more than $200 to a single vendor; and
    (3) the committee is the authorized committee of a candidate who 
used personal funds to pay committee expenses aggregating more than 
$200 to a single vendor without receiving reimbursement.
    As explained further below, in each scenario the political 
committee will satisfy the reporting requirements by itemizing as a 
memo entry on Schedule B the name and address of the original vendor, 
as well as the date, amount, and purpose of the original purchase made 
for or by the political committee. The Commission makes clear that this 
interpretation is based on long-standing Commission practice and is not 
making any fundamental changes to its rules or processes. Further, the 
Commission is only addressing the three issues at hand and is not 
extending the clarification to situations in which a vendor, acting as 
the committee's agent, purchases goods and services on the committee's 
behalf from subvendors. The relationship between committees and its 
vendors raises different issues than the relationships that exist in 
these three circumstances.

1. Reimbursements to Individuals for Certain Out-of-Pocket Expenses

    When an individual who is not acting as a vendor advances his or 
her personal funds, including a personal credit card, to pay costs 
incurred in providing goods or services to, or obtaining goods or 
services that are used by or on behalf of, a political committee, the 
political committee must treat the individual's payment as a 
contribution.\1\ 11 CFR 116.5(a), (b). The political committee must 
also treat the obligation arising from the individual's payment as an 
outstanding debt until reimbursed. 11 CFR 116.5(c); see also 11 CFR 
104.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Certain travel and subsistence expenses that are not 
reimbursed, or that are reimbursed within a limited period of time, 
are exempt. 11 CFR 116.5(b); see also 11 CFR 100.79.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the political committee itemizes its reimbursement to the 
individual on Schedule B of its report filed with the Commission, then 
the political committee may also need to provide information about the 
vendor to which the individual made payment in a memo entry associated 
with the reimbursement. A memo entry is required for any reimbursement 
of expenses other than travel and subsistence expenses if the 
individual's payments to the vendor on behalf of the committee 
aggregate more than $200 in a calendar year (or election cycle for 
authorized committees). When the reimbursement is for travel and 
subsistence advances that exceed $500, a memo entry is required for 
each payment to a specific vendor by that individual on behalf of the 
political committee if total payments to that vendor by the political 
committee or by that individual on behalf of the committee aggregate 
more than $200 in a calendar year (or election cycle for authorized 
committees). Each memo entry must include the name and address of the 
vendor, as well as the date, amount, and purpose of the payment. 11 CFR 
104.3(b)(4)(i); 11 CFR 104.9.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ This clarification is consistent with the Commission's 
Report Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the 
2011-2012 Election Cycle, p. 98 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/RAD_Procedures.pdf), which is approved by the Commission for every two-
year election cycle. Further, the Commission's Reports Analysis 
Division has been sending Requests for Additional Information to 
authorized committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee for 
reimbursements to staff above the applicable thresholds since the 
1983-1984 election cycle. Similarly, the Reports Analysis Division 
has been sending Requests for Additional Information to party and 
non-party committees that did not itemize the ultimate payee for 
reimbursements to staff above the applicable thresholds since the 
2005-2006 election cycle after internal review procedures for 
authorized and unauthorized committees were merged. However, a grace 
period for calendar year 2005 was provided to party and non-party 
committees to allow for the development of administrative tracking 
systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For reimbursements of credit card payments, the memo entry must 
include the name and address of the vendor that provided the goods or 
services to the political committee, rather than the credit card 
company that processed the payment, and the date, amount, and purpose 
of the payment to the vendor. Further information about the reporting 
of credit card payments appears in Section 2, below.

2. Payments to Credit Card Companies

    Any political committee that itemizes disbursements to credit card 
companies on Schedule B of its report filed with the Commission must 
itemize as a memo entry any transaction with a single vendor charged on 
the credit card that exceeds the $200 itemization threshold. The memo 
entry must include the name and address of the vendor, and the date, 
amount, and purpose of the charge. Itemizing the ultimate payee, as the 
provider of goods or services to the political committee, accurately 
reflects the credit card company's limited role as a payment

[[Page 40627]]

processor rather than as the provider of goods and services to the 
committee. See 11 CFR 102.9. The itemization requirement prevents a 
committee from avoiding the Act's disclosure requirements by placing 
operating expenditures on a credit card.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This clarification is consistent with the Commission's 
Report Analysis Division Review and Referral Procedures for the 
2011-2012 Election Cycle, p. 96 (https://www.fec.gov/pdf/RAD_Procedures.pdf). Similarly with reimbursements to committee staff, 
the Commission's Reports Analysis Division has been sending Requests 
for Additional Information to authorized committees that did not 
provide memo entries for credit card payments above the applicable 
thresholds since the 1983-1984 election cycle.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Unreimbursed Disbursements by Candidates

    A candidate may make unlimited expenditures from personal funds on 
behalf of his or her authorized committee. See 11 CFR 110.10. Any 
candidate who ``makes a disbursement in connection with [his or her 
own] campaign, shall be considered . . . as having made the 
disbursement . . . as an agent of the authorized committee or 
committees of such candidate.'' 2 U.S.C. 432(e)(2); see also 11 CFR 
101.2(a). Authorized committees must disclose these disbursements on 
their reports filed with the Commission just as they would disclose any 
other disbursements that they may make. 2 U.S.C. 434(b)(4), (5), 
(6)(A); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4).
    Thus, out-of-pocket spending by candidates, as agents of their 
authorized committees, requires memo entry itemization of the ultimate 
payee if the aggregate amount of payments to that vendor exceeds $200 
for the election cycle. The memo entry must include the date, amount, 
and purpose of the out-of-pocket payments, as well as the name and 
address of the vendor to which payment was made.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Unlike the former two circumstances, this scenario is not 
addressed in the Commission's Reports Analysis Division Review and 
Referral Procedures for the 2011-2012 Election Cycle that has been 
made public with redactions. Although the Reports Analysis Division 
will initiate a regular practice of sending Requests for Additional 
Information for failure to itemize the vendor for candidate out-of-
pocket expenditures on behalf of his or her authorized committee, 
this portion of the interpretive rule will be applied prospectively. 
The adequacy of the responses to Requests for Additional Information 
on this issue will only be judged for those sent after the adoption 
of this interpretive rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This interpretive rule clarifies the Commission's interpretation of 
existing statutory and regulatory provisions, and therefore does not 
constitute an agency action subject to the notice and comment 
requirements or a delayed effective date under the Administrative 
Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 553. The provisions of the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, which apply when notice and comment are required by 
the Administrative Procedure Act or another statute, do not apply. See 
5 U.S.C. 603(a).

    Dated: June 27, 2013.

    On behalf of the Commission.
Ellen L. Weintraub,
Chair, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-16125 Filed 7-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.