Safety Zone; Antique Boat Show, Niagara River, Grand Island, NY, 40081-40084 [2013-16053]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
6. Protest Activities
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the creation of a special
local regulation issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine parade. This
rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(h) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
40081
(1) Event Area. All waters of Biscayne
Bay, Miami, FL, between Bayfront Park
and the Intercontinental-Miami Hotel
encompassed within the following
points: Starting at point 1 in position
25°46′32″ N, 80°11′06″ W; thence
southeast to point 2 in position
25°46′30″ N, 80°11′04″ W; thence south
to point 3 in position 25°46′26″ N,
80°11′04″ W; thence southwest to point
4 in position 25°46′25″ N, 80°11′06″ W;
thence north back to origin.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Miami in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations.
(1) All non-participant persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the event area without
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Miami or a designated
representative.
(2) Non-participant persons and
vessels desiring to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the event
area may contact the Captain of the Port
Miami by telephone at 305–535–4472,
or a designated representative via VHF
radio on channel 16. If authorization to
transit through the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port
Miami or a designated representative,
all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port
Miami or a designated representative.
(d) Effective/Enforcement Date. This
rule is effective and enforced from 10
a.m. until 6 p.m. on September 21, 2013.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
C.P. Scraba,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Miami.
[FR Doc. 2013–16059 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a § 100.35T07–0180 to read as
follows:
33 CFR Part 165
§ 100.35T07–0180 Special Local
Regulation; Red Bull Flugtag, Biscayne
Bay; Miami, FL.
RIN 1625–AA00
■
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is established. All
coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0418]
Safety Zone; Antique Boat Show,
Niagara River, Grand Island, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
40082
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone on
Niagara River, Grand Island, NY. This
proposed rule is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Niagara
River during the Antique Boat Show
powerboat races. The safety zone
established by this proposed rule is
necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with powerboat
races.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0418 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Delivery: at the same as mail
address above, deliveries are accepted
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except federal holidays.
The telephone number is 202–366–
9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these three methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterway Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–
843–9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2013–0418),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when the
comment is successfully transmitted. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when the comment
is received at the Docket Management
Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2013–0418] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2013–0418) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Antique Boat Show is an annual
event involving hydroplane and power
boat races that has taken place over the
last 36 years. The Antique Boat Show
takes place on the Niagara River within
a 2.5 mile course located near the
Buffalo Launch Club in Grand Island,
NY. Typically, the event takes place on
the first or second Saturday of
September. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo has determined that hydroplane
racing presents significant hazards to
public spectators and participants.
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
This proposed temporary safety zone
is necessary to guard against the hazards
mentioned in the preceding paragraph.
The proposed safety zone will be
effective and enforced from 9:30 a.m.
until 4:30 p.m. on September 7, 2013.
The proposed safety zone will
encompass all waters of Niagara River,
Grand Island, NY starting at position
42°59′59″ N, 078°56′22″ W, East to
49°59′54″ N, 078°56′14″ W, South to
42°57′54″ N, 078°56′04″ W, West to
42°057′48″ N, 078°56′22″ W. (NAD 83)
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the proposed safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will
not interfere with other agencies, will
not adversely alter the budget of any
grant or loan recipients, and will not
raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this
proposed rule will be relatively small
and enforced for relatively short time.
Also, the proposed safety zone is
designed to minimize its impact on
navigable waters. Furthermore, the
proposed safety zone has been designed
to allow vessels to transit around it.
Thus, restrictions on vessel movement
within that particular area are expected
to be minimal. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the proposed safety zone
when permitted by the Captain of the
Port.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed temporary final rule may
affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the
owners of operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of the
Niagara River near Grand Island, NY
between 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on
September 7, 2013.
This proposed safety zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: this proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
rule will be in effect for only a few
hours and the proposed safety zone will
allow vessels to move freely around the
proposed safety zone on the Niagara
River. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this proposed rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40083
7. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
9. Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
40084
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
the human environment. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2–1, paragraph (34) (g), of the
Commandant Instruction because it
involves the establishment of a safety
zone.
A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and a preliminary categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 14, 2013.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2013–16053 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
34 CFR Chapter II
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
Proposed Requirement—Migrant
Education Program Consortium
Incentive Grant Program
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T09–0418 to read as
follows:
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Proposed requirement.
AGENCY:
■
[CFDA Number 84.144F]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.T09–0418 Safety Zone; Antique Boat
Festival, Niagara River, Grand Island, NY
(a) Location. The safety zone will
encompass all waters of the Niagara
River, Grand Island, NY starting at
position 42°59′59″ N, 078°56′22″ W,
East to 42°59′54″ N, 078°56′14″ W,
South to 42°57′54″ N, 078°56′04″ W,
West to 42°057′48″ N, 078°56′22″ W.
(NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This regulation is effective and will be
enforced on September 7, 2013, from
9:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general
regulations in section 165.23 of this
part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Buffalo is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been designated
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act
on his behalf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:44 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
The Assistant Secretary for
Elementary and Secondary Education
proposes to change the maximum
duration of grants awarded to State
educational agencies (SEAs) under the
Migrant Education Program (MEP)
Consortium Incentive Grant (CIG)
Program from two years to three years.
We take this action to allow
participating SEAs to have an additional
year to conduct needed activities,
evaluate their projects, and provide a
final report addressing their success in
completing project activities and
achieving the objectives and outcomes
that were established in their approved
CIG program application.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before August 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to: Lisa Gillette,
U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3E313,
Washington, DC 20202–6135.
If you prefer to send your comments
by email, use the following address:
lisa.gillette@ed.gov. You must include
the term ‘‘CIG-Duration’’ in the subject
line of your electronic message.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Gillette. Telephone: (202) 260–1426, or
by email: lisa.gillette@ed.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
Invitation
to Comment: We invite you to submit
comments regarding this notice.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 and their overall requirement
of reducing regulatory burden that
might result from this proposed
requirement. Please let us know of any
further ways we could reduce potential
costs or increase potential benefits
while preserving the effective and
efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this notice in room 3E313, 400
Maryland Avenue, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday
through Friday of each week except
Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this notice. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Purpose of Program: The MEP,
authorized in title I, part C, section 1301
et seq. of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA) (20 U.S.C. 6391 et seq.), is a
State-operated and State-administered
formula grant program. The MEP helps
SEAs support high-quality and
comprehensive educational programs
that do two things: provide migratory
children with appropriate educational
and supportive services that address
their special needs in a coordinated and
efficient manner, and give migratory
children the opportunity to meet the
same challenging State academic
content and student academic
achievement standards that all children
are expected to meet.
One component of the MEP is the CIG
program, authorized in section 1308(d)
of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 6398(d)).
Through the MEP CIG program, the
Department provides financial
incentives to SEAs to participate in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40081-40084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16053]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0418]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Antique Boat Show, Niagara River, Grand Island, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40082]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on Niagara River, Grand Island, NY. This proposed rule is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the Niagara River during the Antique
Boat Show powerboat races. The safety zone established by this proposed
rule is necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from
the hazards associated with powerboat races.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2013-0418 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Delivery: at the same as mail address above, deliveries are
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these three methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of Waterway Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-843-9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2013-0418), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online at https://www.regulations.gov or by fax, mail, or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online,
it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when the comment is
successfully transmitted. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when the
comment is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or
a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2013-0418] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2013-0418) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The Antique Boat Show is an annual event involving hydroplane and
power boat races that has taken place over the last 36 years. The
Antique Boat Show takes place on the Niagara River within a 2.5 mile
course located near the Buffalo Launch Club in Grand Island, NY.
Typically, the event takes place on the first or second Saturday of
September. The Captain of the Port Buffalo has determined that
hydroplane racing presents significant hazards to public spectators and
participants.
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
This proposed temporary safety zone is necessary to guard against
the hazards mentioned in the preceding paragraph. The proposed safety
zone will be effective and enforced from 9:30 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. on
September 7, 2013. The proposed safety zone will encompass all waters
of Niagara River, Grand Island, NY starting at position 42[deg]59'59''
N, 078[deg]56'22'' W, East to 49[deg]59'54'' N, 078[deg]56'14'' W,
South to 42[deg]57'54'' N, 078[deg]56'04'' W, West to 42[deg]057'48''
N, 078[deg]56'22'' W. (NAD 83)
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the proposed safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or his on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
[[Page 40083]]
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action because we anticipate that
it will have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with
other agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or
loan recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues.
The safety zone created by this proposed rule will be relatively small
and enforced for relatively short time. Also, the proposed safety zone
is designed to minimize its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore,
the proposed safety zone has been designed to allow vessels to transit
around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel movement within that particular
area are expected to be minimal. Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the proposed safety zone when
permitted by the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This proposed temporary final
rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners of operators of vessels intending to transit or
anchor in a portion of the Niagara River near Grand Island, NY between
9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on September 7, 2013.
This proposed safety zone will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: this proposed rule will be in effect for only a few hours and
the proposed safety zone will allow vessels to move freely around the
proposed safety zone on the Niagara River. If you think that your
business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a
small entity and that this proposed rule would have a significant
economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES)
explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this
proposed rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
12. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on
[[Page 40084]]
the human environment. This proposed rule is categorically excluded,
under figure 2-1, paragraph (34) (g), of the Commandant Instruction
because it involves the establishment of a safety zone.
A preliminary environmental analysis checklist and a preliminary
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0418 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0418 Safety Zone; Antique Boat Festival, Niagara River,
Grand Island, NY
(a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of the
Niagara River, Grand Island, NY starting at position 42[deg]59'59'' N,
078[deg]56'22'' W, East to 42[deg]59'54'' N, 078[deg]56'14'' W, South
to 42[deg]57'54'' N, 078[deg]56'04'' W, West to 42[deg]057'48'' N,
078[deg]56'22'' W. (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This regulation is effective
and will be enforced on September 7, 2013, from 9:30 a.m. until 4:30
p.m.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in section 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Buffalo to act on his
behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 14, 2013.
S.M. Wischmann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2013-16053 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P