Safety Zone; Grand Haven 4th of July Fireworks; Grand River; Grand Haven, MI, 39998-40000 [2013-16043]
Download as PDF
39998
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
into and control the regulated area. The
PATCOM shall be designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon
request, allow the transit of commercial
vessels through regulated areas when it
is safe to do so.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.1191 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with extensive
advance notification of the safety zone
and its enforcement period via the Local
Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of the
Port determines that the regulated area
need not be enforced for the full
duration stated in this notice, a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners may be
used to grant general permission to
enter the regulated area.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2013–16040 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0547]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Grand Haven 4th of July
Fireworks; Grand River; Grand Haven,
MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Grand River in Grand Haven,
Michigan. This safety zone is intended
to restrict vessels from a portion of the
Grand River due to a fireworks display.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to protect the surrounding public and
vessels from the hazards associated with
the fireworks display.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:30
p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0547. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph
McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at 414–747–7148 or
Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
A. Regulatory History and Information
This annual fireworks display is
codified in 33 CFR 165.929(a)(19).
However, the Coast Guard was informed
by the event organizer that this year’s
fireworks will be shot from a different
location than what is shown in 33 CFR
165.929(a)(19). This temporary final rule
reflects the new launch site for this
year’s event.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing an
NPRM with respect to this rule because
it is impracticable. The final details for
this event were not known to the Coast
Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date
of this rule to wait for a comment period
to run would be both impracticable
because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard’s ability to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
a maritime fireworks display, which are
discussed further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
regulated navigation areas and limited
access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6,
160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
On July 4, 2013, the City of Grand
Haven will host a fireworks display.
Fireworks will be launched from a
position on the west bank of the Grand
River in Grand Haven, Michigan. The
Coast Guard, after speaking with the
event organizer, anticipates that a large
number of spectator vessels will be
present in the Grand River on the night
of the display. As such, the Captain of
the Port, Lake Michigan, has determined
that this fireworks display will pose a
significant risk to public safety and
property. Such hazards include falling
debris, flaming debris, and collisions
among spectator vessels.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, has determined that this
temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the fireworks display in
Grand Haven, Michigan. This rule is
effective and will be enforced from 9:30
p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013.
The safety zone will encompass all
waters of the Grand River within the arc
of a circle with an 800 foot radius with
a center in position 43°3′ 55.7″ N and
86°14′ 13.8″ W (NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan, or his designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone created by this rule will be small
and enforced for only two hours on a
single day in July. Under certain
conditions, moreover, vessels may still
transit through the safety zone when
permitted by the Captain of the Port.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will
affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of the
Grand River on July 4, 2013.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reasons noted in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section.
Additionally, before the enforcement of
the zone, we would issue local
Broadcast Notice to Mariners so vessel
owners and operators can plan
accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39999
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
40000
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
[FR Doc. 2013–16043 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
RIN 1625–AA00
■
2. Add § 165.T09–0547 to read as
follows:
■
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. All waters of the Grand
River within the arc of a circle with an
800 foot radius with a center in position
43° 3′ 55.7″ N and 86° 14′ 13.8″ W (NAD
83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This rule is effective and will be
enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
on July 4, 2013.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative.
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
Eighth Coast Guard District Annual
Safety Zones; Riverfront Independence
Festival Fireworks; Ohio River 607.0–
609.0; New Albany, KY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
§ 165.T09–0547 Safety Zone; Grand Haven
4th of July fireworks; Grand River, Grand
Haven, MI.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0331]
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a Safety Zone for the Riverfront
Independence Festival Fireworks on the
Ohio River 607.0 to 609.0 from 9:30
p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2013.
This action is necessary for the
safeguard of participants and spectators,
including all crews, vessels, and
persons on navigable waters during the
Riverfront Independence Festival
Fireworks. During the enforcement
period, in accordance with a previously
established Safety Zone, entry into,
transiting through or anchoring in the
Safety Zone is prohibited to all vessels
not registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels,
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Ohio Valley
or a designated representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.801 will be enforced from 9:30 p.m.
until 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice of
enforcement, call Petty Officer Second
Class Catherine M. Lawson, Coast Guard
Sector Ohio Valley at 502–779–5432, or
by email at
Catherine.M.Lawson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Safety Zone for
the annual Riverfront Independence
Festival Fireworks listed in 33 CFR
165.801 Table 1, Table No. 18; Sector
Ohio Valley, No. 21 on July 3, 2013 from
9:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.801, entry into the Safety Zone
listed in Table 1, Table No. 18; Sector
Ohio Valley, No. 21 is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a designated representative. Persons or
vessels desiring to enter into or pass
through the Safety Zone must request
permission from the Captain of the Port
or a designated representative. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port or
designated representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1. In
addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with advance
notification of this enforcement period
via Local Notice to Mariners and Marine
Information Broadcasts.
If the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
or Patrol Commander determines that
the Safety Zone need not be enforced for
the full duration stated in this notice of
enforcement, he or she may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant
general permission to enter the
regulated area.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
L.W. Hewett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2013–16046 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 50
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0210; FRL–9822–1]
RIN 2060–AP89
Method for the Determination of Lead
in Total Suspended Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is establishing a new
Federal Reference Method (FRM) for
measuring Lead (Pb) in total suspended
particulate matter (TSP) collected from
ambient air. This method is intended for
use by analytical laboratories
performing the analysis of Pb in TSP to
support data collection for the Pb
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). The existing FRM for Pb is
designated as a new Federal Equivalent
Method (FEM), and the currently
designated FEMs are retained. This
action avoids any disruption to existing
Pb monitoring networks and data
collection and does not affect the FRM
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39998-40000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16043]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0547]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Grand Haven 4th of July Fireworks; Grand River;
Grand Haven, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Grand River in Grand Haven, Michigan. This safety zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of the Grand River due to a fireworks
display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated with the
fireworks display.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July
4, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0547. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at 414-747-7148 or Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
A. Regulatory History and Information
This annual fireworks display is codified in 33 CFR 165.929(a)(19).
However, the Coast Guard was informed by the event organizer that this
year's fireworks will be shot from a different location than what is
shown in 33 CFR 165.929(a)(19). This temporary final rule reflects the
new launch site for this year's event.
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM with respect to this rule
because it is impracticable. The final details for this event were not
known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time remaining
before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date
of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would be both
impracticable because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to
protect spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with a
maritime fireworks display, which are discussed further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
On July 4, 2013, the City of Grand Haven will host a fireworks
display. Fireworks will be launched from a position on the west bank of
the Grand River in Grand Haven, Michigan. The Coast Guard, after
speaking with the event organizer, anticipates that a large number of
spectator vessels will be present in the Grand River on the night of
the display. As such, the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has
determined that this fireworks display will pose a significant risk to
public safety and property. Such hazards include falling debris,
flaming debris, and collisions among spectator vessels.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the
fireworks display in Grand Haven, Michigan. This rule is effective and
will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013. The
safety zone will encompass all waters of the Grand River within the arc
of a circle with an 800 foot radius with a center in position 43[deg]3'
55.7'' N and 86[deg]14' 13.8'' W (NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and
[[Page 39999]]
does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of
Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under those Orders. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be
small and enforced for only two hours on a single day in July. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Grand River
on July 4, 2013.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons noted in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the
enforcement of the zone, we would issue local Broadcast Notice to
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
[[Page 40000]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0547 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0547 Safety Zone; Grand Haven 4th of July fireworks;
Grand River, Grand Haven, MI.
(a) Location. All waters of the Grand River within the arc of a
circle with an 800 foot radius with a center in position 43[deg] 3'
55.7'' N and 86[deg] 14' 13.8'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This rule is effective and
will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan to
act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or his on-scene representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate
in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013-16043 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P