Draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff Guidance, 40199-40200 [2013-15982]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Notices publications, research material, and working files. Proposed for permanent retention are significant correspondence, final reports and publications, audio visual material, and the commission’s Web site. 20. National Archives and Records Administration, Research Services (N2– 288–12–1, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Records of the National Endowment for the Arts comprising program grant case files from 1965 to 1996. These records were accessioned to the National Archives but lack sufficient historical value to warrant continued preservation. 21. National Archives and Records Administration, Research Services (DAA–0064–2013–0001, 1 item, 1 temporary item). Records include federal agencies’ Web site snapshots and related documentation harvested in the 2001 Web Snapshot Initiative Project. 22. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, Office of the Executive Secretary (N1–455–11–3, 2 items, 2 temporary items). Published Internet Web site content and Web site design records. Dated: June 27, 2013. Laurence Brewer, Director, National Records Management Program. [FR Doc. 2013–16003 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7515–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2013–0140] Draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff Guidance Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for public comment. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requests public comment on Draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff Guidance No. 24 (SFST–ISG–24), Revision 0, ‘‘The Use of a Demonstration Program as Confirmation of Integrity for Continued Storage of High Burnup Fuel Beyond 20 Years.’’ The draft SFST–ISG provides guidance to the staff for reviewing if a demonstration of high burnup fuel (HBF) has the necessary properties to qualify as one method that an applicant might use in license and certificate of compliance (CoC) applications to demonstrate compliance with the NRC’s regulations. This guidance applies to license and CoC applications for the emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Jul 02, 2013 Jkt 229001 storage of HBF for periods greater than 20 years. DATES: Submit comments by August 19, 2013. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so; however, the NRC is only able to ensure consideration of comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comment by any of the following methods (unless this document describes a different method for submitting comments on a specific subject): • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2013–0140. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2013–0140. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. • Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001. For additional direction on accessing information and submitting comments, see ‘‘Accessing Information and Submitting Comments’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Einziger, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–287–9217 or email: Robert.Einziger@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments A. Accessing Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2013– 0140 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may access information related to this document, which the NRC possesses and is publicly-available, by the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2013–0140. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly- PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 40199 available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft SFST–ISG–24, Revision 0 is available electronically under ADAMS Accession No. ML13056A516. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC–2013– 0140 in the subject line of your comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make your comment submission available to the public in this docket. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http:// www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS. II. Background The NRC issues SFST–ISGs to communicate insights and lessons learned and to address emergent issues not covered in SFST Standard Review Plans (SRPs). In this way, the NRC staff and stakeholders may use the guidance in an SFST–ISG document before it is incorporated into a formal SRP revision. The draft SFST–ISG provides guidance to the staff for reviewing if a demonstration of high burnup fuel (HBF) has the necessary properties to qualify as one method that an applicant might use in license and certificate of compliance (CoC) applications to demonstrate compliance with sections E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1 40200 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Notices 72.122(h)(1) and 72.122(l) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). This guidance applies to license and CoC applications for the storage of HBF for periods greater than 20 years. This guidance supplements the guidance given in NUREG–1927 ‘‘Standard Review Plan for Renewal of Spent Fuel Dry Cask Storage System Licenses and Certificates of Compliance’’ on aging management for the interior of the cask. emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Action By this action, the NRC is requesting public comments on draft SFST–ISG– 24. This SFST–ISG proposes certain revisions to NRC guidance on implementation of the requirements in 10 CFR part 72. The NRC will make a final determination regarding issuance of SFST–ISG–24 after it considers any public comments received in response to this request. Backfitting and Issue Finality This draft ISG, if finalized, would provide guidance to the staff for reviewing an application for an independent spent fuel storage Installation, and an application for a certificate of compliance, either of which involve storage of high-burn-up spent fuel from a nuclear power plant, with respect to compliance with 10 CFR 72.122(h)(1) and 10 CFR 72.122(l). Issuance of this draft ISG, if finalized, would not constitute backfitting as defined in the backfitting provisions in 10 CFR 72.62 which are applicable to ISFSIs and certificates of compliance. Issuance of the draft ISG, if finalized, would also not constitute backfitting under 10 CFR 50.109, or otherwise be inconsistent with the issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The staff’s position is based upon the following considerations. • The draft ISG positions do not constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the ISG is internal guidance directed at the NRC staff with respect to their regulatory responsibilities • Backfitting and issue finality—with limited exceptions not applicable here— do not protect current or future applicants • The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG positions on existing ESP, DCR, and COL applicants where the staff has resolved the applicant’s conformance with RG 1.221 as of the effective date of this guidance • The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG positions on current licensees or the four current design certifications (10 CFR Part 52, Appendices A through D) either now or in the future VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:48 Jul 02, 2013 Jkt 229001 Each of these considerations is discussed in more detail below. 1. The draft ISG positions, if finalized, do not constitute backfitting, inasmuch as the ISG is internal guidance to NRC staff. The ISG provides interim guidance to the staff on how to review an application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of licensing. Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which either nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under either the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of Part 52. 2. Backfitting and issue finality do not—with limited exceptions not applicable here—protect current or future applicants. Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality provisions under Part 52. This is because neither the Backfit Rule nor the issue finality provisions under Part 52—with certain exclusions discussed below—were intended to apply to every NRC action which substantially changes the expectations of current and future applicants. The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an applicant references a Part 52 license (e.g., an early site permit) and/or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification rule) with specified issue finality provisions. The staff does not, at this time, intend to impose the positions represented in the draft ISG section (if finalized) in a manner that is inconsistent with any issue finality provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the draft ISG section (if finalized) in a manner which does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision. The draft ISG addresses newly-adopted or revised regulations whose backfitting and issue finality considerations have already been addressed 3. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG positions on existing early site permit, design certificate and combined license applicants where the staff has resolved the applicant’s conformance with RG 1.221 as of the effective date of this guidance. Notwithstanding the NRC’s general principle, articulated in Item 2 above, that Backfitting and Issue Finality do not protect applicants, the draft ISG is not backfitting because the NRC does not intend to impose the draft ISG positions on existing ESP, DCR, and PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 COL applicants where the staff has resolved the applicant’s conformance with RG 1.221 as of the effective date of this guidance. 4. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG positions on existing licensees and regulatory approvals, either now or in the future. The staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions described in the draft ISG section to existing (already issued) licenses and regulatory approvals—including the four existing design certifications in 10 CFR part 52, Appendices A through D. Hence, the issuance of a final ISG—even if considered guidance which is within the purview of the issue finality provisions in Part 52—need not be evaluated as if it were a backfit or as being inconsistent with issue finality provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in the ISG on holders of already issued holders of licenses in a manner which does not provide issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must, as applicable, make the showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule, or address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described applicable issue finality provision. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of June, 2013. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Mark D. Lombard, Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2013–15982 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 72–1004, 72–40, 50–269, 50– 270, and 50–287; NRC–2013–0135] Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1, 2, and 3; Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. AGENCY: The NRC is issuing an environmental assessment (EA) and a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for an exemption request submitted by Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, on August 13, 2012 for the Oconee Nuclear Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Facility (ISFSI). SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03JYN1.SGM 03JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40199-40200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15982]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[NRC-2013-0140]


Draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff 
Guidance

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requests public 
comment on Draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff 
Guidance No. 24 (SFST-ISG-24), Revision 0, ``The Use of a Demonstration 
Program as Confirmation of Integrity for Continued Storage of High 
Burnup Fuel Beyond 20 Years.'' The draft SFST-ISG provides guidance to 
the staff for reviewing if a demonstration of high burnup fuel (HBF) 
has the necessary properties to qualify as one method that an applicant 
might use in license and certificate of compliance (CoC) applications 
to demonstrate compliance with the NRC's regulations. This guidance 
applies to license and CoC applications for the storage of HBF for 
periods greater than 20 years.

DATES: Submit comments by August 19, 2013. Comments received after this 
date will be considered if it is practical to do so; however, the NRC 
is only able to ensure consideration of comments received on or before 
this date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comment by any of the following methods 
(unless this document describes a different method for submitting 
comments on a specific subject):
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0140. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-492-
3668; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual(s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 
of this document.
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0140. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-492-
3668; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
     Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, 
Announcements, and Directives Branch (RADB), Office of Administration, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    For additional direction on accessing information and submitting 
comments, see ``Accessing Information and Submitting Comments'' in the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Einziger, Office of Nuclear 
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-287-9217 or email: 
Robert.Einziger@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Accessing Information and Submitting Comments

A. Accessing Information

    Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0140 when contacting the NRC 
about the availability of information regarding this document. You may 
access information related to this document, which the NRC possesses 
and is publicly-available, by the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0140.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may access publicly-available documents online in the NRC 
Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the 
search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-
based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's 
Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-
4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft SFST-ISG-24, 
Revision 0 is available electronically under ADAMS Accession No. 
ML13056A516.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

B. Submitting Comments

    Please include Docket ID NRC-2013-0140 in the subject line of your 
comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make 
your comment submission available to the public in this docket.
    The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact 
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your 
comment submission. The NRC posts all comment submissions at http://www.regulations.gov as well as entering the comment submissions into 
ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove 
identifying or contact information.
    If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons 
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to 
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be 
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should 
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to 
remove such information before making the comment submissions available 
to the public or entering the comment submissions into ADAMS.

II. Background

    The NRC issues SFST-ISGs to communicate insights and lessons 
learned and to address emergent issues not covered in SFST Standard 
Review Plans (SRPs). In this way, the NRC staff and stakeholders may 
use the guidance in an SFST-ISG document before it is incorporated into 
a formal SRP revision. The draft SFST-ISG provides guidance to the 
staff for reviewing if a demonstration of high burnup fuel (HBF) has 
the necessary properties to qualify as one method that an applicant 
might use in license and certificate of compliance (CoC) applications 
to demonstrate compliance with sections

[[Page 40200]]

72.122(h)(1) and 72.122(l) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR). This guidance applies to license and CoC 
applications for the storage of HBF for periods greater than 20 years. 
This guidance supplements the guidance given in NUREG-1927 ``Standard 
Review Plan for Renewal of Spent Fuel Dry Cask Storage System Licenses 
and Certificates of Compliance'' on aging management for the interior 
of the cask.
Proposed Action
    By this action, the NRC is requesting public comments on draft 
SFST-ISG-24. This SFST-ISG proposes certain revisions to NRC guidance 
on implementation of the requirements in 10 CFR part 72. The NRC will 
make a final determination regarding issuance of SFST-ISG-24 after it 
considers any public comments received in response to this request.
Backfitting and Issue Finality
    This draft ISG, if finalized, would provide guidance to the staff 
for reviewing an application for an independent spent fuel storage 
Installation, and an application for a certificate of compliance, 
either of which involve storage of high-burn-up spent fuel from a 
nuclear power plant, with respect to compliance with 10 CFR 
72.122(h)(1) and 10 CFR 72.122(l).
    Issuance of this draft ISG, if finalized, would not constitute 
backfitting as defined in the backfitting provisions in 10 CFR 72.62 
which are applicable to ISFSIs and certificates of compliance. Issuance 
of the draft ISG, if finalized, would also not constitute backfitting 
under 10 CFR 50.109, or otherwise be inconsistent with the issue 
finality provisions in 10 CFR part 52. The staff's position is based 
upon the following considerations.
     The draft ISG positions do not constitute backfitting, 
inasmuch as the ISG is internal guidance directed at the NRC staff with 
respect to their regulatory responsibilities
     Backfitting and issue finality--with limited exceptions 
not applicable here--do not protect current or future applicants
     The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG 
positions on existing ESP, DCR, and COL applicants where the staff has 
resolved the applicant's conformance with RG 1.221 as of the effective 
date of this guidance
     The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG 
positions on current licensees or the four current design 
certifications (10 CFR Part 52, Appendices A through D) either now or 
in the future
    Each of these considerations is discussed in more detail below.
    1. The draft ISG positions, if finalized, do not constitute 
backfitting, inasmuch as the ISG is internal guidance to NRC staff.
    The ISG provides interim guidance to the staff on how to review an 
application for NRC regulatory approval in the form of licensing. 
Changes in internal staff guidance are not matters for which either 
nuclear power plant applicants or licensees are protected under either 
the Backfit Rule or the issue finality provisions of Part 52.
    2. Backfitting and issue finality do not--with limited exceptions 
not applicable here--protect current or future applicants.
    Applicants and potential applicants are not, with certain 
exceptions, protected by either the Backfit Rule or any issue finality 
provisions under Part 52. This is because neither the Backfit Rule nor 
the issue finality provisions under Part 52--with certain exclusions 
discussed below--were intended to apply to every NRC action which 
substantially changes the expectations of current and future 
applicants.
    The exceptions to the general principle are applicable whenever an 
applicant references a Part 52 license (e.g., an early site permit) 
and/or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a design certification rule) with 
specified issue finality provisions. The staff does not, at this time, 
intend to impose the positions represented in the draft ISG section (if 
finalized) in a manner that is inconsistent with any issue finality 
provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a position in 
the draft ISG section (if finalized) in a manner which does not provide 
issue finality as described in the applicable issue finality provision, 
then the staff must address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as 
described in the applicable issue finality provision. The draft ISG 
addresses newly-adopted or revised regulations whose backfitting and 
issue finality considerations have already been addressed
    3. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG positions 
on existing early site permit, design certificate and combined license 
applicants where the staff has resolved the applicant's conformance 
with RG 1.221 as of the effective date of this guidance.
    Notwithstanding the NRC's general principle, articulated in Item 2 
above, that Backfitting and Issue Finality do not protect applicants, 
the draft ISG is not backfitting because the NRC does not intend to 
impose the draft ISG positions on existing ESP, DCR, and COL applicants 
where the staff has resolved the applicant's conformance with RG 1.221 
as of the effective date of this guidance.
    4. The NRC staff has no intention to impose the draft ISG positions 
on existing licensees and regulatory approvals, either now or in the 
future.
    The staff does not intend to impose or apply the positions 
described in the draft ISG section to existing (already issued) 
licenses and regulatory approvals--including the four existing design 
certifications in 10 CFR part 52, Appendices A through D. Hence, the 
issuance of a final ISG--even if considered guidance which is within 
the purview of the issue finality provisions in Part 52--need not be 
evaluated as if it were a backfit or as being inconsistent with issue 
finality provisions. If, in the future, the staff seeks to impose a 
position in the ISG on holders of already issued holders of licenses in 
a manner which does not provide issue finality as described in the 
applicable issue finality provision, then the staff must, as 
applicable, make the showing as set forth in the Backfit Rule, or 
address the criteria for avoiding issue finality as described 
applicable issue finality provision.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of June, 2013.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark D. Lombard,
Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2013-15982 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P