Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Helicopters, 40047-40050 [2013-15956]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2010–21–01 (75 FR 63050, October 14,
2010), and adding the following new
AD:
■
Eurocopter France: Docket No. FAA–2013–
0354; Directorate Identifier 2011–SW–
072–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to Eurocopter France
Model AS350B, BA, B1, B2, B3, D, AS355E,
F, F1, F2, and N helicopters with collectiveto-yaw control coupling, part number
350A27–2178–04, 350A27–2178–06, or
350A27–2178–0601, certificated in any
category.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
reduced yaw control travel, which could
result in loss of control of the helicopter.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2010–21–01,
Amendment 39–16461 (75 FR 63050, October
14, 2010).
(d) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by September
3, 2013.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Within 10 hours time-in-service (TIS) or
within one month, whichever occurs first,
determine whether the cross-member
(numbered ‘‘1’’) at station X 2165 and the two
doublers (numbered ‘‘2’’ and ‘‘3’’) at stations
X 2325 and Y 269 are installed as shown in
Figure 1 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 53.00.37,
Revision 0, dated April 11, 2007 (EASB
53.00.37), for Model AS350 helicopters and
EASB No. 53.00.23, Revision 0, dated April
11, 2007 (EASB 53.00.23), for Model AS355
helicopters.
(2) If the cross-member (numbered ‘‘1’’)
and doublers (numbered ‘‘2’’ and ‘‘3’’) are not
installed, before further flight, inspect for a
crack in the center cross-member (numbered
‘‘4’’) in the area around the attachment point
of the tail rotor directional ball-type control
as shown in Figure 1 of EASB 53.00.37 for
Model AS350 helicopters or EASB 53.00.23
for Model AS355 helicopters.
(i) If a crack exists, before further flight,
replace the unairworthy center cross-member
(Numbered ‘‘4’’) with an airworthy center
cross-member as described in paragraph (f)(3)
of this AD.
(ii) If a crack does not exist, before further
flight, inspect the tail rotor control rigging to
determine whether it meets conformity
limits.
(A) If all items of the tail rotor control
rigging are found within conformity limits,
install the cross-member and doublers as
described in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
(B) For any items of the tail rotor control
rigging found outside of conformity limits,
perform appropriate corrective action in
accordance with FAA-accepted procedures,
and install the cross-member and doublers as
described in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD.
(3) Within 55 hours TIS, if the cross
member (Numbered ‘‘1’’) is not installed,
install the cross-member at station X 2165
and the 2 doublers (Numbered ‘‘2’’ and ‘‘3’’)
at stations X 2325 and Y 269 by following the
Appendix, the referenced figures 2 and 3 of
EASB 53.00.37 for Model AS350 helicopters
or EASB 53.00.23 for Model AS355
helicopters.
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Gary Roach,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and
Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
gary.b.roach@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(h) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Emergency AD No. 2007–0139–E, dated May
15, 2007 (corrected May 23, 2007). You may
view the EASA AD at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA–2013–0354.
(i) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5320, Fuselage Miscellaneous
Structure.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 11,
2013.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–15961 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0555; Directorate
Identifier 2010–SW–047–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter
Deutschland GmbH Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40047
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD)
Model EC135 and MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters. This proposed AD is
prompted by the discovery during a
routine inspection of loose flight control
bearings because of incorrect
installation. This proposed AD would
require inspecting the flight-control
bearings repetitively, replacing any
loose bearing with an airworthy flightcontrol bearing, and installing bushings
and washers. The proposed actions are
intended to prevent the affected control
lever from shifting, contacting the
helicopter structure, and reducing
control of the helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–
0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://
www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, TX 76137.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
40048
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Matt
Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety Engineer,
Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817)
222–5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued AD No. 2010–0058,
dated March 30, 2010, (AD 2010–0058),
to correct an unsafe condition for the
ECD Model MBB–BK 117 C–2, EC 135
and EC 635 helicopters. EASA advises
that during an inspection of an MBB–BK
117 C–2, ‘‘bearings were detected which
had not been correctly fixed.’’ As some
bearings on the EC 135 and MBB–BK
117 C–2 type designs are installed with
the same procedure, they are equally
affected by the possibility of the unsafe
condition. EASA states that this
condition, if not corrected, could result
in the affected control lever shifting in
the axial direction, contacting the
helicopter structure, and subsequently
reducing control of the helicopter.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by the aviation authority of the Federal
Republic of Germany and are approved
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with
Germany, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the
unsafe condition described in its AD.
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all known relevant
information and determined that an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of
these same type designs.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) MBB BK117 C–2–67A–
010, Revision 3, dated February 8, 2010,
and ASB EC135–67A–019, Revision 3,
dated December 16, 2009. These ASBs
specify:
• Within the next 50 flight hours
(FHs), inspecting the affected bearings
and, if necessary, rebonding any
affected bearings or replacing the lever
assembly.
• Within 12 months, retrofitting
bushings on the levers to prevent
movement of the bearings.
• After the retrofit, repeating the
inspection every 800 FHs or 36 months
for the Model EC 135 helicopters,
whichever comes first, and 600 FHs or
24 months, whichever comes first, for
the Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters.
EASA classified these ASBs as
mandatory and issued AD 2010–0058 to
ensure the continued airworthiness of
these helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
For EC135 helicopters, this proposed
AD would require, within 100 hours
time-in-service (TIS) or at the next
annual inspection, whichever occurs
first, modifying the left-hand (LH) and
right-hand (RH) guidance units and the
cyclic shaft by installing bushings and
washers to prevent shifting in the axial
direction. This proposed AD would
require at intervals not to exceed 800
hours TIS or 36 months, whichever
occurs first, inspecting the bearings in
the LH guidance unit, the RH guidance
unit, cyclic control, upper guidance
unit, and linear voltage differential
transducer plate for play. If any bearing
is loose, the proposed AD would require
replacing the affected bearing with an
airworthy bearing.
For MBB–BK 117 C–2 helicopters,
this proposed AD would require, within
100 hours TIS or at the next annual
inspection, whichever occurs first,
modifying the LH and RH guidance
units and the lateral control lever by
installing bushings and washers to
prevent shifting of the bearings in the
axial direction. This proposed AD also
would require at intervals not to exceed
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
600 hours TIS or 24 months, whichever
occurs first, inspecting the bearings in
the RH guidance unit, LH guidance unit,
and lateral control guidance unit for
play. If any bearing is loose, the
proposed AD would require replacing
the affected bearing with an airworthy
bearing.
Differences between this Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
Differences between this proposed AD
and the EASA AD are:
• The EASA AD is applicable to the
EC 635 helicopter, whereas this
proposed AD is not because the EC 635
helicopter is not type certificated in the
U.S.
• The EASA AD requires an initial
inspection within 50 flight hours or one
month, whichever occurs first after May
31, 2008, and a modification within the
next 12 months. This proposed AD
would require the modification within
100 hours TIS or at the next annual
inspection, whichever occurs first, and
no inspection until after the
modification has been accomplished.
• The EASA AD provides
requirements for certain spare parts,
whereas this proposed AD does not.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 175 Model EC135 and 112
Model MBB–BK 117 C–2 helicopters of
U.S. Registry and that labor costs
average $85 per work-hour. Based on
these estimates, we would expect the
following costs:
• For EC135 helicopters, it would
take about 32 work-hours to perform the
modification. Parts would cost about
$312. The total cost for the modification
would be about $3,032 per helicopter
and $530,600 for the U.S. operator fleet.
The repetitive inspections would
require 6.5 work-hours for a cost of
about $553 per helicopter and about
$96,775 for the fleet per inspection
cycle.
• For MBB–BK 117 C–2 helicopters, it
would take about 32 work-hours to
perform the modification. Parts would
cost about $396. The total cost for the
modification would be $3,116 per
helicopter and $348,992 for the U.S.
operator fleet. The cost for the repetitive
inspections thereafter would be about
$85 per helicopter and $9,520 for the
fleet per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by Reference,
Safety.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH: Docket No.
FAA–2013–0555; Directorate Identifier
2010–SW–047–AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to the following
helicopters, certificated in any category:
(1) Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD)
Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+
helicopters, serial number (S/N) 0005
through 00829, with a tail rotor control lever,
part number (P/N) L672M2802205 or
L672M1012212; cyclic control lever, P/N
L671M1005250; collective control lever
assembly, P/N L671M2020108; or collective
control plate, P/N L671M5040207; installed;
and
(2) Model MBB–BK 117 C–2 helicopters, S/
N 9004 through 9310, with a tail rotor control
lever assembly, P/N B672M1007101 or
B672M1807101; tail rotor control lever, P/N
B672M1002202 or L672M2802205; or lateral
control lever assembly, P/N B670M1008101,
installed.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
incorrectly installed flight control bearings.
This condition could cause the affected
control lever to shift and contact the
helicopter structure, resulting in reduced
control of the helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by September
3, 2013.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) For Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2,
and T2+ helicopters:
(i) Within the next 100 hours time-inservice (TIS) or at the next annual inspection,
whichever occurs, modify the left-hand (LH)
and right-hand (RH) guidance units and the
cyclic shaft by installing bushings and
washers to prevent shifting of the bearings in
the axial direction as follows:
(A) Remove and disassemble the LH
guidance unit and install a bushing, P/N
L672M1012260, between the bearing block
and the lever of the LH guidance unit as
depicted in Detail A of Figure 5 of Eurocopter
Alert Service Bulletin EC135–67A–019,
Revision 3, dated December 16, 2009 (EC135
ASB).
(B) For helicopters without a yaw brake,
remove and disassemble the RH guidance
unit and install a bushing, P/N
L672M1012260, between the bearing block
and the lever as depicted in Detail B of
Figure 5 of EC135 ASB.
(C) Remove and disassemble the cyclic
shaft and install a washer, P/N
L671M1005260, between the bearing block
and the lever as depicted in Detail C of
Figure 6 of EC135 ASB.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40049
(D) Remove the collective control rod from
the bellcrank and install a washer, P/N
L221M1042208, on each side of the collective
control rod and bellcrank as depicted in
Detail D of Figure 6 of EC135 ASB.
(E) At intervals not to exceed 800 hours
TIS or 36 months, whichever occurs first,
inspect the bearings in the LH guidance unit,
RH guidance unit, cyclic control, upper
guidance unit, and linear voltage differential
transducer plate for play. If any bearing is
loose, replace the affected bearing with an
airworthy bearing.
(2) For Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
helicopters:
(i) Within the next 100 hours TIS or at the
next annual inspection, whichever occurs
first, modify the LH and RH guidance units
and the lateral control lever by installing
bushings and washers to prevent shifting of
the bearings in the axial direction as follows:
(A) Remove and disassemble the RH
guidance unit and install a bushing, P/N
L672M1012260, between the lever and the
bracket as depicted in Detail B of Figure 4 of
Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin MBB
BK117 C–2–67A–010, Revision 3, dated
February 8, 2010 (BK117 ASB). Remove and
disassemble the LH guidance unit and install
a bushing, P/N L672M1012260, between the
lever and the bracket as depicted in Detail C
of Figure 4 of BK117 ASB.
(B) Remove the lateral control lever and
install new bushings in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
3.C(9)(a) through 3.C(9)(g), of BK 117 ASB.
(C) Identify the modified lever assembly by
writing ‘‘MBB BK117 C–2–67A–010’’ on the
lever with permanent marking pen and
protect with a single layer of lacquer (CM 421
or equivalent).
(D) Apply corrosion preventive paste (CM
518 or equivalent) on the shank of the screws
and install airworthy parts as depicted in
Figure 5 of BK117 ASB.
(E) At intervals not to exceed 600 hours
TIS or 24 months, whichever occurs first,
inspect the bearings in the RH guidance unit,
LH guidance unit, and lateral control
guidance unit for play. If any bearing is loose,
replace the affected bearing with an
airworthy bearing.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller,
Senior Aviation Safety Engineer, Safety
Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX
76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that
you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
40050
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
No. 2010–0058, dated March 30, 2010. You
may view the EASA AD at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–
2013–0555.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6710, Main Rotor Control.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 18,
2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–15956 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0540; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–185–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to certain The Boeing
Company Model 747–100, 747–100B,
747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C,
747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–
400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP
series airplanes. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections
for wear damage and cracks of the
fuselage skin in the interface area of the
vertical stabilizer seal and fuselage skin,
a detailed inspection for wear damage
and cracks of the surface of any skin
repair doubler in the area, and
corrective actions if necessary. For
airplanes on which the fuselage skin has
been blended to remove wear damage,
the existing AD also requires repetitive
external detailed inspections or high
frequency eddy current inspections for
cracks of the blended area of the
fuselage skin, and corrective actions if
necessary. Since we issued that AD, we
have received a report of wear through
the fuselage skin that occurred sooner
than the repetitive inspection interval
specified in the existing AD. This
proposed AD would reduce the
repetitive inspection interval and
change certain corrective actions. We
are proposing this AD to detect and
correct wear damage and cracks of the
fuselage skin in the interface area of the
vertical stabilizer seal and fuselage skin
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
in sections 46 and 48, which could
cause in-flight depressurization of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–
65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; phone:
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–
766–5680; Internet: https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6432; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: Bill.Ashforth@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2013–0540; Directorate Identifier
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2012–NM–185–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On June 19, 2009, we issued AD
2009–14–02, Amendment 39–15951 (74
FR 30919, June 29, 2009), on the
products listed above, which
superseded AD 2002–26–15,
Amendment 39–13003 (68 FR 476,
January 6, 2003). AD 2009–14–02
requires repetitive inspections for wear
damage and cracks of the fuselage skin
in the interface area of the vertical
stabilizer seal and fuselage skin, a
detailed inspection for wear damage and
cracks of the surface of any skin repair
doubler in the area, and corrective
actions if necessary. For airplanes on
which the fuselage skin has been
blended to remove wear damage, AD
2009–14–02 also requires repetitive
external detailed inspections or high
frequency eddy current inspections for
cracks of the blended area of the
fuselage skin, and corrective actions if
necessary. AD 2009–14–02 resulted
from reports of skin wear damage on
airplanes with fewer than 8,000 total
flight cycles. Additionally, there were
three reports of skin wear damage on
airplanes on which Boeing Material
Specifications (BMS) 10–86 Teflonfilled coating was applied (terminating
action per AD 2002–26–15). We issued
AD 2009–14–02 to detect and correct
wear damage and cracks of the fuselage
skin in the interface area of the vertical
stabilizer seal and fuselage skin in
sections 46 and 48, which could cause
in-flight depressurization of the
airplane.
Actions Since Existing AD 2009–14–02,
Amendment 39–15951 (74 FR 30919,
June 29, 2009) Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2009–14–02,
Amendment 39–15951 (74 FR 30919,
June 29, 2009), we have received a
report of wear through the fuselage skin
between body station (STA) 2598 and
STA 2638, stringers S–2L to S–3L. The
wear developed in less than 3,657 flight
hours since the previous inspection,
which was less than the repetitive
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40047-40050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15956]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0555; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-047-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) Model EC135 and MBB-BK 117 C-2
helicopters. This proposed AD is prompted by the discovery during a
routine inspection of loose flight control bearings because of
incorrect installation. This proposed AD would require inspecting the
flight-control bearings repetitively, replacing any loose bearing with
an airworthy flight-control bearing, and installing bushings and
washers. The proposed actions are intended to prevent the affected
control lever from shifting, contacting the helicopter structure, and
reducing control of the helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 3,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone (972) 641-0000 or (800) 232-0323; fax (972) 641-3775;
or at https://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, TX 76137.
[[Page 40048]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to
the economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that might
result from adopting the proposals in this document. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as
a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued AD No.
2010-0058, dated March 30, 2010, (AD 2010-0058), to correct an unsafe
condition for the ECD Model MBB-BK 117 C-2, EC 135 and EC 635
helicopters. EASA advises that during an inspection of an MBB-BK 117 C-
2, ``bearings were detected which had not been correctly fixed.'' As
some bearings on the EC 135 and MBB-BK 117 C-2 type designs are
installed with the same procedure, they are equally affected by the
possibility of the unsafe condition. EASA states that this condition,
if not corrected, could result in the affected control lever shifting
in the axial direction, contacting the helicopter structure, and
subsequently reducing control of the helicopter.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
the Federal Republic of Germany and are approved for operation in the
United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with Germany, EASA,
its technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition
described in its AD. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
known relevant information and determined that an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) MBB BK117 C-2-
67A-010, Revision 3, dated February 8, 2010, and ASB EC135-67A-019,
Revision 3, dated December 16, 2009. These ASBs specify:
Within the next 50 flight hours (FHs), inspecting the
affected bearings and, if necessary, rebonding any affected bearings or
replacing the lever assembly.
Within 12 months, retrofitting bushings on the levers to
prevent movement of the bearings.
After the retrofit, repeating the inspection every 800 FHs
or 36 months for the Model EC 135 helicopters, whichever comes first,
and 600 FHs or 24 months, whichever comes first, for the Model MBB-BK
117 C-2 helicopters.
EASA classified these ASBs as mandatory and issued AD 2010-0058 to
ensure the continued airworthiness of these helicopters.
Proposed AD Requirements
For EC135 helicopters, this proposed AD would require, within 100
hours time-in-service (TIS) or at the next annual inspection, whichever
occurs first, modifying the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) guidance
units and the cyclic shaft by installing bushings and washers to
prevent shifting in the axial direction. This proposed AD would require
at intervals not to exceed 800 hours TIS or 36 months, whichever occurs
first, inspecting the bearings in the LH guidance unit, the RH guidance
unit, cyclic control, upper guidance unit, and linear voltage
differential transducer plate for play. If any bearing is loose, the
proposed AD would require replacing the affected bearing with an
airworthy bearing.
For MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters, this proposed AD would require,
within 100 hours TIS or at the next annual inspection, whichever occurs
first, modifying the LH and RH guidance units and the lateral control
lever by installing bushings and washers to prevent shifting of the
bearings in the axial direction. This proposed AD also would require at
intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS or 24 months, whichever occurs
first, inspecting the bearings in the RH guidance unit, LH guidance
unit, and lateral control guidance unit for play. If any bearing is
loose, the proposed AD would require replacing the affected bearing
with an airworthy bearing.
Differences between this Proposed AD and the EASA AD
Differences between this proposed AD and the EASA AD are:
The EASA AD is applicable to the EC 635 helicopter,
whereas this proposed AD is not because the EC 635 helicopter is not
type certificated in the U.S.
The EASA AD requires an initial inspection within 50
flight hours or one month, whichever occurs first after May 31, 2008,
and a modification within the next 12 months. This proposed AD would
require the modification within 100 hours TIS or at the next annual
inspection, whichever occurs first, and no inspection until after the
modification has been accomplished.
The EASA AD provides requirements for certain spare parts,
whereas this proposed AD does not.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 175 Model EC135 and
112 Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters of U.S. Registry and that labor
costs average $85 per work-hour. Based on these estimates, we would
expect the following costs:
For EC135 helicopters, it would take about 32 work-hours
to perform the modification. Parts would cost about $312. The total
cost for the modification would be about $3,032 per helicopter and
$530,600 for the U.S. operator fleet. The repetitive inspections would
require 6.5 work-hours for a cost of about $553 per helicopter and
about $96,775 for the fleet per inspection cycle.
For MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters, it would take about 32
work-hours to perform the modification. Parts would cost about $396.
The total cost for the modification would be $3,116 per helicopter and
$348,992 for the U.S. operator fleet. The cost for the repetitive
inspections thereafter would be about $85 per helicopter and $9,520 for
the fleet per inspection cycle.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more
[[Page 40049]]
detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2013-0555; Directorate
Identifier 2010-SW-047-AD.
(a) Applicability
This AD applies to the following helicopters, certificated in
any category:
(1) Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+,
T1, T2, and T2+ helicopters, serial number (S/N) 0005 through 00829,
with a tail rotor control lever, part number (P/N) L672M2802205 or
L672M1012212; cyclic control lever, P/N L671M1005250; collective
control lever assembly, P/N L671M2020108; or collective control
plate, P/N L671M5040207; installed; and
(2) Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters, S/N 9004 through 9310,
with a tail rotor control lever assembly, P/N B672M1007101 or
B672M1807101; tail rotor control lever, P/N B672M1002202 or
L672M2802205; or lateral control lever assembly, P/N B670M1008101,
installed.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as incorrectly installed
flight control bearings. This condition could cause the affected
control lever to shift and contact the helicopter structure,
resulting in reduced control of the helicopter.
(c) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by September 3, 2013.
(d) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time.
(e) Required Actions
(1) For Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+, T1, T2, and T2+ helicopters:
(i) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) or at the
next annual inspection, whichever occurs, modify the left-hand (LH)
and right-hand (RH) guidance units and the cyclic shaft by
installing bushings and washers to prevent shifting of the bearings
in the axial direction as follows:
(A) Remove and disassemble the LH guidance unit and install a
bushing, P/N L672M1012260, between the bearing block and the lever
of the LH guidance unit as depicted in Detail A of Figure 5 of
Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin EC135-67A-019, Revision 3, dated
December 16, 2009 (EC135 ASB).
(B) For helicopters without a yaw brake, remove and disassemble
the RH guidance unit and install a bushing, P/N L672M1012260,
between the bearing block and the lever as depicted in Detail B of
Figure 5 of EC135 ASB.
(C) Remove and disassemble the cyclic shaft and install a
washer, P/N L671M1005260, between the bearing block and the lever as
depicted in Detail C of Figure 6 of EC135 ASB.
(D) Remove the collective control rod from the bellcrank and
install a washer, P/N L221M1042208, on each side of the collective
control rod and bellcrank as depicted in Detail D of Figure 6 of
EC135 ASB.
(E) At intervals not to exceed 800 hours TIS or 36 months,
whichever occurs first, inspect the bearings in the LH guidance
unit, RH guidance unit, cyclic control, upper guidance unit, and
linear voltage differential transducer plate for play. If any
bearing is loose, replace the affected bearing with an airworthy
bearing.
(2) For Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters:
(i) Within the next 100 hours TIS or at the next annual
inspection, whichever occurs first, modify the LH and RH guidance
units and the lateral control lever by installing bushings and
washers to prevent shifting of the bearings in the axial direction
as follows:
(A) Remove and disassemble the RH guidance unit and install a
bushing, P/N L672M1012260, between the lever and the bracket as
depicted in Detail B of Figure 4 of Eurocopter Alert Service
Bulletin MBB BK117 C-2-67A-010, Revision 3, dated February 8, 2010
(BK117 ASB). Remove and disassemble the LH guidance unit and install
a bushing, P/N L672M1012260, between the lever and the bracket as
depicted in Detail C of Figure 4 of BK117 ASB.
(B) Remove the lateral control lever and install new bushings in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
3.C(9)(a) through 3.C(9)(g), of BK 117 ASB.
(C) Identify the modified lever assembly by writing ``MBB BK117
C-2-67A-010'' on the lever with permanent marking pen and protect
with a single layer of lacquer (CM 421 or equivalent).
(D) Apply corrosion preventive paste (CM 518 or equivalent) on
the shank of the screws and install airworthy parts as depicted in
Figure 5 of BK117 ASB.
(E) At intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS or 24 months,
whichever occurs first, inspect the bearings in the RH guidance
unit, LH guidance unit, and lateral control guidance unit for play.
If any bearing is loose, replace the affected bearing with an
airworthy bearing.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation
Safety Engineer, Safety Management Group, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 222-
5110; email matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(g) Additional Information
The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD
[[Page 40050]]
No. 2010-0058, dated March 30, 2010. You may view the EASA AD at
https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA-2013-0555.
(h) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6710, Main Rotor
Control.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 18, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-15956 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P