Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 40060-40063 [2013-15955]
Download as PDF
40060
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0011, dated
January 15, 2013, for related information.
(2) For Airbus service information
identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33
5 61 93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. For PPG Aerospace service
information identified in this AD, contact
PPG Aerospace, 12780 San Fernando Road,
Sylmar, CA 91342; telephone 818 362 6711;
fax 818 362 0603; Internet https://
corporateportal.ppg.com/na/aerospace. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14,
2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–15947 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0468; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–147–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to certain The Boeing
Company Model 777–200 and –300
series airplanes equipped with RollsRoyce engines. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections
to detect cracks of the outer V-blades of
the thrust reverser, and corrective action
if necessary. The existing AD also
provides for optional terminating action
for the repetitive inspections. Since we
issued that AD, we have received
reports of cracked outer V-blade fittings
at the hinge beam end of Rolls-Royce
engine thrust reversers, on airplanes on
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
which the optional terminating action
was done. This proposed AD would
add, for airplanes on which the optional
terminating action is done, repetitive
inspections for cracking in the outer Vblade fittings of the hinge beam and
latch beam ends of each thrust reverser
half, and replacement of an affected
thrust reverser half if necessary. This
proposed AD would also add airplanes
to the applicability. We are proposing
this AD to prevent separation of a thrust
reverser from the airplane during
normal reverse thrust or during a
refused takeoff, which could result in
unexpected thrust asymmetry and a
possible runway excursion.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA
98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melanie Violette, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6422; fax:
425–917–6590; email:
melanie.violette@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2013–0468; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–147–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On December 14, 2006, we issued AD
2006–26–06, Amendment 39–14864 (71
FR 77586, December 27, 2006), for
certain The Boeing Company Model
777–200 and –300 series airplanes,
equipped with Rolls-Royce engines, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–78–0064, Revision
1, dated November 30, 2006. That AD
requires repetitive inspections to detect
cracks of the outer V-blades of the thrust
reverser, and corrective action if
necessary. The existing AD also
provides for optional terminating action
for the repetitive inspections. That AD
resulted from reports of cracked outer Vblades in the thrust reversers. We issued
that AD to prevent separation of a thrust
reverser from the airplane during
normal reverse thrust or during a
refused takeoff, which could result in
impact damage to other airplane areas.
If a thrust reverser separates from the
airplane during a refused takeoff, the
engine could produce forward thrust,
resulting in unexpected thrust
asymmetry and a possible runway
excursion.
Actions Since Existing AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006) Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006), we have received
reports of cracked outer V-blade fittings
at the hinge beam end of the thrust
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
40061
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
reverser due to relative movement
between the engine and the thrust
reverser during flight operation, on
airplanes on which the optional
terminating action (Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0061, dated July 6, 2006) specified in
AD 2006–26–06 had been done.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletins 777–78–
0061, Revision 1, dated August 28,
2007, and 777–78–0064, Revision 2,
dated June 14, 2012. For information on
the procedures and compliance times,
see this service information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
Docket No. FAA–2013–0468.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain
certain requirements of AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006). This proposed AD
would add new airplanes to the
applicability. This proposed AD would
also require, for airplanes on which the
optional terminating action is done,
repetitive inspections for cracking in the
outer V-blade fittings of the hinge beam
and latch beam ends of each thrust
reverser half, and replacement of an
affected thrust reverser half if necessary.
The phrase ‘‘related investigative
actions’’ might be used in this proposed
AD. ‘‘Related investigative actions’’ are
follow-on actions that: (1) Are related to
the primary actions, and (2) are actions
that further investigate the nature of any
condition found. Related investigative
actions in an AD could include, for
example, inspections.
In addition, the phrase, ‘‘corrective
actions’’ might be used in this proposed
AD. ‘‘Corrective actions’’ are actions
that correct or address any condition
found. Corrective actions in an AD
could include, for example, repairs.
We have removed the reference to
paragraph (h) of AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006) from paragraph (f)
of AD 2006–26–06 (paragraph (g) of this
proposed AD). Paragraph (h) of AD
2006–26–06 requires reporting and is
not a method of compliance for doing
applicable corrective actions as
specified in paragraph (f) of AD 2006–
26–06. We have added a reference to
paragraph (m) of this AD.
Change to Existing AD
Interim Action
This proposed AD would retain
certain requirements of AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006). Since AD 2006–26–
06 was issued, the AD format has been
revised, and certain paragraphs have
been rearranged. As a result, the
corresponding paragraph identifiers
have changed in this proposed AD, as
listed in the following table:
REVISED PARAGRAPH IDENTIFIERS
Requirement in AD 2006–
26–06, amendment 39–
14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006)
paragraph (f) ......................
paragraph (g) .....................
Corresponding
requirement in
this proposed
AD
paragraph (g)
paragraph (h)
We consider this proposed AD
interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing a modification that
will address the unsafe condition
identified in this AD. Once this
modification is developed, approved,
and available, we might consider
additional rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 55 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S. operators
Inspections [retained actions from existing AD
2006–26–06, Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR
77586, December 27, 2006)].
Repetitive inspections outer V-blade [new proposed action].
16 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,360 per
inspection cycle.
$1,360 per inspection
cycle.
$74,800 per inspection
cycle.
82 work-hours × $85 per hour = $6,970 per
inspection cycle.
$6,970 per inspection
cycle.
$383,350 per inspection cycle.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for this Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
40062
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2006–26–06, Amendment 39–14864 (71
FR 77586, December 27, 2006), and
adding the following new AD:
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2013–0468; Directorate Identifier 2012–
NM–147–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by August 19, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 and –300 series airplanes,
certificated in any category, equipped with
Rolls-Royce engines, as identified in Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 78, Engine exhaust.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracked outer V-blade fittings at the hinge
beam end of Rolls-Royce engine thrust
reversers. We are issuing this AD to prevent
separation of a thrust reverser from the
airplane during normal reverse thrust or
during a refused takeoff, which could result
in unexpected thrust asymmetry and a
possible runway excursion.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Retained Repetitive Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (f) of AD 2006–26–06, Amendment
39–14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006),
with new service information. For Group 1,
Configuration 1, airplanes as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777–78–0064, Revision 2, dated June 14,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
2012: Do the detailed inspections to detect
cracks in the outer V-blade of the thrust
reversers. Do the inspections in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777–78–0064, Revision 1, dated November
30, 2006; or Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012.
Do the inspections at the applicable times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance’’ of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777–78–0064, Revision 1, dated November
30, 2006; except where Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–0064,
Revision 1, dated November 30, 2006,
specifies an initial compliance time after the
date on the service bulletin, this AD requires
compliance within the specified time after
January 11, 2007 (the effective date of AD
2006–26–06). Do applicable corrective
actions before further flight, in accordance
with Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777–78–0064, Revision 1, dated
November 30, 2006; or Revision 2, dated June
14, 2012; or paragraph (m) of this AD. As of
the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012, to
accomplish the actions required by this
paragraph.
(h) Retained Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph restates the credit for
previous actions specified in paragraph (g) of
AD 2006–26–06, Amendment 39–14864 (71
FR 77586, December 27, 2006). For Group 1,
Configuration 1, airplanes as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777–78–0064, Revision 2, dated June 14,
2012: Actions done before January 11, 2007
(the effective date of AD 2006–26–06), in
accordance with Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–78–0064, dated August
7, 2006, are acceptable for compliance with
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(i) Retained Optional Terminating Action for
Paragraph (g) of this AD with New
Requirements
This paragraph restates the optional
terminating action specified in paragraph (i)
of AD 2006–26–06, Amendment 39–14864
(71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006), with new
service information. Accomplishment of the
actions specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2)
of this AD terminates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD. For airplanes on
which this terminating action has been
accomplished, operators must do the
inspection required by paragraph (j) of this
AD.
(1) Accomplishment of the applicable
inspections and related investigative/
corrective actions before the effective date of
this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0061, dated July 6, 2006; except, where
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777–78–0061, dated July 6, 2006, specifies to
contact the manufacturer for appropriate
action, repair before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this
AD.
(2) Accomplishment of the applicable
modification, inspections, and related
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
investigative/corrective actions, in
accordance with Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–78–0061, Revision 1,
dated August 28, 2007; except, where Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0061, Revision 1, dated August 28, 2007,
specifies to contact the manufacturer for
appropriate action, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (m) of
this AD.
(j) New Repetitive Inspections
For Group 1, Configuration 2, airplanes,
and Groups 2 and 3 airplanes, as identified
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777–78–0064, Revision 2, dated June 14,
2012: At the applicable times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012, except
as provided by paragraph (k) of this AD, do
a detailed inspection for cracking of the outer
V-blade fittings at the latch beam end and
hinge beam end of each thrust reverser half,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–78–0064, Revision 2,
dated June 14, 2012.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the
inspections thereafter at the times specified
in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–
0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012.
(2) If any cracking is found, before further
flight, replace the affected thrust reverser half
with a serviceable thrust reverser half, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–78–0064, Revision 2,
dated June 14, 2012. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at the times specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance’’ of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–78–0064,
Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012.
(k) Service Information Exception
Where Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777–78–0064, Revision 2, dated June
14, 2012, specifies an initial compliance time
‘‘after the date of Revision 2 of this service
bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance
within the specified time after the effective
date of this AD.
(l) Reporting
Although Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777–78–0064, Revision 2, dated June
14, 2012, specifies to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
to make those findings. For a repair method
to be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2006–26–06,
Amendment 39–14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006), are not approved as
AMOCs for this AD.
(n) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Melanie Violette, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,
FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6422; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: melanie.violette@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14,
2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–15955 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0556; Directorate
Identifier 2007–SW–30–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Airworthiness Directives; Erickson AirCrane Incorporated Helicopters (Type
Certificate previously Held by Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede an
existing airworthiness directive (AD) for
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky)
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
Model S–64E helicopters. The existing
AD requires checks of the main rotor
blades for a crack. This proposed AD
would retain the actions of the existing
AD, would reflect that the type
certificate (TC) for this model helicopter
has been transferred to Erickson AirCrane Incorporated (Erickson), and
expand the applicability to include the
similar Erickson Model S–64F
helicopters. This proposed AD is
prompted by a need to expand the
applicability to include Model S–64F
helicopters and clarify the applicable
main rotor blades by part number. The
proposed actions are intended to detect
a crack in the main rotor blade and
prevent blade separation and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by September 3, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
Docket Operations Office between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
economic evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Erickson AirCrane Incorporated, ATTN: Chris
Erickson/Compliance Officer, 3100
Willow Springs Rd., PO Box 3247,
Central Point, OR 97502; telephone
(541) 664–5544; fax (541) 664–2312;
email cerickson@ericksonaircrane.com.
You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort
Worth, Texas 76137.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40063
JC
Lin, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft
Certification Office, Rotorcraft
Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd.,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222–5170; email 7-AVS-ASW170@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. To ensure the docket
does not contain duplicate comments,
commenters should send only one copy
of written comments, or if comments are
filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
We will file in the docket all
comments that we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
Before acting on this proposal, we will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
We will consider comments filed after
the comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this
proposal in light of the comments we
receive.
Discussion
On December 6, 1990, we issued AD
90–26–12, Amendment 39–6841 (55 FR
51406, December 14, 1990) for Sikorsky
Model S–64E helicopters. The AD
requires repetitive checks of the Blade
Inspection Method (BIM) indicator of
each main rotor blade to determine
whether the blade pressure has been
compromised by a blade crack. These
checks, which may be performed by the
pilot, must be accomplished and
recorded before the first flight of each
day and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed three hours time-in-service (TIS)
for helicopters engaged in seven or more
external lifts per hour or five hours TIS
for operations with less than seven
external lifts per hour or operations
without an external load, with each
check-interval measured from the last
check. Those actions are intended to
detect fatigue cracks in the blade, which
could result in separation of the blade
and loss of control of the helicopter.
E:\FR\FM\03JYP1.SGM
03JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40060-40063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15955]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0468; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-147-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300
series airplanes equipped with Rolls-Royce engines. The existing AD
currently requires repetitive inspections to detect cracks of the outer
V-blades of the thrust reverser, and corrective action if necessary.
The existing AD also provides for optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. Since we issued that AD, we have received
reports of cracked outer V-blade fittings at the hinge beam end of
Rolls-Royce engine thrust reversers, on airplanes on which the optional
terminating action was done. This proposed AD would add, for airplanes
on which the optional terminating action is done, repetitive
inspections for cracking in the outer V-blade fittings of the hinge
beam and latch beam ends of each thrust reverser half, and replacement
of an affected thrust reverser half if necessary. This proposed AD
would also add airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing this AD
to prevent separation of a thrust reverser from the airplane during
normal reverse thrust or during a refused takeoff, which could result
in unexpected thrust asymmetry and a possible runway excursion.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-
65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000, extension 1; fax
206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melanie Violette, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6422; fax:
425-917-6590; email: melanie.violette@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0468;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-147-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On December 14, 2006, we issued AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864
(71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006), for certain The Boeing Company Model
777-200 and -300 series airplanes, equipped with Rolls-Royce engines,
as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064,
Revision 1, dated November 30, 2006. That AD requires repetitive
inspections to detect cracks of the outer V-blades of the thrust
reverser, and corrective action if necessary. The existing AD also
provides for optional terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. That AD resulted from reports of cracked outer V-blades in
the thrust reversers. We issued that AD to prevent separation of a
thrust reverser from the airplane during normal reverse thrust or
during a refused takeoff, which could result in impact damage to other
airplane areas. If a thrust reverser separates from the airplane during
a refused takeoff, the engine could produce forward thrust, resulting
in unexpected thrust asymmetry and a possible runway excursion.
Actions Since Existing AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006) Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586,
December 27, 2006), we have received reports of cracked outer V-blade
fittings at the hinge beam end of the thrust
[[Page 40061]]
reverser due to relative movement between the engine and the thrust
reverser during flight operation, on airplanes on which the optional
terminating action (Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-
0061, dated July 6, 2006) specified in AD 2006-26-06 had been done.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletins 777-78-0061,
Revision 1, dated August 28, 2007, and 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated
June 14, 2012. For information on the procedures and compliance times,
see this service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for Docket No. FAA-2013-0468.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain certain requirements of AD 2006-26-
06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006). This proposed
AD would add new airplanes to the applicability. This proposed AD would
also require, for airplanes on which the optional terminating action is
done, repetitive inspections for cracking in the outer V-blade fittings
of the hinge beam and latch beam ends of each thrust reverser half, and
replacement of an affected thrust reverser half if necessary.
The phrase ``related investigative actions'' might be used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that: (1) Are related to the primary actions, and (2) are actions that
further investigate the nature of any condition found. Related
investigative actions in an AD could include, for example, inspections.
In addition, the phrase, ``corrective actions'' might be used in
this proposed AD. ``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or
address any condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include,
for example, repairs.
Change to Existing AD
This proposed AD would retain certain requirements of AD 2006-26-
06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006). Since AD 2006-
26-06 was issued, the AD format has been revised, and certain
paragraphs have been rearranged. As a result, the corresponding
paragraph identifiers have changed in this proposed AD, as listed in
the following table:
Revised Paragraph Identifiers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirement in AD 2006-26-06, amendment
39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, Corresponding requirement in
2006) this proposed AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
paragraph (f).......................... paragraph (g)
paragraph (g).......................... paragraph (h)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have removed the reference to paragraph (h) of AD 2006-26-06,
Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006) from paragraph (f)
of AD 2006-26-06 (paragraph (g) of this proposed AD). Paragraph (h) of
AD 2006-26-06 requires reporting and is not a method of compliance for
doing applicable corrective actions as specified in paragraph (f) of AD
2006-26-06. We have added a reference to paragraph (m) of this AD.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing a modification that will address the unsafe
condition identified in this AD. Once this modification is developed,
approved, and available, we might consider additional rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 55 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections [retained actions from 16 work-hours x $85 per $1,360 per inspection $74,800 per inspection
existing AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39- hour = $1,360 per cycle. cycle.
14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, inspection cycle.
2006)].
Repetitive inspections outer 82 work-hours x $85 per $6,970 per inspection $383,350 per inspection
V[dash]blade [new proposed action]. hour = $6,970 per cycle. cycle.
inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for this Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
[[Page 40062]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006), and
adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2013-0468; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-147-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by August 19,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR
77586, December 27, 2006).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300
series airplanes, certificated in any category, equipped with Rolls-
Royce engines, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 78, Engine exhaust.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracked outer V-blade
fittings at the hinge beam end of Rolls-Royce engine thrust
reversers. We are issuing this AD to prevent separation of a thrust
reverser from the airplane during normal reverse thrust or during a
refused takeoff, which could result in unexpected thrust asymmetry
and a possible runway excursion.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Repetitive Inspections
This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD
2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006),
with new service information. For Group 1, Configuration 1,
airplanes as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012: Do the detailed
inspections to detect cracks in the outer V-blade of the thrust
reversers. Do the inspections in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-
0064, Revision 1, dated November 30, 2006; or Revision 2, dated June
14, 2012. Do the inspections at the applicable times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance'' of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 1, dated November 30, 2006; except
where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064,
Revision 1, dated November 30, 2006, specifies an initial compliance
time after the date on the service bulletin, this AD requires
compliance within the specified time after January 11, 2007 (the
effective date of AD 2006-26-06). Do applicable corrective actions
before further flight, in accordance with Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 1, dated November 30, 2006;
or Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012; or paragraph (m) of this AD. As
of the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012, to
accomplish the actions required by this paragraph.
(h) Retained Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph restates the credit for previous actions
specified in paragraph (g) of AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71
FR 77586, December 27, 2006). For Group 1, Configuration 1,
airplanes as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012: Actions done before
January 11, 2007 (the effective date of AD 2006-26-06), in
accordance with Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-
0064, dated August 7, 2006, are acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(i) Retained Optional Terminating Action for Paragraph (g) of this AD
with New Requirements
This paragraph restates the optional terminating action
specified in paragraph (i) of AD 2006-26-06, Amendment 39-14864 (71
FR 77586, December 27, 2006), with new service information.
Accomplishment of the actions specified in paragraph (i)(1) or
(i)(2) of this AD terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of
this AD. For airplanes on which this terminating action has been
accomplished, operators must do the inspection required by paragraph
(j) of this AD.
(1) Accomplishment of the applicable inspections and related
investigative/corrective actions before the effective date of this
AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0061, dated July 6, 2006;
except, where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0061,
dated July 6, 2006, specifies to contact the manufacturer for
appropriate action, repair before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(m) of this AD.
(2) Accomplishment of the applicable modification, inspections,
and related investigative/corrective actions, in accordance with
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0061, Revision 1,
dated August 28, 2007; except, where Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777-78-0061, Revision 1, dated August 28, 2007,
specifies to contact the manufacturer for appropriate action, repair
before further flight using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this AD.
(j) New Repetitive Inspections
For Group 1, Configuration 2, airplanes, and Groups 2 and 3
airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012: At the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance'' of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2,
dated June 14, 2012, except as provided by paragraph (k) of this AD,
do a detailed inspection for cracking of the outer V-blade fittings
at the latch beam end and hinge beam end of each thrust reverser
half, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated
June 14, 2012.
(1) If no cracking is found, repeat the inspections thereafter
at the times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance'' of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated
June 14, 2012.
(2) If any cracking is found, before further flight, replace the
affected thrust reverser half with a serviceable thrust reverser
half, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated
June 14, 2012. Repeat the inspections thereafter at the times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance'' of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064, Revision 2, dated June 14,
2012.
(k) Service Information Exception
Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064,
Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012, specifies an initial compliance
time ``after the date of Revision 2 of this service bulletin,'' this
AD requires compliance within the specified time after the effective
date of this AD.
(l) Reporting
Although Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-78-0064,
Revision 2, dated June 14, 2012, specifies to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
[[Page 40063]]
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2006-26-06,
Amendment 39-14864 (71 FR 77586, December 27, 2006), are not
approved as AMOCs for this AD.
(n) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Melanie
Violette, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6422; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
melanie.violette@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 14, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-15955 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P