Method for the Determination of Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter, 40000-40011 [2013-15880]
Download as PDF
40000
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
[FR Doc. 2013–16043 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
RIN 1625–AA00
■
2. Add § 165.T09–0547 to read as
follows:
■
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. All waters of the Grand
River within the arc of a circle with an
800 foot radius with a center in position
43° 3′ 55.7″ N and 86° 14′ 13.8″ W (NAD
83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This rule is effective and will be
enforced from 9:30 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
on July 4, 2013.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative.
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
Eighth Coast Guard District Annual
Safety Zones; Riverfront Independence
Festival Fireworks; Ohio River 607.0–
609.0; New Albany, KY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
§ 165.T09–0547 Safety Zone; Grand Haven
4th of July fireworks; Grand River, Grand
Haven, MI.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0331]
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a Safety Zone for the Riverfront
Independence Festival Fireworks on the
Ohio River 607.0 to 609.0 from 9:30
p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2013.
This action is necessary for the
safeguard of participants and spectators,
including all crews, vessels, and
persons on navigable waters during the
Riverfront Independence Festival
Fireworks. During the enforcement
period, in accordance with a previously
established Safety Zone, entry into,
transiting through or anchoring in the
Safety Zone is prohibited to all vessels
not registered with the sponsor as
participants or official patrol vessels,
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) Ohio Valley
or a designated representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.801 will be enforced from 9:30 p.m.
until 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice of
enforcement, call Petty Officer Second
Class Catherine M. Lawson, Coast Guard
Sector Ohio Valley at 502–779–5432, or
by email at
Catherine.M.Lawson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Safety Zone for
the annual Riverfront Independence
Festival Fireworks listed in 33 CFR
165.801 Table 1, Table No. 18; Sector
Ohio Valley, No. 21 on July 3, 2013 from
9:30 p.m. until 10:30 p.m.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.801, entry into the Safety Zone
listed in Table 1, Table No. 18; Sector
Ohio Valley, No. 21 is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
a designated representative. Persons or
vessels desiring to enter into or pass
through the Safety Zone must request
permission from the Captain of the Port
or a designated representative. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port or
designated representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295,
116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1. In
addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with advance
notification of this enforcement period
via Local Notice to Mariners and Marine
Information Broadcasts.
If the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
or Patrol Commander determines that
the Safety Zone need not be enforced for
the full duration stated in this notice of
enforcement, he or she may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant
general permission to enter the
regulated area.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
L.W. Hewett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2013–16046 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 50
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0210; FRL–9822–1]
RIN 2060–AP89
Method for the Determination of Lead
in Total Suspended Particulate Matter
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is establishing a new
Federal Reference Method (FRM) for
measuring Lead (Pb) in total suspended
particulate matter (TSP) collected from
ambient air. This method is intended for
use by analytical laboratories
performing the analysis of Pb in TSP to
support data collection for the Pb
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). The existing FRM for Pb is
designated as a new Federal Equivalent
Method (FEM), and the currently
designated FEMs are retained. This
action avoids any disruption to existing
Pb monitoring networks and data
collection and does not affect the FRM
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
for TSP sample collection (High-Volume
Method).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0210. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically at
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC. The Air Docket
and the Public Reading Room are open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566–1742. For additional
information about EPA’s public docket
visit the EPA Docket Center homepage
at: https://www.epa.gov/epahome/
dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Joann Rice, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division, Ambient Air
Monitoring Group (C304–06), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
3372; fax number: (919) 541–1903;
email address: rice.joann@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Purpose of the New Reference Method
B. Rationale for Selection of the New
Reference Method
C. Comments on the Proposed Rule
D. Conclusions
II. Summary of Method
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
A. Purpose of the New Reference
Method
On November 12, 2008, the EPA
substantially strengthened the NAAQS
for Pb (73 FR 66964). The EPA revised
the level of the primary (health-based)
standard from 1.5 micrograms per cubic
meter (mg/m3) of Pb to 0.15 mg/m3 of Pb
measured in TSP and revised the
secondary (welfare-based) standard to
be identical in all respects to the
primary standard. The current Pb in
TSP FRM is based on Flame Atomic
Absorption Spectroscopy (FAAS) as
specified in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix
G. The FRM in Appendix G was
originally promulgated in 1978 when
FAAS was widely used and considered
the best available method to support Pb
NAAQS data collection at a level of 1.5
mg/m3. A new Pb in TSP FRM is needed
to: (1) Take advantage of improved
extraction methods that are now
available with improved precision,
sample throughput, and extraction
efficiency; (2) address advances in
measurement technology that have
occurred since promulgation of the
original FRM; and (3) address the
improved measurement sensitivity
(detection limits) needed in response to
the tightened Pb NAAQS.
The reference method for Pb in TSP
includes two parts: the analysis method
for Pb in TSP as specified in 40 CFR 50,
Appendix G, and the reference method
for high-volume sampling of TSP as
specified in 40 CFR 50, Appendix B.
The new FRM is for the analysis of Pb
in TSP based on Inductively Coupled
Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS).
The FRM serves as the definitive
method for routinely analyzing Pb for
comparison to the NAAQS and also
serves as the standard of comparison for
determining equivalence of candidate
FEMs. This method replaces the existing
method in 40 CFR 50, Appendix G. The
FRM that was promulgated in 1978 as
Appendix G becomes an approved FEM
and the currently designated FEMs are
retained. The EPA believes this is
appropriate because the new FRM is
based on two methods that were tested
and approved as FEMs (EQL–0510–191
and EQL–0710–192) to ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40001
comparability with the FAAS method.
This approach permits continued use of
the legacy FRM (as an FEM) and the
existing FEMs. This avoids any
disruption to state and local air
monitoring agencies using these
methods for Pb monitoring. The
reference method for high volume
sampling of TSP will continue to be
performed in accordance with the FRM
described in Appendix B, and,
therefore, is not included as part of this
FRM.
With the tightened NAAQS in 2008
and the need for increased measurement
sensitivity, an improved measurement
technology has become available to
meet the needs of the current NAAQS.
The FAAS method is less frequently
used in the Pb ambient monitoring
network (about 10 percent of the sites
reported Pb in TSP data to the EPA’s Air
Quality System in 2012 using the FAAS
method) and ICP-based methods have
increased in popularity. Recently, the
FAAS method has mainly been used as
the reference method for testing and
designation of candidate FEMs for Pb in
accordance with 40 CFR 53.33. With the
lowered Pb concentration testing range
in Part 53 and new requirement for a
Method Detection Limit (MDL) of
0.0075 mg/m3 (described below), the
FAAS method sensitivity and
availability of laboratories with FAAS
capability have created some challenges
for comparability testing of new FEMs.
In 2008, the EPA also revised the
performance-based requirements for Pb
FEMs in Part 53. The performance
requirements were revised to be
consistent with the revised Pb NAAQS
level. Specifically, the Pb concentration
range at which the FEM comparability
testing is conducted was lowered to a
range of 0.045 to 0.375 mg/m3 and the
requirement for a minimum method
detection limit was established at
0.0075 mg/m3. The detection limit of the
new FRM is more than adequate to meet
the reduced testing range and detection
limit requirements. The FRM’s average
detection limit for Pb-spiked filters is
estimated at 0.00009 mg/m3, which is
well below the requirement of 0.0075
mg/m3.
B. Rationale for Selection of the New
Reference Method
The FRM is based on two recently
approved FEMs for extracting Pb from
glass fiber filters for subsequent analysis
by ICP–MS: (1) Method EQL–0510–191
which uses a heated (80 ± 5°C)
ultrasonic water bath with 1.03M nitric
(HNO3)/2.23M hydrochloric (HCl) acids,
and (2) Method EQL–0710–192 which
uses a heated (95 ± 5°C) graphite block
(hot block) with 3.5 percent volume/
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
40002
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
volume (v/v) HNO3. In selecting this
methodology, the EPA’s primary
considerations were: methods that have
already been tested and approved
against the FAAS method; use of
equipment that is commonly used; a
method that is practical (use of a single
vessel for the entire extraction process
and storage); and a method with
improved sensitivity and throughput to
increase efficiency and cost
effectiveness over the legacy FRM. ICP–
MS was chosen as the analytical
technique because it has improved
sensitivity, selectivity, linear range, and
is more readily available than FAAS in
laboratories today.
The FRM uses methods from two
existing FEMs that have been proven
comparable to FAAS and, therefore,
retains consistency with the legacy FRM
(Rice, 2013). The FRM is only intended
for the analysis of Pb in TSP and allows
for the use of glass fiber, quartz, or
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters.
HNO3 alone is sufficient for the
extraction of Pb; however, the ultrasonic
extraction method includes HCl to allow
monitoring agencies some flexibility for
future needs that may include the
extraction of other metals. HCl is
needed to aid the extraction of other
metals that are not easily brought into
solution with HNO3 alone. The FRM
was evaluated for the extraction of Pb
only. If the FRM is used for metals other
than Pb, the user must evaluate the
FRM’s applicability before use. The hot
block extraction method uses only
HNO3 and must also be evaluated by the
user before use to extract metals other
than Pb.
The approach and key specifications
of the method were submitted for peer
review to the Clean Air Scientific
Advisory Committee (CASAC) Ambient
Air Monitoring and Methods
Subcommittee. Public meetings were
held to discuss the method and related
monitoring issues on September 15,
2010. Comments on the method and
approach were provided in writing in a
letter dated November 30, 2010 (EPA–
CASAC–11–002),1 forwarded by CASAC
to the Administrator.
The CASAC was supportive of the
ICP–MS analytical method and found
the approach to be appropriate with
superior sensitivity and specificity for
Pb. The CASAC recommended a
strategy, using a performance-based
FRM, to provide flexibility for use of
1 CASAC’s final report on the Approach for the
Development of a New Federal Reference Method
(FRM) for Lead in Total Suspended Particulates
(Pb–TSP) can be found at: https://yosemite.epa.gov/
sab/sabproduct.nsf/
DA39026E54BAF46E8525781D00606633/$File/
EPA-CASAC-11-002-unsigned.pdf.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
non-FRM or FEM measurement methods
and recommended that a third
extraction method (microwave) be
added to the FRM for its greater sample
throughput and potential for reduced
sample-to-sample variability. The
CASAC viewed the comprehensiveness
of the FRM test plan to be appropriate,
and recommended that the EPA
consider separating the extraction
methods from the analytical methods so
that any of the FRM extraction methods
can be used with any of the FRM
analytical measurement methods.
The federal reference and equivalence
testing method for Pb in 40 CFR 53.33
serves as the performance-based method
approach for the FEM approval process.
Candidate methods are tested using the
performance specifications of part 40
CFR part 53 for acceptance and approval
as equivalent methods. Users also have
the flexibility to test and submit
additional extraction and analysis
methods for review and approval as
equivalent methods. The EPA believes
that microwave extraction is a viable
option and is already available as an
approved FEM.2 The ultrasonic and hot
block approaches are sufficient for the
extraction of Pb and provide high
sample throughput, low consumable
costs, and lower equipment costs while
minimizing the risk of cross
contamination and sample loss. In
addition, the EPA believes that the
existing FEMs 3 currently provide a
wide variety of extraction and analytical
methods and the EPA strongly
encourages monitoring agencies to
consider adopting one of the already
approved FEMs in lieu of submitting
new FEM applications. The FRM has
two extraction methods (heated
ultrasonic and hot block) and one
analytical method (ICP–MS). The FRM
allows for the use of either of the two
extraction methods specified with the
ICP–MS analytical method. The method
also allows for the use of glass fiber,
PTFE, or quartz filter media for the
collection of Pb in TSP.
C. Comments on the Proposed Rule
On February 5, 2013, the EPA
proposed a new FRM for determination
of Pb in TSP (78 FR 8066) and solicited
comment on the proposed method. The
EPA received one public comment by
the close of the public comment period
on March 7, 2013. The commenter
questioned the meaning of the MDLs
estimated from the analysis of blanks.
The commenter recommended that an
2 FEM EQL–0400–0140 (65 FR 26603, May 8,
2000).
3 The list of current FEMs is located at: https://
epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/criteria/referenceequivalent-methods-list.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
MDL estimated from blanks include the
mean of the blanks and be consistent
with the Report of the Federal Advisory
Committee on Detection and
Quantitation (FACDQ) Approaches and
Uses in Clean Water Act Programs
(FACDQ, 2007). The Federal Advisory
Committee recommended that EPA
adopt a new procedure for estimated
method sensitivity and replace 40 CFR
136, Appendix B (Definition and
Procedure for the Determination of the
Method Detection Limit) with the new
procedure. The FACDQ procedure
described an approach for calculating
MDLs and quantitation limits. The EPA
conducted a pilot study to assess
whether the procedure recommended by
the FACDQ could generate reliable
estimates of the lowest concentration at
which measurement quality objectives
could be achieved (U.S. EPA, 2011).
Based on the pilot study results, the
EPA concluded that none of the
procedures tested consistently generated
accurate estimates of the lowest
concentration at which the study
measurement quality objectives were
achieved. The EPA believes that more
development and testing of the FACDQ
procedure are warranted.4 Accordingly,
based on the currently available
information, the EPA believes that the
procedures identified in 40 CFR 135,
Appendix B are a more appropriate
basis for estimating MDLs for the FRM.
The EPA provided estimates in the
proposed rule for MDLs based on
reagent/filter blanks and reagent/filter
blanks spiked with a Pb solution. The
EPA estimated MDLs based on 40 CFR
136, Appendix B which recommends
that MDLs be determined using a
concentration value that is between 1
and 5 times the estimated MDL.
However, 40 CFR 136, Appendix B does
not specify the use of reagent/filter
blanks for estimating the detection limit.
The estimate of MDLs based on reagent/
filter blanks is not consistent with 40
CFR 136, Appendix B; therefore, the
MDL estimates from reagent/filter
blanks have been removed. The
remaining MDL estimates in Tables 1, 3,
and 5 were determined using reagent/
filter blanks that were spiked with Pb at
three times the estimated detection limit
of 0.001 mg/mL. The MDLs were
estimated to demonstrate method
performance that is more than adequate
to meet the MDL requirements of 0.0075
mg/m3 for Pb in TSP. It is recommended
that laboratories performing this method
initially estimate MDLs in accordance
with 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B and
4 Refer to: https://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/
cwa/det/index.cfm for EPA’s Procedures for
Detection and Quantitation.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
D. Conclusions
After consideration of the public
comment on the estimate of MDL from
reagent/filter blanks, the EPA has
concluded that the rule should be
consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR
Part 136, Appendix B. Accordingly, any
language referring to the estimate of
MDLs using reagent/filter blanks and
the MDLs estimated from reagent/filter
blanks in Tables 1, 3, and 5 have been
removed. The MDLs estimated from the
Pb-spiked reagent/filter blanks remain
and demonstrate that the method has
more than adequate sensitivity to
support the Pb-TSP MDL requirement of
0.0075 mg/m3. No other comments were
received nor revisions made to the
proposed rule. The rule is otherwise
finalized as proposed.
II. Summary of Method
The FRM uses the ambient air sample
collection procedures of the highvolume TSP method (40 CFR Part 50,
Appendix B) and the analytical
procedure for the measurement of Pb
based on ICP–MS. Two extraction
methods are used: One using heated
ultrasonic and one using hot block
digestion. The extraction methods and
ICP–MS analysis method have been
tested and found acceptable for
extraction of Pb from glass fiber, PTFE,
or quartz filter media. This method also
met the precision and bias goals for Pb
in TSP (Rice 2013). This method
replaces the previous FRM specified in
40 CFR Part 50, Appendix G. Although
the previous FRM in Appendix G is
adequate, this method offers advantages
over the previous FRM by providing
improved sensitivity or detection limits,
precision, sample throughput, and
extraction efficiency.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is, therefore, not
subject to review under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This rule is
to promulgate a new FRM for Pb in TSP,
and to designate the existing FRM as an
FEM, and does not add any information
collection requirements beyond those
imposed by the existing Pb monitoring
requirements.
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
action establishes a new FRM for state
and local air monitoring agencies to use
as one of the approved methods for
measurement of Pb in TSP and to
designate the existing FRM as an FEM.
It does not create any additional
monitoring requirements or require
changes in approved monitoring
methods.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of this rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as (1) a small business
as defined by the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of this rule on small entities, I
certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not impose any additional
monitoring requirements beyond those
specified in the current regulations, nor
will it require any changes in approved
monitoring methods. As such, it will not
impose any requirements on small
entities.
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This action
establishes a new FRM for state and
local air monitoring agencies to use as
one of the approved methods for
measurement of Pb in TSP and
designates the existing FRM as an FEM.
This action does not create any new
monitoring requirements or require any
changes in approved monitoring
methods. Thus, Executive Order 13132
does not apply to this action.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
confirm the MDLs annually. In addition,
the EPA recommends that laboratories
consider performing the optional
iterative procedure in Part 136,
Appendix B to verify the reasonableness
of the initially estimated MDL and
subsequent MDL determinations.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
40003
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action contains no federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538 for state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any state, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this action
is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This rule imposes no
requirements on tribal governments.
This action establishes a new FRM for
state and local air monitoring agencies
to use as one of the approved methods
for measurement of Pb in TSP and
designates the existing FRM as an FEM.
This action does not create any new
monitoring requirements, nor require
any changes in approved monitoring
methods. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
The EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 F.R.
19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only
to those regulatory actions that concern
health or safety risks, such that the
analysis required under section 5–501 of
the EO has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
EO 13045 because it does not establish
an environmental standard intended to
mitigate health or safety risks.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
40004
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001)), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note), directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. NTTAA directs the EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This rule involves environmental
monitoring and measurement consistent
with the agency’s Performance Based
Measurement System (PBMS). The
PBMS approach is intended to be more
flexible and cost-effective for the
regulated community; it is also intended
to encourage innovation in analytical
technology and improved data quality.
Specifically, this rule establishes a new
FRM for Pb in TSP measurements. The
EPA used voluntary consensus
standards in the preparation of this
FRM. The FRM is the benchmark
against which all ambient monitoring
methods are compared. The FRM is not
a voluntary consensus standard.
The FEM equivalency criteria
contained in 40 CFR part 53 constitute
performance criteria. Therefore, the EPA
is not precluding the use of any method,
whether it constitutes a voluntary
consensus standard or not, as long as it
meets the specified performance criteria
in 40 CFR part 53 and is approved by
the EPA pursuant to those regulations.
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this rule
will not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. This action establishes a
new FRM for state and local air
monitoring agencies to use as one of the
approved methods for measurement of
Pb in TSP and designates the existing
FRM as an FEM.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective
August 2, 2013.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 50
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, and Lead.
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Bob Perciasepe,
Acting Administrator.
For reasons stated in the preamble,
title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations sets forth the following.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
PART 50—NATIONAL PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
1. The authority citation for part 50
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. Appendix G to part 50 is revised to
read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Appendix G to Part 50—Reference
Method for the Determination of Lead
in Total Suspended Particulate Matter
1.0 Scope and Applicability
Based on review of the air quality criteria
and national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS) for lead (Pb) completed in 2008,
the EPA made revisions to the primary and
secondary NAAQS for Pb to protect public
health and welfare. The EPA revised the level
from 1.5 mg/m3 to 0.15 mg/m3 while retaining
the current indicator of Pb in total suspended
particulate matter (Pb-TSP).
Pb-TSP is collected for 24 hours on a TSP
filter as described in Appendix B of part 50,
the Reference Method for the Determination
of Suspended Particulate Matter in the
Atmosphere (High-Volume Method). This
method is for the analysis of Pb from TSP
filters by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry (ICP–MS) using a heated
ultrasonic bath with nitric acid (HNO3) and
hydrochloric acid (HCl) or a heated block
(hot block) digester with HNO3 for filter
extraction.
This method is based on the EPA’s Office
of Solid Waste (SW–846) Method 6020A—
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry (U.S. EPA, 2007). Wording in
certain sections of this method is
paraphrased or taken directly from Method
6020A.
1.1 ICP–MS is applicable for the sub-mg/
mL (ppb) determination of Pb in a wide
variety of matrices. Results reported for
monitoring or compliance purposes are
calculated in mg/m3 at local conditions (LC).
This procedure describes a method for the
acid extraction of Pb in particulate matter
collected on glass fiber, quartz, or PTFE
filters and measurement of the extracted Pb
using ICP–MS.
1.2 Due to variations in the isotopic
abundance of Pb, the value for total Pb must
be based on the sum of the signal intensities
for isotopic masses, 206, 207, and 208. Most
instrument software packages are able to sum
the primary isotope signal intensities
automatically.
1.3 ICP–MS requires the use of an
internal standard. 115In (Indium), 165Ho
(Holmium), and 209Bi (Bismuth) are
recommended internal standards for the
determination of Pb.
1.4 Use of this method is restricted to use
by, or under supervision of, properly trained
and experienced laboratory personnel.
Requirements include training and
experience in inorganic sample preparation,
including acid extraction, and also
knowledge in the recognition and in the
correction of spectral, chemical and physical
interference in ICP–MS.
2.0 Summary of Method
2.1 This method describes the acid
extraction of Pb in particulate matter
collected on glass fiber, quartz, or PTFE
ambient air filters with subsequent
measurement of Pb by ICP–MS. Estimates of
the Method Detection Limit (MDL) or
sensitivity of the method are provided in
Tables 1, 3 and 5 and determined using Pbspiked filters or filter strips analyzed in
accordance with the guidance provided in 40
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
CFR 136, Appendix B—Determination and
procedures for the Determination of the
Method Detection Limit—Revision 1.1. The
analytical range of the method is 0.00024 mg/
m3 to 0.60 mg/m3, and based on the low and
high calibration curve standards and a
nominal filter sample volume of 2000 m3.
2.2 This method includes two extraction
methods. In the first method, a solution of
HNO3 and HCl is added to the filters or filter
strips in plastic digestion tubes and the tubes
are placed in a heated ultrasonic bath for one
hour to facilitate the extraction of Pb.
Following ultrasonication, the samples are
brought to a final volume of 40 mL (50 mL
for PTFE filters), vortex mixed or shaken
vigorously, and centrifuged prior to aliquots
being taken for ICP–MS analysis. In the
second method, a solution of dilute HNO3 is
added to the filter strips in plastic digestion
tubes and the tubes placed into the hot block
digester. The filter strip is completely
covered by the solution. The tubes are
covered with polypropylene watch glasses
and refluxed. After reflux, the samples are
diluted to a final volume of 50 mL with
reagent water and mixed before analysis.
2.3 Calibration standards and check
standards are prepared to matrix match the
acid composition of the samples. ICP–MS
analysis is then performed. With this
method, the samples are first aspirated and
the aerosol thus created is transported by a
flow of argon gas into the plasma torch. The
ions produced (e.g., Pb+1) in the plasma are
extracted via a differentially-pumped
vacuum interface and are separated on the
basis of their mass-to-charge ratio. The ions
are quantified by a channel electron
multiplier or a Faraday detector and the
signal collected is processed by the
instrument’s software. Interferences must be
assessed and corrected for, if present.
3.0 Definitions
Pb—Elemental or ionic lead
HNO3—Nitric acid
HCl—Hydrochloric acid
ICP–MS—Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometer
MDL—Method detection limit
RSD—Relative standard deviation
RPD—Relative percent difference
CB—Calibration Blank
CAL—Calibration Standard
ICB—Initial calibration blank
CCB—Continuing calibration blank
ICV—Initial calibration verification
CCV—Continuing calibration verification
LLCV—Lower Level Calibration Verification,
serves as the lower level ICV and lower
level CCV
RB—Reagent blank
RBS—Reagent blank spike
MSDS—Material Safety Data Sheet
NIST—National Institute of Standards and
Technology
D.I. water—Deionized water
SRM—NIST Standard Reference Material
CRM—Certified Reference Material
EPA—Environmental Protection Agency
v/v—Volume to volume ratio
4.0 Interferences
4.1 Reagents, glassware, plasticware, and
other sample processing hardware may yield
artifacts and/or interferences to sample
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
analysis. If reagent blanks, filter blanks, or
quality control blanks yield results above the
detection limit, the source of contamination
must be identified. All containers and
reagents used in the processing of the
samples must be checked for contamination
prior to sample extraction and analysis.
Reagents shall be diluted to match the final
concentration of the extracts and analyzed for
Pb. Labware shall be rinsed with dilute acid
solution and the solution analyzed. Once a
reagent or labware article (such as extraction
tubes) from a manufacturer has been
successfully screened, additional screening is
not required unless contamination is
suspected.
4.2 Isobaric elemental interferences in
ICP–MS are caused by isotopes of different
elements forming atomic ions with the same
nominal mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) as the
species of interest. There are no species
found in ambient air that will result in
isobaric interference with the three Pb
isotopes (206, 207, and 208) being measured.
Polyatomic interferences occur when two or
more elements combine to form an ion with
the same mass-to-charge ratio as the isotope
being measured. Pb is not subject to
interference from common polyatomic ions
and no correction is required.
4.3 The distribution of Pb isotopes is not
constant. The analysis of total Pb should be
based on the summation of signal intensities
for the isotopic masses 206, 207, and 208. In
most cases, the instrument software can
perform the summation automatically.
4.4 Physical interferences are associated
with the sample nebulization and transport
processes as well as with ion-transmission
efficiencies. Dissolved solids can deposit on
the nebulizer tip of a pneumatic nebulizer
and on the interface skimmers of the ICP–
MS. Nebulization and transport processes
can be affected if a matrix component causes
a change in surface tension or viscosity.
Changes in matrix composition can cause
significant signal suppression or
enhancement. These interferences are
compensated for by use of internal standards.
Sample dilution will reduce the effects of
high levels of dissolved salts, but calibration
standards must be prepared in the extraction
medium and diluted accordingly.
4.5 Memory interferences are related to
sample transport and result when there is
carryover from one sample to the next.
Sample carryover can result from sample
deposition on the sample and skimmer cones
and from incomplete rinsing of the sample
solution from the plasma torch and the spray
chamber between samples. These memory
effects are dependent upon both the analyte
being measured and sample matrix and can
be minimized through the use of suitable
rinse times.
5.0 Health and Safety Cautions
5.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity of
reagents used in this method has not been
fully established. Each chemical should be
regarded as a potential health hazard and
exposure to these compounds should be as
low as reasonably achievable. Each
laboratory is responsible for maintaining a
current file of OSHA regulations regarding
the safe handling of the chemicals specified
in this method. A reference file of material
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40005
safety data sheets (MSDSs) should be
available to all personnel involved in the
chemical analysis. Specifically, concentrated
HNO3 presents various hazards and is
moderately toxic and extremely irritating to
skin and mucus membranes. Use this reagent
in a fume hood whenever possible and if eye
or skin contact occurs, flush with large
volumes of water. Always wear safety glasses
or a shield for eye protection, protective
clothing, and observe proper mixing when
working with these reagents.
5.2 Concentrated HNO3 and HCl are
moderately toxic and extremely irritating to
the skin. Use these reagents in a fume hood,
and if eye and skin contact occurs, flush with
large volumes of water. Always wear safety
glasses or a shield for eye protection when
working with these reagents. The component
of this procedure requiring the greatest care
is HNO3. HNO3 is a strong, corrosive,
oxidizing agent that requires protection of the
eyes, skin, and clothing. Items to be worn
during use of this reagent include:
1. Safety goggles (or safety glasses with
side shields),
2. Acid resistant rubber gloves, and
3. A protective garment such as a
laboratory apron. HNO3 spilled on clothing
will destroy the fabric; contact with the skin
underneath will result in a burn.
It is also essential that an eye wash
fountain or eye wash bottle be available
during performance of this method. An eye
wash bottle has a spout that covers the eye.
If acid or any other corrosive gets into the
eye, the water in this bottle is squirted onto
the eye to wash out the harmful material. Eye
washing should be performed with large
amounts of water immediately after
exposure. Medical help should be sought
immediately after washing. If either acid, but
especially HNO3, is spilled onto the skin,
wash immediately with large amounts of
water. Medical attention is not required
unless the burn appears to be significant.
Even after washing and drying, HNO3 may
leave the skin slightly brown in color; this
will heal and fade with time.
5.3 Pb salts and Pb solutions are toxic.
Great care must be taken to ensure that
samples and standards are handled properly;
wash hands thoroughly after handling.
5.4 Care must be taken when using the
ultrasonic bath and hot block digester as they
are capable of causing mild burns. Users
should refer to the safety guidance provided
by the manufacturer of their specific
equipment.
5.5 Analytical plasma sources emit radio
frequency radiation in addition to intense
ultra violet (UV) radiation. Suitable
precautions should be taken to protect
personnel from such hazards. The
inductively coupled plasma should only be
viewed with proper eye protection from UV
emissions.
6.0 Equipment
6.1 Thermo Scientific X-Series ICP–MS or
equivalent. The system must be capable of
providing resolution better or equal to 1.0
atomic mass unit (amu) at 10 percent peak
height. The system must have a mass range
from at least 7 to 240 amu that allows for the
application of the internal standard
technique. For the measurement of Pb, an
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
40006
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
instrument with a collision or reaction cell is
not required.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
6.2
Ultrasonic Extraction Equipment
6.2.1 Heated ultrasonic bath capable of
maintaining a temperature of 80 °C; VWR
Model 750HT, 240W, or equivalent.
Ultrasonic bath must meet the following
performance criteria:
1. Cut a strip of aluminum foil almost the
width of the tank and double the depth.
2. Turn the ultrasonic bath on and lower
the foil into the bath vertically until almost
touching the bottom of the tank and hold for
10 seconds.
3. Remove the foil from the tank and
observe the distribution of perforations and
small pin prick holes. The indentations
should be fine and evenly distributed. The
even distribution of indentations indicates
the ultrasonic bath is acceptable for use.
6.2.2 Laboratory centrifuge, Beckman GS–
6, or equivalent.
6.2.3 Vortex mixer, VWR Signature
Digital Vortex Mixer, VWR Catalog No.
14005–824, or equivalent.
6.3 Hot block extraction equipment
6.3.1 Hot block digester, SCP Science
DigiPrep Model MS, No. 010–500–205 block
digester capable of maintaining a temperature
of 95 °C, or equivalent.
6.4 Materials and Supplies
• Argon gas supply, 99.99 percent purity
or better. National Welders Microbulk, or
equivalent.
• Plastic digestion tubes with threaded
caps for extraction and storage, SCP Science
DigiTUBE® Item No. 010–500–063, or
equivalent.
• Disposable polypropylene ribbed watch
glasses (for heated block extraction), SCP
Science Item No. 010–500–081, or
equivalent.
• Pipette, Rainin EDP2, 100 mL, ± 1 percent
accuracy, ≤1 percent RSD (precision), with
disposable tips, or equivalent.
• Pipette, Rainin EDP2, 1000 mL, ± 1
percent accuracy, ≤1 percent RSD (precision),
with disposable tips, or equivalent.
• Pipette, Rainin EDP2, 1–10 mL, ± 1
percent accuracy, ≤1 percent RSD (precision),
with disposable tips, or equivalent.
• Pipette, Thermo Lab Systems, 5 mL, ± 1
percent accuracy, ≤1 percent RSD (precision),
with disposable tips, or equivalent.
• Plastic tweezer, VWR Catalog No. 89026–
420, or equivalent.
• Laboratory marker.
• Ceramic knife, Kyocera LK–25, and nonmetal ruler or other suitable cutting tools for
making straight cuts for accurately measured
strips.
• Blank labels or labeling tape, VWR
Catalog No. 36425–045, or equivalent.
• Graduated cylinder, 1 L, VWR 89000–
260, or equivalent.
• Volumetric flask, Class A, 1 L, VWR
Catalog No. 89025–778, or equivalent.
• Millipore Element deionized water
system, or equivalent, capable of generating
water with a resistivity of ≥17.9 MW-cm).
• Disposable syringes, 10-mL, with 0.45
micron filters (must be Pb-free).
• Plastic or PTFE wash bottles.
• Glassware, Class A—volumetric flasks,
pipettes, and graduated cylinders.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Glass fiber, quartz, or PTFE filters from
the same filter manufacturer and lot used for
sample collection for use in the
determination of the MDL and for laboratory
blanks.
7.0 Reagents and Standards
7.1 Reagent—or trace metals-grade
chemicals must be used in all tests. Unless
otherwise indicated, it is intended that all
reagents conform to the specifications of the
Committee on Analytical Reagents of the
American Chemical Society, where such
specifications are available.
7.2 Concentrated nitric acid, 67–70
percent, SCP Science Catalog No. 250–037–
177, or equivalent.
7.3 Concentrated hydrochloric acid (for
the ultrasonic extraction method), 33–36
percent, SCP Science Catalog No. 250–037–
175, or equivalent.
7.4 Deionized water—All references to
deionized water in the method refer to
deionized water with a resistivity ≥17.9 MWcm.
7.5 Standard stock solutions may be
commercially purchased for each element or
as a multi-element mix. Internal standards
may be purchased as a mixed multi-element
solution. The manufacturer’s expiration date
and storage conditions must be adhered to.
7.5.1 Lead standard, 1000 mg/mL, NIST
traceable, commercially available with
certificate of analysis. High Purity Standards
Catalog No. 100028–1, or equivalent.
7.5.2 Indium (In) standard, 1000 mg/mL,
NIST traceable, commercially available with
certificate of analysis. High Purity Standards
Catalog No. 100024–1, or equivalent.
7.5.3 Bismuth (Bi) standard, 1000 mg/mL,
NIST traceable, commercially available with
certificate of analysis. High Purity Standards
Catalog No. 100006–1, or equivalent.
7.5.4 Holmium (Ho) standard, 1000 mg/
mL, NIST traceable, commercially available
with certificate of analysis. High Purity
Standards Catalog No. 100023–1, or
equivalent.
7.5.5 Second source lead standard, 1000
mg/mL, NIST traceable, commercially
available with certificate of analysis. Must be
from a different vendor or lot than the
standard described in 7.5.1. Inorganic
Ventures Catalog No. CGPB–1, or equivalent.
7.5.6 Standard Reference Materials, NIST
SRM 2583, 2586, 2587 or 1648, or
equivalent.5
Note: The In, Bi, and Ho internal standards
may also be purchased as 10 mg/mL
standards. Calibration standards are prepared
by diluting stock standards to the appropriate
levels in the same acid concentrations as in
the final sample volume. The typical range
for calibration standards is 0.001 to 2.00 mg/
mL. At a minimum, the curve must contain
a blank and five Pb containing calibration
standards. The calibration standards are
stored at ambient laboratory temperature.
Calibration standards must be prepared
weekly and verified against a freshly
prepared ICV using a NIST-traceable source
different from the calibration standards.
7.6 Internal standards may be added to
the test solution or by on-line addition. The
5 Certificates of Analysis for these SRMs can be
found at: https://www.nist.gov/srm/index.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
nominal concentration for an internal
standard is 0.010 mg/mL (10 ppb). Bismuth
(Bi) or holmium (Ho) are the preferred
internal standards for Pb, but indium (In)
may be used in the event the sample contains
Bi and high recoveries are observed.
7.7 Three laboratory blank solutions are
required for analysis: (1) The calibration
blank is used in the construction of the
calibration curve and as a periodic check of
system cleanliness (ICB and CCB); (2) the
reagent blank (RB) is carried through the
extraction process to assess possible
contamination; and (3) the rinse blank is run
between samples to clean the sample
introduction system. If RBs or laboratory
blanks yield results above the detection limit,
the source of contamination must be
identified. Screening of labware and reagents
is addressed in Section 4.1.
7.7.1 The calibration blank is prepared in
the same acid matrix as the calibration
standards and samples and contains all
internal standards used in the analysis.
7.7.2 The RB contains all reagents used in
the extraction and is carried through the
extraction procedure at the same time as the
samples.
7.7.3 The rinse blank is a solution of 1 to
2 percent HNO3 (v/v) in reagent grade water.
A sufficient volume should be prepared to
flush the system between all standards and
samples analyzed.
7.7.4 The EPA currently provides glass
fiber, quartz, and PTFE filters to air
monitoring agencies as requested annually.
As part of the procurement process, these
filters are tested for acceptance by the EPA.
The current acceptance criteria for glass fiber
and quartz filters is 15 mg per filter or 0.0075
mg/m3 using a nominal sample volume of
2000 m3 and 4.8 ng/cm2 or 0.0024 mg/m3 for
PTFE filters using a nominal sample volume
of 24 m3. Acceptance test results for filters
obtained by the EPA are typically well below
the criterion specified and also below the
recently revised Pb method performance
detection limit of 0.0075 mg/m3; therefore,
blank subtraction should not be performed.
7.7.5 If filters are not provided by the
EPA for sample collection and analysis, filter
lot blanks should be analyzed for Pb content.
For large filter lots (≤500 filters), randomly
select 20 to 30 filters from the lot and analyze
the filter or filter strips for Pb. For smaller
filter lots, a lesser number of filters can be
analyzed. Glass, quartz and PTFE filters must
not have levels of Pb above the criteria
specified in section 7.7.4 and, therefore,
blank correction should not be performed. If
acceptance testing shows levels of Pb above
the criteria in Section 7.7.4, corrective action
must be taken to reduce the levels before
proceeding.
7.8 The Initial Calibration Verification
(ICV), Lower Level Calibration Verification
(LLCV), and Continuing Calibration
Verification (CCV) solutions are prepared
from a different Pb source than the
calibration curve standards and at a
concentration that is either at or below the
midpoint on the calibration curve, but within
the calibration range. Both are prepared in
the same acid matrix as the calibration
standards. Note that the same solution may
be used for both the ICV and CCV. The ICV/
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
CCV and LLCV solutions must be prepared
fresh daily.
7.9 Tuning Solution. Prepare a tuning
solution according to the instrument
manufacturer’s recommendations. This
solution will be used to verify the mass
calibration and resolution of the instrument.
8.0
Quality Control (QC)
8.1 Standard QC practices shall be
employed to assess the validity of the data
generated, including: MDL, RB, duplicate
samples, spiked samples, serial dilutions,
ICV, CCV, LLCV, ICB, CCB, and SRMs/CRMs.
8.2 MDLs must be calculated in
accordance with 40 CFR part 136, Appendix
B. RBs with low-level standard spikes are
used to estimate the MDL. The low-level
standard spike is added to at least 7
individual filter strips and then carried
through the entire extraction procedure. This
will result in at least 7 individual samples to
be used for the MDL. The recommended
range for spiking the strips is 1 to 5 times the
estimated MDL.
8.3 For each batch of samples, one RB
and one reagent blank spike (RBS) that is
spiked at the same level as the sample spike
(see Section 8.6) must be prepared and
carried throughout the entire process. The
results of the RB must be below 0.001 mg/mL.
The recovery for the RBS must be within ±
20 percent of the expected value. If the RB
yields a result above 0.001 mg/mL, the source
of contamination must be identified and the
extraction and analysis repeated. Reagents
and labware must be suspected as sources of
contamination. Screening of reagents and
labware is addressed in Section 4.1.
8.4 Any samples that exceed the highest
calibration standard must be diluted and
rerun so that the concentration falls within
the curve. The minimum dilution will be 1
to 5 with matrix matched acid solution.
8.5 The internal standard response must
be monitored during the analysis. If the
internal standard response falls below 70
percent or rises above 120 percent of
expected due to possible matrix effects, the
sample must be diluted and reanalyzed. The
minimum dilution will be 1 to 5 with matrix
Frequency
ICB ....................
ICV ....................
LLCV .................
CCB ...................
CCV ...................
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Sample
Prior to first sample ..................................................................
Prior to first sample ..................................................................
Daily, before first sample and after last sample ......................
After every 10 extracted samples ............................................
After every 10 extracted samples ............................................
If any of these QC samples fails to meet
specifications, the source of the unacceptable
performance must be determined, the
problem corrected, and any samples not
bracketed by passing QC samples must be
reanalyzed.
8.9 For each batch of samples, one
certified reference material (CRM) must be
combined with a blank filter strip and carried
through the entire extraction procedure. The
result must be within ±10 percent of the
expected value.
8.10 For each run, a LLCV must be
analyzed. The LLCV must be prepared at a
concentration not more than three times the
lowest calibration standard and at a
concentration not used in the calibration
curve. The LLCV is used to assess
performance at the low end of the curve. If
the LLCV fails (±10 percent of the expected
value) the run must be terminated, the
problem corrected, the instrument
recalibrated, and the analysis repeated.
8.11 Pipettes used for volumetric transfer
must have the calibration checked at least
once every 6 months and pass ± 1 percent
accuracy and ≤ 1 percent RSD (precision)
based on five replicate readings. The pipettes
must be checked weekly for accuracy with a
single replicate. Any pipette that does not
meet ± 1 percent accuracy on the weekly
check must be removed from service,
repaired, and pass a full calibration check
before use.
8.12 Samples with physical deformities
are not quantitatively analyzable. The analyst
should visually check filters prior to
proceeding with preparation for holes, tears,
or non-uniform deposit which would prevent
representative sampling. Document any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
Frm 00051
matched acid solution. If the first dilution
does not correct the problem, additional
dilutions must be run until the internal
standard falls within the specified range.
8.6 For every batch of samples prepared,
there must be one duplicate and one spike
sample prepared. The spike added is to be at
a level that falls within the calibration curve,
normally the midpoint of the curve. The
initial plus duplicate sample must yield a
relative percent difference ≤ 20 percent. The
spike must be within ± 20 percent of the
expected value.
8.7 For each batch of samples, one extract
must be diluted five-fold and analyzed. The
corrected dilution result must be within ±10
percent of the undiluted result. The sample
chosen for the serial dilution shall have a
concentration at or above 10X the lowest
standard in the curve to ensure the diluted
value falls within the curve. If the serial
dilution fails, chemical or physical
interference should be suspected.
8.8 ICB, ICV, LLCV, CCB and CCV
samples are to be run as shown in the
following table.
Performance specification
Less than 0.001 μg/mL.
Within 90 to 110 percent of the expected value.
±10 percent of the expected value.
Less than 0.001 μg/mL.
Within 90–110 percent of the expected value.
deformities and qualify the data with flags
appropriately. Care must be taken to protect
filters from contamination. Filters must be
kept covered prior to sample preparation.
9.0 ICP MS Calibration
Follow the instrument manufacturer’s
instructions for the routine maintenance,
cleaning, and ignition procedures for the
specific ICP–MS instrument being used.
9.1 Ignite the plasma and wait for at least
one half hour for the instrument to warm up
before beginning any pre-analysis steps.
9.2 For the Thermo X-Series with Xt
cones, aspirate a 10 ng/mL tuning solution
containing In, Bi, and Ce (Cerium). Monitor
the intensities of In, Bi, Ce, and CeO (Cerium
oxide) and adjust the instrument settings to
achieve the highest In and Bi counts while
minimizing the CeO/Ce oxide ratio. For other
instruments, follow the manufacturer’s
recommended practice. Tune to meet the
instrument manufacturer’s specifications.
After tuning, place the sample aspiration
probe into a 2 percent HNO3 rinse solution
for at least 5 minutes to flush the system.
9.3 Aspirate a 5 ng/mL solution
containing Co, In, and Bi to perform a daily
instrument stability check. Run 10 replicates
of the solution. The percent RSD for the
replicates must be less than 3 percent at all
masses. If the percent RSD is greater than 3
percent, the sample introduction system,
pump tubing, and tune should be examined,
and the analysis repeated. Place the sample
aspiration probe into a 2 percent HNO3 rinse
solution for at least 5 minutes to flush the
system.
9.4 Load the calibration standards in the
autosampler and analyze using the same
method parameters that will be used to
PO 00000
40007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
analyze samples. The curve must include one
blank and at least 5 Pb-containing calibration
standards. The correlation coefficient must
be at least 0.998 for the curve to be accepted.
The lowest standard must recover ± 15
percent of the expected value and the
remaining standards must recover ± 10
percent of the expected value to be accepted.
9.5 Immediately after the calibration
curve is completed, analyze an ICV and an
ICB. The ICV must be prepared from a
different source of Pb than the calibration
standards. The ICV must recover 90–110
percent of the expected value for the run to
continue. The ICB must be less than 0.001
mg/mL. If either the ICV or the ICB fails, the
run must be terminated, the problem
identified and corrected, and the analysis restarted.
9.6 A LLCV, CCV and a CCB must be run
after the ICV and ICB. A CCV and CCB must
be run at a frequency of not less than every
10 extracted samples. A typical analytical
run sequence would be: Calibration blank,
Calibration standards, ICV, ICB, LLCV, CCV,
CCB, Extracts 1–10, CCV, CCB, Extracts 11–
20, CCV, CCB, Extracts 21–30, CCV, CCB,
LLCV, CCV, CCB. Extracts are any field
sample or QC samples that have been carried
through the extraction process. The CCV
solution is prepared from a different source
than the calibration standards and may be the
same as the ICV solution. The LLCV must be
within ± 10 percent of expected value. The
CCV value must be within ± 10 percent of
expected for the run to continue. The CCB
must be less than 0.001 mg/mL. If either the
CCV, LLCV, or CCB fails, the run must be
terminated, the problem identified and
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
40008
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
corrected, and the analysis re-started from
the last passing CCV/LLCV/CCB set.
9.7 A LLCV, CCV, and CCB set must be
run at the end of the analysis. The LLCV
must be within ± 30 percent of expected
value. If either the CCV, LLCV, or CCB fails,
the run must be terminated, the problem
identified and corrected, and the analysis restarted from the last passing CCV/LLCV/CCB
set.
10.0 Heated Ultrasonic Filter Strip
Extraction
All plasticware (e.g., Nalgene) and
glassware used in the extraction procedures
is soaked in 1 percent HNO3 (v/v) for at least
24 hours and rinsed with reagent water prior
to use. All mechanical pipettes used must be
calibrated to ±1 percent accuracy and ≤ 1
percent RSD at a minimum of once every 6
months.
10.1 Sample Preparation—Heated
Ultrasonic Bath
10.1.1 Extraction solution (1.03M HNO3 +
2.23M HCl). Prepare by adding 500 mL of
deionized water to a 1000 mL flask, adding
64.4 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 182 mL
of concentrated HCl, shaking to mix,
allowing solution to cool, diluting to volume
with reagent water, and inverting several
times to mix. Extraction solution must be
prepared at least weekly.
10.1.2 Use a ceramic knife and non-metal
ruler, or other cutting device that will not
contaminate the filter with Pb. Cut a 3⁄4 inch
X 8 inch strip from the glass fiber or quartz
filter by cutting a strip from the edge of the
filter where it has been folded along the 10
inch side at least 1 inch from the right or left
side to avoid the un-sampled area covered by
the filter holder. The filters must be carefully
handled to avoid dislodging deposits.
10.1.3 Using plastic tweezers, roll the
filter strip up in a coil and place the rolled
strip in the bottom of a labeled 50 mL
extraction tube. In a fume hood, add 15.00 ±
0.15 mL of the extraction solution (see
Section 10.1.1) using a calibrated mechanical
pipette. Ensure that the extraction solution
completely covers the filter strip.
10.1.4 Loosely cap the 50 mL extraction
tube and place it upright in a plastic rack.
When all samples have been prepared, place
the racks in an uncovered heated ultrasonic
water bath that has been preheated to 80 ±
5°C and ensure that the water level in the
ultrasonic is above the level of the extraction
solution in the tubes but well below the level
of the extraction tube caps to avoid
contamination. Start the ultrasonic bath and
allow the unit to run for 1 hour ± 5 minutes
at 80 ± 5°C.
10.1.5 Remove the rack(s) from the
ultrasonic bath and allow the racks to cool.
10.1.6 Add 25.00 ± 0.25 mL of D.I. water
with a calibrated mechanical pipette to bring
the sample to a final volume of 40.0 ± 0.4 mL.
Tightly cap the tubes, and vortex mix or
shake vigorously. Place the extraction tubes
in an appropriate holder and centrifuge for
20 minutes at 2500 revolutions per minute
(RPM).
CAUTION—Make sure that the centrifuge
holder has a flat bottom to support the flat
bottomed extraction tubes.
10.1.7 Pour an aliquot of the solution into
an autosampler vial for ICP–MS analysis to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
avoid the potential for contamination. Do not
pipette an aliquot of solution into the
autosampler vial.
10.1.8 Decant the extract to a clean tube,
cap tightly, and store the sample extract at
ambient laboratory temperature. Extracts may
be stored for up to 6 months from the date
of extraction.
10.2 47 mm PTFE Filter Extraction—
Heated Ultrasonic Bath
10.2.1 Extraction solution (1.03M HNO3 +
2.23M HCl). Prepare by adding 500 mL of D.I.
water to a 1000mL flask, adding 64.4 mL of
concentrated HNO3 and 182 mL of
concentrated HCl, shaking to mix, allowing
solution to cool, diluting to volume with
reagent water, and inverting several times to
mix. Extraction solution must be prepared at
least weekly.
10.2.2 Using plastic tweezers, bend the
PTFE filter into a U-shape and insert the
filter into a labeled 50 mL extraction tube
with the particle loaded side facing the
center of the tube. Gently push the filter to
the bottom of the extraction tube. In a fume
hood, add 25.00 ± 0.15 mL of the extraction
solution (see Section 10.2.1) using a
calibrated mechanical pipette. Ensure that
the extraction solution completely covers the
filter.
10.2.3 Loosely cap the 50 mL extraction
tube and place it upright in a plastic rack.
When all samples have been prepared, place
the racks in an uncovered heated ultrasonic
water bath that has been preheated to 80 ±
5°C and ensure that the water level in the
ultrasonic is above the level of the extraction
solution in the tubes, but well below the
level of the extraction tube caps to avoid
contamination. Start the ultrasonic bath and
allow the unit to run for 1 hour ± 5 minutes
at 80 ± 5°C.
10.2.4 Remove the rack(s) from the
ultrasonic bath and allow the racks to cool.
10.2.5 Add 25.00 ± 0.25 mL of D.I. water
with a calibrated mechanical pipette to bring
the sample to a final volume of 50.0 ± 0.4 mL.
Tightly cap the tubes, and vortex mix or
shake vigorously. Allow samples to stand for
one hour to allow complete diffusion of the
extracted Pb. The sample is now ready for
analysis.
Note: Although PTFE filters have only been
extracted using the ultrasonic extraction
procedure in the development of this FRM,
PTFE filters are inert and have very low Pb
content. No issues are expected with the
extraction of PTFE filters using the heated
block digestion method. However, prior to
using PTFE filters in the heated block
extraction method, extraction method
performance test using CRMs must be done
to confirm performance (see Section 8.9).
11.0 Hot Block Filter Strip Extraction
All plasticware (e.g., Nalgene) and
glassware used in the extraction procedures
is soaked in 1 percent HNO3 for at least 24
hours and rinsed with reagent water prior to
use. All mechanical pipettes used must be
calibrated to ±1 percent accuracy and ≤ 1
percent RSD at a minimum of once every 6
months.
11.1 Sample Preparation—Hot Block
Digestion
11.1.1 Extraction solution (1:19, v/v
HNO3). Prepare by adding 500 mL of D.I.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
water to a 1000 mL flask, adding 50 mL of
concentrated HNO3, shaking to mix, allowing
solution to cool, diluting to volume with
reagent water, and inverting several times to
mix. The extraction solution must be
prepared at least weekly.
11.1.2 Use a ceramic knife and non-metal
ruler, or other cutting device that will not
contaminate the filter with Pb. Cut a 1-inch
X 8-inch strip from the glass fiber or quartz
filter. Cut a strip from the edge of the filter
where it has been folded along the 10-inch
side at least 1 inch from the right or left side
to avoid the un-sampled area covered by the
filter holder. The filters must be carefully
handled to avoid dislodging particle
deposits.
11.1.3 Using plastic tweezers, roll the
filter strip up in a coil and place the rolled
strip in the bottom of a labeled 50 mL
extraction tube. In a fume hood, add 20.0 ±
0.15 mL of the extraction solution (see
Section 11.1.1) using a calibrated mechanical
pipette. Ensure that the extraction solution
completely covers the filter strip.
11.1.4 Place the extraction tube in the
heated block digester and cover with a
disposable polyethylene ribbed watch glass.
Heat at 95 ± 5°C for 1 hour and ensure that
the sample does not evaporate to dryness. For
proper heating, adjust the temperature
control of the hot block such that an
uncovered vessel containing 50 mL of water
placed in the center of the hot block can be
maintained at a temperature approximately,
but no higher than 85ßC. Once the vessel is
covered with a ribbed watch glass, the
temperature of the water will increase to
approximately 95°C.
11.1.5 Remove the rack(s) from the heated
block digester and allow the samples to cool.
11.1.6 Bring the samples to a final
volume of 50 mL with D.I. water. Tightly cap
the tubes, and vortex mix or shake vigorously
for at least 5 seconds. Set aside (with the
filter strip in the tube) for at least 30 minutes
to allow the HNO3 trapped in the filter to
diffuse into the extraction solution.
11.1.7 Shake thoroughly (with the filter
strip in the digestion tube) and let settle for
at least one hour. The sample is now ready
for analysis.
12.0 Measurement Procedure
12.1 Follow the instrument
manufacturer’s startup procedures for the
ICP–MS.
12.2 Set instrument parameters to the
appropriate operating conditions as
presented in the instrument manufacturer’s
operating manual and allow the instrument
to warm up for at least 30 minutes.
12.3 Calibrate the instrument per Section
9.0 of this method.
12.4 Verify the instrument is suitable for
analysis as defined in Sections 9.2 and 9.3.
12.5 As directed in Section 8.0 of this
method, analyze an ICV and ICB immediately
after the calibration curve followed by a
LLCV, then CCV and CCB. The acceptance
requirements for these parameters are
presented in Section 8.8.
12.6 Analyze a CCV and a CCB after every
10 extracted samples.
12.7 Analyze a LLCV, CCV and CCB at the
end of the analysis.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
12.8 A typical sample run will include
field samples, field sample duplicates, spiked
field sample extracts, serially diluted
samples, the set of QC samples listed in
Section 8.8 above, and one or more CRMs or
SRMs.
12.9 Any samples that exceed the highest
standard in the calibration curve must be
diluted and reanalyzed so that the diluted
concentration falls within the calibration
curve.
13.0 Results
13.1 The filter results must be initially
reported in mg/mL as analyzed. Any
additional dilutions must be accounted for.
The internal standard recoveries must be
included in the result calculation; this is
done by the ICP–MS software for most
commercially-available instruments. Final
results should be reported in mg Pb/m3 to
three significant figures as follows:
C = ((mg Pb/mL * Vf * A)* D))/Vs
Where:
C = Concentration, mg Pb/m3
mg Pb/mL = Lead concentration in solution
Vf = Total extraction solution volume
A = Area correction; 3⁄4″ × 8’’ strip = 5.25 in2
analyzed, A = 12.0 or 1’’ × 8″ strip = 7
in2 analyzed, A = 9.0
D = dilution factor (if required)
Vs = Actual volume of air sampled
The calculation assumes the use of a
standard 8-inch × 10-inch TSP filter which
has a sampled area of 9-inch × 7-inch (63.0
in2) due to the 1⁄2-inch filter holder border
around the outer edge. The 3⁄4-inch × 8-inch
strip has a sampled area of 3⁄4-inch × 7-inch
(5.25 in2). The 1-inch × 8-inch strip has a
sampled area of 1-inch × 7-inch (7.0 in2). If
filter lot blanks are provided for analysis,
refer to Section 7.7.5 of this method for
guidance on testing.
14.0 Method Performance
Information in this section is an example
of typical performance results achieved by
this method. Actual performance must be
demonstrated by each individual laboratory
and instrument.
14.1 Performance data have been collected
to estimate MDLs for this method. MDLs
were determined in accordance with 40 CFR
136, Appendix B. MDLs were estimated for
glass fiber, quartz, and PTFE filters using
seven reagent/filter blank solutions spiked
40009
with low level Pb at three times the estimated
MDL of 0.001 mg/mL. Tables 1, 3, and 5
shows the MDLs estimated using both the
ultrasonic and hot block extraction methods
for glass fiber and quartz filters and the
ultrasonic method for PTFE filters. The MDLs
are well below the EPA requirement of five
percent of the current Pb NAAQS or 0.0075
mg/m3. These MDLs are provided to
demonstrate the adequacy of the method’s
performance for Pb in TSP. Each laboratory
using this method should determine MDLs in
their laboratory and verify them annually. It
is recommended that laboratories also
perform the optional iterative procedure in
40 CFR 136, Appendix B to verify the
reasonableness of the estimated MDL and
subsequent MDL determinations.
14.2 Extraction method recovery tests
with glass fiber and quartz filter strips, and
PTFE filters spiked with NIST SRMs were
performed using the ultrasonic/HNO3 and
HCl filter extraction methods and
measurement of the dissolved Pb with ICP–
MS. Tables 2, 4, and 6 show recoveries
obtained with these SRM. The recoveries for
all SRMs were ≥90 percent at the 95 percent
confidence level.
TABLE 1—METHOD DETECTION LIMITS DETERMINED BY ANALYSIS OF REAGENT/GLASS FIBER FILTER BLANKS SPIKED
WITH LOW-LEVEL PB SOLUTION
Ultrasonic
extraction
method
μg/m3*
n = 1 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 2 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 3 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 4 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 5 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 6 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 7 ................................................................................................................................................................................
Average ............................................................................................................................................................................
Standard Deviation ..........................................................................................................................................................
MDL** ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Hotblock
extraction
method
μg/m3*
0.0000702
0.0000715
0.0000611
0.0000587
0.0000608
0.0000607
0.0000616
0.0000635
0.0000051
0.0000161
0.000533
0.000482
0.000509
0.000427
0.000449
0.000539
0.000481
0.000489
0.000042
0.000131
* Assumes 2000 m3 of air sampled.
** MDL is 3.143 times the standard deviation of the results for seven sample replicates analyzed.
TABLE 2—RECOVERIES OF LEAD FROM NIST SRMS SPIKED ONTO GLASS FIBER FILTERS
Recovery, ICP–MS, (percent)
Extraction method
NIST 1547
plant
Ultrasonic Bath ................................................................................................
Block Digestion ................................................................................................
NIST 2709 soil
100 ± 4
92 ± 7
NIST 2583
dust
98 ± 1
98 ± 3
103 ± 8
103 ± 4
NIST 2582
paint
101 ± 0
94 ± 4
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
TABLE 3—METHOD DETECTION LIMITS DETERMINED BY ANALYSIS OF REAGENT/QUARTZ FILTER BLANKS SPIKED WITH
LOW-LEVEL PB SOLUTION
Ultrasonic
extraction
method
μg/m3*
n
n
n
n
=
=
=
=
1
2
3
4
................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Hotblock
extraction
method
μg/m3*
0.000533
0.000552
0.000534
0.000684
0.000274
0.000271
0.000281
0.000269
40010
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—METHOD DETECTION LIMITS DETERMINED BY ANALYSIS OF REAGENT/QUARTZ FILTER BLANKS SPIKED WITH
LOW-LEVEL PB SOLUTION—Continued
Ultrasonic
extraction
method
μg/m3*
n = 5 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 6 ................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 7 ................................................................................................................................................................................
Average ............................................................................................................................................................................
Standard Deviation ..........................................................................................................................................................
MDL** ...............................................................................................................................................................................
Hotblock
extraction
method
μg/m3*
0.000532
0.000532
0.000552
0.000560
0.000055
0.000174
0.000278
0.000272
0.000261
0.000272
0.000007
0.000021
* Assumes 2000 m3 of air sampled.
** MDL is 3.143 times the standard deviation of the results for seven sample replicates analyzed.
TABLE 4—RECOVERIES OF LEAD FROM NIST SRMS SPIKED ONTO QUARTZ FIBER FILTERS
Recovery, ICP–MS, (percent)
Extraction method
NIST 1547
plant
NIST 2709 soil
101 ± 6
106 ± 3
Ultrasonic Bath ................................................................................................
Block Digestion ................................................................................................
95 ± 1
104 ± 3
NIST 2583
dust
91 ± 5
92 ± 6
NIST 2582
paint
93 ± 1
95 ± 2
TABLE 5—METHOD DETECTION LIMITS DETERMINED BY ANALYSIS OF REAGENT/PTFE FILTER BLANKS SPIKED WITH LOWLEVEL PB SOLUTION
Ultrasonic
extraction
method
μg/m3*
n = 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 2 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 3 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 4 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 5 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 6 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
n = 7 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Average ................................................................................................................................................................................................
Standard Deviation ..............................................................................................................................................................................
MDL** ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
0.001775
0.001812
0.001773
0.001792
0.001712
0.001767
0.001778
0.001773
0.000031
0.000097
* Assumes 24 m3 of air sampled.
** MDL is 3.143 times the standard deviation of the results for seven sample replicates analyzed.
TABLE 6—RECOVERIES OF LEAD FROM NIST SRMS SPIKED ONTO PTFE FILTERS
Recovery, ICP–MS, (percent)
Extraction method
NIST 1547
plant
Ultrasonic Bath ................................................................................................
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
15.0
Pollution Prevention
15.1 Pollution prevention encompasses
any technique that reduces or eliminates the
quantity and/or toxicity of waste at the point
of generation. Numerous opportunities for
pollution prevention exist in laboratory
operations. Whenever feasible, laboratory
personnel should use pollution prevention
techniques to address their waste generation.
The sources of pollution generated with this
procedure are waste acid extracts and Pbcontaining solutions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
NIST 2709 soil
104 ± 5
15.2 For information about pollution
prevention that may be applicable to
laboratories and research institutions, consult
Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical
Management for Waste Reduction, available
from the American Chemical Society’s
Department of Government Relations and
Science Policy, 1155 16th St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20036, www.acs.org.
16.0 Waste Management
16.1 Laboratory waste management
practices must be conducted consistent with
all applicable rules and regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
93 ± 1
NIST 2583
dust
108 ± 11
NIST 2582
paint
96 ± 3
Laboratories are urged to protect air, water,
and land by minimizing all releases from
hood and bench operations, complying with
the letter and spirit of any sewer and
discharge permits and regulations, and by
complying with all solid and hazardous
waste regulation. For further information on
waste management, consult The Waste
Management Manual for Laboratory
Personnel available from the American
Chemical Society listed in Section 15.2 of
this method.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
16.2 Waste HNO3, HCl, and solutions
containing these reagents and/or Pb must be
placed in labeled bottles and delivered to a
commercial firm that specializes in removal
of hazardous waste.
17.0 References
FACDQ (2007). Report of the Federal
Advisory Committee on Detection and
Quantitation Approaches and Uses in
Clean Water Act Programs, submitted to
the U.S. EPA December 2007. Available:
https://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/
cwa/det/upload/final-report-200712.pdf.
Rice J (2013). Results from the Development
of a New Federal Reference Method
(FRM) for Lead in Total Suspended
Particulate (TSP) Matter. Docket # EPA–
HQ–OAR–2012–0210.
U.S. EPA (2007). Method 6020A—
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Revision 1, February
2007. Available: https://www.epa.gov/
osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/
6020a.pdf.
U.S. EPA (2011). A Laboratory Study of
Procedures Evaluated by the Federal
Advisory Committee on Detection and
Quantitation Approaches and Uses in
Clean Water Act Programs. December
2011. Available: https://water.epa.gov/
scitech/methods/cwa/det/upload/
fac_report_2009.pdf.
[FR Doc. 2013–15880 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0376]; FRL–9828–2
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Removal of Consumer and Commercial
Products Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Virginia State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The revisions remove four articles
located in chapter 9VAC5–40 (Existing
Stationary Sources) from the Virginia
SIP. These articles are being removed
from the Virginia SIP because they were
repealed in their entirety and have been
replaced by the updated corresponding
articles in chapter 9VAC5–45
(Consumer and Commercial Products).
The provisions of chapter 9VAC5–45 are
not affected by the removal of these
regulations. EPA is approving these
revisions to remove the above
mentioned articles in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
This rule is effective on
September 3, 2013 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
written comment by August 2, 2013. If
EPA receives such comments, it will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
and inform the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2013–0376 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0376,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning, Air
Protection Division, Mailcode 3AP30,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2013–
0376. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40011
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of SIP Revision
On April 2, 2013, the Commonwealth
of Virginia submitted formal revisions to
its SIP. These revisions consist of
removing the following articles located
in chapter 9VAC5–40 (Existing
Stationary Sources), part II (Emission
Standards) from the Virginia SIP: Article
39 (Emission Standards for Asphalt
Paving Operations), article 42 (Emission
Standards for Portable Fuel Container
Spillage), article 49 (Emission Standards
for Architectural and Industrial
Maintenance Coatings), and article 50
(Emission Standards for Consumer
Products). These articles are being
removed from the Virginia SIP because
they were repealed in their entirety from
Virginia’s state-enforceable air pollution
control regulations. They have been
replaced by corresponding articles in
chapter 9VAC5–45 (Consumer and
Commercial Products), part II (Emission
Standards), articles 1, 3, 5, and 7, which
was approved by EPA and published as
a final rule on January 26, 2012 (See 77
FR 3928). This rule became effective on
February 27, 2012 and contains the
required elements for a Federally
enforceable rule, including emission
limitations, compliance procedures and
test methods, compliance dates, and
record keeping provisions.
II. General Information Pertaining to
SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
that provides, subject to certain
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40000-40011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15880]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 50
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0210; FRL-9822-1]
RIN 2060-AP89
Method for the Determination of Lead in Total Suspended
Particulate Matter
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is establishing a new Federal Reference Method (FRM)
for measuring Lead (Pb) in total suspended particulate matter (TSP)
collected from ambient air. This method is intended for use by
analytical laboratories performing the analysis of Pb in TSP to support
data collection for the Pb National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). The existing FRM for Pb is designated as a new Federal
Equivalent Method (FEM), and the currently designated FEMs are
retained. This action avoids any disruption to existing Pb monitoring
networks and data collection and does not affect the FRM
[[Page 40001]]
for TSP sample collection (High-Volume Method).
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 2, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0210. All documents in the docket are listed
on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. The Air Docket and the Public Reading Room are open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-
1742. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at: https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Joann Rice, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Ambient Air
Monitoring Group (C304-06), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-3372; fax number: (919) 541-1903; email address:
rice.joann@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. Purpose of the New Reference Method
B. Rationale for Selection of the New Reference Method
C. Comments on the Proposed Rule
D. Conclusions
II. Summary of Method
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
A. Purpose of the New Reference Method
On November 12, 2008, the EPA substantially strengthened the NAAQS
for Pb (73 FR 66964). The EPA revised the level of the primary (health-
based) standard from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\) of Pb
to 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ of Pb measured in TSP and revised the secondary
(welfare-based) standard to be identical in all respects to the primary
standard. The current Pb in TSP FRM is based on Flame Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy (FAAS) as specified in 40 CFR part 50, Appendix G. The FRM
in Appendix G was originally promulgated in 1978 when FAAS was widely
used and considered the best available method to support Pb NAAQS data
collection at a level of 1.5 [mu]g/m\3\. A new Pb in TSP FRM is needed
to: (1) Take advantage of improved extraction methods that are now
available with improved precision, sample throughput, and extraction
efficiency; (2) address advances in measurement technology that have
occurred since promulgation of the original FRM; and (3) address the
improved measurement sensitivity (detection limits) needed in response
to the tightened Pb NAAQS.
The reference method for Pb in TSP includes two parts: the analysis
method for Pb in TSP as specified in 40 CFR 50, Appendix G, and the
reference method for high-volume sampling of TSP as specified in 40 CFR
50, Appendix B. The new FRM is for the analysis of Pb in TSP based on
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). The FRM serves
as the definitive method for routinely analyzing Pb for comparison to
the NAAQS and also serves as the standard of comparison for determining
equivalence of candidate FEMs. This method replaces the existing method
in 40 CFR 50, Appendix G. The FRM that was promulgated in 1978 as
Appendix G becomes an approved FEM and the currently designated FEMs
are retained. The EPA believes this is appropriate because the new FRM
is based on two methods that were tested and approved as FEMs (EQL-
0510-191 and EQL-0710-192) to ensure comparability with the FAAS
method. This approach permits continued use of the legacy FRM (as an
FEM) and the existing FEMs. This avoids any disruption to state and
local air monitoring agencies using these methods for Pb monitoring.
The reference method for high volume sampling of TSP will continue to
be performed in accordance with the FRM described in Appendix B, and,
therefore, is not included as part of this FRM.
With the tightened NAAQS in 2008 and the need for increased
measurement sensitivity, an improved measurement technology has become
available to meet the needs of the current NAAQS. The FAAS method is
less frequently used in the Pb ambient monitoring network (about 10
percent of the sites reported Pb in TSP data to the EPA's Air Quality
System in 2012 using the FAAS method) and ICP-based methods have
increased in popularity. Recently, the FAAS method has mainly been used
as the reference method for testing and designation of candidate FEMs
for Pb in accordance with 40 CFR 53.33. With the lowered Pb
concentration testing range in Part 53 and new requirement for a Method
Detection Limit (MDL) of 0.0075 [mu]g/m\3\ (described below), the FAAS
method sensitivity and availability of laboratories with FAAS
capability have created some challenges for comparability testing of
new FEMs.
In 2008, the EPA also revised the performance-based requirements
for Pb FEMs in Part 53. The performance requirements were revised to be
consistent with the revised Pb NAAQS level. Specifically, the Pb
concentration range at which the FEM comparability testing is conducted
was lowered to a range of 0.045 to 0.375 [mu]g/m\3\ and the requirement
for a minimum method detection limit was established at 0.0075 [mu]g/
m\3\. The detection limit of the new FRM is more than adequate to meet
the reduced testing range and detection limit requirements. The FRM's
average detection limit for Pb-spiked filters is estimated at 0.00009
[mu]g/m\3\, which is well below the requirement of 0.0075 [mu]g/m\3\.
B. Rationale for Selection of the New Reference Method
The FRM is based on two recently approved FEMs for extracting Pb
from glass fiber filters for subsequent analysis by ICP-MS: (1) Method
EQL-0510-191 which uses a heated (80 5[deg]C) ultrasonic
water bath with 1.03M nitric (HNO3)/2.23M hydrochloric (HCl)
acids, and (2) Method EQL-0710-192 which uses a heated (95
5[deg]C) graphite block (hot block) with 3.5 percent volume/
[[Page 40002]]
volume (v/v) HNO3. In selecting this methodology, the EPA's
primary considerations were: methods that have already been tested and
approved against the FAAS method; use of equipment that is commonly
used; a method that is practical (use of a single vessel for the entire
extraction process and storage); and a method with improved sensitivity
and throughput to increase efficiency and cost effectiveness over the
legacy FRM. ICP-MS was chosen as the analytical technique because it
has improved sensitivity, selectivity, linear range, and is more
readily available than FAAS in laboratories today.
The FRM uses methods from two existing FEMs that have been proven
comparable to FAAS and, therefore, retains consistency with the legacy
FRM (Rice, 2013). The FRM is only intended for the analysis of Pb in
TSP and allows for the use of glass fiber, quartz, or
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters. HNO3 alone is
sufficient for the extraction of Pb; however, the ultrasonic extraction
method includes HCl to allow monitoring agencies some flexibility for
future needs that may include the extraction of other metals. HCl is
needed to aid the extraction of other metals that are not easily
brought into solution with HNO3 alone. The FRM was evaluated
for the extraction of Pb only. If the FRM is used for metals other than
Pb, the user must evaluate the FRM's applicability before use. The hot
block extraction method uses only HNO3 and must also be
evaluated by the user before use to extract metals other than Pb.
The approach and key specifications of the method were submitted
for peer review to the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC)
Ambient Air Monitoring and Methods Subcommittee. Public meetings were
held to discuss the method and related monitoring issues on September
15, 2010. Comments on the method and approach were provided in writing
in a letter dated November 30, 2010 (EPA-CASAC-11-002),\1\ forwarded by
CASAC to the Administrator.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CASAC's final report on the Approach for the Development of
a New Federal Reference Method (FRM) for Lead in Total Suspended
Particulates (Pb-TSP) can be found at: https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/
sabproduct.nsf/DA39026E54BAF46E8525781D00606633/$File/EPA-CASAC-11-
002-unsigned.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CASAC was supportive of the ICP-MS analytical method and found
the approach to be appropriate with superior sensitivity and
specificity for Pb. The CASAC recommended a strategy, using a
performance-based FRM, to provide flexibility for use of non-FRM or FEM
measurement methods and recommended that a third extraction method
(microwave) be added to the FRM for its greater sample throughput and
potential for reduced sample-to-sample variability. The CASAC viewed
the comprehensiveness of the FRM test plan to be appropriate, and
recommended that the EPA consider separating the extraction methods
from the analytical methods so that any of the FRM extraction methods
can be used with any of the FRM analytical measurement methods.
The federal reference and equivalence testing method for Pb in 40
CFR 53.33 serves as the performance-based method approach for the FEM
approval process. Candidate methods are tested using the performance
specifications of part 40 CFR part 53 for acceptance and approval as
equivalent methods. Users also have the flexibility to test and submit
additional extraction and analysis methods for review and approval as
equivalent methods. The EPA believes that microwave extraction is a
viable option and is already available as an approved FEM.\2\ The
ultrasonic and hot block approaches are sufficient for the extraction
of Pb and provide high sample throughput, low consumable costs, and
lower equipment costs while minimizing the risk of cross contamination
and sample loss. In addition, the EPA believes that the existing FEMs
\3\ currently provide a wide variety of extraction and analytical
methods and the EPA strongly encourages monitoring agencies to consider
adopting one of the already approved FEMs in lieu of submitting new FEM
applications. The FRM has two extraction methods (heated ultrasonic and
hot block) and one analytical method (ICP-MS). The FRM allows for the
use of either of the two extraction methods specified with the ICP-MS
analytical method. The method also allows for the use of glass fiber,
PTFE, or quartz filter media for the collection of Pb in TSP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ FEM EQL-0400-0140 (65 FR 26603, May 8, 2000).
\3\ The list of current FEMs is located at: https://epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/criteria/reference-equivalent-methods-list.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Comments on the Proposed Rule
On February 5, 2013, the EPA proposed a new FRM for determination
of Pb in TSP (78 FR 8066) and solicited comment on the proposed method.
The EPA received one public comment by the close of the public comment
period on March 7, 2013. The commenter questioned the meaning of the
MDLs estimated from the analysis of blanks. The commenter recommended
that an MDL estimated from blanks include the mean of the blanks and be
consistent with the Report of the Federal Advisory Committee on
Detection and Quantitation (FACDQ) Approaches and Uses in Clean Water
Act Programs (FACDQ, 2007). The Federal Advisory Committee recommended
that EPA adopt a new procedure for estimated method sensitivity and
replace 40 CFR 136, Appendix B (Definition and Procedure for the
Determination of the Method Detection Limit) with the new procedure.
The FACDQ procedure described an approach for calculating MDLs and
quantitation limits. The EPA conducted a pilot study to assess whether
the procedure recommended by the FACDQ could generate reliable
estimates of the lowest concentration at which measurement quality
objectives could be achieved (U.S. EPA, 2011). Based on the pilot study
results, the EPA concluded that none of the procedures tested
consistently generated accurate estimates of the lowest concentration
at which the study measurement quality objectives were achieved. The
EPA believes that more development and testing of the FACDQ procedure
are warranted.\4\ Accordingly, based on the currently available
information, the EPA believes that the procedures identified in 40 CFR
135, Appendix B are a more appropriate basis for estimating MDLs for
the FRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Refer to: https://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/det/index.cfm for EPA's Procedures for Detection and Quantitation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA provided estimates in the proposed rule for MDLs based on
reagent/filter blanks and reagent/filter blanks spiked with a Pb
solution. The EPA estimated MDLs based on 40 CFR 136, Appendix B which
recommends that MDLs be determined using a concentration value that is
between 1 and 5 times the estimated MDL. However, 40 CFR 136, Appendix
B does not specify the use of reagent/filter blanks for estimating the
detection limit. The estimate of MDLs based on reagent/filter blanks is
not consistent with 40 CFR 136, Appendix B; therefore, the MDL
estimates from reagent/filter blanks have been removed. The remaining
MDL estimates in Tables 1, 3, and 5 were determined using reagent/
filter blanks that were spiked with Pb at three times the estimated
detection limit of 0.001 [mu]g/mL. The MDLs were estimated to
demonstrate method performance that is more than adequate to meet the
MDL requirements of 0.0075 [mu]g/m\3\ for Pb in TSP. It is recommended
that laboratories performing this method initially estimate MDLs in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B and
[[Page 40003]]
confirm the MDLs annually. In addition, the EPA recommends that
laboratories consider performing the optional iterative procedure in
Part 136, Appendix B to verify the reasonableness of the initially
estimated MDL and subsequent MDL determinations.
D. Conclusions
After consideration of the public comment on the estimate of MDL
from reagent/filter blanks, the EPA has concluded that the rule should
be consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B.
Accordingly, any language referring to the estimate of MDLs using
reagent/filter blanks and the MDLs estimated from reagent/filter blanks
in Tables 1, 3, and 5 have been removed. The MDLs estimated from the
Pb-spiked reagent/filter blanks remain and demonstrate that the method
has more than adequate sensitivity to support the Pb-TSP MDL
requirement of 0.0075 [mu]g/m\3\. No other comments were received nor
revisions made to the proposed rule. The rule is otherwise finalized as
proposed.
II. Summary of Method
The FRM uses the ambient air sample collection procedures of the
high-volume TSP method (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix B) and the analytical
procedure for the measurement of Pb based on ICP-MS. Two extraction
methods are used: One using heated ultrasonic and one using hot block
digestion. The extraction methods and ICP-MS analysis method have been
tested and found acceptable for extraction of Pb from glass fiber,
PTFE, or quartz filter media. This method also met the precision and
bias goals for Pb in TSP (Rice 2013). This method replaces the previous
FRM specified in 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix G. Although the previous FRM
in Appendix G is adequate, this method offers advantages over the
previous FRM by providing improved sensitivity or detection limits,
precision, sample throughput, and extraction efficiency.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is,
therefore, not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This rule is to promulgate a new
FRM for Pb in TSP, and to designate the existing FRM as an FEM, and
does not add any information collection requirements beyond those
imposed by the existing Pb monitoring requirements.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of this rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as (1) a small business as defined by
the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of this rule on small
entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule
will not impose any additional monitoring requirements beyond those
specified in the current regulations, nor will it require any changes
in approved monitoring methods. As such, it will not impose any
requirements on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531-1538 for state, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this action is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly
or uniquely affect small governments. This action establishes a new FRM
for state and local air monitoring agencies to use as one of the
approved methods for measurement of Pb in TSP and to designate the
existing FRM as an FEM. It does not create any additional monitoring
requirements or require changes in approved monitoring methods.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This action establishes a new FRM
for state and local air monitoring agencies to use as one of the
approved methods for measurement of Pb in TSP and designates the
existing FRM as an FEM. This action does not create any new monitoring
requirements or require any changes in approved monitoring methods.
Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this action.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule
imposes no requirements on tribal governments. This action establishes
a new FRM for state and local air monitoring agencies to use as one of
the approved methods for measurement of Pb in TSP and designates the
existing FRM as an FEM. This action does not create any new monitoring
requirements, nor require any changes in approved monitoring methods.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 F.R. 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of the EO
has the potential to influence the regulation. This action is not
subject to EO 13045 because it does not establish an environmental
standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
[[Page 40004]]
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note),
directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs the EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations when the agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This rule involves environmental monitoring and measurement
consistent with the agency's Performance Based Measurement System
(PBMS). The PBMS approach is intended to be more flexible and cost-
effective for the regulated community; it is also intended to encourage
innovation in analytical technology and improved data quality.
Specifically, this rule establishes a new FRM for Pb in TSP
measurements. The EPA used voluntary consensus standards in the
preparation of this FRM. The FRM is the benchmark against which all
ambient monitoring methods are compared. The FRM is not a voluntary
consensus standard.
The FEM equivalency criteria contained in 40 CFR part 53 constitute
performance criteria. Therefore, the EPA is not precluding the use of
any method, whether it constitutes a voluntary consensus standard or
not, as long as it meets the specified performance criteria in 40 CFR
part 53 and is approved by the EPA pursuant to those regulations.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This action establishes a new FRM for state and local air
monitoring agencies to use as one of the approved methods for
measurement of Pb in TSP and designates the existing FRM as an FEM.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective August 2, 2013.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 50
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, and Lead.
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Bob Perciasepe,
Acting Administrator.
For reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations sets forth the following.
PART 50--NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 50 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
0
2. Appendix G to part 50 is revised to read as follows:
Appendix G to Part 50--Reference Method for the Determination of Lead
in Total Suspended Particulate Matter
1.0 Scope and Applicability
Based on review of the air quality criteria and national ambient
air quality standard (NAAQS) for lead (Pb) completed in 2008, the
EPA made revisions to the primary and secondary NAAQS for Pb to
protect public health and welfare. The EPA revised the level from
1.5 [mu]g/m\3\ to 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ while retaining the current
indicator of Pb in total suspended particulate matter (Pb-TSP).
Pb-TSP is collected for 24 hours on a TSP filter as described in
Appendix B of part 50, the Reference Method for the Determination of
Suspended Particulate Matter in the Atmosphere (High-Volume Method).
This method is for the analysis of Pb from TSP filters by
Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) using a heated
ultrasonic bath with nitric acid (HNO3) and hydrochloric
acid (HCl) or a heated block (hot block) digester with
HNO3 for filter extraction.
This method is based on the EPA's Office of Solid Waste (SW-846)
Method 6020A--Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (U.S.
EPA, 2007). Wording in certain sections of this method is
paraphrased or taken directly from Method 6020A.
1.1 ICP-MS is applicable for the sub-[micro]g/mL (ppb)
determination of Pb in a wide variety of matrices. Results reported
for monitoring or compliance purposes are calculated in [mu]g/m\3\
at local conditions (LC). This procedure describes a method for the
acid extraction of Pb in particulate matter collected on glass
fiber, quartz, or PTFE filters and measurement of the extracted Pb
using ICP-MS.
1.2 Due to variations in the isotopic abundance of Pb, the value
for total Pb must be based on the sum of the signal intensities for
isotopic masses, 206, 207, and 208. Most instrument software
packages are able to sum the primary isotope signal intensities
automatically.
1.3 ICP-MS requires the use of an internal standard. \115\In
(Indium), \165\Ho (Holmium), and \209\Bi (Bismuth) are recommended
internal standards for the determination of Pb.
1.4 Use of this method is restricted to use by, or under
supervision of, properly trained and experienced laboratory
personnel. Requirements include training and experience in inorganic
sample preparation, including acid extraction, and also knowledge in
the recognition and in the correction of spectral, chemical and
physical interference in ICP-MS.
2.0 Summary of Method
2.1 This method describes the acid extraction of Pb in
particulate matter collected on glass fiber, quartz, or PTFE ambient
air filters with subsequent measurement of Pb by ICP-MS. Estimates
of the Method Detection Limit (MDL) or sensitivity of the method are
provided in Tables 1, 3 and 5 and determined using Pb-spiked filters
or filter strips analyzed in accordance with the guidance provided
in 40
[[Page 40005]]
CFR 136, Appendix B--Determination and procedures for the
Determination of the Method Detection Limit--Revision 1.1. The
analytical range of the method is 0.00024 [micro]g/m\3\ to 0.60
[micro]g/m\3\, and based on the low and high calibration curve
standards and a nominal filter sample volume of 2000 m\3\.
2.2 This method includes two extraction methods. In the first
method, a solution of HNO3 and HCl is added to the
filters or filter strips in plastic digestion tubes and the tubes
are placed in a heated ultrasonic bath for one hour to facilitate
the extraction of Pb. Following ultrasonication, the samples are
brought to a final volume of 40 mL (50 mL for PTFE filters), vortex
mixed or shaken vigorously, and centrifuged prior to aliquots being
taken for ICP-MS analysis. In the second method, a solution of
dilute HNO3 is added to the filter strips in plastic
digestion tubes and the tubes placed into the hot block digester.
The filter strip is completely covered by the solution. The tubes
are covered with polypropylene watch glasses and refluxed. After
reflux, the samples are diluted to a final volume of 50 mL with
reagent water and mixed before analysis.
2.3 Calibration standards and check standards are prepared to
matrix match the acid composition of the samples. ICP-MS analysis is
then performed. With this method, the samples are first aspirated
and the aerosol thus created is transported by a flow of argon gas
into the plasma torch. The ions produced (e.g., Pb\+1\) in the
plasma are extracted via a differentially-pumped vacuum interface
and are separated on the basis of their mass-to-charge ratio. The
ions are quantified by a channel electron multiplier or a Faraday
detector and the signal collected is processed by the instrument's
software. Interferences must be assessed and corrected for, if
present.
3.0 Definitions
Pb--Elemental or ionic lead
HNO3--Nitric acid
HCl--Hydrochloric acid
ICP-MS--Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer
MDL--Method detection limit
RSD--Relative standard deviation
RPD--Relative percent difference
CB--Calibration Blank
CAL--Calibration Standard
ICB--Initial calibration blank
CCB--Continuing calibration blank
ICV--Initial calibration verification
CCV--Continuing calibration verification
LLCV--Lower Level Calibration Verification, serves as the lower
level ICV and lower level CCV
RB--Reagent blank
RBS--Reagent blank spike
MSDS--Material Safety Data Sheet
NIST--National Institute of Standards and Technology
D.I. water--Deionized water
SRM--NIST Standard Reference Material
CRM--Certified Reference Material
EPA--Environmental Protection Agency
v/v--Volume to volume ratio
4.0 Interferences
4.1 Reagents, glassware, plasticware, and other sample
processing hardware may yield artifacts and/or interferences to
sample analysis. If reagent blanks, filter blanks, or quality
control blanks yield results above the detection limit, the source
of contamination must be identified. All containers and reagents
used in the processing of the samples must be checked for
contamination prior to sample extraction and analysis. Reagents
shall be diluted to match the final concentration of the extracts
and analyzed for Pb. Labware shall be rinsed with dilute acid
solution and the solution analyzed. Once a reagent or labware
article (such as extraction tubes) from a manufacturer has been
successfully screened, additional screening is not required unless
contamination is suspected.
4.2 Isobaric elemental interferences in ICP-MS are caused by
isotopes of different elements forming atomic ions with the same
nominal mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) as the species of interest. There
are no species found in ambient air that will result in isobaric
interference with the three Pb isotopes (206, 207, and 208) being
measured. Polyatomic interferences occur when two or more elements
combine to form an ion with the same mass-to-charge ratio as the
isotope being measured. Pb is not subject to interference from
common polyatomic ions and no correction is required.
4.3 The distribution of Pb isotopes is not constant. The
analysis of total Pb should be based on the summation of signal
intensities for the isotopic masses 206, 207, and 208. In most
cases, the instrument software can perform the summation
automatically.
4.4 Physical interferences are associated with the sample
nebulization and transport processes as well as with ion-
transmission efficiencies. Dissolved solids can deposit on the
nebulizer tip of a pneumatic nebulizer and on the interface skimmers
of the ICP-MS. Nebulization and transport processes can be affected
if a matrix component causes a change in surface tension or
viscosity. Changes in matrix composition can cause significant
signal suppression or enhancement. These interferences are
compensated for by use of internal standards. Sample dilution will
reduce the effects of high levels of dissolved salts, but
calibration standards must be prepared in the extraction medium and
diluted accordingly.
4.5 Memory interferences are related to sample transport and
result when there is carryover from one sample to the next. Sample
carryover can result from sample deposition on the sample and
skimmer cones and from incomplete rinsing of the sample solution
from the plasma torch and the spray chamber between samples. These
memory effects are dependent upon both the analyte being measured
and sample matrix and can be minimized through the use of suitable
rinse times.
5.0 Health and Safety Cautions
5.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity of reagents used in this
method has not been fully established. Each chemical should be
regarded as a potential health hazard and exposure to these
compounds should be as low as reasonably achievable. Each laboratory
is responsible for maintaining a current file of OSHA regulations
regarding the safe handling of the chemicals specified in this
method. A reference file of material safety data sheets (MSDSs)
should be available to all personnel involved in the chemical
analysis. Specifically, concentrated HNO3 presents
various hazards and is moderately toxic and extremely irritating to
skin and mucus membranes. Use this reagent in a fume hood whenever
possible and if eye or skin contact occurs, flush with large volumes
of water. Always wear safety glasses or a shield for eye protection,
protective clothing, and observe proper mixing when working with
these reagents.
5.2 Concentrated HNO3 and HCl are moderately toxic
and extremely irritating to the skin. Use these reagents in a fume
hood, and if eye and skin contact occurs, flush with large volumes
of water. Always wear safety glasses or a shield for eye protection
when working with these reagents. The component of this procedure
requiring the greatest care is HNO3. HNO3 is a
strong, corrosive, oxidizing agent that requires protection of the
eyes, skin, and clothing. Items to be worn during use of this
reagent include:
1. Safety goggles (or safety glasses with side shields),
2. Acid resistant rubber gloves, and
3. A protective garment such as a laboratory apron.
HNO3 spilled on clothing will destroy the fabric; contact
with the skin underneath will result in a burn.
It is also essential that an eye wash fountain or eye wash
bottle be available during performance of this method. An eye wash
bottle has a spout that covers the eye. If acid or any other
corrosive gets into the eye, the water in this bottle is squirted
onto the eye to wash out the harmful material. Eye washing should be
performed with large amounts of water immediately after exposure.
Medical help should be sought immediately after washing. If either
acid, but especially HNO3, is spilled onto the skin, wash
immediately with large amounts of water. Medical attention is not
required unless the burn appears to be significant. Even after
washing and drying, HNO3 may leave the skin slightly
brown in color; this will heal and fade with time.
5.3 Pb salts and Pb solutions are toxic. Great care must be
taken to ensure that samples and standards are handled properly;
wash hands thoroughly after handling.
5.4 Care must be taken when using the ultrasonic bath and hot
block digester as they are capable of causing mild burns. Users
should refer to the safety guidance provided by the manufacturer of
their specific equipment.
5.5 Analytical plasma sources emit radio frequency radiation in
addition to intense ultra violet (UV) radiation. Suitable
precautions should be taken to protect personnel from such hazards.
The inductively coupled plasma should only be viewed with proper eye
protection from UV emissions.
6.0 Equipment
6.1 Thermo Scientific X-Series ICP-MS or equivalent. The system
must be capable of providing resolution better or equal to 1.0
atomic mass unit (amu) at 10 percent peak height. The system must
have a mass range from at least 7 to 240 amu that allows for the
application of the internal standard technique. For the measurement
of Pb, an
[[Page 40006]]
instrument with a collision or reaction cell is not required.
6.2 Ultrasonic Extraction Equipment
6.2.1 Heated ultrasonic bath capable of maintaining a
temperature of 80 [deg]C; VWR Model 750HT, 240W, or equivalent.
Ultrasonic bath must meet the following performance criteria:
1. Cut a strip of aluminum foil almost the width of the tank and
double the depth.
2. Turn the ultrasonic bath on and lower the foil into the bath
vertically until almost touching the bottom of the tank and hold for
10 seconds.
3. Remove the foil from the tank and observe the distribution of
perforations and small pin prick holes. The indentations should be
fine and evenly distributed. The even distribution of indentations
indicates the ultrasonic bath is acceptable for use.
6.2.2 Laboratory centrifuge, Beckman GS-6, or equivalent.
6.2.3 Vortex mixer, VWR Signature Digital Vortex Mixer, VWR
Catalog No. 14005-824, or equivalent.
6.3 Hot block extraction equipment
6.3.1 Hot block digester, SCP Science DigiPrep Model MS, No.
010-500-205 block digester capable of maintaining a temperature of
95 [deg]C, or equivalent.
6.4 Materials and Supplies
Argon gas supply, 99.99 percent purity or better.
National Welders Microbulk, or equivalent.
Plastic digestion tubes with threaded caps for
extraction and storage, SCP Science DigiTUBE[supreg] Item No. 010-
500-063, or equivalent.
Disposable polypropylene ribbed watch glasses (for
heated block extraction), SCP Science Item No. 010-500-081, or
equivalent.
Pipette, Rainin EDP2, 100 [mu]L, 1 percent
accuracy, <=1 percent RSD (precision), with disposable tips, or
equivalent.
Pipette, Rainin EDP2, 1000 [mu]L, 1
percent accuracy, <=1 percent RSD (precision), with disposable tips,
or equivalent.
Pipette, Rainin EDP2, 1-10 mL, 1 percent
accuracy, <=1 percent RSD (precision), with disposable tips, or
equivalent.
Pipette, Thermo Lab Systems, 5 mL, 1
percent accuracy, <=1 percent RSD (precision), with disposable tips,
or equivalent.
Plastic tweezer, VWR Catalog No. 89026-420, or
equivalent.
Laboratory marker.
Ceramic knife, Kyocera LK-25, and non-metal ruler or
other suitable cutting tools for making straight cuts for accurately
measured strips.
Blank labels or labeling tape, VWR Catalog No. 36425-
045, or equivalent.
Graduated cylinder, 1 L, VWR 89000-260, or equivalent.
Volumetric flask, Class A, 1 L, VWR Catalog No. 89025-
778, or equivalent.
Millipore Element deionized water system, or
equivalent, capable of generating water with a resistivity of >=17.9
M[Omega]-cm).
Disposable syringes, 10-mL, with 0.45 micron filters
(must be Pb-free).
Plastic or PTFE wash bottles.
Glassware, Class A--volumetric flasks, pipettes, and
graduated cylinders.
Glass fiber, quartz, or PTFE filters from the same
filter manufacturer and lot used for sample collection for use in
the determination of the MDL and for laboratory blanks.
7.0 Reagents and Standards
7.1 Reagent--or trace metals-grade chemicals must be used in all
tests. Unless otherwise indicated, it is intended that all reagents
conform to the specifications of the Committee on Analytical
Reagents of the American Chemical Society, where such specifications
are available.
7.2 Concentrated nitric acid, 67-70 percent, SCP Science Catalog
No. 250-037-177, or equivalent.
7.3 Concentrated hydrochloric acid (for the ultrasonic
extraction method), 33-36 percent, SCP Science Catalog No. 250-037-
175, or equivalent.
7.4 Deionized water--All references to deionized water in the
method refer to deionized water with a resistivity >=17.9 M[Omega]-
cm.
7.5 Standard stock solutions may be commercially purchased for
each element or as a multi-element mix. Internal standards may be
purchased as a mixed multi-element solution. The manufacturer's
expiration date and storage conditions must be adhered to.
7.5.1 Lead standard, 1000 [mu]g/mL, NIST traceable, commercially
available with certificate of analysis. High Purity Standards
Catalog No. 100028-1, or equivalent.
7.5.2 Indium (In) standard, 1000 [mu]g/mL, NIST traceable,
commercially available with certificate of analysis. High Purity
Standards Catalog No. 100024-1, or equivalent.
7.5.3 Bismuth (Bi) standard, 1000 [mu]g/mL, NIST traceable,
commercially available with certificate of analysis. High Purity
Standards Catalog No. 100006-1, or equivalent.
7.5.4 Holmium (Ho) standard, 1000 [mu]g/mL, NIST traceable,
commercially available with certificate of analysis. High Purity
Standards Catalog No. 100023-1, or equivalent.
7.5.5 Second source lead standard, 1000 [mu]g/mL, NIST
traceable, commercially available with certificate of analysis. Must
be from a different vendor or lot than the standard described in
7.5.1. Inorganic Ventures Catalog No. CGPB-1, or equivalent.
7.5.6 Standard Reference Materials, NIST SRM 2583, 2586, 2587 or
1648, or equivalent.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Certificates of Analysis for these SRMs can be found at:
https://www.nist.gov/srm/index.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: The In, Bi, and Ho internal standards may also be
purchased as 10 [micro]g/mL standards. Calibration standards are
prepared by diluting stock standards to the appropriate levels in
the same acid concentrations as in the final sample volume. The
typical range for calibration standards is 0.001 to 2.00 [micro]g/
mL. At a minimum, the curve must contain a blank and five Pb
containing calibration standards. The calibration standards are
stored at ambient laboratory temperature. Calibration standards must
be prepared weekly and verified against a freshly prepared ICV using
a NIST-traceable source different from the calibration standards.
7.6 Internal standards may be added to the test solution or by
on-line addition. The nominal concentration for an internal standard
is 0.010 [micro]g/mL (10 ppb). Bismuth (Bi) or holmium (Ho) are the
preferred internal standards for Pb, but indium (In) may be used in
the event the sample contains Bi and high recoveries are observed.
7.7 Three laboratory blank solutions are required for analysis:
(1) The calibration blank is used in the construction of the
calibration curve and as a periodic check of system cleanliness (ICB
and CCB); (2) the reagent blank (RB) is carried through the
extraction process to assess possible contamination; and (3) the
rinse blank is run between samples to clean the sample introduction
system. If RBs or laboratory blanks yield results above the
detection limit, the source of contamination must be identified.
Screening of labware and reagents is addressed in Section 4.1.
7.7.1 The calibration blank is prepared in the same acid matrix
as the calibration standards and samples and contains all internal
standards used in the analysis.
7.7.2 The RB contains all reagents used in the extraction and is
carried through the extraction procedure at the same time as the
samples.
7.7.3 The rinse blank is a solution of 1 to 2 percent
HNO3 (v/v) in reagent grade water. A sufficient volume
should be prepared to flush the system between all standards and
samples analyzed.
7.7.4 The EPA currently provides glass fiber, quartz, and PTFE
filters to air monitoring agencies as requested annually. As part of
the procurement process, these filters are tested for acceptance by
the EPA. The current acceptance criteria for glass fiber and quartz
filters is 15 [micro]g per filter or 0.0075 [micro]g/m\3\ using a
nominal sample volume of 2000 m\3\ and 4.8 ng/cm\2\ or 0.0024
[micro]g/m\3\ for PTFE filters using a nominal sample volume of 24
m\3\. Acceptance test results for filters obtained by the EPA are
typically well below the criterion specified and also below the
recently revised Pb method performance detection limit of 0.0075
[micro]g/m\3\; therefore, blank subtraction should not be performed.
7.7.5 If filters are not provided by the EPA for sample
collection and analysis, filter lot blanks should be analyzed for Pb
content. For large filter lots (>500 filters), randomly select 20 to
30 filters from the lot and analyze the filter or filter strips for
Pb. For smaller filter lots, a lesser number of filters can be
analyzed. Glass, quartz and PTFE filters must not have levels of Pb
above the criteria specified in section 7.7.4 and, therefore, blank
correction should not be performed. If acceptance testing shows
levels of Pb above the criteria in Section 7.7.4, corrective action
must be taken to reduce the levels before proceeding.
7.8 The Initial Calibration Verification (ICV), Lower Level
Calibration Verification (LLCV), and Continuing Calibration
Verification (CCV) solutions are prepared from a different Pb source
than the calibration curve standards and at a concentration that is
either at or below the midpoint on the calibration curve, but within
the calibration range. Both are prepared in the same acid matrix as
the calibration standards. Note that the same solution may be used
for both the ICV and CCV. The ICV/
[[Page 40007]]
CCV and LLCV solutions must be prepared fresh daily.
7.9 Tuning Solution. Prepare a tuning solution according to the
instrument manufacturer's recommendations. This solution will be
used to verify the mass calibration and resolution of the
instrument.
8.0 Quality Control (QC)
8.1 Standard QC practices shall be employed to assess the
validity of the data generated, including: MDL, RB, duplicate
samples, spiked samples, serial dilutions, ICV, CCV, LLCV, ICB, CCB,
and SRMs/CRMs.
8.2 MDLs must be calculated in accordance with 40 CFR part 136,
Appendix B. RBs with low-level standard spikes are used to estimate
the MDL. The low-level standard spike is added to at least 7
individual filter strips and then carried through the entire
extraction procedure. This will result in at least 7 individual
samples to be used for the MDL. The recommended range for spiking
the strips is 1 to 5 times the estimated MDL.
8.3 For each batch of samples, one RB and one reagent blank
spike (RBS) that is spiked at the same level as the sample spike
(see Section 8.6) must be prepared and carried throughout the entire
process. The results of the RB must be below 0.001 [micro]g/mL. The
recovery for the RBS must be within 20 percent of the
expected value. If the RB yields a result above 0.001 [micro]g/mL,
the source of contamination must be identified and the extraction
and analysis repeated. Reagents and labware must be suspected as
sources of contamination. Screening of reagents and labware is
addressed in Section 4.1.
8.4 Any samples that exceed the highest calibration standard
must be diluted and rerun so that the concentration falls within the
curve. The minimum dilution will be 1 to 5 with matrix matched acid
solution.
8.5 The internal standard response must be monitored during the
analysis. If the internal standard response falls below 70 percent
or rises above 120 percent of expected due to possible matrix
effects, the sample must be diluted and reanalyzed. The minimum
dilution will be 1 to 5 with matrix matched acid solution. If the
first dilution does not correct the problem, additional dilutions
must be run until the internal standard falls within the specified
range.
8.6 For every batch of samples prepared, there must be one
duplicate and one spike sample prepared. The spike added is to be at
a level that falls within the calibration curve, normally the
midpoint of the curve. The initial plus duplicate sample must yield
a relative percent difference <= 20 percent. The spike must be
within 20 percent of the expected value.
8.7 For each batch of samples, one extract must be diluted five-
fold and analyzed. The corrected dilution result must be within
10 percent of the undiluted result. The sample chosen
for the serial dilution shall have a concentration at or above 10X
the lowest standard in the curve to ensure the diluted value falls
within the curve. If the serial dilution fails, chemical or physical
interference should be suspected.
8.8 ICB, ICV, LLCV, CCB and CCV samples are to be run as shown
in the following table.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance
Sample Frequency specification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICB....................... Prior to first sample Less than 0.001 [mu]g/
mL.
ICV....................... Prior to first sample Within 90 to 110
percent of the
expected value.
LLCV...................... Daily, before first 10
sample and after percent of the
last sample. expected value.
CCB....................... After every 10 Less than 0.001 [mu]g/
extracted samples. mL.
CCV....................... After every 10 Within 90-110 percent
extracted samples. of the expected
value.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If any of these QC samples fails to meet specifications, the
source of the unacceptable performance must be determined, the
problem corrected, and any samples not bracketed by passing QC
samples must be reanalyzed.
8.9 For each batch of samples, one certified reference material
(CRM) must be combined with a blank filter strip and carried through
the entire extraction procedure. The result must be within 10 percent of the expected value.
8.10 For each run, a LLCV must be analyzed. The LLCV must be
prepared at a concentration not more than three times the lowest
calibration standard and at a concentration not used in the
calibration curve. The LLCV is used to assess performance at the low
end of the curve. If the LLCV fails (10 percent of the
expected value) the run must be terminated, the problem corrected,
the instrument recalibrated, and the analysis repeated.
8.11 Pipettes used for volumetric transfer must have the
calibration checked at least once every 6 months and pass 1 percent accuracy and <= 1 percent RSD (precision) based on
five replicate readings. The pipettes must be checked weekly for
accuracy with a single replicate. Any pipette that does not meet
1 percent accuracy on the weekly check must be removed
from service, repaired, and pass a full calibration check before
use.
8.12 Samples with physical deformities are not quantitatively
analyzable. The analyst should visually check filters prior to
proceeding with preparation for holes, tears, or non-uniform deposit
which would prevent representative sampling. Document any
deformities and qualify the data with flags appropriately. Care must
be taken to protect filters from contamination. Filters must be kept
covered prior to sample preparation.
9.0 ICP MS Calibration
Follow the instrument manufacturer's instructions for the
routine maintenance, cleaning, and ignition procedures for the
specific ICP-MS instrument being used.
9.1 Ignite the plasma and wait for at least one half hour for
the instrument to warm up before beginning any pre-analysis steps.
9.2 For the Thermo X-Series with Xt cones, aspirate a 10 ng/mL
tuning solution containing In, Bi, and Ce (Cerium). Monitor the
intensities of In, Bi, Ce, and CeO (Cerium oxide) and adjust the
instrument settings to achieve the highest In and Bi counts while
minimizing the CeO/Ce oxide ratio. For other instruments, follow the
manufacturer's recommended practice. Tune to meet the instrument
manufacturer's specifications. After tuning, place the sample
aspiration probe into a 2 percent HNO3 rinse solution for
at least 5 minutes to flush the system.
9.3 Aspirate a 5 ng/mL solution containing Co, In, and Bi to
perform a daily instrument stability check. Run 10 replicates of the
solution. The percent RSD for the replicates must be less than 3
percent at all masses. If the percent RSD is greater than 3 percent,
the sample introduction system, pump tubing, and tune should be
examined, and the analysis repeated. Place the sample aspiration
probe into a 2 percent HNO3 rinse solution for at least 5
minutes to flush the system.
9.4 Load the calibration standards in the autosampler and
analyze using the same method parameters that will be used to
analyze samples. The curve must include one blank and at least 5 Pb-
containing calibration standards. The correlation coefficient must
be at least 0.998 for the curve to be accepted. The lowest standard
must recover 15 percent of the expected value and the
remaining standards must recover 10 percent of the
expected value to be accepted.
9.5 Immediately after the calibration curve is completed,
analyze an ICV and an ICB. The ICV must be prepared from a different
source of Pb than the calibration standards. The ICV must recover
90-110 percent of the expected value for the run to continue. The
ICB must be less than 0.001 [micro]g/mL. If either the ICV or the
ICB fails, the run must be terminated, the problem identified and
corrected, and the analysis re-started.
9.6 A LLCV, CCV and a CCB must be run after the ICV and ICB. A
CCV and CCB must be run at a frequency of not less than every 10
extracted samples. A typical analytical run sequence would be:
Calibration blank, Calibration standards, ICV, ICB, LLCV, CCV, CCB,
Extracts 1-10, CCV, CCB, Extracts 11-20, CCV, CCB, Extracts 21-30,
CCV, CCB, LLCV, CCV, CCB. Extracts are any field sample or QC
samples that have been carried through the extraction process. The
CCV solution is prepared from a different source than the
calibration standards and may be the same as the ICV solution. The
LLCV must be within 10 percent of expected value. The
CCV value must be within 10 percent of expected for the
run to continue. The CCB must be less than 0.001 [mu]g/mL. If either
the CCV, LLCV, or CCB fails, the run must be terminated, the problem
identified and
[[Page 40008]]
corrected, and the analysis re-started from the last passing CCV/
LLCV/CCB set.
9.7 A LLCV, CCV, and CCB set must be run at the end of the
analysis. The LLCV must be within 30 percent of
expected value. If either the CCV, LLCV, or CCB fails, the run must
be terminated, the problem identified and corrected, and the
analysis re-started from the last passing CCV/LLCV/CCB set.
10.0 Heated Ultrasonic Filter Strip Extraction
All plasticware (e.g., Nalgene) and glassware used in the
extraction procedures is soaked in 1 percent HNO3 (v/v)
for at least 24 hours and rinsed with reagent water prior to use.
All mechanical pipettes used must be calibrated to 1
percent accuracy and <= 1 percent RSD at a minimum of once every 6
months.
10.1 Sample Preparation--Heated Ultrasonic Bath
10.1.1 Extraction solution (1.03M HNO3 + 2.23M HCl).
Prepare by adding 500 mL of deionized water to a 1000 mL flask,
adding 64.4 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 182 mL of
concentrated HCl, shaking to mix, allowing solution to cool,
diluting to volume with reagent water, and inverting several times
to mix. Extraction solution must be prepared at least weekly.
10.1.2 Use a ceramic knife and non-metal ruler, or other cutting
device that will not contaminate the filter with Pb. Cut a \3/4\
inch X 8 inch strip from the glass fiber or quartz filter by cutting
a strip from the edge of the filter where it has been folded along
the 10 inch side at least 1 inch from the right or left side to
avoid the un-sampled area covered by the filter holder. The filters
must be carefully handled to avoid dislodging deposits.
10.1.3 Using plastic tweezers, roll the filter strip up in a
coil and place the rolled strip in the bottom of a labeled 50 mL
extraction tube. In a fume hood, add 15.00 0.15 mL of
the extraction solution (see Section 10.1.1) using a calibrated
mechanical pipette. Ensure that the extraction solution completely
covers the filter strip.
10.1.4 Loosely cap the 50 mL extraction tube and place it
upright in a plastic rack. When all samples have been prepared,
place the racks in an uncovered heated ultrasonic water bath that
has been preheated to 80 5[deg]C and ensure that the
water level in the ultrasonic is above the level of the extraction
solution in the tubes but well below the level of the extraction
tube caps to avoid contamination. Start the ultrasonic bath and
allow the unit to run for 1 hour 5 minutes at 80 5[deg]C.
10.1.5 Remove the rack(s) from the ultrasonic bath and allow the
racks to cool.
10.1.6 Add 25.00 0.25 mL of D.I. water with a
calibrated mechanical pipette to bring the sample to a final volume
of 40.0 0.4 mL. Tightly cap the tubes, and vortex mix
or shake vigorously. Place the extraction tubes in an appropriate
holder and centrifuge for 20 minutes at 2500 revolutions per minute
(RPM).
CAUTION--Make sure that the centrifuge holder has a flat bottom
to support the flat bottomed extraction tubes.
10.1.7 Pour an aliquot of the solution into an autosampler vial
for ICP-MS analysis to avoid the potential for contamination. Do not
pipette an aliquot of solution into the autosampler vial.
10.1.8 Decant the extract to a clean tube, cap tightly, and
store the sample extract at ambient laboratory temperature. Extracts
may be stored for up to 6 months from the date of extraction.
10.2 47 mm PTFE Filter Extraction--Heated Ultrasonic Bath
10.2.1 Extraction solution (1.03M HNO3 + 2.23M HCl).
Prepare by adding 500 mL of D.I. water to a 1000mL flask, adding
64.4 mL of concentrated HNO3 and 182 mL of concentrated
HCl, shaking to mix, allowing solution to cool, diluting to volume
with reagent water, and inverting several times to mix. Extraction
solution must be prepared at least weekly.
10.2.2 Using plastic tweezers, bend the PTFE filter into a U-
shape and insert the filter into a labeled 50 mL extraction tube
with the particle loaded side facing the center of the tube. Gently
push the filter to the bottom of the extraction tube. In a fume
hood, add 25.00 0.15 mL of the extraction solution (see
Section 10.2.1) using a calibrated mechanical pipette. Ensure that
the extraction solution completely covers the filter.
10.2.3 Loosely cap the 50 mL extraction tube and place it
upright in a plastic rack. When all samples have been prepared,
place the racks in an uncovered heated ultrasonic water bath that
has been preheated to 80 5[deg]C and ensure that the
water level in the ultrasonic is above the level of the extraction
solution in the tubes, but well below the level of the extraction
tube caps to avoid contamination. Start the ultrasonic bath and
allow the unit to run for 1 hour 5 minutes at 80 5[deg]C.
10.2.4 Remove the rack(s) from the ultrasonic bath and allow the
racks to cool.
10.2.5 Add 25.00 0.25 mL of D.I. water with a
calibrated mechanical pipette to bring the sample to a final volume
of 50.0 0.4 mL. Tightly cap the tubes, and vortex mix
or shake vigorously. Allow samples to stand for one hour to allow
complete diffusion of the extracted Pb. The sample is now ready for
analysis.
Note: Although PTFE filters have only been extracted using the
ultrasonic extraction procedure in the development of this FRM, PTFE
filters are inert and have very low Pb content. No issues are
expected with the extraction of PTFE filters using the heated block
digestion method. However, prior to using PTFE filters in the heated
block extraction method, extraction method performance test using
CRMs must be done to confirm performance (see Section 8.9).
11.0 Hot Block Filter Strip Extraction
All plasticware (e.g., Nalgene) and glassware used in the
extraction procedures is soaked in 1 percent HNO3 for at
least 24 hours and rinsed with reagent water prior to use. All
mechanical pipettes used must be calibrated to 1 percent
accuracy and <= 1 percent RSD at a minimum of once every 6 months.
11.1 Sample Preparation--Hot Block Digestion
11.1.1 Extraction solution (1:19, v/v HNO3). Prepare
by adding 500 mL of D.I. water to a 1000 mL flask, adding 50 mL of
concentrated HNO3, shaking to mix, allowing solution to
cool, diluting to volume with reagent water, and inverting several
times to mix. The extraction solution must be prepared at least
weekly.
11.1.2 Use a ceramic knife and non-metal ruler, or other cutting
device that will not contaminate the filter with Pb. Cut a 1-inch X
8-inch strip from the glass fiber or quartz filter. Cut a strip from
the edge of the filter where it has been folded along the 10-inch
side at least 1 inch from the right or left side to avoid the un-
sampled area covered by the filter holder. The filters must be
carefully handled to avoid dislodging particle deposits.
11.1.3 Using plastic tweezers, roll the filter strip up in a
coil and place the rolled strip in the bottom of a labeled 50 mL
extraction tube. In a fume hood, add 20.0 0.15 mL of
the extraction solution (see Section 11.1.1) using a calibrated
mechanical pipette. Ensure that the extraction solution completely
covers the filter strip.
11.1.4 Place the extraction tube in the heated block digester
and cover with a disposable polyethylene ribbed watch glass. Heat at
95 5[deg]C for 1 hour and ensure that the sample does
not evaporate to dryness. For proper heating, adjust the temperature
control of the hot block such that an uncovered vessel containing 50
mL of water placed in the center of the hot block can be maintained
at a temperature approximately, but no higher than 85[ordm]C. Once
the vessel is covered with a ribbed watch glass, the temperature of
the water will increase to approximately 95[deg]C.
11.1.5 Remove the rack(s) from the heated block digester and
allow the samples to cool.
11.1.6 Bring the samples to a final volume of 50 mL with D.I.
water. Tightly cap the tubes, and vortex mix or shake vigorously for
at least 5 seconds. Set aside (with the filter strip in the tube)
for at least 30 minutes to allow the HNO3 trapped in the
filter to diffuse into the extraction solution.
11.1.7 Shake thoroughly (with the filter strip in the digestion
tube) and let settle for at least one hour. The sample is now ready
for analysis.
12.0 Measurement Procedure
12.1 Follow the instrument manufacturer's startup procedures for
the ICP-MS.
12.2 Set instrument parameters to the appropriate operating
conditions as presented in the instrument manufacturer's operating
manual and allow the instrument to warm up for at least 30 minutes.
12.3 Calibrate the instrument per Section 9.0 of this method.
12.4 Verify the instrument is suitable for analysis as defined
in Sections 9.2 and 9.3.
12.5 As directed in Section 8.0 of this method, analyze an ICV
and ICB immediately after the calibration curve followed by a LLCV,
then CCV and CCB. The acceptance requirements for these parameters
are presented in Section 8.8.
12.6 Analyze a CCV and a CCB after every 10 extracted samples.
12.7 Analyze a LLCV, CCV and CCB at the end of the analysis.
[[Page 40009]]
12.8 A typical sample run will include field samples, field
sample duplicates, spiked field sample extracts, serially diluted
samples, the set of QC samples listed in Section 8.8 above, and one
or more CRMs or SRMs.
12.9 Any samples that exceed the highest standard in the
calibration curve must be diluted and reanalyzed so that the diluted
concentration falls within the calibration curve.
13.0 Results
13.1 The filter results must be initially reported in [mu]g/mL
as analyzed. Any additional dilutions must be accounted for. The
internal standard recoveries must be included in the result
calculation; this is done by the ICP-MS software for most
commercially-available instruments. Final results should be reported
in [mu]g Pb/m\3\ to three significant figures as follows:
C = (([mu]g Pb/mL * Vf * A)* D))/Vs
Where:
C = Concentration, [mu]g Pb/m\3\
[mu]g Pb/mL = Lead concentration in solution
Vf = Total extraction solution volume
A = Area correction; \3/4\'' x 8'' strip = 5.25 in\2\ analyzed, A =
12.0 or 1'' x 8'' strip = 7 in\2\ analyzed, A = 9.0
D = dilution factor (if required)
Vs = Actual volume of air sampled
The calculation assumes the use of a standard 8-inch x 10-inch
TSP filter which has a sampled area of 9-inch x 7-inch (63.0 in\2\)
due to the \1/2\-inch filter holder border around the outer edge.
The \3/4\-inch x 8-inch strip has a sampled area of \3/4\-inch x 7-
inch (5.25 in\2\). The 1-inch x 8-inch strip has a sampled area of
1-inch x 7-inch (7.0 in\2\). If filter lot blanks are provided for
analysis, refer to Section 7.7.5 of this method for guidance on
testing.
14.0 Method Performance
Information in this section is an example of typical performance
results achieved by this method. Actual performance must be
demonstrated by each individual laboratory and instrument.
14.1 Performance data have been collected to estimate MDLs for
this method. MDLs were determined in accordance with 40 CFR 136,
Appendix B. MDLs were estimated for glass fiber, quartz, and PTFE
filters using seven reagent/filter blank solutions spiked with low
level Pb at three times the estimated MDL of 0.001 [mu]g/mL. Tables
1, 3, and 5 shows the MDLs estimated using both the ultrasonic and
hot block extraction methods for glass fiber and quartz filters and
the ultrasonic method for PTFE filters. The MDLs are well below the
EPA requirement of five percent of the current Pb NAAQS or 0.0075
[mu]g/m\3\. These MDLs are provided to demonstrate the adequacy of
the method's performance for Pb in TSP. Each laboratory using this
method should determine MDLs in their laboratory and verify them
annually. It is recommended that laboratories also perform the
optional iterative procedure in 40 CFR 136, Appendix B to verify the
reasonableness of the estimated MDL and subsequent MDL
determinations.
14.2 Extraction method recovery tests with glass fiber and
quartz filter strips, and PTFE filters spiked with NIST SRMs were
performed using the ultrasonic/HNO3 and HCl filter
extraction methods and measurement of the dissolved Pb with ICP-MS.
Tables 2, 4, and 6 show recoveries obtained with these SRM. The
recoveries for all SRMs were >=90 percent at the 95 percent
confidence level.
Table 1--Method Detection Limits Determined by Analysis of Reagent/Glass
Fiber Filter Blanks Spiked With Low-level Pb Solution
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic Hotblock
extraction extraction
method method
-------------------------
[mu]g/m\3\* [mu]g/m\3\*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
n = 1......................................... 0.0000702 0.000533
n = 2......................................... 0.0000715 0.000482
n = 3......................................... 0.0000611 0.000509
n = 4......................................... 0.0000587 0.000427
n = 5......................................... 0.0000608 0.000449
n = 6......................................... 0.0000607 0.000539
n = 7......................................... 0.0000616 0.000481
Average....................................... 0.0000635 0.000489
Standard Deviation............................ 0.0000051 0.000042
MDL**......................................... 0.0000161 0.000131
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Assumes 2000 m\3\ of air sampled.
** MDL is 3.143 times the standard deviation of the results for seven
sample replicates analyzed.
Table 2--Recoveries of Lead From NIST SRMs Spiked Onto Glass Fiber Filters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery, ICP-MS, (percent)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Extraction method NIST 1547 NIST 2582
plant NIST 2709 soil NIST 2583 dust paint
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic Bath................................. 100 4 minus> 1 minus> 8 minus> 0
Block Digestion................................. 92 7 minus> 3 minus> 4 minus> 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Method Detection Limits Determined by Analysis of Reagent/
Quartz Filter Blanks Spiked With Low-level Pb Solution
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic Hotblock
extraction extraction
method method
-------------------------
[mu]g/m\3\* [mu]g/m\3\*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
n = 1......................................... 0.000533 0.000274
n = 2......................................... 0.000552 0.000271
n = 3......................................... 0.000534 0.000281
n = 4......................................... 0.000684 0.000269
[[Page 40010]]
n = 5......................................... 0.000532 0.000278
n = 6......................................... 0.000532 0.000272
n = 7......................................... 0.000552 0.000261
Average....................................... 0.000560 0.000272
Standard Deviation............................ 0.000055 0.000007
MDL**......................................... 0.000174 0.000021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Assumes 2000 m\3\ of air sampled.
** MDL is 3.143 times the standard deviation of the results for seven
sample replicates analyzed.
Table 4--Recoveries of Lead From NIST SRMs Spiked Onto Quartz Fiber Filters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery, ICP-MS, (percent)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Extraction method NIST 1547 NIST 2582
plant NIST 2709 soil NIST 2583 dust paint
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic Bath................................. 101 6 minus> 1 minus> 5 minus> 1
Block Digestion................................. 106 3 minus> 3 minus> 6 minus> 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5--Method Detection Limits Determined by Analysis of Reagent/PTFE
Filter Blanks Spiked With Low-Level Pb Solution
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic
extraction
method
---------------
[mu]g/m\3\*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
n = 1................................................... 0.001775
n = 2................................................... 0.001812
n = 3................................................... 0.001773
n = 4................................................... 0.001792
n = 5................................................... 0.001712
n = 6................................................... 0.001767
n = 7................................................... 0.001778
Average................................................. 0.001773
Standard Deviation...................................... 0.000031
MDL**................................................... 0.000097
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Assumes 24 m\3\ of air sampled.
** MDL is 3.143 times the standard deviation of the results for seven
sample replicates analyzed.
Table 6--Recoveries of Lead From NIST SRMs Spiked Onto PTFE Filters
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recovery, ICP-MS, (percent)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Extraction method NIST 1547 NIST 2582
plant NIST 2709 soil NIST 2583 dust paint
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic Bath................................. 104 5 minus> 1 minus> 11 minus> 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.0 Pollution Prevention
15.1 Pollution prevention encompasses any technique that reduces
or eliminates the quantity and/or toxicity of waste at the point of
generation. Numerous opportunities for pollution prevention exist in
laboratory operations. Whenever feasible, laboratory personnel
should use pollution prevention techniques to address their waste
generation. The sources of pollution generated with this procedure
are waste acid extracts and Pb-containing solutions.
15.2 For information about pollution prevention that may be
applicable to laboratories and research institutions, consult Less
is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste Reduction,
available from the American Chemical Society's Department of
Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20036, www.acs.org.
16.0 Waste Management
16.1 Laboratory waste management practices must be conducted
consistent with all applicable rules and regulations. Laboratories
are urged to protect air, water, and land by minimizing all releases
from hood and bench operations, complying with the letter and spirit
of any sewer and discharge permits and regulations, and by complying
with all solid and hazardous waste regulation. For further
information on waste management, consult The Waste Management Manual
for Laboratory Personnel available from the American Chemical
Society listed in Section 15.2 of this method.
[[Page 40011]]
16.2 Waste HNO3, HCl, and solutions containing these
reagents and/or Pb must be placed in labeled bottles and delivered
to a commercial firm that specializes in removal of hazardous waste.
17.0 References
FACDQ (2007). Report of the Federal Advisory Committee on Detection
and Quantitation Approaches and Uses in Clean Water Act Programs,
submitted to the U.S. EPA December 2007. Available: https://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/det/upload/final-report-200712.pdf.
Rice J (2013). Results from the Development of a New Federal
Reference Method (FRM) for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate (TSP)
Matter. Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0210.
U.S. EPA (2007). Method 6020A--Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass
Spectrometry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Revision 1,
February 2007. Available: https://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/6020a.pdf.
U.S. EPA (2011). A Laboratory Study of Procedures Evaluated by the
Federal Advisory Committee on Detection and Quantitation Approaches
and Uses in Clean Water Act Programs. December 2011. Available:
https://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/det/upload/fac_report_2009.pdf.
[FR Doc. 2013-15880 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P