Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; District of Columbia; Control of Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator Units, 40015-40017 [2013-15874]
Download as PDF
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 3,
2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. Parties with objections to this
direct final rule are encouraged to file a
comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this
action published in the proposed rules
section of today’s Federal Register,
rather than file an immediate petition
for judicial review of this direct final
rule, so that EPA can withdraw this
direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking.
This action may not be challenged later
in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Emissions Reporting,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
Incorporation by reference, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 6, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.720 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(196) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.720
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(196) On April 11, 2013, Illinois
submitted a revision to 35 IAC Part 254,
Annual Emissions Report. The revision
amends the applicability provisions as
they relate to greenhouse gases.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
Illinois Administrative Code Title 35:
Environmental Protection, Subtitle B:
Air Pollution; Chapter II: Environmental
Protection Agency; Part 254: Annual
Emission Report, Section 254.102:
Applicability, effective April 20, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2013–15611 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0434; FRL–9829–6]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Air Quality Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; District of
Columbia; Control of Emissions From
Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious
Waste Incinerator Units
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action to approve a negative declaration
for hospital/medical/infectious waste
incinerator (HMIWI) units within the
District of Columbia. This negative
declaration certifies that HMIWI units
subject to the requirements of sections
111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) do not exist within the
jurisdictional boundaries of the District
Department of the Environment (DDOE).
EPA is accepting the negative
declaration in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40015
This rule is effective on
September 3, 2013 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
written comment by August 2, 2013. If
EPA receives such comments, it will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
and inform the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2013–0434 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: cox.kathleen@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0434,
Kathleen Cox, Associate Director, Office
of Permits and Air Toxics, Mailcode
3AP10, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2013–
0434. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
40016
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the submittal are available at
the District of Columbia Department of
the Environment, Air Quality Division,
1200 1st Street NE., Fifth Floor,
Washington, DC 20002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Gordon, (215) 814–2039, or by
email at gordon.mike@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA
require states to submit plans to control
certain pollutants (designated
pollutants) at existing solid waste
combustor facilities (designated
facilities) whenever standards of
performance have been established
under section 111(b) for new sources of
the same type, and EPA has established
emission guidelines (EG) for such
existing sources. A designated pollutant
is any pollutant for which no air quality
criteria have been issued, and which is
not included on a list published under
section 108(a) or section 112(b)(1)(A) of
the CAA, but emissions of which are
subject to a standard of performance for
new stationary sources.
On October 6, 2009 (74 FR 51368),
EPA promulgated HMIWI unit new
source performance standards, 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Ec, and emission
guidelines, subpart Ce. These
regulations were amended in an April 4,
2011 final rule (76 FR 18407).
The designated facilities to which the
EG apply are existing HMIWI units that:
(1) Commenced construction on or
before June 20, 1996, or for which
modification was commenced on or
before March 16, 1998; or (2)
commenced construction after June 20,
1996 but no later than December 1,
2008, or for which modification
commenced after March 16, 1998 but no
later than April 6, 2010, with limited
exceptions as provided in paragraphs 40
CFR 60.32e(b) through (h).
Subpart B of 40 CFR part 60
establishes procedures to be followed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
and requirements to be met in the
development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated
pollutants. Also, 40 CFR part 62
provides the procedural framework for
the submission of these plans. When
designated facilities are located in a
state, the state must then develop and
submit a plan for the control of the
designated pollutant. However, 40 CFR
60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there
are no existing sources of the designated
pollutant in the state, the state may
submit a letter of certification to that
effect (i.e., negative declaration) in lieu
of a plan. The negative declaration
exempts the state from the requirements
of subpart B that require the submittal
of a 111(d)/129 plan.
II. Final EPA Action
The DDOE has determined that there
are no HMIWI units subject to CAA
111(d)/129 requirements in their
respective air pollution control
jurisdiction. Accordingly, DDOE
submitted a negative declaration letter
to EPA on July 26, 2012.
In this direct final action, EPA is
amending part 62 to reflect receipt of
the negative declaration letter from
DDOE. EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal because EPA
views this as a noncontroversial
amendment and anticipates no adverse
comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed
Rules’’ section of today’s Federal
Register, EPA is publishing a separate
document that will serve as the proposal
to approve the SIP revision if adverse
comments are filed. This rule will be
effective on September 3, 2013 without
further notice unless EPA receives
adverse comment by August 2, 2013. If
EPA receives adverse comment, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22, 2001). This action merely notifies
the public of EPA receipt of a negative
declaration from an air pollution control
agency without any existing HMIWI
units in their jurisdiction. This action
imposes no requirements. Accordingly,
EPA certifies that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This action also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves the negative declaration for
existing HMIWI units from the DDOE
and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This action also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
With regard to negative declarations
for designated facilities received by EPA
from states, EPA’s role is to notify the
public of the receipt of such negative
declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62
accordingly. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to approve or disapprove a CAA section
111(d)/129 plan negative declaration
submission for failure to use VCS. It
would thus be inconsistent with
applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a CAA section 111(d)/129 negative
declaration, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 3, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking.
This action approving the DDOE’s
negative declaration for HMIWI units
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum,
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental
relations, Paper and paper products
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
industry, Phosphate, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Sulfur acid plants, Waste
treatment and disposal.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart J—District of Columbia
2. Section 62.2150 is amended by
designating the existing paragraph as (a)
and adding paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 62.2150 Identification of plan—negative
declaration.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Letter from the District Department
of the Environment, submitted to EPA
on July 26, 2012, certifying that there
are no known existing HMIWI units in
the District of Columbia.
40017
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0303, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Nollen, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–7390; email address:
nollen.laura@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–15874 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
I. General Information
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
A. Does this action apply to me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0303; FRL–9391–7]
Ethalfluralin; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of ethalfluralin
in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A and
sunflower subgroup 20B. This
regulation additionally removes the
established tolerances in or on mustard,
seed; rapeseed, seed; safflower, seed;
and sunflower, seed, as they will be
superseded by the tolerances
established by this final rule.
Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR–4) requested these tolerances under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July
3, 2013. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 3, 2013, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40015-40017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15874]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0434; FRL-9829-6]
Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; District of Columbia; Control of
Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator
Units
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve a negative
declaration for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator (HMIWI)
units within the District of Columbia. This negative declaration
certifies that HMIWI units subject to the requirements of sections
111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not exist within the
jurisdictional boundaries of the District Department of the Environment
(DDOE). EPA is accepting the negative declaration in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on September 3, 2013 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by August 2, 2013.
If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2013-0434 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: cox.kathleen@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0434, Kathleen Cox, Associate Director,
Office of Permits and Air Toxics, Mailcode 3AP10, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2013-0434. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
[[Page 40016]]
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the submittal are
available at the District of Columbia Department of the Environment,
Air Quality Division, 1200 1st Street NE., Fifth Floor, Washington, DC
20002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Gordon, (215) 814-2039, or by
email at gordon.mike@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans
to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid
waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards
of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new
sources of the same type, and EPA has established emission guidelines
(EG) for such existing sources. A designated pollutant is any pollutant
for which no air quality criteria have been issued, and which is not
included on a list published under section 108(a) or section
112(b)(1)(A) of the CAA, but emissions of which are subject to a
standard of performance for new stationary sources.
On October 6, 2009 (74 FR 51368), EPA promulgated HMIWI unit new
source performance standards, 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ec, and emission
guidelines, subpart Ce. These regulations were amended in an April 4,
2011 final rule (76 FR 18407).
The designated facilities to which the EG apply are existing HMIWI
units that: (1) Commenced construction on or before June 20, 1996, or
for which modification was commenced on or before March 16, 1998; or
(2) commenced construction after June 20, 1996 but no later than
December 1, 2008, or for which modification commenced after March 16,
1998 but no later than April 6, 2010, with limited exceptions as
provided in paragraphs 40 CFR 60.32e(b) through (h).
Subpart B of 40 CFR part 60 establishes procedures to be followed
and requirements to be met in the development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated pollutants. Also, 40 CFR part 62
provides the procedural framework for the submission of these plans.
When designated facilities are located in a state, the state must then
develop and submit a plan for the control of the designated pollutant.
However, 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there are no
existing sources of the designated pollutant in the state, the state
may submit a letter of certification to that effect (i.e., negative
declaration) in lieu of a plan. The negative declaration exempts the
state from the requirements of subpart B that require the submittal of
a 111(d)/129 plan.
II. Final EPA Action
The DDOE has determined that there are no HMIWI units subject to
CAA 111(d)/129 requirements in their respective air pollution control
jurisdiction. Accordingly, DDOE submitted a negative declaration letter
to EPA on July 26, 2012.
In this direct final action, EPA is amending part 62 to reflect
receipt of the negative declaration letter from DDOE. EPA is publishing
this rule without prior proposal because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comment. However,
in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, EPA is
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will
be effective on September 3, 2013 without further notice unless EPA
receives adverse comment by August 2, 2013. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely notifies the public of EPA receipt of a negative declaration
from an air pollution control agency without any existing HMIWI units
in their jurisdiction. This action imposes no requirements.
Accordingly, EPA certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This action also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves the negative declaration for existing HMIWI
units from the DDOE and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
With regard to negative declarations for designated facilities
received by EPA from states, EPA's role is to notify the public of the
receipt of such negative declarations and revise 40 CFR part 62
accordingly. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to approve or disapprove a CAA section 111(d)/129
plan negative declaration submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a CAA
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d)/129 negative declaration that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
[[Page 40017]]
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This action
does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 3, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking.
This action approving the DDOE's negative declaration for HMIWI
units may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride,
Intergovernmental relations, Paper and paper products industry,
Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Sulfur acid plants, Waste treatment and disposal.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart J--District of Columbia
0
2. Section 62.2150 is amended by designating the existing paragraph as
(a) and adding paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 62.2150 Identification of plan--negative declaration.
* * * * *
(b) Letter from the District Department of the Environment,
submitted to EPA on July 26, 2012, certifying that there are no known
existing HMIWI units in the District of Columbia.
[FR Doc. 2013-15874 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P