Ethalfluralin; Pesticide Tolerances, 40017-40020 [2013-15710]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This action does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 3, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking.
This action approving the DDOE’s
negative declaration for HMIWI units
may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum,
Fertilizers, Fluoride, Intergovernmental
relations, Paper and paper products
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
industry, Phosphate, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Sulfur acid plants, Waste
treatment and disposal.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:
PART 62—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart J—District of Columbia
2. Section 62.2150 is amended by
designating the existing paragraph as (a)
and adding paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
■
§ 62.2150 Identification of plan—negative
declaration.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Letter from the District Department
of the Environment, submitted to EPA
on July 26, 2012, certifying that there
are no known existing HMIWI units in
the District of Columbia.
40017
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0303, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Nollen, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–7390; email address:
nollen.laura@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2013–15874 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
I. General Information
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
A. Does this action apply to me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0303; FRL–9391–7]
Ethalfluralin; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of ethalfluralin
in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A and
sunflower subgroup 20B. This
regulation additionally removes the
established tolerances in or on mustard,
seed; rapeseed, seed; safflower, seed;
and sunflower, seed, as they will be
superseded by the tolerances
established by this final rule.
Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR–4) requested these tolerances under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July
3, 2013. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 3, 2013, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
40018
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2012–0303 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before September 3, 2013. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2012–0303, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of July 25,
2012 (77 FR 43562) (FRL–9353–6), EPA
issued a document pursuant to FFDCA
section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3),
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 2E8007) by IR–4, 500
College Rd. East, Suite 201 W.,
Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
requested that 40 CFR 180.416 be
amended by establishing tolerances for
residues of the herbicide ethalfluralin,
N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine,
in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A and
sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 parts
per million (ppm). That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared on behalf of IR–4 by Dow
AgroSciences, the registrant, which is
available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA has revised
the tolerance expression for all
established commodities to be
consistent with current Agency policy.
The reason for this change is explained
in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue . . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for ethalfluralin
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with ethalfluralin follows.
A. Reliance on Previous Rulemaking
Safety Finding and Risk Assessment
In the Federal Register of December 5,
2007 (72 FR 68529) (FRL–8342–2), EPA
published a final rule (2007 rulemaking)
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
establishing tolerances for residues of
the herbicide ethalfluralin, N-ethyl-N(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine, in or on
dry and fresh dill leaves, mustard seed,
potato, and rapeseed, seed at 0.05 ppm,
based on EPA’s conclusion that
aggregate exposure to ethalfluralin is
safe for the general population,
including infants and children. Since
2007, there have been no additional
tolerance actions for ethalfluralin. The
toxicity profile of ethalfluralin has not
changed since the 2007 rulemaking.
Except as supplemented by the
information described in this unit, EPA
is relying on the risk assessment
underlying the 2007 rulemaking to
establish tolerances of ethalfluralin in or
on rapeseed subgroup 20A and
sunflower subgroup 20B. Further
information about EPA’s risk assessment
and determination of safety supporting
the 2007 rulemaking can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov in the
document entitled: ‘‘Ethalfluralin:
Human Health Risk Assessment for (IR–
4) Proposed Uses on Dill and Potato,’’
document ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2005–0195–0003. The final rule for the
2007 rulemaking can be found in
document ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2005–0195–0002. Currently, there are
tolerances established for residues of
ethalfluralin in or on the representative
commodities of crop subgroups 20A
(rapeseed) and 20B (sunflower seed).
These tolerances were based on
adequate residue field trial data. The
results of these residue data indicate
that no ethalfluralin residues were
detected in or on rapeseed and
sunflower; therefore, tolerances were
established at the limit of quantitation
(LOQ) of 0.05 ppm for these
commodities. Additionally, ethalfluralin
tolerances are established at the LOQ of
0.05 ppm for mustard seed (subgroup
20A) and safflower seed (subgroup 20B).
The ‘‘no detected residues’’ finding is
further supported by review of the
Pesticide Database Program (PDP),
where no residues of ethalfluralin were
found on any crop from 2007 to 2010.
Since the proposed use rates for all
commodities in crop subgroup 20A and
20B are the same as what is currently
permitted for application to rapeseed
and sunflower seed under the existing
registrations, the Agency expects similar
ethalfluralin residues to be present on
other commodities in subgroups 20A
and 20B.
Moreover, rapeseed and sunflower
seed, in addition to safflower seed, are
by far the most consumed commodities
in crop subgroups 20A and 20B; other
commodities in crop subgroup 20A and
20B have low rates of consumption, as
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
supported by the fact that all members
of subgroups 20A and 20B except
sesame, safflower, and mustard are not
included in the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey/‘‘What
We Eat in America’’ (NHANES/WWEIA)
dietary survey. EPA does not expect that
adding sesame exposures to the
ethalfluralin risk assessment to change
the overall risk since consumption of
sesame and exposure to ethalfluralin
residues on sesame are expected to be
so minor compared to all the
representative crops. As a result, EPA
does not expect the establishment of
tolerances for the rapeseed subgroup
20A and the sunflower subgroup 20B to
increase food exposure from what was
assessed in the 2007 risk assessment.
Further, residues from drinking water
are not expected to change from the
2007 risk assessment because the
application rate for subgroup 20A and
20B will be the same as the currently
registered application rate for rapeseed
and sunflower. As a result, the addition
of the new crops in subgroups 20A and
20B would not change the estimated
drinking water concentrations used in
the 2007 risk assessment. In addition,
since the 2007 risk assessment relied on
monitoring data for the cancer
assessment, EPA has reviewed the most
recent water monitoring data to ensure
that the conclusions of 2007 risk
assessment are still valid. Data from the
U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
(USDA) PDP and U.S. Geological
Survey, National Water-Quality
Assessment Program (USGS/NAWQA)
still show that there have been no
detectable or very limited detectable
residues of ethalfluralin in sampled
drinking water and surface/ground
water. PDP sampled 3,515 samples of
drinking water between 2006 and 2011,
and there were no detects at a limit of
detection (LOD) between 30 and 400
parts per trillion (ppt). Likewise, there
has been a very low detection frequency
(0.8%) of ethalfluralin in the USGS/
NAWQA monitoring data in the last
search. Therefore, the assumptions in
the 2007 risk assessment regarding
drinking water are still valid.
Since the dietary risk depends on
both consumption (which the Agency
does not expect to vary significantly
from the 2007 risk assessment) and
residue levels (which the Agency
expects to remain the same as the 2007
risk assessment), the Agency does not
expect the risk from ethalfluralin to
change from the 2007 risk assessment.
B. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
Food Quality Ptotection Act (FQPA)
Safety Factor (SF). In applying this
provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor.
2. In the preamble to the 2007
rulemaking, EPA explained the decision
to reduce the FQPA SF to 1X based on
reliable data. For this action, EPA is
reducing the FQPA SF to 1X for the
following reasons:
a. For the 2007 rulemaking, the
toxicity database was considered
complete. However, changes to 40 CFR
part 158 since the 2007 rulemaking
imposed new data requirements for
immunotoxicity testing and acute and
subchronic neurotoxicity testing for
pesticide registration. In 2012, EPA
determined that the acute and
subchronic neurotoxicity studies are not
required for ethalfluralin based on a
weight-of-evidence approach,
considering all of the available hazard
and exposure information. However, the
immunotoxicity study remains a data
requirement at this time.
Although an immunotoxicity study
has not been received by the Agency,
there is relatively little concern as there
are no indications of immunotoxicity in
the toxicology database; it does not
appear that ethalfluralin directly targets
the immune system. Additionally,
ethalfluralin does not belong to a class
of chemicals (e.g., the organotins, heavy
metals, halogenated aromatic
hydrocarbons) that would be expected
to be immunotoxic. Therefore, the
Agency does not believe that conducting
an immunotoxicity study will result in
a lower point of departure (POD) than
that currently used for overall risk
assessment, and the 10X FQPA SF (in
the form of a database uncertainty factor
(UFDB)) is not needed to account for the
lack of the study.
b. EPA has fully evaluated the toxicity
database of ethalfluralin with respect to
the potential for special sensitivity of
infants and children, and concludes that
there is low concern for pre- and
postnatal susceptibility for infants and
children. The FQPA SF has been
reduced to 1X because:
i. The toxicity database is adequate to
characterize potential pre- and postnatal
risk for infants and children.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40019
ii. No reproductive or developmental
effects were observed in rats.
iii. Although there were slight
developmental effects observed (skeletal
malformations) in rabbits (fetuses), they
were seen in the presence of maternal
toxicity. Additionally, the dose chosen
for acute dietary risk assessment is
protective of the slight developmental
effects observed in the rabbit
developmental toxicity studies.
c. Based on the discussion in Unit
III.A., EPA does not expect dietary
exposure to ethalfluralin or residues in
drinking water to be underestimated.
C. Conclusion
Based upon the findings supporting
the 2007 rulemaking and the
information discussed in Unit III., EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, and to infants and
children, from aggregate exposures to
ethalfluralin residues as a result of
establishing the tolerances for rapeseed
subgroup 20A and sunflower subgroup
20B. Refer to the 2007 rulemaking,
available at https://www.regulations.gov,
for a detailed discussion of the aggregate
risk assessments and determination of
safety.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodologies,
two gas chromatography with electron
capture detection (GC/ECD) methods,
are available to enforce the tolerance
expression. These methods are available
in the Pesticide Analytical Manual
Volume II, section 180.416.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for ethalfluralin.
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
40020
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
The Agency has revised the tolerance
expression to clarify:
1. That, as provided in FFDCA section
408(a)(3), the tolerance covers
metabolites and degradates of
ethalfluralin not specifically mentioned.
2. That compliance with the specified
tolerance levels is to be determined by
measuring only the specific compounds
mentioned in the tolerance expression.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of the herbicide
ethalfluralin, N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4(trifluoromethyl)-benzenamine, in or on
rapeseed subgroup 20A at 0.05 ppm and
sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm.
This regulation additionally removes
established tolerances in or on mustard,
seed; rapeseed, seed; safflower, seed;
and sunflower, seed.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jul 02, 2013
Jkt 229001
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
i. Revise the introductory text of
paragraph (a).
■ ii. Remove the commodities,
‘‘Mustard, seed;’’ ‘‘Rapeseed, seed;’’
‘‘Safflower, seed;’’ and ‘‘Sunflower,
seed’’ from the table in paragraph (a).
■ iii. Add alphabetically the following
commodities to the table in paragraph
(a).
The amendments read as follows:
■
§ 180.416 Ethalfluralin; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of the herbicide
ethalfluralin, including its metabolites
and degradates, in or on the
commodities in the following table.
Compliance with the tolerance levels
specified in the following table is to be
determined by measuring only the
residues of ethalfluralin, N-ethyl-N-(2methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine.
*
*
*
Rapeseed subgroup 20A ......
*
*
0.05
*
*
*
Sunflower subgroup 20B ......
*
*
0.05
*
*
*
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
■
PO 00000
2. In § 180.416:
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–15710 Filed 7–2–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0520; FRL–9390–5]
Fenbuconazole; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of fenbuconazole
in or on pepper. Dow AgroSciences LLC
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
This regulation is effective July
3, 2013. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
September 3, 2013, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03JYR1.SGM
03JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40017-40020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0303; FRL-9391-7]
Ethalfluralin; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
ethalfluralin in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A and sunflower subgroup
20B. This regulation additionally removes the established tolerances in
or on mustard, seed; rapeseed, seed; safflower, seed; and sunflower,
seed, as they will be superseded by the tolerances established by this
final rule. Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested
these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective July 3, 2013. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 3, 2013,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0303, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-
5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Nollen, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 305-7390; email address: nollen.laura@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP
test guidelines referenced in this document electronically, please go
to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.''
[[Page 40018]]
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0303 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
September 3, 2013. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0303, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of July 25, 2012 (77 FR 43562) (FRL-9353-
6), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
2E8007) by IR-4, 500 College Rd. East, Suite 201 W., Princeton, NJ
08540. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.416 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of the herbicide ethalfluralin, N-
ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-
(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine, in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A and
sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 parts per million (ppm). That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared on behalf of IR-4 by Dow
AgroSciences, the registrant, which is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has
revised the tolerance expression for all established commodities to be
consistent with current Agency policy. The reason for this change is
explained in Unit IV.C.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . .
. .''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for ethalfluralin including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with ethalfluralin
follows.
A. Reliance on Previous Rulemaking Safety Finding and Risk Assessment
In the Federal Register of December 5, 2007 (72 FR 68529) (FRL-
8342-2), EPA published a final rule (2007 rulemaking) establishing
tolerances for residues of the herbicide ethalfluralin, N-ethyl-N-(2-
methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine, in or on
dry and fresh dill leaves, mustard seed, potato, and rapeseed, seed at
0.05 ppm, based on EPA's conclusion that aggregate exposure to
ethalfluralin is safe for the general population, including infants and
children. Since 2007, there have been no additional tolerance actions
for ethalfluralin. The toxicity profile of ethalfluralin has not
changed since the 2007 rulemaking.
Except as supplemented by the information described in this unit,
EPA is relying on the risk assessment underlying the 2007 rulemaking to
establish tolerances of ethalfluralin in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A
and sunflower subgroup 20B. Further information about EPA's risk
assessment and determination of safety supporting the 2007 rulemaking
can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in the document entitled:
``Ethalfluralin: Human Health Risk Assessment for (IR-4) Proposed Uses
on Dill and Potato,'' document ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0195-0003. The
final rule for the 2007 rulemaking can be found in document ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0195-0002. Currently, there are tolerances established
for residues of ethalfluralin in or on the representative commodities
of crop subgroups 20A (rapeseed) and 20B (sunflower seed).
These tolerances were based on adequate residue field trial data.
The results of these residue data indicate that no ethalfluralin
residues were detected in or on rapeseed and sunflower; therefore,
tolerances were established at the limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.05
ppm for these commodities. Additionally, ethalfluralin tolerances are
established at the LOQ of 0.05 ppm for mustard seed (subgroup 20A) and
safflower seed (subgroup 20B). The ``no detected residues'' finding is
further supported by review of the Pesticide Database Program (PDP),
where no residues of ethalfluralin were found on any crop from 2007 to
2010. Since the proposed use rates for all commodities in crop subgroup
20A and 20B are the same as what is currently permitted for application
to rapeseed and sunflower seed under the existing registrations, the
Agency expects similar ethalfluralin residues to be present on other
commodities in subgroups 20A and 20B.
Moreover, rapeseed and sunflower seed, in addition to safflower
seed, are by far the most consumed commodities in crop subgroups 20A
and 20B; other commodities in crop subgroup 20A and 20B have low rates
of consumption, as
[[Page 40019]]
supported by the fact that all members of subgroups 20A and 20B except
sesame, safflower, and mustard are not included in the National Health
and Nutrition Examination Survey/``What We Eat in America'' (NHANES/
WWEIA) dietary survey. EPA does not expect that adding sesame exposures
to the ethalfluralin risk assessment to change the overall risk since
consumption of sesame and exposure to ethalfluralin residues on sesame
are expected to be so minor compared to all the representative crops.
As a result, EPA does not expect the establishment of tolerances for
the rapeseed subgroup 20A and the sunflower subgroup 20B to increase
food exposure from what was assessed in the 2007 risk assessment.
Further, residues from drinking water are not expected to change
from the 2007 risk assessment because the application rate for subgroup
20A and 20B will be the same as the currently registered application
rate for rapeseed and sunflower. As a result, the addition of the new
crops in subgroups 20A and 20B would not change the estimated drinking
water concentrations used in the 2007 risk assessment. In addition,
since the 2007 risk assessment relied on monitoring data for the cancer
assessment, EPA has reviewed the most recent water monitoring data to
ensure that the conclusions of 2007 risk assessment are still valid.
Data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) PDP and U.S.
Geological Survey, National Water-Quality Assessment Program (USGS/
NAWQA) still show that there have been no detectable or very limited
detectable residues of ethalfluralin in sampled drinking water and
surface/ground water. PDP sampled 3,515 samples of drinking water
between 2006 and 2011, and there were no detects at a limit of
detection (LOD) between 30 and 400 parts per trillion (ppt). Likewise,
there has been a very low detection frequency (0.8%) of ethalfluralin
in the USGS/NAWQA monitoring data in the last search. Therefore, the
assumptions in the 2007 risk assessment regarding drinking water are
still valid.
Since the dietary risk depends on both consumption (which the
Agency does not expect to vary significantly from the 2007 risk
assessment) and residue levels (which the Agency expects to remain the
same as the 2007 risk assessment), the Agency does not expect the risk
from ethalfluralin to change from the 2007 risk assessment.
B. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
1. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in
the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Ptotection Act
(FQPA) Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either
retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety
factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a
different factor.
2. In the preamble to the 2007 rulemaking, EPA explained the
decision to reduce the FQPA SF to 1X based on reliable data. For this
action, EPA is reducing the FQPA SF to 1X for the following reasons:
a. For the 2007 rulemaking, the toxicity database was considered
complete. However, changes to 40 CFR part 158 since the 2007 rulemaking
imposed new data requirements for immunotoxicity testing and acute and
subchronic neurotoxicity testing for pesticide registration. In 2012,
EPA determined that the acute and subchronic neurotoxicity studies are
not required for ethalfluralin based on a weight-of-evidence approach,
considering all of the available hazard and exposure information.
However, the immunotoxicity study remains a data requirement at this
time.
Although an immunotoxicity study has not been received by the
Agency, there is relatively little concern as there are no indications
of immunotoxicity in the toxicology database; it does not appear that
ethalfluralin directly targets the immune system. Additionally,
ethalfluralin does not belong to a class of chemicals (e.g., the
organotins, heavy metals, halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons) that would
be expected to be immunotoxic. Therefore, the Agency does not believe
that conducting an immunotoxicity study will result in a lower point of
departure (POD) than that currently used for overall risk assessment,
and the 10X FQPA SF (in the form of a database uncertainty factor
(UFDB)) is not needed to account for the lack of the study.
b. EPA has fully evaluated the toxicity database of ethalfluralin
with respect to the potential for special sensitivity of infants and
children, and concludes that there is low concern for pre- and
postnatal susceptibility for infants and children. The FQPA SF has been
reduced to 1X because:
i. The toxicity database is adequate to characterize potential pre-
and postnatal risk for infants and children.
ii. No reproductive or developmental effects were observed in rats.
iii. Although there were slight developmental effects observed
(skeletal malformations) in rabbits (fetuses), they were seen in the
presence of maternal toxicity. Additionally, the dose chosen for acute
dietary risk assessment is protective of the slight developmental
effects observed in the rabbit developmental toxicity studies.
c. Based on the discussion in Unit III.A., EPA does not expect
dietary exposure to ethalfluralin or residues in drinking water to be
underestimated.
C. Conclusion
Based upon the findings supporting the 2007 rulemaking and the
information discussed in Unit III., EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
population, and to infants and children, from aggregate exposures to
ethalfluralin residues as a result of establishing the tolerances for
rapeseed subgroup 20A and sunflower subgroup 20B. Refer to the 2007
rulemaking, available at https://www.regulations.gov, for a detailed
discussion of the aggregate risk assessments and determination of
safety.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodologies, two gas chromatography with
electron capture detection (GC/ECD) methods, are available to enforce
the tolerance expression. These methods are available in the Pesticide
Analytical Manual Volume II, section 180.416.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for ethalfluralin.
[[Page 40020]]
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
The Agency has revised the tolerance expression to clarify:
1. That, as provided in FFDCA section 408(a)(3), the tolerance
covers metabolites and degradates of ethalfluralin not specifically
mentioned.
2. That compliance with the specified tolerance levels is to be
determined by measuring only the specific compounds mentioned in the
tolerance expression.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of the herbicide
ethalfluralin, N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-
(trifluoromethyl)-benzenamine, in or on rapeseed subgroup 20A at 0.05
ppm and sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.05 ppm. This regulation
additionally removes established tolerances in or on mustard, seed;
rapeseed, seed; safflower, seed; and sunflower, seed.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has
been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain
any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. In addition,
this final rule does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.416:
0
i. Revise the introductory text of paragraph (a).
0
ii. Remove the commodities, ``Mustard, seed;'' ``Rapeseed, seed;''
``Safflower, seed;'' and ``Sunflower, seed'' from the table in
paragraph (a).
0
iii. Add alphabetically the following commodities to the table in
paragraph (a).
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 180.416 Ethalfluralin; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the
herbicide ethalfluralin, including its metabolites and degradates, in
or on the commodities in the following table. Compliance with the
tolerance levels specified in the following table is to be determined
by measuring only the residues of ethalfluralin, N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-
propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Rapeseed subgroup 20A................................... 0.05
* * * * *
Sunflower subgroup 20B.................................. 0.05
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-15710 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P