Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 39650-39651 [2013-15893]
Download as PDF
39650
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Proposed Rules
[FR Doc. C1–2013–14367 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0299; FRL–9829–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submittals
from the State of West Virginia pursuant
to the Clean Air Act (CAA). Whenever
new or revised national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) are
promulgated, the CAA requires states to
submit a plan for the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of such
NAAQS. The plan is required to address
basic program elements, including, but
not limited to regulatory structure,
monitoring, modeling, legal authority,
and adequate resources necessary to
assure attainment and maintenance of
the standards. These elements are
referred to as infrastructure
requirements. West Virginia has made
submittals addressing the infrastructure
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. This action approves portions
of those submittals.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID EPA–R03–OAR–
2013–0299 by one of the following
methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0299,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning, Air
Protection Division, Mailcode 3AP30,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2013–
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
0299. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the West Virginia
Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE., Charleston, West
Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787, or by
email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 17, 2012, the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(WVDEP) submitted a revision to its SIP
to satisfy the requirements of section
110(a)(2) of the CAA for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
I. Background
On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated
a revised NAAQS for ozone based on 8hour average concentrations. EPA
revised the level of the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS to 0.075 parts per million
(ppm). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of
the CAA, states are required to submit
SIPs meeting the applicable
requirements of section 110(a)(2) within
three years after promulgation of a new
or revised NAAQS or within such
shorter period as EPA may prescribe.
Section 110(a)(2) requires states to
address basic SIP elements such as
requirements for monitoring, basic
program requirements and legal
authority that are designed to assure
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS. Section 110(a) imposes the
obligation upon states to make a SIP
submission to EPA for a new or revised
NAAQS, but the contents of that
submission may vary depending upon
the facts and circumstances. In
particular, the data and analytical tools
available at the time the state develops
and submits the SIP for a new or revised
NAAQS affects the content of the
submission. The content of such SIP
submissions may also vary depending
upon what provisions the state’s
existing SIP already contains.
In the case of the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, states typically have met the
basic program elements required in
section 110(a)(2) through earlier SIP
submissions in connection with the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. More
specifically, section 110(a)(1) provides
the procedural and timing requirements
for SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific
elements that states must meet for
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP requirements
related to a newly established or revised
NAAQS. As mentioned above, these
requirements include basic SIP elements
such as requirements for monitoring,
basic program requirements and legal
authority that are designed to assure
attainment and maintenance of the
NAAQS.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On February 17, 2012, the WVDEP
provided a submittal to satisfy the
requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the
CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This
submittal addressed the following
infrastructure elements or portions
thereof, which EPA is proposing to
approve: CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M). A detailed summary of EPA’s
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Proposed Rules
review and rationale for approving West
Virginia’s submittal may be found in the
Technical Support Document (TSD) for
this proposed rulemaking action, which
is available online at
www.regulations.gov, Docket number
EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0299.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
following elements or portions thereof
of West Virginia’s February 17, 2012 SIP
revision: (A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii),
(E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L),
and (M). West Virginia’s SIP revision
provides the basic program elements
specified in CAA section 110(a)(2)
necessary to implement, maintain, and
enforce the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This
action does not include any proposed
action on section 110(a)(2)(I) of the CAA
which pertains to the nonattainment
requirements of part D, Title I of the
CAA, because this element is not
required to be submitted by the 3-year
submission deadline of CAA section
110(a)(1), and will be addressed in a
separate process. This action also does
not include proposed action on section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA, because
this element, or portions thereof, is not
required to be submitted by a state to
meet CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) until
the EPA has quantified a state’s
obligations under that section. See EME
Homer City Generation, LP v. EPA, 696
F.3d 7 (DC Cir. 2012), reh’g denied 2013
U.S. App. LEXIS 1623 (Jan. 24, 2013).
Additionally, EPA has taken separate
action on the portions of CAA section
110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the
2008 ozone NAAQS as they relate to
West Virginia’s PSD program, as
required by part C of Title I of the CAA.
This includes portions of the following
infrastructure elements: CAA section
110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J). See (77 FR
63736, October 17, 2012) and (78 FR
27062, May 9, 2013). EPA will take later
separate action on CAA section
110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS as it relates to CAA section 128,
‘‘State Boards.’’
EPA is soliciting public comments on
the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, which
satisfies the infrastructure requirements
of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the
2008 ozone NAAQS, does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds, Nitrogen dioxide, Record
keeping.
PO 00000
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39651
Dated: June 13, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2013–15893 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0211; FRL–9829–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Virginia addressing
the basic program elements specified in
110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
necessary to implement, maintain, and
enforce the 2008 ozone national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS). This
submission is commonly referred to as
an infrastructure SIP. This action does
not include any proposed action on
element (I) which pertains to the
nonattainment requirements of part D,
Title I of the CAA, because this element
is not required to be submitted by the
3-year submission deadline of CAA
section 110(a)(1), and will be addressed
in a separate action. This action is being
taken under the CAA.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2013–0211 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0211,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning, Air
Protection Division, Mailcode 3AP30,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2013–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02JYP1.SGM
02JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39650-39651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15893]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0299; FRL-9829-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittals
from the State of West Virginia pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Whenever new or revised national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
are promulgated, the CAA requires states to submit a plan for the
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such NAAQS. The plan is
required to address basic program elements, including, but not limited
to regulatory structure, monitoring, modeling, legal authority, and
adequate resources necessary to assure attainment and maintenance of
the standards. These elements are referred to as infrastructure
requirements. West Virginia has made submittals addressing the
infrastructure requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This
action approves portions of those submittals.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 1, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID EPA-R03-OAR-
2013-0299 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0299, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Air Protection Division,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2013-0299. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 57th Street SE., Charleston,
West Virginia 25304.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814-5787, or by
email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 17, 2012, the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) submitted a revision to
its SIP to satisfy the requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
I. Background
On March 27, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised NAAQS for ozone based
on 8-hour average concentrations. EPA revised the level of the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS to 0.075 parts per million (ppm). Pursuant to section
110(a)(1) of the CAA, states are required to submit SIPs meeting the
applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) within three years after
promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or within such shorter period as
EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2) requires states to address basic
SIP elements such as requirements for monitoring, basic program
requirements and legal authority that are designed to assure attainment
and maintenance of the NAAQS. Section 110(a) imposes the obligation
upon states to make a SIP submission to EPA for a new or revised NAAQS,
but the contents of that submission may vary depending upon the facts
and circumstances. In particular, the data and analytical tools
available at the time the state develops and submits the SIP for a new
or revised NAAQS affects the content of the submission. The content of
such SIP submissions may also vary depending upon what provisions the
state's existing SIP already contains.
In the case of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, states typically have
met the basic program elements required in section 110(a)(2) through
earlier SIP submissions in connection with the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
More specifically, section 110(a)(1) provides the procedural and timing
requirements for SIPs. Section 110(a)(2) lists specific elements that
states must meet for ``infrastructure'' SIP requirements related to a
newly established or revised NAAQS. As mentioned above, these
requirements include basic SIP elements such as requirements for
monitoring, basic program requirements and legal authority that are
designed to assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On February 17, 2012, the WVDEP provided a submittal to satisfy the
requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
This submittal addressed the following infrastructure elements or
portions thereof, which EPA is proposing to approve: CAA section
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M). A detailed summary of EPA's
[[Page 39651]]
review and rationale for approving West Virginia's submittal may be
found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) for this proposed
rulemaking action, which is available online at www.regulations.gov,
Docket number EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0299.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the following elements or portions
thereof of West Virginia's February 17, 2012 SIP revision: (A), (B),
(C), (D)(i)(II), (D)(ii), (E)(i), (E)(iii), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M). West Virginia's SIP revision provides the basic program
elements specified in CAA section 110(a)(2) necessary to implement,
maintain, and enforce the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This action does not
include any proposed action on section 110(a)(2)(I) of the CAA which
pertains to the nonattainment requirements of part D, Title I of the
CAA, because this element is not required to be submitted by the 3-year
submission deadline of CAA section 110(a)(1), and will be addressed in
a separate process. This action also does not include proposed action
on section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA, because this element, or
portions thereof, is not required to be submitted by a state to meet
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) until the EPA has quantified a state's
obligations under that section. See EME Homer City Generation, LP v.
EPA, 696 F.3d 7 (DC Cir. 2012), reh'g denied 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1623
(Jan. 24, 2013).
Additionally, EPA has taken separate action on the portions of CAA
section 110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS as
they relate to West Virginia's PSD program, as required by part C of
Title I of the CAA. This includes portions of the following
infrastructure elements: CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J).
See (77 FR 63736, October 17, 2012) and (78 FR 27062, May 9, 2013). EPA
will take later separate action on CAA section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the
2008 ozone NAAQS as it relates to CAA section 128, ``State Boards.''
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, which satisfies the infrastructure
requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS,
does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to
apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds, Nitrogen dioxide, Record
keeping.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 13, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2013-15893 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P