Safety Zone; City of Menominee 4th of July Fireworks, Green Bay, Menominee, MI, 39606-39608 [2013-15832]
Download as PDF
39606
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
■
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
2. Add § 165.T05–0439 to read as
follows:
Safety Zone; City of Menominee 4th of
July Fireworks, Green Bay,
Menominee, MI
165.T05–0439 Safety Zone, Assawoman
Bay, Ocean City, MD.
AGENCY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
■
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: specified waters of the
Captain of the Port Sector Hampton
Roads zone, as defined in 33 CFR 3.25–
10, all water of the Assawoman Bay in
Ocean City, MD within a 420 foot radius
of position 38°25′55″ N 075°03′50.92″
W.
(b) Definition. For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or
his designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
Number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 8:45 p.m. to 9:45
p.m. on the following dates: July 14, 21
& 28, 2013 and ending August 4, 11, 18
& 25, 2013.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
John K. Little,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2013–15822 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0540]
RIN 1625–AA00
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the waters of Green Bay near
Menominee, MI. This safety zone is
intended to restrict vessels from a
portion of Green Bay due to a fireworks
display. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect the surrounding
public and vessels from the hazards
associated with the fireworks display.
DATES: This rule is effective and will be
enforced from 9 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on
July 4, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0540. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph
McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at 414–747–7148 or
Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing an
notice NPRM with respect to this rule
because doing so would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The final details for this event
were not known to the Coast Guard
until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date
of this rule to wait for a comment period
to run would be both impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability
to protect spectators and vessels from
the hazards associated with a maritime
fireworks display, which are discussed
further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), The Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this temporary rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
regulated navigation areas and limited
access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6,
160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
The City of Menominee will sponsor
a fireworks display on the waters of
Green Bay from the break wall of
Menominee Memorial Marina during
the evening of July 4, 2013. The Coast
Guard anticipates that a large number of
spectators will congregate around the
launch position during the display. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has
determined that the fireworks display
will pose a significant risk to public
safety and property. Such hazards
include falling debris, flaming debris,
and collisions among spectator vessels.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in
mind, the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, has determined that this
temporary safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the fireworks display
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
within Green Bay. This zone will be
effective and enforced from 9 p.m. until
10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013. This zone
will encompass all waters of Green Bay
near Menominee, MI within a 800-foot
radius of an approximate launch
position at 45°6′25.2″ N, 87°36′4.8″ W
(NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within the safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan, or his designated
on-scene representative. The Captain of
the Port or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
number of small entities. This rule will
affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The
owners or operators of vessels intending
to transit or anchor in a portion of Green
Bay on July 4, 2013.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reasons discussed in the Regulatory
Planning and Review section.
Additionally, before enforcement of the
zone, we will issue a local Broadcast
Notice to Mariners so vessel owners and
operators can plan accordingly.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it will have minimal
impact on the economy, will not
interfere with other agencies, will not
adversely alter the budget of any grant
or loan recipients, and will not raise any
novel legal or policy issues. The safety
zone created by this rule will be small
and enforced for only one day in July.
Under certain conditions, moreover,
vessels may still transit through the
safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
the impact of this proposed rule on
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39607
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
39608
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR parts 165 as follows:
enforced from 9 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on
July 4, 2013.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan
is any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan to act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Vessel operators given permission to
enter or operate in the safety zone must
comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port, Lake
Michigan, or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013–15832 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Coast Guard
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0541]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Summer in the City Water
Ski Show; Fox River, Green Bay, WI
2. Add § 165.T09–0540 to read as
follows:
AGENCY:
§ 165.T09–0540 Safety Zone; City of
Menominee 4th of July Fireworks, Green
Bay, Menominee, MI.
SUMMARY:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
■
ACTION:
(a) Location. All waters of Green Bay
near Menominee, MI within a 800-foot
radius of an approximate launch
position from the break wall at
Menominee Memorial Marina at
45°6′25.2″ N, 87°36′4.8″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period.
This rule is effective and will be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Fox River in Green Bay, WI. This
safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Fox River
due to a water ski show. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the
hazards associated with the water ski
show.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This rule is effective from 6 p.m.
on July 10, 2013, until 7:30 p.m. on
August 28, 2013. This rule will be
enforced from 6 p.m. until 6:30 p.m. and
again from 7 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. on
each day of July 10, 17, 24, 31, and
August 7, 14, 21, and 28, of 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket USCG–
2013–0541. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph
McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at 414–747–7148 or
Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing an
NPRM with respect to this rule because
doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final
details for this event were not known to
the Coast Guard until there was
insufficient time remaining before the
event to publish an NPRM. Thus,
delaying the effective date of this rule to
wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to
the public interest because it would
inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability to
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39606-39608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15832]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2013-0540]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; City of Menominee 4th of July Fireworks, Green Bay,
Menominee, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
waters of Green Bay near Menominee, MI. This safety zone is intended to
restrict vessels from a portion of Green Bay due to a fireworks
display. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the
surrounding public and vessels from the hazards associated with the
fireworks display.
DATES: This rule is effective and will be enforced from 9 p.m. until
10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0540. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, contact or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Lake Michigan, at 414-747-7148 or Joseph.P.McCollum@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
TFR Temporary Final Rule
A. Regulatory History and Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an notice NPRM with respect to this
rule because doing so would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The final details for this event were not known to the Coast
Guard until there was insufficient time remaining before the event to
publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait
for a comment period to run would be both impracticable and contrary to
the public interest because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability
to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with a
maritime fireworks display, which are discussed further below.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), The Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this temporary rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
The City of Menominee will sponsor a fireworks display on the
waters of Green Bay from the break wall of Menominee Memorial Marina
during the evening of July 4, 2013. The Coast Guard anticipates that a
large number of spectators will congregate around the launch position
during the display. The Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, has
determined that the fireworks display will pose a significant risk to
public safety and property. Such hazards include falling debris,
flaming debris, and collisions among spectator vessels.
C. Discussion of the Final Rule
With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan, has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels during the
fireworks display
[[Page 39607]]
within Green Bay. This zone will be effective and enforced from 9 p.m.
until 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013. This zone will encompass all waters
of Green Bay near Menominee, MI within a 800-foot radius of an
approximate launch position at 45[deg]6'25.2'' N, 87[deg]36'4.8'' W
(NAD 83).
Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be
small and enforced for only one day in July. Under certain conditions,
moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone when
permitted by the Captain of the Port.
2. Impact on Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of Green Bay on
July 4, 2013.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before
enforcement of the zone, we will issue a local Broadcast Notice to
Mariners so vessel owners and operators can plan accordingly.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
[[Page 39608]]
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone and,
therefore it is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR parts 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0540 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0540 Safety Zone; City of Menominee 4th of July
Fireworks, Green Bay, Menominee, MI.
(a) Location. All waters of Green Bay near Menominee, MI within a
800-foot radius of an approximate launch position from the break wall
at Menominee Memorial Marina at 45[deg]6'25.2'' N, 87[deg]36'4.8'' W
(NAD 83).
(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. This rule is effective and
will be enforced from 9 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his
designated on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan to
act on his behalf.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan or his on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan or his on-scene representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port, Lake Michigan, or his on-scene representative.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2013-15832 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P