Mango Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Nominations of Foreign Producers and Election of Officers, 39564-39567 [2013-15747]
Download as PDF
39564
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
IMPORT ASSESSMENT TABLE—
Continued
IMPORT ASSESSMENT TABLE—
Continued
[Raw cotton fiber]
[Raw cotton fiber]
Conv.
factor
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
HTS No.
6302321040
6302321050
6302321060
6302322010
6302322020
6302322030
6302322040
6302322050
6302322060
6302390030
6302402010
6302511000
6302512000
6302513000
6302514000
6302593020
6302600010
6302600020
6302600030
6302910005
6302910015
6302910025
6302910035
6302910045
6302910050
6302910060
6302931000
6302932000
6302992000
6303191100
6303910010
6303910020
6303921000
6303922010
6303922030
6303922050
6303990010
6304111000
6304113000
6304190500
6304191000
6304191500
6304192000
6304193060
6304910020
6304910070
6304920000
6304996040
6505001515
6505001525
6505001540
6505002030
6505002060
6505002545
6507000000
9404901000
9404908020
9404908040
9404908505
9404908536
9404909505
9404909570
9619002100
9619002500
9619003100
9619003300
9619004100
9619004300
9619006100
VerDate Mar<15>2010
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
0.3876
0.3876
0.3876
0.5537
0.3876
0.5537
0.3876
0.3876
0.3876
0.2215
0.9412
0.5537
0.8305
0.5537
0.7751
0.5537
1.1073
0.9966
0.9966
0.9966
1.1073
0.9966
0.9966
0.9966
0.9966
0.9966
0.4429
0.4429
0.2215
0.8859
0.609
0.609
0.2768
0.2768
0.2768
0.2768
0.2768
0.9966
0.1107
0.9966
1.1073
0.3876
0.3876
0.2215
0.8859
0.2215
0.8859
0.2215
1.1189
0.5594
1.1189
0.9412
0.9412
0.5537
0.3986
0.2104
0.9966
0.9966
0.6644
0.0997
0.6644
0.2658
0.8681
0.1085
0.9535
1.1545
0.2384
0.2384
0.8528
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Cents/kg.
0.4991
0.4991
0.4991
0.7129
0.4991
0.7129
0.4991
0.4991
0.4991
0.2852
1.2119
0.7129
1.0694
0.7129
0.9980
0.7129
1.4258
1.2832
1.2832
1.2832
1.4258
1.2832
1.2832
1.2832
1.2832
1.2832
0.5703
0.5703
0.2852
1.1407
0.7841
0.7841
0.3564
0.3564
0.3564
0.3564
0.3564
1.2832
0.1425
1.2832
1.4258
0.4991
0.4991
0.2852
1.1407
0.2852
1.1407
0.2852
1.4407
0.7203
1.4407
1.2119
1.2119
0.7129
0.5132
0.2709
1.2832
1.2832
0.8555
0.1284
0.8555
0.3422
1.1178
0.1397
1.2277
1.4865
0.3070
0.3070
1.0981
Jkt 229001
Conv.
factor
HTS No.
9619006400
9619006800
9619007100
9619007400
9619007800
9619007900
..
..
..
..
..
..
*
*
*
Cents/kg.
0.2437
0.3655
1.1099
0.2466
0.2466
0.2466
*
0.3138
0.4706
1.4291
0.3175
0.3175
0.3175
*
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2101–2118
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–15748 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
authorized under the Commodity
Promotion, Research, and Information
Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411–7425).
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated as ‘‘non-significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has waived the review process.
This document amends the
Mango Promotion, Research, and
Information Order (Order) to allow
foreign producers, from countries
exporting mangos to the United States,
to nominate themselves or other foreign
producers for appointment to the
National Mango Board (Board). This
change would increase the pool of
foreign producer nominees. Upon
further review, the proposed change to
add flexibility to the timing of election
of officers to the Board is not made in
this rulemaking.
DATES: Effective July 3, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Room 1406–S, Stop 0244,
Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone:
(202) 720–9915; toll free (888) 720–
9917; fax: (202) 205–2800; email:
Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. It is not intended to have a
retroactive effect.
Section 524 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 7423)
provides that the Act shall not affect or
preempt any other State or Federal law
authorizing promotion or research
relating to an agricultural commodity.
Under the Act, a person subject to an
order may file a petition with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (Department)
stating that an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not
established in accordance with the law,
and request a modification of an order
or an exemption from an order. Any
petition filed challenging an order, any
provision of an order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with an order,
shall be filed within two years after the
effective date of an order, provision, or
obligation subject to challenge in the
petition. The petitioner will have the
opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. Thereafter, the Department will
issue a ruling on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States for any district in which
the petitioner resides or conducts
business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if
the petitioner files a complaint for that
purpose not later than 20 days after the
date of the entry of the Department’s
final ruling.
This rule
is issued under the Mango Promotion,
Research, and Information Order (Order)
(7 CFR part 1206). The Order is
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601–
7 CFR Part 1206
[Document No. AMS–FV–12–0041]
Mango Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Nominations of
Foreign Producers and Election of
Officers
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
612), the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
impact of this action on the small
entities that would be affected by this
rule. The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory action to scale on businesses
subject to such action so that small
businesses will not be
disproportionately burdened.
The Small Business Administration
defines small agricultural producers as
those having annual receipts of no more
than $750,000 and small agricultural
service firms as those having annual
receipts of no more than $7 million (13
CFR part 121). First handlers and
importers would be considered
agricultural service firms, and the
majority of mango producers, first
handlers and importers would be
considered small businesses. Foreign
producer associations consisting of
foreign producers would reflect the size
of the producer entities. Although this
criterion does not factor in additional
monies that may be received by
producers, handlers and importers of
mangos, it is an inclusive standard for
identifying small entities.
Mango producers are not subject to
the assessment. First handlers and
importers who market or import less
than 500,000 pounds of mangos
annually are exempt from the
assessment. Mangos that are exported
out of the United States are also exempt
from assessment. Furthermore, while
domestic and foreign producers are not
subject to assessment under the Order,
such individuals are eligible to serve on
the Board along with importers and first
handlers. Currently, approximately
three first handlers and 193 importers
are subject to assessment under the
Order.
U.S. production of mangos is located
in California, Florida, Hawaii, Texas,
and Puerto Rico according to the most
recent U.S. Census of Agriculture
(Agricultural Census) which was
conducted in 2007. The Agricultural
Census does not include California
production because California has so
few producers that publishing
production data would reveal
confidential information. According to
the 2007 Agricultural Census published
by the Department’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the U.S.
had a total of 2,259 acres of mangos in
2007, which is the most recent data
available. Out of the total acreage, 1,212
acres (54 percent) were in Florida, and
the remaining 1,047 acres (46 percent)
were in Hawaii, California, and Texas.
The Agricultural Census does not
collect mango production data for
Puerto Rico. Individual acreage for
Hawaii, California and Texas are not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
available. U.S. mango acreage rose by
321 acres between 2002 and 2007.
Florida saw a decrease of 161 acres
between 2002 and 2007 census, but
acres in other States rose by 482 acres.
Census data is published every five
years. The next available census of
agriculture data will be available in
2014.
Seven countries account for 99
percent of the mangos imported into the
United Sates. These countries and their
share of the imports (from April 1, 2011,
through March 31, 2012) are: Mexico (68
percent); Ecuador (9 percent); Brazil (7
percent); Peru (7 percent); Guatemala (4
percent); Haiti (3 percent); and
Nicaragua (1 percent). For the period
from April 1, 2011, through March 31,
2012, the United States imported a total
of 396,423 tons of mangos, valued at
$280 million.
The Board is composed of 18
members, including eight importers;
two domestic producers; one first
handler; and seven foreign producers.
Nominations and appointments to the
Board are conducted pursuant to section
1206.31 of the Order. Nominations for
the importer, domestic producer, and
first handler seats are made by U.S.
importers, domestic producers, and first
handlers, respectively. Foreign
producers are nominated by foreign
producer associations. The Board wants
to increase the pool of nominees from
the countries that export mangos to the
United States by allowing foreign
producers in major producing countries
to nominate foreign producers to the
Board.
Section 515(b)(2)(C) of the Act states
the Secretary may make appointments
from nominations made pursuant to the
method set forth in the order. The Board
wants to receive representation from all
mango growing regions within the major
mango exporting countries to the United
States. Section 1206.31(g) of the Order
limits the nominations for the foreign
producer seats to the foreign mango
organizations. At a meeting on
September 11, 2009, the Board voted (9
out of 14 in favor) to allow foreign
producers from the major countries
exporting mangos to the United States to
nominate themselves or other foreign
producers for appointment to the Board.
At a Board meeting, the Board decided
to request this change. The change does
not limit the foreign producer
organizations’ ability to submit
nominations. The change increases the
slate of candidates from which the
Secretary may choose to appoint to the
Board. It also provides an opportunity to
increase diversity on the Board.
In addition, on July 11, 2012, the
Board voted unanimously to amend the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39565
Order to provide the Board flexibility in
the election of officers. Currently,
section 1206.34(b) of the Order requires
the Board to select a chairperson and a
vice chairperson at the start of its fiscal
period. Pursuant to section 1206.7, the
fiscal period begins January 1. The term
of office also begins January 1, pursuant
to section 1206.32.
The Board must schedule Board
meetings around several domestic and
international growing regions in the
mango industry. The Board had
considered changing its fiscal year, but
that change was rejected by the Board
members because the Board’s fiscal year
flows with the mango production cycle,
which is a calendar year.
Section 515(c)(3) of the Act allows the
Board to meet, organize, and select from
among its members its officers as the
Board determines appropriate.
Therefore, the Board proposed updating
the Order to reflect the particular needs
of the mango industry and to provide for
a more efficient management method.
However, as discussed further in the
background section, no change is made
to section 1206.32 of the Order.
This rule does not impose additional
recordkeeping requirements on first
handlers, importers, or producers of
mangos. There are no Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
In accordance with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
regulation (5 CFR part 1320) that
implements the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements that are
imposed by the Order have been
previously approved under OMB
control number 0581–0093. This rule
does not result in a change to the
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements previously
approved.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Background
The Order became effective on
November 3, 2004, and it is authorized
under the Act. The Board is composed
of 18 members, including eight
importers; two domestic producers; one
first handler; and seven foreign
producers. Nominations for the
importer, domestic producer, and first
handler seats are made by U.S.
importers, domestic producers, and first
handlers, respectively. Currently,
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
39566
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
foreign producers are nominated by
foreign producer associations.
Under the Order, the Board
administers a nationally coordinated
program of research and promotion
designed to strengthen the position of
mangos in the marketplace and to
establish, maintain, and expand U.S.
markets for mangos. The program is
financed by an assessment of three
quarters of a cent ($0.0075) per pound
on first handlers and importers of
500,000 pounds or more of mangos
annually. The Order specifies that first
handlers are responsible for submitting
assessments to the Board on a monthly
basis and maintaining records necessary
to verify their reporting. Importers are
responsible for paying assessments on
mangos imported for marketing in the
United States through the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection Service of the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The Board wants to increase the pool
of nominees from the countries that
export mangos to the United States by
allowing foreign producers in major
producing countries to nominate foreign
producers to serve on the Board. The
Board wants to receive representation
from all mango growing regions within
the countries that export mangos to the
United States. Section 1206.31(g) of the
Order limits the nominations for the
foreign producer seats to the foreign
mango organizations. At a meeting on
September 11, 2009, the Board voted to
allow foreign producers from the major
countries exporting mangos to the
United States to nominate themselves or
other foreign producers for appointment
to the Board. At a meeting, the Board
decided to request this change. The
change does not limit the foreign
producer organizations’ ability to
submit nominations. It increases the
slate of candidates from which the
Secretary may choose to appoint
members to the Board.
This change is consistent with section
515(b)(2)(C) of the Act, which states the
Secretary may make appointments from
nominations made pursuant to the
method set forth in the Order. The
Board wants to expand its slate of
candidates for the Secretary’s decision
for appointment to the Board.
Accordingly, section 1206.31(g) of the
Order would be revised to allow foreign
producers to nominate themselves or
other foreign producers to serve on the
Board.
In addition, on July 11, 2012, the
Board voted unanimously to amend the
Order to provide the Board flexibility in
the election of officers. Currently,
section 1206.34 (b) of the Order requires
the Board to select a chairperson and a
vice chairperson at the start of its fiscal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
period. Pursuant to section 1206.7, the
fiscal period begins January 1. The term
of office also begins January 1, pursuant
to section 1206.32.
The Board must schedule Board
meetings around several domestic and
international growing regions in the
mango industry. The Board had
considered changing its fiscal year, but
that change was rejected because the
Board’s fiscal year flows with the mango
production cycle, which is a calendar
year. The Board proposed updating the
Order to reflect the particular needs of
the mango industry and to provide for
a more efficient management method.
The proposal noted that the Board
believed that electing its officers at the
last meeting of the fiscal year would be
more advantageous for the Board. We
have further considered this matter and
believe that the Board could make
suggestions concerning officers prior to
the start of the fiscal period, and the
new Board appointed for the term of
office beginning January 1, could
consider the prior Board’s suggestions
before the Board makes its
recommendation to the Secretary for
approval. This will ensure that newly
appointed members who may not have
served on the prior Board would have
the opportunity to participate in the
election of officers. This action could be
done on January 1, or soon thereafter
through an electronic mail vote, by
telephone, or other means of
communications pursuant to section
1206.34(f) of the Order. The Board could
specify these procedures in its bylaws.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on February 6, 2013 (78 FR
8441). Copies of the rule were made
available through the Internet at
www.regulations.gov, by the
Department, and the Office of the
Federal Register. That rule provided a
20-day comment period which ended on
February 26, 2013. Two comments were
received by the deadline.
rulemaking and as such, should be
presented to the Board for their
consideration. Accordingly, no change
has been made to this section.
This commenter also was of the view
with regard to the proposed change to
section 1206.34, that the Board needs to
determine the best time each year to
hold election of officers. As discussed
previously, the Board has the ability to
determine an appropriate time each year
to hold election of officers within a
given year; however, in order to provide
newly appointed members the
opportunity to participate in electing
officers, the election should take place
on or after January 1 as stated in the
Order.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, the Board’s
recommendation, public comments and
other information, it is hereby found
that this rule, published in the Federal
Register on February 6, 2013 (78 FR
8441), is consistent with and will
effectuate the purposes of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found that good cause exists for not
postponing the effective date of this
action until 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register because this action
needs to be in effect before the Board
makes a call for nominations for the
term of office beginning January 1, 2014.
Further, this action helps to increase the
pool of nominees to be considered for
appointment to the Board. Finally, the
proposed rule provided for a 20-day
comment period, and the two comments
received support the changes.
Summary of Comments
The two comments received
supported the proposed change to
section 1206.31(g). One commenter
made a recommendation regarding the
last sentence in section 1206.31(g) of the
Order that requires foreign producer
nominees to be representative of the
major countries exporting mangos to the
United States. The commenter suggested
that the term ‘‘major exporting country’’
be defined. As previously stated,
Mexico, Ecuador, Brazil, Peru,
Guatemala, Haiti, and Nicaragua
account for 99 percent of the mango
imports into the United States. This
suggestion was not part of this
PART 1206—MANGO PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION
ORDER
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1206
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Mango promotion, Reporting and
recording requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1206 is amended
as follows:
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1206 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and 7401.
2. In § 1206.31, paragraph (g) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 1206.31
Nominations and appointments.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Nominees to fill the foreign
producer member positions on the
Board shall be solicited from
organizations of foreign mango
producers and from foreign mango
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 127 / Tuesday, July 2, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
producers. Organizations of foreign
mango producers shall submit two
nominees for each position, and foreign
mango producers may submit their
name or the names of other foreign
mango producers directly to the Board.
The nominees shall be representative of
the major countries exporting mangos to
the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Rex Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–15747 Filed 7–1–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1230; Directorate
Identifier 2011–NM–107–AD; Amendment
39–17477; AD 2013–11–17]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A.
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
airworthiness directive (AD) 2010–14–
14 that applies to certain Embraer S.A.
Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 airplanes.
AD 2010–14–14 currently requires, for
certain airplanes, repetitively replacing
the low-stage check valve and
associated seals of the right hand (RH)
engine’s engine bleed system with a
new check valve and new seals,
replacing the low pressure check valves
(LPCVs), and revising the maintenance
program. For certain other airplanes, AD
2010–14–14 requires replacing a certain
low-stage check valve with an improved
low-stage check valve. For certain
airplanes, this new AD adds replacing
certain LPCVs of the left hand (LH) and
RH engines, which would be an option
for other airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of uncommanded
engine shutdowns on both Model ERJ
170 and ERJ 190 airplanes due to
excessive wear and failure of LPCVs
having certain part numbers. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the
possibility of a dual engine in-flight
shutdown due to LPCV failure.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
August 6, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:51 Jul 01, 2013
Jkt 229001
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of August 6, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain other publications listed in
this AD as of August 26, 2010 (75 FR
42585, July 22, 2010).
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of September 13, 2007 (72 FR 44734,
August 9, 2007).
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain other publication listed in
this AD as of November 29, 2005 (70 FR
69075, November 14, 2005).
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Ashforth, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2768;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 26, 2012 (77 FR
75911), and proposed to supersede AD
2010–14–14, Amendment 39–16359 (75
FR 42585, July 22, 2010). (AD 2010–14–
14 superseded AD 2007–16–09,
Amendment 39–15148 (72 FR 44734,
August 9, 2007)). AD 2007–16–09
superseded AD 2005–23–14,
Amendment 39–14372 (70 FR 69075,
November 14, 2005). The NPRM
proposed to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information (MCAI) for Embraer S.A.
Model ERJ 170 airplanes states:
It has been found the occurrence of an
engine in-flight shutdown * * * caused by
the LPCV failure P/N [part number] 1001447–
3 with 3,900 Flight Hours (FH) installed on
ERJ–170. This valve failed [to] open due [to]
excessive wear. [I]t was found the occurrence
of an engine shutdown on-ground, caused by
the LPCV failure P/N 1001447–4 with 1,802
FH installed on ERJ–190 failed due [to] low
cycle fatigue. Since the behavior of a valve
P/N 1001447–4 removed from ERJ–190 is
unknown on ERJ–170 and the P/N 1001447–
4 is common between ERJ–170 and ERJ–190
airplane fleet, an action is necessary to
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
39567
prevent the installation, in ERJ–170
airplanes, of LPCVs P/N 1001447–4
previously installed in ERJ–190 airplanes.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
The MCAI for Embraer S.A. Model
ERJ 190 airplanes states:
It has been found the occurrence of an
engine in-flight shutdown * * * caused by
the LPCV failure P/N 1001447–3 with 3,900
Flight Hours (FH) installed on ERJ–170. This
valve failed [to] open due [to] excessive wear.
[I]t was found the occurrence of an engine
shutdown on-ground, caused by the LPCV
failure P/N 1001447–4 with 1,802 FH
installed on ERJ–190 failed due [to] low cycle
fatigue. Since the behavior of a valve P/N
1001447–4 removed from ERJ–170 is
unknown on ERJ–190 and the P/N 1001447–
4 is common between ERJ–170 and ERJ–190
airplane fleet, an action is necessary to
prevent the installation, in ERJ–190
airplanes, of LPCVs P/N 1001447–4
previously installed in ERJ–170 airplanes.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is the possibility
of a dual engine in-flight shutdown due
to LPCV failure. The required actions
include the actions required by AD
2010–14–14, Amendment 39–16359 (75
FR 42585, July 22, 2010), and, for
certain airplanes, replacing the LPCVs
of the LH and RH engines, which would
be an option for certain other airplanes.
You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
have considered the comment received.
Request for Clarification of Approved
Method
US Airways requested clarification of
paragraph (l) of the NPRM (77 FR 75911,
December 26, 2012), which requires
installing a new LPCV using a method
approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
ˆ
Agencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil
¸˜
(ANAC) (or its delegated agent). The
commenter requested clarification of the
approved method so operators can
understand acceptable and unacceptable
methods of installation. The commenter
also stated that the approved method
needs to be stated to avoid having to
obtain approval of an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) allowing
use of certain documents.
We agree to provide clarification. We
have reviewed EMBRAER Service
Bulletins 190–36–0014, Revision 01,
dated January 14, 2009; 190–LIN–36–
0004, dated December 23, 2009; and
170–36–0011, Revision 2, dated July 19,
2007. Those bulletins provide
instructions for installing P/N 1001447–
E:\FR\FM\02JYR1.SGM
02JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39564-39567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15747]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1206
[Document No. AMS-FV-12-0041]
Mango Promotion, Research, and Information Order; Nominations of
Foreign Producers and Election of Officers
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Mango Promotion, Research, and
Information Order (Order) to allow foreign producers, from countries
exporting mangos to the United States, to nominate themselves or other
foreign producers for appointment to the National Mango Board (Board).
This change would increase the pool of foreign producer nominees. Upon
further review, the proposed change to add flexibility to the timing of
election of officers to the Board is not made in this rulemaking.
DATES: Effective July 3, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 1406-S, Stop 0244, Washington,
DC 20250-0244; telephone: (202) 720-9915; toll free (888) 720-9917;
fax: (202) 205-2800; email: Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under the Mango
Promotion, Research, and Information Order (Order) (7 CFR part 1206).
The Order is authorized under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and
Information Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425).
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated as ``non-significant
regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has waived the
review process.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have a retroactive effect.
Section 524 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 7423) provides that the Act shall
not affect or preempt any other State or Federal law authorizing
promotion or research relating to an agricultural commodity.
Under the Act, a person subject to an order may file a petition
with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Department) stating that an
order, any provision of an order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with an order, is not established in accordance with the
law, and request a modification of an order or an exemption from an
order. Any petition filed challenging an order, any provision of an
order, or any obligation imposed in connection with an order, shall be
filed within two years after the effective date of an order, provision,
or obligation subject to challenge in the petition. The petitioner will
have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter, the
Department will issue a ruling on the petition. The Act provides that
the district court of the United States for any district in which the
petitioner resides or conducts business shall have the jurisdiction to
review a final ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a
complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the
entry of the Department's final ruling.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
601-
[[Page 39565]]
612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on the small entities that would be
affected by this rule. The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory
action to scale on businesses subject to such action so that small
businesses will not be disproportionately burdened.
The Small Business Administration defines small agricultural
producers as those having annual receipts of no more than $750,000 and
small agricultural service firms as those having annual receipts of no
more than $7 million (13 CFR part 121). First handlers and importers
would be considered agricultural service firms, and the majority of
mango producers, first handlers and importers would be considered small
businesses. Foreign producer associations consisting of foreign
producers would reflect the size of the producer entities. Although
this criterion does not factor in additional monies that may be
received by producers, handlers and importers of mangos, it is an
inclusive standard for identifying small entities.
Mango producers are not subject to the assessment. First handlers
and importers who market or import less than 500,000 pounds of mangos
annually are exempt from the assessment. Mangos that are exported out
of the United States are also exempt from assessment. Furthermore,
while domestic and foreign producers are not subject to assessment
under the Order, such individuals are eligible to serve on the Board
along with importers and first handlers. Currently, approximately three
first handlers and 193 importers are subject to assessment under the
Order.
U.S. production of mangos is located in California, Florida,
Hawaii, Texas, and Puerto Rico according to the most recent U.S. Census
of Agriculture (Agricultural Census) which was conducted in 2007. The
Agricultural Census does not include California production because
California has so few producers that publishing production data would
reveal confidential information. According to the 2007 Agricultural
Census published by the Department's National Agricultural Statistics
Service, the U.S. had a total of 2,259 acres of mangos in 2007, which
is the most recent data available. Out of the total acreage, 1,212
acres (54 percent) were in Florida, and the remaining 1,047 acres (46
percent) were in Hawaii, California, and Texas. The Agricultural Census
does not collect mango production data for Puerto Rico. Individual
acreage for Hawaii, California and Texas are not available. U.S. mango
acreage rose by 321 acres between 2002 and 2007. Florida saw a decrease
of 161 acres between 2002 and 2007 census, but acres in other States
rose by 482 acres. Census data is published every five years. The next
available census of agriculture data will be available in 2014.
Seven countries account for 99 percent of the mangos imported into
the United Sates. These countries and their share of the imports (from
April 1, 2011, through March 31, 2012) are: Mexico (68 percent);
Ecuador (9 percent); Brazil (7 percent); Peru (7 percent); Guatemala (4
percent); Haiti (3 percent); and Nicaragua (1 percent). For the period
from April 1, 2011, through March 31, 2012, the United States imported
a total of 396,423 tons of mangos, valued at $280 million.
The Board is composed of 18 members, including eight importers; two
domestic producers; one first handler; and seven foreign producers.
Nominations and appointments to the Board are conducted pursuant to
section 1206.31 of the Order. Nominations for the importer, domestic
producer, and first handler seats are made by U.S. importers, domestic
producers, and first handlers, respectively. Foreign producers are
nominated by foreign producer associations. The Board wants to increase
the pool of nominees from the countries that export mangos to the
United States by allowing foreign producers in major producing
countries to nominate foreign producers to the Board.
Section 515(b)(2)(C) of the Act states the Secretary may make
appointments from nominations made pursuant to the method set forth in
the order. The Board wants to receive representation from all mango
growing regions within the major mango exporting countries to the
United States. Section 1206.31(g) of the Order limits the nominations
for the foreign producer seats to the foreign mango organizations. At a
meeting on September 11, 2009, the Board voted (9 out of 14 in favor)
to allow foreign producers from the major countries exporting mangos to
the United States to nominate themselves or other foreign producers for
appointment to the Board. At a Board meeting, the Board decided to
request this change. The change does not limit the foreign producer
organizations' ability to submit nominations. The change increases the
slate of candidates from which the Secretary may choose to appoint to
the Board. It also provides an opportunity to increase diversity on the
Board.
In addition, on July 11, 2012, the Board voted unanimously to amend
the Order to provide the Board flexibility in the election of officers.
Currently, section 1206.34(b) of the Order requires the Board to select
a chairperson and a vice chairperson at the start of its fiscal period.
Pursuant to section 1206.7, the fiscal period begins January 1. The
term of office also begins January 1, pursuant to section 1206.32.
The Board must schedule Board meetings around several domestic and
international growing regions in the mango industry. The Board had
considered changing its fiscal year, but that change was rejected by
the Board members because the Board's fiscal year flows with the mango
production cycle, which is a calendar year.
Section 515(c)(3) of the Act allows the Board to meet, organize,
and select from among its members its officers as the Board determines
appropriate. Therefore, the Board proposed updating the Order to
reflect the particular needs of the mango industry and to provide for a
more efficient management method. However, as discussed further in the
background section, no change is made to section 1206.32 of the Order.
This rule does not impose additional recordkeeping requirements on
first handlers, importers, or producers of mangos. There are no Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
In accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulation (5 CFR part 1320) that implements the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the information collection and
recordkeeping requirements that are imposed by the Order have been
previously approved under OMB control number 0581-0093. This rule does
not result in a change to the information collection and recordkeeping
requirements previously approved.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Background
The Order became effective on November 3, 2004, and it is
authorized under the Act. The Board is composed of 18 members,
including eight importers; two domestic producers; one first handler;
and seven foreign producers. Nominations for the importer, domestic
producer, and first handler seats are made by U.S. importers, domestic
producers, and first handlers, respectively. Currently,
[[Page 39566]]
foreign producers are nominated by foreign producer associations.
Under the Order, the Board administers a nationally coordinated
program of research and promotion designed to strengthen the position
of mangos in the marketplace and to establish, maintain, and expand
U.S. markets for mangos. The program is financed by an assessment of
three quarters of a cent ($0.0075) per pound on first handlers and
importers of 500,000 pounds or more of mangos annually. The Order
specifies that first handlers are responsible for submitting
assessments to the Board on a monthly basis and maintaining records
necessary to verify their reporting. Importers are responsible for
paying assessments on mangos imported for marketing in the United
States through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Service of the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
The Board wants to increase the pool of nominees from the countries
that export mangos to the United States by allowing foreign producers
in major producing countries to nominate foreign producers to serve on
the Board. The Board wants to receive representation from all mango
growing regions within the countries that export mangos to the United
States. Section 1206.31(g) of the Order limits the nominations for the
foreign producer seats to the foreign mango organizations. At a meeting
on September 11, 2009, the Board voted to allow foreign producers from
the major countries exporting mangos to the United States to nominate
themselves or other foreign producers for appointment to the Board. At
a meeting, the Board decided to request this change. The change does
not limit the foreign producer organizations' ability to submit
nominations. It increases the slate of candidates from which the
Secretary may choose to appoint members to the Board.
This change is consistent with section 515(b)(2)(C) of the Act,
which states the Secretary may make appointments from nominations made
pursuant to the method set forth in the Order. The Board wants to
expand its slate of candidates for the Secretary's decision for
appointment to the Board. Accordingly, section 1206.31(g) of the Order
would be revised to allow foreign producers to nominate themselves or
other foreign producers to serve on the Board.
In addition, on July 11, 2012, the Board voted unanimously to amend
the Order to provide the Board flexibility in the election of officers.
Currently, section 1206.34 (b) of the Order requires the Board to
select a chairperson and a vice chairperson at the start of its fiscal
period. Pursuant to section 1206.7, the fiscal period begins January 1.
The term of office also begins January 1, pursuant to section 1206.32.
The Board must schedule Board meetings around several domestic and
international growing regions in the mango industry. The Board had
considered changing its fiscal year, but that change was rejected
because the Board's fiscal year flows with the mango production cycle,
which is a calendar year. The Board proposed updating the Order to
reflect the particular needs of the mango industry and to provide for a
more efficient management method. The proposal noted that the Board
believed that electing its officers at the last meeting of the fiscal
year would be more advantageous for the Board. We have further
considered this matter and believe that the Board could make
suggestions concerning officers prior to the start of the fiscal
period, and the new Board appointed for the term of office beginning
January 1, could consider the prior Board's suggestions before the
Board makes its recommendation to the Secretary for approval. This will
ensure that newly appointed members who may not have served on the
prior Board would have the opportunity to participate in the election
of officers. This action could be done on January 1, or soon thereafter
through an electronic mail vote, by telephone, or other means of
communications pursuant to section 1206.34(f) of the Order. The Board
could specify these procedures in its bylaws.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on February 6, 2013 (78 FR 8441). Copies of the rule were made
available through the Internet at www.regulations.gov, by the
Department, and the Office of the Federal Register. That rule provided
a 20-day comment period which ended on February 26, 2013. Two comments
were received by the deadline.
Summary of Comments
The two comments received supported the proposed change to section
1206.31(g). One commenter made a recommendation regarding the last
sentence in section 1206.31(g) of the Order that requires foreign
producer nominees to be representative of the major countries exporting
mangos to the United States. The commenter suggested that the term
``major exporting country'' be defined. As previously stated, Mexico,
Ecuador, Brazil, Peru, Guatemala, Haiti, and Nicaragua account for 99
percent of the mango imports into the United States. This suggestion
was not part of this rulemaking and as such, should be presented to the
Board for their consideration. Accordingly, no change has been made to
this section.
This commenter also was of the view with regard to the proposed
change to section 1206.34, that the Board needs to determine the best
time each year to hold election of officers. As discussed previously,
the Board has the ability to determine an appropriate time each year to
hold election of officers within a given year; however, in order to
provide newly appointed members the opportunity to participate in
electing officers, the election should take place on or after January 1
as stated in the Order.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, the Board's
recommendation, public comments and other information, it is hereby
found that this rule, published in the Federal Register on February 6,
2013 (78 FR 8441), is consistent with and will effectuate the purposes
of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of this action until 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register because this action needs to
be in effect before the Board makes a call for nominations for the term
of office beginning January 1, 2014. Further, this action helps to
increase the pool of nominees to be considered for appointment to the
Board. Finally, the proposed rule provided for a 20-day comment period,
and the two comments received support the changes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1206
Administrative practice and procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements, Mango promotion, Reporting and
recording requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1206 is
amended as follows:
PART 1206--MANGO PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND INFORMATION ORDER
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1206 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411-7425 and 7401.
0
2. In Sec. 1206.31, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1206.31 Nominations and appointments.
* * * * *
(g) Nominees to fill the foreign producer member positions on the
Board shall be solicited from organizations of foreign mango producers
and from foreign mango
[[Page 39567]]
producers. Organizations of foreign mango producers shall submit two
nominees for each position, and foreign mango producers may submit
their name or the names of other foreign mango producers directly to
the Board. The nominees shall be representative of the major countries
exporting mangos to the United States.
* * * * *
Dated: June 26, 2013.
Rex Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-15747 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P