Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Willingness to Pay Survey for Salmon Recovery in the Willamette Watershed (New), 39282-39283 [2013-15754]
Download as PDF
39282
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
Existing rates
EXCESS ENERGY RATES
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Energy ..........................................
21:38 Jun 28, 2013
Rate Schedule P–13
(System Peaking)
Rate Schedule EE–11
(Excess Energy)
$0.0091/kWh
Southwestern’s customers and other
interested parties may receive copies of
the Integrated System Power Repayment
Studies and/or Rate Design Study, by
submitting a request to Mr. James K.
McDonald (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
A Public Information and Comment
Forum (Forum) is tentatively scheduled
to be held on July 11, 2013, to explain
to customers and interested parties the
proposed rates and supporting studies
and to allow for comment. A chairman,
who will be responsible for orderly
procedure, will conduct the Forum if a
Forum is requested. Questions
concerning the rates, studies, and
information presented at the Forum will
be answered, to the extent possible, at
the Forum. Questions not answered at
the Forum will be answered in writing.
Questions involving voluminous data
contained in Southwestern’s records
may best be answered by consultation
and review of pertinent records at
Southwestern’s offices.
Persons requesting that a Forum be
held should indicate in writing to the
Southwestern Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) by letter, email,
or facsimile transmission (918–595–
6656) by July 8, 2013, their request for
such a Forum. If no request is received,
no such Forum will be held. Persons
interested in speaking at the Forum, if
held, should submit a request to Mr.
James K. McDonald, Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer, Southwestern,
at least seven (7) calendar days prior to
the Forum so that a list of forum
participants can be developed. The
chairman may allow others to speak if
time permits.
A transcript of the Forum, if held, will
be made. Copies of the transcript and all
documents introduced will be available
for review at Southwestern’s offices (see
ADDRESSES) during normal business
hours. Copies of the transcript and all
documents introduced may also be
obtained, for a fee, from the transcribing
service.
All written comments or an electronic
copy in MS Word on the proposed
Integrated System Rates are due on or
before August 30, 2013. Comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Proposed rates
Rate Schedule P–11
(System Peaking)
GENERATION RATES
Jkt 229001
Rate Schedule EE–13
(Excess Energy)
$0.0094/kWh.
should be submitted to Mr. James K.
McDonald, Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer, Southwestern, (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Following review of the oral and
written comments and the information
gathered in the course of the
proceeding, the Administrator will
submit the finalized Integrated System
Power Repayment Studies and Rate
Design Study in support of the proposed
rates to the Deputy Secretary of Energy
for confirmation and approval on an
interim basis, and subsequently to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
for confirmation and approval on a final
basis. The Commission will allow the
public an opportunity to provide
written comments on the proposed rate
increase before making a final decision.
Dated: June 24, 2013.
Christopher M. Turner,
Administrator .
[FR Doc. 2013–15685 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–ORD–2013–0448; FRL—9825–4]
Proposed Information Collection
Request; Comment Request;
Willingness to Pay Survey for Salmon
Recovery in the Willamette Watershed
(New)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR),
‘‘Willingness to Pay Survey for Salmon
Recovery in the Willamette Watershed’’
(EPA ICR No. 2489.01, OMB Control No.
2080–NEW) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. Before
doing so, EPA is soliciting public
comments on specific aspects of the
proposed information collection as
described below. This is a request for
approval of a new collection. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
ORD–2013–0448 online using
www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Papenfus, Environmental
Protection Agency, Western Ecology
Division, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis,
OR, 97333; telephone number: 541–
754–4703; fax number: 541–754–4799;
email address:
papenfus.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will
be collecting are available in the public
docket for this ICR. The docket can be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov
or in person at the EPA Docket Center,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The telephone number for the
Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments
and information to enable it to: (i)
Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (ii) evaluate the
accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (iv) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses. EPA will consider the
comments received and amend the ICR
as appropriate. The final ICR package
will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, EPA
will issue another Federal Register
notice to announce the submission of
the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
Abstract:
The USEPA Office of Research and
Development is investigating public
values for Chinook salmon and Winter
steelhead recovery in the Willamette
basin of Oregon. These values will be
estimated via a willingness to pay mail
survey instrument. There are two
effluent-dominated perennial reaches
considered in the survey. The primary
goal of conducting economic valuation
studies should be to improve the way in
which communities frame choices
regarding the allocation of scarce
resources and to clarify the trade-offs
between alternative outcomes. This
problem is particularly relevant to
salmon conservation efforts in the
Pacific Northwest. Despite the deep
cultural importance of salmon to the
citizens of the Pacific Northwest, there
is a remarkable lack of valid empirical
economic studies quantifying this
importance to the general public. This
survey will estimate the benefits of
salmon and steelhead recovery in the
Willamette basin as outlined in the
Upper Willamette River Conservation
and Recovery Plan.
The public benefits associated with
several recovery options will be
estimated in this survey. The first
option is labeled ’minimum recovery’
and represents a permanent increase in
the number of wild origin Chinook
salmon and steelhead that return
annually to the Willamette basin
watershed. The increase in fish
abundance is also associated with a
reduction in the risk of extinction that
is great enough to ’de-list’ these species
from the endangered species list. The
second recovery status evaluated in the
survey is labeled ’broadsense recovery’.
This recovery option also represents a
reduction in extinction risk great
enough to remove both species form the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:39 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
endangered species list but also
represents an even larger increase in
wild origin fish than under the ‘minimal
recovery’ option. In addition to the
different recovery options, public
preferences for the time to recovery will
be evaluated.
For the survey, a choice experiment
framework is used with statistically
designed tradeoff questions. Recovery
options for wild origin Chinook salmon
and steelhead and time to recovery are
posed as increases in a yearly household
tax for the next 25 years. Each choice
question allows a zero cost ‘‘opt out’’
option. A few additional questions to
further understand respondent choice
motivations, their river-related
recreation behavior, and their attitudes
towards wild origin versus hatchery
origin fish are also included. Several
pages of background introduce the issue
to respondents. A small number of
sociodemographic questions are
included to gauge how well the sample
respondents represent the target
population. A sample from across the
state of Oregon will receive the survey.
The survey will target three
subpopulations of Oregon to be
studied—the urban population of the
Willamette valley, the rural population
within the Willamette valley, and the
population residing outside the
Willamette valley. The primary reason
for the survey is public value research.
All survey responses will be kept
confidential.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: The
target respondents for this survey are
representatives 18 yrs or older of
households across the state of Oregon. A
sample of household representatives 18
yrs or older will be contacted by mail
following the multiple contact protocol
in Dillman (2009). A response rate of
30% will be targeted. To increase
response rates from the sample, several
contacts will be used, including a
prenotice to all recipients, a reminder
postcard, and follow-up mailing as
needed.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Voluntary.
Estimated number of respondents:
The number of target responses from
each subpopulation within Oregon is
250 households each, or 750 households
total.
Frequency of response: One-time
response.
Total estimated burden: For a typical
respondent, a conservative estimate of
their time to review and respond to
survey questions is 30 minutes.
Assuming the target of 750 people total
respond to the survey, the burden is 375
hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39283
Total estimated cost: The Bureau of
Labor Statistics reports average wage
rates for Oregon for all occupations
(Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011). The
average hourly wage for all occupations
in Oregon was $21.75, or an average cost
per participant of $10.88. Assuming 750
participants fill out the survey, the total
estimated respondent labor cost is
$8,160. This would be a one-time
expenditure of their time.
Changes in Estimates: This is the first
notice; there is no change in estimates
at this time.
Dated: June 10, 2013.
Thomas D. Fontaine III,
Western Ecology Division Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–15754 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9829–9]
Forum on Environmental
Measurements Announcement of
Competency Policy for Assistance
Agreements—Implementation
Extension
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice. Announcement of
Implementation Extension for
Competency Policy for Assistance
Agreements.
AGENCY:
As published in the Federal
Register on April 29, 2013, the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Forum on Environmental Measurements
(FEM) is implementing a policy
requiring organizations generating or
using environmental data under certain
Agency-funded assistance agreements to
submit documentation of their
competency prior to award of the
agreement, or if that is not practicable,
prior to beginning any work involving
the generation or use of environmental
data under the agreement. The Policy
was originally approved on December
12, 2012 by the Science Technology
Policy Council (STPC). Because
implementation tools are currently
being developed by the Agency based
on outreach with internal and external
stakeholders, EPA is delaying the
required effective date of the Policy to
October 1, 2013. Webinars and materials
to aid with implementation are available
on the FEM Web site (https://
www.epa.gov/fem/lab_comp.htm).
Accordingly, this revision means that
the policy will apply to:
• Awards made under competitive
solicitations issued on or after October
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39282-39283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15754]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-ORD-2013-0448; FRL--9825-4]
Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
Willingness to Pay Survey for Salmon Recovery in the Willamette
Watershed (New)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), ``Willingness to Pay Survey for
Salmon Recovery in the Willamette Watershed'' (EPA ICR No. 2489.01, OMB
Control No. 2080-NEW) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection as described below. This is a
request for approval of a new collection. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 30, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-
2013-0448 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or
by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Papenfus, Environmental
Protection Agency, Western Ecology Division, 200 SW 35th St.,
Corvallis, OR, 97333; telephone number: 541-754-4703; fax number: 541-
754-4799; email address: papenfus.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is 202-566-1744. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the
[[Page 39283]]
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. EPA will consider the comments received and
amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be
submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR
to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
Abstract:
The USEPA Office of Research and Development is investigating
public values for Chinook salmon and Winter steelhead recovery in the
Willamette basin of Oregon. These values will be estimated via a
willingness to pay mail survey instrument. There are two effluent-
dominated perennial reaches considered in the survey. The primary goal
of conducting economic valuation studies should be to improve the way
in which communities frame choices regarding the allocation of scarce
resources and to clarify the trade-offs between alternative outcomes.
This problem is particularly relevant to salmon conservation efforts in
the Pacific Northwest. Despite the deep cultural importance of salmon
to the citizens of the Pacific Northwest, there is a remarkable lack of
valid empirical economic studies quantifying this importance to the
general public. This survey will estimate the benefits of salmon and
steelhead recovery in the Willamette basin as outlined in the Upper
Willamette River Conservation and Recovery Plan.
The public benefits associated with several recovery options will
be estimated in this survey. The first option is labeled 'minimum
recovery' and represents a permanent increase in the number of wild
origin Chinook salmon and steelhead that return annually to the
Willamette basin watershed. The increase in fish abundance is also
associated with a reduction in the risk of extinction that is great
enough to 'de-list' these species from the endangered species list. The
second recovery status evaluated in the survey is labeled 'broadsense
recovery'. This recovery option also represents a reduction in
extinction risk great enough to remove both species form the endangered
species list but also represents an even larger increase in wild origin
fish than under the `minimal recovery' option. In addition to the
different recovery options, public preferences for the time to recovery
will be evaluated.
For the survey, a choice experiment framework is used with
statistically designed tradeoff questions. Recovery options for wild
origin Chinook salmon and steelhead and time to recovery are posed as
increases in a yearly household tax for the next 25 years. Each choice
question allows a zero cost ``opt out'' option. A few additional
questions to further understand respondent choice motivations, their
river-related recreation behavior, and their attitudes towards wild
origin versus hatchery origin fish are also included. Several pages of
background introduce the issue to respondents. A small number of
sociodemographic questions are included to gauge how well the sample
respondents represent the target population. A sample from across the
state of Oregon will receive the survey. The survey will target three
subpopulations of Oregon to be studied--the urban population of the
Willamette valley, the rural population within the Willamette valley,
and the population residing outside the Willamette valley. The primary
reason for the survey is public value research. All survey responses
will be kept confidential.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: The target respondents for this
survey are representatives 18 yrs or older of households across the
state of Oregon. A sample of household representatives 18 yrs or older
will be contacted by mail following the multiple contact protocol in
Dillman (2009). A response rate of 30% will be targeted. To increase
response rates from the sample, several contacts will be used,
including a prenotice to all recipients, a reminder postcard, and
follow-up mailing as needed.
Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
Estimated number of respondents: The number of target responses
from each subpopulation within Oregon is 250 households each, or 750
households total.
Frequency of response: One-time response.
Total estimated burden: For a typical respondent, a conservative
estimate of their time to review and respond to survey questions is 30
minutes. Assuming the target of 750 people total respond to the survey,
the burden is 375 hours.
Total estimated cost: The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports
average wage rates for Oregon for all occupations (Bureau of Labor
Statistics, 2011). The average hourly wage for all occupations in
Oregon was $21.75, or an average cost per participant of $10.88.
Assuming 750 participants fill out the survey, the total estimated
respondent labor cost is $8,160. This would be a one-time expenditure
of their time.
Changes in Estimates: This is the first notice; there is no change
in estimates at this time.
Dated: June 10, 2013.
Thomas D. Fontaine III,
Western Ecology Division Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-15754 Filed 6-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P