Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-DVD Copy Control Association, 39327 [2013-15641]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
venture and (2) the nature and
objectives of the venture. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
actual damages under specified
circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.,
Mountain View, CA; Arista Networks
Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Big Switch
Networks, Mountain View, CA; Brocade
Communications Systems, Inc., San
Jose, CA; Ciena Corporation, Hanover,
MD; Cisco Systems Inc., San Jose, CA;
Citrix Systems, Inc., Santa Clara, CA;
Cyan Inc., Petaluma, CA; Dell Inc.,
Round Rock, TX; Ericsson Inc., San Jose,
CA; Fujitsu Limited, Kawasaki, JAPAN;
Hewlett Packard Company, Palo Alto,
CA; Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.,
Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; International Business
Machines Inc., Endicott, NY; Inocybe
Technologies Inc., Gatineau, Quebec
City, CANADA; Intel Corporation, Santa
Clara, CA; Juniper Networks,
Sunnyvale, CA; Microsoft Corporation,
Redmond, WA; NEC Corporation,
Tokyo, JAPAN; PLUMgrid Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA; Radware LTD, Telaviv,
ISRAEL; Red Hat Inc., Raleigh, NC; and
VMware Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
The general area of OpenDaylight’s
planned activity is to (a) Advance the
creation, evolution, promotion, and
support of an open source software
defined network software platform
(‘‘Platform’’); (b) support and maintain
the strategic framework of the Platform
through the technologies made available
by the organization to make the Platform
a success; (c) support and maintain
policies set by the Board; (d) promote
such Platform worldwide; and (e)
undertake such other activities as may
from time to time be appropriate to
further the purposes and achieve the
goals set forth above.
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control
Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Hakuto Taiwan Ltd., Taipei, TAIWAN,
has been added as a party to this
venture.
Also, Dongguan ChuDong Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong,
People’s Republic of China; Huizhou
Aihua Multimedia Co., Ltd.,
Guangdong, People’s Republic of China;
and Kentec, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and DVD CCA
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on February 20, 2013. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 21, 2013 (78 FR 17431).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–15641 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
Drug Enforcement Administration
[FR Doc. 2013–15640 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
Bio Diagnostic International; Denial of
Application
[Docket No. 11–63]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on May
31, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:38 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
On June 8, 2011, the Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Bio Diagnostic
International, Inc. (hereinafter, BDI or
Respondent), of Brea, California. The
Show Cause Order proposed the denial
of Respondent’s application for a
registration as a distributor of list I
chemicals, on the ground that
Respondent’s registration ‘‘would be
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39327
inconsistent with the public interest.’’
Show Cause Order at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C.
823(h) and 824(a)(4)).
The Show Cause Order specifically
alleged that on September 1, 2009,
Respondent had applied for a DEA
registration as a distributor of iodine, a
list I chemical. Id. The Order alleged
that Mr. Paul Anand, Ph.D., was
Respondent’s owner and operator, and
that during a pre-registration
investigation, he had failed to provide a
Food and Drug Administration
registration, that he had failed to obtain
a California Department of Justice
Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement
Controlled Chemical Substances Permit,
and that he had ‘‘failed to accurately
complete’’ employee screening forms as
requested by Agency Investigators. Id. at
1–2. The Order also alleged that during
the inspection, ‘‘investigators
discovered that approximately 50 to 100
expired bottles of Lugol’s solution, a
product containing . . . [i]odine, were
left unsecured on a shelf within BDI’s
proposed controlled location without a
proper registration’’ and that ‘‘BDI failed
to record, secure, or dispose of the
expired list I chemical products as
required by law.’’ Id. at 2. Finally, the
Order alleged that ‘‘[o]n December 8,
2010 . . . state investigators attempted
to conduct a site inspection at BDI’s
business facility’’ but that they ‘‘were
not successful because BDI did not
cooperate with attempts to conduct this
inspection.’’ Id.
On June 27, Mr. Anand filed a request
for a hearing on behalf of Respondent
and the matter was placed on the docket
of the Office of Administrative Law
Judges (ALJ). Thereafter, the assigned
ALJ issued an order for pre-hearing
statements; both parties complied with
the order.
In its pre-hearing statement, the
Government provided notice that one of
its witnesses would testify that
‘‘Respondent is required to have a valid
California Board of Pharmacy license
. . . or a California Bureau of Narcotic
Enforcement permit . . . and . . .
Respondent’s state permit expired on
June 11, 2011 and was not renewed.’’
Gov. Pre-Hearing Statement, at 6–7. The
Government noticed that its witness
would further testify that ‘‘currently the
Respondent is not authorized to handle
list I chemicals in the State of
California.’’ Id. at 7.
Based on the above, the ALJ issued a
Memorandum to Parties and Order.
Therein, the ALJ ordered the parties to
address two issues: (1) whether the
‘‘Respondent presently possess[es] a
valid . . . state license, registration or
other authority to handle listed
chemicals, to include list I chemicals,
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15641]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association
Notice is hereby given that, on May 31, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control Association
(``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Hakuto Taiwan Ltd., Taipei, TAIWAN, has been added as a
party to this venture.
Also, Dongguan ChuDong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong,
People's Republic of China; Huizhou Aihua Multimedia Co., Ltd.,
Guangdong, People's Republic of China; and Kentec, Inc., Taipei,
Taiwan, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with the Department on February 20,
2013. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 21, 2013 (78 FR 17431).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-15641 Filed 6-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
