Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Opendaylight Project, Inc., 39326-39327 [2013-15640]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
39326
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments are encouraged and will be
accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until August
30, 2013. This process is conducted in
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10.
Written comments concerning this
information collection should be sent to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer. The best
way to ensure your comments are
received is to email them to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
them to 202–395–7285. All comments
should reference the 8 digit OMB
number for the collection or the title of
the collection. If you have questions
concerning the collection, please Cathy
Poston, Office on Violence Against
Women, at 202–514–5430 or the DOJ
Desk Officer at 202–395–3176.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Certification of Compliance with the
Statutory Eligibility Requirements of the
Violence Against Women Act as
Amended’’ for Applicants to the STOP
Formula Grant Program.
(2) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form Number: 1122–0001.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office on
Violence Against Women.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
VerDate Mar<15>2010
22:39 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
abstract: Primary: The affected public
includes STOP formula grantees (50
states, the District of Columbia and five
territories (Guam, Puerto Rico,
American Samoa, Virgin Islands,
Northern Mariana Islands). The STOP
Violence Against Women Formula Grant
Program was authorized through the
Violence Against Women Act of 1994
and reauthorized and amended by the
Violence Against Women Act of 2000
and the Violence Against Women Act of
2005. The purpose of the STOP Formula
Grant Program is to promote a
coordinated, multi-disciplinary
approach to improving the criminal
justice system’s response to violence
against women. It envisions a
partnership among law enforcement,
prosecution, courts, and victim
advocacy organizations to enhance
victim safety and hold offenders
accountable for their crimes of violence
against women. The Department of
Justice’s Office on Violence Against
Women (OVW) administers the STOP
Formula Grant Program funds which
must be distributed by STOP state
administrators according to statutory
formula (as amended by VAWA 2000
and VAWA 2005).
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond/reply: It is estimated that it will
take the approximately 56 respondents
(state administrators from the STOP
Formula Grant Program) less than one
hour to complete a Certification of
Compliance with the Statutory
Eligibility Requirements of the Violence
Against Women Act, as Amended.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total annual hour burden
to complete the Certification is less than
56 hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 1407B,
Washington, DC 20530.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Dated: June 25, 2013.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
Notice is hereby given that, on May
23, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), OpenDaylight
Project, Inc. (‘‘OpenDaylight’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
(1) the identities of the parties to the
[FR Doc. 2013–15568 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant To the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers
Notice is hereby given that, on May
31, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Institute of
Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(‘‘IEEE’’) has filed written notifications
simultaneously with the Attorney
General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing additions or
changes to its standards development
activities. The notifications were filed
for the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, 26 new standards have
been initiated and 19 existing standards
are being revised. More detail regarding
these changes can be found at https://
standards.ieee.org/about/sba/
feb2013.html, https://standards.ieee.org/
about/sba/mar2013.html and https://
standards.ieee.org/about/sba/
may2013.html.
On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on January 11, 2013. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 7, 2013 (78 FR 9069).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–15639 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant To the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Opendaylight Project, Inc.
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2013 / Notices
venture and (2) the nature and
objectives of the venture. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to
actual damages under specified
circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act,
the identities of the parties to the
venture are: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.,
Mountain View, CA; Arista Networks
Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Big Switch
Networks, Mountain View, CA; Brocade
Communications Systems, Inc., San
Jose, CA; Ciena Corporation, Hanover,
MD; Cisco Systems Inc., San Jose, CA;
Citrix Systems, Inc., Santa Clara, CA;
Cyan Inc., Petaluma, CA; Dell Inc.,
Round Rock, TX; Ericsson Inc., San Jose,
CA; Fujitsu Limited, Kawasaki, JAPAN;
Hewlett Packard Company, Palo Alto,
CA; Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.,
Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; International Business
Machines Inc., Endicott, NY; Inocybe
Technologies Inc., Gatineau, Quebec
City, CANADA; Intel Corporation, Santa
Clara, CA; Juniper Networks,
Sunnyvale, CA; Microsoft Corporation,
Redmond, WA; NEC Corporation,
Tokyo, JAPAN; PLUMgrid Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA; Radware LTD, Telaviv,
ISRAEL; Red Hat Inc., Raleigh, NC; and
VMware Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
The general area of OpenDaylight’s
planned activity is to (a) Advance the
creation, evolution, promotion, and
support of an open source software
defined network software platform
(‘‘Platform’’); (b) support and maintain
the strategic framework of the Platform
through the technologies made available
by the organization to make the Platform
a success; (c) support and maintain
policies set by the Board; (d) promote
such Platform worldwide; and (e)
undertake such other activities as may
from time to time be appropriate to
further the purposes and achieve the
goals set forth above.
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), DVD Copy Control
Association (‘‘DVD CCA’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Hakuto Taiwan Ltd., Taipei, TAIWAN,
has been added as a party to this
venture.
Also, Dongguan ChuDong Electronic
Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong,
People’s Republic of China; Huizhou
Aihua Multimedia Co., Ltd.,
Guangdong, People’s Republic of China;
and Kentec, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and DVD CCA
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on February 20, 2013. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 21, 2013 (78 FR 17431).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–15641 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
Drug Enforcement Administration
[FR Doc. 2013–15640 Filed 6–28–13; 8:45 am]
Bio Diagnostic International; Denial of
Application
[Docket No. 11–63]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—DVD Copy Control
Association
Notice is hereby given that, on May
31, 2013, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:38 Jun 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
On June 8, 2011, the Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Bio Diagnostic
International, Inc. (hereinafter, BDI or
Respondent), of Brea, California. The
Show Cause Order proposed the denial
of Respondent’s application for a
registration as a distributor of list I
chemicals, on the ground that
Respondent’s registration ‘‘would be
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39327
inconsistent with the public interest.’’
Show Cause Order at 1 (citing 21 U.S.C.
823(h) and 824(a)(4)).
The Show Cause Order specifically
alleged that on September 1, 2009,
Respondent had applied for a DEA
registration as a distributor of iodine, a
list I chemical. Id. The Order alleged
that Mr. Paul Anand, Ph.D., was
Respondent’s owner and operator, and
that during a pre-registration
investigation, he had failed to provide a
Food and Drug Administration
registration, that he had failed to obtain
a California Department of Justice
Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement
Controlled Chemical Substances Permit,
and that he had ‘‘failed to accurately
complete’’ employee screening forms as
requested by Agency Investigators. Id. at
1–2. The Order also alleged that during
the inspection, ‘‘investigators
discovered that approximately 50 to 100
expired bottles of Lugol’s solution, a
product containing . . . [i]odine, were
left unsecured on a shelf within BDI’s
proposed controlled location without a
proper registration’’ and that ‘‘BDI failed
to record, secure, or dispose of the
expired list I chemical products as
required by law.’’ Id. at 2. Finally, the
Order alleged that ‘‘[o]n December 8,
2010 . . . state investigators attempted
to conduct a site inspection at BDI’s
business facility’’ but that they ‘‘were
not successful because BDI did not
cooperate with attempts to conduct this
inspection.’’ Id.
On June 27, Mr. Anand filed a request
for a hearing on behalf of Respondent
and the matter was placed on the docket
of the Office of Administrative Law
Judges (ALJ). Thereafter, the assigned
ALJ issued an order for pre-hearing
statements; both parties complied with
the order.
In its pre-hearing statement, the
Government provided notice that one of
its witnesses would testify that
‘‘Respondent is required to have a valid
California Board of Pharmacy license
. . . or a California Bureau of Narcotic
Enforcement permit . . . and . . .
Respondent’s state permit expired on
June 11, 2011 and was not renewed.’’
Gov. Pre-Hearing Statement, at 6–7. The
Government noticed that its witness
would further testify that ‘‘currently the
Respondent is not authorized to handle
list I chemicals in the State of
California.’’ Id. at 7.
Based on the above, the ALJ issued a
Memorandum to Parties and Order.
Therein, the ALJ ordered the parties to
address two issues: (1) whether the
‘‘Respondent presently possess[es] a
valid . . . state license, registration or
other authority to handle listed
chemicals, to include list I chemicals,
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39326-39327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15640]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant To the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Opendaylight Project, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on May 23, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), OpenDaylight Project, Inc.
(``OpenDaylight'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1)
the identities of the parties to the
[[Page 39327]]
venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual
damages under specified circumstances.
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties
to the venture are: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Mountain View, CA; Arista
Networks Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Big Switch Networks, Mountain View, CA;
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA; Ciena Corporation,
Hanover, MD; Cisco Systems Inc., San Jose, CA; Citrix Systems, Inc.,
Santa Clara, CA; Cyan Inc., Petaluma, CA; Dell Inc., Round Rock, TX;
Ericsson Inc., San Jose, CA; Fujitsu Limited, Kawasaki, JAPAN; Hewlett
Packard Company, Palo Alto, CA; Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Shenzhen,
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; International Business Machines Inc.,
Endicott, NY; Inocybe Technologies Inc., Gatineau, Quebec City, CANADA;
Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; Juniper Networks, Sunnyvale, CA;
Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA; NEC Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN;
PLUMgrid Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Radware LTD, Telaviv, ISRAEL; Red Hat
Inc., Raleigh, NC; and VMware Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
The general area of OpenDaylight's planned activity is to (a)
Advance the creation, evolution, promotion, and support of an open
source software defined network software platform (``Platform''); (b)
support and maintain the strategic framework of the Platform through
the technologies made available by the organization to make the
Platform a success; (c) support and maintain policies set by the Board;
(d) promote such Platform worldwide; and (e) undertake such other
activities as may from time to time be appropriate to further the
purposes and achieve the goals set forth above.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-15640 Filed 6-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
