Re-establishing the Sanctuary Nomination Process, 38848-38850 [2013-15488]
Download as PDF
38848
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
deleted promptly. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1207
Advertising, Agricultural research,
Imports, Potatoes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 1207 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1207—POTATO RESEARCH
AND PROMOTION PLAN
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1207 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2611–2627 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
§ 1207.501
[Removed and Reserved]
2. Section 1207.501 is removed and
reserved.
■ 3. Section 1207.507(a) is revised to
read as follows:
■
§ 1207.507
Administrative Committee.
(a) The Board shall annually select
from among its members an
Administrative Committee composed of
producer members as provided for in
the Board’s bylaws, one or more
importer members, and the public
member. Selection shall be made in
such manner as the Board may
prescribe: Except that such committee
shall include the Chairperson and nine
Vice-Chairpersons, one of whom shall
also serve as the Secretary and Treasurer
of the Board.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 24, 2013.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–15578 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 130405334–3334–01]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 0648–BD20
Re-establishing the Sanctuary
Nomination Process
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
public comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:11 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
NOAA’s ONMS is
announcing that it is re-establishing the
sanctuary nomination process and is
proposing to amend its regulations
governing the process for nominating
and evaluating sites for eligibility as a
national marine sanctuary. This action
would replace the currently inactive
Sanctuary Evaluation List (SEL) with a
new process for local communities and
other interested parties to provide
NOAA with robust, criteria-driven
proposals for new national marine
sanctuaries. To implement this process,
NOAA is seeking public comment on
proposed changes to the sanctuary
nomination and designation procedures,
and on the criteria by which the agency
would analyze nominations for
potential new national marine
sanctuaries. Once these criteria have
been made final, NOAA intends to
solicit nominations for areas of the
marine and Great Lakes environments
that satisfy those criteria for possible
designation as a national marine
sanctuary.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received no later than August
27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 0648–BD20, by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-20130091, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Matt Brookhart, Chief, Policy
& Planning Division, Office of National
Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 East-West
Highway, 11th Floor, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
All comments received are a part of
the public record and will be posted to
https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
ONMS will accept anonymous
comments (for electronic comments
submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, enter N/A in the
required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Brookhart, Chief, Policy & Planning
Division, NOAA Office of National
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 East-West
Highway, 11th Floor, Silver Spring, MD
20910, (301) 713–7247.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is
also accessible via the Internet at
https://www.access.gpo.gov/su-docs/
aces/aces140.html.
I. Background
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA or Act, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.)
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce
to, among other things, identify and
designate as national marine sanctuaries
areas of the marine environment,
including the Great Lakes, which are of
special national significance; to manage
these areas as the National Marine
Sanctuary System (NMSS); and to
provide for the comprehensive and
coordinated conservation and
management of these areas and the
activities affecting them in a manner
which complements existing regulatory
authorities. Section 1433 of the NMSA
provides sanctuary designation
standards and factors to consider in
determining whether an area qualifies
for consideration as a potential
sanctuary, and section 1434 establishes
procedures for sanctuary designation
and implementation. Day-to-day
management of the NMSS has been
delegated by the Secretary to the ONMS.
Regulations implementing the NMSA
and each sanctuary are codified in Title
15 Part 922 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR).
NOAA first developed a formal
process for identifying and evaluating
sites for consideration as potential
national marine sanctuaries in the late
1970s. In 1983, NOAA replaced this
process with the Site Evaluation List
(SEL) (48 FR 24295). As described in
NOAA regulations at 15 CFR 922.3, the
SEL was a list of natural and historical
marine resource sites selected by the
Secretary as qualifying for further
evaluation for possible designation as
national marine sanctuaries. The SEL
included detailed criteria, relied on
regional review panels, and was
intended to be reviewed and updated
every five years. When it was published
in 1983, the SEL included 29 sites (48
FR 35568), four of which were
subsequently designated as sanctuaries:
Flower Garden Banks (1991), Stellwagen
Bank (1992), Western Washington Outer
Coast (renamed Olympic Coast, 1994),
and Thunder Bay (2000) national
marine sanctuaries (NMS). The list of
sites on the SEL can be found at
https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/
management/fr/54_fr_53432.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
When the SEL was established, the
criteria for nominating sites to the list
focused primarily on the natural
resource qualities that made an area
eligible for sanctuary designation. The
Marine Sanctuaries Amendments Act of
1984 (Pub. L. 98–496) added historical,
research and educational qualities to the
list of designation criteria. In 1988,
NOAA issued a final rule (53 FR 43801)
reflecting these amendments and, in
1989, announced that it would consider
new sites for the SEL consistent with
these revised criteria (54 FR 53432).
In 1995, the ONMS Director
deactivated the SEL (60 FR 66875) to
focus on management of the existing
sanctuaries, which at that time there
were a total of twelve national marine
sanctuaries. Since then, only one
national marine sanctuary, Thunder Bay
National Marine Sanctuary, has been
added to the NMSS. Public interest in
the designation of new national marine
sanctuaries has, however, remained
strong. A variety of individuals, local,
state, and tribal governments, academic
institutions, citizen groups, and nongovernment organizations from coastal
communities around the country have
requested NOAA, the Department of
Commerce, and the President to
consider designating additional
sanctuaries. These requests often
reference the many and diverse benefits
that coastal communities realize from an
adjacent national marine sanctuary,
including, but not limited to:
Meaningful protection of nationally
significant marine resources; significant
social and economic benefits from
expanded travel, tourism, and
recreation, as well as ocean-related jobs;
increased opportunity for, and access to,
federal research focused on local marine
resources; education programs to
promote ocean literacy, sustainable
uses, and stewardship; and communitydriven problem solving for a myriad of
ocean issues.
II. Description of Action
The purpose of this proposed
rulemaking is to:
(1) Provide public notice that NOAA
is re-establishing the public process to
nominate areas of the marine and Great
Lakes environments for consideration as
national marine sanctuaries;
(2) Seek public comment on proposed
changes to various sections of the
ONMS regulations at 15 CFR 922; and
(3) Seek public comment on the
criteria and process NOAA proposes
using to evaluate new sanctuary
nominations.
This proposed rule proposes criteria,
process, and regulatory changes
necessary to provide the American
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:11 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
public an opportunity to nominate
marine areas that NOAA may consider
for designation as a national marine
sanctuary. This new sanctuary
nomination process intends to focus on
proposals generated and driven by local
and regional community groups and
coalitions. As such, it would replace the
old SEL process—which tended towards
an agency-driven, ‘‘top-down’’
approach—with a more grassroots,
‘‘bottom-up’’ approach to sanctuary
nominations. NOAA is, therefore,
proposing to remove all terminology
referencing the SEL in order to ensure
that the sanctuary nomination process
ultimately implemented by NOAA is
more community driven, open to public
input and analysis, and that any sites
ultimately designated as national
marine sanctuaries have widespread
community support. NOAA will begin
accepting new nominations following
issuance of a final rule, which will be
published after consideration of public
comment on the proposed criteria and
regulations below. NOAA is not
accepting nominations for new national
marine sanctuaries at this time, nor is it
considering evaluation of sites from the
deactivated SEL. If NOAA determines
that a nominated site meets the final
criteria, the agency may then choose to
begin the public process for national
marine sanctuary designation.
The public may re-nominate sites
from the deactivated SEL, per the final
evaluation criteria, and resubmit these
areas for NOAA’s consideration. The
final criteria will be consistent with the
existing standards in section 303(b) of
the NMSA, but they may not mirror
them exactly. In deciding to pursue an
eligible site for designation, NOAA can,
and will, contemplate additional criteria
or clarifications of existing criteria, such
as the ONMS’ fiscal capability to
manage any area as a national marine
sanctuary. Ultimately, the agency seeks
to have the most robust means possible
for designating areas of special national
significance as new national marine
sanctuaries.
III. Request for Public Comments
NOAA requests public comment on:
(1) The completeness and utility of the
following twelve criteria for evaluating
areas of the marine environment as
possible new national marine
sanctuaries; (2) NOAA’s proposed
process steps for receiving sanctuary
nominations; and (3) proposed
amendments to ONMS regulations.
Proposed Nomination Criteria
NOAA will analyze the comments on
these criteria and any additional criteria
proposed by the public and publish the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38849
final evaluation criteria in its final rule
on this process. The twelve criteria
NOAA proposes to evaluate ares of the
marine environment as possible new
national marine sanctuaries are:
(1) The area’s natural resource and
ecological qualities, including its
contribution to biological productivity,
maintenance of ecosystem structure,
maintenance of ecologically or
commercially important or threatened
species or species assemblages,
maintenance of critical habitat of
endangered species, and the
biogeographic representation of the site.
(2) The area’s historical, cultural,
archaeological, or paleontological
significance.
(3) The present and potential uses of
the area that depend on maintenance of
the area’s resources, including
commercial and recreational fishing,
subsistence uses, other commercial and
recreational activities, and research and
education.
(4) The present and potential
activities that may adversely affect the
significance, values, qualities, resources
and uses identified above.
(5) The existing State and Federal
regulatory and management authorities
applicable to the area and the adequacy
of those authorities to fulfill the
purposes and policies of the NMSA.
(6) The manageability of the area,
including such factors as its size, its
ability to be identified as a discrete
ecological unit with definable
boundaries, its accessibility, and its
suitability for monitoring and
enforcement activities.
(7) The public benefits to be derived
from sanctuary status, with emphasis on
the benefits of long-term protection of
nationally significant resources, vital
habitats, and resources which generate
tourism.
(8) The negative impacts produced by
management restrictions on incomegenerating activities such as living and
nonliving resources development.
(9) The socioeconomic effects of
sanctuary designation.
(10) The area’s scientific value and
value for monitoring the resources and
natural processes that occur there.
(11) The feasibility of employing
innovative management approaches to
protect sanctuary resources or to
manage compatible uses.
(12) The value of the area as an
addition to the System.
Proposed Sanctuary Nomination
Process
As part of the new sanctuary
nomination process, NOAA is
contemplating the following procedures
and protocols:
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
38850
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 125 / Friday, June 28, 2013 / Proposed Rules
(1) A nomination must have broad
community support, including a
combination of such entities as local
government organizations, elected
officials, tribes, stakeholder groups (e.g.,
industry or non-governmental
organizations), or academia.
(2) In nominating an area for national
marine sanctuary consideration, a
coalition of advocates should strive to
provide documentation and/or analyses
that address as many of the final
evaluation criteria as possible. (NOAA
will publish the final evaluation criteria
in its final rule on this process.)
(3) NOAA will maintain a publically
transparent inventory on the ONMS
Web site of those nominations that have
successfully demonstrated eligibility for
national marine sanctuary designation.
These nominations would not
automatically equate to sanctuary
designation.
(4) NOAA would implement any new
sanctuary designation as a separate
process from the nomination process,
and under the highly participatory
standards enacted by the NMSA and the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA).
Proposed Regulatory Amendments
In this rulemaking, NOAA proposes to
revise 15 CFR 922.10 to codify a
statement that NOAA is once again
accepting nominations for national
marine sanctuary designation. NOAA is
also proposing to eliminate all
regulations related to the SEL by
removing 15 CFR 922.21 and 922.23,
and removing SEL from the Definitions
section at 15 CFR 922.3.
Note that, through a separate
rulemaking action (78 FR 5998, January
28, 2013), NOAA is also proposing to
revise regulations regarding the SEL as
part of a comprehensive regulatory
review pursuant to Executive Order
13563. NOAA will resolve any
inconsistencies between these two rules
in the respective final rules.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Classification
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. A description of this action, its
purpose, and its legal basis are
described in the preamble to this
proposed rule and is not repeated here.
The factual basis for this certification is
as follows:
This rule proposes administrative
changes to the regulations. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:11 Jun 27, 2013
Jkt 229001
proposed action will only modify the
procedural regulations to reactivate the
sanctuary nomination process and set
forth the nomination process and
evaluation criteria for evaluating areas
of the marine environment as possible
new national marine sanctuaries.
The types of small entities that may
be impacted by this rulemaking are local
government organizations, tribes,
stakeholder groups (e.g., industry or
non-governmental organizations), or
academia who wish to nominate areas of
the marine environment for
consideration as a national marine
sanctuary. The agency, however, does
not currently have data reflecting how
many of these entities would submit
nominations for possible designation as
a new national marine sanctuary, but it
anticipates that it would be a very small
number. The impacts of this rulemaking
would also be very small, as the
proposed provisions merely set forth the
proposed nomination process and
evaluation criteria. The submission of
nominations is purely voluntary, and
this rulemaking does not impose any
costs or requirements beyond those
related to the preparation of
documentation in support of the
nomination. This action does not
include any decisions or determinations
on future sanctuary site designations.
The impact of future potential national
marine sanctuary designations will be
evaluated individually on a case-by-case
basis and will be subject to a Regulatory
Flexibility Act review at that time.
Therefore, it is not expected that the
modifications of the regulations at 15
CFR 922.10 will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule does not establish
any new reporting, record-keeping, or
other compliance requirements.
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This proposed rule has been
determined to not be significant within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
Dated: June 24, 2013.
Holly A. Bamford,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services
and Coastal Zone Management.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, NOAA proposes to amend 15
CFR part 922 as follows:
PART 922—NATIONAL MARINE
SANCTUARY PROGRAM
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 922
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
2. Amend § 922.3 by removing the
definitions of ‘‘Active Candidate’’ and
‘‘Site Evaluation List.’’
■ 3. Revise Subpart B to part 922 to read
as follows:
■
Subpart B—Sanctuary Nomination
Process
§ 922.10
(a) The sanctuary nomination process
is currently active.
(b) To find out how to submit a
nomination, contact ONMS by visiting
www.sanctuaries.noaa.gov.
(c) The Director will evaluate all
nominations according to the criteria
identified in section 303(b) of the
National Marine Sanctuaries Act,
Sanctuary Designation Standards (16
U.S.C. 1433), and any further guidance
issued by NOAA.
(d) The Director will maintain a
publically available inventory of sites
that NOAA has determined to be
eligible for sanctuary designation.
(e) A determination that a site is
eligible for sanctuary designation, by
itself shall not subject the site to any
regulatory control under the Act. Such
controls may only be imposed after
designation.
Subpart C—Designation of National
Marine Sanctuaries
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 922
§ 922.21
Administrative practice and
procedure, Amendments, Appeals,
Appellant, Application requirements,
Authorizations, Definitions,
Designation, Environmental protection,
Marine resources, Motorized personal
watercraft, Natural resources,
Permitting, Permit procedures,
Prohibited activities, Special use permit,
Stowed and not available for immediate
use, Resources, Research, Traditional
fishing, Water resources.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
General.
4. Remove and reserve § 922.21.
§ 922.23
■
[Removed and Reserved]
[Removed and Reserved]
5. Remove and reserve § 922.23.
[FR Doc. 2013–15488 Filed 6–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38848-38850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15488]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 130405334-3334-01]
RIN 0648-BD20
Re-establishing the Sanctuary Nomination Process
AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for public comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NOAA's ONMS is announcing that it is re-establishing the
sanctuary nomination process and is proposing to amend its regulations
governing the process for nominating and evaluating sites for
eligibility as a national marine sanctuary. This action would replace
the currently inactive Sanctuary Evaluation List (SEL) with a new
process for local communities and other interested parties to provide
NOAA with robust, criteria-driven proposals for new national marine
sanctuaries. To implement this process, NOAA is seeking public comment
on proposed changes to the sanctuary nomination and designation
procedures, and on the criteria by which the agency would analyze
nominations for potential new national marine sanctuaries. Once these
criteria have been made final, NOAA intends to solicit nominations for
areas of the marine and Great Lakes environments that satisfy those
criteria for possible designation as a national marine sanctuary.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received no later than
August 27, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 0648-BD20, by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-2013-0091, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields and enter or attach
your comments.
Mail: Matt Brookhart, Chief, Policy & Planning Division,
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 East-West Highway, 11th
Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will be
posted to https://www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal
Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information. ONMS will accept anonymous comments (for electronic
comments submitted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, enter N/A in
the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Brookhart, Chief, Policy &
Planning Division, NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, 1305
East-West Highway, 11th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910, (301) 713-7247.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This Federal Register document is also accessible via the Internet
at https://www.access.gpo.gov/su-docs/aces/aces140.html.
I. Background
The National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA or Act, 16 U.S.C. 1431 et
seq.) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to, among other things,
identify and designate as national marine sanctuaries areas of the
marine environment, including the Great Lakes, which are of special
national significance; to manage these areas as the National Marine
Sanctuary System (NMSS); and to provide for the comprehensive and
coordinated conservation and management of these areas and the
activities affecting them in a manner which complements existing
regulatory authorities. Section 1433 of the NMSA provides sanctuary
designation standards and factors to consider in determining whether an
area qualifies for consideration as a potential sanctuary, and section
1434 establishes procedures for sanctuary designation and
implementation. Day-to-day management of the NMSS has been delegated by
the Secretary to the ONMS. Regulations implementing the NMSA and each
sanctuary are codified in Title 15 Part 922 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR).
NOAA first developed a formal process for identifying and
evaluating sites for consideration as potential national marine
sanctuaries in the late 1970s. In 1983, NOAA replaced this process with
the Site Evaluation List (SEL) (48 FR 24295). As described in NOAA
regulations at 15 CFR 922.3, the SEL was a list of natural and
historical marine resource sites selected by the Secretary as
qualifying for further evaluation for possible designation as national
marine sanctuaries. The SEL included detailed criteria, relied on
regional review panels, and was intended to be reviewed and updated
every five years. When it was published in 1983, the SEL included 29
sites (48 FR 35568), four of which were subsequently designated as
sanctuaries: Flower Garden Banks (1991), Stellwagen Bank (1992),
Western Washington Outer Coast (renamed Olympic Coast, 1994), and
Thunder Bay (2000) national marine sanctuaries (NMS). The list of sites
on the SEL can be found at https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/management/fr/54_fr_53432.pdf.
[[Page 38849]]
When the SEL was established, the criteria for nominating sites to
the list focused primarily on the natural resource qualities that made
an area eligible for sanctuary designation. The Marine Sanctuaries
Amendments Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-496) added historical, research and
educational qualities to the list of designation criteria. In 1988,
NOAA issued a final rule (53 FR 43801) reflecting these amendments and,
in 1989, announced that it would consider new sites for the SEL
consistent with these revised criteria (54 FR 53432).
In 1995, the ONMS Director deactivated the SEL (60 FR 66875) to
focus on management of the existing sanctuaries, which at that time
there were a total of twelve national marine sanctuaries. Since then,
only one national marine sanctuary, Thunder Bay National Marine
Sanctuary, has been added to the NMSS. Public interest in the
designation of new national marine sanctuaries has, however, remained
strong. A variety of individuals, local, state, and tribal governments,
academic institutions, citizen groups, and non-government organizations
from coastal communities around the country have requested NOAA, the
Department of Commerce, and the President to consider designating
additional sanctuaries. These requests often reference the many and
diverse benefits that coastal communities realize from an adjacent
national marine sanctuary, including, but not limited to: Meaningful
protection of nationally significant marine resources; significant
social and economic benefits from expanded travel, tourism, and
recreation, as well as ocean-related jobs; increased opportunity for,
and access to, federal research focused on local marine resources;
education programs to promote ocean literacy, sustainable uses, and
stewardship; and community-driven problem solving for a myriad of ocean
issues.
II. Description of Action
The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to:
(1) Provide public notice that NOAA is re-establishing the public
process to nominate areas of the marine and Great Lakes environments
for consideration as national marine sanctuaries;
(2) Seek public comment on proposed changes to various sections of
the ONMS regulations at 15 CFR 922; and
(3) Seek public comment on the criteria and process NOAA proposes
using to evaluate new sanctuary nominations.
This proposed rule proposes criteria, process, and regulatory
changes necessary to provide the American public an opportunity to
nominate marine areas that NOAA may consider for designation as a
national marine sanctuary. This new sanctuary nomination process
intends to focus on proposals generated and driven by local and
regional community groups and coalitions. As such, it would replace the
old SEL process--which tended towards an agency-driven, ``top-down''
approach--with a more grassroots, ``bottom-up'' approach to sanctuary
nominations. NOAA is, therefore, proposing to remove all terminology
referencing the SEL in order to ensure that the sanctuary nomination
process ultimately implemented by NOAA is more community driven, open
to public input and analysis, and that any sites ultimately designated
as national marine sanctuaries have widespread community support. NOAA
will begin accepting new nominations following issuance of a final
rule, which will be published after consideration of public comment on
the proposed criteria and regulations below. NOAA is not accepting
nominations for new national marine sanctuaries at this time, nor is it
considering evaluation of sites from the deactivated SEL. If NOAA
determines that a nominated site meets the final criteria, the agency
may then choose to begin the public process for national marine
sanctuary designation.
The public may re-nominate sites from the deactivated SEL, per the
final evaluation criteria, and resubmit these areas for NOAA's
consideration. The final criteria will be consistent with the existing
standards in section 303(b) of the NMSA, but they may not mirror them
exactly. In deciding to pursue an eligible site for designation, NOAA
can, and will, contemplate additional criteria or clarifications of
existing criteria, such as the ONMS' fiscal capability to manage any
area as a national marine sanctuary. Ultimately, the agency seeks to
have the most robust means possible for designating areas of special
national significance as new national marine sanctuaries.
III. Request for Public Comments
NOAA requests public comment on: (1) The completeness and utility
of the following twelve criteria for evaluating areas of the marine
environment as possible new national marine sanctuaries; (2) NOAA's
proposed process steps for receiving sanctuary nominations; and (3)
proposed amendments to ONMS regulations.
Proposed Nomination Criteria
NOAA will analyze the comments on these criteria and any additional
criteria proposed by the public and publish the final evaluation
criteria in its final rule on this process. The twelve criteria NOAA
proposes to evaluate ares of the marine environment as possible new
national marine sanctuaries are:
(1) The area's natural resource and ecological qualities, including
its contribution to biological productivity, maintenance of ecosystem
structure, maintenance of ecologically or commercially important or
threatened species or species assemblages, maintenance of critical
habitat of endangered species, and the biogeographic representation of
the site.
(2) The area's historical, cultural, archaeological, or
paleontological significance.
(3) The present and potential uses of the area that depend on
maintenance of the area's resources, including commercial and
recreational fishing, subsistence uses, other commercial and
recreational activities, and research and education.
(4) The present and potential activities that may adversely affect
the significance, values, qualities, resources and uses identified
above.
(5) The existing State and Federal regulatory and management
authorities applicable to the area and the adequacy of those
authorities to fulfill the purposes and policies of the NMSA.
(6) The manageability of the area, including such factors as its
size, its ability to be identified as a discrete ecological unit with
definable boundaries, its accessibility, and its suitability for
monitoring and enforcement activities.
(7) The public benefits to be derived from sanctuary status, with
emphasis on the benefits of long-term protection of nationally
significant resources, vital habitats, and resources which generate
tourism.
(8) The negative impacts produced by management restrictions on
income-generating activities such as living and nonliving resources
development.
(9) The socioeconomic effects of sanctuary designation.
(10) The area's scientific value and value for monitoring the
resources and natural processes that occur there.
(11) The feasibility of employing innovative management approaches
to protect sanctuary resources or to manage compatible uses.
(12) The value of the area as an addition to the System.
Proposed Sanctuary Nomination Process
As part of the new sanctuary nomination process, NOAA is
contemplating the following procedures and protocols:
[[Page 38850]]
(1) A nomination must have broad community support, including a
combination of such entities as local government organizations, elected
officials, tribes, stakeholder groups (e.g., industry or non-
governmental organizations), or academia.
(2) In nominating an area for national marine sanctuary
consideration, a coalition of advocates should strive to provide
documentation and/or analyses that address as many of the final
evaluation criteria as possible. (NOAA will publish the final
evaluation criteria in its final rule on this process.)
(3) NOAA will maintain a publically transparent inventory on the
ONMS Web site of those nominations that have successfully demonstrated
eligibility for national marine sanctuary designation. These
nominations would not automatically equate to sanctuary designation.
(4) NOAA would implement any new sanctuary designation as a
separate process from the nomination process, and under the highly
participatory standards enacted by the NMSA and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
Proposed Regulatory Amendments
In this rulemaking, NOAA proposes to revise 15 CFR 922.10 to codify
a statement that NOAA is once again accepting nominations for national
marine sanctuary designation. NOAA is also proposing to eliminate all
regulations related to the SEL by removing 15 CFR 922.21 and 922.23,
and removing SEL from the Definitions section at 15 CFR 922.3.
Note that, through a separate rulemaking action (78 FR 5998,
January 28, 2013), NOAA is also proposing to revise regulations
regarding the SEL as part of a comprehensive regulatory review pursuant
to Executive Order 13563. NOAA will resolve any inconsistencies between
these two rules in the respective final rules.
IV. Classification
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. A description of this action, its purpose, and its legal
basis are described in the preamble to this proposed rule and is not
repeated here. The factual basis for this certification is as follows:
This rule proposes administrative changes to the regulations. The
proposed action will only modify the procedural regulations to
reactivate the sanctuary nomination process and set forth the
nomination process and evaluation criteria for evaluating areas of the
marine environment as possible new national marine sanctuaries.
The types of small entities that may be impacted by this rulemaking
are local government organizations, tribes, stakeholder groups (e.g.,
industry or non-governmental organizations), or academia who wish to
nominate areas of the marine environment for consideration as a
national marine sanctuary. The agency, however, does not currently have
data reflecting how many of these entities would submit nominations for
possible designation as a new national marine sanctuary, but it
anticipates that it would be a very small number. The impacts of this
rulemaking would also be very small, as the proposed provisions merely
set forth the proposed nomination process and evaluation criteria. The
submission of nominations is purely voluntary, and this rulemaking does
not impose any costs or requirements beyond those related to the
preparation of documentation in support of the nomination. This action
does not include any decisions or determinations on future sanctuary
site designations. The impact of future potential national marine
sanctuary designations will be evaluated individually on a case-by-case
basis and will be subject to a Regulatory Flexibility Act review at
that time. Therefore, it is not expected that the modifications of the
regulations at 15 CFR 922.10 will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule does not establish any new reporting, record-
keeping, or other compliance requirements.
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This proposed rule has been determined to not be significant within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 922
Administrative practice and procedure, Amendments, Appeals,
Appellant, Application requirements, Authorizations, Definitions,
Designation, Environmental protection, Marine resources, Motorized
personal watercraft, Natural resources, Permitting, Permit procedures,
Prohibited activities, Special use permit, Stowed and not available for
immediate use, Resources, Research, Traditional fishing, Water
resources.
Dated: June 24, 2013.
Holly A. Bamford,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, NOAA proposes to
amend 15 CFR part 922 as follows:
PART 922--NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY PROGRAM REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 922 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
0
2. Amend Sec. 922.3 by removing the definitions of ``Active
Candidate'' and ``Site Evaluation List.''
0
3. Revise Subpart B to part 922 to read as follows:
Subpart B--Sanctuary Nomination Process
Sec. 922.10 General.
(a) The sanctuary nomination process is currently active.
(b) To find out how to submit a nomination, contact ONMS by
visiting www.sanctuaries.noaa.gov.
(c) The Director will evaluate all nominations according to the
criteria identified in section 303(b) of the National Marine
Sanctuaries Act, Sanctuary Designation Standards (16 U.S.C. 1433), and
any further guidance issued by NOAA.
(d) The Director will maintain a publically available inventory of
sites that NOAA has determined to be eligible for sanctuary
designation.
(e) A determination that a site is eligible for sanctuary
designation, by itself shall not subject the site to any regulatory
control under the Act. Such controls may only be imposed after
designation.
Subpart C--Designation of National Marine Sanctuaries
Sec. 922.21 [Removed and Reserved]
0
4. Remove and reserve Sec. 922.21.
Sec. 922.23 [Removed and Reserved]
0
5. Remove and reserve Sec. 922.23.
[FR Doc. 2013-15488 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P