Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Valves, 38728-38730 [2013-15357]
Download as PDF
38728
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2013 / Notices
Jefferson County for Public Assistance,
including direct federal assistance.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
Michigan; Major Disaster and Related
Determinations
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
Illinois; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of
a Major Disaster Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice amends the notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Illinois (FEMA–4116–DR),
dated May 10, 2013, and related
determinations.
SUMMARY:
Effective Date: June 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4116–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2013–0001]
Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Illinois is hereby amended to
include the following areas among those
areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major
disaster by the President in his
declaration of May 10, 2013.
Brown County for Public Assistance
(already designated for Individual
Assistance).
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
Jkt 229001
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4121–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2013–0001]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
18:12 Jun 26, 2013
[FR Doc. 2013–15358 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am]
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[FR Doc. 2013–15356 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am]
DATES:
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
This is a notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Michigan
(FEMA–4121–DR), dated June 18, 2013,
and related determinations.
DATES: Effective Date: June 18, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that, in a letter dated June
18, 2013, the President issued a major
disaster declaration under the authority
of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’),
as follows:
SUMMARY:
I have determined that the damage in
certain areas of the State of Michigan
resulting from flooding during the period of
April 16 to May 14, 2013, is of sufficient
severity and magnitude to warrant a major
disaster declaration under the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
‘‘Stafford Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such
a major disaster exists in the State of
Michigan.
In order to provide Federal assistance, you
are hereby authorized to allocate from funds
available for these purposes such amounts as
you find necessary for Federal disaster
assistance and administrative expenses.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
You are authorized to provide Public
Assistance in the designated areas and
Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal
assistance is supplemental, any Federal
funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will
be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible
costs.
Further, you are authorized to make
changes to this declaration for the approved
assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.
The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that
pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order
12148, as amended, Mark A. Neveau, of
FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal
Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
The following areas of the State of
Michigan have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:
Allegan, Baraga, Barry, Gogebic, Houghton,
Ionia, Kent, Keweenaw, Marquette, Midland,
Muskegon, Newaygo, Ontonagon, Osceola,
Ottawa, and Saginaw Counties for Public
Assistance.
All counties within the State of Michigan
are eligible to apply for assistance under the
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013–15352 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Valves
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
AGENCY:
This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2013 / Notices
Protection (CBP) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain valves to be offered to
the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. The final determination found
that based upon the facts presented, the
country of origin of the subject valve is
the United States.
Dated: June 14, 2013.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
The final determination was
issued on June 14, 2013. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within 30 days
of June 27, 2013.
CATEGORY: Marking
Mr. Richard O. Wolf
Moore & Lee, LLP
1650 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1150
McLean, VA 22102–4225
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Final
Determination; Country of origin of
valves; substantial transformation; 19
CFR Part 177
Dear Mr. Wolf:
This is in response to your letter on behalf
of Omni Valve Company, LLC (hereinafter
‘‘Omni’’), in which you seek a final
determination pursuant to subpart B of Part
177, Customs Regulations, 19 CFR 177.21 et
seq. Under these regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade Agreements
Act of 1979, as amended, (19 U.S.C. § 2411
et seq.), U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations on whether
an article is or would be a product of a
designated foreign country or instrumentality
for the purpose of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the
U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of the Omni Double Block
& Bleed Valve, a plug-type valve sold as the
‘‘OmniSeal DBB’’, which Omni is
considering selling to the U.S. Government.
We note that Omni is a party-at-interest
within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1)
and is entitled to request this final
determination.
FACTS:
According to your submission and
information provided by Omni, the
‘‘OmniSeal DBB’’ (‘‘DBB’’) is a plug-type
valve often used in fuel storage and
disbursing systems. The DBB expanding plug
valve is designed for applications where
positive shut-off, verifiable zero leakage and
double block and bleed capabilities are
required. It is a single valve solution that
simultaneously blocks both the upstream and
downstream flow while allowing the user to
verify seal integrity using a manual or
automatic body bleed system.
The valve body of the DBB is purchased by
Omni in India and imported into the United
States. The valve body is usable as an
isolation valve. At Omni’s Oklahoma facility,
Omni fabricates and adds an automatic
differential thermal relief system (‘‘ADTR’’)
to the imported valve. The ADTR system is
a multi-joint, multi-instrument system with
various elbow, needle valves and pressure
gauges. Depending on the needs of the
customer, there can be 30 different ADTR
system components. One example of an
ADTR consists of 10 separate Swedgeloc
connections, 6 separate tub sections, 4 small
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
˜
Fernando Pena, Esq., Valuation and
Special Programs Branch, Office of
International Trade; telephone (202)
325–1511.
Notice is
hereby given that on June 14, 2013,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain valves to be offered to
the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. The final determination,
Headquarters Ruling Letter H233698,
was issued at the request of Omni Valve
Company, LLC, under procedures set
forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18).
In the final determination, CBP
concluded that, based upon the facts
presented, the assembly in the United
States of an automatic differential
thermal relief system (‘‘ADTR’’) into an
imported valve body to create the
subject ‘‘Omni Double Block & Bleed
Valve’’ substantially transformed the
foreign body valve into a product of the
U.S. for purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, Customs
Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides
that any party-at-interest, as defined in
19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within
30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:12 Jun 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
Attachment
HQ H233698
June 14, 2013
OT:RR:CTF:VS H233698 FP
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38729
valves, 2 tees and one check valve. The
ADTR system is procured and fabricated in
the U.S. This process involves bending pipe
and attaching the connections and fittings.
Some customers require all joints on the
ADTR system to be welded. After the ADTR
system is fabricated, it is installed onto the
valve body of Indian origin.
It is claimed the ADTR allows the valve to
be bled in order to test seal integrity in
conformance to a prevailing industry
standard. It is at this point, that the finished
article is capable of being used for
applications which require double isolation
and bleed functionality.
ISSUE:
Whether the OmniSeal DBB valves are
considered to be products of the United
States for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Under subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR 177.21
et seq., which implements Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(‘‘TAA’’; 19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues
country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations on whether an article is or
would be a product of a designated country
or instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
part of materials from another country
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final
determinations for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement, CBP applies the
provisions of subpart B of Part 177 consistent
with the Federal Procurement Regulations.
See 19 C.F.R. § 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Procurement
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government’s
purchase of products to U.S.-made or
designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48
C.F.R. § 25.403(c)(1). The Federal
Procurement Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made
end product’’ as:
[A]n article that is mined, produced, or
manufactured in the United States or that is
substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed.
48 C.F.R. § 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of
parts or materials constitutes a substantial
transformation, the determinative issue is the
extent of operations performed and whether
the parts lose their identity and become an
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
38730
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2013 / Notices
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. Unites States, 573 F. Supp. 1149
(CIT 1983), aff’d, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir.
1984). CBP considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such decisions on
a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of
the article’s components, extent of the
processing that occurs within a given
country, and whether such processing
renders a product with a new name,
character, or use are primary considerations
in such cases. Additionally, facts such as
resources expended on product design and
development, extent and nature of postassembly inspection procedures, and worker
skill required during the actual
manufacturing process will be considered
when analyzing whether a substantial
transformation has occurred; however, no
one such factor is determinative.
CBP’s predecessor agency, the U.S.
Customs Service (‘‘Customs’’), previously
found imported valve components to have
been substantially transformed when used in
the manufacture of finished valves. See
Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HRL’’) 729335
(April 18, 1986); HRL 731828 (January 30,
1990); and HRL 558008 (November 16, 1994).
In HRL 729335 dated April 18, 1986,
Customs found that a substantial
transformation had taken place when
finished body castings and bonnet castings
were combined in the U.S. with valve stems,
discs, disc screws and handwheels to
produce complete plumbing valves. In HRL
731828 it was determined that the
production of ball valves using foreign valve
bodies and bonnets combined with U.S.
origin balls, seats, stems, and various seals
and washers effected substantial
transformation of the foreign materials.
Finally, in HRL 558008 Customs considered
the assembly of water system valves using
imported valve body castings and other
internal components. It was concluded that
an assembly entailing the installation of
various subassemblies, gaskets, bolts, seals
and other parts resulted in substantial
transformation of the imported components.
It is our conclusion that the assembly
operations carried out by Omni on the
imported components are closely comparable
to those considered in the rulings cited. The
number of parts assembled, including
significant numbers of U.S.-origin parts, and
the relative complexity of the operations
carried out, indicate that the imported
components have undergone a substantial
transformation by reason of the operations
carried out in the United States. Accordingly,
the finished DBB will be considered a
product of the United States for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement in making this
determination.
HOLDING:
On the basis of the information provided,
we find that the assembly in the U.S.
substantially transforms the components of
foreign origin in DBB valves with an ADTR
system. Therefore, the country of origin of
Omni’s DBB is the United States for purposes
of U.S. Government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register as required by
19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:12 Jun 26, 2013
Jkt 229001
determination may request, pursuant to 19
CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination.
Any party-at-interest may, within 30 days
after publication of the Federal Register
notice referenced above, seek judicial review
of this final determination before the Court
of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2013–15357 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5700–FA–04]
Announcement of Funding Awards for
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control, and
Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration
Grant Programs for Fiscal Year (FY)
2013
Office of Healthy Homes and
Lead Hazard Control, HUD.
ACTION: Announcement of funding
awards.
AGENCY:
In accordance with Section
102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of
Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of 1989, this announcement
notifies the public of funding decisions
made by the Department in
competitions for funding under the
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control (OHHLHC) Lead-Based
Paint Hazard Control, and Lead Hazard
Reduction Demonstration Grant
Program Notices of Funding
Availability. This announcement
contains the name and address of the
award recipients and the amounts of
awards under the Consolidated and
Further Appropriations Act, 2013, and
prior-year appropriations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew E. Ammon, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, Office
of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard
Control, Room 8236, 451 Seventh Street
SW., Washington, DC 20410, telephone
202–402–4337. Hearing- and speechimpaired persons may access the
number above via TTY by calling the
toll free Federal Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HUD
announced the FY 2013 awards on May
23, 2013. These awards were the result
of competitions posted on the Internet at
Grants.gov on December 3, 2012, and
amended on January 18, 2013, for the
Lead Based Paint Hazard Control and
the Lead Hazard Reduction
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Demonstration Programs (FR–5700–N–
04). The purpose of the competitions
was to award funding for grants for the
Office of Healthy Homes and Lead
Hazard Control Grant Programs.
Applications were scored and
selected on the basis of selection criteria
contained in this Notice. A total of
$95,395,943 was awarded under the
Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113–
6, approved May 13, 2013) and prior
year appropriations. In accordance with
Section 102(a)(4)(C) of the Department
of Housing and Urban Development
Reform Act of 1989 (103 Stat. 1987; 42
U.S.C. 3545), the Department is
publishing the names, addresses, and
the amount of these awards as follows:
1. Lead Based Paint Hazard Control
Program
A total of $55,916,825.50 was
awarded to 25 grantees for the Lead
Based Paint Hazard Control Grant
Program and an additional $4,475,885
was awarded to 23 of the 25 grantees for
the Healthy Homes Initiative under the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012:
County of Rock, 51 South Main Street,
Janesville, WI 53545–3951, $2,500,000;
City of Duluth, 411 West First Street,
Room 407, Duluth, MN 55802–1197,
$2,481,395; City of Moline, 619 16
Street, Moline, IL 61265–2121,
$2,500,000; City of New London, 111
Union Street, New London, CT 06320–
6634, $2,020,956; Louisville/Jefferson
County Metro Government, 527 W.
Jefferson Street, Louisville, KY 40202–
2814, $2,402,849.50; City of Bridgeport,
999 Broad Street, Bridgeport, CT 06604–
4060, $2,499,960; City of Henderson,
P.O. Box 95050, 240 Water Street,
Henderson, NV 89009–5050,
$2,293,701; City of Knoxville,
Tennessee, 400 Main Street, Knoxville,
TN 37902–2405, $2,500,000; City of
Boston, 26 Court Street, Boston, MA
02108–2501, $2,500,000; City of Austin,
1000 E. 11th Street, Suite 200, Austin,
TX 78702–1945, $2,500,000; City of
Winston- Salem, 100 E. First Street,
Suite 423, Winston- Salem, NC 27101–
4000, $2,500,000; State of Ohio—Ohio
Department of Health, 246 North High
Street, Columbus, OH 43215–2412,
$2,500,000; County of Orange, 255 Main
Street, Goshen, NY 10924–1619,
$2,500,000; St. Clair County
Intergovernmental Grants Department,
19 Public Square Suite 200, Belleville,
IL 62220–1695, $1,635,563; Shelby
County Government, 1075 Mullins
Station Road, Memphis, TN 38134–
7730, $2,300,000; Summit County
Combined General Health District, 1100
Graham Road Circle, Stow, OH 44224–
2992, $2,500,000; Salt Lake County,
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38728-38730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15357]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Valves
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
[[Page 38729]]
Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain valves to be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. The
final determination found that based upon the facts presented, the
country of origin of the subject valve is the United States.
DATES: The final determination was issued on June 14, 2013. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within 30 days of June 27, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fernando Pe[ntilde]a, Esq., Valuation
and Special Programs Branch, Office of International Trade; telephone
(202) 325-1511.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on June 14,
2013, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain valves to be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. The
final determination, Headquarters Ruling Letter H233698, was issued at
the request of Omni Valve Company, LLC, under procedures set forth at
19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18).
In the final determination, CBP concluded that, based upon the
facts presented, the assembly in the United States of an automatic
differential thermal relief system (``ADTR'') into an imported valve
body to create the subject ``Omni Double Block & Bleed Valve''
substantially transformed the foreign body valve into a product of the
U.S. for purposes of U.S. government procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: June 14, 2013.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
Attachment[Follow Lit]
HQ H233698
June 14, 2013
OT:RR:CTF:VS H233698 FP
CATEGORY: Marking
Mr. Richard O. Wolf
Moore & Lee, LLP
1650 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1150
McLean, VA 22102-4225
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Final Determination; Country of
origin of valves; substantial transformation; 19 CFR Part 177
Dear Mr. Wolf:
This is in response to your letter on behalf of Omni Valve
Company, LLC (hereinafter ``Omni''), in which you seek a final
determination pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, Customs
Regulations, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq. Under these regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended,
(19 U.S.C. Sec. 2411 et seq.), U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``CBP'') issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations on whether an article is or would be a product of a
designated foreign country or instrumentality for the purpose of
granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S.
law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of the
Omni Double Block & Bleed Valve, a plug-type valve sold as the
``OmniSeal DBB'', which Omni is considering selling to the U.S.
Government. We note that Omni is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final
determination.
FACTS:
According to your submission and information provided by Omni,
the ``OmniSeal DBB'' (``DBB'') is a plug-type valve often used in
fuel storage and disbursing systems. The DBB expanding plug valve is
designed for applications where positive shut-off, verifiable zero
leakage and double block and bleed capabilities are required. It is
a single valve solution that simultaneously blocks both the upstream
and downstream flow while allowing the user to verify seal integrity
using a manual or automatic body bleed system.
The valve body of the DBB is purchased by Omni in India and
imported into the United States. The valve body is usable as an
isolation valve. At Omni's Oklahoma facility, Omni fabricates and
adds an automatic differential thermal relief system (``ADTR'') to
the imported valve. The ADTR system is a multi-joint, multi-
instrument system with various elbow, needle valves and pressure
gauges. Depending on the needs of the customer, there can be 30
different ADTR system components. One example of an ADTR consists of
10 separate Swedgeloc connections, 6 separate tub sections, 4 small
valves, 2 tees and one check valve. The ADTR system is procured and
fabricated in the U.S. This process involves bending pipe and
attaching the connections and fittings. Some customers require all
joints on the ADTR system to be welded. After the ADTR system is
fabricated, it is installed onto the valve body of Indian origin.
It is claimed the ADTR allows the valve to be bled in order to
test seal integrity in conformance to a prevailing industry
standard. It is at this point, that the finished article is capable
of being used for applications which require double isolation and
bleed functionality.
ISSUE:
Whether the OmniSeal DBB valves are considered to be products of
the United States for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Under subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(``TAA''; 19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations on whether an article is
or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i)
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different
article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from
that of the article or articles from which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 CFR 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions
of subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement
Regulations. See 19 C.F.R. Sec. 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Procurement Regulations restrict the
U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated
country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48
C.F.R. Sec. 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Procurement Regulations
define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
[A]n article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United
States or that is substantially transformed in the United States
into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character,
or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it
was transformed.
48 C.F.R. Sec. 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an
[[Page 38730]]
integral part of the new article. Belcrest Linens v. Unites States,
573 F. Supp. 1149 (CIT 1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such
decisions on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the
article's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
given country, and whether such processing renders a product with a
new name, character, or use are primary considerations in such
cases. Additionally, facts such as resources expended on product
design and development, extent and nature of post-assembly
inspection procedures, and worker skill required during the actual
manufacturing process will be considered when analyzing whether a
substantial transformation has occurred; however, no one such factor
is determinative.
CBP's predecessor agency, the U.S. Customs Service
(``Customs''), previously found imported valve components to have
been substantially transformed when used in the manufacture of
finished valves. See Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HRL'') 729335
(April 18, 1986); HRL 731828 (January 30, 1990); and HRL 558008
(November 16, 1994). In HRL 729335 dated April 18, 1986, Customs
found that a substantial transformation had taken place when
finished body castings and bonnet castings were combined in the U.S.
with valve stems, discs, disc screws and handwheels to produce
complete plumbing valves. In HRL 731828 it was determined that the
production of ball valves using foreign valve bodies and bonnets
combined with U.S. origin balls, seats, stems, and various seals and
washers effected substantial transformation of the foreign
materials. Finally, in HRL 558008 Customs considered the assembly of
water system valves using imported valve body castings and other
internal components. It was concluded that an assembly entailing the
installation of various subassemblies, gaskets, bolts, seals and
other parts resulted in substantial transformation of the imported
components.
It is our conclusion that the assembly operations carried out by
Omni on the imported components are closely comparable to those
considered in the rulings cited. The number of parts assembled,
including significant numbers of U.S.-origin parts, and the relative
complexity of the operations carried out, indicate that the imported
components have undergone a substantial transformation by reason of
the operations carried out in the United States. Accordingly, the
finished DBB will be considered a product of the United States for
purposes of U.S. Government procurement in making this
determination.
HOLDING:
On the basis of the information provided, we find that the
assembly in the U.S. substantially transforms the components of
foreign origin in DBB valves with an ADTR system. Therefore, the
country of origin of Omni's DBB is the United States for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination. Any party-at-interest may, within
30 days after publication of the Federal Register notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final determination before the
Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International
Trade.
[FR Doc. 2013-15357 Filed 6-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P