Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Valves, 38728-38730 [2013-15357]

Download as PDF 38728 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2013 / Notices Jefferson County for Public Assistance, including direct federal assistance. The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant. W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Michigan; Major Disaster and Related Determinations Federal Emergency Management Agency Illinois; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Illinois (FEMA–4116–DR), dated May 10, 2013, and related determinations. SUMMARY: Effective Date: June 20, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4116– DR; Docket ID FEMA–2013–0001] Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Illinois is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 10, 2013. Brown County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance). The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; Jkt 229001 BILLING CODE 9111–23–P [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4121– DR; Docket ID FEMA–2013–0001] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 18:12 Jun 26, 2013 [FR Doc. 2013–15358 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am] Federal Emergency Management Agency BILLING CODE 9111–23–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [FR Doc. 2013–15356 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am] DATES: 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant. This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Michigan (FEMA–4121–DR), dated June 18, 2013, and related determinations. DATES: Effective Date: June 18, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated June 18, 2013, the President issued a major disaster declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’), as follows: SUMMARY: I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State of Michigan resulting from flooding during the period of April 16 to May 14, 2013, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ‘‘Stafford Act’’). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in the State of Michigan. In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses. PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance is supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs. Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Mark A. Neveau, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster. The following areas of the State of Michigan have been designated as adversely affected by this major disaster: Allegan, Baraga, Barry, Gogebic, Houghton, Ionia, Kent, Keweenaw, Marquette, Midland, Muskegon, Newaygo, Ontonagon, Osceola, Ottawa, and Saginaw Counties for Public Assistance. All counties within the State of Michigan are eligible to apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance— Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant. W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency. [FR Doc. 2013–15352 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–23–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Customs and Border Protection Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Valves U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of final determination. AGENCY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2013 / Notices Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of certain valves to be offered to the U.S. Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. The final determination found that based upon the facts presented, the country of origin of the subject valve is the United States. Dated: June 14, 2013. Sandra L. Bell, Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade. The final determination was issued on June 14, 2013. A copy of the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final determination within 30 days of June 27, 2013. CATEGORY: Marking Mr. Richard O. Wolf Moore & Lee, LLP 1650 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1150 McLean, VA 22102–4225 RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Final Determination; Country of origin of valves; substantial transformation; 19 CFR Part 177 Dear Mr. Wolf: This is in response to your letter on behalf of Omni Valve Company, LLC (hereinafter ‘‘Omni’’), in which you seek a final determination pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, Customs Regulations, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq. Under these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended, (19 U.S.C. § 2411 et seq.), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations on whether an article is or would be a product of a designated foreign country or instrumentality for the purpose of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government. This final determination concerns the country of origin of the Omni Double Block & Bleed Valve, a plug-type valve sold as the ‘‘OmniSeal DBB’’, which Omni is considering selling to the U.S. Government. We note that Omni is a party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final determination. FACTS: According to your submission and information provided by Omni, the ‘‘OmniSeal DBB’’ (‘‘DBB’’) is a plug-type valve often used in fuel storage and disbursing systems. The DBB expanding plug valve is designed for applications where positive shut-off, verifiable zero leakage and double block and bleed capabilities are required. It is a single valve solution that simultaneously blocks both the upstream and downstream flow while allowing the user to verify seal integrity using a manual or automatic body bleed system. The valve body of the DBB is purchased by Omni in India and imported into the United States. The valve body is usable as an isolation valve. At Omni’s Oklahoma facility, Omni fabricates and adds an automatic differential thermal relief system (‘‘ADTR’’) to the imported valve. The ADTR system is a multi-joint, multi-instrument system with various elbow, needle valves and pressure gauges. Depending on the needs of the customer, there can be 30 different ADTR system components. One example of an ADTR consists of 10 separate Swedgeloc connections, 6 separate tub sections, 4 small DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: ˜ Fernando Pena, Esq., Valuation and Special Programs Branch, Office of International Trade; telephone (202) 325–1511. Notice is hereby given that on June 14, 2013, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the country of origin of certain valves to be offered to the U.S. Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. The final determination, Headquarters Ruling Letter H233698, was issued at the request of Omni Valve Company, LLC, under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final determination, CBP concluded that, based upon the facts presented, the assembly in the United States of an automatic differential thermal relief system (‘‘ADTR’’) into an imported valve body to create the subject ‘‘Omni Double Block & Bleed Valve’’ substantially transformed the foreign body valve into a product of the U.S. for purposes of U.S. government procurement. Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. Section 177.30, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such determination in the Federal Register. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:12 Jun 26, 2013 Jkt 229001 Attachment HQ H233698 June 14, 2013 OT:RR:CTF:VS H233698 FP PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 38729 valves, 2 tees and one check valve. The ADTR system is procured and fabricated in the U.S. This process involves bending pipe and attaching the connections and fittings. Some customers require all joints on the ADTR system to be welded. After the ADTR system is fabricated, it is installed onto the valve body of Indian origin. It is claimed the ADTR allows the valve to be bled in order to test seal integrity in conformance to a prevailing industry standard. It is at this point, that the finished article is capable of being used for applications which require double isolation and bleed functionality. ISSUE: Whether the OmniSeal DBB valves are considered to be products of the United States for purposes of U.S. Government procurement. LAW AND ANALYSIS: Under subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (‘‘TAA’’; 19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations on whether an article is or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government. Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B): An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in whole or in part of materials from another country instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so transformed. See also, 19 CFR 177.22(a). In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions of subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement Regulations. See 19 C.F.R. § 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that the Federal Procurement Regulations restrict the U.S. Government’s purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 C.F.R. § 25.403(c)(1). The Federal Procurement Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end product’’ as: [A]n article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States or that is substantially transformed in the United States into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was transformed. 48 C.F.R. § 25.003. In determining whether the combining of parts or materials constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their identity and become an E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 38730 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 124 / Thursday, June 27, 2013 / Notices integral part of the new article. Belcrest Linens v. Unites States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (CIT 1983), aff’d, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such decisions on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the article’s components, extent of the processing that occurs within a given country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name, character, or use are primary considerations in such cases. Additionally, facts such as resources expended on product design and development, extent and nature of postassembly inspection procedures, and worker skill required during the actual manufacturing process will be considered when analyzing whether a substantial transformation has occurred; however, no one such factor is determinative. CBP’s predecessor agency, the U.S. Customs Service (‘‘Customs’’), previously found imported valve components to have been substantially transformed when used in the manufacture of finished valves. See Headquarters Ruling Letter (‘‘HRL’’) 729335 (April 18, 1986); HRL 731828 (January 30, 1990); and HRL 558008 (November 16, 1994). In HRL 729335 dated April 18, 1986, Customs found that a substantial transformation had taken place when finished body castings and bonnet castings were combined in the U.S. with valve stems, discs, disc screws and handwheels to produce complete plumbing valves. In HRL 731828 it was determined that the production of ball valves using foreign valve bodies and bonnets combined with U.S. origin balls, seats, stems, and various seals and washers effected substantial transformation of the foreign materials. Finally, in HRL 558008 Customs considered the assembly of water system valves using imported valve body castings and other internal components. It was concluded that an assembly entailing the installation of various subassemblies, gaskets, bolts, seals and other parts resulted in substantial transformation of the imported components. It is our conclusion that the assembly operations carried out by Omni on the imported components are closely comparable to those considered in the rulings cited. The number of parts assembled, including significant numbers of U.S.-origin parts, and the relative complexity of the operations carried out, indicate that the imported components have undergone a substantial transformation by reason of the operations carried out in the United States. Accordingly, the finished DBB will be considered a product of the United States for purposes of U.S. Government procurement in making this determination. HOLDING: On the basis of the information provided, we find that the assembly in the U.S. substantially transforms the components of foreign origin in DBB valves with an ADTR system. Therefore, the country of origin of Omni’s DBB is the United States for purposes of U.S. Government procurement. Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal Register as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other than the party which requested this final VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:12 Jun 26, 2013 Jkt 229001 determination may request, pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and issue a new final determination. Any party-at-interest may, within 30 days after publication of the Federal Register notice referenced above, seek judicial review of this final determination before the Court of International Trade. Sincerely, Sandra L. Bell, Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade. [FR Doc. 2013–15357 Filed 6–26–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5700–FA–04] Announcement of Funding Awards for Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control, and Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Programs for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, HUD. ACTION: Announcement of funding awards. AGENCY: In accordance with Section 102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989, this announcement notifies the public of funding decisions made by the Department in competitions for funding under the Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control (OHHLHC) Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control, and Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program Notices of Funding Availability. This announcement contains the name and address of the award recipients and the amounts of awards under the Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act, 2013, and prior-year appropriations. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew E. Ammon, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control, Room 8236, 451 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20410, telephone 202–402–4337. Hearing- and speechimpaired persons may access the number above via TTY by calling the toll free Federal Relay Service at 1–800– 877–8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: HUD announced the FY 2013 awards on May 23, 2013. These awards were the result of competitions posted on the Internet at Grants.gov on December 3, 2012, and amended on January 18, 2013, for the Lead Based Paint Hazard Control and the Lead Hazard Reduction SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Demonstration Programs (FR–5700–N– 04). The purpose of the competitions was to award funding for grants for the Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control Grant Programs. Applications were scored and selected on the basis of selection criteria contained in this Notice. A total of $95,395,943 was awarded under the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113– 6, approved May 13, 2013) and prior year appropriations. In accordance with Section 102(a)(4)(C) of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Reform Act of 1989 (103 Stat. 1987; 42 U.S.C. 3545), the Department is publishing the names, addresses, and the amount of these awards as follows: 1. Lead Based Paint Hazard Control Program A total of $55,916,825.50 was awarded to 25 grantees for the Lead Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program and an additional $4,475,885 was awarded to 23 of the 25 grantees for the Healthy Homes Initiative under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012: County of Rock, 51 South Main Street, Janesville, WI 53545–3951, $2,500,000; City of Duluth, 411 West First Street, Room 407, Duluth, MN 55802–1197, $2,481,395; City of Moline, 619 16 Street, Moline, IL 61265–2121, $2,500,000; City of New London, 111 Union Street, New London, CT 06320– 6634, $2,020,956; Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, 527 W. Jefferson Street, Louisville, KY 40202– 2814, $2,402,849.50; City of Bridgeport, 999 Broad Street, Bridgeport, CT 06604– 4060, $2,499,960; City of Henderson, P.O. Box 95050, 240 Water Street, Henderson, NV 89009–5050, $2,293,701; City of Knoxville, Tennessee, 400 Main Street, Knoxville, TN 37902–2405, $2,500,000; City of Boston, 26 Court Street, Boston, MA 02108–2501, $2,500,000; City of Austin, 1000 E. 11th Street, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78702–1945, $2,500,000; City of Winston- Salem, 100 E. First Street, Suite 423, Winston- Salem, NC 27101– 4000, $2,500,000; State of Ohio—Ohio Department of Health, 246 North High Street, Columbus, OH 43215–2412, $2,500,000; County of Orange, 255 Main Street, Goshen, NY 10924–1619, $2,500,000; St. Clair County Intergovernmental Grants Department, 19 Public Square Suite 200, Belleville, IL 62220–1695, $1,635,563; Shelby County Government, 1075 Mullins Station Road, Memphis, TN 38134– 7730, $2,300,000; Summit County Combined General Health District, 1100 Graham Road Circle, Stow, OH 44224– 2992, $2,500,000; Salt Lake County, E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM 27JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 124 (Thursday, June 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38728-38730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Valves

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of final determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border

[[Page 38729]]

Protection (CBP) has issued a final determination concerning the 
country of origin of certain valves to be offered to the U.S. 
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. The 
final determination found that based upon the facts presented, the 
country of origin of the subject valve is the United States.

DATES: The final determination was issued on June 14, 2013. A copy of 
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest as defined 
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final 
determination within 30 days of June 27, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fernando Pe[ntilde]a, Esq., Valuation 
and Special Programs Branch, Office of International Trade; telephone 
(202) 325-1511.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on June 14, 
2013, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the 
country of origin of certain valves to be offered to the U.S. 
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. The 
final determination, Headquarters Ruling Letter H233698, was issued at 
the request of Omni Valve Company, LLC, under procedures set forth at 
19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the Trade 
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18).
    In the final determination, CBP concluded that, based upon the 
facts presented, the assembly in the United States of an automatic 
differential thermal relief system (``ADTR'') into an imported valve 
body to create the subject ``Omni Double Block & Bleed Valve'' 
substantially transformed the foreign body valve into a product of the 
U.S. for purposes of U.S. government procurement.
    Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that 
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal 
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued. 
Section 177.30, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any 
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial 
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such 
determination in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 14, 2013.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International 
Trade.

Attachment[Follow Lit]

HQ H233698

June 14, 2013

OT:RR:CTF:VS H233698 FP

CATEGORY: Marking

Mr. Richard O. Wolf
Moore & Lee, LLP
1650 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1150
McLean, VA 22102-4225

RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Final Determination; Country of 
origin of valves; substantial transformation; 19 CFR Part 177

Dear Mr. Wolf:

    This is in response to your letter on behalf of Omni Valve 
Company, LLC (hereinafter ``Omni''), in which you seek a final 
determination pursuant to subpart B of Part 177, Customs 
Regulations, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq. Under these regulations, which 
implement Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. Sec.  2411 et seq.), U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') issues country of origin advisory rulings and final 
determinations on whether an article is or would be a product of a 
designated foreign country or instrumentality for the purpose of 
granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. 
law or practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. 
Government.
    This final determination concerns the country of origin of the 
Omni Double Block & Bleed Valve, a plug-type valve sold as the 
``OmniSeal DBB'', which Omni is considering selling to the U.S. 
Government. We note that Omni is a party-at-interest within the 
meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request this final 
determination.

FACTS:

    According to your submission and information provided by Omni, 
the ``OmniSeal DBB'' (``DBB'') is a plug-type valve often used in 
fuel storage and disbursing systems. The DBB expanding plug valve is 
designed for applications where positive shut-off, verifiable zero 
leakage and double block and bleed capabilities are required. It is 
a single valve solution that simultaneously blocks both the upstream 
and downstream flow while allowing the user to verify seal integrity 
using a manual or automatic body bleed system.
    The valve body of the DBB is purchased by Omni in India and 
imported into the United States. The valve body is usable as an 
isolation valve. At Omni's Oklahoma facility, Omni fabricates and 
adds an automatic differential thermal relief system (``ADTR'') to 
the imported valve. The ADTR system is a multi-joint, multi-
instrument system with various elbow, needle valves and pressure 
gauges. Depending on the needs of the customer, there can be 30 
different ADTR system components. One example of an ADTR consists of 
10 separate Swedgeloc connections, 6 separate tub sections, 4 small 
valves, 2 tees and one check valve. The ADTR system is procured and 
fabricated in the U.S. This process involves bending pipe and 
attaching the connections and fittings. Some customers require all 
joints on the ADTR system to be welded. After the ADTR system is 
fabricated, it is installed onto the valve body of Indian origin.
    It is claimed the ADTR allows the valve to be bled in order to 
test seal integrity in conformance to a prevailing industry 
standard. It is at this point, that the finished article is capable 
of being used for applications which require double isolation and 
bleed functionality.

ISSUE:

    Whether the OmniSeal DBB valves are considered to be products of 
the United States for purposes of U.S. Government procurement.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

    Under subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which 
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended 
(``TAA''; 19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin 
advisory rulings and final determinations on whether an article is 
or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for 
the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American'' 
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale 
to the U.S. Government.
    Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):

An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) 
it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or 
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in 
whole or in part of materials from another country instrumentality, 
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different 
article of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from 
that of the article or articles from which it was so transformed.

See also, 19 CFR 177.22(a).

    In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for 
purposes of U.S. Government procurement, CBP applies the provisions 
of subpart B of Part 177 consistent with the Federal Procurement 
Regulations. See 19 C.F.R. Sec.  177.21. In this regard, CBP 
recognizes that the Federal Procurement Regulations restrict the 
U.S. Government's purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated 
country end products for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 
C.F.R. Sec.  25.403(c)(1). The Federal Procurement Regulations 
define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:

[A]n article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the United 
States or that is substantially transformed in the United States 
into a new and different article of commerce with a name, character, 
or use distinct from that of the article or articles from which it 
was transformed.

48 C.F.R. Sec.  25.003.

    In determining whether the combining of parts or materials 
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is 
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their 
identity and become an

[[Page 38730]]

integral part of the new article. Belcrest Linens v. Unites States, 
573 F. Supp. 1149 (CIT 1983), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). 
CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes such 
decisions on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of the 
article's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a 
given country, and whether such processing renders a product with a 
new name, character, or use are primary considerations in such 
cases. Additionally, facts such as resources expended on product 
design and development, extent and nature of post-assembly 
inspection procedures, and worker skill required during the actual 
manufacturing process will be considered when analyzing whether a 
substantial transformation has occurred; however, no one such factor 
is determinative.
    CBP's predecessor agency, the U.S. Customs Service 
(``Customs''), previously found imported valve components to have 
been substantially transformed when used in the manufacture of 
finished valves. See Headquarters Ruling Letter (``HRL'') 729335 
(April 18, 1986); HRL 731828 (January 30, 1990); and HRL 558008 
(November 16, 1994). In HRL 729335 dated April 18, 1986, Customs 
found that a substantial transformation had taken place when 
finished body castings and bonnet castings were combined in the U.S. 
with valve stems, discs, disc screws and handwheels to produce 
complete plumbing valves. In HRL 731828 it was determined that the 
production of ball valves using foreign valve bodies and bonnets 
combined with U.S. origin balls, seats, stems, and various seals and 
washers effected substantial transformation of the foreign 
materials. Finally, in HRL 558008 Customs considered the assembly of 
water system valves using imported valve body castings and other 
internal components. It was concluded that an assembly entailing the 
installation of various subassemblies, gaskets, bolts, seals and 
other parts resulted in substantial transformation of the imported 
components.
    It is our conclusion that the assembly operations carried out by 
Omni on the imported components are closely comparable to those 
considered in the rulings cited. The number of parts assembled, 
including significant numbers of U.S.-origin parts, and the relative 
complexity of the operations carried out, indicate that the imported 
components have undergone a substantial transformation by reason of 
the operations carried out in the United States. Accordingly, the 
finished DBB will be considered a product of the United States for 
purposes of U.S. Government procurement in making this 
determination.

HOLDING:

    On the basis of the information provided, we find that the 
assembly in the U.S. substantially transforms the components of 
foreign origin in DBB valves with an ADTR system. Therefore, the 
country of origin of Omni's DBB is the United States for purposes of 
U.S. Government procurement.
    Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal 
Register as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other 
than the party which requested this final determination may request, 
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and 
issue a new final determination. Any party-at-interest may, within 
30 days after publication of the Federal Register notice referenced 
above, seek judicial review of this final determination before the 
Court of International Trade.

Sincerely,

Sandra L. Bell,

Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International 
Trade.

[FR Doc. 2013-15357 Filed 6-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.