Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; California; South Coast Air Basin; Approval of PM10, 38223-38226 [2013-15145]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
least 10 meet the minimum
requirements for § 721.63(a)(4):
(A) NIOSH-certified air-purifying,
tight-fitting half-face respirator
equipped with N100 (if oil aerosols
absent), R100, or P100 filters;
(B) NIOSH-certified air-purifying,
tight-fitting full-face respirator equipped
with N100 (if oil aerosols absent), R100,
or P100 filters;
(C) NIOSH-certified powered airpurifying respirator equipped with a
loose- fitting hood or helmet and high
efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters;
(D) NIOSH-certified powered airpurifying respirator equipped with a
tight-fitting facepiece (either half-face or
full-face) and HEPA filters; or
(E) NIOSH-certified supplied-air
respirator operated in pressure demand
or continuous flow mode and equipped
with a hood or helmet, or tight-fitting
facepiece (either half-face or full-face).
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80 (f), (j), (s)(1000
kilograms), (v)(1), and (v)(2).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (i) are
applicable to manufacturers, and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of this section.
The provisions of § 721.1725(b)(1)
apply to this section.
■ 16. Add § 721.10279 to subpart E to
read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 721.10279 Multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (generic) (P–10–246).
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified
generically as multi-walled carbon
nanotubes (PMN P–10–246) is subject to
reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The
requirements of this rule do not apply
to quantities of the PMN substance after
it has been completely reacted (cured);
embedded or incorporated into a
polymer matrix that itself has been
reacted (cured); embedded in a
permanent solid polymer form that is
not intended to undergo further
processing, except for mechanical
processing.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Jun 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Protection in the workplace.
Requirements as specified in
§ 721.63(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (a)(3),
(a)(4), (a)(6)(i), (a)(6)(ii), and (c). When
determining which persons are
reasonably likely to be exposed as
required for § 721.63(a)(1) and (a)(4),
engineering control measures (e.g.,
physical containment, exhaust control
ventilation, or isolation) or
administrative control measures (e.g.,
workplace policies and procedures)
shall be considered and implemented to
prevent exposure, where feasible. The
following National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH)-certified respirators with an
assigned protection factor (APF) of at
least 50 meet the minimum
requirements for § 721.63(a)(4):
(A) NIOSH-certified air-purifying,
tight-fitting full-face respirator equipped
with N100 (if oil aerosols absent), R100,
or P100 filters;
(B) NIOSH-certified powered airpurifying respirator equipped with a
loose-fitting hood or helmet and high
efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters;
or
(C) NIOSH-certified powered airpurifying respirator equipped with a
tight-fitting facepiece (either half-face or
full-face) and HEPA filters.
(ii) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(f), (k) (conductivity
additive to resins, rubber, and to battery
electrodes), and (q).
(iii) Release to water. Requirements as
specified in § 721.90(b)(1), and (c)(1).
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (i), and (k)
are applicable to manufacturers, and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
(3) Determining whether a specific use
is subject to this section. The provisions
of § 721.1725(b)(1) apply to paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of this section.
■ 17. Add § 721.10280 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10280 Benzene ethenyl-, polymer
with 1,3-butadiene, brominated.
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified as
benzene ethenyl-, polymer with 1,3butadiene, brominated (PMN P–10–476;
CAS No. 1195978–93–8)) is subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38223
reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(j) (manufacture by
the method where the average number
molecular weight is in the range of 1000
to 10,000 daltons, or where less than 5
percent of the particles are in the
respirable range of 10 microns or less
and the average number molecular
weight is greater than or equal to 10,000
daltons).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are
applicable to manufacturers, and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
[FR Doc. 2013–15032 Filed 6–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0007; FRL–9826–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; California; South Coast Air
Basin; Approval of PM10 Maintenance
Plan and Redesignation to Attainment
for the PM10 Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving, as a
revision to the California State
implementation plan (SIP), the State’s
request to redesignate the Los AngelesSouth Coast Air Basin (South Coast) to
attainment for the 24-hour particulate
matter of ten microns or less (PM10)
national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS). EPA is also approving the
PM10 maintenance plan and the
associated PM10 motor vehicle
emissions budgets for use in
transportation conformity
determinations necessary for the South
Coast PM10 area. Finally, EPA is
approving the attainment year emissions
inventory. EPA is taking these actions
because the SIP revision meets the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
38224
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
and EPA guidance for such plans and
motor vehicle emissions budgets.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on July 26, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may inspect the
supporting information for this action,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2013–0007, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking portal,
https://www.regulations.gov, please
follow the online instructions; or,
2. Visit our regional office at, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., voluminous records, large
maps, copyrighted material), and some
may not be publicly available in either
location (e.g., Confidential Business
Information). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed directly
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4192, tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Summary of Proposed Action
II. Public Comment and EPA Response
III. EPA’s Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Summary of Proposed Action
On April 8, 2013 (78 FR 20868), based
on EPA’s review of the Final PM10
Redesignation Request and
Maintenance Plan for the South Coast
Air Basin (December 2009) (‘‘2009
South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan’’)
submitted by California, air quality
monitoring data, and other relevant
materials, EPA proposed to approve the
State of California’s request to
redesignate the South Coast PM10
nonattainment area to attainment of the
PM10 NAAQS, pursuant to CAA sections
107(d)(3)(E) and 175A. The background
for today’s actions is discussed in detail
in EPA’s April 8, 2013 proposed
rulemaking and technical support
document (TSD).
We based our conclusion that the area
had attained the standard on our
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Jun 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
determination that the three years of
complete, quality-assured data for the
period 2008–2010 showed that the
South Coast PM10 nonattainment area
had attained the PM10 NAAQS.
We also determined based on more
recent data that the area continues to
attain the NAAQS based on certified,
quality-assured 2012 data. Data for 2013
have not been submitted to EPA’s Air
Quality System (AQS) and are not
required to be submitted until June 30,
2013.
Our proposed approval of the
redesignation request was based on
EPA’s finding that the area meets all
other CAA redesignation requirements
under section 107(d)(3)(E) and the CAA
maintenance plan requirements under
section 175A.
EPA proposed to approve the State’s
maintenance plan, which includes SIPapproved control measures for fugitive
dust, open burning and wood burning
devices, cement manufacturing,
aggregate and related operations, and
paved and unpaved roads, among
others. Implementation of these control
measures has resulted in attainment of
the PM10 NAAQS in the South Coast
nonattainment area and the continued
implementation of these control
measures is expected to provide for
maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS into
the future. We also proposed to approve
the motor vehicle emissions budgets
associated with the plan because the
plan demonstrated that these emissions
levels, when considered with emissions
from all other sources, were consistent
with maintenance of the NAAQS.
Finally, EPA proposed to approve the
attainment year emissions inventory
submitted with the maintenance plan as
meeting the requirements of CAA
section 172(c)(3).
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA provided for a 30-day public
comment period on our proposed
action. The comment period ended on
May 8, 2013. We received one comment
letter from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD or
District) on May 8, 2013.1 We respond
to that comment here.
Comment: SCAQMD strongly
supports EPA’s proposed action. The
District also commented that it
submitted, through CARB, exceptional
events packages requesting exclusion of
monitoring data from multiple sites in
the SCAQMD network from October 21,
1 See letter, Elaine Chang, DrPH, Deputy
Executive Officer, South Coast Air Quality
Management District, to Wienke Tax, US
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, dated
May 8, 2013, in the docket for today’s action.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2007 and July 5, 2007 under EPA’s
Exceptional Events Rule (72 FR 28612,
May 22, 2007). The exceptional events
requests were submitted to EPA by
CARB on October 23, 2009 and
December 22, 2009, respectively. The
letter also requested EPA to
acknowledge the requests if EPA did not
evaluate these requests before taking
final action on this proposal.
Response: EPA received two
exceptional events requests from CARB
for South Coast monitoring data from
2007 on October 23, 2009 and December
22, 2009. EPA is not taking any action
on the exceptional events requests cited
in the District’s comment letter. It is not
necessary for EPA to process those
requests because this final action is
based on monitored data occurring after
the time of those requests. Therefore,
whether we granted or denied the
exceptional events requests concerning
data from 2007, it would not have any
bearing on our action today.
III. EPA’s Final Action
Based on our review of the 2009
South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan
submitted by the State, air quality
monitoring data, and other relevant
materials, EPA finds that the State has
addressed all the necessary
requirements for redesignation of the
South Coast air basin to attainment of
the PM10 NAAQS, pursuant to CAA
sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A.
First, under CAA section 107(d)(3)(D),
we are approving CARB’s request,
which accompanied the submittal of the
maintenance plan, to redesignate the
South Coast PM10 nonattainment area to
attainment for the 24-hour PM10
NAAQS. We are doing so based on our
conclusion that the area has met the five
criteria for redesignation under CAA
section 107(d)(3)(E). Our conclusion is
based on our determination that the area
has attained the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS;
that relevant portions of the California
SIP are fully approved; that the
improvement in air quality is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions; that California has met all
requirements applicable to the South
Coast PM10 nonattainment area with
respect to section 110 and part D of the
CAA; and that we are approving the
South Coast PM10 maintenance plan as
part of today’s action.
Second, in connection with the 2009
South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan, EPA is
finding that the maintenance
demonstration showing how the area
will continue to attain the 24-hour PM10
NAAQS for at least 10 years beyond
redesignation (i.e., through 2030) and
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
the associated motor vehicle emissions
budgets meet applicable CAA
requirements for maintenance plans and
transportation conformity requirements
under 40 CFR 93.118(e). We are also
approving the 2010 emissions inventory
as meeting the applicable requirements
for emissions inventories in CAA
sections 175A and 172.
With today’s action, we are finalizing
our approval of the motor vehicle
emissions budgets. After the effective
date of today’s final rule, the approved
budgets must be used in any future
regional emissions analysis for PM10
conducted by the local metropolitan
planning organization, the Southern
California Association of Governments,
and the Federal Highway
Administration.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a
maintenance plan under section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by State law. A redesignation
to attainment does not in and of itself
create any new requirements, but rather
results in the applicability of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. For
these reasons, these actions:
• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:54 Jun 25, 2013
Jkt 229001
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Are not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Are not a significant regulatory
action subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• Are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the final
action does not apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law. Nonetheless, in accordance
with EPA’s 2011 Policy on Consultation
and Coordination with Tribes, EPA has
notified Tribes located within the South
Coast PM10 nonattainment area of this
action.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by August 26, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38225
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: June 12, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(426) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(426) The following plan was
submitted on April 28, 2010, by the
Governor’s Designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Final PM10 Redesignation Request
and Maintenance Plan for the South
Coast Air Basin (December 2009) (2009
South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan),
adopted January 8, 2010.
(2) SCAQMD Board Resolution 10–1,
dated January 8, 2010, adopting the
2009 South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan.
(B) State of California Air Resources
Board.
(1) CARB Resolution 10–21, dated
March 25, 2010, adopting the 2009
South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan.
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
38226
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
PART 81—[AMENDED]
Subpart C—[Amended]
3. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
4. Section 81.305 is amended in the
table for ‘‘California-PM–10’’ by revising
the entry under Riverside, Los Angeles,
Orange, and San Bernardino Counties
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
for the ‘‘South Coast Air Basin’’ to read
as follows:
§ 81.305
*
California.
*
*
*
*
CALIFORNIA—PM–10
Designation
Classification
Designated area
Date
*
*
*
Riverside, Los Angeles, Orange, and San Bernardino Counties.
South Coast Air Basin ......................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0889; FRL–9391–4]
Sulfoxaflor; Pesticide Tolerances;
Technical Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
EPA issued a final rule in the
Federal Register of May 17, 2013,
concerning the establishment of
tolerances for the insecticide sulfoxaflor
on multiple commodities. This
document corrects an inadvertent error
by moving the tolerances established
under 40 CFR 180.670 to 40 CFR
180.668 and removing § 180.670. This
document additionally removes the
time-limited tolerances for cotton,
undelinted seed; cotton, gin byproducts;
and cotton, hulls as the tolerances have
been superseded by permanent
tolerances.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
26, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0889, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
15:54 Jun 25, 2013
Date
Type
*
........................
*
.................................................
*
........................
*
........................
7/26/13
Attainment ..............................
........................
........................
*
[FR Doc. 2013–15145 Filed 6–25–13; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Type
Jkt 229001
*
*
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Urbanski, Registration Division,
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 347–0156; email address:
urbanski.jennifer@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
The Agency included in the final rule
a list of those who may be potentially
affected by this action.
II. What does this technical correction
do?
EPA issued a final rule in the Federal
Register on May 17, 2013 (78 FR 29041),
establishing tolerances for residues of
the insecticide sulfoxaflor in or on
multiple commodities. That rule
incorrectly established tolerances for
sulfoxaflor in a new section of 40 CFR
part 180 (§ 180.670). Instead of creating
a new section for these tolerances, EPA
should have added those newly
established sulfoxaflor tolerances to the
already existing sulfoxaflor tolerances
contained in 40 CFR 180.668. The
incorrect regulatory designations were
due to an inadvertent error in the
Federal Register publication. Therefore,
this action corrects this error by
transferring the tolerances contained in
§ 180.670 to § 180.668 and removes
§ 180.670. In addition, EPA is removing
the time-limited tolerances for cotton,
undelinted seed; cotton, gin byproducts;
and cotton, hulls contained in
paragraph (b) of § 180.668 since these
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
time-limited tolerances have been
superseded by permanent tolerances
that were established in the May 17,
2013 rule (78 FR 29041).
III. Why is this correction issued as a
final rule?
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an
agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a final
rule without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. EPA
has determined that there is good cause
for making this technical correction
final without prior proposal and
opportunity for comment, because this
action does not make any substantive
alterations in the existing tolerances. It
is merely a housekeeping measure.
Today’s action merges the contents of
two existing regulations that contain
sulfoxaflor tolerances and removes the
time-limited tolerances contained in
§ 180.668(b) since they have been
superseded by permanent tolerances
contained in paragraph (a). EPA finds
that this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
IV. Do any of the statutory and
executive order reviews apply to this
action?
This final rule implements a technical
correction to the Code of Federal
Regulations, and it does not otherwise
impose or amend any requirements.
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
is therefore not subject to OMB review.
Because this action is not subject to
notice and comment requirements
under the Administrative Procedures
Act or any other statute, it is not subject
E:\FR\FM\26JNR1.SGM
26JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38223-38226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15145]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0007; FRL-9826-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Designation of
Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; California; South Coast Air
Basin; Approval of PM10 Maintenance Plan and Redesignation
to Attainment for the PM10 Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving, as a revision to the California State
implementation plan (SIP), the State's request to redesignate the Los
Angeles-South Coast Air Basin (South Coast) to attainment for the 24-
hour particulate matter of ten microns or less (PM10)
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). EPA is also approving
the PM10 maintenance plan and the associated PM10
motor vehicle emissions budgets for use in transportation conformity
determinations necessary for the South Coast PM10 area.
Finally, EPA is approving the attainment year emissions inventory. EPA
is taking these actions because the SIP revision meets the
[[Page 38224]]
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA guidance for such plans
and motor vehicle emissions budgets.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on July 26, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may inspect the supporting information for this action,
identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0007, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking portal, https://www.regulations.gov, please
follow the online instructions; or,
2. Visit our regional office at, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., voluminous
records, large maps, copyrighted material), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., Confidential Business
Information). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed
directly below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4192, tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Summary of Proposed Action
II. Public Comment and EPA Response
III. EPA's Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Summary of Proposed Action
On April 8, 2013 (78 FR 20868), based on EPA's review of the Final
PM10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the South Coast Air
Basin (December 2009) (``2009 South Coast PM10 Redesignation
Request and Maintenance Plan'') submitted by California, air quality
monitoring data, and other relevant materials, EPA proposed to approve
the State of California's request to redesignate the South Coast
PM10 nonattainment area to attainment of the PM10
NAAQS, pursuant to CAA sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A. The background
for today's actions is discussed in detail in EPA's April 8, 2013
proposed rulemaking and technical support document (TSD).
We based our conclusion that the area had attained the standard on
our determination that the three years of complete, quality-assured
data for the period 2008-2010 showed that the South Coast
PM10 nonattainment area had attained the PM10
NAAQS.
We also determined based on more recent data that the area
continues to attain the NAAQS based on certified, quality-assured 2012
data. Data for 2013 have not been submitted to EPA's Air Quality System
(AQS) and are not required to be submitted until June 30, 2013.
Our proposed approval of the redesignation request was based on
EPA's finding that the area meets all other CAA redesignation
requirements under section 107(d)(3)(E) and the CAA maintenance plan
requirements under section 175A.
EPA proposed to approve the State's maintenance plan, which
includes SIP-approved control measures for fugitive dust, open burning
and wood burning devices, cement manufacturing, aggregate and related
operations, and paved and unpaved roads, among others. Implementation
of these control measures has resulted in attainment of the
PM10 NAAQS in the South Coast nonattainment area and the
continued implementation of these control measures is expected to
provide for maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS into the future.
We also proposed to approve the motor vehicle emissions budgets
associated with the plan because the plan demonstrated that these
emissions levels, when considered with emissions from all other
sources, were consistent with maintenance of the NAAQS.
Finally, EPA proposed to approve the attainment year emissions
inventory submitted with the maintenance plan as meeting the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3).
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA provided for a 30-day public comment period on our proposed
action. The comment period ended on May 8, 2013. We received one
comment letter from the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD or District) on May 8, 2013.\1\ We respond to that comment
here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See letter, Elaine Chang, DrPH, Deputy Executive Officer,
South Coast Air Quality Management District, to Wienke Tax, US
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, dated May 8, 2013, in
the docket for today's action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: SCAQMD strongly supports EPA's proposed action. The
District also commented that it submitted, through CARB, exceptional
events packages requesting exclusion of monitoring data from multiple
sites in the SCAQMD network from October 21, 2007 and July 5, 2007
under EPA's Exceptional Events Rule (72 FR 28612, May 22, 2007). The
exceptional events requests were submitted to EPA by CARB on October
23, 2009 and December 22, 2009, respectively. The letter also requested
EPA to acknowledge the requests if EPA did not evaluate these requests
before taking final action on this proposal.
Response: EPA received two exceptional events requests from CARB
for South Coast monitoring data from 2007 on October 23, 2009 and
December 22, 2009. EPA is not taking any action on the exceptional
events requests cited in the District's comment letter. It is not
necessary for EPA to process those requests because this final action
is based on monitored data occurring after the time of those requests.
Therefore, whether we granted or denied the exceptional events requests
concerning data from 2007, it would not have any bearing on our action
today.
III. EPA's Final Action
Based on our review of the 2009 South Coast PM10
Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan submitted by the State, air
quality monitoring data, and other relevant materials, EPA finds that
the State has addressed all the necessary requirements for
redesignation of the South Coast air basin to attainment of the
PM10 NAAQS, pursuant to CAA sections 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A.
First, under CAA section 107(d)(3)(D), we are approving CARB's
request, which accompanied the submittal of the maintenance plan, to
redesignate the South Coast PM10 nonattainment area to
attainment for the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS. We are doing so based
on our conclusion that the area has met the five criteria for
redesignation under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E). Our conclusion is based
on our determination that the area has attained the 24-hour
PM10 NAAQS; that relevant portions of the California SIP are
fully approved; that the improvement in air quality is due to permanent
and enforceable reductions in emissions; that California has met all
requirements applicable to the South Coast PM10
nonattainment area with respect to section 110 and part D of the CAA;
and that we are approving the South Coast PM10 maintenance
plan as part of today's action.
Second, in connection with the 2009 South Coast PM10
Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan, EPA is finding that the
maintenance demonstration showing how the area will continue to attain
the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS for at least 10 years beyond
redesignation (i.e., through 2030) and
[[Page 38225]]
the associated motor vehicle emissions budgets meet applicable CAA
requirements for maintenance plans and transportation conformity
requirements under 40 CFR 93.118(e). We are also approving the 2010
emissions inventory as meeting the applicable requirements for
emissions inventories in CAA sections 175A and 172.
With today's action, we are finalizing our approval of the motor
vehicle emissions budgets. After the effective date of today's final
rule, the approved budgets must be used in any future regional
emissions analysis for PM10 conducted by the local
metropolitan planning organization, the Southern California Association
of Governments, and the Federal Highway Administration.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E)
are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by State law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of
itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the
applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have
been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the
Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For these reasons,
these actions:
Are not ``significant regulatory actions'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Are not an economically significant regulatory action
based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Are not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the final action does not apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. Nonetheless, in
accordance with EPA's 2011 Policy on Consultation and Coordination with
Tribes, EPA has notified Tribes located within the South Coast
PM10 nonattainment area of this action.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 26, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: June 12, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(426) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(426) The following plan was submitted on April 28, 2010, by the
Governor's Designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(1) Final PM10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance
Plan for the South Coast Air Basin (December 2009) (2009 South Coast
PM10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan), adopted
January 8, 2010.
(2) SCAQMD Board Resolution 10-1, dated January 8, 2010, adopting
the 2009 South Coast PM10 Redesignation Request and
Maintenance Plan.
(B) State of California Air Resources Board.
(1) CARB Resolution 10-21, dated March 25, 2010, adopting the 2009
South Coast PM10 Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan.
[[Page 38226]]
PART 81--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C--[Amended]
0
4. Section 81.305 is amended in the table for ``California-PM-10'' by
revising the entry under Riverside, Los Angeles, Orange, and San
Bernardino Counties for the ``South Coast Air Basin'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 81.305 California.
* * * * *
California--PM-10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated area -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type Date Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Riverside, Los Angeles, Orange, and .............. ........................ .............. ..............
San Bernardino Counties.
South Coast Air Basin............. 7/26/13 Attainment.............. .............. ..............
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-15145 Filed 6-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P