Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Internet Nonprobability Panel Pretesting, 37783-37784 [2013-14982]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 121 / Monday, June 24, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
linked data will be used to conduct
research designed to help the Census
Bureau improve its methods of
collecting program participation data, as
well as its record linking methods. This
linkage will be accomplished using a
unique linkage identifier called a
Protected Identification Key (PIK). After
the linkage is achieved, Personally
Identifiable Information will be
removed from the linked files.
Processing to assign a PIK to each
person record involves matching based
on name, address, sex, date of birth, and
Social Security Number (SSN) data.
While States may share SSN for
Nutrition Assistance recipients to
improve the quality of the matching
process, most Census Bureau surveys do
not collect SSN thereby precluding an
exact match. The validation of data
processing and PIK process has been
used by other internal and external
Census Bureau research projects. Only
Census Bureau staff conducting the
record linkage will have access to files
with the Personally Identifiable
Information, and access to those files
assigned a PIK will be limited to those
with a need to know.
The Census Bureau will return
tabulated Nutrition Assistance data to
the FNS and the participating State
Agencies. This information will help
FNS and the State Agencies develop
better measures of poverty, analyze the
demographic characteristics of
participants, review enrollment rates for
those eligible for assistance, and analyze
the effects of state programs on a variety
of outcomes. The Census Bureau will
benefit by using the Nutrition
Assistance data to improve its Title 13,
U.S. Code (U.S.C), authorized censuses
and surveys. The Census Bureau will
evaluate the quality of the linked data
to: Improve Census Bureau household
survey coverage; provide a basis for
improving Census Bureau demographic
survey program participation questions;
gain a greater understanding of data
quality collected in Census Bureau
household surveys on food assistance
program participation, household
composition and income; and evaluate
and improve data linking software and
techniques in USDA food assistance
program participation research.
II. Method of Collection
The Census Bureau will contact the
State Agencies to discuss the research
proposal and use of state agency
administrative records. The State
Agencies will set up agreements with
the Census Bureau to provide Nutrition
Assistance data. The State Agency will
transfer State nutrition administrative
records to the Census Bureau via secure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Jun 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
File Transfer Protocol or appropriately
encrypted CD–ROM or DVD–ROM.
When the Census Bureau receives data
from the source files, the data are
processed to validate identifying
information and unique person and
address-matching identifiers appended.
The administrative records data are then
compared to current demographic
survey data to evaluate coverage of the
survey frame, assess data quality, and
produce research papers. The Nutrition
Assistance data will also be integrated
into the Center for Administrative
Records, Research and Applications
(CARRA) administrative records
infrastructure.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: Information will be
collected in the form of a data transfer
to the Census Bureau. No form will be
used.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: State governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
51.
Estimated Time per Response: 75
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,825 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$80,325.
Respondents Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. Section 6
and 8(b).
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 19, 2013.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–14987 Filed 6–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37783
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
U.S. Bureau of the Census
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Generic Clearance
for Internet Nonprobability Panel
Pretesting
U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before August 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instruments(s) and instructions should
be directed to Jennifer Hunter Childs,
U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill
Road, Washington, DC 20233–9150,
(202) 603–4827 (or via the Internet at
jennifer.hunter.childs@census.gov).
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Census Bureau plans to request a
new OMB generic clearance to conduct
a variety of medium-scale iterative
Internet research pretesting activities. A
block of hours will be dedicated to these
activities for each of the next three
years. OMB will be informed in writing
of the purpose and scope of each of
these activities, as well as the time
frame and number of burden hours
used. The number of hours used will
not exceed the number set aside for this
purpose.
The Census Bureau is committed to
conducting research in a cost efficient
manner. Currently, there are several
stages of testing that occur in any
research project the U.S. Census Bureau
conducts. As a first stage of research, the
Census Bureau pretests questions on
surveys or censuses and evaluates the
usability and ease of use of Web sites
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
37784
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 121 / Monday, June 24, 2013 / Notices
using a small number of subjects during
focus groups, usability and cognitive
testing. These projects are in-person and
labor intensive, but typically only target
samples of 20 to 30 respondents. Often
the second stage is a larger scale field
test with a split panel design of a survey
or a release of a Census Bureau data
dissemination product with a feedback
mechanism. These stages often involve
a lot of preparatory work and often are
limited in the number of panels tested
due to the cost considerations. They are
often targeted at very large sample sizes
with over 10,000 respondents per panel.
Cost efficiencies can occur by testing
some research questions in a mediumscale test, using a smaller number of
participants than what we typically use
in a field test, yet a larger and more
diverse set of participants than who we
recruit for cognitive and usability tests.
Using Internet nonprobability panel
pretesting, we can answer some research
questions more thoroughly than in the
small-scale testing, but less expensively
than in the large-scale test. This generic
clearance seeks to establish a mediumscale (defined as having sample sizes
from 100–2000 per study), cost-efficient
method of testing questions and contact
strategies over the internet through a
nonprobability sample.
For example, email has been
identified as a possible cost-effective
notification strategy for online data
collection. Email has not been used
extensively as a notification mode for
past censuses nor other government
surveys. Prior to implementing an email
strategy, the Census Bureau needs to
determine the best email invitation in
order to maximize click-through rates.
The numerous email variations would
be cost prohibitive in a large-scale test.
Medium-scale testing of email variations
is more efficient. This generic clearance
will be used to answer some
fundamental questions about how to
optimize email (and possibly text
message) contacts.
This research program will be used by
the Census Bureau and survey sponsors
to test alternative contact methods,
including emails and text messages (via
an opt-in strategy), improve online
questionnaires and procedures, reduce
respondent burden, and ultimately
increase the quality of data collected in
the Census Bureau censuses and
surveys. The clearance will be used to
conduct pretesting of decennial and
demographic census and survey
questionnaires as well as
communications and/or marketing
strategies and data dissemination tools
for the Census Bureau prior to fielding
them. The primary method of
identifying measurement problems with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:13 Jun 21, 2013
Jkt 229001
the questionnaire or survey procedure is
split panel tests. This will encompass
both methodological and subject matter
research questions that can be tested on
a medium-scale nonprobability panel.
This research program will also be
used by the Census Bureau for remote
usability testing of electronic interfaces
and to perform other qualitative analysis
such as respondent debriefings.
Advantages of using the remote,
medium-scale testing is that participants
can test products at their convenience
using their own equipment, as opposed
to using Census Bureau supplied
computers. A diverse participant pool,
whether that was geographically,
demographically, or economically, is
another advantage. Remote usability
testing would use paradata, accuracy
and satisfaction scores, and written
qualitative comments to determine
optimal interface designs and to obtain
feedback from respondents.
For the initial phase of this study, the
public will be offered an opportunity to
participate in this research remotely, by
signing up for an online research panel.
If a person opts-in, the Census Bureau
will occasionally email (or text, if
applicable) the person an invitation to
complete a survey for one of our
research projects. Invited respondents
will be told the topic of the survey, and
how long it will take to complete it.
If the initial phase is successful, it
will be followed by extended research,
which will employ cold-contact emails
to validate findings from the initial
phase and expand the research.
II. Method of Collection
The Internet will be the primary
method of data collection. Mail or
phone prenotice and/or telephone
follow-up may be used in some cases.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: Various.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
50,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 10
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 8,333.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is
no cost to respondent, except for their
time to complete the questionnaire.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Authority: 13 U.S.C. 131, 141, 161, 181,
182, 193, and 301.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including house and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 19, 2013.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–14982 Filed 6–21–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–63–2013]
Foreign-Trade Zone 65—Panama City,
Florida; Application for Reorganization
Under Alternative Site Framework
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by
the Panama City Port Authority, grantee
of FTZ 65, requesting authority to
reorganize the zone under the
alternative site framework (ASF)
adopted by the FTZ Board (15 CFR Sec.
400.2(c)). The ASF is an option for
grantees for the establishment or
reorganization of zones and can permit
significantly greater flexibility in the
designation of new subzones or ‘‘usagedriven’’ FTZ sites for operators/users
located within a grantee’s ‘‘service area’’
in the context of the FTZ Board’s
standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
a zone. The application was submitted
pursuant to the Foreign-Trade Zones
Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u),
and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR
part 400). It was formally docketed on
June 18, 2013.
FTZ 65 was approved by the FTZ
Board on January 16, 1981 (Board Order
171, 46 FR 8072, 1/26/81), and
expanded on March 3, 1987 (Board
Order 343, 52 FR 7634, 3/12/87), and on
September 25, 2009 (Board Order 1646,
74 FR 53216, 10/16/09). The current
zone includes the following sites: Site 1
(125 acres)—Port Panama City Industrial
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 121 (Monday, June 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37783-37784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14982]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
U.S. Bureau of the Census
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Generic
Clearance for Internet Nonprobability Panel Pretesting
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before August 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instruments(s) and instructions
should be directed to Jennifer Hunter Childs, U.S. Census Bureau, 4600
Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233-9150, (202) 603-4827 (or via the
Internet at jennifer.hunter.childs@census.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Census Bureau plans to request a new OMB generic clearance to
conduct a variety of medium-scale iterative Internet research
pretesting activities. A block of hours will be dedicated to these
activities for each of the next three years. OMB will be informed in
writing of the purpose and scope of each of these activities, as well
as the time frame and number of burden hours used. The number of hours
used will not exceed the number set aside for this purpose.
The Census Bureau is committed to conducting research in a cost
efficient manner. Currently, there are several stages of testing that
occur in any research project the U.S. Census Bureau conducts. As a
first stage of research, the Census Bureau pretests questions on
surveys or censuses and evaluates the usability and ease of use of Web
sites
[[Page 37784]]
using a small number of subjects during focus groups, usability and
cognitive testing. These projects are in-person and labor intensive,
but typically only target samples of 20 to 30 respondents. Often the
second stage is a larger scale field test with a split panel design of
a survey or a release of a Census Bureau data dissemination product
with a feedback mechanism. These stages often involve a lot of
preparatory work and often are limited in the number of panels tested
due to the cost considerations. They are often targeted at very large
sample sizes with over 10,000 respondents per panel.
Cost efficiencies can occur by testing some research questions in a
medium-scale test, using a smaller number of participants than what we
typically use in a field test, yet a larger and more diverse set of
participants than who we recruit for cognitive and usability tests.
Using Internet nonprobability panel pretesting, we can answer some
research questions more thoroughly than in the small-scale testing, but
less expensively than in the large-scale test. This generic clearance
seeks to establish a medium-scale (defined as having sample sizes from
100-2000 per study), cost-efficient method of testing questions and
contact strategies over the internet through a nonprobability sample.
For example, email has been identified as a possible cost-effective
notification strategy for online data collection. Email has not been
used extensively as a notification mode for past censuses nor other
government surveys. Prior to implementing an email strategy, the Census
Bureau needs to determine the best email invitation in order to
maximize click-through rates. The numerous email variations would be
cost prohibitive in a large-scale test. Medium-scale testing of email
variations is more efficient. This generic clearance will be used to
answer some fundamental questions about how to optimize email (and
possibly text message) contacts.
This research program will be used by the Census Bureau and survey
sponsors to test alternative contact methods, including emails and text
messages (via an opt-in strategy), improve online questionnaires and
procedures, reduce respondent burden, and ultimately increase the
quality of data collected in the Census Bureau censuses and surveys.
The clearance will be used to conduct pretesting of decennial and
demographic census and survey questionnaires as well as communications
and/or marketing strategies and data dissemination tools for the Census
Bureau prior to fielding them. The primary method of identifying
measurement problems with the questionnaire or survey procedure is
split panel tests. This will encompass both methodological and subject
matter research questions that can be tested on a medium-scale
nonprobability panel.
This research program will also be used by the Census Bureau for
remote usability testing of electronic interfaces and to perform other
qualitative analysis such as respondent debriefings. Advantages of
using the remote, medium-scale testing is that participants can test
products at their convenience using their own equipment, as opposed to
using Census Bureau supplied computers. A diverse participant pool,
whether that was geographically, demographically, or economically, is
another advantage. Remote usability testing would use paradata,
accuracy and satisfaction scores, and written qualitative comments to
determine optimal interface designs and to obtain feedback from
respondents.
For the initial phase of this study, the public will be offered an
opportunity to participate in this research remotely, by signing up for
an online research panel. If a person opts-in, the Census Bureau will
occasionally email (or text, if applicable) the person an invitation to
complete a survey for one of our research projects. Invited respondents
will be told the topic of the survey, and how long it will take to
complete it.
If the initial phase is successful, it will be followed by extended
research, which will employ cold-contact emails to validate findings
from the initial phase and expand the research.
II. Method of Collection
The Internet will be the primary method of data collection. Mail or
phone prenotice and/or telephone follow-up may be used in some cases.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: Various.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or Households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 50,000.
Estimated Time per Response: 10 minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 8,333.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: There is no cost to respondent, except
for their time to complete the questionnaire.
Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
Authority: 13 U.S.C. 131, 141, 161, 181, 182, 193, and 301.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including house and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 19, 2013.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-14982 Filed 6-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P