Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments for a New Information Collection, 37648-37649 [2013-14871]
Download as PDF
37648
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2013 / Notices
comply with the requirements of the
Privacy Act, as amended.
it may extend for an additional 12
months thereafter.
Kirsten J. Moncada,
Executive Director, Office of Privacy and
Disclosure, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013–14808 Filed 6–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
Notice of Computer Matching Program,
SSA With the Railroad Retirement
Board (RRB)
A. Participating Agencies
B. Purpose of the Matching Program
The purpose of this matching program
is to set forth the terms, conditions, and
safeguards under which RRB, as the
source agency, will disclose RRB
annuity payment data to us, the
recipient agency. We will use the
information to verify Supplemental
Security Income (SSI) and Special
Veterans Benefits (SVB) eligibility and
benefit payment amounts. We will also
record the railroad annuity amounts
RRB paid to SSI and SVB recipients in
the Supplemental Security Income
Record (SSR).
C. Authority for Conducting the
Matching Program
The legal authority for the disclosure
under this agreement for the SSI portion
are sections 1631(e)(1)(A) and (B) and
1631(f) of the Social Security Act (Act)
(42 U.S.C. 1383(e)(1)(A) and (B) and
1383(f)). The legal authority for the
disclosure under this agreement for the
SVB portion is section 806(b) of the Act
(42 U.S.C. 1006(b)).
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
D. Categories of Records and Persons
Covered by the Matching Program
RRB will provide us with an
electronic data file containing annuity
payment data from RRB’s system of
records, RRB–22 Railroad Retirement,
Survivor, and Pensioner Benefits
System, last published on July 26, 2012
(75 FR 43727). We will match RRB’s
data with data maintained in the SSR,
Supplemental Security Income Record
and Special Veterans Benefits, SSA/
ODSSIS, 60–0103, last published on
January 11, 2006 (71 FR 1830). SVB data
also resides on the SSR.
E. Inclusive Dates of the Matching
Program
The effective date of this matching
program is September 2, 2013, provided
that the following notice periods have
lapsed: 30 days after publication of this
notice in the Federal Register and 40
days after notice of the matching
program is sent to Congress and OMB.
The matching program will continue for
18 months from the effective date and,
if both agencies meet certain conditions,
18:32 Jun 20, 2013
Federal Aviation Administration
Space Transportation Infrastructure
Matching (STIM) Grants Program
SSA and RRB
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Jkt 229001
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of non-availability of
Space Transportation Infrastructure
Matching Grants in FY 2013.
AGENCY:
The Office of Commercial
Space Transportation (AST) will not
solicit or award grants under the STIM
program this fiscal year.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Graham (AST–100), Office of
Commercial Space Transportation
(AST), 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Room 331, Washington, DC 20591,
telephone (202) 267–8568; Email
doug.graham@faa.gov.
SUMMARY:
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 10,
2013.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial
Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2013–14859 Filed 6–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2013–0030]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments for a
New Information Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
FHWA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) approval for a new information
collection, which is summarized below
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
published a Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day public comment period
on this information collection on
February 15, 2013. We are required to
publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by July
22, 2013.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
You may send comments
within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503,
Attention DOT Desk Officer. You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
All comments should include the
Docket number FHWA–2013–0030.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane D. Boone, 202–493–3064,
Nondestructive Evaluation Research
Program, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of
Transportation, 6300 Georgetown Pike,
McLean, VA 22101. Office hours are
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Non-Destructive Inspection
Protocol for Reinforced Concrete
Highway Barriers and Bridge Railings.
Background: Highway barriers and
bridge railings serve to prevent errant
vehicles from departing the travelway at
grade separations. Most bridge railings
are made of reinforced concrete. Despite
the important role that they play in
maintaining safety and their ubiquitous
nature, barrier inspection rarely moves
beyond visual inspection. In August of
2008, tractor-trailer dislodged a section
of barrier on the William Preston Lane,
Jr. Memorial Bridge. Portions of the
displaced barrier separated and the
tractor-trailer fatally departed the
bridge. Investigations following the
accident identified significant corrosion
of the anchor bolts attaching the bridge
railing to the bridge deck.
As a result of the information
gathered during its investigation of the
accident, the National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) made
recommendations to the Federal
Highway Administration concerning
Non-Destructive Evaluation of concrete
bridge railings. One of these
recommendations (H–10–18) is as
follows:
ADDRESSES:
Expand the research and development of
nondestructive evaluation technologies to
develop bridge inspection methods that
augment visual inspections; offer reliable
measurement techniques; and are practical,
both in terms of time and cost, for field
inspection work; and promote the use of
these technologies by bridge owners.
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 120 / Friday, June 21, 2013 / Notices
The barrier on the Preston Lane, Jr.
Memorial Bridge was unique in that the
anchor bolts connecting the barrier to
the deck were exposed. This exposure
allowed inspection of the remaining
anchor bolts directly using ultrasonic
testing. In contrast, most barriers have
configurations where the steel
anchorage is completely embedded in
the deck and barrier.
Most reinforced concrete barriers are
anchored to the deck of a bridge or
retaining wall using reinforcing steel
protruding from the main structure or
by anchored bars or bolts during
retrofits. Corrosion of steel bars or bolts
can weaken this attachment and reduce
the capacity of the barrier. The most
direct damage resulting from corrosion
is the reduction of steel diameter and
cross-sectional area. Steel corrosion in
concrete is caused primarily by two
reasons: chloride induced corrosion and
carbonation induced corrosion. Barriers
are generally located at or very near the
gutter-line of a roadway and may have
significant long-term exposure to
corrosive deicing materials.
It is beyond the capacity of visual
inspection to identify and evaluate
concrete voids and corrosion of
anchorage mechanisms embedded in
concrete. A literature review revealed
that some promising research has been
done using NDE methods to evaluate
reinforced concrete and the embedded
steel reinforcement.
Effective corrosion detection methods
are just one piece of the barrier and
railing maintenance puzzle.
Identification of when to use advanced
NDE tools as well as to what level the
capacity is likely impacted by the
measured deterioration will be
examined as a part of this project. In
order to most effectively investigate the
correct barrier and railing designs, it
was noted that input from the state
DOTs was required. Thus, a survey to
determine what protocols for design,
fabrication, installation, and inspection
was created and should be disseminated
to the 50 state DOTs and also to the DC
and Puerto Rico DOTs.
Respondents: All 50 state DOTs and
also DC and Puerto Rico DOTs. 52 total.
Frequency: Once.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: Approximately 2 hours to
collect the necessary information and 1
hour to fill out the survey.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: Approximately 156 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of this
information collection, including: (1)
Whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:32 Jun 20, 2013
Jkt 229001
burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burden could be
minimized, including the use of
electronic technology, without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: June 17, 2013.
Michael Howell,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–14871 Filed 6–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2013–0034]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments for a
New Information Collection
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The FHWA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) approval for a new information
collection, which is summarized below
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
are required to publish this notice in the
Federal Register by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by
August 20, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID 2013–0034
by any of the following methods:
Web site: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37649
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Ferroni, 202–366–3233, Office of
Planning, Environment, and Realty,
Federal Highway Administration,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Office hours are from 6:00
a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Noise Barrier Inventory.
Background: The basis of the Federalaid highway program is a strong federalstate partnership. At the core of that
partnership is a philosophy of trust and
flexibility, and a belief that the states are
in the best position to make investment
decisions and that states base these
decisions on the needs and priorities of
their citizens. The FHWA noise
regulation (23 CFR part 772) gives each
state department of transportation
(SDOT) flexibility to determine the
feasibility and reasonableness of noise
abatement by balancing of the benefits
of noise abatement against the overall
adverse social, economic, and
environmental effects and costs of the
noise abatement measures. The SDOT
must base its determination on the
interest of the overall public good,
keeping in mind all the elements of the
highway program (need, funding,
environmental impacts, public
involvement, etc.).
Reduction of highway traffic noise
should occur through a program of
shared responsibility with the most
effective strategy being implementation
of noise compatible planning and land
use control strategies by state and local
governments. Local governments can
use their power to regulate land
development to prohibit noise-sensitive
land use development adjacent to a
highway, or to require that developers
plan, design, and construct
development in ways that minimize
noise impacts. The FHWA noise
regulations limit Federal participation
in the construction of noise barriers
along existing highways to those
projects proposed along lands where
land development or substantial
construction predated the existence of
any highway.
The data reflects the flexibility in
noise abatement decision-making. Some
states have built many noise barriers
while a few have built none. Through
the end of 2010, 47 SDOTs and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico have
constructed over 2,748 linear miles of
barriers at a cost of over $4.05 billion
($5.44 billion in 2010 dollars). Three
states and the District of Columbia have
not constructed noise barriers. Ten
SDOTs account for approximately sixty-
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37648-37649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14871]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2013-0030]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments
for a New Information Collection
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FHWA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval for a new
information collection, which is summarized below under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. We published a Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
public comment period on this information collection on February 15,
2013. We are required to publish this notice in the Federal Register by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Please submit comments by July 22, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments within 30 days to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention DOT Desk Officer.
You are asked to comment on any aspect of this information collection,
including: (1) Whether the proposed collection is necessary for the
FHWA's performance; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways
for the FHWA to enhance the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
collected information; and (4) ways that the burden could be minimized,
including the use of electronic technology, without reducing the
quality of the collected information. All comments should include the
Docket number FHWA-2013-0030.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane D. Boone, 202-493-3064,
Nondestructive Evaluation Research Program, Federal Highway
Administration, Department of Transportation, 6300 Georgetown Pike,
McLean, VA 22101. Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Non-Destructive Inspection Protocol for Reinforced Concrete
Highway Barriers and Bridge Railings.
Background: Highway barriers and bridge railings serve to prevent
errant vehicles from departing the travelway at grade separations. Most
bridge railings are made of reinforced concrete. Despite the important
role that they play in maintaining safety and their ubiquitous nature,
barrier inspection rarely moves beyond visual inspection. In August of
2008, tractor-trailer dislodged a section of barrier on the William
Preston Lane, Jr. Memorial Bridge. Portions of the displaced barrier
separated and the tractor-trailer fatally departed the bridge.
Investigations following the accident identified significant corrosion
of the anchor bolts attaching the bridge railing to the bridge deck.
As a result of the information gathered during its investigation of
the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) made
recommendations to the Federal Highway Administration concerning Non-
Destructive Evaluation of concrete bridge railings. One of these
recommendations (H-10-18) is as follows:
Expand the research and development of nondestructive evaluation
technologies to develop bridge inspection methods that augment
visual inspections; offer reliable measurement techniques; and are
practical, both in terms of time and cost, for field inspection
work; and promote the use of these technologies by bridge owners.
[[Page 37649]]
The barrier on the Preston Lane, Jr. Memorial Bridge was unique in
that the anchor bolts connecting the barrier to the deck were exposed.
This exposure allowed inspection of the remaining anchor bolts directly
using ultrasonic testing. In contrast, most barriers have
configurations where the steel anchorage is completely embedded in the
deck and barrier.
Most reinforced concrete barriers are anchored to the deck of a
bridge or retaining wall using reinforcing steel protruding from the
main structure or by anchored bars or bolts during retrofits. Corrosion
of steel bars or bolts can weaken this attachment and reduce the
capacity of the barrier. The most direct damage resulting from
corrosion is the reduction of steel diameter and cross-sectional area.
Steel corrosion in concrete is caused primarily by two reasons:
chloride induced corrosion and carbonation induced corrosion. Barriers
are generally located at or very near the gutter-line of a roadway and
may have significant long-term exposure to corrosive deicing materials.
It is beyond the capacity of visual inspection to identify and
evaluate concrete voids and corrosion of anchorage mechanisms embedded
in concrete. A literature review revealed that some promising research
has been done using NDE methods to evaluate reinforced concrete and the
embedded steel reinforcement.
Effective corrosion detection methods are just one piece of the
barrier and railing maintenance puzzle. Identification of when to use
advanced NDE tools as well as to what level the capacity is likely
impacted by the measured deterioration will be examined as a part of
this project. In order to most effectively investigate the correct
barrier and railing designs, it was noted that input from the state
DOTs was required. Thus, a survey to determine what protocols for
design, fabrication, installation, and inspection was created and
should be disseminated to the 50 state DOTs and also to the DC and
Puerto Rico DOTs.
Respondents: All 50 state DOTs and also DC and Puerto Rico DOTs. 52
total.
Frequency: Once.
Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 2 hours to
collect the necessary information and 1 hour to fill out the survey.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: Approximately 156 hours.
Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the FHWA's performance; (2) the accuracy of
the estimated burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4) ways that
the burden could be minimized, including the use of electronic
technology, without reducing the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or include your comments in the request
for OMB's clearance of this information collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: June 17, 2013.
Michael Howell,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-14871 Filed 6-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P