Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Construction at Bremerton Ferry Terminal, 36527-36532 [2013-14494]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
within 12 nautical miles from Maine’s
seaward boundary.
Dated: June 12, 2013.
´
Jean-Pierre Ple,
Acting Director, Office of International
Affairs, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–14477 Filed 6–13–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC172
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental
to Specified Activities; Construction at
Bremerton Ferry Terminal
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
take authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
to take, by harassment, small numbers
of six species of marine mammals
incidental to vibratory pile driving and
pile removal activities at the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal in Washington State
between September 2013 and August
2014.
DATES: Effective September 1, 2013,
through August 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Requests for information on
the incidental take authorization should
be addressed to P. Michael Payne, Chief,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910. A copy of the application
containing a list of the references used
in this document, NMFS’
Environmental Assessment (EA),
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI), and the IHA may be obtained
by writing to the address specified
above or visiting the Internet at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be
viewed, by appointment, during regular
business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
36527
Background
Description of the Specified Activity
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as ‘‘. . . an
impact resulting from the specified
activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the species or stock
through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
which citizens of the U.S. can apply for
a one-year authorization to incidentally
take small numbers of marine mammals
by harassment, provided that there is no
potential for serious injury or mortality
to result from the activity. Section
101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time
limit for NMFS review of an application
followed by a 30-day public notice and
comment period on any proposed
authorizations for the incidental
harassment of marine mammals. Within
45 days of the close of the comment
period, NMFS must either issue or deny
the authorization.
Detailed description of the WSDOT’s
wingwalls replacement work at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal is provided
in the Federal Register notice for the
proposed IHA (78 FR 11844; February
20, 2013). Since that time, no changes
have been made to the wingwalls
replacement project at the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal, except that WSDOT
requested the incidental take coverage
to be extended from February 28, 2014,
through August 31, 2014, in case the
project may be postponed. Nevertheless,
the amount of activity and the duration
of actual in-water construction has not
changed. The potential change in work
season will not affect marine mammal
take estimates since the actual
construction duration will not change
and the initial calculation relied on
marine mammal presence in the project
area on annual basis.
The details of WSDOT’s wingwalls
replacement work at Bremerton Ferry
Terminal are provided in the Federal
Register notice for the proposed IHA (78
FR 11844; February 20, 2013). Please
refer to that Federal Register notice for
the description of the specific activity.
Summary of Request
On August 14, 2012, WSDOT
submitted a request to NOAA requesting
an IHA for the possible harassment of
small numbers of six marine mammal
species incidental to construction
associated with the replacement of
wingwalls at the Bremerton Ferry
Terminal in Washington State. On
December 4, 2012, WSDOT submitted a
revised IHA application. The action
discussed in this document is based on
WSDOT’s December 4, 2012, IHA
application.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS’ proposal to issue
an IHA to WSDOT was published in the
Federal Register on February 20, 2013
(78 FR 11844). That notice described, in
detail, WSDOT’s activity, the marine
mammal species that may be affected by
the activity, and the anticipated effects
on marine mammals. During the 30-day
public comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Marine Mammal
Commission (Commission). The
Commission recommends NMFS issue
the IHA to WSDOT, but has asked
NMFS to condition the IHA in certain
respects. Specific comments and
responses are provided below.
Comment 1: The Commission requests
that NMFS justify its conclusion that the
taking will involve only a small number
of southern resident killer whales
(SRKWs) and work with the Fish and
Wildlife Service and the Commission to
develop a policy that sets forth the
criteria and/or thresholds for
determining what constitutes ‘‘small
numbers’’ and ‘‘negligible impact’’ for
the purpose of authorizing incidental
takes of marine mammals
Response: As stated in the Federal
Register for the proposed IHA, WSDOT
is required to implement shutdown
measures if the combined Level B takes
of SRKWs reach to a total of 16 at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal, which is
equivalent to approximately 19% of the
SRKW population. Subsequently, NMFS
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
36528
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
worked with WSDOT on a possible
solution to further reduce takes of
SRKWs. WSDOT agreed that it will take
all practical steps to avoid exposing
SRKWs to sound levels that may result
in harassment by implementing
shutdown measures whenever a SRKW
is sighted in the vicinity of the project
area. In the event a SRKW is not
detected before entering the zone of
influence, NMFS has authorized the
take of no more than four SRKW, which
represents 5% of the existing
population. As we have done in the
past, NMFS will continue to collaborate
with the Commission and Fish and
Wildlife Service on a variety of MMPA
issues, including small numbers and
negligible impact, to strengthen our
collective understanding of how
activities affect marine mammal species
and stocks.
Comment 2: The Commission requests
NMFS require WSDOT to monitor the
Level B harassment zone at least 30
minutes before, during, and 30 minutes
after the pile-removal and -driving
activities to ensure that those activities
are not having an unintended effect on
marine mammals in or near the zone.
Response: NMFS agrees with the
Commission and will require the
WSDOT to monitor the Level B
harassment zone for 30 minutes before,
during, and 30 minutes after the pile
driving and pile removal activities.
Comment 3: The Commission requests
NMFS specify in its authorization that,
after a delay, power down, or shutdown,
the Ferries Division would not resume
activities until the marine mammal (1)
is observed to have left the Level B
harassment zone or (2) has not been
seen or otherwise detected within the
Level B harassment zone for 15 minutes
for small odontocetes and 30 minutes
for mysticetes and large odontocetes,
including killer whales.
Response: As described in detail in
the Federal Register notice for the
proposed IHA, WSDOT’s wingwalls
replacement project at the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal will only use vibratory
pile hammer for pile driving. Marine
mammals are not expected to be injured
(Level A harassment) by WSDOT’s use
of vibratory pile hammers, thereby
obviating the need for an exclusion zone
for this activity. Nevertheless, for
initiation of pile driving and pile
removal activities, WSDOT is required
to monitor the Level B harassment zone
for 30 minutes before, during, and 30
minutes after in-water construction, and
to ramp up vibratory hammer for pile
removal and pile driving, which will
effectively reduce any startle behavior of
marine mammals in the vicinity at the
commencement of the piling activity.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
However, WSDOT is required to
shutdown when a SRKW is sighted in
the vicinity of the project area, or the
potential takes of any SRKW is
approaching the allotted take limit.
Therefore, under such circumstances,
NMFS will require that WSDOT not
resume activities until the killer whale
under the above condition (1) is
observed to have left the Level B
harassment zone or (2) has not been
seen or otherwise detected within the
Level B harassment zone 30 minutes
after a shutdown.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species under
NMFS jurisdiction most likely to occur
in the construction area include Pacific
harbor seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi),
California sea lion (Zalophus
californianus), Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus), killer whale
(Orcinus orca), gray whale (Eschrichtius
robustus), and humpback whale
(Megaptera novaeangliae).
General information on the marine
mammal species found in California
waters can be found in Caretta et al.
(2011), which is available at the
following URL: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/
po2011.pdf. Specific information
concerning these species in the vicinity
of the action area is provided in the
Federal Register notice for the proposed
IHA and in WSDOT’s IHA application.
Therefore, it is not repeated here.
Potential Effects of the Specified
Activity on Marine Mammals
The effects of underwater noise from
in-water vibratory pile driving and pile
removal associated with the
construction activities at the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal has the potential to
result in behavioral harassment of
marine mammal species and stocks in
the vicinity of the action area. The
Notice of Proposed IHA included a
discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic noise on marine
mammals, which is not repeated here.
No instances of hearing threshold shifts,
injury, serious injury, or mortality are
expected as a result of WSDOT’s
activities given the strong likelihood
that marine mammals would avoid the
immediate vicinity of the pile driving
area.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammal
Habitat
The primary potential impacts to
marine mammals and other marine
species are associated with elevated
sound levels, but the project may also
result in additional effects to marine
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
mammal prey species and short-term
local water turbidity caused by in-water
construction due to pile removal and
pile driving. These potential effects are
discussed in detail in the Federal
Register notice for the proposed IHA
and are not repeated here.
Potential Impacts on Availability of
Affected Species or Stocks for Taking
for Subsistence Uses
No subsistence harvest of marine
mammals occurs in the action area.
Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an incidental take
authorization under Section 101(a)(5)(D)
of the MMPA, NMFS must prescribe,
where applicable, the permissible
methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting
the least practicable adverse impact on
such species or stock and its habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of
such species or stock for taking for
certain subsistence uses.
For WSDOT’s wingwalls replacement
work at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal,
NMFS is requiring WSDOT to
implement the following mitigation
measures to minimize the potential
impacts to marine mammals in the
project vicinity as a result of the inwater construction activities.
Since the measured source levels (at
10 and 16 m) of the vibratory hammer
involved in pile removal and pile
driving are below NMFS’ current
thresholds for Level A takes, i.e., below
180 dB (rms) re 1 mPa, no exclusion
zone will be established, and there will
be no required shutdown measures
except when take of SRKWs approaches
the authorized limit (see below).
Instead, WSDOT is required to establish
and monitor the 120 dB (rms) re 1 mPa
zone of influence (ZOI, see below
Monitoring and Reporting section).
One significant mitigation measure for
WSDOT’s pile removal and pile driving
activities is ramping up, or soft start, of
vibratory pile hammers. The purpose of
this procedure is to prevent the startling
behavior of marine mammals in the
vicinity of the construction activity from
sudden loud noise.
Soft start requires contractors to
initiate the vibratory hammer at reduced
power for 15 seconds with a 1 minute
interval, and repeat such procedures for
an additional two times.
In addition, monitoring for marine
mammal presence will take place 30
minutes before, during and 30 minutes
after pile driving to document marine
mammal occurrence and responses
before, during and after the pile driving
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
and pile removal activities (see
Monitoring and Reporting section
below).
In addition, WSDOT will implement
shutdown measures whenever Southern
Resident killer whales (SRKWs) are
present in the vicinity of the project area
and take all practical steps to avoid
exposing SRKWs to sound levels that
result in harassment. If it is unknown
whether it is a SRKW or a transient
killer whale, it shall be assumed to be
a SRKW appropriate mitigation
measures shall be implemented.
Further, if the number of any allotted
marine mammal takes reaches the limit
under the IHA, WSDOT will implement
shutdown measures if such species/
stock of animal approaches the 120 dB
Level B harassment zone.
Finally, to avoid exceeding its SRKW
take limit, NMFS has required WSDOT
to not resume activities until any SRKW
(1) is observed to have left the Level B
harassment zone or (2) has not been
seen or otherwise detected within the
Level B harassment zone 30 minutes.
Mitigation Conclusions
Based on our evaluation of the
prescribed mitigation measures, NMFS
has determined the measures provide
the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammal
species or stocks and their habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar
significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
Monitoring Measures
Any ITA issued under Section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA is required to
prescribe, where applicable,
‘‘requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such
taking’’. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13)
state that requests for ITAs must include
the suggested means of accomplishing
the necessary monitoring and reporting
that will result in increased knowledge
of the species and of the level of taking
or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be
present in the action area.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(1) Protected Species Observers (PSOs)
WSDOT will employ qualified
protected species observers (PSOs) to
monitor the 120 dB re 1 mPa (rms) for
marine mammals. Qualifications for
marine mammal observers include:
• Visual acuity in both eyes
(correction is permissible) sufficient for
discernment of moving targets at the
water’s surface with ability to estimate
target size and distance. Use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
binoculars is necessary to correctly
identify the target.
• Advanced education (at least some
college level courses) in biological
science, wildlife management,
mammalogy or related fields (Bachelor’s
degree or higher is preferred), but not
required.
• Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals
(cetaceans and pinnipeds).
• Sufficient training, orientation or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations.
• Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
• Experience and ability to conduct
field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols (this
may include academic experience).
• Writing skills sufficient to prepare a
report of observations that would
include such information as the number
and type of marine mammals observed;
the behavior of marine mammals in the
project area during construction, dates
and times when observations were
conducted; dates and times when inwater construction activities were
conducted; and dates and times when
marine mammals were present at or
within the defined ZOI.
(2) Monitoring Protocols
PSOs will be present on site at all
times during pile removal and driving.
Marine mammal behavior, overall
numbers of individuals observed,
frequency of observation, and the time
corresponding to the daily tidal cycle
will be recorded.
The following protocols will be used
for marine mammal monitoring during
the Bremerton Ferry Terminal
construction work:
• A range finder or hand-held global
positioning system device will be used
to ensure that the 120 dB re 1 mPa (rms)
Level B behavioral harassment ZOI is
monitored.
• A 20-minute pre-construction
marine mammal monitoring period will
be required before the first pile driving
or pile removal of the day. A 30-minute
post-construction marine mammal
monitoring period will be required after
the last pile driving or pile removal of
the day. If the construction personnel
take a break between subsequent pile
driving or pile removal for more than 30
minutes, then additional preconstruction marine mammal
monitoring will be required before the
next start-up of pile driving or pile
removal.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36529
• If marine mammals are observed,
the following information will be
document:
D Species of observed marine
mammals;
D Number of observed marine
mammal individuals;
D Behavioral of observed marine
mammals;
D Location within the ZOI; and
D Animals’ reaction (if any) to piledriving activities.
• During vibratory pile removal and
driving, one land-based biologist will
monitor the area from the terminal work
site, and one boat with a qualified PSO
shall navigate the ZOI in a circular path.
All PSOs shall use binoculars to
conducting monitoring.
• In addition, WSDOT will contact
the Orca Network and/or Center for
Whale Research to determine the
location of the nearest marine mammal
sightings. Sightings are called or
emailed into the Orca Network and
immediately distributed to other
sighting networks including: The
Northwest Fisheries Science Center of
NOAA Fisheries, the Center for Whale
Research, Cascadia Research, the Whale
Museum Hotline, and the British
Columbia Sightings Network.
• Marine mammal occurrence
information collected by the Orca
Network also includes detection by the
following hydrophone systems: (1) The
SeaSound Remote Sensing Network, a
system of interconnected hydrophones
installed in the marine environment of
Haro Strait (west side of San Juan
Island) to study killer whale
communication, underwater noise,
bottomfish ecology, and local climatic
conditions, and (2) A hydrophone at the
Port Townsend Marine Science Center
that measures average underwater
sound levels and automatically detects
unusual sounds.
NMFS has determined that these
monitoring measures are adequate,
particularly as it relates to assessing the
level of taking or impacts to affected
species. The land-based PSO is expected
to be positioned in a location that will
maximize his/her ability to detect
marine mammals and will also be
required to utilize binoculars to improve
detection rates. In addition, the boatbased PSO will cruise within the 120 dB
ZOI, which is not a particularly large
zone, thereby allowing him/her to
conduct additional monitoring with
binoculars. With respect to prevent
takes of SRKW, NMFS considers
WSDOT’s visual and acoustic
monitoring is adequate because (1) killer
whales have large dorsal fins and can be
easily spotted from great distances; (2)
SRKWs typically move in groups which
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
36530
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
makes visual detection much easier; and
(3) resident killer whales are very vocal,
which makes them relatively easier for
acoustic detection.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Reporting Measures
WSDOT will provide NMFS with a
draft monitoring report within 90 days
of the conclusion of the construction
work. This report will detail the
monitoring protocol, summarize the
data recorded during monitoring, and
estimate the number of marine
mammals that may have been harassed.
If comments are received from the
NMFS Northwest Regional
Administrator or NMFS Office of
Protected Resources on the draft report,
a final report will be submitted to NMFS
within 30 days thereafter. If no
comments are received from NMFS, the
draft report will be considered to be the
final report.
Notification of Injured or Dead Marine
Mammals
In addition to the reporting measures
listed above, NMFS will require that
WSDOT notify NMFS’ Office of
Protected Resources and NMFS’
Stranding Network of sighting an
injured or dead marine mammal in the
vicinity of marine operations.
Depending on the circumstance of the
incident, WSDOT shall take one of the
following reporting protocols when an
injured or dead marine mammal is
discovered in the vicinity of the action
area.
(a) In the unanticipated event that the
construction activities clearly cause the
take of a marine mammal in a manner
prohibited by this Authorization, such
as an injury, serious injury or mortality
(e.g., ship-strike, gear interaction, and/or
entanglement), WSDOT shall
immediately cease all operations and
immediately report the incident to the
Supervisor of Incidental Take Program,
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,
and the Northwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators. The report must include
the following information:
(i) time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident;
(ii) description of the incident;
(iii) status of all sound source use in
the 24 hours preceding the incident;
(iv) environmental conditions (e.g.,
wind speed and direction, Beaufort sea
state, cloud cover, visibility, and water
depth);
(v) description of marine mammal
observations in the 24 hours preceding
the incident;
(vi) species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
(vii) the fate of the animal(s); and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
(viii) photographs or video footage of
the animal (if equipment is available).
Activities shall not resume until
NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take.
NMFS shall work with WSDOT to
determine what is necessary to
minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. WSDOT may not resume
their activities until notified by NMFS
via letter, email, or telephone.
(b) In the event that WSDOT discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the cause
of the injury or death is unknown and
the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less
than a moderate state of decomposition
as described in the next paragraph),
WSDOT will immediately report the
incident to the Supervisor of the
Incidental Take Program, Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, and the
Northwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators. The report must include
the same information identified above.
Activities may continue while NMFS
reviews the circumstances of the
incident. NMFS will work with WSDOT
to determine whether modifications in
the activities are appropriate.
(c) In the event that WSDOT discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the injury
or death is not associated with or related
to the activities authorized in the IHA
(e.g., previously wounded animal,
carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage),
WSDOT shall report the incident to the
Supervisor of the Incidental Take
Program, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, and the Northwest Regional
Stranding Coordinators, within 24 hours
of the discovery. WSDOT shall provide
photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to NMFS and
the Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
WSDOT can continue its operations
under such a case.
Estimated Take by Incidental
Harassment
As mentioned in the Federal Register
notice for the proposed IHA, a worstcase scenario for the Bremerton Ferry
Terminal project assumes that it may
take four days to remove the existing
piles and seven days to install the new
piles. The maximum total number of
hours of pile removal activity is about
28 hours, and pile-driving activity is
about 6.75 hours (averaging about 3.2
hours of active pile removal/driving for
each construction day).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Also, as described in the Federal
Register notice for the proposed IHA,
for non-impulse noise, NMFS uses 120
dB (rms) re 1 mPa as the threshold for
Level B behavioral harassment. The
distance to the 120 dB contour Level B
acoustical harassment threshold due to
vibratory pile driving for the Bremerton
ferry terminal project extends a
maximum of 4.7 km (2.9 miles) before
land is intersected. The ZOI would be
monitored during construction to
estimate actual harassment take of
marine mammals.
Airborne noises can affect pinnipeds,
especially resting seals hauled out on
rocks or sand spits. The airborne 90 dB
Level B threshold for hauled out harbor
seals was estimated at 37 m, and the
airborne 100 dB Level B threshold for
all other pinnipeds is estimated at 12 m.
The nearest known harbor seal
haulout site to the Bremerton ferry
terminal is 8.5 km north and west
(shoreline distance). The nearest
documented California and Steller sea
lion haulout sites to the Bremerton ferry
terminal are navigation buoys in Rich
Passage, approximately 9 and 10 km
east of the terminal. The Puget Sound
Naval Shipyard security barrier
California sea lion haulout is located
approximately 435 m SW of the ferry
terminal.
In-air noise from this project will not
reach any haulout sites, but harbor seals
swimming on the surface through the 37
m zone, and other pinnipeds swimming
on the surface through the 12 m zone
during vibratory pile removal or driving
may be temporarily disturbed.
Incidental take is estimated for each
species by estimating the likelihood of
a marine mammal being present within
a ZOI during active pile removal or
driving. Expected marine mammal
presence is determined by past
observations and general abundance
near the Bremerton Ferry Terminal
during the construction window.
Typically, potential take is estimated by
multiplying the area of the ZOI by the
local animal density. This provides an
estimate of the number of animals that
might occupy the ZOI at any given
moment. However, there are no density
estimates for any Puget Sound
population of marine mammal. As a
result, the take requests were estimated
using local marine mammal data sets
(e.g., Orca Network, state and federal
agencies), opinions from state and
federal agencies, and observations from
Navy biologists.
Based on the estimates, approximately
649 Pacific harbor seals, 1,584
California sea lions, 66 Steller sea lions,
28 killer whales (24 transient, 4
Southern Resident killer whales), 8 gray
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
36531
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
whales, and 8 humpback whales could
be exposed to received sound levels at
or above 120 dB re 1 mPa (rms) from the
proposed Bremerton Ferry Terminal
wingwalls replacement work. A
summary of the estimated takes is
presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED NUMBERS OF MARINE MAMMALS THAT MAY BE EXPOSED TO RECEIVED PILE DRIVING AND PILE
REMOVAL LEVELS ABOVE 120 DB RE 1 μPA (RMS)
Estimated
marine
mammal takes
Species
Pacific harbor seal ...................................................................................................................................................
California sea lion ....................................................................................................................................................
Steller sea lion .........................................................................................................................................................
Killer whale, transient ..............................................................................................................................................
Killer whale, Southern Resident ..............................................................................................................................
Gray whale ...............................................................................................................................................................
Humpback whale .....................................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The requested takes represent 4.4% of
the Inland Washington stock harbor
seals (estimated at 14,612), 0.53% of the
U.S. stock California sea lion (estimated
at 296,750), 0.11% of the eastern stock
Steller sea lion (estimated at 58,334),
6.8% of the West Coast transient killer
whale (estimated at 354), 5% of
Southern Resident killer whale
(estimated at 85), 0.03% of the Eastern
North Pacific stock gray whale
(estimated at 26,000), and 0.7% of the
Eastern North Pacific stock humpback
whale (estimated at 1,100), all of which
are small relative to their population or
stock size.
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers
Analyses and Determinations
As a preliminary matter, we typically
include our negligible impact and small
numbers analyses and determinations
under the same section heading of our
Federal Register Notices. Despite colocating these terms, we acknowledge
that negligible impact and small
numbers are distinct standards under
the MMPA and treat them as such. The
analyses presented below do not
conflate the two standards; instead, each
standard has been considered
independently and we have applied the
relevant factors to inform our negligible
impact and small numbers
determinations.
Pursuant to NMFS’ regulations
implementing the MMPA, an applicant
is required to estimate the number of
animals that will be ‘‘taken’’ by the
specified activities (i.e., takes by
harassment only, or takes by
harassment, injury, and/or death). This
estimate informs the analysis that NMFS
must perform to determine whether the
activity will have a ‘‘negligible impact’’
on the species or stock. Level B
(behavioral) harassment occurs at the
level of the individual(s) and does not
assume any resulting population-level
consequences, though there are known
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
avenues through which behavioral
disturbance of individuals can result in
population-level effects. A negligible
impact finding is based on the lack of
likely adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of Level B harassment takes alone is not
enough information on which to base an
impact determination.
In addition to considering estimates of
the number of marine mammals that
might be ‘‘taken’’ through behavioral
harassment, NMFS considers other
factors, such as the likely nature of any
responses (their intensity, duration,
etc.), the context of any responses
(critical reproductive time or location,
migration, etc.), as well as the number
and nature of estimated Level A takes,
the number of estimated mortalities, and
effects on habitat.
The WSDOT’s proposed Bremerton
Ferry Terminal construction project
would conduct vibratory pile removal
and pile driving to replace wingwall
structures. Elevated underwater noises
are expected to be generated as a result
of pile removal and pile driving
activities. However, noise levels from
the machinery and activities are not
expected to reach to the level that may
cause TTS, injury (PTS included), or
mortality to marine mammals.
Therefore, NMFS does not expect that
any animals would experience Level A
harassment or Level B harassment in the
form of TTS from being exposed to inwater pile driving and pile removal
associated with WSDOT construction
project.
Based on long-term marine mammal
monitoring and studies in the vicinity of
the proposed construction areas, it is
estimated that approximately 649
Pacific harbor seals, 1,584 California sea
lions, 66 Steller sea lions, 40 killer
whales (24 transient, 16 Southern
Resident killer whales), 8 gray whales,
and 8 humpback whales could be
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
649
1,584
66
24
4
8
8
Percentage
4.4
0.53
0.11
6.8
5
0.03
0.7
exposed to received noise levels above
120 dBrms re 1 mPa from the proposed
construction work at the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal. These numbers
represent approximately 0.03%–6.8% of
the stocks and populations of these
species could be affected by Level B
behavioral harassment. As mentioned
earlier in this document, the worst case
scenario for the proposed construction
work would only take a total of 34.75
hours (28 hours for pile removal and
6.75 hours for pile driving).
In addition, these low intensity,
localized, and short-term noise
exposures may cause brief startle
reactions or short-term behavioral
modification by the animals. These
reactions and behavioral changes are
expected to subside quickly when the
exposures cease. In addition, no
important feeding and/or reproductive
areas of marine mammals is known to
be near the proposed action area.
Therefore, the take resulting from the
proposed Bremerton Ferry Terminal
construction projects is not reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely
to, adversely affect the marine mammal
species or stocks through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
The maximum estimated 120 dB
isopleths from vibratory pile driving is
approximately 4.7 km from the pile
before being blocked by landmass.
The closest documented California
sea lion haulout site to the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal is the Puget Sound
Naval Shipyard security barrier, located
approximately 435 m SW of the ferry
terminal. The next closest documented
California sea lion haulout sites to the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal are
navigation buoys and net pens in Rich
Passage, approximately nine and ten km
east of the terminal, respectively.
However, it is estimated that airborne
noise from vibratory pile driving a 30in steel pile would fall below 90 dB and
100 dB re 1 20 mPa at 37 m and 12 m
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
36532
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 117 / Tuesday, June 18, 2013 / Notices
from the pile, respectively. No other
pinniped haulout site exists in the
vicinity of the proposed project area.
Therefore, pinnipeds hauled out at the
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard security
barrier will not be affected.
For the reasons discussed in this
document, NMFS has determined that
the impact of vibratory pile removal and
pile driving associated with wingwall
replacements at Bremerton Ferry
Terminal would result, at worst, in the
Level B harassment of small numbers of
six marine mammals that inhabit or visit
the area. While behavioral
modifications, including temporarily
vacating the area around the
construction site, may be made by these
species to avoid the resultant visual and
acoustic disturbance, the availability of
alternate areas within Washington
coastal waters and haul-out sites has led
NMFS to determine that this action will
have a negligible impact on these
species in the vicinity of the proposed
construction area.
In addition, no take by TTS, Level A
harassment or death is anticipated and
harassment takes should be at the
lowest level practicable due to
incorporation of the mitigation and
monitoring measures mentioned
previously in this document.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) and analyzed the
potential impacts to marine mammals
that would result from WSDOT’s
wingwalls replacement work at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal. A Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI) was
signed on June 10, 2013. A copy of the
EA and FONSI is available upon request
(see ADDRESSES).
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The humpback whale, Southern
Resident stock of killer whale, and the
eastern population of Steller sea lions,
are the only marine mammal species
currently listed under the ESA that
could occur in the vicinity of WSDOT’s
construction projects. NMFS’ Permits
and Conservation Division consulted
with NMFS’ Northwest Regional Office
Division of Protected Resources under
section 7 of the ESA on the issuance of
an IHA to WSDOT under section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for this
activity. A Biological Opinion was
issued on February 19, 2013, which
concludes that issuance of the IHA is
not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the ESA-listed marine
mammal species. NMFS will issue an
Incidental Take Statement under this
Biological Opinion which contains
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:52 Jun 17, 2013
Jkt 229001
reasonable and prudent measures with
implementing terms and conditions to
minimize the effects of take of listed
species.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to WSDOT
for the potential harassment of small
numbers of six marine mammal species
incidental to wingwalls replacement
construction activities at the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal in Washington State,
provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Dated: June 12, 2013.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–14494 Filed 6–17–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
[Docket No: CFPB–2013–0015]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (Bureau) is proposing
a new information collection, titled,
‘‘Policy to Encourage Trial Disclosure
Programs: Information Collection.’’
DATES: Written comments are
encouraged and must be received on or
before July 18, 2013 to be assured of
consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the title of the information
collection, OMB Control Number (see
below), and docket number (see above),
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(Attention: PRA Office), 1700 G Street
NW., Washington, DC 20552.
Please note that comments submitted
by fax or email and those submitted
after the comment period will not be
accepted. In general, all comments
received will be posted without change
to regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Sensitive personal information, such as
account numbers or social security
numbers, should not be included.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Documentation prepared in support of
this information collection request is
available at www.reginfo.gov. Requests
for additional information should be
directed to the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, (Attention: PRA
Office), 1700 G Street NW., Washington,
DC 20552, (202) 435–9575, or email:
CFPB_Public_PRA@cfpb.gov. Please do
not submit comments to this email box.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Policy to Encourage Trial
Disclosure Programs: Information
Collection.
OMB Control Number: 3170–XXXX.
Type of Review: New collection;
request for new OMB control number.
Affected Public: Private Sector
(Certain businesses offering consumer
financial services or products that meet
the definition of ‘‘covered person’’
under Section 1002(6) of the DoddFrank Act, as well as third-parties, such
as trade associations, that may
coordinate the submission of
information by covered persons).
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 10.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 100.
Abstract: In subsection 1032(e) of the
Dodd-Frank Act, 12 U.S.C. 5532(e),
Congress gave the Bureau authority to
provide certain legal protections to
companies to conduct trial disclosure
programs. This authority can be used to
help further the Bureau’s statutory
objective, stated in subsection
1021(b)(5) of the Act, to ‘‘facilitate
access and innovation’’ in the ‘‘markets
for consumer financial products and
services.’’
Request for Comments: The Bureau
issued a 60-day Federal Register notice
on December 17, 2012, 77 FR 74625.
Comments were solicited and continue
to be invited on: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Bureau, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Bureau’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and the
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36527-36532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14494]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC172
Taking of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities;
Construction at Bremerton Ferry Terminal
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental take authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)
regulations, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to take, by harassment, small
numbers of six species of marine mammals incidental to vibratory pile
driving and pile removal activities at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal in
Washington State between September 2013 and August 2014.
DATES: Effective September 1, 2013, through August 31, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Requests for information on the incidental take
authorization should be addressed to P. Michael Payne, Chief, Permits
and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910. A copy of the application containing a list of the references
used in this document, NMFS' Environmental Assessment (EA), Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI), and the IHA may be obtained by writing
to the address specified above or visiting the Internet at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental.htm#applications.
Documents cited in this notice may be viewed, by appointment,
during regular business hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shane Guan, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is
provided to the public for review.
An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103
as ``. . . an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot
be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by which citizens of the U.S. can apply for a one-year authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment,
provided that there is no potential for serious injury or mortality to
result from the activity. Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day
time limit for NMFS review of an application followed by a 30-day
public notice and comment period on any proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of
the comment period, NMFS must either issue or deny the authorization.
Summary of Request
On August 14, 2012, WSDOT submitted a request to NOAA requesting an
IHA for the possible harassment of small numbers of six marine mammal
species incidental to construction associated with the replacement of
wingwalls at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal in Washington State. On
December 4, 2012, WSDOT submitted a revised IHA application. The action
discussed in this document is based on WSDOT's December 4, 2012, IHA
application.
Description of the Specified Activity
Detailed description of the WSDOT's wingwalls replacement work at
the Bremerton Ferry Terminal is provided in the Federal Register notice
for the proposed IHA (78 FR 11844; February 20, 2013). Since that time,
no changes have been made to the wingwalls replacement project at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal, except that WSDOT requested the incidental
take coverage to be extended from February 28, 2014, through August 31,
2014, in case the project may be postponed. Nevertheless, the amount of
activity and the duration of actual in-water construction has not
changed. The potential change in work season will not affect marine
mammal take estimates since the actual construction duration will not
change and the initial calculation relied on marine mammal presence in
the project area on annual basis.
The details of WSDOT's wingwalls replacement work at Bremerton
Ferry Terminal are provided in the Federal Register notice for the
proposed IHA (78 FR 11844; February 20, 2013). Please refer to that
Federal Register notice for the description of the specific activity.
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS' proposal to issue an IHA to WSDOT was published
in the Federal Register on February 20, 2013 (78 FR 11844). That notice
described, in detail, WSDOT's activity, the marine mammal species that
may be affected by the activity, and the anticipated effects on marine
mammals. During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS received
comments from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission). The Commission
recommends NMFS issue the IHA to WSDOT, but has asked NMFS to condition
the IHA in certain respects. Specific comments and responses are
provided below.
Comment 1: The Commission requests that NMFS justify its conclusion
that the taking will involve only a small number of southern resident
killer whales (SRKWs) and work with the Fish and Wildlife Service and
the Commission to develop a policy that sets forth the criteria and/or
thresholds for determining what constitutes ``small numbers'' and
``negligible impact'' for the purpose of authorizing incidental takes
of marine mammals
Response: As stated in the Federal Register for the proposed IHA,
WSDOT is required to implement shutdown measures if the combined Level
B takes of SRKWs reach to a total of 16 at the Bremerton Ferry
Terminal, which is equivalent to approximately 19% of the SRKW
population. Subsequently, NMFS
[[Page 36528]]
worked with WSDOT on a possible solution to further reduce takes of
SRKWs. WSDOT agreed that it will take all practical steps to avoid
exposing SRKWs to sound levels that may result in harassment by
implementing shutdown measures whenever a SRKW is sighted in the
vicinity of the project area. In the event a SRKW is not detected
before entering the zone of influence, NMFS has authorized the take of
no more than four SRKW, which represents 5% of the existing population.
As we have done in the past, NMFS will continue to collaborate with the
Commission and Fish and Wildlife Service on a variety of MMPA issues,
including small numbers and negligible impact, to strengthen our
collective understanding of how activities affect marine mammal species
and stocks.
Comment 2: The Commission requests NMFS require WSDOT to monitor
the Level B harassment zone at least 30 minutes before, during, and 30
minutes after the pile-removal and -driving activities to ensure that
those activities are not having an unintended effect on marine mammals
in or near the zone.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Commission and will require the
WSDOT to monitor the Level B harassment zone for 30 minutes before,
during, and 30 minutes after the pile driving and pile removal
activities.
Comment 3: The Commission requests NMFS specify in its
authorization that, after a delay, power down, or shutdown, the Ferries
Division would not resume activities until the marine mammal (1) is
observed to have left the Level B harassment zone or (2) has not been
seen or otherwise detected within the Level B harassment zone for 15
minutes for small odontocetes and 30 minutes for mysticetes and large
odontocetes, including killer whales.
Response: As described in detail in the Federal Register notice for
the proposed IHA, WSDOT's wingwalls replacement project at the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal will only use vibratory pile hammer for pile
driving. Marine mammals are not expected to be injured (Level A
harassment) by WSDOT's use of vibratory pile hammers, thereby obviating
the need for an exclusion zone for this activity. Nevertheless, for
initiation of pile driving and pile removal activities, WSDOT is
required to monitor the Level B harassment zone for 30 minutes before,
during, and 30 minutes after in-water construction, and to ramp up
vibratory hammer for pile removal and pile driving, which will
effectively reduce any startle behavior of marine mammals in the
vicinity at the commencement of the piling activity.
However, WSDOT is required to shutdown when a SRKW is sighted in
the vicinity of the project area, or the potential takes of any SRKW is
approaching the allotted take limit. Therefore, under such
circumstances, NMFS will require that WSDOT not resume activities until
the killer whale under the above condition (1) is observed to have left
the Level B harassment zone or (2) has not been seen or otherwise
detected within the Level B harassment zone 30 minutes after a
shutdown.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of the Specified Activity
The marine mammal species under NMFS jurisdiction most likely to
occur in the construction area include Pacific harbor seal (Phoca
vitulina richardsi), California sea lion (Zalophus californianus),
Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), killer whale (Orcinus orca),
gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus), and humpback whale (Megaptera
novaeangliae).
General information on the marine mammal species found in
California waters can be found in Caretta et al. (2011), which is
available at the following URL: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/pdfs/sars/po2011.pdf. Specific information concerning these species in the
vicinity of the action area is provided in the Federal Register notice
for the proposed IHA and in WSDOT's IHA application. Therefore, it is
not repeated here.
Potential Effects of the Specified Activity on Marine Mammals
The effects of underwater noise from in-water vibratory pile
driving and pile removal associated with the construction activities at
the Bremerton Ferry Terminal has the potential to result in behavioral
harassment of marine mammal species and stocks in the vicinity of the
action area. The Notice of Proposed IHA included a discussion of the
effects of anthropogenic noise on marine mammals, which is not repeated
here. No instances of hearing threshold shifts, injury, serious injury,
or mortality are expected as a result of WSDOT's activities given the
strong likelihood that marine mammals would avoid the immediate
vicinity of the pile driving area.
Potential Effects on Marine Mammal Habitat
The primary potential impacts to marine mammals and other marine
species are associated with elevated sound levels, but the project may
also result in additional effects to marine mammal prey species and
short-term local water turbidity caused by in-water construction due to
pile removal and pile driving. These potential effects are discussed in
detail in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA and are not
repeated here.
Potential Impacts on Availability of Affected Species or Stocks for
Taking for Subsistence Uses
No subsistence harvest of marine mammals occurs in the action area.
Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an incidental take authorization under Section
101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA, NMFS must prescribe, where applicable, the
permissible methods of taking pursuant to such activity, and other
means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on such species
or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries,
mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the
availability of such species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses.
For WSDOT's wingwalls replacement work at the Bremerton Ferry
Terminal, NMFS is requiring WSDOT to implement the following mitigation
measures to minimize the potential impacts to marine mammals in the
project vicinity as a result of the in-water construction activities.
Since the measured source levels (at 10 and 16 m) of the vibratory
hammer involved in pile removal and pile driving are below NMFS'
current thresholds for Level A takes, i.e., below 180 dB (rms) re 1
[mu]Pa, no exclusion zone will be established, and there will be no
required shutdown measures except when take of SRKWs approaches the
authorized limit (see below). Instead, WSDOT is required to establish
and monitor the 120 dB (rms) re 1 [mu]Pa zone of influence (ZOI, see
below Monitoring and Reporting section).
One significant mitigation measure for WSDOT's pile removal and
pile driving activities is ramping up, or soft start, of vibratory pile
hammers. The purpose of this procedure is to prevent the startling
behavior of marine mammals in the vicinity of the construction activity
from sudden loud noise.
Soft start requires contractors to initiate the vibratory hammer at
reduced power for 15 seconds with a 1 minute interval, and repeat such
procedures for an additional two times.
In addition, monitoring for marine mammal presence will take place
30 minutes before, during and 30 minutes after pile driving to document
marine mammal occurrence and responses before, during and after the
pile driving
[[Page 36529]]
and pile removal activities (see Monitoring and Reporting section
below).
In addition, WSDOT will implement shutdown measures whenever
Southern Resident killer whales (SRKWs) are present in the vicinity of
the project area and take all practical steps to avoid exposing SRKWs
to sound levels that result in harassment. If it is unknown whether it
is a SRKW or a transient killer whale, it shall be assumed to be a SRKW
appropriate mitigation measures shall be implemented.
Further, if the number of any allotted marine mammal takes reaches
the limit under the IHA, WSDOT will implement shutdown measures if such
species/stock of animal approaches the 120 dB Level B harassment zone.
Finally, to avoid exceeding its SRKW take limit, NMFS has required
WSDOT to not resume activities until any SRKW (1) is observed to have
left the Level B harassment zone or (2) has not been seen or otherwise
detected within the Level B harassment zone 30 minutes.
Mitigation Conclusions
Based on our evaluation of the prescribed mitigation measures, NMFS
has determined the measures provide the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their
habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and
areas of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
Monitoring Measures
Any ITA issued under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA is required
to prescribe, where applicable, ``requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking''. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) state that requests for ITAs must
include the suggested means of accomplishing the necessary monitoring
and reporting that will result in increased knowledge of the species
and of the level of taking or impacts on populations of marine mammals
that are expected to be present in the action area.
(1) Protected Species Observers (PSOs)
WSDOT will employ qualified protected species observers (PSOs) to
monitor the 120 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) for marine mammals. Qualifications
for marine mammal observers include:
Visual acuity in both eyes (correction is permissible)
sufficient for discernment of moving targets at the water's surface
with ability to estimate target size and distance. Use of binoculars is
necessary to correctly identify the target.
Advanced education (at least some college level courses)
in biological science, wildlife management, mammalogy or related fields
(Bachelor's degree or higher is preferred), but not required.
Experience or training in the field identification of
marine mammals (cetaceans and pinnipeds).
Sufficient training, orientation or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations.
Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary.
Experience and ability to conduct field observations and
collect data according to assigned protocols (this may include academic
experience).
Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of
observations that would include such information as the number and type
of marine mammals observed; the behavior of marine mammals in the
project area during construction, dates and times when observations
were conducted; dates and times when in-water construction activities
were conducted; and dates and times when marine mammals were present at
or within the defined ZOI.
(2) Monitoring Protocols
PSOs will be present on site at all times during pile removal and
driving. Marine mammal behavior, overall numbers of individuals
observed, frequency of observation, and the time corresponding to the
daily tidal cycle will be recorded.
The following protocols will be used for marine mammal monitoring
during the Bremerton Ferry Terminal construction work:
A range finder or hand-held global positioning system
device will be used to ensure that the 120 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) Level B
behavioral harassment ZOI is monitored.
A 20-minute pre-construction marine mammal monitoring
period will be required before the first pile driving or pile removal
of the day. A 30-minute post-construction marine mammal monitoring
period will be required after the last pile driving or pile removal of
the day. If the construction personnel take a break between subsequent
pile driving or pile removal for more than 30 minutes, then additional
pre-construction marine mammal monitoring will be required before the
next start-up of pile driving or pile removal.
If marine mammals are observed, the following information
will be document:
[ssquf] Species of observed marine mammals;
[ssquf] Number of observed marine mammal individuals;
[ssquf] Behavioral of observed marine mammals;
[ssquf] Location within the ZOI; and
[ssquf] Animals' reaction (if any) to pile-driving activities.
During vibratory pile removal and driving, one land-based
biologist will monitor the area from the terminal work site, and one
boat with a qualified PSO shall navigate the ZOI in a circular path.
All PSOs shall use binoculars to conducting monitoring.
In addition, WSDOT will contact the Orca Network and/or
Center for Whale Research to determine the location of the nearest
marine mammal sightings. Sightings are called or emailed into the Orca
Network and immediately distributed to other sighting networks
including: The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of NOAA Fisheries,
the Center for Whale Research, Cascadia Research, the Whale Museum
Hotline, and the British Columbia Sightings Network.
Marine mammal occurrence information collected by the Orca
Network also includes detection by the following hydrophone systems:
(1) The SeaSound Remote Sensing Network, a system of interconnected
hydrophones installed in the marine environment of Haro Strait (west
side of San Juan Island) to study killer whale communication,
underwater noise, bottomfish ecology, and local climatic conditions,
and (2) A hydrophone at the Port Townsend Marine Science Center that
measures average underwater sound levels and automatically detects
unusual sounds.
NMFS has determined that these monitoring measures are adequate,
particularly as it relates to assessing the level of taking or impacts
to affected species. The land-based PSO is expected to be positioned in
a location that will maximize his/her ability to detect marine mammals
and will also be required to utilize binoculars to improve detection
rates. In addition, the boat-based PSO will cruise within the 120 dB
ZOI, which is not a particularly large zone, thereby allowing him/her
to conduct additional monitoring with binoculars. With respect to
prevent takes of SRKW, NMFS considers WSDOT's visual and acoustic
monitoring is adequate because (1) killer whales have large dorsal fins
and can be easily spotted from great distances; (2) SRKWs typically
move in groups which
[[Page 36530]]
makes visual detection much easier; and (3) resident killer whales are
very vocal, which makes them relatively easier for acoustic detection.
Reporting Measures
WSDOT will provide NMFS with a draft monitoring report within 90
days of the conclusion of the construction work. This report will
detail the monitoring protocol, summarize the data recorded during
monitoring, and estimate the number of marine mammals that may have
been harassed.
If comments are received from the NMFS Northwest Regional
Administrator or NMFS Office of Protected Resources on the draft
report, a final report will be submitted to NMFS within 30 days
thereafter. If no comments are received from NMFS, the draft report
will be considered to be the final report.
Notification of Injured or Dead Marine Mammals
In addition to the reporting measures listed above, NMFS will
require that WSDOT notify NMFS' Office of Protected Resources and NMFS'
Stranding Network of sighting an injured or dead marine mammal in the
vicinity of marine operations. Depending on the circumstance of the
incident, WSDOT shall take one of the following reporting protocols
when an injured or dead marine mammal is discovered in the vicinity of
the action area.
(a) In the unanticipated event that the construction activities
clearly cause the take of a marine mammal in a manner prohibited by
this Authorization, such as an injury, serious injury or mortality
(e.g., ship-strike, gear interaction, and/or entanglement), WSDOT shall
immediately cease all operations and immediately report the incident to
the Supervisor of Incidental Take Program, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, and the Northwest
Regional Stranding Coordinators. The report must include the following
information:
(i) time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the incident;
(ii) description of the incident;
(iii) status of all sound source use in the 24 hours preceding the
incident;
(iv) environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction,
Beaufort sea state, cloud cover, visibility, and water depth);
(v) description of marine mammal observations in the 24 hours
preceding the incident;
(vi) species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
(vii) the fate of the animal(s); and
(viii) photographs or video footage of the animal (if equipment is
available).
Activities shall not resume until NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS shall work with WSDOT to
determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. WSDOT may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS via letter, email, or telephone.
(b) In the event that WSDOT discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the cause of the injury or
death is unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less than
a moderate state of decomposition as described in the next paragraph),
WSDOT will immediately report the incident to the Supervisor of the
Incidental Take Program, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, and the Northwest Regional Stranding
Coordinators. The report must include the same information identified
above. Activities may continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances of
the incident. NMFS will work with WSDOT to determine whether
modifications in the activities are appropriate.
(c) In the event that WSDOT discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the injury or death is not
associated with or related to the activities authorized in the IHA
(e.g., previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage), WSDOT shall report the incident to
the Supervisor of the Incidental Take Program, Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, and the Northwest
Regional Stranding Coordinators, within 24 hours of the discovery.
WSDOT shall provide photographs or video footage (if available) or
other documentation of the stranded animal sighting to NMFS and the
Marine Mammal Stranding Network. WSDOT can continue its operations
under such a case.
Estimated Take by Incidental Harassment
As mentioned in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA, a
worst-case scenario for the Bremerton Ferry Terminal project assumes
that it may take four days to remove the existing piles and seven days
to install the new piles. The maximum total number of hours of pile
removal activity is about 28 hours, and pile-driving activity is about
6.75 hours (averaging about 3.2 hours of active pile removal/driving
for each construction day).
Also, as described in the Federal Register notice for the proposed
IHA, for non-impulse noise, NMFS uses 120 dB (rms) re 1 [mu]Pa as the
threshold for Level B behavioral harassment. The distance to the 120 dB
contour Level B acoustical harassment threshold due to vibratory pile
driving for the Bremerton ferry terminal project extends a maximum of
4.7 km (2.9 miles) before land is intersected. The ZOI would be
monitored during construction to estimate actual harassment take of
marine mammals.
Airborne noises can affect pinnipeds, especially resting seals
hauled out on rocks or sand spits. The airborne 90 dB Level B threshold
for hauled out harbor seals was estimated at 37 m, and the airborne 100
dB Level B threshold for all other pinnipeds is estimated at 12 m.
The nearest known harbor seal haulout site to the Bremerton ferry
terminal is 8.5 km north and west (shoreline distance). The nearest
documented California and Steller sea lion haulout sites to the
Bremerton ferry terminal are navigation buoys in Rich Passage,
approximately 9 and 10 km east of the terminal. The Puget Sound Naval
Shipyard security barrier California sea lion haulout is located
approximately 435 m SW of the ferry terminal.
In-air noise from this project will not reach any haulout sites,
but harbor seals swimming on the surface through the 37 m zone, and
other pinnipeds swimming on the surface through the 12 m zone during
vibratory pile removal or driving may be temporarily disturbed.
Incidental take is estimated for each species by estimating the
likelihood of a marine mammal being present within a ZOI during active
pile removal or driving. Expected marine mammal presence is determined
by past observations and general abundance near the Bremerton Ferry
Terminal during the construction window. Typically, potential take is
estimated by multiplying the area of the ZOI by the local animal
density. This provides an estimate of the number of animals that might
occupy the ZOI at any given moment. However, there are no density
estimates for any Puget Sound population of marine mammal. As a result,
the take requests were estimated using local marine mammal data sets
(e.g., Orca Network, state and federal agencies), opinions from state
and federal agencies, and observations from Navy biologists.
Based on the estimates, approximately 649 Pacific harbor seals,
1,584 California sea lions, 66 Steller sea lions, 28 killer whales (24
transient, 4 Southern Resident killer whales), 8 gray
[[Page 36531]]
whales, and 8 humpback whales could be exposed to received sound levels
at or above 120 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) from the proposed Bremerton Ferry
Terminal wingwalls replacement work. A summary of the estimated takes
is presented in Table 3.
Table 3--Estimated Numbers of Marine Mammals That May Be Exposed to
Received Pile Driving and Pile Removal Levels Above 120 dB re 1 [mu]Pa
(rms)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
Species marine mammal Percentage
takes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific harbor seal..................... 649 4.4
California sea lion..................... 1,584 0.53
Steller sea lion........................ 66 0.11
Killer whale, transient................. 24 6.8
Killer whale, Southern Resident......... 4 5
Gray whale.............................. 8 0.03
Humpback whale.......................... 8 0.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The requested takes represent 4.4% of the Inland Washington stock
harbor seals (estimated at 14,612), 0.53% of the U.S. stock California
sea lion (estimated at 296,750), 0.11% of the eastern stock Steller sea
lion (estimated at 58,334), 6.8% of the West Coast transient killer
whale (estimated at 354), 5% of Southern Resident killer whale
(estimated at 85), 0.03% of the Eastern North Pacific stock gray whale
(estimated at 26,000), and 0.7% of the Eastern North Pacific stock
humpback whale (estimated at 1,100), all of which are small relative to
their population or stock size.
Negligible Impact and Small Numbers Analyses and Determinations
As a preliminary matter, we typically include our negligible impact
and small numbers analyses and determinations under the same section
heading of our Federal Register Notices. Despite co-locating these
terms, we acknowledge that negligible impact and small numbers are
distinct standards under the MMPA and treat them as such. The analyses
presented below do not conflate the two standards; instead, each
standard has been considered independently and we have applied the
relevant factors to inform our negligible impact and small numbers
determinations.
Pursuant to NMFS' regulations implementing the MMPA, an applicant
is required to estimate the number of animals that will be ``taken'' by
the specified activities (i.e., takes by harassment only, or takes by
harassment, injury, and/or death). This estimate informs the analysis
that NMFS must perform to determine whether the activity will have a
``negligible impact'' on the species or stock. Level B (behavioral)
harassment occurs at the level of the individual(s) and does not assume
any resulting population-level consequences, though there are known
avenues through which behavioral disturbance of individuals can result
in population-level effects. A negligible impact finding is based on
the lack of likely adverse effects on annual rates of recruitment or
survival (i.e., population-level effects). An estimate of the number of
Level B harassment takes alone is not enough information on which to
base an impact determination.
In addition to considering estimates of the number of marine
mammals that might be ``taken'' through behavioral harassment, NMFS
considers other factors, such as the likely nature of any responses
(their intensity, duration, etc.), the context of any responses
(critical reproductive time or location, migration, etc.), as well as
the number and nature of estimated Level A takes, the number of
estimated mortalities, and effects on habitat.
The WSDOT's proposed Bremerton Ferry Terminal construction project
would conduct vibratory pile removal and pile driving to replace
wingwall structures. Elevated underwater noises are expected to be
generated as a result of pile removal and pile driving activities.
However, noise levels from the machinery and activities are not
expected to reach to the level that may cause TTS, injury (PTS
included), or mortality to marine mammals. Therefore, NMFS does not
expect that any animals would experience Level A harassment or Level B
harassment in the form of TTS from being exposed to in-water pile
driving and pile removal associated with WSDOT construction project.
Based on long-term marine mammal monitoring and studies in the
vicinity of the proposed construction areas, it is estimated that
approximately 649 Pacific harbor seals, 1,584 California sea lions, 66
Steller sea lions, 40 killer whales (24 transient, 16 Southern Resident
killer whales), 8 gray whales, and 8 humpback whales could be exposed
to received noise levels above 120 dBrms re 1 [mu]Pa from
the proposed construction work at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal. These
numbers represent approximately 0.03%-6.8% of the stocks and
populations of these species could be affected by Level B behavioral
harassment. As mentioned earlier in this document, the worst case
scenario for the proposed construction work would only take a total of
34.75 hours (28 hours for pile removal and 6.75 hours for pile
driving).
In addition, these low intensity, localized, and short-term noise
exposures may cause brief startle reactions or short-term behavioral
modification by the animals. These reactions and behavioral changes are
expected to subside quickly when the exposures cease. In addition, no
important feeding and/or reproductive areas of marine mammals is known
to be near the proposed action area. Therefore, the take resulting from
the proposed Bremerton Ferry Terminal construction projects is not
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely
affect the marine mammal species or stocks through effects on annual
rates of recruitment or survival. The maximum estimated 120 dB
isopleths from vibratory pile driving is approximately 4.7 km from the
pile before being blocked by landmass.
The closest documented California sea lion haulout site to the
Bremerton Ferry Terminal is the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard security
barrier, located approximately 435 m SW of the ferry terminal. The next
closest documented California sea lion haulout sites to the Bremerton
Ferry Terminal are navigation buoys and net pens in Rich Passage,
approximately nine and ten km east of the terminal, respectively.
However, it is estimated that airborne noise from vibratory pile
driving a 30-in steel pile would fall below 90 dB and 100 dB re 1 20
[mu]Pa at 37 m and 12 m
[[Page 36532]]
from the pile, respectively. No other pinniped haulout site exists in
the vicinity of the proposed project area. Therefore, pinnipeds hauled
out at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard security barrier will not be
affected.
For the reasons discussed in this document, NMFS has determined
that the impact of vibratory pile removal and pile driving associated
with wingwall replacements at Bremerton Ferry Terminal would result, at
worst, in the Level B harassment of small numbers of six marine mammals
that inhabit or visit the area. While behavioral modifications,
including temporarily vacating the area around the construction site,
may be made by these species to avoid the resultant visual and acoustic
disturbance, the availability of alternate areas within Washington
coastal waters and haul-out sites has led NMFS to determine that this
action will have a negligible impact on these species in the vicinity
of the proposed construction area.
In addition, no take by TTS, Level A harassment or death is
anticipated and harassment takes should be at the lowest level
practicable due to incorporation of the mitigation and monitoring
measures mentioned previously in this document.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) and analyzed the
potential impacts to marine mammals that would result from WSDOT's
wingwalls replacement work at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal. A Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was signed on June 10, 2013. A copy of
the EA and FONSI is available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The humpback whale, Southern Resident stock of killer whale, and
the eastern population of Steller sea lions, are the only marine mammal
species currently listed under the ESA that could occur in the vicinity
of WSDOT's construction projects. NMFS' Permits and Conservation
Division consulted with NMFS' Northwest Regional Office Division of
Protected Resources under section 7 of the ESA on the issuance of an
IHA to WSDOT under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for this activity.
A Biological Opinion was issued on February 19, 2013, which concludes
that issuance of the IHA is not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of the ESA-listed marine mammal species. NMFS will issue an
Incidental Take Statement under this Biological Opinion which contains
reasonable and prudent measures with implementing terms and conditions
to minimize the effects of take of listed species.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to WSDOT for the potential harassment of
small numbers of six marine mammal species incidental to wingwalls
replacement construction activities at the Bremerton Ferry Terminal in
Washington State, provided the previously mentioned mitigation,
monitoring, and reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: June 12, 2013.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-14494 Filed 6-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P