North Carolina: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 35766-35769 [2013-13850]
Download as PDF
35766
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2012–0173; FRL–9823–1]
North Carolina: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate Final Rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: North Carolina has applied to
EPA for final authorization of changes to
its hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
needed to qualify for final authorization,
and is authorizing the State’s changes
through this immediate final rule. In the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register, EPA is also publishing
a separate notice that serves as the
proposal to authorize these changes.
EPA believes this action is not
controversial and does not expect
comments that oppose it. Unless EPA
receives written comments that oppose
this authorization during the comment
period, the decision to authorize North
Carolina’s changes to its hazardous
waste program will take effect. If EPA
receives comments that oppose this
action, EPA will publish a notice in the
Federal Register withdrawing today’s
immediate final rule before it takes
effect, and the separate notice published
in today’s ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of
this Federal Register will serve as the
proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on August 13, 2013
unless EPA receives adverse written
comment by July 15, 2013. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
immediate final rule in the Federal
Register and inform the public that this
authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
RCRA–2012–0173, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
• Fax: (404) 562–9964 (prior to faxing,
please notify the EPA contact listed below).
• Mail: Send written comments to
Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State
Programs Section, RCRA Programs and
Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your
comments to Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits
and State Programs Section, RCRA Programs
and Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Instructions: EPA must receive your
comments by July 15, 2013. Please refer
to Docket Number EPA–R04–RCRA–
2012–0173. Do not submit information
that you consider to be confidential
business information or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made publicly available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
You may view and copy North
Carolina’s application and associated
publicly available materials from 8:00
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the following
locations: EPA, Region 4, RCRA
Division, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960; telephone number: (404)
562–8500; and the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, 217 West Jones Street,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603;
telephone number: (929) 707–8219.
Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least a
week in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State
Programs Section, RCRA Programs and
Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303–8960; telephone number: (404)
562–8500; fax number: (404) 562–9964;
email address: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may
be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to EPA’s regulations in 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates
pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)
take effect in authorized States at the
same time that they take effect in
unauthorized States. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in North Carolina,
including the issuance of new permits
implementing those requirements, until
the State is granted authorization to do
so.
B. What decisions has EPA made in this
rule?
On June 8, 2009, North Carolina
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program that
correspond to certain Federal rules
promulgated between July 1, 2004, and
June 30, 2008 (also known as RCRA
Clusters XV through XVIII). EPA
concludes that North Carolina’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section
3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR
Part 271. Therefore, EPA grants North
Carolina final authorization to operate
its hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application, and as outlined below in
Section G of this notice.
North Carolina has responsibility for
permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders
(except in Indian Country) and for
carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its revised
program application, subject to the
limitations of HSWA, as discussed
above.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
C. What is the effect of this
authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that the
changes described in North Carolina’s
authorization application will become
part of the authorized State hazardous
waste program, and will therefore be
federally enforceable. North Carolina
will continue to have primary
enforcement authority and
responsibility for its State hazardous
waste program. EPA retains its
authorities under RCRA sections 3007,
3008, 3013, and 7003, including its
authority to:
• Conduct inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements,
including authorized State program
requirements, and suspend or revoke
permits; and
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the State
regulations for which North Carolina is
being authorized by today’s action are
already effective and enforceable
requirements under State law, and are
not changed by today’s action.
D. Why wasn’t there a Proposed Rule
before today’s rule?
Along with this immediate final rule,
EPA is publishing a separate notice in
the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register that serves as the
proposal to authorize these State
program changes. EPA did not publish
a proposed rule before today because
EPA views this as a routine program
change and does not expect comments
that oppose this approval. EPA is
providing an opportunity for public
comment now, as described in Section
E of this notice.
E. What happens if EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose
this authorization, EPA will withdraw
today’s immediate final rule by
publishing a document in the Federal
Register before the rule becomes
effective. EPA will base any further
decision on the authorization of the
State program changes on the proposed
rule mentioned in the previous section,
after considering all comments received
during the comment period, and will
address all such comments in a later
final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment on these State
program changes. If you want to
comment on this authorization, you
must do so at this time.
If EPA receives comments that oppose
only the authorization of a particular
change to the State hazardous waste
program, EPA will withdraw that part of
today’s immediate final rule but the
authorization of the program changes
that the comments do not oppose will
become effective on the date specified
above. The Federal Register withdrawal
document will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective, and
which part is being withdrawn.
F. What has North Carolina previously
been authorized for?
North Carolina initially received final
authorization on December 14, 1984,
effective December 31, 1984 (49 FR
48694), to implement a hazardous waste
management program. EPA granted
authorization for changes to North
Carolina’s program on the following
dates: March 25, 1986, effective April 8,
1986 (51 FR 10211); August 5, 1988,
effective October 4, 1988 (53 FR 1988);
February 9, 1989, effective April 10,
1989 (54 FR 6290); September 22, 1989,
effective November 21, 1989 (54 FR
38993); January 18, 1991, effective
35767
March 19, 1991 (56 FR 1929); April 10,
1991, effective June 9, 1991 (56 FR
14474); July 19, 1991, effective
September 17, 1991 (56 FR 33206);
April 27, 1992, effective June 26, 1992
(57 FR 15254); December 12, 1992,
effective February 16, 1993 (57 FR
59825); January 27, 1994, effective
March 28, 1994 (59 FR 3792); April 4,
1994, effective June 3, 1994 (59 FR
15633); June 23, 1994, effective August
22, 1994 (59 FR 32378); November 10,
1994, effective January 9, 1995 (59 FR
56000); September 27, 1995, effective
November 27, 1995 (60 FR 49800); April
25, 1996, effective June 24, 1996 (61 FR
18284); October 23, 1998, effective
December 22, 1998 (63 FR 56834);
August 25, 1999, effective October 25,
1999 (64 FR 46298); February 28, 2002,
effective April 29, 2002 (67 FR 9219);
December 14, 2004, effective February
14, 2005 (69 FR 74444); March 23, 2005,
effective May 23, 2005 (70 FR 14556);
and February 7, 2011, effective April 8,
2011 (76 FR 6561).
G. What changes is EPA authorizing
with this action?
On June 8, 2009, North Carolina
submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking
authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. EPA
now makes an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of written comments
that oppose this action, that North
Carolina’s hazardous waste program
revisions are equivalent to, consistent
with, and no less stringent than the
Federal program, and therefore satisfy
all of the requirements necessary to
qualify for final authorization.
Therefore, EPA grants North Carolina
final authorization for the following
program changes:
Federal Register date and page
Analogous state authority 1
208—Methods Innovation Rule and SW–
846 Final Update IIIB & Correction.
70 FR 34538 06/14/05
70 FR 44150 08/01/05 .................
209—Universal Waste Rule: Specific Provisions for Mercury Containing Equipment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Description of Federal requirement
70 FR 45508 08/05/05 .................
211—Revision of Wastewater Treatment
Exemptions for Hazardous Waste Mixtures (‘‘Headworks Exemptions’’).
212—NESHAP: Final Standards for Hazardous Waste Combusters.
70 FR 57769 10/04/05 .................
15A NCAC 13A .0101(e); 15A NCAC 13A .0103(c); 15A NCAC
13A .0106(a) and (c)–(f); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(k), (o), (v)–
(w) and (aa); 15A NCAC 13A .0110(j), (n), (s)–(u); 15A
NCAC 13A .0111(d) and (g); 15A NCAC 13A .0112(c) and
(e); 15A NCAC 13A .0113(b) and (i); and 15A NCAC 13A
.0118(b) and (e)–(g).
15A NCAC 13A .0102(b); 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a); 15A NCAC
13A .0109(b); 15A NCAC 13A .0110(a); 15A NCAC 13A
.0112(a); 15A NCAC 13A .0113(a); and 15A NCAC 13A
.0119(a)–(c).
15A NCAC 13A .0106(a).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
70 FR 59402 10/12/05 .................
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
15A NCAC 13A .0101(e); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(q); 15A NCAC
13A .0110(o); 15A NCAC 13A .0111(d); and 15A NCAC 13A
.0113(a)–(b), (f)–(g), (i) and (k).
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
35768
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register date and page
Analogous state authority 1
213—Burden Reduction Initiative ...............
71 FR 16862 04/04/06 .................
214—Hazardous Waste and Used Oil;
Corrections to Errors in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
71 FR 40254 07/14/06 .................
216—Exclusion of Oil Bearing Secondary
Materials Processed in a Gasification
System to Produce Synthesis Gas.
217—NESHAP: Final Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase I
Final Replacement Standards and
Phase II) Amendments.
218—F019 Exemption for Wastewater
Treatment Sludges from Auto Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating Processes.
73 FR 57 01/02/08 .......................
15A NCAC 13A .0102(b); 15A NCAC 13A .0103(c); 15A NCAC
13A .0106(a); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(c), (e)–(k), (m)–(o), (q),
(s)–(t), (w) and (y); 15A NCAC 13A .0110(b), (d)–(n), (r), (t)
and (v); 15A NCAC 13A .0111(d); 15A NCAC 13A .0112(a);
and 15A NCAC 13A .0113(b) and (g).
15A NCAC 13A .0102(b); 15A NCAC 13A .0103(c); 15A NCAC
13A .0106(a) and (c)–(f); 15A NCAC 13A .0107(c), (e) and
(g)–(h); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(b)–(c), (g)–(o), (q), (s)–(y) and
(aa); 15A NCAC 13A .0110(a)–(b), (d), (f)–(n), (q)–(v) and
(x); 15A NCAC 13A .0111(b)–(d) and (f)–(g); 15A NCAC 13A
.0112(a) and (c)–(e); 15A NCAC 13A .0113(a)–(b), (f)–(g)
and (j); 15A NCAC 13A .0118(a)–(b) and (e)–(h); and 15A
NCAC 13A .0119(a)–(c).
15A NCAC 13A .0102(b) and 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a).
73 FR 18970 04/08/08 .................
15A NCAC 13A .0109(q) and 15A NCAC 13A .0111(d).
73 FR 31756 06/04/08 .................
15A NCAC 13A .0106(d).
1 The North Carolina provisions are from the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Rules, 15A NCAC 13A, effective as of August 1,
2008.
H. Where are the revised state rules
different from the Federal rules?
There are no State requirements in
this program revision considered to be
more stringent or broader in scope than
the Federal requirements.
I. Who handles permits after the
authorization takes effect?
North Carolina will issue permits for
all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the
permits it issues. EPA will continue to
administer any RCRA hazardous waste
permits or portions of permits which
EPA issued prior to the effective date of
this authorization until they expire or
are terminated. EPA will not issue any
more permits or new portions of permits
for the provisions listed in the Table
above after the effective date of this
authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which North Carolina
is not authorized.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
J. How does today’s action affect Indian
country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in North
Carolina?
North Carolina is not authorized to
carry out its hazardous waste program
in Indian Country within the State,
which includes the Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians. EPA will continue to
implement and administer the RCRA
program in these lands.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
K. What is codification and is EPA
codifying North Carolina’s hazardous
waste program as authorized in this
rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. EPA is not codifying
the authorization of North Carolina’s
changes at this time. However, EPA
reserves the amendment of 40 CFR part
272, subpart II, for the authorization of
North Carolina’s program changes at a
later date.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
has exempted this action from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and
therefore this action is not subject to
review by OMB. This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of
RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For
the same reason, this action also does
not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a
State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective August 13, 2013,
unless objections to this authorization
are received.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013–13850 Filed 6–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 221
[Docket No. MARAD–2013–0021]
RIN 2133–AB81
Retrospective Review Under E.O.
13563: Regulated Transactions
Involving Documented Vessels and
Other Maritime Interests
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review,’’ the Maritime
Administration (MarAd) is evaluating
the continued accuracy of its rules and
determining whether they effectively
address current issues and provide the
regulated public with necessary
guidance. As part of this review, MarAd
has decided to issue this final rule to
correct numerous citations in
accordance with the codification of Title
46 of the United States Code, update
relevant agency contacts, update
citations, and revise portions of the text.
This rulemaking will have no
substantive effect on the regulated
public.
DATES:
This rule is effective July 15,
2013.
You
may contact T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Attorney-Advisor, Office of Chief
Counsel, at (202) 366–9373. You may
send mail to Mr. Hudson at Office of
Chief Counsel, MAR–222, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. You may send electronic mail to
Mitch.Hudson@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On January 18, 2011, President
Obama issued Executive Order 13563,
which outlined a plan to improve
regulation and regulatory review (76 FR
3821, 1/21/11). Executive Order 13563
reaffirms and builds upon governing
principles of contemporary regulatory
review, including Executive Order
12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ (58 FR 51735, 10/4/1993), by
requiring Federal agencies to design
cost-effective, evidence-based
regulations that are compatible with
economic growth, job creation, and
competitiveness. The President’s plan
recognizes that these principles should
not only guide the Federal government’s
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
35769
approach to new regulations, but to
existing ones as well. To that end,
Executive Order 13563 requires agencies
to promote retrospective analysis of
rules that may be outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome.
Accordingly, the Maritime
Administration identified its regulations
governing transactions involving
documented vessels and other maritime
interests for improvement consistent
with the President’s Order. The
regulations were deemed to provide outof-date information and citations. By
updating agency regulations, this
rulemaking will make the regulatory
program more effective and less
burdensome on the public.
As authorized by Subtitle III of 46
U.S.C. Chapters 301 and 313, and
Subtitle V of 46 U.S.C. Chapter 561, and
delegated under 49 CFR 1.93, MarAd
may approve transactions involving the
transfer of interest in or control of
Documented Vessels owned by Citizens
of the United States to Noncitizens or
approve a Documented Vessel to
registry or operation under the authority
of a foreign country or for scrapping in
a foreign country. In addition, under
Part 221, MarAd may assess civil
penalties arising under commercial
instruments and maritime liens in time
of war or national emergency. Part 221
is now being updated to include
technical changes such as MarAd’s
address at 1200 New Jersey Avenue and
to include corrections to statutory
references, some of which were made
obsolete as the result of the codification
of the Appendix to Title 46 of the
United States Code.
Rulemaking Analysis and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) and DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures
Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), supplemented by E.O.
13563 (76 FR 3821, January 18, 2011)
and DOT policies and procedures,
MarAd must determine whether a
regulatory action is ‘‘significant,’’ and
therefore subject to Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’)
review and the requirements of the E.O.
The Order defines ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one likely to result
in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect in a material
way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities; (2) Create
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 115 (Friday, June 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35766-35769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13850]
[[Page 35766]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R04-RCRA-2012-0173; FRL-9823-1]
North Carolina: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: North Carolina has applied to EPA for final authorization of
changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that these changes satisfy
all requirements needed to qualify for final authorization, and is
authorizing the State's changes through this immediate final rule. In
the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, EPA is also
publishing a separate notice that serves as the proposal to authorize
these changes. EPA believes this action is not controversial and does
not expect comments that oppose it. Unless EPA receives written
comments that oppose this authorization during the comment period, the
decision to authorize North Carolina's changes to its hazardous waste
program will take effect. If EPA receives comments that oppose this
action, EPA will publish a notice in the Federal Register withdrawing
today's immediate final rule before it takes effect, and the separate
notice published in today's ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal
Register will serve as the proposal to authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on August 13,
2013 unless EPA receives adverse written comment by July 15, 2013. If
EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
immediate final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
this authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
RCRA-2012-0173, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov:
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Email: gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
Fax: (404) 562-9964 (prior to faxing, please notify the
EPA contact listed below).
Mail: Send written comments to Gwendolyn Gleaton,
Permits and State Programs Section, RCRA Programs and Materials
Management Branch, RCRA Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta,
Georgia 30303-8960.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to
Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State Programs Section, RCRA Programs
and Materials Management Branch, RCRA Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
Instructions: EPA must receive your comments by July 15, 2013.
Please refer to Docket Number EPA-R04-RCRA-2012-0173. Do not submit
information that you consider to be confidential business information
or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made publicly available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
You may view and copy North Carolina's application and associated
publicly available materials from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the
following locations: EPA, Region 4, RCRA Division, Atlanta Federal
Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; telephone
number: (404) 562-8500; and the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, 217 West Jones Street, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27603; telephone number: (929) 707-8219. Interested
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment
with the office at least a week in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gwendolyn Gleaton, Permits and State
Programs Section, RCRA Programs and Materials Management Branch, RCRA
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta Federal Center,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; telephone number:
(404) 562-8500; fax number: (404) 562-9964; email address:
gleaton.gwen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
State programs may be necessary when Federal or State statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, States must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized States at the
same time that they take effect in unauthorized States. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and prohibitions in North Carolina,
including the issuance of new permits implementing those requirements,
until the State is granted authorization to do so.
B. What decisions has EPA made in this rule?
On June 8, 2009, North Carolina submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking authorization of changes to its hazardous
waste program that correspond to certain Federal rules promulgated
between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2008 (also known as RCRA Clusters XV
through XVIII). EPA concludes that North Carolina's application to
revise its authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section 3006(b),
42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR Part 271. Therefore, EPA grants North
Carolina final authorization to operate its hazardous waste program
with the changes described in the authorization application, and as
outlined below in Section G of this notice.
North Carolina has responsibility for permitting treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities within its borders (except in Indian
Country) and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program described
in its revised program application, subject to the limitations of HSWA,
as discussed above.
[[Page 35767]]
C. What is the effect of this authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that the changes described in North
Carolina's authorization application will become part of the authorized
State hazardous waste program, and will therefore be federally
enforceable. North Carolina will continue to have primary enforcement
authority and responsibility for its State hazardous waste program. EPA
retains its authorities under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
including its authority to:
Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements, including authorized State
program requirements, and suspend or revoke permits; and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the State regulations for which North
Carolina is being authorized by today's action are already effective
and enforceable requirements under State law, and are not changed by
today's action.
D. Why wasn't there a Proposed Rule before today's rule?
Along with this immediate final rule, EPA is publishing a separate
notice in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register
that serves as the proposal to authorize these State program changes.
EPA did not publish a proposed rule before today because EPA views this
as a routine program change and does not expect comments that oppose
this approval. EPA is providing an opportunity for public comment now,
as described in Section E of this notice.
E. What happens if EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, EPA will
withdraw today's immediate final rule by publishing a document in the
Federal Register before the rule becomes effective. EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of the State program changes on
the proposed rule mentioned in the previous section, after considering
all comments received during the comment period, and will address all
such comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment on these State program changes. If you want to
comment on this authorization, you must do so at this time.
If EPA receives comments that oppose only the authorization of a
particular change to the State hazardous waste program, EPA will
withdraw that part of today's immediate final rule but the
authorization of the program changes that the comments do not oppose
will become effective on the date specified above. The Federal Register
withdrawal document will specify which part of the authorization will
become effective, and which part is being withdrawn.
F. What has North Carolina previously been authorized for?
North Carolina initially received final authorization on December
14, 1984, effective December 31, 1984 (49 FR 48694), to implement a
hazardous waste management program. EPA granted authorization for
changes to North Carolina's program on the following dates: March 25,
1986, effective April 8, 1986 (51 FR 10211); August 5, 1988, effective
October 4, 1988 (53 FR 1988); February 9, 1989, effective April 10,
1989 (54 FR 6290); September 22, 1989, effective November 21, 1989 (54
FR 38993); January 18, 1991, effective March 19, 1991 (56 FR 1929);
April 10, 1991, effective June 9, 1991 (56 FR 14474); July 19, 1991,
effective September 17, 1991 (56 FR 33206); April 27, 1992, effective
June 26, 1992 (57 FR 15254); December 12, 1992, effective February 16,
1993 (57 FR 59825); January 27, 1994, effective March 28, 1994 (59 FR
3792); April 4, 1994, effective June 3, 1994 (59 FR 15633); June 23,
1994, effective August 22, 1994 (59 FR 32378); November 10, 1994,
effective January 9, 1995 (59 FR 56000); September 27, 1995, effective
November 27, 1995 (60 FR 49800); April 25, 1996, effective June 24,
1996 (61 FR 18284); October 23, 1998, effective December 22, 1998 (63
FR 56834); August 25, 1999, effective October 25, 1999 (64 FR 46298);
February 28, 2002, effective April 29, 2002 (67 FR 9219); December 14,
2004, effective February 14, 2005 (69 FR 74444); March 23, 2005,
effective May 23, 2005 (70 FR 14556); and February 7, 2011, effective
April 8, 2011 (76 FR 6561).
G. What changes is EPA authorizing with this action?
On June 8, 2009, North Carolina submitted a final complete program
revision application, seeking authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. EPA now makes an immediate final
decision, subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this
action, that North Carolina's hazardous waste program revisions are
equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal
program, and therefore satisfy all of the requirements necessary to
qualify for final authorization. Therefore, EPA grants North Carolina
final authorization for the following program changes:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register date and
Description of Federal requirement page Analogous state authority \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
208--Methods Innovation Rule and SW-846 70 FR 34538 06/14/05 15A NCAC 13A .0101(e); 15A NCAC 13A
Final Update IIIB & Correction. 70 FR 44150 08/01/05....... .0103(c); 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a) and (c)-
(f); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(k), (o), (v)-(w)
and (aa); 15A NCAC 13A .0110(j), (n),
(s)-(u); 15A NCAC 13A .0111(d) and (g);
15A NCAC 13A .0112(c) and (e); 15A NCAC
13A .0113(b) and (i); and 15A NCAC 13A
.0118(b) and (e)-(g).
209--Universal Waste Rule: Specific 70 FR 45508 08/05/05....... 15A NCAC 13A .0102(b); 15A NCAC 13A
Provisions for Mercury Containing .0106(a); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(b); 15A
Equipment. NCAC 13A .0110(a); 15A NCAC 13A
.0112(a); 15A NCAC 13A .0113(a); and 15A
NCAC 13A .0119(a)-(c).
211--Revision of Wastewater Treatment 70 FR 57769 10/04/05....... 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a).
Exemptions for Hazardous Waste Mixtures
(``Headworks Exemptions'').
212--NESHAP: Final Standards for 70 FR 59402 10/12/05....... 15A NCAC 13A .0101(e); 15A NCAC 13A
Hazardous Waste Combusters. .0109(q); 15A NCAC 13A .0110(o); 15A
NCAC 13A .0111(d); and 15A NCAC 13A
.0113(a)-(b), (f)-(g), (i) and (k).
[[Page 35768]]
213--Burden Reduction Initiative........ 71 FR 16862 04/04/06....... 15A NCAC 13A .0102(b); 15A NCAC 13A
.0103(c); 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a); 15A
NCAC 13A .0109(c), (e)-(k), (m)-(o),
(q), (s)-(t), (w) and (y); 15A NCAC 13A
.0110(b), (d)-(n), (r), (t) and (v); 15A
NCAC 13A .0111(d); 15A NCAC 13A
.0112(a); and 15A NCAC 13A .0113(b) and
(g).
214--Hazardous Waste and Used Oil; 71 FR 40254 07/14/06....... 15A NCAC 13A .0102(b); 15A NCAC 13A
Corrections to Errors in the Code of .0103(c); 15A NCAC 13A .0106(a) and (c)-
Federal Regulations. (f); 15A NCAC 13A .0107(c), (e) and (g)-
(h); 15A NCAC 13A .0109(b)-(c), (g)-(o),
(q), (s)-(y) and (aa); 15A NCAC 13A
.0110(a)-(b), (d), (f)-(n), (q)-(v) and
(x); 15A NCAC 13A .0111(b)-(d) and (f)-
(g); 15A NCAC 13A .0112(a) and (c)-(e);
15A NCAC 13A .0113(a)-(b), (f)-(g) and
(j); 15A NCAC 13A .0118(a)-(b) and (e)-
(h); and 15A NCAC 13A .0119(a)-(c).
216--Exclusion of Oil Bearing Secondary 73 FR 57 01/02/08.......... 15A NCAC 13A .0102(b) and 15A NCAC 13A
Materials Processed in a Gasification .0106(a).
System to Produce Synthesis Gas.
217--NESHAP: Final Standards for 73 FR 18970 04/08/08....... 15A NCAC 13A .0109(q) and 15A NCAC 13A
Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase I .0111(d).
Final Replacement Standards and Phase
II) Amendments.
218--F019 Exemption for Wastewater 73 FR 31756 06/04/08....... 15A NCAC 13A .0106(d).
Treatment Sludges from Auto
Manufacturing Zinc Phosphating
Processes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The North Carolina provisions are from the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Rules, 15A NCAC 13A,
effective as of August 1, 2008.
H. Where are the revised state rules different from the Federal rules?
There are no State requirements in this program revision considered
to be more stringent or broader in scope than the Federal requirements.
I. Who handles permits after the authorization takes effect?
North Carolina will issue permits for all the provisions for which
it is authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will
continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of
permits which EPA issued prior to the effective date of this
authorization until they expire or are terminated. EPA will not issue
any more permits or new portions of permits for the provisions listed
in the Table above after the effective date of this authorization. EPA
will continue to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for
which North Carolina is not authorized.
J. How does today's action affect Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
North Carolina?
North Carolina is not authorized to carry out its hazardous waste
program in Indian Country within the State, which includes the Eastern
Band of Cherokee Indians. EPA will continue to implement and administer
the RCRA program in these lands.
K. What is codification and is EPA codifying North Carolina's hazardous
waste program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. EPA is not
codifying the authorization of North Carolina's changes at this time.
However, EPA reserves the amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart II, for
the authorization of North Carolina's program changes at a later date.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. This
action authorizes State requirements for the purpose of RCRA 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action
authorizes pre-existing requirements under State law and does not
impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State
law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same reason, this
action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities
of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as part of the State RCRA
hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a State authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another
[[Page 35769]]
standard that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective August 13, 2013, unless objections to this
authorization are received.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of
sections 2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013-13850 Filed 6-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P