Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 35749-35752 [2013-13294]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
35749
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
(4) Remove the HPC stage 6 disk within 50
additional CIS, if the baffle plate feature is
found cracked or missing material.
(g) Mandatory Removal From Service of
Affected HPC Stage 6 Disks
14 CFR Part 39
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
At next HPC module exposure, but not to
exceed 6,800 CSN on the HPC stage 6 disk,
remove the HPC stage 6 disk, P/N 382–100–
505–0, from the engine.
[Docket No. FAA–2012–1221; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–151–AD; Amendment
39–17474; AD 2013–11–14]
(h) Installation Prohibition
RIN 2120–AA64
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install any HPC stage 6 disk, P/N 382–100–
505–0, into any HPC module.
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
(i) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, HPC module
exposure is defined as disassembly of the
compressor to where the HPC rotor assembly
is removed and accessible.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2013–12–02 Engine Alliance: Amendment
39–17479; Docket No. FAA–2012–1329;
Directorate Identifier 2012–NE–46–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 19, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Engine Alliance
GP7270 and GP7277 turbofan engines with a
high-pressure compressor (HPC) stage 6 disk,
part number (P/N) 382–100–505–0, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by damage to the
HPC stage 7–9 spool caused by failure of the
baffle plate feature on affected HPC stage 6
disks. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the HPC stage 7–9 spool,
uncontained engine failure, and damage to
the airplane.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(f) Borescope Inspections
(1) For HPC stage 6 disks with fewer than
1,000 cycles- since- new (CSN) on the
effective date of this AD, initially borescope
inspect the baffle plate feature on the disk
(360 degrees) before accumulating 1,500
CSN.
(2) For HPC stage 6 disks with 1,000 CSN
or more on the effective date of this AD,
initially borescope inspect the baffle plate
feature on the disk (360 degrees) within the
next 500 cycles-in-service (CIS).
(3) Thereafter, repetitively borescope
inspect the baffle plate feature on the disk
(360 degrees) within every 500 CIS.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make
your request.
(k) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Martin Adler, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone: 781–238–7157; fax: 781–238–
7199; email: martin.adler@faa.gov.
(2) Engine Alliance Service Bulletin Nos.
EAGP7–72–236, EAGP7–72–237, and
EAGP7–72–240, pertain to the subject of this
AD.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Engine Alliance, 411 Silver
Lane, East Hartford, CT 06118, phone: 800–
565–0140; Web site:
https://www.engineallianceportal.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
June 7, 2013.
Robert J. Ganley,
Acting Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–14040 Filed 6–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777–200
and –300 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of hydraulic fluid
contamination (including contamination
caused by hydraulic fluid in its liquid,
vapor, and/or solid (coked) form) found
in the strut forward dry bay. This AD
requires repetitive general visual
inspections of the strut forward dry bay
for the presence of hydraulic fluid, and
related investigative and corrective
actions (including checking drain lines
for blockage due to hydraulic fluid
coking, and cleaning or replacing drain
lines to allow drainage) if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
hydraulic fluid contamination of the
strut forward dry bay, which could
result in hydrogen embrittlement of the
titanium forward engine mount
bulkhead fittings, and consequent
inability of the fittings to carry engine
loads, resulting in engine separation.
Hydraulic embrittlement also could
cause a through-crack formation across
the fittings through which an engine fire
could breach into the strut, resulting in
an uncontained strut fire.
DATES: This AD is effective July 19,
2013.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of July 19, 2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P. O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1;
fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
35750
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6501; fax:
425–917–6590; email:
kevin.nguyen@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on December 4, 2012 (77 FR
71731). That NPRM proposed to require
repetitive general visual inspections of
the strut forward dry bay for the
presence of hydraulic fluid, and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the proposal (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012) and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Concurrence With NPRM (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012)
Boeing concurred with the content of
the NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4,
2012).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Request for Delegation of Repair
Method Approval to Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA)
All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd., (ANA)
requested that we delegate the approval
for a repair method to the Boeing ODA
in order to minimize the downtime of
the airplane. ANA noted that paragraph
(h)(2) of the NPRM (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012) requires repair in
accordance with a method approved by
the Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
while the service information states to
contact Boeing for repairs.
We agree that approval of the repairs
can be delegated to the Boeing ODA for
this AD. As stated in the NPRM (77 FR
71731, December 4, 2012), paragraph
(i)(3) of the NPRM already specifies that
an alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by
the Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA
that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, to make those findings. However,
we have revised paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD to reference paragraph (i) of this AD
for repair approvals.
Request for Information
Mark Sokolow requested that we
provide information on which airplanes
the hydraulic fluid contamination
occurred, and on which flights. The
commenter quoted an Open
Government Directive issued by the
Office of Management and Budget on
December 8, 2009, (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m1006.pdf), which presented a 60-day
timetable to ‘‘respect the presumption of
openness by publishing information
online.’’ The author of that directive
reminded agencies that government has
defined guidelines as to the objectivity
of information, which focuses on
whether the ‘‘disseminated information
is being presented in an accurate, clear,
complete and unbiased manner. This
involves whether the information is
being presented within a proper context.
(Guidelines, 2001, p. 8459).’’
We infer that the commenter is
requesting information regarding
specific airplanes that originally
exhibited the unsafe condition. Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–
54–0028, dated May 25, 2012, which is
referenced in the NPRM (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012), identifies Model 777
airplanes that have accumulated
approximately 9,900 to 29,000 flight
cycles and 13,000 to 33,300 flight hours,
as the affected airplanes. However,
individual operator data might be
considered proprietary; therefore, we do
not publish individual operator
information of this type in ADs. No
change has been made to this AD in this
regard.
Request for Identification of Repairs
Mark Sokolow also requested that we
delineate mechanical repairs that can be
completed to stop the hydraulic fluid
contamination.
We note that, at this time, a
terminating action is not available. The
manufacturer is currently working on a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
terminating action; however, the
required inspections and any necessary
cleaning or drain line replacement
adequately addresses the unsafe
condition. If a terminating action
becomes available, we might consider
further rulemaking at that time. No
change has been made to the AD in this
regard.
Clarification of Terminology
We have determined that an
explanation of hydraulic fluid
contamination is needed for
clarification purposes in this AD.
Hydraulic fluid contamination includes,
but is not limited to, contamination
caused by hydraulic fluid in its liquid,
vapor, and/or solid (coked) form.
Hydraulic fluid in any of these forms
can be a contaminant to the structure
and its coating (primer, paint, leveling
compound, sealant, etc.) in the strut
forward dry bay. Boeing has confirmed
that ‘‘hydraulic fluid contamination’’
used in the service information is
understood to be contamination caused
by hydraulic fluid in its liquid, vapor,
and/or solid (coked) form. We have
added this clarification to the Summary
section of the AD preamble and to
paragraphs (e) and (g) of this AD.
Clarification of Related Investigative
and Corrective Actions
We have included the parenthetical
phrase, ‘‘including checking drain lines
for blockage due to hydraulic fluid
coking, and cleaning or replacing drain
lines to allow drainage’’ to clarify the
related investigative and corrective
actions specified in paragraph (g) of this
AD. Hydraulic fluid can enter the dry
bay through the condensate drain line
which connects to the system
disconnect box drain lines. The system
disconnect box drain hose can clog due
to hydraulic fluid coking in the drain
lines, which allows hydraulic fluid to
back up into the strut forward dry bay
through the condensate drain line.
Although the NPRM (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012) describes these
actions, we want to emphasize the
importance of these actions by
including them in the final rule.
Correction to Paragraph (c) of This AD
We have corrected the series
designation of the engine to Pratt &
Whitney ‘‘PW4000’’ series engines in
paragraph (c) of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
35751
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
and minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (77 FR
71731, December 4, 2012) for correcting
the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012).
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 55
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
5 work-hours × $85 per hour
= $425 per inspection cycle.
$0
$425 per inspection cycle ......
$23,375 per inspection cycle.
Action
Repetitive general visual inspections.
We estimate the following costs to do
any actions that would be required
based on the results of the inspection.
We have no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these
actions.
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Cost per
product
Action
Labor cost
Detailed inspection .......................................................
Check drain lines (including cleaning or replacing) .....
Detailed inspection and high frequency eddy current
inspection.
Clean and restore sealant, primer and leveling compound.
8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 ...........................
5 work-hours × $85 per hour = $425 ...........................
8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 ...........................
$0
0
0
$680
425
680
8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 ...........................
0
680
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide a cost
estimate for the on-condition repair
specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
Parts cost
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
Regulatory Findings
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2013–11–14 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–17474; Docket No.
FAA–2012–1221; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–151–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 19, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 777–200 and –300 series airplanes;
certificated in any category; equipped with
Pratt & Whitney PW4000 series engines; as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 777–54–0028, dated May 25,
2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America
Code 54, Nacelles/pylons.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
35752
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 115 / Friday, June 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
hydraulic fluid contamination (including
contamination caused by hydraulic fluid in
its liquid, vapor, and/or solid (coked) form)
found in the strut forward dry bay. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct
hydraulic fluid contamination of the strut
forward dry bay, which could result in
hydrogen embrittlement of the titanium
forward engine mount bulkhead fittings, and
consequent inability of the fittings to carry
engine loads, resulting in engine loss.
Hydraulic embrittlement also could cause a
through-crack formation across the fittings
through which an engine fire could breach
into the strut, resulting in an uncontained
strut fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Except as provided by paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD, at the times specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–0028,
dated May 25, 2012: Do a general visual
inspection for hydraulic fluid contamination
(including contamination caused by
hydraulic fluid in its liquid, vapor, and/or
solid (coked) form) of the interior of the strut
forward dry bay, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions
(including checking drain lines for blockage
due to hydraulic fluid coking, and cleaning
or replacing drain lines to allow drainage) if
necessary, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–
0028, dated May 25, 2012, except as required
by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Repeat the
inspection thereafter at the times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–
0028, dated May 25, 2012. Except as required
by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD, do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions at the times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–
0028, dated May 25, 2012.
(h) Exceptions to the Service Information
(1) Where the Compliance time column of
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Service Bulletin 777–54–0028, dated May 25,
2012, refers to the compliance time ‘‘after the
original issue date of this service bulletin,’’
this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777–54–0028, dated May 25, 2012,
specifies to contact Boeing for repair: Except
as required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD, at
the applicable times specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777–54–0028,
dated May 25, 2012, repair, using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(3) Where paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:51 Jun 13, 2013
Jkt 229001
777–54–0028, dated May 25, 2012, specifies
a compliance time of ‘‘within 25 flight-cycles
or 10 days, whichever occurs first,’’ this AD
requires compliance within 25 flight cycles
or 10 days after the most recent inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
whichever occurs first.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the
Related Information section of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Kevin Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone: 425–917–6501; fax: 425–917–6590;
email: kevin.nguyen@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777–54–0028, dated May 25, 2012.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 24,
2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–13294 Filed 6–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0458; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NE–19–AD; Amendment
39–17480; AD 2013–12–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Turbofan
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
(RRD) BR700–725A1–12 turbofan
engines with fuel pump tube part
number FW64852 installed. This AD
requires removal of the affected fuel
pump tube and its replacement with a
part eligible for installation. This AD
was prompted by the discovery that
cracks have occurred in the affected fuel
pump tube between the fuel metering
unit and the main fuel pump. We are
issuing this AD to prevent loss of fuel
supply to the engine, which could result
in in-flight engine shutdown of one or
more engines, loss of thrust control and
damage to the airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective June
14, 2013.
We must receive comments on this
AD by July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
E:\FR\FM\14JNR1.SGM
14JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 115 (Friday, June 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35749-35752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13294]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-1221; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-151-AD;
Amendment 39-17474; AD 2013-11-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of hydraulic fluid contamination (including
contamination caused by hydraulic fluid in its liquid, vapor, and/or
solid (coked) form) found in the strut forward dry bay. This AD
requires repetitive general visual inspections of the strut forward dry
bay for the presence of hydraulic fluid, and related investigative and
corrective actions (including checking drain lines for blockage due to
hydraulic fluid coking, and cleaning or replacing drain lines to allow
drainage) if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
hydraulic fluid contamination of the strut forward dry bay, which could
result in hydrogen embrittlement of the titanium forward engine mount
bulkhead fittings, and consequent inability of the fittings to carry
engine loads, resulting in engine separation. Hydraulic embrittlement
also could cause a through-crack formation across the fittings through
which an engine fire could breach into the strut, resulting in an
uncontained strut fire.
DATES: This AD is effective July 19, 2013.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of July 19,
2013.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.
O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
[[Page 35750]]
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6501; fax: 425-917-6590; email: kevin.nguyen@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 4, 2012 (77 FR
71731). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive general visual
inspections of the strut forward dry bay for the presence of hydraulic
fluid, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Concurrence With NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012)
Boeing concurred with the content of the NPRM (77 FR 71731,
December 4, 2012).
Request for Delegation of Repair Method Approval to Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA)
All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd., (ANA) requested that we delegate the
approval for a repair method to the Boeing ODA in order to minimize the
downtime of the airplane. ANA noted that paragraph (h)(2) of the NPRM
(77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012) requires repair in accordance with a
method approved by the Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, while the
service information states to contact Boeing for repairs.
We agree that approval of the repairs can be delegated to the
Boeing ODA for this AD. As stated in the NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4,
2012), paragraph (i)(3) of the NPRM already specifies that an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes ODA that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, to make those findings. However, we have revised
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD to reference paragraph (i) of this AD for
repair approvals.
Request for Information
Mark Sokolow requested that we provide information on which
airplanes the hydraulic fluid contamination occurred, and on which
flights. The commenter quoted an Open Government Directive issued by
the Office of Management and Budget on December 8, 2009, (https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf), which presented a 60-day timetable to ``respect the
presumption of openness by publishing information online.'' The author
of that directive reminded agencies that government has defined
guidelines as to the objectivity of information, which focuses on
whether the ``disseminated information is being presented in an
accurate, clear, complete and unbiased manner. This involves whether
the information is being presented within a proper context.
(Guidelines, 2001, p. 8459).''
We infer that the commenter is requesting information regarding
specific airplanes that originally exhibited the unsafe condition.
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May 25,
2012, which is referenced in the NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012),
identifies Model 777 airplanes that have accumulated approximately
9,900 to 29,000 flight cycles and 13,000 to 33,300 flight hours, as the
affected airplanes. However, individual operator data might be
considered proprietary; therefore, we do not publish individual
operator information of this type in ADs. No change has been made to
this AD in this regard.
Request for Identification of Repairs
Mark Sokolow also requested that we delineate mechanical repairs
that can be completed to stop the hydraulic fluid contamination.
We note that, at this time, a terminating action is not available.
The manufacturer is currently working on a terminating action; however,
the required inspections and any necessary cleaning or drain line
replacement adequately addresses the unsafe condition. If a terminating
action becomes available, we might consider further rulemaking at that
time. No change has been made to the AD in this regard.
Clarification of Terminology
We have determined that an explanation of hydraulic fluid
contamination is needed for clarification purposes in this AD.
Hydraulic fluid contamination includes, but is not limited to,
contamination caused by hydraulic fluid in its liquid, vapor, and/or
solid (coked) form. Hydraulic fluid in any of these forms can be a
contaminant to the structure and its coating (primer, paint, leveling
compound, sealant, etc.) in the strut forward dry bay. Boeing has
confirmed that ``hydraulic fluid contamination'' used in the service
information is understood to be contamination caused by hydraulic fluid
in its liquid, vapor, and/or solid (coked) form. We have added this
clarification to the Summary section of the AD preamble and to
paragraphs (e) and (g) of this AD.
Clarification of Related Investigative and Corrective Actions
We have included the parenthetical phrase, ``including checking
drain lines for blockage due to hydraulic fluid coking, and cleaning or
replacing drain lines to allow drainage'' to clarify the related
investigative and corrective actions specified in paragraph (g) of this
AD. Hydraulic fluid can enter the dry bay through the condensate drain
line which connects to the system disconnect box drain lines. The
system disconnect box drain hose can clog due to hydraulic fluid coking
in the drain lines, which allows hydraulic fluid to back up into the
strut forward dry bay through the condensate drain line. Although the
NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012) describes these actions, we want
to emphasize the importance of these actions by including them in the
final rule.
Correction to Paragraph (c) of This AD
We have corrected the series designation of the engine to Pratt &
Whitney ``PW4000'' series engines in paragraph (c) of this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously
[[Page 35751]]
and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor
changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 71731, December 4, 2012).
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 55 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive general visual 5 work-hours x $85 $0 $425 per inspection $23,375 per
inspections. per hour = $425 cycle. inspection cycle.
per inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any actions that would be
required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that might need these actions.
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detailed inspection........................... 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $680
$680.
Check drain lines (including cleaning or 5 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 425
replacing). $425.
Detailed inspection and high frequency eddy 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 680
current inspection. $680.
Clean and restore sealant, primer and leveling 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = 0 680
compound. $680.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition repair specified in this AD.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2013-11-14 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17474; Docket No. FAA-
2012-1221; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-151-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective July 19, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200 and -300
series airplanes; certificated in any category; equipped with Pratt
& Whitney PW4000 series engines; as identified in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May 25, 2012.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/pylons.
[[Page 35752]]
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of hydraulic fluid contamination
(including contamination caused by hydraulic fluid in its liquid,
vapor, and/or solid (coked) form) found in the strut forward dry
bay. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct hydraulic fluid
contamination of the strut forward dry bay, which could result in
hydrogen embrittlement of the titanium forward engine mount bulkhead
fittings, and consequent inability of the fittings to carry engine
loads, resulting in engine loss. Hydraulic embrittlement also could
cause a through-crack formation across the fittings through which an
engine fire could breach into the strut, resulting in an uncontained
strut fire.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection
Except as provided by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, at the times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May 25, 2012: Do a
general visual inspection for hydraulic fluid contamination
(including contamination caused by hydraulic fluid in its liquid,
vapor, and/or solid (coked) form) of the interior of the strut
forward dry bay, and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions (including checking drain lines for blockage due
to hydraulic fluid coking, and cleaning or replacing drain lines to
allow drainage) if necessary, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-
0028, dated May 25, 2012, except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May 25, 2012. Except as required by
paragraph (h)(3) of this AD, do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions at the times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-
0028, dated May 25, 2012.
(h) Exceptions to the Service Information
(1) Where the Compliance time column of paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May
25, 2012, refers to the compliance time ``after the original issue
date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within
the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028,
dated May 25, 2012, specifies to contact Boeing for repair: Except
as required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD, at the applicable times
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May 25, 2012, repair,
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(3) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated May 25, 2012,
specifies a compliance time of ``within 25 flight-cycles or 10 days,
whichever occurs first,'' this AD requires compliance within 25
flight cycles or 10 days after the most recent inspection required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Kevin Nguyen,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6501; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
kevin.nguyen@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0028, dated
May 25, 2012.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 24, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-13294 Filed 6-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P