Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus, 35088-35090 [2013-13777]
Download as PDF
35088
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Notices
Participation’’ heading below. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading for
further information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to Room W12–
140, DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. If you want
acknowledgement that we received your
comments, please include a selfaddressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register published on
December 29, 2010 (73 FR 82132) or you
may visit https://edocket/access.gpo.gov/
2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr.
Luke W. Loy, Vehicle and Roadside
Operations Division, Office of Bus and
Truck Standards and Operations, MC–
PSV, (202) 366–0676, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b)(1), FMCSA may renew an
exemption from the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations for a two-year
period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ FCSG has requested a
two-year extension for the exemption
from 49 CFR 393.120 to allow motor
carriers to comply with the pre-January
1, 2004 cargo securement regulations
(then at 49 CFR 393.100(c)) for the
transportation of groups of metal coils
with eyes crosswise. The procedures for
requesting an exemption (including
renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part 381.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Basis for Renewing Exemption
FCSG applied for an exemption from
49 CFR 393.120 in 2010 to allow motor
carriers to comply with the pre-January
1, 2004 cargo securement regulations for
the transportation of groups of metal
coils with eyes crosswise. On April 14,
2011, FMCSA published a notice of
final disposition in the Federal Register
granting the exemption (76 FR 20867).
The renewal outlined in this notice
extends the exemption through April
13, 2015, and requests public comment.
FMCSA is not aware of any evidence
showing that compliance with the preJanuary 1, 2004 cargo securement
regulations for the transportation of
groups of metal coils with eyes
crosswise, in accordance with the
conditions of the original exemption,
has resulted in any degradation in
safety. The Agency believes that
extending the exemption for a period of
two years will likely achieve a level of
safety that is equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety achieved
without the exemption because the
metal coils are grouped and secured
together in the longitudinal direction,
i.e., ‘‘unitized,’’ with the cargo
securement system meeting all of the
aggregate working load limit
requirements of 49 CFR 393.106(d).
The exemption is renewed subject to
the following requirements, provided
motor carriers using the exemption
continue to meet the aggregate working
load limits of 49 CFR 393.106(d).
Coils with eyes crosswise: If coils are
loaded to contact each other in the
longitudinal direction, and relative
motion between coils, and between coils
and the vehicle, is prevented by
tiedown assemblies and timbers:
(1) Only the foremost and rearmost
coils must be secured with timbers
having a nominal cross section of 4 x 4
inches or more and a length which is at
least 75 percent of the width of the coil
or row of coils, tightly placed against
both the front and rear sides of the row
of coils and restrained to prevent
movement of the coils in the forward
and rearward directions; and
(2) The first and last coils in a row of
coils must be secured with a tiedown
assembly restricting against forward and
rearward motion, respectively. Each
additional coil in the row of coils must
be secured to the trailer using a tiedown
assembly.
The exemption will be valid for two
years unless rescinded earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be
rescinded if: (1) Motor carriers and/or
commercial motor vehicles fail to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315.
Request for Comments
FMCSA requests comments from
parties with data concerning the safety
record of motor carriers transporting
groups of metal coils with eyes
crosswise, in accordance with the
conditions of the original exemption, by
July 11, 2013. The Agency will evaluate
any adverse evidence submitted and, if
safety is being compromised or if
continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315(b)(1), FMCSA will take
immediate steps to revoke the FCSG
exemption.
Issued on: June 3, 2013.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–13781 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2013–0015]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Diabetes Mellitus
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 20 individuals from
its rule prohibiting persons with
insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions will enable these
individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
June 11, 2013. The exemptions expire
on June 11, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64–224, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Notices
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT’s dockets by
the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or of the person signing
the comment, if submitted on behalf of
an association, business, labor union, or
other entity). You may review DOT’s
Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316).
Background
On April 4, 2013, FMCSA published
a notice of receipt of Federal diabetes
exemption applications from 20
individuals and requested comments
from the public (78 FR 20381). The
public comment period closed on May
6, 2013, and no comments were
received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of the 20 applicants and determined that
granting the exemptions to these
individuals would achieve a level of
safety equivalent to or greater than the
level that would be achieved by
complying with the current regulation
49 CFR 391.41(b)(3).
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving
Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current
requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated
that drivers with diabetes had a higher
rate of crash involvement than the
general population. The diabetes rule
provides that ‘‘A person is physically
qualified to drive a commercial motor
vehicle if that person has no established
medical history or clinical diagnosis of
diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control’’ (49 CFR
391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes
exemption program, based on the
Agency’s July 2000 study entitled ‘‘A
Report to Congress on the Feasibility of
a Program to Qualify Individuals with
Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus to
Operate in Interstate Commerce as
Directed by the Transportation Act for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
the 21st Century.’’ The report concluded
that a safe and practicable protocol to
allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The
September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441),
Federal Register notice in conjunction
with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR
67777), Federal Register notice provides
the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
These 20 applicants have had ITDM
over a range of 1 to 31 years. These
applicants report no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss
of consciousness or seizure, requiring
the assistance of another person, or
resulting in impaired cognitive function
that occurred without warning
symptoms, in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (2 or more) severe
hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5
years. In each case, an endocrinologist
verified that the driver has
demonstrated a willingness to properly
monitor and manage his/her diabetes
mellitus, received education related to
diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no
other disqualifying conditions,
including diabetes-related
complications. Each meets the vision
requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical
condition of each applicant were stated
and discussed in detail in the April 4,
2013, Federal Register notice and they
will not be repeated in this notice.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to
achieve an equivalent or greater level of
safety than would be achieved without
the exemption. The exemption allows
the applicants to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the
applicants’ ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists’
medical opinion related to the ability of
the driver to safely operate a CMV while
using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in
each case exempting these applicants
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35089
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the
exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document
and they include the following: (1) That
each individual submit a quarterly
monitoring checklist completed by the
treating endocrinologist as well as an
annual checklist with a comprehensive
medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business
days of occurrence, all episodes of
severe hypoglycemia, significant
complications, or inability to manage
diabetes; also, any involvement in an
accident or any other adverse event in
a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or
not it is related to an episode of
hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (4) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 20
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Donald J. Barber (FL), Gary M.
Bartley (LA), Ryan O. Carman (NC),
Robert G. Costa (NJ), Robert V. Gray
(LA), William J. Hannan, III (NJ), Ryan
R. Hetro (PA), Daniel A. Johns (PA),
Gary D. MacFarlane (ME), Ken R. Martin
(IL), David J. Mathews (MN), Terrance
M. Morrisette (MN), Shane J. Nesheim
(WI), Troy D. Ostrowski (MN), Daniel J.
Rau (ID), Robert E. Roach (MO), Jeremy
D. Schroeder (OH), Jerry G. Severson, Jr.
(IL), Kelly R. Troll (MN), Milfred R.
Unruh (MS) from the ITDM requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject to the
conditions listed under ‘‘Conditions and
Requirements’’ above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315 each exemption will be valid
for two years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if the following occurs: (1) The person
fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the 1/exemption; (2) the
exemption has resulted in a lower level
of safety than was maintained before it
was granted; or (3) continuation of the
exemption would not be consistent with
the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is
still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
35090
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 112 / Tuesday, June 11, 2013 / Notices
for a renewal under procedures in effect
at that time.
Issued on: May 30, 2013.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–13777 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
Agency Information Collection Activity
Under OMB Review; Reports, Forms
and Recordkeeping Requirements
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice
announces that the Information
Collection abstracted below has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. The nature of the information
collection is described as well as its
expected burden. The Federal Register
Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following
collection of information was published
on March 26, 2013. No comments were
received.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 11, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Krufeh, Maritime Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Telephone: 202–366–2318; or
email bill.krufehs@dot.gov. Copies of
this collection also can be obtained from
that office.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Maritime
Administration (MARAD)
Title: Application and Reporting
Requirements for Participation in the
Maritime Security Program.
OMB Control Number: 2133–0525.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Vessel Operators.
Form (s): MA–172.
Abstract: The Maritime Security Act
of 2003 provides for the enrollment of
qualified vessels in the Maritime
Security Program Fleet. Applications
and amendments are used to select
vessels for the fleet. Periodic reporting
is used to monitor adherence of
contractors to program parameters.
Expiration Date of Approval: Three
years from date of approval by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Annual Estimated Burden Hours: 210
hours.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:13 Jun 10, 2013
Jkt 229001
Addressee: Send comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention:
MARAD Desk Officer. Alternatively,
comments may be sent via email to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management
and Budget, at the following address:
oira.submissions@omb.eop.gov.
Comments Are Invited On: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways
to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
A comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication.
(Authority: 49 CFR 1.93)
Issued in Washington, DC on June 6, 2013.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–13844 Filed 6–10–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD–2013–0067]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel
LIVERNANO; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 11, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2013–0067.
Written comments may be submitted by
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Williams, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W23–453,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–0903, Email
Linda.Williams@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel LIVERNANO is:
INTENDED COMMERCIAL USE OF
VESSEL: ‘‘Occasional charter to special
group’’ GEOGRAPHIC REGION:
‘‘Florida’’.
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2013–0067 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR Part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR Part 388.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35088-35090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13777]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2013-0015]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 20 individuals from its
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective June 11, 2013. The exemptions
expire on June 11, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64-224, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 35089]]
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, or other
entity). You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316).
Background
On April 4, 2013, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from 20 individuals and requested
comments from the public (78 FR 20381). The public comment period
closed on May 6, 2013, and no comments were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 20 applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
These 20 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 31 years.
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case,
an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a
willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus,
received education related to diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying
conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the
vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the April 4, 2013, Federal Register
notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 20 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Donald J. Barber (FL), Gary M. Bartley (LA), Ryan O. Carman
(NC), Robert G. Costa (NJ), Robert V. Gray (LA), William J. Hannan, III
(NJ), Ryan R. Hetro (PA), Daniel A. Johns (PA), Gary D. MacFarlane
(ME), Ken R. Martin (IL), David J. Mathews (MN), Terrance M. Morrisette
(MN), Shane J. Nesheim (WI), Troy D. Ostrowski (MN), Daniel J. Rau
(ID), Robert E. Roach (MO), Jeremy D. Schroeder (OH), Jerry G.
Severson, Jr. (IL), Kelly R. Troll (MN), Milfred R. Unruh (MS) from the
ITDM requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject to the conditions
listed under ``Conditions and Requirements'' above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption will
be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption
will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply
with the terms and conditions of the 1/exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the
exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the
person may apply to FMCSA
[[Page 35090]]
for a renewal under procedures in effect at that time.
Issued on: May 30, 2013.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-13777 Filed 6-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P