Record of Decision for the F-15 Aircraft Conversion, 144th Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard, Fresno-Yosemite International Airport Final Environmental Impact Statement, 34656-34657 [2013-13710]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
34656
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 111 / Monday, June 10, 2013 / Notices
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors in the figure
number.
3. On page 77403, Section IV.C.8.b.
Advancements in Pay Band Which Must
be Approved by the Executive Director,
replace the section with:
Advancement to (1) pay bands outside
target pay bands or established position
management criteria, and (2) Pay Band
V of the S&E Professional Career Track
require approval by the Executive
Director without further delegation.
Details regarding the process for
nomination and consideration, format,
selection criteria, and other aspects of
this process will be addressed in the
standard operating procedures and/or
related instruction.
Reason for amendment: Removing the
requirement of Executive Director
approval for advancements in Pay
Bands IV and V of the Administrative
Specialist and Professional Career
Track, and Pay Band IV of the S&E
Career Track provides department heads
and senior leadership a path to advance
employees appropriately through the
pay pool panel process. Since the
determination of suitability for
advancement rests with the department
heads and other senior leadership
(including the pay pool managers), this
change simply places the authority to
approve such decisions with those
determining their appropriateness,
while retaining the Pay Pool Review
Authority’s full authority and
responsibility through the Pay Pool
Panel review process.
4. On page 77416, right hand column,
third block Part 351, subpart G, section
351.701—Assignment Involving
Displacement, replace paragraph (a)
with: Waive to allow minimally
successful or equivalent to be defined as
an employee who does not have a
current written notice of unacceptable
performance.
Reason for amendment: This change
is to prevent any possible categorization
of an employee as ‘‘unacceptable’’ in
terms of RIF, when that employee is
overcompensated as a result of coming
off of maintained pay and does not
receive any increase during the CCS
payout, but whose performance was
acceptable.
5. On page 77416, right hand column,
third block, last line: Replace ‘‘(e)(I)’’
with ‘‘(e)(1)’’.
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
6. On page 77418, left hand column,
second block: Replace ‘‘Chapter 52,
subpart I, section 5301—Pay Policy.
Waive in entirety.’’ with ‘‘Chapter 53,
subchapter I, section 5301—Pay Policy.
Waive in entirety.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
7. On page 77418, left hand column,
second block: Replace ‘‘Chapter 53,
subpart I, section 5303—Special Pay
Authority. Waive in entirety.’’ with
‘‘Chapter 53, subchapter I, section
5305—Special Pay Authority. Waive in
entirety.’’
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
8. On page 77419, left hand column,
third block: Replace ‘‘Chapter 55,
section 5455(d)—Hazardous Duty
Differential’’ with ‘‘Chapter 55, section
5545(d)—Hazardous Duty Differential’’
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
9. On page 77419, left hand column,
last block (continues on top of page
77420) Appendix B: Required Waivers
to Laws and Regulations chart replace
all of the material in that block with:
‘‘Chapter 75, sections 7501(1),
7511(a)(1)(A)(ii), and 7511(a)(1)(C)(ii);
Adverse Actions—Definitions. Waived
to the extent necessary to allow
extended probationary periods and to
permit termination during the extended
probationary period without using
adverse action procedures for those
individuals serving a probationary
period under an initial appointment
except for those with veterans’
preference.’’
Reason for amendment: This
amendment allows ONR to fully utilize
its flexibility of extended probationary
periods by permitting terminations
during these extended probationary
periods.
10. On page 77420, right hand
column, first block Appendix B:
Required Waivers to Laws and
Regulations chart, add this paragraph to
the block (currently blank): ‘‘Part 752,
sections, 752.201 and 752.401: Principal
statutory requirements and coverage.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow
extended probationary periods and to
permit termination during the extended
probationary period without using
adverse action procedures for those
individuals serving a probationary
period under an initial appointment
except those with veterans’ preference.’’
Reason for amendment: This
amendment allows ONR to fully utilize
its flexibility of extended probationary
periods by permitting terminations
during these extended probationary
periods.
11. On page 77420, right hand
column, second block: Delete the three
references to ‘‘Part 572’’ and replace
with ‘‘Part 752.’’
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12. On page 77420, right hand
column, second block: Replace ‘‘subpart
A’’ with ‘‘subpart D’’
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
13. On page 77420, right hand
column, third block, first paragraph,
delete ‘‘subpart B’’ and replace with
‘‘subpart D.’’
Reason for change: To correct
typographical errors.
14. On page 77429, title (header data):
Replace ‘‘ELEMENT 2. PROGRAM
EXECUTION AND LIASION’’ with
‘‘ELEMENT 2. PROGRAM EXECUTION
AND LIAISON.’’
Reason for change: To correct a typo.
Dated: June 5, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–13660 Filed 6–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Record of Decision for the F–15
Aircraft Conversion, 144th Fighter
Wing, California Air National Guard,
Fresno-Yosemite International Airport
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Notice of Availability (NOA) of
a Record of Decision (ROD).
ACTION:
On May 31, 2013, the United
States Air Force signed the ROD for the
F–15 Aircraft Conversion for the 144th
Fighter Wing, California Air National
Guard at Fresno-Yosemite International
Airport. The ROD states the Air Force
decision to implement the preferred
alternative analyzed in the
Environmental Impact Statement. The
Preferred Alternative will convert the
144 FW from 21 F–16 aircraft [18 F–16
Primary Assigned Aircraft (PAA) and 3
Back-up Inventory Aircraft (BAI)] to 21
F–15 aircraft (18 F–15 PAA and 3 F–15
BAI aircraft).
The decision was based on matters
discussed in the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), inputs from the
public and regulatory agencies, and
other relevant factors. The Final EIS was
made available to the public on March
1, 2013 through a NOA in the Federal
Register (Volume 78, Number 41, Page
13874) with a wait period that ended on
April 1, 2013. The ROD documents only
the decision of the Air Force with
respect to the proposed Air Force
actions analyzed in the Final EIS.
Authority: This NOA is published
pursuant to the regulations (40 CFR part
1506.6) implementing the provisions of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 111 / Monday, June 10, 2013 / Notices
the NEPA of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.) and the Air Force’s Environmental
Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) (32 CFR
parts 989.21(b) and 989.24(b)(7))
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Dogan, NGB/A7AM, 3501
Fetchet Avenue, Joint Base Andrews
Maryland, 20762–5157, (240) 612–8859.
Henry Williams, Jr.,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–13710 Filed 6–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
[Docket ID: USN–2013–0019]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of
Naval Research announces a proposed
public information collection and seeks
public comment on the provisions
thereof. Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by August 9, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria,
VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Jun 07, 2013
Jkt 229001
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Office of Naval
Research (ONR), ATTN: Will Brown,
Talent Manager, 875 North Randolph
Street, Arlington, VA 22203; or
will.brown@navy.mil.
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Office of Naval Research
(ONR) As One Survey; OMB Control
Number 0703–TBD.
Needs and Uses: The Chief of Naval
Research requires a method to better
understand how the total ONR
workforce is aligned and executes the
Command’s mission and strategic
initiatives. A survey will allow ONR to
collect data around the workforce’s
affinity within organizational groups,
commitment to strategic initiatives, and
understanding of how they work
together to achieve ONR’s mission.
Non-government personnel
(Contractors and Intergovernmental
Personnel Act (IPAs) staff) comprise
approximately half of ONR’s total
workforce population. As such,
surveying these non-government
personnel is required to capture a
holistic view of the total ONR workforce
and provide leaders with information to
make informed workforce decisions.
These ‘‘contingent’’ workforce members
perform a wide-range of functions and
are uniquely qualified individuals
brought in to support science and
technology management. These
individuals move across the
organization adapting quickly to new
issues and projects. They must
understand customers and the
interworking of ONR. They represent
the core of the cross-functional matrix
team concept and act as facilitators and
nodes among specialist and government
professionals. The combination of these
contingent workers and government
personnel comprise the ONR workforce
of the future. Truly understanding the
concerns and motivation of this segment
of the workforce will facilitate increased
creativity and discretionary effort across
the enterprise.
The information collected in the
survey will be used by ONR executives
to measure performance of the
organization, proactively inform
workforce engagement strategies for
greater resonance and impact, and
prepare for and implement
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
34657
organizational changes in the near- and
long-term.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households: Non-government
employees at ONR.
Annual Burden Hours: 139.
Number of Respondents: 555.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Average Burden per Response: 15
minutes.
Frequency: One Time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of Information Collection
ONR continues to experience
significant organizational and
operational changes. In order to
successfully and efficiently implement
these changes, the Chief of Naval
Research must understand information
related to the following: (1) The degree
of organizational coherence behind
executing strategic goals and priorities;
(2) data to measure performance of the
organization and proactively inform
workforce engagement strategies to
optimize resonance and impact; and (3)
how to prepare for and implement
organizational changes in the near- and
long-term. Currently, no databases or
surveys exist to provide information on
these areas as it relates to the total ONR
workforce. The ONR As One survey is
designed to provide the three
information needs described above by
surveying the ONR workforce. As an
online survey, it is the most cost- and
time-effective means for collecting the
required information. Because nongovernment employees comprise
approximately half of ONR’s total
workforce, it is imperative that these
workforce member types are included in
the survey population. The feedback
from these workforce member types is
critical to the goal of capturing an
accurate representation of the ONR total
workforce on the measures that are of
interest to the organization’s leadership:
The information collected in the survey
will be used to measure performance of
the organization, proactively inform
workforce engagement strategies for
greater resonance and impact, and
prepare for and implement
organizational changes in the near- and
long-term. All information will be
collected by an online survey and all
data will be reported in the aggregate.
Dated: June 4, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013–13635 Filed 6–7–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 111 (Monday, June 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34656-34657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13710]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Record of Decision for the F-15 Aircraft Conversion, 144th
Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard, Fresno-Yosemite
International Airport Final Environmental Impact Statement
ACTION: Notice of Availability (NOA) of a Record of Decision (ROD).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On May 31, 2013, the United States Air Force signed the ROD
for the F-15 Aircraft Conversion for the 144th Fighter Wing, California
Air National Guard at Fresno-Yosemite International Airport. The ROD
states the Air Force decision to implement the preferred alternative
analyzed in the Environmental Impact Statement. The Preferred
Alternative will convert the 144 FW from 21 F-16 aircraft [18 F-16
Primary Assigned Aircraft (PAA) and 3 Back-up Inventory Aircraft (BAI)]
to 21 F-15 aircraft (18 F-15 PAA and 3 F-15 BAI aircraft).
The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), inputs from the public and
regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made
available to the public on March 1, 2013 through a NOA in the Federal
Register (Volume 78, Number 41, Page 13874) with a wait period that
ended on April 1, 2013. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air
Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the
Final EIS. Authority: This NOA is published pursuant to the regulations
(40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of
[[Page 34657]]
the NEPA of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) and the Air Force's
Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) (32 CFR parts 989.21(b)
and 989.24(b)(7))
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Dogan, NGB/A7AM, 3501 Fetchet
Avenue, Joint Base Andrews Maryland, 20762-5157, (240) 612-8859.
Henry Williams, Jr.,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-13710 Filed 6-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P