Identification of Ukraine as a Priority Foreign Country and Initiation of Section 301 Investigation, 33886-33888 [2013-13307]
Download as PDF
33886
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 5, 2013 / Notices
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. USTR–2013–0023]
Identification of Ukraine as a Priority
Foreign Country and Initiation of
Section 301 Investigation
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of identification of
priority foreign country; initiation of
investigation; proposed determination;
request for written comment; and
invitation to participate in public
hearing.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section
182(c)(1)(B) of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (the Trade Act), in the May 1,
2013 Special 301 Report the United
States Trade Representative (Trade
Representative) identified Ukraine as a
priority foreign country due to Ukraine’s
denial of adequate and effective
protection of intellectual property rights
and its denial of fair and equitable
market access to persons that rely on
intellectual property protection.
Pursuant to section 302(b)(2) of the
Trade Act, the Trade Representative is
initiating a Section 301 investigation of
the acts, policies, and practices of the
Government of Ukraine that resulted in
the identification of Ukraine as a
priority foreign country. The Office of
the United States Trade Representative
(USTR) proposes a determination that
these acts, policies, and practices are
actionable under section 301(b). USTR
invites interested persons to submit
written comments and to participate in
a public hearing concerning the issues
covered in the investigation.
DATES: The identification of Ukraine as
a priority foreign country was made in
the May 1, 2013 Special 301 Report. The
Trade Representative initiated the
Section 301 investigation on May 30,
2013. Persons wishing to testify orally at
the public hearing must provide written
notification of their intention, as well as
a summary of their hearing testimony,
by June 27, 2013. A written version of
hearing testimony is due by July 11,
2013. The public hearing will be held
on July 18, 2013, beginning at 9:30 a.m.,
at Conference Rooms 1 and 2 at the
offices of USTR, 1724 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20508. Persons wishing
to provide written comments and/or
rebuttal comments to the hearing
testimony must do so by July 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Notifications of intent to
testify, testimony summaries, written
testimony, and comments should be
submitted electronically via
www.regulations.gov, docket number
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
USTR–2013–0023. If you are unable to
provide submissions at
www.regulations.gov, please contact
Gwendolyn Diggs, Staff Assistant to the
Section 301 Committee, at (202) 395–
3150, to arrange for an alternative
method of transmission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
procedural questions concerning
submissions, please contact Gwendolyn
Diggs at the above number. Questions
regarding this investigation should be
directed as appropriate to: Elizabeth
Kendall, Director for Intellectual
Property and Innovation, Office of the
United States Trade Representative, at
(202) 395–3580; Isabella Detwiler,
Director for Europe, at (202) 395–6146;
or Shannon Nestor, Assistant General
Counsel, at (202) 395–3150. General
questions regarding Section 301
investigations should be directed to
William Busis, Deputy Assistant U.S.
Trade Representative for Monitoring &
Enforcement and Chair of the Section
301 Committee, at (202) 395–3150.
Additional information on the
investigation, including any changes in
the time or location of the public
hearing, will be posted at www.ustr.gov,
under Trade Topics—Enforcement.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Identification of Ukraine as a
Priority Foreign Country
Section 182 of the Trade Act (19
U.S.C. 2242) authorizes the Trade
Representative to identify foreign
countries that deny adequate and
effective protection of intellectual
property rights (IPR) or that deny fair
and equitable market access to persons
that rely on intellectual property (IP)
protection. Procedures under section
182 are commonly referred to as
‘‘Special 301.’’ In making Special 301
determinations, USTR chairs an
interagency team that reviews
information from many sources, and
that consults with and makes
recommendations to the Trade
Representative on issues arising under
Special 301.
Under section 182(b) of the Trade Act,
countries that have the most onerous or
egregious acts, policies, or practices that
have the greatest adverse impact (actual
or potential) on the relevant United
States products must be identified as
‘‘priority foreign countries,’’ unless they
are entering into good faith negotiations
or are making significant progress in
bilateral or multilateral negotiations to
provide adequate and effective
protection for IPR and fair and equitable
market access for persons that rely on IP
protection. Section 182 provides that
identification of priority foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
countries shall take into account the
history of intellectual property laws and
practices of the foreign country,
including any previous identifications
as a priority foreign country; and the
history of efforts of the United States to
achieve adequate and effective
protection and enforcement of IPR and
fair and equitable market access for
persons that rely on IP protection.
In the May 1, 2013 Special 301
Report, the Trade Representative
identified Ukraine as a priority foreign
country. The identification was the
culmination of several years of growing
concern over widespread IP theft,
including the growing entrenchment of
IPR infringement that is facilitated by
government actors. During intensive
bilateral engagement, Ukraine had made
a series of commitments to make
specific improvements in the areas of
government use of pirated software,
nontransparent administration of
royalty collecting societies, and online
piracy. Notably, Ukraine and the United
States agreed to an IPR Action Plan in
2010, which Ukraine publicized in
2011. Implementation of this plan was
the subject of intensive bilateral
engagement in 2012, including through
the Trade and Investment Council
meeting. Unfortunately, the situation
regarding Ukraine’s protection of IPR
has continued to deteriorate.
A full discussion of the basis for
Ukraine’s designation is set out in the
May 1, 2013 Special 301 Report, which
may be found on www.ustr.gov under
‘Reports.’ A summary of the basis for
identification is set out below.
The first ground for the Trade
Representative’s identification of
Ukraine as a priority foreign country is
the unfair, nontransparent
administration of the system for
collecting societies, which are
responsible for collecting and
distributing royalties to U.S. and other
rights holders. Ukraine has recognized
that it has a significant problem with the
operation of illegal or ‘‘rogue’’ collecting
societies, i.e., organizations that collect
royalties by falsely claiming they are
authorized to do so. Such organizations
tend to operate without adequate
transparency and rarely disburse
sufficient funds that they collect to the
rights holders entitled to the royalties.
The government has not prosecuted
several rogue collecting societies—even
societies that the Government of
Ukraine determined were collecting
money without the necessary
authorization.
Recent negative developments
include the following: In May 2012, the
State Intellectual Property Service of
Ukraine revoked the authorization of the
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 5, 2013 / Notices
Ukrainian Music Rights League, a
collecting society that had disbursed
royalties to rights holders. In August
2012, a Ukrainian court issued a ruling
that invalidated Ukraine’s procedure for
accrediting collecting societies.
Currently, there are no authorized
collecting societies in Ukraine in
important spheres such as public
performance rights.
Second, there is widespread use of
infringing software by Ukrainian
government agencies. The Government
of Ukraine acknowledges that a
significant percentage of the software
used by the government is unlicensed.
The Government of Ukraine has further
acknowledged the need for the
government to use licensed software,
and has issued repeated official
documents calling for such use as far
back as 2002, most recently in April
2013. To date, however, the government
has not addressed this problem. Most
recently, the Government of Ukraine
budgeted 100 million UAH (equivalent
to $12.3 million) for 2013 software
licensing in state institutions. However,
the Government of Ukraine has not
disbursed these funds to rights holders
or taken any other concrete steps toward
addressing the use of unlicensed
software.
Third, the Government of Ukraine has
failed to implement an effective and
systemic means to combat the
widespread online infringement of
copyright and related rights, including
failures to institute transparent and
predictable provisions on intermediary
liability and liability for third parties
that facilitate piracy; to introduce
limitations on such liability for Internet
Service Providers (ISPs); and to enforce
takedown notices for infringing online
content. Online piracy now has
significant and growing consequences
for both the Ukrainian market and for
international trade. For example, several
of Ukraine’s BitTorrent sites are among
the most popular in markets such as
India, illustrating how Ukraine has
become perceived as a safe haven for
online piracy enterprises serving
multiple markets.
There was not a single online piracyrelated conviction in Ukraine in 2012.
In late January 2012, the Government of
Ukraine seized servers as part of a
criminal investigation into one of
Ukraine’s most visited Web sites that
was (and remains) a prolific source of
infringing international music, software,
and video. However, the site reopened
shortly thereafter, and continues to
monetize infringing content.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
2. Initiation of Section 301 Investigation
Under Section 302(b)(2) of the Trade
Act (19 U.S.C. 2412(b)(2)), the Trade
Representative shall initiate an
investigation under Chapter 1 of Title III
of the Trade Act (commonly referred to
as ‘‘Section 301’’) with respect to any
act, policy, or practice that was the basis
of the identification of a country as a
priority foreign country under section
182 of the Trade Act. (Section 302(b)(2)
provides exceptions where such acts,
policies, and practices are already
subject to investigation or action under
Section 301, or where an investigation
would not be in the national economic
interest.)
Pursuant to Section 302(b)(2), and in
accord with the advice of the
interagency Section 301 Committee, on
May 30, 2013, the Trade Representative
initiated a Section 301 investigation of
the acts, policies, and practices of
Ukraine that resulted in the priority
foreign country identification.
The investigation will examine
whether these acts, policies, and
practices are actionable under section
301(b) of the Trade Act, and, if so, what
action the Trade Representative should
take under Section 301(b). Acts,
policies, or practices of a foreign
country are actionable under section
301(b) if they are unreasonable and
burden or restrict U.S. commerce. Under
section 301(d)(3)(B)(i)(II) of the Trade
Act, unreasonable acts, policies, or
practices include any act, policy, or
practice which denies fair and equitable
provision of adequate and effective
protection of intellectual property
rights, notwithstanding the fact that the
foreign country may be in compliance
with the specific obligations of the
Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS
Agreement). Furthermore, under section
301(d)(3)(B)(i)(III) of the Trade Act,
unreasonable acts, policies, or practices
also include any act, policy, or practice
which denies fair and equitable
nondiscriminatory market access
opportunities for persons that rely upon
intellectual property protection.
Section 303(a) of the Trade Act
provides that on the date of initiation of
a Section 301 investigation, the Trade
Representative shall request
consultations with the foreign country
concerned regarding the issue involved
in the investigation. In accordance with
Section 303(a), by letter dated May 30,
2013, the Trade Representative
requested consultations with the
Government of Ukraine regarding the
issues under investigation. Because the
issues under investigation do not
involve a trade agreement, the request
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33887
for consultations does not involve
formal dispute settlement procedures
under a trade agreement.
USTR will seek information and
advice from appropriate representatives
provided for under section 135 of the
Trade Act in preparing the U.S.
presentations for such consultations.
3. Proposed Determination and
Schedule for Investigation
USTR proposes a determination under
sections 304(a)(1)(A) and 301(b) of the
Trade Act that the acts, policies, and
practices of Ukraine with respect to
intellectual property rights (summarized
above) that resulted in the identification
of Ukraine as a priority foreign country
under Special 301 are unreasonable and
burden or restrict United States
commerce. If the Trade Representative
makes a final determination under
304(a)(1)(A) that these acts, policies,
and practices are actionable under
Section 301(b), the Trade Representative
also will determine under Section
304(a)(1)(B) what action to take under
Section 301(b).
Section 304(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act
provides that in an investigation
initiated pursuant to a priority foreign
country designation, and not involving
a trade agreement, the Trade
Representative shall make the
determinations under section
304(a)(1)(A) and (B) no later than six
months after the date of initiation.
Under Section 304(a)(3)(B), in certain
circumstances the Trade Representative
may extend the investigation for an
additional 3 months. In this
investigation, unless extended under
section 304(a)(3)(B), the determinations
under section 304(a)(1)(A) and (B)
would be made by no later than
November 30, 2013.
4. Public Comments
a. Written Comments
The Section 301 Committee invites
interested persons to submit written
comments and to participate in a public
hearing on the matters under
investigation. The subject matter of any
written comments and oral testimony
may include comments on: (i) The acts,
policies, and practices of the
Government of Ukraine that are the
subject of this investigation; (ii) the
amount of burden or restriction on U.S.
commerce caused by these acts,
policies, and practices; (iii) whether—as
described in the above proposed
determination—the acts, policies, and
practices of Ukraine are actionable
under section 301(b); and (iv) what
action the Trade Representative should
take under section 301(b).
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
33888
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 5, 2013 / Notices
As noted above, interested persons
should submit any written comments, as
well as any rebuttal comments to the
hearing testimony, by July 31, 2013.
b. Oral Testimony
A public hearing will be held on July
18 in Conference Rooms 1 and 2 at the
offices of USTR, 1724 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20508. Persons wishing
to testify at the hearing must provide
written notification of their intention by
June 27, 2013. The intent to testify
notification must be made in the ‘‘Type
Comment’’ field under docket number
USTR–2013–0023 on the
www.regulations.gov Web site and
should include the name, address, and
telephone number of the person
intending to present testimony. A
summary of the testimony must
accompany the notification. After the
Chairman of the Section 301 Committee
considers the request to present oral
testimony at the hearing, the Staff
Assistant to the Section 301 Committee
will notify the applicant of the time of
his or her testimony. A full, written
version of hearing testimony is due by
July 11, 2013. Remarks at the hearing
should be limited to no more than ten
minutes to allow for possible questions
from the Section 301 Committee.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
c. Rebuttal Comments
To allow interested persons an
opportunity to contest the information
provided by other parties at the hearing,
USTR will accept written rebuttal
comments, which must be filed by July
31, 2013. Rebuttal comments should be
limited to demonstrating errors of fact or
analysis not pointed out in the hearing
testimony and should be as concise as
possible.
5. Requirements for Submissions
Persons submitting written comments,
written hearing testimony, or rebuttal
comments must do so in English and
must identify (on the first page of the
submission) the ‘‘Ukraine Section 301
Investigation.’’ Any comments that
include quantitative discussions of
burdens or restrictions on U.S.
commerce should be accompanied by
the methodology used in calculating
such burdens or restrictions.
To ensure the timely receipt and
consideration of comments, USTR
strongly encourages interested persons
to make on-line submissions, using the
www.regulations.gov Web site. To
submit comments via
www.regulations.gov, enter docket
number USTR–2013–0023 on the home
page and click ‘‘search.’’ The site will
provide a search-results page listing all
documents associated with this docket.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:43 Jun 04, 2013
Jkt 229001
Find a reference to this notice and click
on the link entitled ‘‘Comment Now.’’
(For further information on using the
www.regulations.gov Web site, please
consult the resources provided on the
Web site by clicking on ‘‘How to Use
This Site’’ on the left side of the home
page).
The www.regulations.gov Web site
allows users to provide comments by
filling in a ‘‘Type Comment’’ field, or by
attaching a document using an ‘‘Upload
File’’ field. USTR prefers that comments
be provided in an attached document. If
a document is attached, it is sufficient
to type ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘Type
Comment’’ field. USTR prefers
submissions in Microsoft Word (.doc) or
Adobe Acrobat (.pdf). If the submission
is in another format, please indicate the
name of the software application in the
‘‘Type Comment’’ field.
For any comments submitted
electronically containing business
confidential information, the file name
of the business confidential version
should begin with the characters ‘‘BC’’.
Any page containing business
confidential information must be clearly
marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’
on the top of that page. Filers of
submissions containing business
confidential information must also
submit a public version of their
comments. The file name of the public
version should begin with the character
‘‘P’’. The ‘‘BC’’ and ‘‘P’’ should be
followed by the name of the person or
entity submitting the comments. Filers
submitting comments containing no
business confidential information
should name their file using the name
of the person or entity submitting the
comments.
Please do not attach separate cover
letters to electronic submissions; rather,
include any information that might
appear in a cover letter in the comments
themselves. Similarly, to the extent
possible, please include any exhibits,
annexes, or other attachments in the
same file as the submission itself, not as
separate files.
As noted, USTR strongly urges
submitters to file comments through
www.regulations.gov, if at all possible.
Any alternative arrangements must be
made with Gwendolyn Diggs in advance
of transmitting a comment. Ms. Diggs
should be contacted at (202) 395–3150.
6. Public Docket
Submissions will be placed in the
docket and open to public inspection
pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except
business confidential information
exempt from public inspection in
accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15.
Submissions may be viewed on the
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
www.regulations.gov Web site by
entering docket number USTR–2013–
0023 in the search field on the home
page.
William Busis,
Chair, Section 301 Committee.
[FR Doc. 2013–13307 Filed 6–4–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290–F3–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
National Freight Advisory Committee:
Notice of Public Meeting
ACTION:
Notice of Public Meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
public meeting of the National Freight
Advisory Committee (NFAC). The
NFAC will provide information, advice,
and recommendations to the U.S.
Secretary of Transportation on matters
relating to U.S. freight transportation,
including implementation of the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP–21), Public Law
112–141.
DATES: The meeting will be held on June
25, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the U.S. Department of Transportation,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tretha Chromey, Designated Federal
Officer at (202) 366–1999 or
freight@dot.gov or visit the NFAC Web
site at www.dot.gov/nfac which is under
construction.
Additional Information
Background: The NFAC is established
under the authority of the U.S.
Department of Transportation, in
accordance with the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. App. 2). The Secretary of
Transportation has determined that
establishment of the committee is in the
public interest. The NFAC provides
advice and recommendations to the
Secretary on matters related to freight
transportation in the United States,
including (1) Implementation of the
freight transportation requirements of
the Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act (Pub. L. 112–141); (2)
establishment of the National Freight
Network; (3) development of a National
Freight Strategic Plan; (4) development
of strategies to help States implement
State Freight Advisory Committees and
State Freight Plans; and (5) development
of measures of conditions and
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33886-33888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13307]
[[Page 33886]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket No. USTR-2013-0023]
Identification of Ukraine as a Priority Foreign Country and
Initiation of Section 301 Investigation
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice of identification of priority foreign country;
initiation of investigation; proposed determination; request for
written comment; and invitation to participate in public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 182(c)(1)(B) of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended (the Trade Act), in the May 1, 2013 Special 301 Report the
United States Trade Representative (Trade Representative) identified
Ukraine as a priority foreign country due to Ukraine's denial of
adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights and
its denial of fair and equitable market access to persons that rely on
intellectual property protection. Pursuant to section 302(b)(2) of the
Trade Act, the Trade Representative is initiating a Section 301
investigation of the acts, policies, and practices of the Government of
Ukraine that resulted in the identification of Ukraine as a priority
foreign country. The Office of the United States Trade Representative
(USTR) proposes a determination that these acts, policies, and
practices are actionable under section 301(b). USTR invites interested
persons to submit written comments and to participate in a public
hearing concerning the issues covered in the investigation.
DATES: The identification of Ukraine as a priority foreign country was
made in the May 1, 2013 Special 301 Report. The Trade Representative
initiated the Section 301 investigation on May 30, 2013. Persons
wishing to testify orally at the public hearing must provide written
notification of their intention, as well as a summary of their hearing
testimony, by June 27, 2013. A written version of hearing testimony is
due by July 11, 2013. The public hearing will be held on July 18, 2013,
beginning at 9:30 a.m., at Conference Rooms 1 and 2 at the offices of
USTR, 1724 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20508. Persons wishing to
provide written comments and/or rebuttal comments to the hearing
testimony must do so by July 31, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Notifications of intent to testify, testimony summaries,
written testimony, and comments should be submitted electronically via
www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2013-0023. If you are unable to
provide submissions at www.regulations.gov, please contact Gwendolyn
Diggs, Staff Assistant to the Section 301 Committee, at (202) 395-3150,
to arrange for an alternative method of transmission.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For procedural questions concerning
submissions, please contact Gwendolyn Diggs at the above number.
Questions regarding this investigation should be directed as
appropriate to: Elizabeth Kendall, Director for Intellectual Property
and Innovation, Office of the United States Trade Representative, at
(202) 395-3580; Isabella Detwiler, Director for Europe, at (202) 395-
6146; or Shannon Nestor, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 395-3150.
General questions regarding Section 301 investigations should be
directed to William Busis, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative
for Monitoring & Enforcement and Chair of the Section 301 Committee, at
(202) 395-3150. Additional information on the investigation, including
any changes in the time or location of the public hearing, will be
posted at www.ustr.gov, under Trade Topics--Enforcement.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Identification of Ukraine as a Priority Foreign Country
Section 182 of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2242) authorizes the Trade
Representative to identify foreign countries that deny adequate and
effective protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) or that deny
fair and equitable market access to persons that rely on intellectual
property (IP) protection. Procedures under section 182 are commonly
referred to as ``Special 301.'' In making Special 301 determinations,
USTR chairs an interagency team that reviews information from many
sources, and that consults with and makes recommendations to the Trade
Representative on issues arising under Special 301.
Under section 182(b) of the Trade Act, countries that have the most
onerous or egregious acts, policies, or practices that have the
greatest adverse impact (actual or potential) on the relevant United
States products must be identified as ``priority foreign countries,''
unless they are entering into good faith negotiations or are making
significant progress in bilateral or multilateral negotiations to
provide adequate and effective protection for IPR and fair and
equitable market access for persons that rely on IP protection. Section
182 provides that identification of priority foreign countries shall
take into account the history of intellectual property laws and
practices of the foreign country, including any previous
identifications as a priority foreign country; and the history of
efforts of the United States to achieve adequate and effective
protection and enforcement of IPR and fair and equitable market access
for persons that rely on IP protection.
In the May 1, 2013 Special 301 Report, the Trade Representative
identified Ukraine as a priority foreign country. The identification
was the culmination of several years of growing concern over widespread
IP theft, including the growing entrenchment of IPR infringement that
is facilitated by government actors. During intensive bilateral
engagement, Ukraine had made a series of commitments to make specific
improvements in the areas of government use of pirated software,
nontransparent administration of royalty collecting societies, and
online piracy. Notably, Ukraine and the United States agreed to an IPR
Action Plan in 2010, which Ukraine publicized in 2011. Implementation
of this plan was the subject of intensive bilateral engagement in 2012,
including through the Trade and Investment Council meeting.
Unfortunately, the situation regarding Ukraine's protection of IPR has
continued to deteriorate.
A full discussion of the basis for Ukraine's designation is set out
in the May 1, 2013 Special 301 Report, which may be found on
www.ustr.gov under `Reports.' A summary of the basis for identification
is set out below.
The first ground for the Trade Representative's identification of
Ukraine as a priority foreign country is the unfair, nontransparent
administration of the system for collecting societies, which are
responsible for collecting and distributing royalties to U.S. and other
rights holders. Ukraine has recognized that it has a significant
problem with the operation of illegal or ``rogue'' collecting
societies, i.e., organizations that collect royalties by falsely
claiming they are authorized to do so. Such organizations tend to
operate without adequate transparency and rarely disburse sufficient
funds that they collect to the rights holders entitled to the
royalties. The government has not prosecuted several rogue collecting
societies--even societies that the Government of Ukraine determined
were collecting money without the necessary authorization.
Recent negative developments include the following: In May 2012,
the State Intellectual Property Service of Ukraine revoked the
authorization of the
[[Page 33887]]
Ukrainian Music Rights League, a collecting society that had disbursed
royalties to rights holders. In August 2012, a Ukrainian court issued a
ruling that invalidated Ukraine's procedure for accrediting collecting
societies. Currently, there are no authorized collecting societies in
Ukraine in important spheres such as public performance rights.
Second, there is widespread use of infringing software by Ukrainian
government agencies. The Government of Ukraine acknowledges that a
significant percentage of the software used by the government is
unlicensed. The Government of Ukraine has further acknowledged the need
for the government to use licensed software, and has issued repeated
official documents calling for such use as far back as 2002, most
recently in April 2013. To date, however, the government has not
addressed this problem. Most recently, the Government of Ukraine
budgeted 100 million UAH (equivalent to $12.3 million) for 2013
software licensing in state institutions. However, the Government of
Ukraine has not disbursed these funds to rights holders or taken any
other concrete steps toward addressing the use of unlicensed software.
Third, the Government of Ukraine has failed to implement an
effective and systemic means to combat the widespread online
infringement of copyright and related rights, including failures to
institute transparent and predictable provisions on intermediary
liability and liability for third parties that facilitate piracy; to
introduce limitations on such liability for Internet Service Providers
(ISPs); and to enforce takedown notices for infringing online content.
Online piracy now has significant and growing consequences for both the
Ukrainian market and for international trade. For example, several of
Ukraine's BitTorrent sites are among the most popular in markets such
as India, illustrating how Ukraine has become perceived as a safe haven
for online piracy enterprises serving multiple markets.
There was not a single online piracy-related conviction in Ukraine
in 2012. In late January 2012, the Government of Ukraine seized servers
as part of a criminal investigation into one of Ukraine's most visited
Web sites that was (and remains) a prolific source of infringing
international music, software, and video. However, the site reopened
shortly thereafter, and continues to monetize infringing content.
2. Initiation of Section 301 Investigation
Under Section 302(b)(2) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2412(b)(2)),
the Trade Representative shall initiate an investigation under Chapter
1 of Title III of the Trade Act (commonly referred to as ``Section
301'') with respect to any act, policy, or practice that was the basis
of the identification of a country as a priority foreign country under
section 182 of the Trade Act. (Section 302(b)(2) provides exceptions
where such acts, policies, and practices are already subject to
investigation or action under Section 301, or where an investigation
would not be in the national economic interest.)
Pursuant to Section 302(b)(2), and in accord with the advice of the
interagency Section 301 Committee, on May 30, 2013, the Trade
Representative initiated a Section 301 investigation of the acts,
policies, and practices of Ukraine that resulted in the priority
foreign country identification.
The investigation will examine whether these acts, policies, and
practices are actionable under section 301(b) of the Trade Act, and, if
so, what action the Trade Representative should take under Section
301(b). Acts, policies, or practices of a foreign country are
actionable under section 301(b) if they are unreasonable and burden or
restrict U.S. commerce. Under section 301(d)(3)(B)(i)(II) of the Trade
Act, unreasonable acts, policies, or practices include any act, policy,
or practice which denies fair and equitable provision of adequate and
effective protection of intellectual property rights, notwithstanding
the fact that the foreign country may be in compliance with the
specific obligations of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of
Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). Furthermore, under
section 301(d)(3)(B)(i)(III) of the Trade Act, unreasonable acts,
policies, or practices also include any act, policy, or practice which
denies fair and equitable nondiscriminatory market access opportunities
for persons that rely upon intellectual property protection.
Section 303(a) of the Trade Act provides that on the date of
initiation of a Section 301 investigation, the Trade Representative
shall request consultations with the foreign country concerned
regarding the issue involved in the investigation. In accordance with
Section 303(a), by letter dated May 30, 2013, the Trade Representative
requested consultations with the Government of Ukraine regarding the
issues under investigation. Because the issues under investigation do
not involve a trade agreement, the request for consultations does not
involve formal dispute settlement procedures under a trade agreement.
USTR will seek information and advice from appropriate
representatives provided for under section 135 of the Trade Act in
preparing the U.S. presentations for such consultations.
3. Proposed Determination and Schedule for Investigation
USTR proposes a determination under sections 304(a)(1)(A) and
301(b) of the Trade Act that the acts, policies, and practices of
Ukraine with respect to intellectual property rights (summarized above)
that resulted in the identification of Ukraine as a priority foreign
country under Special 301 are unreasonable and burden or restrict
United States commerce. If the Trade Representative makes a final
determination under 304(a)(1)(A) that these acts, policies, and
practices are actionable under Section 301(b), the Trade Representative
also will determine under Section 304(a)(1)(B) what action to take
under Section 301(b).
Section 304(a)(3)(A) of the Trade Act provides that in an
investigation initiated pursuant to a priority foreign country
designation, and not involving a trade agreement, the Trade
Representative shall make the determinations under section 304(a)(1)(A)
and (B) no later than six months after the date of initiation. Under
Section 304(a)(3)(B), in certain circumstances the Trade Representative
may extend the investigation for an additional 3 months. In this
investigation, unless extended under section 304(a)(3)(B), the
determinations under section 304(a)(1)(A) and (B) would be made by no
later than November 30, 2013.
4. Public Comments
a. Written Comments
The Section 301 Committee invites interested persons to submit
written comments and to participate in a public hearing on the matters
under investigation. The subject matter of any written comments and
oral testimony may include comments on: (i) The acts, policies, and
practices of the Government of Ukraine that are the subject of this
investigation; (ii) the amount of burden or restriction on U.S.
commerce caused by these acts, policies, and practices; (iii) whether--
as described in the above proposed determination--the acts, policies,
and practices of Ukraine are actionable under section 301(b); and (iv)
what action the Trade Representative should take under section 301(b).
[[Page 33888]]
As noted above, interested persons should submit any written
comments, as well as any rebuttal comments to the hearing testimony, by
July 31, 2013.
b. Oral Testimony
A public hearing will be held on July 18 in Conference Rooms 1 and
2 at the offices of USTR, 1724 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20508.
Persons wishing to testify at the hearing must provide written
notification of their intention by June 27, 2013. The intent to testify
notification must be made in the ``Type Comment'' field under docket
number USTR-2013-0023 on the www.regulations.gov Web site and should
include the name, address, and telephone number of the person intending
to present testimony. A summary of the testimony must accompany the
notification. After the Chairman of the Section 301 Committee considers
the request to present oral testimony at the hearing, the Staff
Assistant to the Section 301 Committee will notify the applicant of the
time of his or her testimony. A full, written version of hearing
testimony is due by July 11, 2013. Remarks at the hearing should be
limited to no more than ten minutes to allow for possible questions
from the Section 301 Committee.
c. Rebuttal Comments
To allow interested persons an opportunity to contest the
information provided by other parties at the hearing, USTR will accept
written rebuttal comments, which must be filed by July 31, 2013.
Rebuttal comments should be limited to demonstrating errors of fact or
analysis not pointed out in the hearing testimony and should be as
concise as possible.
5. Requirements for Submissions
Persons submitting written comments, written hearing testimony, or
rebuttal comments must do so in English and must identify (on the first
page of the submission) the ``Ukraine Section 301 Investigation.'' Any
comments that include quantitative discussions of burdens or
restrictions on U.S. commerce should be accompanied by the methodology
used in calculating such burdens or restrictions.
To ensure the timely receipt and consideration of comments, USTR
strongly encourages interested persons to make on-line submissions,
using the www.regulations.gov Web site. To submit comments via
www.regulations.gov, enter docket number USTR-2013-0023 on the home
page and click ``search.'' The site will provide a search-results page
listing all documents associated with this docket. Find a reference to
this notice and click on the link entitled ``Comment Now.'' (For
further information on using the www.regulations.gov Web site, please
consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on ``How to
Use This Site'' on the left side of the home page).
The www.regulations.gov Web site allows users to provide comments
by filling in a ``Type Comment'' field, or by attaching a document
using an ``Upload File'' field. USTR prefers that comments be provided
in an attached document. If a document is attached, it is sufficient to
type ``See attached'' in the ``Type Comment'' field. USTR prefers
submissions in Microsoft Word (.doc) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf). If the
submission is in another format, please indicate the name of the
software application in the ``Type Comment'' field.
For any comments submitted electronically containing business
confidential information, the file name of the business confidential
version should begin with the characters ``BC''. Any page containing
business confidential information must be clearly marked ``BUSINESS
CONFIDENTIAL'' on the top of that page. Filers of submissions
containing business confidential information must also submit a public
version of their comments. The file name of the public version should
begin with the character ``P''. The ``BC'' and ``P'' should be followed
by the name of the person or entity submitting the comments. Filers
submitting comments containing no business confidential information
should name their file using the name of the person or entity
submitting the comments.
Please do not attach separate cover letters to electronic
submissions; rather, include any information that might appear in a
cover letter in the comments themselves. Similarly, to the extent
possible, please include any exhibits, annexes, or other attachments in
the same file as the submission itself, not as separate files.
As noted, USTR strongly urges submitters to file comments through
www.regulations.gov, if at all possible. Any alternative arrangements
must be made with Gwendolyn Diggs in advance of transmitting a comment.
Ms. Diggs should be contacted at (202) 395-3150.
6. Public Docket
Submissions will be placed in the docket and open to public
inspection pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except business confidential
information exempt from public inspection in accordance with 15 CFR
2006.15. Submissions may be viewed on the www.regulations.gov Web site
by entering docket number USTR-2013-0023 in the search field on the
home page.
William Busis,
Chair, Section 301 Committee.
[FR Doc. 2013-13307 Filed 6-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290-F3-P