Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, 33208-33209 [2013-13138]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
33208
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective July 9, 2013.
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 100–29–14, dated December
16, 2010.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(i) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install on any airplane a
hydraulic system accumulator having P/N
900095–1, on which the letter ‘‘E’’ is not part
of the suffix of the serial number on the
identification plate.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model
BD–100–1A10 (Challenger 300) airplanes,
certificated in any category, having serial
numbers 20003 through 20335 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 29, Hydraulic Power.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of failure
of a screw-cap or end cap of the hydraulic
system accumulator while on the ground,
which resulted in loss of use of that
hydraulic system and high-energy impact
damage to adjacent systems and structures.
We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of
a screw cap or end cap and loss of the related
hydraulic system, which could result in
damage to airplane structure and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(g) Inspection
At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD:
Inspect the identification plate on the
hydraulic system accumulator having part
number (P/N) 900095–1 to determine if an
‘‘E’’ is part of the suffix of the serial number
stamped on the identification plate, as listed
in paragraph 2.B. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
100–29–14, dated December 16, 2010. A
review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
suffix of the serial number can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(1) For an accumulator that has
accumulated more than 3,150 total flight
cycles as of the effective date of this AD,
inspect that accumulator within 350 flight
cycles after the effective date of this AD.
(2) For an accumulator that has
accumulated 3,150 or fewer total flight cycles
as of the effective date of this AD, inspect
that accumulator before it has accumulated
3,500 total flight cycles.
(3) For an accumulator on which it is not
possible to determine the total flight cycles
accumulated as of the effective date of this
AD, inspect that accumulator within 350
flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(h) Replacement
If, during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, any accumulator
having P/N 900095–1 is found on which the
letter ‘‘E’’ is not part of the suffix of the serial
number on the identification plate: Before
further flight, replace the accumulator with a
new or serviceable accumulator, in
accordance with paragraph 2.C. of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to the Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
(516) 228–7300; fax (516) 794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(k) Related Information
Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2011–41, dated October 31,
2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–
29–14, dated December 16, 2010; for related
information.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 100–29–14,
dated December 16, 2010.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
(4) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 22,
2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–12898 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
(DoN) is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) of the DoN has
determined that USS THEODORE
ROOSEVELT (CVN 71) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot
comply fully with certain provisions of
the 72 COLREGS without interfering
with its special function as a naval ship.
The intended effect of this rule is to
warn mariners in waters where 72
COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective June 4, 2013
and is applicable beginning May 20,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Jocelyn Loftus-Williams,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney,
(Admiralty and Maritime Law), Office of
the Judge Advocate General, Department
of the Navy, 1322 Patterson Ave. SE.,
Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC
20374–5066, telephone number: 202–
685–5040
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR Part 706.
This amendment provides notice that
the DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law) of the DoN, under authority
delegated by the Secretary of the Navy,
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
33209
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
has certified that USS THEODORE
ROOSEVELT (CVN 71) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot
comply fully with the following specific
provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship: Annex I, paragraph 2(g),
pertaining to the placement of the
sidelights above the hull; and Annex I,
paragraph 2(i) (iii), pertaining to the
vertical line spacing of the task lights.
The DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime
Law) has also certified that the lights
involved are located in closest possible
compliance with the applicable 72
COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR Parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine Safety, Navigation (Water),
and Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the CFR as follows:
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605
2. Section 706.2 is amended as
follows:
■ A. In Table Two by revising the entry
for USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN
71); and
■ B. In Table Four by adding the
following entry for USS THEODORE
ROOSEVELT (CVN 71).
The additions read as follows:
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 706
continues to read:
■
TABLE TWO
Vessel
Number
USS THEODORE
ROOSEVELT.
Masthead
lights, distance to
stbd of keel
in meters;
Rule 21(a)
Forward anchor light,
distance
below flight
dk in meters;
§ 2(K),
Annex I
30.0
—
CVN 71 ..
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
—
Side lights,
distance forward of forward masthead light in
meters;
§ 3(b),
Annex I
Side lights,
distance inboard of
ship’s sides
in meters;
§ 3(b),
Annex I
....................
0.43
—
—
*
*
....................
AFT anchor
light, number of; Rule
30(a)(ii)
Side lights,
distance
below flight
dk in meters; § 2 (g),
Annex I
*
*
Forward anchor light,
number of;
Rule 30(a)(i)
AFT anchor
light, distance below
flight dk in
meters;
Rule 21(e),
Rule
30(a)(ii)
*
TABLE FOUR
Vertical separation of the task light array is not equally
spaced, the separation between the middle and lower
task light exceed the separation between the upper and
middle light by
Vessel
No
USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT ......................................
CVN 71 ...............................
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
A. B. Fischer,
Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant
Judge Advocate, General (Admiralty and
Maritime Law).
C. K. Chiappetta,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–13138 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
15:17 Jun 03, 2013
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
32 CFR Part 2402
Implementation of the Freedom of
Information Act
Office of Science and
Technology Policy.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
issues this final rule to implement the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
0.18 meter
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
amended. This final rule implements
the requirement of the FOIA by setting
forth procedures for requesting access
to, and making disclosures of,
information contained by OSTP.
This final rule contains provisions to
comply with the President’s January 21,
2009, Executive Memoranda on ‘‘The
Freedom of Information Act’’ and
‘‘Transparency and Open Government,’’
and Attorney General Holder’s March
19, 2009, Memorandum on ‘‘The
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).’’ In
addition, this rule reflects OSTP’s
policy and practices and reaffirms its
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33208-33209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13138]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) is amending its
certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the
Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (DAJAG) (Admiralty and Maritime
Law) of the DoN has determined that USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71) is
a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special construction and
purpose, cannot comply fully with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS
without interfering with its special function as a naval ship. The
intended effect of this rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72
COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective June 4, 2013 and is applicable beginning
May 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Jocelyn Loftus-Williams,
JAGC, U.S. Navy, Admiralty Attorney, (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1322
Patterson Ave. SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5066,
telephone number: 202-685-5040
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33
U.S.C. 1605, the DoN amends 32 CFR Part 706.
This amendment provides notice that the DAJAG (Admiralty and
Maritime Law) of the DoN, under authority delegated by the Secretary of
the Navy,
[[Page 33209]]
has certified that USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71) is a vessel of the
Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot comply
fully with the following specific provisions of 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a naval ship: Annex I,
paragraph 2(g), pertaining to the placement of the sidelights above the
hull; and Annex I, paragraph 2(i) (iii), pertaining to the vertical
line spacing of the task lights. The DAJAG (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
has also certified that the lights involved are located in closest
possible compliance with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR Parts
296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment
prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public
interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of
lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its
military functions.
List of subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine Safety, Navigation (Water), and Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 706 of title
32 of the CFR as follows:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for part 706 continues to read:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605
0
2. Section 706.2 is amended as follows:
0
A. In Table Two by revising the entry for USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN
71); and
0
B. In Table Four by adding the following entry for USS THEODORE
ROOSEVELT (CVN 71).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
* * * * *
Table Two
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Side
Forward AFT anchor Side lights, Side
Masthead anchor Forward light, lights, distance lights,
lights, light, anchor distance AFT anchor distance forward of distance
distance to distance light, below light, below forward inboard of
Vessel Number stbd of below number of; flight dk number of; flight dk masthead ship's
keel in flight dk Rule in meters; Rule in meters; light in sides in
meters; in meters; 30(a)(i) Rule 21(e), 30(a)(ii) Sec. 2 meters; meters;
Rule 21(a) Sec. Rule (g), Annex Sec. Sec.
2(K), Annex 30(a)(ii) I 3(b), Annex 3(b), Annex
--------------------------------------------------------------------I----------------------------------------------------------------I------------I-----
USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT........ CVN 71.......... 30.0 -- ........... -- ........... 0.43 -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
Table Four
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vertical separation
of the task light
array is not equally
spaced, the
separation between
Vessel No the middle and lower
task light exceed the
separation between
the upper and middle
light by
------------------------------------------------------------------------
USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT........ CVN 71........... 0.18 meter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
A. B. Fischer,
Captain, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate, General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law).
C. K. Chiappetta,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-13138 Filed 6-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
