Tobacco Product Analysis; Scientific Workshop; Request for Comments, 33424-33426 [2013-13084]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 33424 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a disability, visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/ AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading ‘‘Resources for You,’’ click on ‘‘Public Meetings at the FDA White Oak Campus.’’ Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter through Building 1. Contact Person: Cindy Hong, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–9001, Fax: 301–847–8533, email: AAC@fda.hhs.gov, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1–800– 741–8138 (301–443–0572 in the Washington, DC area). A notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications that impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot always be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore, you should always check the Agency’s Web site at https:// www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/ default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee link, or call the advisory committee information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to the meeting. Agenda: On July 23, 2013, during the morning session, the committee will discuss supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) 125057, HUMIRA (adalimumab) injection, by AbbVie Inc., for the proposed indication of reducing signs and symptoms in adult patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis with objective signs of inflammation by elevated C-reactive protein or magnetic resonance imaging, who have had an inadequate response to, or are intolerant to, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. During the afternoon session, the committee will discuss sBLA 125160, certolizumab injection, by UCB, Inc., for the proposed indication of treatment of adult patients with active axial spondyloarthritis, including patients with ankylosing spondylitis. FDA intends to make background material available to the public no later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the background material will be made publicly available at the location of the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be posted on FDA’s Web site after the meeting. Background material is available at https://www.fda.gov/ AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/ VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:33 Jun 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee link. Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before July 8, 2013. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between approximately 10:35 a.m. to 11:05 a.m., and 3:45 p.m. to 4:15 p.m. Those individuals interested in making formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to make their presentation on or before June 27, 2013. Time allotted for each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding their request to speak by June 28, 2013. Persons attending FDA’s advisory committee meetings are advised that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical outlets. FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Cindy Hong at least 7 days in advance of the meeting. FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee meetings. Please visit our Web site at https://www.fda.gov/ AdvisoryCommittees/ AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ ucm111462.htm for procedures on public conduct during advisory committee meetings. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2). Dated: May 28, 2013. Jill Hartzler Warner, Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs. [FR Doc. 2013–13082 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0212] Tobacco Product Analysis; Scientific Workshop; Request for Comments AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Notice of public workshop; request for comments. ACTION: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Tobacco Products, is announcing a scientific workshop to obtain input on the chemical analysis of tobacco products. The analyses of tobacco products include developing test methods and evaluating method performance to ensure the results of the analyses are reliable and accurate. This scientific workshop will focus on understanding the testing of tobacco filler and smoke from cigarettes, rollyour-own (RYO) tobacco, and smokeless tobacco products for specific chemicals. FDA is also opening a public docket to receive comments on these topics. Dates and Times: The public workshop will be held on July 30, 2013, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and on July 31, 2013, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Individuals who wish to attend the public workshop must register by close of business on July 1, 2013. Submit either electronic or written comments to the docket by September 30, 2013. Location: The public workshop will be held at 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 1–877–287–1373. Contact Person: Janie Kim, Office of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD, 20850, 1–877–287–1373, FAX: 240–276–3761, email: workshop.CTPOS@fda.hhs.gov. Registration to Attend the Workshop and Requests for Oral Presentations: If you wish to attend the workshop, make an oral presentation at the workshop, or view the free webcast, you must register by submitting an electronic or written request by July 1, 2013. Please submit electronic requests to https:// surveymonkey.com/s/3RGVYFT. A confirmation email will be sent to your registered email at least 2 weeks prior to the workshop date. Those without email access may register by contacting Janie Kim (see Contact Person). Please provide contact information for each attendee, including name, title, affiliation, address, email address, and telephone number. Registration is free, but early registration is recommended because seating is limited. FDA may limit the number of participants from E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices each organization as well as the total number of participants based on space limitations. Registrants will receive confirmation once they have been accepted for the workshop. Onsite registration on the day of the workshop will be based on space availability. If registration reaches maximum capacity, FDA will post a notice closing registration for the workshop at https:// www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/ NewsEvents/ucm238308.htm. There will be opportunities for audience participation at this workshop. FDA has included topics for comment in section II of this document. FDA will do its best to accommodate requests to speak during the workshop sessions, although questions from the audience may be limited. In addition, we strongly encourage submitting comments to the docket (see Comments). If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Janie Kim (see Contact Person) at least 7 days before the workshop. Comments: Regardless of attendance at the public workshop, interested persons may submit comments on any of the topics for discussion in section II of this document by September 30, 2013. Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at https:// www.regulations.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Background In April 2012, FDA held a scientific workshop that focused on understanding how tobacco reference products and general testing methods are used to analyze tobacco products (77 FR 14814, March 13, 2012; for more information see https://www.fda.gov/ TobaccoProducts/NewsEvents/ ucm291530.htm). The scientific workshop that will be held on July 30 and July 31, 2013, will focus on understanding the testing of tobacco filler and smoke from cigarettes, RYO tobacco, and smokeless tobacco products for tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (TNCO), tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The workshop will include discussion of the VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:33 Jun 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 analytical methods used for measuring these constituents in tobacco products and smoke. The workshop will include scientific experts who will present scientific and technical information on the testing of tobacco products. Such experts could include, but are not limited to, scientists from governmental agencies, academia, tobacco product manufacturers, and contract testing laboratories. FDA is interested in receiving scientific information at the workshop and in the docket. Information from the scientific workshop may assist us in developing future scientific workshops regarding the analysis of tobacco products. II. Workshop Topics for Discussion The scientific workshop will include discussion of the analytical methods for measuring the following constituents in tobacco products and smoke: • TNCO in cigarette smoke; • TSNAs (total TSNAs, Nnitrosonornicotine) (NNN), and 4(methylnitrosamino)-1-(-pyridyl)-1butanone (NNK)) in smoke and tobacco filler (i.e., cigarette, RYO, smokeless); and • PAHs (benzo[a]pyrene, naphthalene, chrysene, benz[j]aceanthrylene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[c]phenanthrene, cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzo[a,e]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 5methylchrysene) in smoke and tobacco filler (i.e., cigarette, RYO, smokeless). FDA would like to engage in detailed discussions on chemical test methods to understand the principles and aspects of these analyses. Aspects of analytical methods encompass solution preparation, extraction, separation, detection, and method performance parameters with criteria. FDA will explore all or some of the following topics during this scientific workshop: A. TNCO in Cigarette Smoke 1. A description of the different extraction steps used when analyzing cigarette smoke for TNCO. 2. Typical concentration ranges for TNCO and the potential method adjustments to accommodate different cigarette strengths and physical parameters. 3. The optimal solvents, extraction solution, standards, and reference PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33425 tobacco product(s) typically used when analyzing TNCO. 4. The method variability and whether or not it is dependent upon different products in your portfolio. 5. The specific method challenges and limitations when testing TNCO, such as environmental moisture, water measurement variability, and extraction efficiency. 6. The major sources of variability (e.g., smoking machine or regimen, sample preparation, separation, and detection). B. TSNAs (Total, NNN, and NNK) in Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke 7. The different extraction steps used when analyzing TSNAs in tobacco filler, smokeless tobacco, and cigarette smoke particulate. 8. The optimal solvents, extraction solutions, standards, and reference tobacco product(s) needed during the extraction of TSNAs from tobacco filler or, as applicable, a Cambridge filter pad. 9. The rationale for using isotopically labeled internal standards, instead of targeted surrogates or external standards for TSNAs. The number of isotopically labeled internal standards needed to calculate the amount of TSNAs in a sample. 10. The challenges with isotopically labeled internal standards, including: (a) The commercial availability of internal standards or their analogs; (b) individual versus (vs.) mixture of internal standards; cost of internal standards; (c) deuterated vs. 13 C labeled internal standards; and (d) concerns of proton exchange with deuterated labeled internal standards. 11. The typical concentration ranges for total TSNAs, NNN, and NNK and any potential method adjustments to accommodate for different cigarette strengths and physical parameters. 12. The major sources of method variability, e.g., include sources from the smoking machine or regimen, sample preparation, separation, and detection of different tobacco product types and strengths. 13. The specific method challenges and limitations when testing NNN and NNK. 14. The differences in separation, detection, and limits of detection/ quantitation when comparing liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and gas chromatography/thermal energy analyzer for TSNA analysis. C. PAHs in Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke For the PAHs benzo[a]pyrene, naphthalene, chrysene, E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 33426 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices benz[j]aceanthrylene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[c]phenanthrene, cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzo[a,e]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 5methylchrysene: 15. The different extraction steps used when analyzing PAHs in tobacco filler, smokeless tobacco, and cigarette smoke particulate and any applicable cleanup techniques used. 16. The optimal solvents, extraction solutions, standards, and reference tobacco product(s) needed during the extraction of PAHs from tobacco filler or, as applicable, a Cambridge filter pad. 17. The rationale for using isotopically labeled internal standards instead of targeted surrogates or external standards for PAHs. The number of isotopically labeled internal standards needed to calculate the amount of PAHs in a sample. 18. The challenges with isotopically labeled internal standards, including: (a) The commercial availability of internal standards or their analogs; (b) individual vs. mixture of internal standards, cost of internal standards; (c) deuterated vs. 13 C labeled internal standards; and (d) concerns of proton exchange with deuterated labeled internal standards. 19. The typical concentration ranges for each of the PAHs listed in this document and any potential method adjustments to accommodate for different cigarette strengths and physical parameters. 20. The major sources of method variability, e.g., include sources from the smoking machine or regimen, sample preparation, separation, and detection of different tobacco product types and strengths. 21. The different methods necessary to separate and detect for PAHs. Provide the number of methods and steps typically used for each from extraction to detection. 22. The specific method challenges and limitations when analyzing testing PAHs, including: (a) Isomer separation and identification, (b) effects of tobacco blend, and (c) low vs. high molecular weight PAHs (volatility and sensitivity). 23. The differences in separation, detection, and limits of detection/ quantitation when comparing gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection, and liquid chromatography/ mass spectrometry for PAH analysis. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:33 Jun 03, 2013 Jkt 229001 D. General Method Testing for TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs in Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke 24. The solution stability for prepared solutions and procedures to ensure their integrity. 25. The typical storage conditions and shelf life (i.e., expiration dates) for tobacco product standards and samples. 26. The standard, reference, or known sample solutions used as blanks or for quality control (QC), working, and check standards when testing TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs. 27. The system suitability and acceptance criteria for each test method. The discussion may include calibration, QC, working, bracketing, and verification standards, confirmation ion ratio for mass spectrometry, chromatographic parameters (i.e., retention times, tailing factor, or peak resolution), injector precision, and blanks. 28. The critical system suitability parameters that are critical when testing TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs. 29. The actions taken when any system suitability criterion fails, including standards, QC, and subsequent sample analyses. 30. The typical run sequence when testing samples for TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs. 31. The equations to calculate sample concentrations for TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs. 32. Examples of chromatograms of reference standards and for measured TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs in tobacco products. E. Validation or Method Performance for TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs in Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke 33. The specific details when evaluating each validation parameter, which may include limit of detection, limit of quantification, method detection limit, accuracy, recovery, linearity, range, precision (repeatability), and specificity. 34. The determination of each criterion for each validation parameter when evaluating TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs. 35. The steps taken when validation parameter criteria are not met. 36. The validation parameters that are performed with reference tobacco products or standards. 37. The types and strengths of tobacco product samples used during validation and method development. 38. The process taken to revalidate a test method when changes to the PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 method (i.e., solvent, extraction method, or column) are made. 39. The validation process when using a rotary and linear smoking machine with a non-intense and intense smoking regimen. 40. The robustness or ruggedness tests that are conducted for extraction efficiency, solution stability, and small changes in instrument parameters. III. Transcripts Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is available, it will be accessible at https:// www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at the Division of Dockets Management (see Comments). A transcript will also be available in either hard copy or on CD–ROM, after submission of a Freedom of Information request. Written requests are to be sent to Division of Freedom of Information (HFI–35), Office of Management Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 6–30, Rockville, MD 20857. Dated: May 24, 2013. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2013–13084 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0559] Eli Lilly and Co.; Withdrawal of Approval of a New Drug Application for ORAFLEX AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval of a new drug application (NDA) for ORAFLEX (benoxaprofen) Tablets, held by Eli Lilly and Co. (Lilly), Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285. Lilly has voluntarily requested that approval of this application be withdrawn, and has waived its opportunity for a hearing. DATES: Effective June 4, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–3601. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 19, 1982, FDA approved ORAFLEX (benoxaprofen) Tablets, a nonsteroidal E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM 04JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33424-33426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0212]


Tobacco Product Analysis; Scientific Workshop; Request for 
Comments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public workshop; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Tobacco 
Products, is announcing a scientific workshop to obtain input on the 
chemical analysis of tobacco products. The analyses of tobacco products 
include developing test methods and evaluating method performance to 
ensure the results of the analyses are reliable and accurate. This 
scientific workshop will focus on understanding the testing of tobacco 
filler and smoke from cigarettes, roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, and 
smokeless tobacco products for specific chemicals. FDA is also opening 
a public docket to receive comments on these topics.
    Dates and Times: The public workshop will be held on July 30, 2013, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and on July 31, 2013, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 
p.m. Individuals who wish to attend the public workshop must register 
by close of business on July 1, 2013. Submit either electronic or 
written comments to the docket by September 30, 2013.
    Location: The public workshop will be held at 9200 Corporate Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20850, 1-877-287-1373.
    Contact Person: Janie Kim, Office of Science, Center for Tobacco 
Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd., 
Rockville, MD, 20850, 1-877-287-1373, FAX: 240-276-3761, email: 
workshop.CTPOS@fda.hhs.gov.
    Registration to Attend the Workshop and Requests for Oral 
Presentations: If you wish to attend the workshop, make an oral 
presentation at the workshop, or view the free webcast, you must 
register by submitting an electronic or written request by July 1, 
2013. Please submit electronic requests to https://surveymonkey.com/s/3RGVYFT. A confirmation email will be sent to your registered email at 
least 2 weeks prior to the workshop date. Those without email access 
may register by contacting Janie Kim (see Contact Person). Please 
provide contact information for each attendee, including name, title, 
affiliation, address, email address, and telephone number. Registration 
is free, but early registration is recommended because seating is 
limited. FDA may limit the number of participants from

[[Page 33425]]

each organization as well as the total number of participants based on 
space limitations. Registrants will receive confirmation once they have 
been accepted for the workshop. Onsite registration on the day of the 
workshop will be based on space availability. If registration reaches 
maximum capacity, FDA will post a notice closing registration for the 
workshop at https://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/NewsEvents/ucm238308.htm.
    There will be opportunities for audience participation at this 
workshop. FDA has included topics for comment in section II of this 
document. FDA will do its best to accommodate requests to speak during 
the workshop sessions, although questions from the audience may be 
limited. In addition, we strongly encourage submitting comments to the 
docket (see Comments).
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Janie Kim (see Contact Person) at least 7 days before the 
workshop.
    Comments: Regardless of attendance at the public workshop, 
interested persons may submit comments on any of the topics for 
discussion in section II of this document by September 30, 2013. Submit 
electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written 
comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. It 
is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with 
the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. 
Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management 
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to 
the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In April 2012, FDA held a scientific workshop that focused on 
understanding how tobacco reference products and general testing 
methods are used to analyze tobacco products (77 FR 14814, March 13, 
2012; for more information see https://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/NewsEvents/ucm291530.htm). The scientific workshop that will be held on 
July 30 and July 31, 2013, will focus on understanding the testing of 
tobacco filler and smoke from cigarettes, RYO tobacco, and smokeless 
tobacco products for tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (TNCO), 
tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), and polycyclic aromatic 
hydrocarbons (PAHs). The workshop will include discussion of the 
analytical methods used for measuring these constituents in tobacco 
products and smoke.
    The workshop will include scientific experts who will present 
scientific and technical information on the testing of tobacco 
products. Such experts could include, but are not limited to, 
scientists from governmental agencies, academia, tobacco product 
manufacturers, and contract testing laboratories.
    FDA is interested in receiving scientific information at the 
workshop and in the docket. Information from the scientific workshop 
may assist us in developing future scientific workshops regarding the 
analysis of tobacco products.

II. Workshop Topics for Discussion

    The scientific workshop will include discussion of the analytical 
methods for measuring the following constituents in tobacco products 
and smoke:
     TNCO in cigarette smoke;
     TSNAs (total TSNAs, N-nitrosonornicotine) (NNN), and 4-
(methylnitrosamino)-1-(-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)) in smoke and tobacco 
filler (i.e., cigarette, RYO, smokeless); and
     PAHs (benzo[a]pyrene, naphthalene, chrysene, 
benz[j]aceanthrylene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, 
benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[c]phenanthrene, cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, 
dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzo[a,e]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, 
dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 5-
methylchrysene) in smoke and tobacco filler (i.e., cigarette, RYO, 
smokeless).
    FDA would like to engage in detailed discussions on chemical test 
methods to understand the principles and aspects of these analyses. 
Aspects of analytical methods encompass solution preparation, 
extraction, separation, detection, and method performance parameters 
with criteria.
    FDA will explore all or some of the following topics during this 
scientific workshop:

A. TNCO in Cigarette Smoke

    1. A description of the different extraction steps used when 
analyzing cigarette smoke for TNCO.
    2. Typical concentration ranges for TNCO and the potential method 
adjustments to accommodate different cigarette strengths and physical 
parameters.
    3. The optimal solvents, extraction solution, standards, and 
reference tobacco product(s) typically used when analyzing TNCO.
    4. The method variability and whether or not it is dependent upon 
different products in your portfolio.
    5. The specific method challenges and limitations when testing 
TNCO, such as environmental moisture, water measurement variability, 
and extraction efficiency.
    6. The major sources of variability (e.g., smoking machine or 
regimen, sample preparation, separation, and detection).

B. TSNAs (Total, NNN, and NNK) in Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, 
Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke

    7. The different extraction steps used when analyzing TSNAs in 
tobacco filler, smokeless tobacco, and cigarette smoke particulate.
    8. The optimal solvents, extraction solutions, standards, and 
reference tobacco product(s) needed during the extraction of TSNAs from 
tobacco filler or, as applicable, a Cambridge filter pad.
    9. The rationale for using isotopically labeled internal standards, 
instead of targeted surrogates or external standards for TSNAs. The 
number of isotopically labeled internal standards needed to calculate 
the amount of TSNAs in a sample.
    10. The challenges with isotopically labeled internal standards, 
including: (a) The commercial availability of internal standards or 
their analogs; (b) individual versus (vs.) mixture of internal 
standards; cost of internal standards; (c) deuterated vs. \13\ C 
labeled internal standards; and (d) concerns of proton exchange with 
deuterated labeled internal standards.
    11. The typical concentration ranges for total TSNAs, NNN, and NNK 
and any potential method adjustments to accommodate for different 
cigarette strengths and physical parameters.
    12. The major sources of method variability, e.g., include sources 
from the smoking machine or regimen, sample preparation, separation, 
and detection of different tobacco product types and strengths.
    13. The specific method challenges and limitations when testing NNN 
and NNK.
    14. The differences in separation, detection, and limits of 
detection/quantitation when comparing liquid chromatography/mass 
spectrometry and gas chromatography/thermal energy analyzer for TSNA 
analysis.

C. PAHs in Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette 
Smoke

    For the PAHs benzo[a]pyrene, naphthalene, chrysene,

[[Page 33426]]

benz[j]aceanthrylene, benzo[a]anthracene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, 
benzo[k]fluoranthene, benzo[c]phenanthrene, cyclopenta[cd]pyrene, 
dibenz[a,h]anthracene, dibenzo[a,e]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, 
dibenzo[a,i]pyrene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene, and 5-
methylchrysene:
    15. The different extraction steps used when analyzing PAHs in 
tobacco filler, smokeless tobacco, and cigarette smoke particulate and 
any applicable cleanup techniques used.
    16. The optimal solvents, extraction solutions, standards, and 
reference tobacco product(s) needed during the extraction of PAHs from 
tobacco filler or, as applicable, a Cambridge filter pad.
    17. The rationale for using isotopically labeled internal standards 
instead of targeted surrogates or external standards for PAHs. The 
number of isotopically labeled internal standards needed to calculate 
the amount of PAHs in a sample.
    18. The challenges with isotopically labeled internal standards, 
including: (a) The commercial availability of internal standards or 
their analogs; (b) individual vs. mixture of internal standards, cost 
of internal standards; (c) deuterated vs. \13\ C labeled internal 
standards; and (d) concerns of proton exchange with deuterated labeled 
internal standards.
    19. The typical concentration ranges for each of the PAHs listed in 
this document and any potential method adjustments to accommodate for 
different cigarette strengths and physical parameters.
    20. The major sources of method variability, e.g., include sources 
from the smoking machine or regimen, sample preparation, separation, 
and detection of different tobacco product types and strengths.
    21. The different methods necessary to separate and detect for 
PAHs. Provide the number of methods and steps typically used for each 
from extraction to detection.
    22. The specific method challenges and limitations when analyzing 
testing PAHs, including: (a) Isomer separation and identification, (b) 
effects of tobacco blend, and (c) low vs. high molecular weight PAHs 
(volatility and sensitivity).
    23. The differences in separation, detection, and limits of 
detection/quantitation when comparing gas chromatography/mass 
spectrometry, liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection, and liquid 
chromatography/mass spectrometry for PAH analysis.

D. General Method Testing for TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs in Tobacco Filler 
(Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke

    24. The solution stability for prepared solutions and procedures to 
ensure their integrity.
    25. The typical storage conditions and shelf life (i.e., expiration 
dates) for tobacco product standards and samples.
    26. The standard, reference, or known sample solutions used as 
blanks or for quality control (QC), working, and check standards when 
testing TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs.
    27. The system suitability and acceptance criteria for each test 
method. The discussion may include calibration, QC, working, 
bracketing, and verification standards, confirmation ion ratio for mass 
spectrometry, chromatographic parameters (i.e., retention times, 
tailing factor, or peak resolution), injector precision, and blanks.
    28. The critical system suitability parameters that are critical 
when testing TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs.
    29. The actions taken when any system suitability criterion fails, 
including standards, QC, and subsequent sample analyses.
    30. The typical run sequence when testing samples for TNCO, TSNAs, 
and PAHs.
    31. The equations to calculate sample concentrations for TNCO, 
TSNAs, and PAHs.
    32. Examples of chromatograms of reference standards and for 
measured TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs in tobacco products.

E. Validation or Method Performance for TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs in 
Tobacco Filler (Cigarette, RYO, Smokeless) and Cigarette Smoke

    33. The specific details when evaluating each validation parameter, 
which may include limit of detection, limit of quantification, method 
detection limit, accuracy, recovery, linearity, range, precision 
(repeatability), and specificity.
    34. The determination of each criterion for each validation 
parameter when evaluating TNCO, TSNAs, and PAHs.
    35. The steps taken when validation parameter criteria are not met.
    36. The validation parameters that are performed with reference 
tobacco products or standards.
    37. The types and strengths of tobacco product samples used during 
validation and method development.
    38. The process taken to revalidate a test method when changes to 
the method (i.e., solvent, extraction method, or column) are made.
    39. The validation process when using a rotary and linear smoking 
machine with a non-intense and intense smoking regimen.
    40. The robustness or ruggedness tests that are conducted for 
extraction efficiency, solution stability, and small changes in 
instrument parameters.

III. Transcripts

    Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is available, it 
will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at 
the Division of Dockets Management (see Comments). A transcript will 
also be available in either hard copy or on CD-ROM, after submission of 
a Freedom of Information request. Written requests are to be sent to 
Division of Freedom of Information (HFI-35), Office of Management 
Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 6-30, 
Rockville, MD 20857.

    Dated: May 24, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-13084 Filed 6-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.