Tribal Consultation and Coordination Policy for the U.S. Department of Commerce, 33331-33339 [2013-13052]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
compensated executives) must be
reported by the Recipient (if the
Recipient meets the criteria under 2 CFR
part 170) to https://www.sam.gov/
portal/public/SAM/by the end of the
month following the month in which
the award was made.
c. The Total Compensation of the
Subrecipient’s Executives (5 most
highly compensated executives) must be
reported by the Subrecipient (if the
Subrecipient meets the criteria under 2
CFR part 170) to the Recipient by the
end of the month following the month
in which the subaward was made.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. Web site: https://www.usda.gov/rus/
water. The Rural Utilities Service Web
site maintains up-to-date resources and
contact information for the RFP.
B. Phone: (202) 720–9589.
C. Fax: (202) 690–0649.
D. Email: mailto:
JoyceM.Taylor@wdc.usda.gov.
E. Main point of contact: Joyce M.
Taylor, Community Programs Specialist,
Water and Environmental Programs,
Water Programs Division, Rural Utilities
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Dated: May 10, 2013.
John Charles Padalino,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service
.
[FR Doc. 2013–13069 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA).
Title: State and Local Implementation
Grant Program Application
Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 0660–0038.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a currently approved
information collection).
Number of Respondents: 56.
Average Hours per Response:
Application, 10 hours; Quarterly
reports, 4 hours.
Burden Hours: 1,456.
Needs and Uses: The Middle Class
Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012
(Act, Pub. L. 112–96, 126 Stat. 156
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
(2012).) was signed by the President on
February 22, 2012. The Act meets a
long-standing priority of the
Administration, as well as a critical
national infrastructure need, to create a
single, nationwide interoperable public
safety broadband network (PSBN) that
will, for the first time, allow police
officers, fire fighters, emergency medical
service professionals, and other public
safety officials to effectively
communicate with each other across
agencies and jurisdictions. Public safety
workers have long been hindered in
their ability to respond in a crisis
situation because of incompatible
communications networks and often
outdated communications equipment.
The Act establishes the First
Responder Network Authority (FirstNet)
as an independent authority within
NTIA and authorizes it to take all
actions necessary to ensure the design,
construction, and operation of a
nationwide PSBN, based on a single,
national network architecture.
The Act also charges NTIA with
establishing a grant program to assist
state, regional, tribal, and local
jurisdictions with identifying, planning,
and implementing the most efficient
and effective means to use and integrate
the infrastructure, equipment, and other
architecture associated with the
nationwide PSBN to satisfy the wireless
broadband and data services needs of
their jurisdictions. NTIA will use the
collection of information to ensure that
States applying for SLIGP grants meet
eligibility and programmatic
requirements as well as to monitor and
evaluate how SLIGP recipients are
achieving the core purposes of the
program established by the Act.
NTIA sought emergency review of the
SLIGP request to begin the application
process in the first quarter of calendar
year 2013 and awarding grants was
estimated no later than June 1, 2013. In
order to meet this deadline, NTIA
requested clearance for the application
and reporting requirements by
December 31, 2012 in order to: (1)
Ensure applicants have reasonable
notice of the federal funding
opportunity; (2) provide applicants
sufficient time to complete and submit
their applications; and (3) allow NTIA
adequate time to properly execute the
application review process and make
the awards.
This request was approved on January
7, 2013; approval ends on July 31, 2013.
The publication of this notice allows
NTIA to begin the process to extend the
approval for the standard three years.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Frequency: Annually and quarterly.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33331
Respondent’s Obligation:
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
jjessup@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of the publication to
Nicholas Fraser, OMB Desk Officer,
FAX number (202) 395–5167, or via the
Internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: May 29, 2013.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–13118 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket Number: 120530127–2127–02]
Tribal Consultation and Coordination
Policy for the U.S. Department of
Commerce
Department of Commerce.
Notice of Final Policy
Statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In compliance with Executive
Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (November 6, 2000), the
Department of Commerce (Department)
adopts the following Tribal Consultation
and Coordination policy statement. This
policy establishes the manner in which
the Department works with federallyrecognized Indian tribes when
developing Department policies that
have tribal implications. The policy
reaffirms the unique government-togovernment relationship that exists
between Indian tribes and the
Department. The Department continues
its commitment to support tribes in the
development of strong and stable
economies able to participate in today’s
national and global marketplace. The
notice also summarizes comments
received on the draft Tribal
Consultation and Coordination policy
statement published in the Federal
Register on July 3, 2012 (77 FR 39464)
and the Department’s response to these
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
an electronic copy of the final policy
should be directed to Dee Alexander,
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
33332
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
Senior Advisor on Native American
Affairs, Office of Legislative and
Intergovernmental Affairs, U.S.
Department of Commerce Room 5422,
1401 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20233, telephone (202)
482–0789.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
E.O. 13175, ‘‘requires Federal
agencies to have an accountable process
to ensure meaningful and timely input
by tribal officials in developing policies
that have tribal implications, and are
responsible for strengthening the
government-to-government relationship
between the United States and Indian
tribes.’’
On November 5, 2009, President
Barack Obama reaffirmed the
government-to-government relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribal governments in a White
House memorandum. Among other
things, this memorandum acknowledges
that Indian tribes exercise inherent
sovereign powers over their members
and territory. The memorandum also
acknowledges that the United States
continues to work with Indian tribes on
a government-to-government basis to
address issues concerning Indian tribal
self-government, tribal trust resources,
and Indian tribal treaty and other rights.
This final policy statement is
intended only for internal management
purposes and does not create any right,
benefit, or responsibility enforceable
against the United States, its agencies,
entities, or instrumentalities, its officers
or employees, or any other person. The
Department believes this policy
responds to President Obama’s
memorandum and builds upon and
expands the principles expressed in the
Department’s previous policy,
‘‘American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy of the Department of Commerce,’’
promulgated on March 30, 1995. The
Policy incorporates the requirements of
E.O. No. 13175, and the Office of
Management and Budget Memorandum,
‘‘Guidance for Implementing E.O.
13175, ‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments.’’’
Summary of Comments Received in
Response to the Draft Consultation and
Coordination Policy
On July 3, 2012, the Department
published a notice and request for
comments on a draft ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination Policy for the U.S.
Department of Commerce’’ policy
statement in the Federal Register (77 FR
39464). The Department received letters
from 15 different entities, with
approximately 48 unique comments in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
response to the draft policy statement. A
summary of comments received and the
Department’s responses to these
comments are presented below. The
Department also received seven
comments and recommendations not
specific to the policy principles. The
notice also includes comments and the
Department’s responses to those
comments received from two national
webinars held on September 12, 2012
and September 19, 2012.
General Comments and
Recommendations
Comment 1: The broad statement in
the background section of the July 3
notice, that the policy ‘‘may not apply
to a particular situation based upon the
circumstances,’’ should be replaced
with a narrow description of the
situations to which the policy would
apply.
Response: Because the statement was
included in the general background
information in the Federal Register
notice, it is not a part of the
Department’s policy request for
comments. Therefore, no changes to the
policy have been made in response to
this comment.
Comment 2: Include in the final tribal
consultation policy and supporting
information a (1) description of efforts
made to coordinate and consult with
tribal officials on the draft policy; (2)
complete summary of public comments,
especially from tribal members; and (3)
description of how the Department has
addressed or incorporated comments
into the final policy.
Response: The Department included
the requested information in this notice.
Comment 3: The comprehensive
Consultation and Coordination Policy
should include overseeing consultation
efforts between state, tribal and local
entities and independent entities, such
as the First Responder Network
Authority (FirstNet).
Response: The Department will not
implement this policy in such a manner
as to conflict with statutory
requirements. The Middle Class Tax
Relief Act and Job Creation Act of 2012,
which establishes FirstNet, describes a
statutory method for consultation
between FirstNet and State, local, and
tribal entities. The Department, in
coordination with FirstNet, will
determine the policy’s applicability to
other similar authorities as necessary.
Comment 4: Clarify the Department’s
role in coordinating with other federal
agencies, and increase interagency
coordination and collaboration to
increase government efficiency and
accountability.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Response: The Department will
determine the scope and timing of any
required interagency coordination as
circumstances indicate.
Comment 5: Amend the policy to
apply to Fishery Management Councils.
Response: Council meetings are a
critical part of the fishery management
planning process and are the first and
earliest point of development for fishery
management policy. It is most beneficial
to Tribes, Councils and National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) if there is early
and active participation by Indian
Tribes and Alaska Natives in these fora.
NOAA strongly encourages Councils to
discuss and work with Tribes to address
their concerns while developing fishery
conservation and management measures
under the Magnuson Stevens Act,
(MSA) 16 U.S.C. 1800 et seq. Thus,
while it is NOAA’s—and not the
Councils’—responsibility to consult
with federally recognized tribes under
E.O. 13175, the Councils’ current and
future early engagement will facilitate
and enhance tribal input into NOAA’s
rulemaking processes.
Comment 6: The policy should clarify
that the Department’s agency research
activities are subject to the policy.
Response: Research activities
conducted by a Department’s bureau or
agency are subject to this Policy and
E.O. 13175 whenever such activities
involve actions or policies that have
tribal implications. The Department
complies with existing statutory and
regulatory consultation obligations.
Comment 7: How will the new policy
affect the status of existing comanagement agreements with the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS)?
Response: The new policy has no
effect on co-management agreements
established under section 119 of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act. NMFS
will continue to work with Alaska
Native organizations under comanagement agreements. Such comanagement does not constitute, nor is
it a substitute for, government-togovernment consultation as required by
E.O. 13175.
Comments to Section 1: Introduction
Comment 8: Add more language to the
Introduction Section of the policy
statement that reflects tribal sovereignty
and tribes’ rights to self-determination
and self-government.
Response: The Department adopts the
recommendation and has added the
sentence to Section 1.01 stating, ‘‘The
Department recognizes Indian tribal
self-government and supports tribal
sovereignty and self-determination.’’
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
Comment 9: Include the term ‘‘on a
pre-decisional basis’’ in Section 1.01.
The term will ensure that the
consultation occurs before a policy is
changed.
Response: The Department does not
adopt this recommendation. The term
‘‘pre-decisional’’ is a term of art, and is
not appropriate for this policy. The
Department adheres to Section 3 of E.O.
13175, which includes the timing of
consultation with the Department or its
operating units, as stated in Section 7.02
of this policy.
Comment 10: Reference Executive
Orders and Secretarial Orders in the
Introduction Section of the policy.
Response: The Department refers to
E.O. 13175 in Section 1.04 of this final
policy. This policy does not refer to
Secretarial Orders because the
Department has joint Secretarial Orders
with the Department of the Interior to
implement provisions of the
Endangered Species Act which only
applies to specific Department
components. It is not appropriate to
include existing Secretarial Orders as
part of this policy.
Comment 11: Include the relevant
‘‘regulations, statutes, Presidential
memoranda, and Executive Orders’’ in
the Introduction section of the policy
statement.
Response: The Department adopts this
comment and has added the following
sentence to the end of Section 1.04:
‘‘This Policy is to be construed
consistent with Federal statutes,
regulations, Presidential memoranda,
Executive Orders, and other relevant
Federal legal authorities.’’
Comment 12: Substitute the word
‘‘input’’ in the first sentence of Section
1.04 with ‘‘participation.’’
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The term
‘‘input’’ is consistent with Section 5(a)
of E.O. 13175.
Comment 13: Include a new subsection in the Introduction Section of
the policy with the following wording;
‘‘The Department recognizes and
respects the diversity of Indian tribes
and understands that they are
culturally, traditionally, and
administratively different. This
diversity makes it impossible for any
federal agency to make the sole decision
regarding whether or in what manner it
is appropriate to consult with tribes.
The only entities that know enough
about individual tribes to make that
determination are the tribes themselves.
Therefore, consultation can be initiated
by either the Tribes or the Department.’’
Response: Section 7.01 of this policy
provides for consultation initiated by
either a Tribe or the Department.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
Comments to Section 2: Background
Comment 14: The policy should
clarify whether it replaces the 1995
policy. If it does not, then include the
10 enumerated principles and expand
the principles in the new policy.
Response: To be clear, this new policy
replaces the 1995 policy and builds and
expands upon the principles in the 1995
policy, and it incorporates the
requirements of E.O. 13175 and
Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Tribal
Consultation,’’ 2009 Daily Comp. Pres.
Docs. 887 (November 5, 2009). The
Department also references the 1995
American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy of the Department of Commerce
in Section 2.01 of this policy.
Comment 15: Include E.O. 13175’s
policymaking criteria with explanation
of how DOC will apply them when
‘‘formulating and implementing policies
that have tribal implications.’’
Response: This recommendation is
addressed in Section 2.01 of the policy,
which incorporates E.O. 13175,
Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Tribal
Consultation,’’ and the Office of
Management and Budget’s
implementing guidance of July 30, 2010.
Comment 16: Provide additional
guidance on the Department’s process
for determining whether policies have
tribal implications, including examples
of past Department actions that were
subject to consultations. Provide
detailed guidance on how the
Department will conduct consultations
and prepare tribal impact statements for
regulations with tribal impacts that
impose costs, are not required by
legislation, and preempt tribal law.
Response: The Department does not
adopt this recommendation. This policy
is intended to provide high-level
guidance to operating units to
implement depending on their
circumstances and governing legal
authorities. The policy also provides the
Department with the necessary
flexibility to ensure its consultations are
as effective as possible.
Comments to Section 3: Authority
The Department received no
comments to Section 3.
Comments to Section 4: Definitions
Comment 17: Amend the definition
4.01, ‘‘Consultation’’ to include an
accountable process, which enables
Tribal officials to participate in Federal
decision-making before an agency takes
an action, or commits to a decision to
consider an action or policy with Tribal
implications. Note that consultation is
not a single act of communication, but
consists of multiple steps which
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33333
culminate in an outcome that reflects
the views, needs and objectives of both
Federal and Tribal participants.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The
definition in this final policy is
consistent with E.O. 13175. Section 7 of
this policy also addresses the elements
of consultation including means of
communication, exchange of
information, and notice.
Comment 18: Amend the definition of
‘‘Consultation’’ to incorporate the
following key principles: Consultation
is a process which enables the tribes to
participate in federal decision making
before an agency takes an action, or
commits to a decision to consider an
action or policy with tribal implications.
Consultation is not a single act of
communication but rather a process
involving multiple steps which
culminate in an outcome that reflects
the views, needs and objectives of both
federal and tribal participants.
Consultation may be initiated by tribal
governments to discuss and exchange
information on a government-togovernment basis. Consultation can be
formal with established time lines and
required publications, or less formal
through means such as teleconferencing.
Consultation is triggered when the
Department considers ‘‘Policies that
have tribal implications,’’ as that term is
defined in E.O. 13175, or when the
Department considers proposals for
regulations, rulemaking, legislation,
guidance, policy formulation or actions
that may have a substantial direct effect
on one or more tribes, on the
relationship between tribes and the
federal government, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the tribes and
federal government.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The final
policy’s definition is consistent with
E.O. 13175; moreover, Section 7 of this
policy addresses the elements of
consultation including means of
communication, exchange of
information, and notice.
Comment 19: Add to the definition of
‘‘consultation’’ the term ‘‘actions’’ in
addition to ‘‘policies.’’
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The term
‘‘policies that have tribal implications’’
is the term for actions requiring the
procedures described in the E.O. 13175
and therefore, this Department policy
implements E.O. 13175.
Comment 20: The policy should
include Alaska Native Corporation in
the definition of ‘‘Indian Tribe,’’ or
adopt a parallel formal consultation
policy for Alaska Native Corporations,
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33334
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
per the Congressional direction to
Federal Agencies in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2004, Pub. L.
108–199, Div. H, Section 161, which is
codified as a note to 25 U.S.C. § 450.
Response: The Department has added
the following definition for Alaska
Native Corporations and will include
ANCs in the policy consistent with 25
U.S.C. § 450 note on ‘‘Consultation with
Alaska Native Corporations: 07. ‘‘Alaska
Native Corporation,’’ pursuant to 43
U.S.C. §§ 1602 et seq., any Regional
Corporation, any Village Corporation,
any Urban Corporation, and any Group
Corporation as defined in, or
established pursuant to, the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act.
The Department also added a new
Section 8. ‘‘Consultation with Alaska
Native Corporations,’’ to the Policy,
which reads as follows:
01. In 2004, through two consolidated
appropriations acts, Congress required
federal agencies to consult with Alaska
Native Corporations on the same basis
as federally recognized Indian Tribes
under E.O. 13175 (Public Law 108–199,
118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L.
108–447, 118 Stat. 3267).
02. The Department interprets the
term ‘‘Alaska Native Corporations’’ in
this requirement to mean ‘‘Native
Corporations’’ as that term is defined
under the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) of 1971.
Congress created regional, village, and
urban corporations to manage the lands,
funds, and other assets conveyed to
Alaska Natives by ANCSA. There are 13
regional corporations and over 200
village corporations in Alaska. The
village corporations generally represent
shareholders in villages associated with
the 229 federally recognized tribes in
Alaska. Most Alaska Native Corporation
shareholders also are members of a
federally recognized tribe in Alaska.
03. The Department will implement
the requirement to consult with Alaska
Native Corporations in a manner as
close as possible to consultations with
federally recognized tribes in Alaska,
while recognizing the important
differences between sovereign tribal
governments and the federal trust
responsibility to those tribal
governments and corporations obligated
to maximize financial returns to
shareholders. Alaska Native
Corporations were established to
operate as for-profit enterprises, and
may not necessarily represent the same
perspective or interests as the tribes.
Consultation and coordination with the
corporations will follow the same
process as described in this Policy for
tribes, with the following exceptions:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
a. Consultations with Alaska Native
Corporations will occur on a
‘‘government-to-corporation’’ basis,
rather than ‘‘government-togovernment’’ basis to reflect the
distinction between sovereign
governments and corporate entities.
b. Government-to-corporation
consultations will occur with
appropriate adjustments given the
unique status, structure, and interests of
Alaska Native Corporations.
Comment 21: Clarify whether the
policy applies to the Office of the
Secretary as well as to its operating
units, and identify the organizations to
which the policy does not apply. Also,
require the implementation of
procedures at each bureau and agency
level to allow the bureaus/agencies to
determine when a policy has tribal
implications, and allow the Tribes to
consult on the various agency-level
policies.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. This policy
is intended to provide high-level
guidance to the Department’s bureaus to
allow them to implement the policy
depending on their circumstances and
governing legal authorities. Section 6 of
the policy allows, but does not require,
the development of operating level,
bureau and agency, procedures. The
policy applies to the Office of the
Secretary, as implemented by the Tribal
Consultation Official, see Section 5.01.
Comment 22: On definition 4.04,
‘‘policies that have tribal implications’’:
a. Tribal consultation officials should
interpret the term ‘‘policies that have
tribal implications’’ broadly so that the
term applies to more than just
regulations and legislative action. The
policy should clarify that the phrase in
section 7.02.a ‘‘other policy statements
and actions’’ is intended to apply
broadly to include all written statements
of policy or actions that have the
potential to affect tribal rights and
interests.
b. Tribal consultations should also be
triggered by any Department action that
affects American Indian, Alaska Native
and Native American tribes, not just
formal Department policies.
c. Include language about the timing
of consultation. Amend the policy to
include the following or similar
language from the 1995 policy: ‘‘work
with tribal governments prior to
implementing any action.’’
Response: The subject phrase is a
term defined in E.O. 13175 and applies
to ‘‘actions’’ as well as policies and
regulations.
Comment 23: Amend definition 4.05
‘‘Tribal Officials,’’ to read as follows:
‘‘‘Tribal officials’ means an elected or
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
duly appointed Tribal leader or official
delegate, designated in writing by a
Tribe, or a duly authorized
representative of an authorized
intertribal organization.’’ Also, include
official delegates who are designated as
such by their tribes to ensure that
individuals who have been authorized
to consult on behalf of their tribe will
be accorded the same status as elected
or duly appointed officials.
Response: The Department used the
definition from E.O. 13175 for ‘‘Tribal
officials,’’ which includes ‘‘duly
appointed officials,’’ meaning that a
delegated representative of a tribal
government will be recognized as an
appropriate ‘‘tribal official.’’
Comments to Section 5: Roles and
Responsibilities
Comment 24: The tribal consultation
official should develop protocols, SOPs
and, as appropriate, a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) for formal and
informal consultations. These
documents would establish the means
for providing and exchanging
information between the Department
and tribal governments.
Response: The Department does not
adopt this recommendation. This policy
is intended to provide high-level
guidance to the Department’s bureaus
and agencies to allow them to
implement the policy depending on
their circumstances and governing legal
authorities. The Department intends
that operating units address such
procedures in their handbooks or other
guidance as appropriate.
Comment 25: The Department should
encourage each of its bureaus and
agencies to allocate funding toward
Tribal consultation activities, including
consultation itself, staff training, and
other associated activities.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The
Department will encourage the
operating units to work within existing
resources to comply with E.O. 13175.
Comment 26: Tribal officials situated
at headquarters are poorly positioned to
implement the meaningful and timely
consultation process anticipated by E.O.
13175. National consultation officials
have little experience on the regional
issues and insufficient time to focus on
the issues to effectively monitor and
coordinate. A regional consultation
official would have more regular contact
with the tribes and would be able to
screen issues and provide advance
notice of impending issues. Therefore,
change Section 5.02.b to require the
designation of consultation coordinators
at the regional level, particularly within
operating units such as NOAA. Also,
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
give the tribes significant input into the
selection process for the designated
national and regional consultation
officials.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. Section
5.02.b of this policy allows operating
units to delegate authority.
Comment 27: The Department’s tribal
consultation official or designee should
certify to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) that draft final
regulations or proposed regulations with
tribal implications comply with EO
13175. A tribal consultation summary
report is part of the required annual
update to OMB that each agency must
provide.
Response: The Department added a
paragraph under Section 5.01; the new
paragraph reads: d. The Tribal
Consultation Official has the
responsibility for submitting an annual
report to OMB pursuant section 7(a) of
E.O. 13175.
Comment 28: Make it clear how, and
when, each operating unit designates
officials to consult with the tribes.
Explain how tribes can open lines of
communication with the designated
officials.
Response: Pursuant to Section 5.02.a
of the policy, each operating unit is
responsible for designating an official at
the operating unit level and for the
timing of that designation.
Comment 29: Clarify the term
‘‘periodic dialogue’’ in Section 5.01.c, or
replace that phrase with the term
‘‘meaningful dialogue’’ or ‘‘biannually’’
to give more guidance on what the term
means in the context of the policy.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The phrase
‘‘periodic dialogue’’ is intended to allow
flexibility in the regular review of this
policy’s implementation.
Comment 30: Section 5.02.a. of the
Policy states that the head of each
operating unit within the Department
will designate an official to ensure
compliance with the Policy. As written,
there is no timeframe for this
designation in the policy. Institute a
timeframe for this process. Additionally,
some units already have an experienced
designated official, while other units’
designated officials may have little to no
experience in tribal consultation.
Increase interdepartmental cooperation,
in addition to providing a timeline for
designating the officials, to provide
certainty and continuity for Tribes as
they navigate the new policy and
interact with federal officials across the
Department.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. The
Department determined that these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
responsibilities are best addressed at the
operating unit level to allow each
operating unit to assess its needs to
support interactions and relationships
with tribes.
Comment 31: Add the following
responsibilities to the tribal consultation
official or designated officials in the
operating units Section: Responding to
inquiries from tribes about a specific
consultation—past, ongoing, or
proposed; responding to inquiries about
the consultation process in general;
receiving requests from tribes seeking to
initiate consultation; coordinating to
identify and screen for potential
consultation issues; preserving and
maintaining complete consultation
records; assisting tribal governments
seeking to access consultation records;
and receiving post-consultation
complaints, objections, and alleged
inconsistencies.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. This policy
is intended to provide high-level
guidance to the Department’s bureaus
and agencies to allow them to
implement the policy depending on
their circumstances and governing legal
authorities. The Department intends
that operating units address this matter
in their handbooks or other guidance as
appropriate.
Comment 32: Establish tribal liaison
positions to implement the consultation
policy, and to encourage agencies to
allocate funding for tribal consultations.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation, and
encourages operating units to work with
existing resources and staff to comply
with E.O. 13175.
Comments to Section 6: Training and
Guidance
Comment 33: The focus of the
consultation in most cases should be at
the local level; however, it is critical
that bureau or agency officials at the
headquarters level with no background
in tribal relations be properly trained in
the consultation process.
Response: This policy provides for
training in Section 6.01.
Comment 34: Section 6.02 provides
that ‘‘each operating unit may develop
and issue tribal consultation guidance.’’
Agencies should be required to develop
Tribal consultation guidance. This
guidance should be developed under
supervision of the Tribal Consultation
Official to ensure that its content is
uniform across the Department’s
operating units.
Response: The Department addresses
this recommendation in Section 6.02 of
the Policy which permits operating
units to develop tribal consultation
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33335
guidance provided that the guidance is
consistent with DAO 218–8 and is
reviewed by the Tribal Consultation
Official.
Comments to Section 7: Consultation
Comment 35: The term ‘‘reasonable
effort’’ in Section 7 is unclear. Clarify
that the Department will confirm receipt
of a tribal request for consultation
within 30 days, or even 45 days. Tribes
believe that there are few circumstances
where the Department would not be
able to accommodate a request, and urge
the Department to conduct face-to-face
consultations with tribes.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendations. Operating
units may have specific time constraints
imposed by statute or circumstances,
and this policy is intended to provide
them with the flexibility to
accommodate those constraints.
Comment 36: It is important for the
consultation process to retain the
requirement that it is a government-togovernment interaction. The
consultation process must also involve
elected tribal officials unless otherwise
approved by the tribe.
Response: This comment is addressed
in the policy definition of ‘‘Tribal
officials,’’ adopted from Section 1(d) of
E.O. 13175.
Comment 37: The Department should
include in the policy further guidance
indicating standards for determining
which forms of consultation are
appropriate in various circumstances,
and allow the tribes to consult on these
standards.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. This policy
is intended to provide high-level
guidance to allow operating units to
implement the policy depending on
their circumstances and governing legal
authorities. The Department intends
that operating units address details of
their respective consultation process in
their handbooks or other guidance as
appropriate.
Comment 38: Coordination with the
tribes should not be limited to formal
consultation, and a variety of
consultation types should be further
defined in sub-section 01. Consultation
types could include informal
discussions with tribal leaders, meetings
with individual tribes, listening
sessions, and formal consultations. Add
as the last section to sub-section 01:
‘‘Ultimately the consultation process is
to entail an informed discussion of the
proposed federal policy and associated
tribal concerns between the designated
Tribal Consultation Official and tribal
officials.’’
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
33336
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
Response: The Department adopts this
recommendation and has added the
following language to the end of Section
7.01: Ultimately, the consultation
process is to entail an informed
discussion of the proposed federal
policy and associated tribal concerns
between the designated Tribal
Consultation Official and tribal officials.
Comment 39: Develop a tribal liaison
position for the Alaska region. Tribal
liaisons should be trained in how to
conduct tribal consultations to help
facilitate tribal-agency relationships.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation to develop a
tribal liaison position for the Alaska
region. This comment has been
forwarded to NOAA for its
consideration.
Comment 40: The phrase ‘‘reasonable
effort’’ in Section 7.02.b. is unclear, and
should either be removed and replaced
with language clarifying the specific
time frame that the Department
considers reasonable.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation to remove
the term ‘‘reasonable effort’’ because
consultations are intended to reflect a
relationship between the operating unit
and the tribe, taking into account the
resources and mission of the operating
unit. Some operating units have specific
time constraints imposed by statute or
other circumstances, and this policy is
intended to provide those units with
sufficient flexibility to accommodate
those parameters.
Comment 41: Add to end of last
sentence in Section 7.02.b. the following
language: ‘‘prior to substantive decision
points and/or final action’’ and include
that ‘‘the timing of consultation is to
allow for the substantive consideration
of tribal input and concerns before
finalizing a decision on federal policies,
regulations, or legislation.’’
Response: The Department adopts the
recommendation in part and has added
the following language to the end of
subsection b.: Exchange of Information.
The Department and operating units
will make a reasonable effort to identify
and provide timely and accurate
information for consultation prior to
substantive decision or final action.
Comment 42: Section 7.02.c. should
include a statement that the Department
will clearly notify tribes of events such
as meetings that it considers to be
consultations, and that the Department
will do so within 45 or 90 days prior to
the consultation. The Department
should seek tribal participation in its
deliberative process about the necessity
of a proposed action.
Response: The Department will advise
its operating units to provide 45 days
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
advanced notice of any invitation to
conduct a consultation, or to provide
notice at the earliest time practicable.
Such notices will include any relevant
materials to facilitate discussion. This
response does not supersede any
existing legal authorities or
responsibilities of the operating units.
Comment 43: Communication to and
from rural Alaska can be difficult, and
the Department should follow up on
correspondence to Tribes and Tribal
entities. Response: The final policy
addresses follow-up notices to tribal
officials in Section 7.02.
Comment 44: The phrase ‘‘when
practical’’ in Sections 7.01, 7.02.b and
7.02.d is unclear, and the Department
should amend the section to clarify that
the Department will provide tribes with
a specific amount of time to prepare for
consultations and submit views, and
will be flexible about the time allowed.
Response: The Department agrees
with the recommendation to provide
Tribes adequate time to prepare for
consultation as well as relevant
materials to facilitate and submit their
views, and will advise its operating
units to develop consultation materials,
as appropriate. In addition, the
Department has added the following
language to Section 7.01 Consultation/
Consultation Process: ‘‘The Tribal
Consultation Official or the head of each
operating unit, as applicable, will treat
a request for consultation from a tribal
official in an expedited fashion and
provide a written response confirming
receipt of the request.’’
Comment 45: For Section 7.e., when
a consultation occurs between the
Department or its operating units and
Tribal officials, the Department or
operating unit should provide the Tribal
officials with a formal, written
communication that summarizes the
consultation, and responds to the issues
and concerns, if any, identified during
consultation. Tribes should be able to
agree to the accuracy of the summaries
of the tribes’ position in the
consultation. The follow-up
communications should be transmitted
within 30 days of the consultation. They
should also specifically indicate
whether the Department accepts the
tribes’ position, or include an
explanation of the Department’s
position. The Tribal Consultation
Official or head of each operating unit
conducting a consultation should also
maintain documentation addressing the
consultation, tribal concerns, and
recommendations in conformance with
applicable records retention schedules.
Additionally, the policy should
acknowledge that Tribes are more
familiar with their local environment
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and, thus, the policy should clarify that
the Tribes possess unique knowledge.
The policy should also allow the Tribes
to initiate consultations whenever there
is a potential for their rights and
interests to be affected. The consultation
process should also be timely and
initiated early in the decision making
process to allow the tribe to have access
to information about the proposed
regulation or policy. Regular
communication between the
Department and a Tribe is an essential
precursor to the consultation process;
consultation should be as a matter of
course and not just when ‘‘practical.’’
The policy should also distinguish
between regular communications, calls,
site visits, and participation in events
and informal meetings, which are not
intended to serve as the formal
negotiation component of the
government-to-government consultation
process.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation for a
specified timeframe to submit a written
summary of the consultation. Section
7.2.e. of the policy states that ‘‘the
Department or operating unit will
provide the Tribal officials with a
formal, written communication that
summarizes the consultation, and
responds to the issues and concerns, if
any, identified during consultation.’’
The Department expects operating units
to address written consultation
summaries in their handbooks or other
guidance, as appropriate. Written
summaries are not intended to be used
to document regular communications
and interactions between Department
employees and Tribes; rather, these
written communications are part of the
consultation process.
Comment 46: A written summary of
consultation should include the Tribe’s
responses and should become part of
the official record on consultation
activities maintained by the operating
unit and the Department, and should
form the basis for a tribal impact
summary.
Response: E.O. 13175 requires a tribal
summary impact statement when an
agency (1) promulgates regulations that
have tribal implications, that impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and are not
required by statute, or (2) promulgates
regulations that have tribal implications
and that preempt tribal law.
The Department intends consultation
reporting to be a separate component of
all consultations, regardless of whether
they involve regulations. In response to
this comment, the Department has
added the following language as a new
subparagraph to 5.02.c. The head of
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
each operating unit will consult with
Tribes and prepare tribal summary
impact statements when promulgating
any regulations that have tribal
implications, that impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments, and that are not required
by statute; and when promulgating any
regulation that has tribal implications
and that preempts tribal law.
Comment 47: The Department should
distribute a follow-up report detailing
immediate and long-term actions to be
taken after consultations, and should
add language in Section 7.02.e. to the
effect that documentation includes any
proposal for Departmental follow-up
actions.
Response: The Department does not
adopt the recommendation. Section
7.02.e. sufficiently addresses this
request by requiring the Department or
operating unit to provide tribal officials
with ‘‘a formal written communication
that summarizes the consultation, and
responds to the issues and concerns, if
any, identified during the consultation.’’
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Changes to the Proposed Policy
The policy statement adopted in this
Notice differs from the proposed policy
statement as follows:
(a) Proposed policy Section No. 1,
‘‘Introduction,’’ subparagraphs 01. and
04. were modified in response to
comments.
(b) Proposed policy Section No. 2,
‘‘Background,’’ subparagraph 01. was
modified to include wording on
consultation with Alaska Native
Corporations in compliance with
existing law.
(c) Proposed policy Section No. 4,
‘‘Definitions,’’ subparagraph 03. was
modified to expressly state that the
definition of operating units includes all
bureaus and agencies in response to
comments.
(d) Proposed policy Section No. 4,
‘‘Definitions,’’ was modified to include
a definition for ‘‘Alaska Native
Corporation’’ in response to comments.
(e) Proposed policy Section No 5,
‘‘Roles and Responsibilities for
Consultation,’’ subsection 01. was
modified to include additional reporting
language in response to comments.
(f) Proposed policy Section No. 5,
‘‘Roles and Responsibilities for
Consultation,’’ subsection 02. was
modified in response to comments to
include additional responsibilities
language for the heads of operating
units.
(g) Proposed policy Consultation
Process Section No. 7, ‘‘Consultation
Process,’’ subparagraph 01. was
modified and includes additional
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
language relating to the purpose of
consultation.
(h) Proposed policy Consultation
Process Section No. 7, ‘‘Consultation
Process,’’ subparagraph 02 was modified
in response to comments received to
include additional language relating to
responses to requests for tribal
consultations.
(i) Proposed policy Section No. 8,
‘‘Implementation,’’ was renumbered to
Section No. 9.
(j) A new Section No. 8, ‘‘Consultation
with Alaska Native Corporations,’’ was
added to address the consultation with
Alaska Native Corporations.
The final Consultation and
Coordination Policy of the U.S.
Department of Commerce now reads as
follows:
Tribal Consultation and Coordination
Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce
Section 1. Introduction
01. This ‘‘Tribal Consultation and
Coordination Policy of the U.S.
Department of Commerce’’ (‘‘Tribal
Consultation Policy’’ or ‘‘Policy’’)
establishes the manner in which the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) works with Indian
tribes on a government-to-government
basis to build a durable relationship and
address issues concerning tribal selfgovernment, tribal trust resources, and
tribal treaty and other rights, as well as
support tribes in developing strong and
stable economies able to participate in
the national and global marketplace.
The Department recognizes Indian tribal
self-government and supports tribal
sovereignty and self-determination.
02. The Department recognizes the
Federal Government’s unique legal
relationship, as established in the
Constitution, statutes, treaties and
federal court decisions, between Tribal
governments and the Federal
Government.
03. The Department and operating
units will seek and promote cooperation
within the Department and with other
agencies that have related
responsibilities. The Department’s
mission encompasses many complex
issues where cooperation and mutual
consideration among governments
(federal, state, tribal, and local) are
essential. The Department and operating
units will promote intradepartmental
and interagency coordination and
cooperation to assist Tribal governments
in resolving issues requiring mutual
effort.
04. Executive Order (E.O.) No. 13175,
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments,’’ requires
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33337
federal agencies to have an accountable
process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by tribal officials in developing
policies that have tribal implications.
This Policy provides uniform standards
and methodology outlining consultation
procedures for all Department personnel
working with Tribal governments
regarding policies that have tribal
implications. This Policy is to be
construed consistent with Federal
statutes, regulations, Presidential
memoranda, Executive Orders, and
other relevant Federal legal authorities.
Section 2. Background
01. This Policy builds upon and
expands the principles expressed in the
‘‘American Indian and Alaska Native
Policy of the Department of Commerce,’’
promulgated by the Department on
March 30, 1995. The Tribal Consultation
Policy incorporates the requirements of
E.O. No. 13175; Presidential
Memorandum, ‘‘Tribal Consultation,’’
2009 Daily Comp. Pres. Docs. 887
(November 5, 2009); the Office of
Management and Budget Memorandum,
‘‘Guidance for Implementing E.O.
13175, ‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian tribal Governments;’ ’’ and
the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2004, Pub. L. 108–199, Div. H § 161, 118
Stat. 3, 452 (2004), as amended by
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005,
Pub. L. 108–447, Div. H., Title V § 518,
118 Stat. 2809, 3267, relating to
consultation with Alaska Native
Corporations.
02. This Policy is for internal
management only and shall not be
construed to grant or vest any right to
any party not otherwise granted or
vested by existing law or regulations.
Section 3. Authority
01. This Tribal Consultation Policy is
issued pursuant to the authority of 5
U.S.C. 301 and Department
Administrative Order (DAO) 218–8,
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments.’’ This
Policy shall have the same force and
effect as a DAO. Amendments
(substantive changes) or revisions
(corrections or updates) to this Policy
may be developed and issued by the
Department of Commerce Tribal
Consultation Official or the Secretary’s
designee in consultation with Tribal
governments.
Section 4. Definitions
01. ‘‘Consultation,’’ as defined in
Section 5 of E.O. No. 13175, refers to an
accountable process ensuring
meaningful and timely input from tribal
officials on Department policies that
have tribal implications.
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
33338
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
02. ‘‘Indian tribe (or Tribe),’’ as
defined in Section 1(b) of E.O. No.
13175, means an Indian or Alaska
Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo,
village, or community that the Secretary
of the Interior acknowledges to exist as
an Indian tribe pursuant to the Federally
Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of
1994, 25 U.S.C. 479a.
03. ‘‘Operating units,’’ as defined in
Section 3.c.1 of Department
Organization Order 1–1, are
organizational entities outside the Office
of the Secretary charged with carrying
out specified substantive functions (i.e.,
programs) of the Department. The
operating units are the components of
the Department through which most of
its substantive functions are carried out.
‘‘Operating units’’ includes all
Department bureaus and agencies.
04. ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications,’’ as defined in Section 1(a)
of E.O. No. 13175, refers to regulations,
legislative comments or proposed
legislation, and other policy statements
or actions that have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
05. ‘‘Tribal Consultation Official,’’ as
defined in Section 5(a) of E.O. No.
13175, means the designee of the
Secretary with principal responsibility
for the implementation of this Policy.
06. ‘‘Tribal officials,’’ as defined in
Section 1(d) of E.O. No. 13175, means
elected or duly appointed officials of
Indian tribal governments or authorized
intertribal organizations.
07. ‘‘Alaska Native Corporation,’’
pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1602 et seq., any
Regional Corporation, any Village
Corporation, any Urban Corporation,
and any Group Corporation as defined
in, or established pursuant to, the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
Section 5. Roles and Responsibilities
for Consultations
01. Department of Commerce Tribal
Consultation Official
a. The Tribal Consultation Official is
an individual in the Office of Legislative
and Intergovernmental Affairs (OLIA)
within the Office of the Secretary who
is duly appointed to act as a liaison
between the Secretary of Commerce and
Tribal officials. The Tribal Consultation
Official may delegate authority, as
necessary, to the head of each operating
unit. The Tribal Consultation Official
has primary responsibility for ensuring
compliance with DAO 218–8, this
Policy, and E.O. No. 13175, and is
responsible for tribal consultations and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
coordination for the Office of the
Secretary programs.
b. The Tribal Consultation Official has
responsibility for coordinating the
implementation of this Policy and DAO
218–8 within the Department and all
operating units.
c. The Tribal Consultation Official
will engage tribal officials in periodic
dialogue to discuss the Department’s
implementation of this Policy. The
dialogue will provide an opportunity for
tribal officials to assess policy
implementation, program delivery, and
discuss outreach and communication
efforts, and other issues.
d. The Tribal Consultation Official is
responsible for submitting an annual
report to OMB pursuant section 7(a) of
E.O. No. 13175.
02. Head of operating unit
Responsibilities
a. The head of each operating unit
will designate an official in the
headquarters office who has primary
responsibility for ensuring compliance
with this Policy within the operating
unit. Each operating unit’s designated
official will work with the Department
Tribal Consultation Official to ensure
coordination of tribal consultations, as
necessary. The designated official is
responsible for the development,
maintenance and internal distribution of
any guidance produced by the operating
unit in compliance with the
requirements of this Policy.
b. The head of each operating unit or
the designated official may delegate
authority to appropriate individuals
within the operating unit.
c. The head of each operating unit
will consult with Tribes and prepare
tribal summary impact statements when
promulgating any regulations that have
tribal implications, that impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, and that are
not required by statute; and when
promulgating any regulations that have
tribal implications and that preempt
tribal law.
Section 6. Training and Guidance
01. The Tribal Consultation Official
and the head of each operating unit will
ensure that personnel assisting with
tribal consultations have appropriate
training.
02. Each operating unit may develop
and issue tribal consultation guidance to
assist staff in preparing, reviewing and
managing the consultation process
within their respective operating units,
so long as:
a. The guidance is consistent with
DAO 218–8, and
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
b. The Department’s Tribal
Consultation Official reviews the
guidance.
Section 7. Consultation
01. The Consultation Process.
Consultation may take a variety of
forms. Implementing this Policy may
require a range of formal and informal
planning activities. The Department and
operating units’ consultation processes
may include one or more of the
following: meetings, letters, conference
calls, webinars, on-site visits, or
participation in regional and national
events. The Tribal Consultation Official
or the head of each operating unit, as
applicable, will make a reasonable effort
to accommodate a tribal request for
consultation. Ultimately, the
consultation process is to entail an
informed discussion of the proposed
federal policy and associated tribal
concerns between the designated Tribal
Consultation Official and tribal officials.
02. Elements of the Consultation
Process.
a. Ongoing communication shall be a
regular part of the government-togovernment relationship with tribal
governments. The Department and
operating units will engage in
meaningful dialogue with Tribes
regarding all policies that have tribal
implications.
b. Exchange of Information. The
Department and operating units will
make a reasonable effort to identify and
provide timely and accurate information
for consultation.
c. Notification. The Department and
operating units will notify Tribes of
policies that have tribal implications.
Follow-up may be necessary to ensure
the appropriate tribal official has
received the consultation notification
and accompanying documents. These
notifications do not replace or
supersede any notifications that are
required by statute or E.O. regarding
tribal consultations.
d. Consultation Planning. The
Department or operating units will
coordinate with tribal officials to plan
logistical considerations for the
consultation. The Department or
operating units will, when practical,
allow Tribes a reasonable amount of
time to prepare for consultation and
submit their views on policies that have
tribal implications. The Tribal
Consultation Official or the head of each
operating unit, as applicable, will treat
a request for consultation from a tribal
official in an expedited fashion and
provide a written response confirming
receipt of the request.
e. Written Communication and
Record-Keeping. When a consultation
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Notices
occurs between the Department or its
operating units and Tribal officials, the
Department or operating unit will
provide the Tribal officials with a
formal, written communication that
summarizes the consultation, and
responds to the issues and concerns, if
any, identified during consultation. The
Tribal Consultation Official or head of
each operating unit conducting a
consultation will maintain
documentation addressing the
consultation, tribal concerns, and
recommendations in conformance with
applicable records retention schedules.
Section 8. Consultation With Alaska
Native Corporations
01. In 2004, through two consolidated
appropriations acts, Congress required
federal agencies to consult with Alaska
Native Corporations on the same basis
as federally recognized Indian Tribes
under E.O. 13175 (Pub. L. 108–199, 118
Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108–
447, 118 Stat. 3267).
02. The Department interprets the
term ‘‘Alaska Native Corporations’’ in
this requirement to mean ‘‘Native
Corporations’’ as that term is defined
under the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (ANCSA) of 1971.
Congress created regional, village, and
urban corporations to manage the lands,
funds, and other assets conveyed to
Alaska Natives by ANCSA. There are 13
regional corporations and over 200
village corporations in Alaska. The
village corporations generally represent
shareholders in villages associated with
the 229 federally recognized tribes in
Alaska. Most Alaska Native Corporation
shareholders also are members of a
federally recognized tribe in Alaska.
03. The Department will implement
the requirement to consult with Alaska
Native Corporations in a manner as
close as possible to consultations with
federally recognized tribes in Alaska,
while recognizing the important
differences between sovereign tribal
governments and the federal trust
responsibility to those tribal
governments and corporations obligated
to maximize financial returns to
shareholders. Alaska Native
Corporations were established to
operate as for-profit enterprises, and
may not necessarily represent the same
perspective or interests as the tribes.
Consultation and coordination with the
corporations will follow the same
process as described in this Policy for
tribes, with the following exceptions:
a. Consultations with Alaska Native
Corporations will occur on a
‘‘government-to-corporation’’ basis,
rather than ‘‘government-togovernment’’ basis to reflect the
distinction between sovereign
governments and corporate entities.
b. Government-to-corporations
consultations will occur with
appropriate adjustments given the
unique status, structure, and interests of
Alaska Native Corporations.
Section 9. Implementation
01. The Tribal Consultation Official,
located in OLIA within the Office of the
Secretary, is responsible for ensuring
implementation of this Policy. This
responsibility may be delegated as
appropriate. This Policy does not alter
or affect any existing duty or authority
of any individual operating unit.
02. This Policy is not intended to, and
does not, grant, expand, create or
diminish any legally enforceable rights,
benefits, or trust responsibilities,
substantive or procedural, not otherwise
granted or created under existing law.
Nor shall this Policy be construed to
alter, amend, repeal, interpret, or
modify tribal sovereignty, any treaty
rights of any Indian tribes, or to
preempt, modify, or limit the exercise of
any such rights.
03. This Policy is intended to improve
the Department’s management of its
relations and cooperative activities with
Indian tribes. The Department and
operating units have no obligation to
engage in any consultation activities
under this policy unless they are
practicable and permitted by law.
Nothing in this policy requires any
budgetary obligation or creates a right of
33339
action against the Department for failure
to comply with this policy nor creates
any right, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law by a party against the
United States, its agencies, or any
person.
04. This Policy shall be updated as
necessary.
Section 10. Effective Date
01. This Policy is effective beginning
with the date of this memorandum and
will remain in effect until it is amended,
superseded by a Departmental
Administrative Order, or revoked.
Dated: May 21, 2013.
Rebecca M. Blank,
Acting Secretary of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2013–13052 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–17–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Economic Development Administration
Notice of Petitions by Firms for
Determination of Eligibility To Apply
for Trade Adjustment Assistance
Economic Development
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice and Opportunity for
Public Comment.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to Section 251 of the Trade
Act 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341
et seq.), the Economic Development
Administration (EDA) has received
petitions for certification of eligibility to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
from the firms listed below.
Accordingly, EDA has initiated
investigations to determine whether
increased imports into the United States
of articles like or directly competitive
with those produced by each of these
firms contributed importantly to the
total or partial separation of the firm’s
workers, or threat thereof, and to a
decrease in sales or production of each
petitioning firm.
LIST OF PETITIONS RECEIVED BY EDA FOR CERTIFICATION ELIGIBILITY TO APPLY FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE
[5/23/2013 through 5/29/2013]
Date accepted
for investigation
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Firm name
Firm address
7 Mile Solutions, Inc. ................
7540 Caldwell Avenue, Niles,
IL 60714.
1540 Lake St, LaPorte, IN
46350.
165 Oak Lane, McSherrystown,
PA 17344.
R&R Tool & Manufacturing, Inc.
SAY Plastics, Inc. .....................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:33 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
5/22/2013
5/22/2013
5/24/2013
Sfmt 4703
Product(s)
Firm manufactures electromechanical assemblies for the
medical and industrial industries.
Firm manufacturers metal parts for air compressors from
sheet metal, aluminum and stainless steel.
Firm manufactures thermoformed plastic components and
assemblies for various industries that include medical,
transportation and recreation.
E:\FR\FM\04JNN1.SGM
04JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33331-33339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13052]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket Number: 120530127-2127-02]
Tribal Consultation and Coordination Policy for the U.S.
Department of Commerce
AGENCY: Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Final Policy Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (November 6, 2000), the
Department of Commerce (Department) adopts the following Tribal
Consultation and Coordination policy statement. This policy establishes
the manner in which the Department works with federally-recognized
Indian tribes when developing Department policies that have tribal
implications. The policy reaffirms the unique government-to-government
relationship that exists between Indian tribes and the Department. The
Department continues its commitment to support tribes in the
development of strong and stable economies able to participate in
today's national and global marketplace. The notice also summarizes
comments received on the draft Tribal Consultation and Coordination
policy statement published in the Federal Register on July 3, 2012 (77
FR 39464) and the Department's response to these comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
an electronic copy of the final policy should be directed to Dee
Alexander,
[[Page 33332]]
Senior Advisor on Native American Affairs, Office of Legislative and
Intergovernmental Affairs, U.S. Department of Commerce Room 5422, 1401
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20233, telephone (202) 482-0789.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
E.O. 13175, ``requires Federal agencies to have an accountable
process to ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
developing policies that have tribal implications, and are responsible
for strengthening the government-to-government relationship between the
United States and Indian tribes.''
On November 5, 2009, President Barack Obama reaffirmed the
government-to-government relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribal governments in a White House memorandum. Among other
things, this memorandum acknowledges that Indian tribes exercise
inherent sovereign powers over their members and territory. The
memorandum also acknowledges that the United States continues to work
with Indian tribes on a government-to-government basis to address
issues concerning Indian tribal self-government, tribal trust
resources, and Indian tribal treaty and other rights.
This final policy statement is intended only for internal
management purposes and does not create any right, benefit, or
responsibility enforceable against the United States, its agencies,
entities, or instrumentalities, its officers or employees, or any other
person. The Department believes this policy responds to President
Obama's memorandum and builds upon and expands the principles expressed
in the Department's previous policy, ``American Indian and Alaska
Native Policy of the Department of Commerce,'' promulgated on March 30,
1995. The Policy incorporates the requirements of E.O. No. 13175, and
the Office of Management and Budget Memorandum, ``Guidance for
Implementing E.O. 13175, `Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments.'''
Summary of Comments Received in Response to the Draft Consultation and
Coordination Policy
On July 3, 2012, the Department published a notice and request for
comments on a draft ``Consultation and Coordination Policy for the U.S.
Department of Commerce'' policy statement in the Federal Register (77
FR 39464). The Department received letters from 15 different entities,
with approximately 48 unique comments in response to the draft policy
statement. A summary of comments received and the Department's
responses to these comments are presented below. The Department also
received seven comments and recommendations not specific to the policy
principles. The notice also includes comments and the Department's
responses to those comments received from two national webinars held on
September 12, 2012 and September 19, 2012.
General Comments and Recommendations
Comment 1: The broad statement in the background section of the
July 3 notice, that the policy ``may not apply to a particular
situation based upon the circumstances,'' should be replaced with a
narrow description of the situations to which the policy would apply.
Response: Because the statement was included in the general
background information in the Federal Register notice, it is not a part
of the Department's policy request for comments. Therefore, no changes
to the policy have been made in response to this comment.
Comment 2: Include in the final tribal consultation policy and
supporting information a (1) description of efforts made to coordinate
and consult with tribal officials on the draft policy; (2) complete
summary of public comments, especially from tribal members; and (3)
description of how the Department has addressed or incorporated
comments into the final policy.
Response: The Department included the requested information in this
notice.
Comment 3: The comprehensive Consultation and Coordination Policy
should include overseeing consultation efforts between state, tribal
and local entities and independent entities, such as the First
Responder Network Authority (FirstNet).
Response: The Department will not implement this policy in such a
manner as to conflict with statutory requirements. The Middle Class Tax
Relief Act and Job Creation Act of 2012, which establishes FirstNet,
describes a statutory method for consultation between FirstNet and
State, local, and tribal entities. The Department, in coordination with
FirstNet, will determine the policy's applicability to other similar
authorities as necessary.
Comment 4: Clarify the Department's role in coordinating with other
federal agencies, and increase interagency coordination and
collaboration to increase government efficiency and accountability.
Response: The Department will determine the scope and timing of any
required interagency coordination as circumstances indicate.
Comment 5: Amend the policy to apply to Fishery Management
Councils.
Response: Council meetings are a critical part of the fishery
management planning process and are the first and earliest point of
development for fishery management policy. It is most beneficial to
Tribes, Councils and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) if there is early and active participation by Indian Tribes and
Alaska Natives in these fora. NOAA strongly encourages Councils to
discuss and work with Tribes to address their concerns while developing
fishery conservation and management measures under the Magnuson Stevens
Act, (MSA) 16 U.S.C. 1800 et seq. Thus, while it is NOAA's--and not the
Councils'--responsibility to consult with federally recognized tribes
under E.O. 13175, the Councils' current and future early engagement
will facilitate and enhance tribal input into NOAA's rulemaking
processes.
Comment 6: The policy should clarify that the Department's agency
research activities are subject to the policy.
Response: Research activities conducted by a Department's bureau or
agency are subject to this Policy and E.O. 13175 whenever such
activities involve actions or policies that have tribal implications.
The Department complies with existing statutory and regulatory
consultation obligations.
Comment 7: How will the new policy affect the status of existing
co-management agreements with the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS)?
Response: The new policy has no effect on co-management agreements
established under section 119 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. NMFS
will continue to work with Alaska Native organizations under co-
management agreements. Such co-management does not constitute, nor is
it a substitute for, government-to-government consultation as required
by E.O. 13175.
Comments to Section 1: Introduction
Comment 8: Add more language to the Introduction Section of the
policy statement that reflects tribal sovereignty and tribes' rights to
self-determination and self-government.
Response: The Department adopts the recommendation and has added
the sentence to Section 1.01 stating, ``The Department recognizes
Indian tribal self-government and supports tribal sovereignty and self-
determination.''
[[Page 33333]]
Comment 9: Include the term ``on a pre-decisional basis'' in
Section 1.01. The term will ensure that the consultation occurs before
a policy is changed.
Response: The Department does not adopt this recommendation. The
term ``pre-decisional'' is a term of art, and is not appropriate for
this policy. The Department adheres to Section 3 of E.O. 13175, which
includes the timing of consultation with the Department or its
operating units, as stated in Section 7.02 of this policy.
Comment 10: Reference Executive Orders and Secretarial Orders in
the Introduction Section of the policy.
Response: The Department refers to E.O. 13175 in Section 1.04 of
this final policy. This policy does not refer to Secretarial Orders
because the Department has joint Secretarial Orders with the Department
of the Interior to implement provisions of the Endangered Species Act
which only applies to specific Department components. It is not
appropriate to include existing Secretarial Orders as part of this
policy.
Comment 11: Include the relevant ``regulations, statutes,
Presidential memoranda, and Executive Orders'' in the Introduction
section of the policy statement.
Response: The Department adopts this comment and has added the
following sentence to the end of Section 1.04: ``This Policy is to be
construed consistent with Federal statutes, regulations, Presidential
memoranda, Executive Orders, and other relevant Federal legal
authorities.''
Comment 12: Substitute the word ``input'' in the first sentence of
Section 1.04 with ``participation.''
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
term ``input'' is consistent with Section 5(a) of E.O. 13175.
Comment 13: Include a new sub-section in the Introduction Section
of the policy with the following wording; ``The Department recognizes
and respects the diversity of Indian tribes and understands that they
are culturally, traditionally, and administratively different. This
diversity makes it impossible for any federal agency to make the sole
decision regarding whether or in what manner it is appropriate to
consult with tribes. The only entities that know enough about
individual tribes to make that determination are the tribes themselves.
Therefore, consultation can be initiated by either the Tribes or the
Department.''
Response: Section 7.01 of this policy provides for consultation
initiated by either a Tribe or the Department.
Comments to Section 2: Background
Comment 14: The policy should clarify whether it replaces the 1995
policy. If it does not, then include the 10 enumerated principles and
expand the principles in the new policy.
Response: To be clear, this new policy replaces the 1995 policy and
builds and expands upon the principles in the 1995 policy, and it
incorporates the requirements of E.O. 13175 and Presidential
Memorandum, ``Tribal Consultation,'' 2009 Daily Comp. Pres. Docs. 887
(November 5, 2009). The Department also references the 1995 American
Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the Department of Commerce in
Section 2.01 of this policy.
Comment 15: Include E.O. 13175's policymaking criteria with
explanation of how DOC will apply them when ``formulating and
implementing policies that have tribal implications.''
Response: This recommendation is addressed in Section 2.01 of the
policy, which incorporates E.O. 13175, Presidential Memorandum,
``Tribal Consultation,'' and the Office of Management and Budget's
implementing guidance of July 30, 2010.
Comment 16: Provide additional guidance on the Department's process
for determining whether policies have tribal implications, including
examples of past Department actions that were subject to consultations.
Provide detailed guidance on how the Department will conduct
consultations and prepare tribal impact statements for regulations with
tribal impacts that impose costs, are not required by legislation, and
preempt tribal law.
Response: The Department does not adopt this recommendation. This
policy is intended to provide high-level guidance to operating units to
implement depending on their circumstances and governing legal
authorities. The policy also provides the Department with the necessary
flexibility to ensure its consultations are as effective as possible.
Comments to Section 3: Authority
The Department received no comments to Section 3.
Comments to Section 4: Definitions
Comment 17: Amend the definition 4.01, ``Consultation'' to include
an accountable process, which enables Tribal officials to participate
in Federal decision-making before an agency takes an action, or commits
to a decision to consider an action or policy with Tribal implications.
Note that consultation is not a single act of communication, but
consists of multiple steps which culminate in an outcome that reflects
the views, needs and objectives of both Federal and Tribal
participants.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
definition in this final policy is consistent with E.O. 13175. Section
7 of this policy also addresses the elements of consultation including
means of communication, exchange of information, and notice.
Comment 18: Amend the definition of ``Consultation'' to incorporate
the following key principles: Consultation is a process which enables
the tribes to participate in federal decision making before an agency
takes an action, or commits to a decision to consider an action or
policy with tribal implications. Consultation is not a single act of
communication but rather a process involving multiple steps which
culminate in an outcome that reflects the views, needs and objectives
of both federal and tribal participants. Consultation may be initiated
by tribal governments to discuss and exchange information on a
government-to-government basis. Consultation can be formal with
established time lines and required publications, or less formal
through means such as teleconferencing. Consultation is triggered when
the Department considers ``Policies that have tribal implications,'' as
that term is defined in E.O. 13175, or when the Department considers
proposals for regulations, rulemaking, legislation, guidance, policy
formulation or actions that may have a substantial direct effect on one
or more tribes, on the relationship between tribes and the federal
government, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the tribes and federal government.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
final policy's definition is consistent with E.O. 13175; moreover,
Section 7 of this policy addresses the elements of consultation
including means of communication, exchange of information, and notice.
Comment 19: Add to the definition of ``consultation'' the term
``actions'' in addition to ``policies.''
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
term ``policies that have tribal implications'' is the term for actions
requiring the procedures described in the E.O. 13175 and therefore,
this Department policy implements E.O. 13175.
Comment 20: The policy should include Alaska Native Corporation in
the definition of ``Indian Tribe,'' or adopt a parallel formal
consultation policy for Alaska Native Corporations,
[[Page 33334]]
per the Congressional direction to Federal Agencies in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-199, Div. H, Section 161, which
is codified as a note to 25 U.S.C. Sec. 450.
Response: The Department has added the following definition for
Alaska Native Corporations and will include ANCs in the policy
consistent with 25 U.S.C. Sec. 450 note on ``Consultation with Alaska
Native Corporations: 07. ``Alaska Native Corporation,'' pursuant to 43
U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 1602 et seq., any Regional Corporation, any Village
Corporation, any Urban Corporation, and any Group Corporation as
defined in, or established pursuant to, the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act.
The Department also added a new Section 8. ``Consultation with
Alaska Native Corporations,'' to the Policy, which reads as follows:
01. In 2004, through two consolidated appropriations acts, Congress
required federal agencies to consult with Alaska Native Corporations on
the same basis as federally recognized Indian Tribes under E.O. 13175
(Public Law 108-199, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108-447, 118
Stat. 3267).
02. The Department interprets the term ``Alaska Native
Corporations'' in this requirement to mean ``Native Corporations'' as
that term is defined under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
(ANCSA) of 1971. Congress created regional, village, and urban
corporations to manage the lands, funds, and other assets conveyed to
Alaska Natives by ANCSA. There are 13 regional corporations and over
200 village corporations in Alaska. The village corporations generally
represent shareholders in villages associated with the 229 federally
recognized tribes in Alaska. Most Alaska Native Corporation
shareholders also are members of a federally recognized tribe in
Alaska.
03. The Department will implement the requirement to consult with
Alaska Native Corporations in a manner as close as possible to
consultations with federally recognized tribes in Alaska, while
recognizing the important differences between sovereign tribal
governments and the federal trust responsibility to those tribal
governments and corporations obligated to maximize financial returns to
shareholders. Alaska Native Corporations were established to operate as
for-profit enterprises, and may not necessarily represent the same
perspective or interests as the tribes. Consultation and coordination
with the corporations will follow the same process as described in this
Policy for tribes, with the following exceptions:
a. Consultations with Alaska Native Corporations will occur on a
``government-to-corporation'' basis, rather than ``government-to-
government'' basis to reflect the distinction between sovereign
governments and corporate entities.
b. Government-to-corporation consultations will occur with
appropriate adjustments given the unique status, structure, and
interests of Alaska Native Corporations.
Comment 21: Clarify whether the policy applies to the Office of the
Secretary as well as to its operating units, and identify the
organizations to which the policy does not apply. Also, require the
implementation of procedures at each bureau and agency level to allow
the bureaus/agencies to determine when a policy has tribal
implications, and allow the Tribes to consult on the various agency-
level policies.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. This
policy is intended to provide high-level guidance to the Department's
bureaus to allow them to implement the policy depending on their
circumstances and governing legal authorities. Section 6 of the policy
allows, but does not require, the development of operating level,
bureau and agency, procedures. The policy applies to the Office of the
Secretary, as implemented by the Tribal Consultation Official, see
Section 5.01.
Comment 22: On definition 4.04, ``policies that have tribal
implications'':
a. Tribal consultation officials should interpret the term
``policies that have tribal implications'' broadly so that the term
applies to more than just regulations and legislative action. The
policy should clarify that the phrase in section 7.02.a ``other policy
statements and actions'' is intended to apply broadly to include all
written statements of policy or actions that have the potential to
affect tribal rights and interests.
b. Tribal consultations should also be triggered by any Department
action that affects American Indian, Alaska Native and Native American
tribes, not just formal Department policies.
c. Include language about the timing of consultation. Amend the
policy to include the following or similar language from the 1995
policy: ``work with tribal governments prior to implementing any
action.''
Response: The subject phrase is a term defined in E.O. 13175 and
applies to ``actions'' as well as policies and regulations.
Comment 23: Amend definition 4.05 ``Tribal Officials,'' to read as
follows: ```Tribal officials' means an elected or duly appointed Tribal
leader or official delegate, designated in writing by a Tribe, or a
duly authorized representative of an authorized intertribal
organization.'' Also, include official delegates who are designated as
such by their tribes to ensure that individuals who have been
authorized to consult on behalf of their tribe will be accorded the
same status as elected or duly appointed officials.
Response: The Department used the definition from E.O. 13175 for
``Tribal officials,'' which includes ``duly appointed officials,''
meaning that a delegated representative of a tribal government will be
recognized as an appropriate ``tribal official.''
Comments to Section 5: Roles and Responsibilities
Comment 24: The tribal consultation official should develop
protocols, SOPs and, as appropriate, a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) for formal and informal consultations. These documents would
establish the means for providing and exchanging information between
the Department and tribal governments.
Response: The Department does not adopt this recommendation. This
policy is intended to provide high-level guidance to the Department's
bureaus and agencies to allow them to implement the policy depending on
their circumstances and governing legal authorities. The Department
intends that operating units address such procedures in their handbooks
or other guidance as appropriate.
Comment 25: The Department should encourage each of its bureaus and
agencies to allocate funding toward Tribal consultation activities,
including consultation itself, staff training, and other associated
activities.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
Department will encourage the operating units to work within existing
resources to comply with E.O. 13175.
Comment 26: Tribal officials situated at headquarters are poorly
positioned to implement the meaningful and timely consultation process
anticipated by E.O. 13175. National consultation officials have little
experience on the regional issues and insufficient time to focus on the
issues to effectively monitor and coordinate. A regional consultation
official would have more regular contact with the tribes and would be
able to screen issues and provide advance notice of impending issues.
Therefore, change Section 5.02.b to require the designation of
consultation coordinators at the regional level, particularly within
operating units such as NOAA. Also,
[[Page 33335]]
give the tribes significant input into the selection process for the
designated national and regional consultation officials.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. Section
5.02.b of this policy allows operating units to delegate authority.
Comment 27: The Department's tribal consultation official or
designee should certify to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
that draft final regulations or proposed regulations with tribal
implications comply with EO 13175. A tribal consultation summary report
is part of the required annual update to OMB that each agency must
provide.
Response: The Department added a paragraph under Section 5.01; the
new paragraph reads: d. The Tribal Consultation Official has the
responsibility for submitting an annual report to OMB pursuant section
7(a) of E.O. 13175.
Comment 28: Make it clear how, and when, each operating unit
designates officials to consult with the tribes. Explain how tribes can
open lines of communication with the designated officials.
Response: Pursuant to Section 5.02.a of the policy, each operating
unit is responsible for designating an official at the operating unit
level and for the timing of that designation.
Comment 29: Clarify the term ``periodic dialogue'' in Section
5.01.c, or replace that phrase with the term ``meaningful dialogue'' or
``biannually'' to give more guidance on what the term means in the
context of the policy.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
phrase ``periodic dialogue'' is intended to allow flexibility in the
regular review of this policy's implementation.
Comment 30: Section 5.02.a. of the Policy states that the head of
each operating unit within the Department will designate an official to
ensure compliance with the Policy. As written, there is no timeframe
for this designation in the policy. Institute a timeframe for this
process. Additionally, some units already have an experienced
designated official, while other units' designated officials may have
little to no experience in tribal consultation. Increase
interdepartmental cooperation, in addition to providing a timeline for
designating the officials, to provide certainty and continuity for
Tribes as they navigate the new policy and interact with federal
officials across the Department.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. The
Department determined that these responsibilities are best addressed at
the operating unit level to allow each operating unit to assess its
needs to support interactions and relationships with tribes.
Comment 31: Add the following responsibilities to the tribal
consultation official or designated officials in the operating units
Section: Responding to inquiries from tribes about a specific
consultation--past, ongoing, or proposed; responding to inquiries about
the consultation process in general; receiving requests from tribes
seeking to initiate consultation; coordinating to identify and screen
for potential consultation issues; preserving and maintaining complete
consultation records; assisting tribal governments seeking to access
consultation records; and receiving post-consultation complaints,
objections, and alleged inconsistencies.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. This
policy is intended to provide high-level guidance to the Department's
bureaus and agencies to allow them to implement the policy depending on
their circumstances and governing legal authorities. The Department
intends that operating units address this matter in their handbooks or
other guidance as appropriate.
Comment 32: Establish tribal liaison positions to implement the
consultation policy, and to encourage agencies to allocate funding for
tribal consultations.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation, and
encourages operating units to work with existing resources and staff to
comply with E.O. 13175.
Comments to Section 6: Training and Guidance
Comment 33: The focus of the consultation in most cases should be
at the local level; however, it is critical that bureau or agency
officials at the headquarters level with no background in tribal
relations be properly trained in the consultation process.
Response: This policy provides for training in Section 6.01.
Comment 34: Section 6.02 provides that ``each operating unit may
develop and issue tribal consultation guidance.'' Agencies should be
required to develop Tribal consultation guidance. This guidance should
be developed under supervision of the Tribal Consultation Official to
ensure that its content is uniform across the Department's operating
units.
Response: The Department addresses this recommendation in Section
6.02 of the Policy which permits operating units to develop tribal
consultation guidance provided that the guidance is consistent with DAO
218-8 and is reviewed by the Tribal Consultation Official.
Comments to Section 7: Consultation
Comment 35: The term ``reasonable effort'' in Section 7 is unclear.
Clarify that the Department will confirm receipt of a tribal request
for consultation within 30 days, or even 45 days. Tribes believe that
there are few circumstances where the Department would not be able to
accommodate a request, and urge the Department to conduct face-to-face
consultations with tribes.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendations.
Operating units may have specific time constraints imposed by statute
or circumstances, and this policy is intended to provide them with the
flexibility to accommodate those constraints.
Comment 36: It is important for the consultation process to retain
the requirement that it is a government-to-government interaction. The
consultation process must also involve elected tribal officials unless
otherwise approved by the tribe.
Response: This comment is addressed in the policy definition of
``Tribal officials,'' adopted from Section 1(d) of E.O. 13175.
Comment 37: The Department should include in the policy further
guidance indicating standards for determining which forms of
consultation are appropriate in various circumstances, and allow the
tribes to consult on these standards.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. This
policy is intended to provide high-level guidance to allow operating
units to implement the policy depending on their circumstances and
governing legal authorities. The Department intends that operating
units address details of their respective consultation process in their
handbooks or other guidance as appropriate.
Comment 38: Coordination with the tribes should not be limited to
formal consultation, and a variety of consultation types should be
further defined in sub-section 01. Consultation types could include
informal discussions with tribal leaders, meetings with individual
tribes, listening sessions, and formal consultations. Add as the last
section to sub-section 01: ``Ultimately the consultation process is to
entail an informed discussion of the proposed federal policy and
associated tribal concerns between the designated Tribal Consultation
Official and tribal officials.''
[[Page 33336]]
Response: The Department adopts this recommendation and has added
the following language to the end of Section 7.01: Ultimately, the
consultation process is to entail an informed discussion of the
proposed federal policy and associated tribal concerns between the
designated Tribal Consultation Official and tribal officials.
Comment 39: Develop a tribal liaison position for the Alaska
region. Tribal liaisons should be trained in how to conduct tribal
consultations to help facilitate tribal-agency relationships.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation to
develop a tribal liaison position for the Alaska region. This comment
has been forwarded to NOAA for its consideration.
Comment 40: The phrase ``reasonable effort'' in Section 7.02.b. is
unclear, and should either be removed and replaced with language
clarifying the specific time frame that the Department considers
reasonable.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation to
remove the term ``reasonable effort'' because consultations are
intended to reflect a relationship between the operating unit and the
tribe, taking into account the resources and mission of the operating
unit. Some operating units have specific time constraints imposed by
statute or other circumstances, and this policy is intended to provide
those units with sufficient flexibility to accommodate those
parameters.
Comment 41: Add to end of last sentence in Section 7.02.b. the
following language: ``prior to substantive decision points and/or final
action'' and include that ``the timing of consultation is to allow for
the substantive consideration of tribal input and concerns before
finalizing a decision on federal policies, regulations, or
legislation.''
Response: The Department adopts the recommendation in part and has
added the following language to the end of subsection b.: Exchange of
Information. The Department and operating units will make a reasonable
effort to identify and provide timely and accurate information for
consultation prior to substantive decision or final action.
Comment 42: Section 7.02.c. should include a statement that the
Department will clearly notify tribes of events such as meetings that
it considers to be consultations, and that the Department will do so
within 45 or 90 days prior to the consultation. The Department should
seek tribal participation in its deliberative process about the
necessity of a proposed action.
Response: The Department will advise its operating units to provide
45 days advanced notice of any invitation to conduct a consultation, or
to provide notice at the earliest time practicable. Such notices will
include any relevant materials to facilitate discussion. This response
does not supersede any existing legal authorities or responsibilities
of the operating units.
Comment 43: Communication to and from rural Alaska can be
difficult, and the Department should follow up on correspondence to
Tribes and Tribal entities. Response: The final policy addresses
follow-up notices to tribal officials in Section 7.02.
Comment 44: The phrase ``when practical'' in Sections 7.01, 7.02.b
and 7.02.d is unclear, and the Department should amend the section to
clarify that the Department will provide tribes with a specific amount
of time to prepare for consultations and submit views, and will be
flexible about the time allowed.
Response: The Department agrees with the recommendation to provide
Tribes adequate time to prepare for consultation as well as relevant
materials to facilitate and submit their views, and will advise its
operating units to develop consultation materials, as appropriate. In
addition, the Department has added the following language to Section
7.01 Consultation/Consultation Process: ``The Tribal Consultation
Official or the head of each operating unit, as applicable, will treat
a request for consultation from a tribal official in an expedited
fashion and provide a written response confirming receipt of the
request.''
Comment 45: For Section 7.e., when a consultation occurs between
the Department or its operating units and Tribal officials, the
Department or operating unit should provide the Tribal officials with a
formal, written communication that summarizes the consultation, and
responds to the issues and concerns, if any, identified during
consultation. Tribes should be able to agree to the accuracy of the
summaries of the tribes' position in the consultation. The follow-up
communications should be transmitted within 30 days of the
consultation. They should also specifically indicate whether the
Department accepts the tribes' position, or include an explanation of
the Department's position. The Tribal Consultation Official or head of
each operating unit conducting a consultation should also maintain
documentation addressing the consultation, tribal concerns, and
recommendations in conformance with applicable records retention
schedules. Additionally, the policy should acknowledge that Tribes are
more familiar with their local environment and, thus, the policy should
clarify that the Tribes possess unique knowledge. The policy should
also allow the Tribes to initiate consultations whenever there is a
potential for their rights and interests to be affected. The
consultation process should also be timely and initiated early in the
decision making process to allow the tribe to have access to
information about the proposed regulation or policy. Regular
communication between the Department and a Tribe is an essential
precursor to the consultation process; consultation should be as a
matter of course and not just when ``practical.'' The policy should
also distinguish between regular communications, calls, site visits,
and participation in events and informal meetings, which are not
intended to serve as the formal negotiation component of the
government-to-government consultation process.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation for a
specified timeframe to submit a written summary of the consultation.
Section 7.2.e. of the policy states that ``the Department or operating
unit will provide the Tribal officials with a formal, written
communication that summarizes the consultation, and responds to the
issues and concerns, if any, identified during consultation.'' The
Department expects operating units to address written consultation
summaries in their handbooks or other guidance, as appropriate. Written
summaries are not intended to be used to document regular
communications and interactions between Department employees and
Tribes; rather, these written communications are part of the
consultation process.
Comment 46: A written summary of consultation should include the
Tribe's responses and should become part of the official record on
consultation activities maintained by the operating unit and the
Department, and should form the basis for a tribal impact summary.
Response: E.O. 13175 requires a tribal summary impact statement
when an agency (1) promulgates regulations that have tribal
implications, that impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian
tribal governments, and are not required by statute, or (2) promulgates
regulations that have tribal implications and that preempt tribal law.
The Department intends consultation reporting to be a separate
component of all consultations, regardless of whether they involve
regulations. In response to this comment, the Department has added the
following language as a new subparagraph to 5.02.c. The head of
[[Page 33337]]
each operating unit will consult with Tribes and prepare tribal summary
impact statements when promulgating any regulations that have tribal
implications, that impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian
tribal governments, and that are not required by statute; and when
promulgating any regulation that has tribal implications and that
preempts tribal law.
Comment 47: The Department should distribute a follow-up report
detailing immediate and long-term actions to be taken after
consultations, and should add language in Section 7.02.e. to the effect
that documentation includes any proposal for Departmental follow-up
actions.
Response: The Department does not adopt the recommendation. Section
7.02.e. sufficiently addresses this request by requiring the Department
or operating unit to provide tribal officials with ``a formal written
communication that summarizes the consultation, and responds to the
issues and concerns, if any, identified during the consultation.''
Changes to the Proposed Policy
The policy statement adopted in this Notice differs from the
proposed policy statement as follows:
(a) Proposed policy Section No. 1, ``Introduction,'' subparagraphs
01. and 04. were modified in response to comments.
(b) Proposed policy Section No. 2, ``Background,'' subparagraph 01.
was modified to include wording on consultation with Alaska Native
Corporations in compliance with existing law.
(c) Proposed policy Section No. 4, ``Definitions,'' subparagraph
03. was modified to expressly state that the definition of operating
units includes all bureaus and agencies in response to comments.
(d) Proposed policy Section No. 4, ``Definitions,'' was modified to
include a definition for ``Alaska Native Corporation'' in response to
comments.
(e) Proposed policy Section No 5, ``Roles and Responsibilities for
Consultation,'' subsection 01. was modified to include additional
reporting language in response to comments.
(f) Proposed policy Section No. 5, ``Roles and Responsibilities for
Consultation,'' subsection 02. was modified in response to comments to
include additional responsibilities language for the heads of operating
units.
(g) Proposed policy Consultation Process Section No. 7,
``Consultation Process,'' subparagraph 01. was modified and includes
additional language relating to the purpose of consultation.
(h) Proposed policy Consultation Process Section No. 7,
``Consultation Process,'' subparagraph 02 was modified in response to
comments received to include additional language relating to responses
to requests for tribal consultations.
(i) Proposed policy Section No. 8, ``Implementation,'' was
renumbered to Section No. 9.
(j) A new Section No. 8, ``Consultation with Alaska Native
Corporations,'' was added to address the consultation with Alaska
Native Corporations.
The final Consultation and Coordination Policy of the U.S.
Department of Commerce now reads as follows:
Tribal Consultation and Coordination Policy of the U.S. Department of
Commerce
Section 1. Introduction
01. This ``Tribal Consultation and Coordination Policy of the U.S.
Department of Commerce'' (``Tribal Consultation Policy'' or ``Policy'')
establishes the manner in which the Department of Commerce
(``Department'') works with Indian tribes on a government-to-government
basis to build a durable relationship and address issues concerning
tribal self-government, tribal trust resources, and tribal treaty and
other rights, as well as support tribes in developing strong and stable
economies able to participate in the national and global marketplace.
The Department recognizes Indian tribal self-government and supports
tribal sovereignty and self-determination.
02. The Department recognizes the Federal Government's unique legal
relationship, as established in the Constitution, statutes, treaties
and federal court decisions, between Tribal governments and the Federal
Government.
03. The Department and operating units will seek and promote
cooperation within the Department and with other agencies that have
related responsibilities. The Department's mission encompasses many
complex issues where cooperation and mutual consideration among
governments (federal, state, tribal, and local) are essential. The
Department and operating units will promote intradepartmental and
interagency coordination and cooperation to assist Tribal governments
in resolving issues requiring mutual effort.
04. Executive Order (E.O.) No. 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' requires federal
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by tribal officials in developing policies that have tribal
implications. This Policy provides uniform standards and methodology
outlining consultation procedures for all Department personnel working
with Tribal governments regarding policies that have tribal
implications. This Policy is to be construed consistent with Federal
statutes, regulations, Presidential memoranda, Executive Orders, and
other relevant Federal legal authorities.
Section 2. Background
01. This Policy builds upon and expands the principles expressed in
the ``American Indian and Alaska Native Policy of the Department of
Commerce,'' promulgated by the Department on March 30, 1995. The Tribal
Consultation Policy incorporates the requirements of E.O. No. 13175;
Presidential Memorandum, ``Tribal Consultation,'' 2009 Daily Comp.
Pres. Docs. 887 (November 5, 2009); the Office of Management and Budget
Memorandum, ``Guidance for Implementing E.O. 13175, `Consultation and
Coordination with Indian tribal Governments;' '' and the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2004, Pub. L. 108-199, Div. H Sec. 161, 118 Stat.
3, 452 (2004), as amended by Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005,
Pub. L. 108-447, Div. H., Title V Sec. 518, 118 Stat. 2809, 3267,
relating to consultation with Alaska Native Corporations.
02. This Policy is for internal management only and shall not be
construed to grant or vest any right to any party not otherwise granted
or vested by existing law or regulations.
Section 3. Authority
01. This Tribal Consultation Policy is issued pursuant to the
authority of 5 U.S.C. 301 and Department Administrative Order (DAO)
218-8, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.'' This Policy shall have the same force and effect as a
DAO. Amendments (substantive changes) or revisions (corrections or
updates) to this Policy may be developed and issued by the Department
of Commerce Tribal Consultation Official or the Secretary's designee in
consultation with Tribal governments.
Section 4. Definitions
01. ``Consultation,'' as defined in Section 5 of E.O. No. 13175,
refers to an accountable process ensuring meaningful and timely input
from tribal officials on Department policies that have tribal
implications.
[[Page 33338]]
02. ``Indian tribe (or Tribe),'' as defined in Section 1(b) of E.O.
No. 13175, means an Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation,
pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior
acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe pursuant to the Federally
Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994, 25 U.S.C. 479a.
03. ``Operating units,'' as defined in Section 3.c.1 of Department
Organization Order 1-1, are organizational entities outside the Office
of the Secretary charged with carrying out specified substantive
functions (i.e., programs) of the Department. The operating units are
the components of the Department through which most of its substantive
functions are carried out. ``Operating units'' includes all Department
bureaus and agencies.
04. ``Policies that have tribal implications,'' as defined in
Section 1(a) of E.O. No. 13175, refers to regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
05. ``Tribal Consultation Official,'' as defined in Section 5(a) of
E.O. No. 13175, means the designee of the Secretary with principal
responsibility for the implementation of this Policy.
06. ``Tribal officials,'' as defined in Section 1(d) of E.O. No.
13175, means elected or duly appointed officials of Indian tribal
governments or authorized intertribal organizations.
07. ``Alaska Native Corporation,'' pursuant to 43 U.S.C. 1602 et
seq., any Regional Corporation, any Village Corporation, any Urban
Corporation, and any Group Corporation as defined in, or established
pursuant to, the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act.
Section 5. Roles and Responsibilities for Consultations
01. Department of Commerce Tribal Consultation Official
a. The Tribal Consultation Official is an individual in the Office
of Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs (OLIA) within the Office
of the Secretary who is duly appointed to act as a liaison between the
Secretary of Commerce and Tribal officials. The Tribal Consultation
Official may delegate authority, as necessary, to the head of each
operating unit. The Tribal Consultation Official has primary
responsibility for ensuring compliance with DAO 218-8, this Policy, and
E.O. No. 13175, and is responsible for tribal consultations and
coordination for the Office of the Secretary programs.
b. The Tribal Consultation Official has responsibility for
coordinating the implementation of this Policy and DAO 218-8 within the
Department and all operating units.
c. The Tribal Consultation Official will engage tribal officials in
periodic dialogue to discuss the Department's implementation of this
Policy. The dialogue will provide an opportunity for tribal officials
to assess policy implementation, program delivery, and discuss outreach
and communication efforts, and other issues.
d. The Tribal Consultation Official is responsible for submitting
an annual report to OMB pursuant section 7(a) of E.O. No. 13175.
02. Head of operating unit Responsibilities
a. The head of each operating unit will designate an official in
the headquarters office who has primary responsibility for ensuring
compliance with this Policy within the operating unit. Each operating
unit's designated official will work with the Department Tribal
Consultation Official to ensure coordination of tribal consultations,
as necessary. The designated official is responsible for the
development, maintenance and internal distribution of any guidance
produced by the operating unit in compliance with the requirements of
this Policy.
b. The head of each operating unit or the designated official may
delegate authority to appropriate individuals within the operating
unit.
c. The head of each operating unit will consult with Tribes and
prepare tribal summary impact statements when promulgating any
regulations that have tribal implications, that impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and that are not
required by statute; and when promulgating any regulations that have
tribal implications and that preempt tribal law.
Section 6. Training and Guidance
01. The Tribal Consultation Official and the head of each operating
unit will ensure that personnel assisting with tribal consultations
have appropriate training.
02. Each operating unit may develop and issue tribal consultation
guidance to assist staff in preparing, reviewing and managing the
consultation process within their respective operating units, so long
as:
a. The guidance is consistent with DAO 218-8, and
b. The Department's Tribal Consultation Official reviews the
guidance.
Section 7. Consultation
01. The Consultation Process. Consultation may take a variety of
forms. Implementing this Policy may require a range of formal and
informal planning activities. The Department and operating units'
consultation processes may include one or more of the following:
meetings, letters, conference calls, webinars, on-site visits, or
participation in regional and national events. The Tribal Consultation
Official or the head of each operating unit, as applicable, will make a
reasonable effort to accommodate a tribal request for consultation.
Ultimately, the consultation process is to entail an informed
discussion of the proposed federal policy and associated tribal
concerns between the designated Tribal Consultation Official and tribal
officials.
02. Elements of the Consultation Process.
a. Ongoing communication shall be a regular part of the government-
to-government relationship with tribal governments. The Department and
operating units will engage in meaningful dialogue with Tribes
regarding all policies that have tribal implications.
b. Exchange of Information. The Department and operating units will
make a reasonable effort to identify and provide timely and accurate
information for consultation.
c. Notification. The Department and operating units will notify
Tribes of policies that have tribal implications. Follow-up may be
necessary to ensure the appropriate tribal official has received the
consultation notification and accompanying documents. These
notifications do not replace or supersede any notifications that are
required by statute or E.O. regarding tribal consultations.
d. Consultation Planning. The Department or operating units will
coordinate with tribal officials to plan logistical considerations for
the consultation. The Department or operating units will, when
practical, allow Tribes a reasonable amount of time to prepare for
consultation and submit their views on policies that have tribal
implications. The Tribal Consultation Official or the head of each
operating unit, as applicable, will treat a request for consultation
from a tribal official in an expedited fashion and provide a written
response confirming receipt of the request.
e. Written Communication and Record-Keeping. When a consultation
[[Page 33339]]
occurs between the Department or its operating units and Tribal
officials, the Department or operating unit will provide the Tribal
officials with a formal, written communication that summarizes the
consultation, and responds to the issues and concerns, if any,
identified during consultation. The Tribal Consultation Official or
head of each operating unit conducting a consultation will maintain
documentation addressing the consultation, tribal concerns, and
recommendations in conformance with applicable records retention
schedules.
Section 8. Consultation With Alaska Native Corporations
01. In 2004, through two consolidated appropriations acts, Congress
required federal agencies to consult with Alaska Native Corporations on
the same basis as federally recognized Indian Tribes under E.O. 13175
(Pub. L. 108-199, 118 Stat. 452, as amended by Pub. L. 108-447, 118
Stat. 3267).
02. The Department interprets the term ``Alaska Native
Corporations'' in this requirement to mean ``Native Corporations'' as
that term is defined under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act
(ANCSA) of 1971. Congress created regional, village, and urban
corporations to manage the lands, funds, and other assets conveyed to
Alaska Natives by ANCSA. There are 13 regional corporations and over
200 village corporations in Alaska. The village corporations generally
represent shareholders in villages associated with the 229 federally
recognized tribes in Alaska. Most Alaska Native Corporation
shareholders also are members of a federally recognized tribe in
Alaska.
03. The Department will implement the requirement to consult with
Alaska Native Corporations in a manner as close as possible to
consultations with federally recognized tribes in Alaska, while
recognizing the important differences between sovereign tribal
governments and the federal trust responsibility to those tribal
governments and corporations obligated to maximize financial returns to
shareholders. Alaska Native Corporations were established to operate as
for-profit enterprises, and may not necessarily represent the same
perspective or interests as the tribes. Consultation and coordination
with the corporations will follow the same process as described in this
Policy for tribes, with the following exceptions:
a. Consultations with Alaska Native Corporations will occur on a
``government-to-corporation'' basis, rather than ``government-to-
government'' basis to reflect the distinction between sovereign
governments and corporate entities.
b. Government-to-corporations consultations will occur with
appropriate adjustments given the unique status, structure, and
interests of Alaska Native Corporations.
Section 9. Implementation
01. The Tribal Consultation Official, located in OLIA within the
Office of the Secretary, is responsible for ensuring implementation of
this Policy. This responsibility may be delegated as appropriate. This
Policy does not alter or affect any existing duty or authority of any
individual operating unit.
02. This Policy is not intended to, and does not, grant, expand,
create or diminish any legally enforceable rights, benefits, or trust
responsibilities, substantive or procedural, not otherwise granted or
created under existing law. Nor shall this Policy be construed to
alter, amend, repeal, interpret, or modify tribal sovereignty, any
treaty rights of any Indian tribes, or to preempt, modify, or limit the
exercise of any such rights.
03. This Policy is intended to improve the Department's management
of its relations and cooperative activities with Indian tribes. The
Department and operating units have no obligation to engage in any
consultation activities under this policy unless they are practicable
and permitted by law. Nothing in this policy requires any budgetary
obligation or creates a right of action against the Department for
failure to comply with this policy nor creates any right, substantive
or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States,
its agencies, or any person.
04. This Policy shall be updated as necessary.
Section 10. Effective Date
01. This Policy is effective beginning with the date of this
memorandum and will remain in effect until it is amended, superseded by
a Departmental Administrative Order, or revoked.
Dated: May 21, 2013.
Rebecca M. Blank,
Acting Secretary of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2013-13052 Filed 6-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-17-P