National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site, 33276-33282 [2013-12969]
Download as PDF
33276
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
equipment and materials, storing of
equipment or setting up temporary
trailers to house construction
management or staff and contractor
personnel.; or
(ii) Entered into binding agreements
or contractual obligations, which cannot
be cancelled or modified without
substantial loss to the owner or
operator, to undertake a program of
actual construction of the source to be
completed within a reasonable time.
*
*
*
*
*
Forestry or silvicultural activities
means those activities associated with
regeneration, growing, and harvesting of
trees and timber including, but not
limited to, preparing sites for new
stands of trees to be either planted or
allowed to regenerate through natural
means, road construction and road
maintenance, fertilization, logging
operations, and forest management
techniques employed to enhance the
growth of stands of trees or timber.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 49.153 is amended by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) and
(iii);
■ b. Revising paragraphs (c)
introductory text and (c)(3); and
■ c. Adding paragraphs (c)(8) through
(13).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 49.153
Applicability.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) If you wish to begin construction
of a new synthetic minor source and/or
a new synthetic minor HAP source or a
modification at an existing synthetic
minor source and/or synthetic minor
HAP source, on or after August 30,
2011, you must obtain a permit
pursuant to § 49.158 prior to beginning
construction.
(iii) If you own or operate a synthetic
minor source or synthetic minor HAP
source that was established prior to the
effective date of this rule (that is, prior
to August 30, 2011) pursuant to the FIPs
applicable to the Indian reservations in
Idaho, Oregon and Washington or under
an EPA-approved rule or permit
program limiting potential to emit, you
do not need to take any action under
this program unless you propose a
modification for this existing synthetic
minor source and/or synthetic minor
HAP source on or after August 30, 2011.
For these modifications, you need to
obtain a permit pursuant to § 49.158
prior to beginning construction.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) What emissions units and
activities are exempt from this program?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
At a source that is otherwise subject to
this program, this program does not
apply to the following emissions units
and activities that are listed in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (13) of this
section:
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Cooking of food, except for
wholesale businesses that both cook and
sell cooked food.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Single family residences and
residential buildings with four or fewer
dwelling units.
(9) Emergency generators, designed
solely for the purpose of providing
electrical power during power outages:
(i) In nonattainment areas, the total
maximum manufacturer’s site-rated
horsepower of all units shall be below
500;
(ii) In attainment areas, the total
maximum manufacturer’s site-rated
horsepower of all units shall be below
1,000.
(10) Stationary internal combustion
engines with a manufacturer’s site-rated
horsepower of less than 50.
(11) Furnaces or boilers used for space
heating that exclusively use gaseous
fuel, with a total maximum heat input
(i.e., from all units combined) of:
(i) In nonattainment areas, 5 million
British thermal units per hour (MMBtu/
hr) or less;
(ii) In attainment areas, 10 MMBtu/hr
or less.
(12) Air conditioning units used for
human comfort that do not exhaust air
pollutants in the atmosphere from any
manufacturing or other industrial
processes.
(13) Forestry and silvicultural
activities.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 49.158 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 49.158
Synthetic minor source permits.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) If your existing synthetic minor
source and/or synthetic minor HAP
source was established pursuant to the
FIPs applicable to the Indian
reservations in Idaho, Oregon and
Washington or was established under an
EPA-approved rule or permit program
limiting potential to emit, you do not
need to take any action under this
program unless you propose a
modification for this existing synthetic
minor source and/or synthetic minor
HAP source on or after August 30, 2011.
For these modifications, you need to
obtain a permit pursuant to § 49.158
before you begin construction.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6. Section 49.160 is amended by
revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 49.160 Registration program for minor
sources in Indian country.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Report of relocation. After your
source has been registered, you must
report any relocation of your source to
the reviewing authority in writing no
later than 30 days prior to the relocation
of the source. Unless otherwise
specified in an existing permit, a report
of relocation shall be provided as
specified in paragraph (d)(1)(i) or (ii) of
this section, as applicable. In either
case, the permit application for the new
location satisfies the report of relocation
requirement.
(i) Where the relocation results in a
change in the reviewing authority for
your source, you must submit a report
of relocation to the current reviewing
authority and a permit application to
the new reviewing authority.
(ii) Where the reviewing authority
remains the same, a report of relocation
is fulfilled through the permit
application for the new location.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–13057 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003–0010; FRL–9818–6]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial
Deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 7 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the 1,154
parcels (of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site (Site) located in the eastern part of
the city of Omaha, Nebraska, from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and
requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the State of Nebraska, through the
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality (NDEQ), have determined that
all appropriate response actions under
CERCLA and other lead abatement
activities at these identified parcels
have been completed. However, this
deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to soils,
dust and deteriorating lead-based paint,
where applicable, of the 1,154
residential parcels. These types of
properties include single and multifamily dwellings, apartment complexes,
child-care facilities, vacant lots in
residential areas, schools, churches,
community centers, parks, greenways,
and any other areas where children may
be exposed to site-related contaminated
media. A listing of the parcels by
address can be found in Table 1 in the
deletion docket. Figure 1 also shows a
map of the Omaha Lead site and
identifies the parcels proposed for
deletion. Approximately 12,800
residential parcels and associated soil,
dust and deteriorating lead-based paint
will remain on the NPL and is/are not
being considered for deletion as part of
this action.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 5, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2003–0010, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: franceisetts.pauletta@epa.gov Fax: 913–551–
7066
• Mail: Environmental Protection
Agency, 8600 NE Underground Dr.,
Pillar 253,, Kansas City, Missouri 64161
Attention: Pauletta France-Isetts,
Superfund Division Hand delivery:
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Kansas 66219. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2003–
0010. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket:
All documents in the docket are listed
in the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in the hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
EPA Region 7, 11201 Renner
Boulevard., Lenexa, Kansas 66219 open
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
EPA Public Information Center
(north), 3040 Lake Street, Omaha, NE
68111 open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. call
(402) 991–9583 to ensure staff are
available; EPA Public Information
Center (south) 4909 S. 25th Street,
Omaha, NE 68107, open from 8 a.m. to
4 p.m. call (402) 731–3045 to ensure
staff are available; W. Dale Clark
Library, 215 S. 15th Street; Omaha, NE
68102
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pauletta France-Isetts, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7, Superfund Division,
8600 NE Underground Drive, Pillar 253,
Kansas City, Missouri 64161, (913)–
339–8105, email: franceisetts.pauletta@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33277
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 7 announces its intent to
delete the 1,154 residential parcel(s)
(identified in Table 1 and Figure 1 of the
deletion docket) of the Omaha Lead
Superfund Site (Site), from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and request public
comment on this proposed action. The
NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR
part 300, which is the Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA maintains the NPL as those sites
that appear to present a significant risk
to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). This partial deletion of the
Omaha Lead Superfund Site is proposed
in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e)
and is consistent with the Notice of
Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites
Listed on the National Priorities List. 60
FR 55466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described
in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of
a site deleted from the NPL remains
eligible for Fund-financed remedial
action if future conditions warrant such
actions.
EPA will accept comments on the
proposal to partially delete portions of
this site for thirty (30) days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the 1,154 residential
parcel(s) of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site and demonstrates how each activity
completed at the parcels meet the
deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. all appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
33278
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. the remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of [Enter description of
parcel(s)] of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the State
before developing this Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion.
(2) EPA has provided the state 30
working days for review of this notice
prior to publication of it today.
(3) In accordance with the criteria
discussed above, EPA has determined
that no further response is appropriate.
(4) The State of Nebraska, through the
Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality, has concurred with the deletion
of the 1,154 parcel(s) identified in Table
1 and Figure 1of the Omaha Lead
Superfund Site, from the NPL.
(5) Concurrently, with the publication
of this Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion in the Federal Register, a
notice is being published in a major
local newspaper, Omaha World Herald
and Nuestro Mundo. The newspapers
announce the 30-day public comment
period concerning the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion of the Site from the
NPL.
(6) The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket
and made these items available for
public inspection and copying at the
Site information repositories identified
above.
If comments are received within the
30-day comment period on this
document, EPA will evaluate and
respond accordingly to the comments
before making a final decision to delete
the 1,154 parcel(s) indentified in Table
1 and Figure 1. If necessary, EPA will
prepare a Responsiveness Summary to
address any significant public
comments received. After the public
comment period, if EPA determines it is
still appropriate to delete the 1,154
parcel(s) identified in Table 1 and
Figure 1 of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site, the Regional Administrator will
publish a final Notice of Partial Deletion
in the Federal Register. Public notices,
public submissions and copies of the
Responsiveness Summary, if prepared,
will be made available to interested
parties and included in the site
information repositories listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
alter EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a site
from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the 1,154
residential property parcel(s) identified
in Table 1 and Figure 1 of the Omaha
Lead Superfund Site from the NPL:
Site Background and History
The Omaha Lead Site (OLS or Site
[CERCLIS ID #NESFN0703481])
includes surface soils present at
residential properties, child-care
centers, and other residential-type
properties in the city of Omaha, Douglas
County, Nebraska, that have been
contaminated as a result of air emissions
deposition from historic lead smelting
and refining operations. The OLS
encompasses the eastern portion of the
greater metropolitan area in Omaha,
Nebraska. The site extends from the
Douglas-Sarpy County line on the south,
north to Read Street and from the
Missouri River on the east to 56th Street
on the west. The Site is centered around
downtown Omaha, Nebraska, where two
former lead-processing facilities
operated. American Smelting and
Refining Company, Inc. (ASARCO)
operated a lead refinery at 500 Douglas
Street in Omaha, Nebraska, for over 125
years. Aaron Ferer & Sons Company
(Aaron Ferer), and later the Gould
Electronics, Inc., (Gould) operated lead
battery recycling plant were located at
555 Farnam Street.
Both ASARCO and Aaron Ferer/
Gould facilities released lead-containing
particulates into the atmosphere from
their smokestacks which were deposited
on surrounding residential properties.
Douglas County Health Department
(DCHD) monitored ambient air quality
around the ASARCO facility beginning
in 1984. This air monitoring routinely
measured ambient air lead
concentrations in excess of the ambient
air standard.
The DCHD has compiled statistics on
the results of blood lead screening of
children less than seven years of age for
more than 25 years. Blood lead
screening of children living in zip codes
located east of 45th Street have
consistently exceeded the 10 microgram
per deciliter (mg/dl) health-based
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
threshold more frequently than children
living elsewhere in the county.
In 1998, the Omaha City Council
requested assistance from the EPA to
address the high frequency of children
found with elevated blood lead levels by
the DCHD. At that time, the EPA began
investigating the lead contamination in
the Omaha area under the authority of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA).
The OLS includes those residential
properties where the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
determines through soil sampling that
soil lead levels represent an
unacceptable risk to human health.
Residential properties where soil
sampling indicates that soil lead
concentrations are below a level that
represent an unacceptable risk, they are
not considered part of the Site.
Residential properties include those
with high accessibility to sensitive
populations (children seven years of age
and younger [0 to 84 months] and
pregnant or nursing women). These
types of properties include single and
multi-family dwellings, apartment
complexes, child-care facilities, vacant
lots in residential areas, schools,
churches, community centers, parks,
greenways, and any other areas where
children may be exposed to site-related
contaminated media. Commercial and
industrial properties are also excluded
from the defined Site. The EPA
established a 27 square-mile Final Focus
Area to evaluate potentially impacted
properties.
The OLS was proposed to be included
on the National Priorities List (NPL) on
February 26, 2002 (67 FR 8836). The
Site was listed on the NPL on April 30,
2003 (68 FR 23094).
The residential properties proposed
for partial deletion were addressed
under both removal and remedial
authority. Regardless of the authority
used for the remediation of yards, the
cleanup levels for soils (developed
using the IEUBK model) for all the
properties proposed for deletion are the
same. The response decision documents
and activities will be discussed in the
following sections.
Removal Activities
The EPA began sampling residential
properties that were used to provide
licensed child-care services in March
1999. Due to the high concentrations of
lead detected in yard soils, the EPA
initiated a removal action to address
lead-contaminated soils that exceed
criteria for a time-critical removal action
in 1999. The removal response involves
the excavation and replacement of lead-
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
contaminated soil where action levels
identified in the Action Memorandum
are exceeded. These response actions
levels were:
• A child seven years of age or
younger (0 to 84 months) residing at the
property is identified with an elevated
blood level exceeding 10 mg/dl and any
non-foundation sample collected from
the property exceeds 400 ppm;
• A property is a child-care facility,
and any non-foundation sample
collected from the property exceeds 400
ppm; or
• Any non-foundation sampled
exceeds 1,200 ppm at any residential or
residential-type property.
A second removal action was initiated
in August 2002 with the signing of a
second Action Memorandum. This
second removal action included all
other residential type properties where
the maximum non-foundation soil lead
concentration exceeded an action level
of 2,500 ppm. The 2002 Action
Memorandum explicitly identifies the
possibility of lead-based paint as a
potential contributor to lead
contamination of soils within 30 inches
of the foundation of a painted structure.
Because of the potential contribution of
deteriorating lead-based paint near the
foundations of structures, the soil lead
level in the drip zone (areas near
structure foundations) alone would not
trigger soil removal. However, if any
mid-yard soil sample exceeded the
action level, soil from all areas of the
property exceeding the 400 ppm
cleanup level would be removed and
replaced, including drip zone soils if
they exceeded 400 ppm.
Properties determined to be eligible
for response under either of the Action
Memoranda had soils with lead
concentrations greater than the cleanup
level excavated and replaced with clean
soil and disturbed areas were
revegetated. The action level, which
triggered response for typical residential
properties under the second removal
action, was reduced to 1,200 ppm in
November 2003. In 2005, the two
removal actions were combined into a
single response. Throughout the
implementation of both removal actions,
the lead cleanup level remained at 400
ppm.
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Thoughout the implementation of the
removal action, lead levels in residential
soils were evaluated and actions were
taken where action levels were
exceeded, per the removal Action
memoranda. A Human Health Risk
Assessment was developed for the site
using site-specific information collected
during the OLS Remedial Investigation.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
Lead was identified in the risk
assessment as the primary contaminant
of concern. Arsenic was also identified
as a potential contaminant of concern,
but was eliminated after considering its
relatively low overall risk to residents
and lack of connection to the release
from the industrial sources being
addressed by this Superfund action.
The risk assessment for lead focused
on young children under the age of
seven (0 to 84 months) who are site
residents. Young children are most
susceptible to lead exposure because
they have higher contact rates with soil
or dust, absorb lead more readily than
adults, and are more sensitive to the
adverse effects of lead than are older
children and adults. The effect of
greatest concern in children is
impairment of the nervous system,
including learning deficits, lowered
intelligence, and adverse effects on
behavior. The Integrated Exposure
Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) model for
lead in children was used to evaluate
the risks posed to young children (0 to
84 months) as a result of the lead
contamination at the site. Because lead
does not have a nationally-approved
reference dose (RfD), cancer slope
factor, or other accepted toxicological
factor which can be used to assess risk,
standard risk assessment methods
cannot be used to evaluate the health
risks associated with lead
contamination. The modeling results
determined that there was an
unacceptable risk to young children
from exposure to soils above 400 ppm.
In October 2008, EPA released a draft
Final Remedial Investigation, which
presented results of all site
investigations including soil sampling
performed at more than 35,000
residential properties. Based on the
2008 data set, EPA established the Final
Focus Area for the Site, which defined
the area of residential properties that are
targeted for sampling. This area is
generally bounded by Read Street to the
north, 56th Street to the west, Harrison
Street (Sarpy County line) to the south,
and the Missouri River to the east, and
encompasses 17,290 acres (27.0 square
miles).
Through completion of the OLS Final
Remedial Investigation, soil sampling
had been completed at 37,076
residential properties, including 34,565
within the Final Focus Area’s boundary.
In total, 34.2 percent of properties
sampled through completion of the 2008
RI had at least one mid-yard sample
with a soil lead level exceeding 400
ppm. Based on the data trends, the OLS
Final Feasibility Study (FS) estimates
that soil lead levels will exceed 400
ppm at a total of 14,577 properties when
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33279
soil sampling is completed at all
properties within the Final Focus Area.
In addition to soil sampling, 159
residences were sampled during the
OLS Remedial Investigation for interior
dust to support the OLS Human Health
Risk Assessment conducted by the EPA
and the Nebraska Health and Human
Services System. The EPA recognizes
that there may be additional sources of
lead exposure to residents at the site.
These other sources, which could
include interior and exterior lead-based
paint and drinking water, are generally
outside the scope of CERCLA response
authority. The focus of the EPA
sampling efforts focused on leadcontaminated surface soils related to
historic industrial emissions at the site,
in accordance with procedures
established in the EPA Residential Sites
Handbook. The handbook does allow for
characterization of potential sources of
lead exposure in addition to soil and
interior dust. In accordance with the
EPA Residential Sites Handbook, the
selected remedy in this ROD includes
an expanded sampling program to
characterize other potential lead
exposure sources in addition to soil and
interior dust.
Selected Remedy
As the soil cleanup under CERCLA
removal authority was ongoing,
planning for continued response under
CERCLA remedial authority was
proceeding. EPA organized the work
remaining following completion of
CERCLA removal response into these
two operable units:
• Operable Unit 1: Response at high
child impact properties and the most
highly contaminated OLS properties
exceeding 800 ppm soil lead.
• Operable Unit 2: Response at
remaining properties that exceed riskbased soil lead levels established during
final remedy selection process.
For OU1, EPA selected an interim
remedy on December 15, 2004. The
Remedial Action Objective was to
reduce the risk of exposure of young
children to lead such that an individual
child, or group of similarly exposed
children, have no greater than a 5
percent chance of having a blood-lead
concentration exceeding 10 mg/dl. The
selected remedy included:
• Excavation and replacement of soils
at properties with greatest human health
risk
Æ Excavation of soils exceeding 800
ppm at any residential-type property
Æ Excavation of soils exceeding 400
ppm in high child-impact areas
Æ Excavation of soils exceeding 400
ppm at properties with a child
exhibiting an elevated blood-lead level
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
33280
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
• Final management of excavated
materials
• Stabilization of loose and flaking
exterior lead-based paint
• High efficiency interior cleaning
• Participation in comprehensive
program addressing all potential lead
sources
• Health Education
The pre-established soil remediation
level of 400 ppm was determined to be
the cleanup level for this interim
remedial action. In order to prevent the
re-contamination of the clean soil
placed in yards after excavation, loose
and flaking exterior lead-based paint
that threatens the continued
protectiveness of the remedy at these
properties will be stabilized on affected
structures prior to soil excavation. Only
those homes and other structures where
lead-based paint is visibly flaking and
deteriorating will be addressed. At
residences where soil cleanup actions
are conducted, sampling will be
performed to assess lead concentrations
and loadings in interior dust. Homes
that exceed the EPA and HUD standards
for lead in interior dust will be eligible
for a thorough interior cleaning using
high-efficiency equipment. Interior
cleaning of affected residences will be
provided, in accordance with HUD
procedures, on a voluntary basis for
willing residents, after the soil cleanup
is completed in the yard.
For OU2, EPA selected a final site
remedy on May 13. 2009. The Remedial
Action Objective is to reduce the risk of
exposure of young children to lead such
that an individual child, or group of
similarly exposed children, have no
greater than a 5 percent chance of
having a blood-lead concentration
exceeding 10 mg/dl.
The selected final remedy continues
the ongoing remedial response being
implemented under the December 15,
2004, Interim ROD for the OLS with the
following modifications:
• The final OLS soil lead action level
was lowered to 400 ppm for all
residential and residential-type
properties. High child impact properties
continue to be prioritized for response.
• Soil sampling will continue to
determine eligibility for remedial action
at properties inside the Final Focus
Area where sampling has not been
performed. Soil sampling, outside the
focus area, will be discontinued unless
requested. Requests for soil sampling
outside the focus area will be
considered by EPA and decisions made
on a case-by-case basis.
• An institutional control involving
the operation of a local lead hazard
registry containing information about
the status of EPA investigation and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
response and other lead hazards
identified at individual Omaha
properties.
• Participating residents at eligible
properties will be offered highefficiency household vacuum
equipment, training on the maintenance
and importance of proper usage, and
education on mitigation of household
lead hazards. In addition, samples of
interior dust are collected and the
results provided to the residents.
Residents at properties qualifying for
soil remediation will be offered interior
dust response. The interior dust
response is not mandatory and the
resident may choose to decline. Dust
and interior floor wipe sampling are
performed when access is granted. The
analytical data is provided to the
resident/tenant and informs them if
HUD criteria are exceeded. Follow-up
efforts are conducted by the Douglas
County Health Department at any
residence that has interior dust levels
exceeding HUD criteria.
Response Actions
The initial EPA response was
conducted under CERCLA removal
authority. In 2005, following issuance of
the Interim Record of Decision, the
action level for removal response during
the transitional period was lowered to
800 ppm for consistency with the
upcoming remedial response.
Beginning with the construction
season of 2005, the scope of the EPA
response was expanded under the 2004
Interim ROD to include: (1) Stabilization
of deteriorating exterior lead-based
paint at properties where the continued
effectiveness of the soil remediation was
threatened, (2) response to interior dust
at properties where interior dust lead
levels exceeded appropriate criteria, (3)
public health education, and (4)
participation in a comprehensive
remedy with other agencies and
organizations that addresses all
identified lead hazards in the Omaha
community.
Excavation and Replacement of Soils
Excavation of soils was accomplished
using lightweight excavation equipment
and hand tools the portions of the yard
where the surface soil exceeded 400
ppm lead. Excavation continued in all
quadrants, play zones, and drip zone
areas exceeding 400 ppm lead until the
residual lead concentration measured at
the exposed surface of the excavation
was less than 400 ppm in the initial
foot, or less than 1,200 ppm at depths
greater than one foot. Typically, soil
excavation depths were between 6 and
10 inches in depth. Soils in garden areas
were excavated until reaching a residual
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
concentration of less than 400 ppm in
the initial two feet from the original
surface, or less than 1,200 ppm at
depths greater than two feet.
After confirmation sampling verified
that cleanup goals were met, the
excavated areas were backfilled with
clean soil to original grade and sod was
placed over the remediated areas.
EPA did not utilize soil from any
protected Loess Hills area as backfill for
the OLS.
The contaminated soils removed from
the remediated yards was stockpiled at
staging areas, sampled and then
transported to an off-site Subtitle D
solid waste landfill for use as daily
cover and/or disposal.
Stabilization of Loose and Flaking
Exterior Lead-Based Paints
The lead-based paint assessment
protocol, presented in the Final LeadBased Paint Recontamination Study
Report prepared for the OLS, was used
to determine eligibility for exterior leadbased paint stabilization at those
properties where soil lead
concentrations exceed 400 ppm. At
those properties where the exterior leadbased paint assessment identified a
threat from deteriorating paint to the
continued protectiveness of the soil
remediation, the owner of the property
was offered stabilization of painted
surfaces on structures located on the
property. Exterior lead-based paint
stabilization is not mandatory and was
provided to those qualifying property
owners who choose to have their
exterior paint stabilized. Lead –safe
practices identified in the EPA’s
Renovate, Repair and Painting Rule
were followed. Removal of loose and
flaking lead-based paint was performed
using lead-safe practices, which
includes wet scraping and collection of
paint chips using plastic sheeting.
Scraped areas were primed and all
previously painted surfaces had two
coats of paint applied.
Interior Dust Response
As part of the final remedy, residents
at eligible properties are given the
opportunity to have interior dust
sampled. Upon agreement, the residents
are given a high-efficiency household
vacuum cleaner, training on the
maintenance and the importance of
proper usage of the vacuum, and
education on mitigation of household
lead hazards. In addition, samples of
interior dust are collected and analyzed
for lead. The resident/tenant is provided
the analytical results. The letter
transmitting the data also indicates
whether the interior dust collected has
lead above the HUD criteria.
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
The Douglas County Health
Department provides the training and
education regarding the need to mitigate
interior dust. Interior dust response is
offered to all residents with a qualifying
property (soil lead concentrations
greater than 400 parts per million). The
resident does not have to agree and
participation in the dust response is
voluntary by the residents. At properties
where soil remediation has been
conducted, interior floor wipe sampling
indicates that, typically, HUD criteria
are not exceeded.
Exterior lead-based paint stabilization
and interior dust response were
provided retroactively to properties
where soil cleanups have been
performed under CERCLA removal
authority, as well as to properties
addressed under CERCLA remedial
authority.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Participation in Comprehensive
Program to Address Potential Lead
Sources
There are a number of identified lead
hazards within the OLS, not all of
which are connected to the contaminant
source of OLS. In order to better address
all potential lead sources within the
OLS, a health education program was
developed and continues to be
implemented to raise awareness and
mitigate exposure. An active
educational program continues in
cooperation with agencies and
organizations that includes ATSDR,
NDHHS, DCHD, local non-governmental
organizations, and other interested
parties throughout the duration of the
EPA remedial action.
Health Education
The following, although not an
exhaustive list, indicate the types of
educational activities provided at the
Site:
• Support for in-home assessments
for children identified with elevated
blood lead levels.
• Development and implementation
of lead poisoning prevention curriculum
in schools.
• Support for efforts to increase
community-wide blood lead monitoring.
• Physicians’ education for diagnosis,
treatment, and surveillance of lead
exposure.
• Operation of EPA Public
Information Centers to distribute
information and respond to questions
about the EPA response activities and
lead hazards in the community.
• Use of mass media (television,
radio, internet, print media, etc.) to
distribute health education messages.
Development and distribution of
informational tools such as fact sheets,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:18 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
brochures, refrigerator magnets, etc., to
inform the public about lead hazards
and measures that can be taken to avoid
or eliminate exposure.
Institutional Controls
The lead hazard registry, identified as
the Omaha Lead Education and
Discussion (Omaha LEAD), provides
interested parties with on-line access to
lead hazard information at individual
properties, including the status of EPA
investigations and response actions and
other lead hazard information including
HUD-funded lead hazard control and
abatement activities. Information
available through the lead hazard
registry includes initial soil lead
sampling results from individual
quadrants and residual soil lead levels
remaining at properties following soil
remediation. EPA notifies residents and
property owners about the information
that is available through the lead hazard
registry as part of the transmittal sent at
the completion of soil remediation at
individual properties. Residents and
property owners will receive a second
notification when the lead hazard
registry is complete and operational at
the conclusion of the OLS remedial
action. The final notification will
describe information available through
the lead hazard registry and again
advise property owners that records of
potential lead hazards received from
EPA should be retained for compliance
with state and Federal disclosure
requirements.
After the issuance of the 2009 Final
ROD, response efforts identified as
Operable Unit 2 began. Operable Unit 2
work efforts began with the 2009
construction season and included all
remaining remedial response work at
the OLS. All work remaining under
Operable Unit 1 not completed was
performed under Operable Unit 2.
Properties identified with time-critical
conditions, including residences with
elevated blood-lead levels in children
and high child-impact areas, continue to
receive prioritized response during the
final remedy implemented under
Operable Unit 2.
The precise scope of work remaining
to be completed at the OLS site (under
OU1 and OU2) is not known with
certainty since sampling has not been
completed to determine eligibility for
soil remediation, exterior lead-based
paint stabilization, and interior dust
response. However, those properties not
addressed to date are not part of this
partial deletion.
Information on activities completed at
each property can be found in the
deletion docket and at the Omaha Lead
Education and Discussion
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33281
(‘‘OmahaLEAD’’) Web site. Omaha
LEAD is a Geographic Information
Systems (‘‘GIS’’)-based Web site
(www.omahalead.org) that increases the
public’s awareness of lead hazards and
acts of a as a virtual library of lead
hazard mitigation activities, including
activities conducted by private property
owners, the City of Omaha, and the US
EPA. The Web site is operational.
Cleanup Goals
Final cleanup levels for lead in
residential soil at Superfund sites
generally are based on a consideration
of the PRG derived by the IEUBK model
results, taking the uncertainty in the
value into account, and also considering
the nine criteria in accordance with the
CERCLA regulations contained in the
National Contingency Plan (NCP).
Under most circumstances, EPA selects
a residential soil lead cleanup level that
is within the range of 400 ppm to 1,200
ppm. EPA selected a soil action level for
lead in residential soils at the site of 400
ppm.
For lead contamination that may be
addressed under CERCLA, these
cleanup levels allow for unrestricted
use. Therefore, operation and
maintenance, institutional controls and
five-year reviews are not required for
these parcels.
Community Involvement
EPA has worked extensively with the
Omaha community through a variety of
communication vehicles, including but
not limited to local speaking
engagements, participation in citizens’
groups and city council meetings, local
public access television, public service
announcements on local cable
television, coverage on radio and
television and in local and national
newspapers, mass mailings of
informational materials, public outreach
by telephone, by conducting public
meetings, and through the EPA Web
site.
EPA has been performing outreach to
Omaha citizens, elected officials, school
officials, health officials, the media,
nonprofit groups, and others since
becoming involved in the project in
1998 in an effort to convey information
about the hazards of lead poisoning,
particularly how lead affects the health
of children. The EPA has participated in
numerous formal and informal meetings
to explain EPA’s role and commitment
in Omaha, convey information about the
Superfund process, and provide general
information about the site and lead
contamination. EPA responds to
inquiries on a daily basis regarding the
site and individual property owner’s
sampling results.
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
33282
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 107 / Tuesday, June 4, 2013 / Proposed Rules
In January 2004, a Community
Advisory Group (CAG) was formed for
the site. A CAG is a committee, task
force, or board made up of residents
affected by a Superfund site. They
provided a public forum where
representatives of diverse community
interests can present and discuss their
needs and concerns related to the site
and the cleanup process. The last CAG
meeting was held in October 2011. A
new group, Child Lead Poisoning
Prevention Group, formed. The first
meeting of the Child Lead Poisoning
Group was held at City Hall in May
2012. The purpose of the new group
remains the same.
Determination That the Criteria for
Deletion Have Been Met
In accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e), Region 7 of the EPA finds
that the 1,154 residential parcels of the
Omaha Lead site (the subject of this
deletion) meet the substantive criteria
for partial NPL deletions. EPA has
consulted with and has the concurrence
of the State of Nebraska. All responsible
parties or other persons have
implemented all appropriate response
actions required. All appropriate Fundfinanced response under CERCLA has
been implemented, and no further
response action by responsible parties is
appropriate.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Superfund.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2013–12969 Filed 6–3–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[FWS–R6–ES–2013–0068]
RIN 1018–AY56
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Revision of Critical Habitat
for Salt Creek Tiger Beetle
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Jun 03, 2013
Jkt 229001
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, propose to revise
critical habitat for the Salt Creek tiger
beetle (Cicindela nevadica lincolniana)
under the Endangered Species Act. If we
finalize this rule as proposed, it would
extend the Act’s protections to lands
designated as revised critical habitat for
this subspecies. This designation fulfills
our obligations under a settlement
agreement. The effect of this regulation
is to conserve the habitat of Salt Creek
tiger beetles in eastern Nebraska under
the Endangered Species Act.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
August 5, 2013. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES
section, below) must be received by
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of the closing
date. We must receive requests for
public hearings, in writing, at the
address shown in ADDRESSES by July 19,
2013.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2013–
0068, which is the docket number for
this rulemaking. You may submit a
comment by clicking on ‘‘Comment
Now!’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R6–ES–2013–
0068; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS
2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information).
The coordinates or plot points or both
from which the maps are generated are
included in the administrative record
for this critical habitat designation and
are available at https://www.fws.gov/
nebraskaes, or https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2013–0068, and at the
Nebraska Ecological Services Field
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). Any additional tools or
supporting information that we may
develop for this critical habitat
designation will also be available at the
Fish and Wildlife Service Web site and
Field Office set out above, and may also
be included in the preamble and/or at
https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael D. George, Field Supervisor,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Nebraska Ecological Services Field
Office, 203 W 2nd St., Grand Island, NE
68801; telephone 308–382–6468. If you
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Why We Need To Publish a Rule
This is a proposed rule to revise the
designation of critical habitat for the
endangered Salt Creek tiger beetle. This
revision will fulfill the terms of a
settlement agreement reached on June 7,
2011 (see Previous Federal Actions).
Under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), any species that is determined
to be threatened or endangered requires
critical habitat to be designated, to the
maximum extent prudent and
determinable. Designations and
revisions of critical habitat can only be
completed by issuing a rule.
This Rule Will Propose Revised Critical
Habitat for the Endangered Salt Creek
Tiger Beetle
In total, we are proposing 1,110 acres
(ac) (449 hectares (ha)) for designation
as critical habitat for the Salt Creek tiger
beetle in Lancaster and Saunders
Counties in Nebraska. This proposed
revised critical habitat includes saline
wetlands and streams associated with
Little Salt Creek and encompasses all
three habitat areas occupied by the
subspecies at the time of listing. It also
includes saline wetlands and streams
associated with Rock Creek and Oak
Creek (Capitol Beach) that are currently
unoccupied, but supported the
subspecies less than 20 years ago. Our
designation also includes segments of
Haines Branch Creek because this area
has the potential to provide suitable
habitat for the Salt Creek tiger beetle
and its inclusion will reduce the risk of
species extinction by providing
redundancy in available habitat
throughout multiple creeks. Due to the
presence of suitable habitat, we believe
that the Salt Creek tiger beetle occurred
in this area historically; however, they
have not been documented in this
location due to minimal survey effort
relative to the annual surveys done at
Little Salt, Rock, and Oak Creeks.
The Basis for Our Action
Under the Act, any species that is
determined to be a threatened or
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33276-33282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12969]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2003-0010; FRL-9818-6]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 7 is issuing
a Notice of Intent to Delete the 1,154 parcels (of the Omaha Lead
Superfund Site (Site) located in the eastern part of the city of Omaha,
Nebraska, from the National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public
comments on this proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to
section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP).
The EPA and the State of Nebraska, through the
[[Page 33277]]
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ), have determined
that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA and other lead
abatement activities at these identified parcels have been completed.
However, this deletion does not preclude future actions under
Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to soils, dust and deteriorating
lead-based paint, where applicable, of the 1,154 residential parcels.
These types of properties include single and multi-family dwellings,
apartment complexes, child-care facilities, vacant lots in residential
areas, schools, churches, community centers, parks, greenways, and any
other areas where children may be exposed to site-related contaminated
media. A listing of the parcels by address can be found in Table 1 in
the deletion docket. Figure 1 also shows a map of the Omaha Lead site
and identifies the parcels proposed for deletion. Approximately 12,800
residential parcels and associated soil, dust and deteriorating lead-
based paint will remain on the NPL and is/are not being considered for
deletion as part of this action.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 5, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2003-0010, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments.
Email: france-isetts.pauletta@epa.gov Fax: 913-551-7066
Mail: Environmental Protection Agency, 8600 NE Underground
Dr., Pillar 253,, Kansas City, Missouri 64161 Attention: Pauletta
France-Isetts, Superfund Division Hand delivery: 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
2003-0010. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket:
All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
EPA Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard., Lenexa, Kansas 66219 open
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
EPA Public Information Center (north), 3040 Lake Street, Omaha, NE
68111 open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. call (402) 991-9583 to ensure staff
are available; EPA Public Information Center (south) 4909 S. 25th
Street, Omaha, NE 68107, open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. call (402) 731-3045
to ensure staff are available; W. Dale Clark Library, 215 S. 15th
Street; Omaha, NE 68102
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauletta France-Isetts, Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7,
Superfund Division, 8600 NE Underground Drive, Pillar 253, Kansas City,
Missouri 64161, (913)-339-8105, email: france-isetts.pauletta@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 7 announces its intent to delete the 1,154 residential
parcel(s) (identified in Table 1 and Figure 1 of the deletion docket)
of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site (Site), from the National Priorities
List (NPL) and request public comment on this proposed action. The NPL
constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300, which is the Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA maintains the NPL as those sites that appear to present a
significant risk to public health, welfare, or the environment. Sites
on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions financed by the
Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This partial deletion of the
Omaha Lead Superfund Site is proposed in accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e) and is consistent with the Notice of Policy Change: Partial
Deletion of Sites Listed on the National Priorities List. 60 FR 55466
(Nov. 1, 1995). As described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of
a site deleted from the NPL remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial
action if future conditions warrant such actions.
EPA will accept comments on the proposal to partially delete
portions of this site for thirty (30) days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the 1,154 residential parcel(s)
of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site and demonstrates how each activity
completed at the parcels meet the deletion criteria.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. all appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
[[Page 33278]]
action by responsible parties is appropriate; or
iii. the remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of [Enter description of
parcel(s)] of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the State before developing this Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion.
(2) EPA has provided the state 30 working days for review of this
notice prior to publication of it today.
(3) In accordance with the criteria discussed above, EPA has
determined that no further response is appropriate.
(4) The State of Nebraska, through the Nebraska Department of
Environmental Quality, has concurred with the deletion of the 1,154
parcel(s) identified in Table 1 and Figure 1of the Omaha Lead Superfund
Site, from the NPL.
(5) Concurrently, with the publication of this Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion in the Federal Register, a notice is being published
in a major local newspaper, Omaha World Herald and Nuestro Mundo. The
newspapers announce the 30-day public comment period concerning the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
(6) The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket and made these items available
for public inspection and copying at the Site information repositories
identified above.
If comments are received within the 30-day comment period on this
document, EPA will evaluate and respond accordingly to the comments
before making a final decision to delete the 1,154 parcel(s)
indentified in Table 1 and Figure 1. If necessary, EPA will prepare a
Responsiveness Summary to address any significant public comments
received. After the public comment period, if EPA determines it is
still appropriate to delete the 1,154 parcel(s) identified in Table 1
and Figure 1 of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site, the Regional
Administrator will publish a final Notice of Partial Deletion in the
Federal Register. Public notices, public submissions and copies of the
Responsiveness Summary, if prepared, will be made available to
interested parties and included in the site information repositories
listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for future
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
1,154 residential property parcel(s) identified in Table 1 and Figure 1
of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site from the NPL:
Site Background and History
The Omaha Lead Site (OLS or Site [CERCLIS ID
NESFN0703481]) includes surface soils present at residential
properties, child-care centers, and other residential-type properties
in the city of Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, that have been
contaminated as a result of air emissions deposition from historic lead
smelting and refining operations. The OLS encompasses the eastern
portion of the greater metropolitan area in Omaha, Nebraska. The site
extends from the Douglas-Sarpy County line on the south, north to Read
Street and from the Missouri River on the east to 56th Street on the
west. The Site is centered around downtown Omaha, Nebraska, where two
former lead-processing facilities operated. American Smelting and
Refining Company, Inc. (ASARCO) operated a lead refinery at 500 Douglas
Street in Omaha, Nebraska, for over 125 years. Aaron Ferer & Sons
Company (Aaron Ferer), and later the Gould Electronics, Inc., (Gould)
operated lead battery recycling plant were located at 555 Farnam
Street.
Both ASARCO and Aaron Ferer/Gould facilities released lead-
containing particulates into the atmosphere from their smokestacks
which were deposited on surrounding residential properties. Douglas
County Health Department (DCHD) monitored ambient air quality around
the ASARCO facility beginning in 1984. This air monitoring routinely
measured ambient air lead concentrations in excess of the ambient air
standard.
The DCHD has compiled statistics on the results of blood lead
screening of children less than seven years of age for more than 25
years. Blood lead screening of children living in zip codes located
east of 45th Street have consistently exceeded the 10 microgram per
deciliter ([mu]g/dl) health-based threshold more frequently than
children living elsewhere in the county.
In 1998, the Omaha City Council requested assistance from the EPA
to address the high frequency of children found with elevated blood
lead levels by the DCHD. At that time, the EPA began investigating the
lead contamination in the Omaha area under the authority of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA).
The OLS includes those residential properties where the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) determines through soil sampling
that soil lead levels represent an unacceptable risk to human health.
Residential properties where soil sampling indicates that soil lead
concentrations are below a level that represent an unacceptable risk,
they are not considered part of the Site. Residential properties
include those with high accessibility to sensitive populations
(children seven years of age and younger [0 to 84 months] and pregnant
or nursing women). These types of properties include single and multi-
family dwellings, apartment complexes, child-care facilities, vacant
lots in residential areas, schools, churches, community centers, parks,
greenways, and any other areas where children may be exposed to site-
related contaminated media. Commercial and industrial properties are
also excluded from the defined Site. The EPA established a 27 square-
mile Final Focus Area to evaluate potentially impacted properties.
The OLS was proposed to be included on the National Priorities List
(NPL) on February 26, 2002 (67 FR 8836). The Site was listed on the NPL
on April 30, 2003 (68 FR 23094).
The residential properties proposed for partial deletion were
addressed under both removal and remedial authority. Regardless of the
authority used for the remediation of yards, the cleanup levels for
soils (developed using the IEUBK model) for all the properties proposed
for deletion are the same. The response decision documents and
activities will be discussed in the following sections.
Removal Activities
The EPA began sampling residential properties that were used to
provide licensed child-care services in March 1999. Due to the high
concentrations of lead detected in yard soils, the EPA initiated a
removal action to address lead-contaminated soils that exceed criteria
for a time-critical removal action in 1999. The removal response
involves the excavation and replacement of lead-
[[Page 33279]]
contaminated soil where action levels identified in the Action
Memorandum are exceeded. These response actions levels were:
A child seven years of age or younger (0 to 84 months)
residing at the property is identified with an elevated blood level
exceeding 10 [mu]g/dl and any non-foundation sample collected from the
property exceeds 400 ppm;
A property is a child-care facility, and any non-
foundation sample collected from the property exceeds 400 ppm; or
Any non-foundation sampled exceeds 1,200 ppm at any
residential or residential-type property.
A second removal action was initiated in August 2002 with the
signing of a second Action Memorandum. This second removal action
included all other residential type properties where the maximum non-
foundation soil lead concentration exceeded an action level of 2,500
ppm. The 2002 Action Memorandum explicitly identifies the possibility
of lead-based paint as a potential contributor to lead contamination of
soils within 30 inches of the foundation of a painted structure.
Because of the potential contribution of deteriorating lead-based paint
near the foundations of structures, the soil lead level in the drip
zone (areas near structure foundations) alone would not trigger soil
removal. However, if any mid-yard soil sample exceeded the action
level, soil from all areas of the property exceeding the 400 ppm
cleanup level would be removed and replaced, including drip zone soils
if they exceeded 400 ppm.
Properties determined to be eligible for response under either of
the Action Memoranda had soils with lead concentrations greater than
the cleanup level excavated and replaced with clean soil and disturbed
areas were revegetated. The action level, which triggered response for
typical residential properties under the second removal action, was
reduced to 1,200 ppm in November 2003. In 2005, the two removal actions
were combined into a single response. Throughout the implementation of
both removal actions, the lead cleanup level remained at 400 ppm.
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Thoughout the implementation of the removal action, lead levels in
residential soils were evaluated and actions were taken where action
levels were exceeded, per the removal Action memoranda. A Human Health
Risk Assessment was developed for the site using site-specific
information collected during the OLS Remedial Investigation. Lead was
identified in the risk assessment as the primary contaminant of
concern. Arsenic was also identified as a potential contaminant of
concern, but was eliminated after considering its relatively low
overall risk to residents and lack of connection to the release from
the industrial sources being addressed by this Superfund action.
The risk assessment for lead focused on young children under the
age of seven (0 to 84 months) who are site residents. Young children
are most susceptible to lead exposure because they have higher contact
rates with soil or dust, absorb lead more readily than adults, and are
more sensitive to the adverse effects of lead than are older children
and adults. The effect of greatest concern in children is impairment of
the nervous system, including learning deficits, lowered intelligence,
and adverse effects on behavior. The Integrated Exposure Uptake
Biokinetic (IEUBK) model for lead in children was used to evaluate the
risks posed to young children (0 to 84 months) as a result of the lead
contamination at the site. Because lead does not have a nationally-
approved reference dose (RfD), cancer slope factor, or other accepted
toxicological factor which can be used to assess risk, standard risk
assessment methods cannot be used to evaluate the health risks
associated with lead contamination. The modeling results determined
that there was an unacceptable risk to young children from exposure to
soils above 400 ppm.
In October 2008, EPA released a draft Final Remedial Investigation,
which presented results of all site investigations including soil
sampling performed at more than 35,000 residential properties. Based on
the 2008 data set, EPA established the Final Focus Area for the Site,
which defined the area of residential properties that are targeted for
sampling. This area is generally bounded by Read Street to the north,
56th Street to the west, Harrison Street (Sarpy County line) to the
south, and the Missouri River to the east, and encompasses 17,290 acres
(27.0 square miles).
Through completion of the OLS Final Remedial Investigation, soil
sampling had been completed at 37,076 residential properties, including
34,565 within the Final Focus Area's boundary. In total, 34.2 percent
of properties sampled through completion of the 2008 RI had at least
one mid-yard sample with a soil lead level exceeding 400 ppm. Based on
the data trends, the OLS Final Feasibility Study (FS) estimates that
soil lead levels will exceed 400 ppm at a total of 14,577 properties
when soil sampling is completed at all properties within the Final
Focus Area.
In addition to soil sampling, 159 residences were sampled during
the OLS Remedial Investigation for interior dust to support the OLS
Human Health Risk Assessment conducted by the EPA and the Nebraska
Health and Human Services System. The EPA recognizes that there may be
additional sources of lead exposure to residents at the site. These
other sources, which could include interior and exterior lead-based
paint and drinking water, are generally outside the scope of CERCLA
response authority. The focus of the EPA sampling efforts focused on
lead-contaminated surface soils related to historic industrial
emissions at the site, in accordance with procedures established in the
EPA Residential Sites Handbook. The handbook does allow for
characterization of potential sources of lead exposure in addition to
soil and interior dust. In accordance with the EPA Residential Sites
Handbook, the selected remedy in this ROD includes an expanded sampling
program to characterize other potential lead exposure sources in
addition to soil and interior dust.
Selected Remedy
As the soil cleanup under CERCLA removal authority was ongoing,
planning for continued response under CERCLA remedial authority was
proceeding. EPA organized the work remaining following completion of
CERCLA removal response into these two operable units:
Operable Unit 1: Response at high child impact properties
and the most highly contaminated OLS properties exceeding 800 ppm soil
lead.
Operable Unit 2: Response at remaining properties that
exceed risk-based soil lead levels established during final remedy
selection process.
For OU1, EPA selected an interim remedy on December 15, 2004. The
Remedial Action Objective was to reduce the risk of exposure of young
children to lead such that an individual child, or group of similarly
exposed children, have no greater than a 5 percent chance of having a
blood-lead concentration exceeding 10 [mu]g/dl. The selected remedy
included:
Excavation and replacement of soils at properties with
greatest human health risk
[cir] Excavation of soils exceeding 800 ppm at any residential-type
property
[cir] Excavation of soils exceeding 400 ppm in high child-impact
areas
[cir] Excavation of soils exceeding 400 ppm at properties with a
child exhibiting an elevated blood-lead level
[[Page 33280]]
Final management of excavated materials
Stabilization of loose and flaking exterior lead-based
paint
High efficiency interior cleaning
Participation in comprehensive program addressing all
potential lead sources
Health Education
The pre-established soil remediation level of 400 ppm was
determined to be the cleanup level for this interim remedial action. In
order to prevent the re-contamination of the clean soil placed in yards
after excavation, loose and flaking exterior lead-based paint that
threatens the continued protectiveness of the remedy at these
properties will be stabilized on affected structures prior to soil
excavation. Only those homes and other structures where lead-based
paint is visibly flaking and deteriorating will be addressed. At
residences where soil cleanup actions are conducted, sampling will be
performed to assess lead concentrations and loadings in interior dust.
Homes that exceed the EPA and HUD standards for lead in interior dust
will be eligible for a thorough interior cleaning using high-efficiency
equipment. Interior cleaning of affected residences will be provided,
in accordance with HUD procedures, on a voluntary basis for willing
residents, after the soil cleanup is completed in the yard.
For OU2, EPA selected a final site remedy on May 13. 2009. The
Remedial Action Objective is to reduce the risk of exposure of young
children to lead such that an individual child, or group of similarly
exposed children, have no greater than a 5 percent chance of having a
blood-lead concentration exceeding 10 [mu]g/dl.
The selected final remedy continues the ongoing remedial response
being implemented under the December 15, 2004, Interim ROD for the OLS
with the following modifications:
The final OLS soil lead action level was lowered to 400
ppm for all residential and residential-type properties. High child
impact properties continue to be prioritized for response.
Soil sampling will continue to determine eligibility for
remedial action at properties inside the Final Focus Area where
sampling has not been performed. Soil sampling, outside the focus area,
will be discontinued unless requested. Requests for soil sampling
outside the focus area will be considered by EPA and decisions made on
a case-by-case basis.
An institutional control involving the operation of a
local lead hazard registry containing information about the status of
EPA investigation and response and other lead hazards identified at
individual Omaha properties.
Participating residents at eligible properties will be
offered high-efficiency household vacuum equipment, training on the
maintenance and importance of proper usage, and education on mitigation
of household lead hazards. In addition, samples of interior dust are
collected and the results provided to the residents. Residents at
properties qualifying for soil remediation will be offered interior
dust response. The interior dust response is not mandatory and the
resident may choose to decline. Dust and interior floor wipe sampling
are performed when access is granted. The analytical data is provided
to the resident/tenant and informs them if HUD criteria are exceeded.
Follow-up efforts are conducted by the Douglas County Health Department
at any residence that has interior dust levels exceeding HUD criteria.
Response Actions
The initial EPA response was conducted under CERCLA removal
authority. In 2005, following issuance of the Interim Record of
Decision, the action level for removal response during the transitional
period was lowered to 800 ppm for consistency with the upcoming
remedial response.
Beginning with the construction season of 2005, the scope of the
EPA response was expanded under the 2004 Interim ROD to include: (1)
Stabilization of deteriorating exterior lead-based paint at properties
where the continued effectiveness of the soil remediation was
threatened, (2) response to interior dust at properties where interior
dust lead levels exceeded appropriate criteria, (3) public health
education, and (4) participation in a comprehensive remedy with other
agencies and organizations that addresses all identified lead hazards
in the Omaha community.
Excavation and Replacement of Soils
Excavation of soils was accomplished using lightweight excavation
equipment and hand tools the portions of the yard where the surface
soil exceeded 400 ppm lead. Excavation continued in all quadrants, play
zones, and drip zone areas exceeding 400 ppm lead until the residual
lead concentration measured at the exposed surface of the excavation
was less than 400 ppm in the initial foot, or less than 1,200 ppm at
depths greater than one foot. Typically, soil excavation depths were
between 6 and 10 inches in depth. Soils in garden areas were excavated
until reaching a residual concentration of less than 400 ppm in the
initial two feet from the original surface, or less than 1,200 ppm at
depths greater than two feet.
After confirmation sampling verified that cleanup goals were met,
the excavated areas were backfilled with clean soil to original grade
and sod was placed over the remediated areas.
EPA did not utilize soil from any protected Loess Hills area as
backfill for the OLS.
The contaminated soils removed from the remediated yards was
stockpiled at staging areas, sampled and then transported to an off-
site Subtitle D solid waste landfill for use as daily cover and/or
disposal.
Stabilization of Loose and Flaking Exterior Lead-Based Paints
The lead-based paint assessment protocol, presented in the Final
Lead-Based Paint Recontamination Study Report prepared for the OLS, was
used to determine eligibility for exterior lead-based paint
stabilization at those properties where soil lead concentrations exceed
400 ppm. At those properties where the exterior lead-based paint
assessment identified a threat from deteriorating paint to the
continued protectiveness of the soil remediation, the owner of the
property was offered stabilization of painted surfaces on structures
located on the property. Exterior lead-based paint stabilization is not
mandatory and was provided to those qualifying property owners who
choose to have their exterior paint stabilized. Lead -safe practices
identified in the EPA's Renovate, Repair and Painting Rule were
followed. Removal of loose and flaking lead-based paint was performed
using lead-safe practices, which includes wet scraping and collection
of paint chips using plastic sheeting. Scraped areas were primed and
all previously painted surfaces had two coats of paint applied.
Interior Dust Response
As part of the final remedy, residents at eligible properties are
given the opportunity to have interior dust sampled. Upon agreement,
the residents are given a high-efficiency household vacuum cleaner,
training on the maintenance and the importance of proper usage of the
vacuum, and education on mitigation of household lead hazards. In
addition, samples of interior dust are collected and analyzed for lead.
The resident/tenant is provided the analytical results. The letter
transmitting the data also indicates whether the interior dust
collected has lead above the HUD criteria.
[[Page 33281]]
The Douglas County Health Department provides the training and
education regarding the need to mitigate interior dust. Interior dust
response is offered to all residents with a qualifying property (soil
lead concentrations greater than 400 parts per million). The resident
does not have to agree and participation in the dust response is
voluntary by the residents. At properties where soil remediation has
been conducted, interior floor wipe sampling indicates that, typically,
HUD criteria are not exceeded.
Exterior lead-based paint stabilization and interior dust response
were provided retroactively to properties where soil cleanups have been
performed under CERCLA removal authority, as well as to properties
addressed under CERCLA remedial authority.
Participation in Comprehensive Program to Address Potential Lead
Sources
There are a number of identified lead hazards within the OLS, not
all of which are connected to the contaminant source of OLS. In order
to better address all potential lead sources within the OLS, a health
education program was developed and continues to be implemented to
raise awareness and mitigate exposure. An active educational program
continues in cooperation with agencies and organizations that includes
ATSDR, NDHHS, DCHD, local non-governmental organizations, and other
interested parties throughout the duration of the EPA remedial action.
Health Education
The following, although not an exhaustive list, indicate the types
of educational activities provided at the Site:
Support for in-home assessments for children identified
with elevated blood lead levels.
Development and implementation of lead poisoning
prevention curriculum in schools.
Support for efforts to increase community-wide blood lead
monitoring.
Physicians' education for diagnosis, treatment, and
surveillance of lead exposure.
Operation of EPA Public Information Centers to distribute
information and respond to questions about the EPA response activities
and lead hazards in the community.
Use of mass media (television, radio, internet, print
media, etc.) to distribute health education messages.
Development and distribution of informational tools such as fact
sheets, brochures, refrigerator magnets, etc., to inform the public
about lead hazards and measures that can be taken to avoid or eliminate
exposure.
Institutional Controls
The lead hazard registry, identified as the Omaha Lead Education
and Discussion (Omaha LEAD), provides interested parties with on-line
access to lead hazard information at individual properties, including
the status of EPA investigations and response actions and other lead
hazard information including HUD-funded lead hazard control and
abatement activities. Information available through the lead hazard
registry includes initial soil lead sampling results from individual
quadrants and residual soil lead levels remaining at properties
following soil remediation. EPA notifies residents and property owners
about the information that is available through the lead hazard
registry as part of the transmittal sent at the completion of soil
remediation at individual properties. Residents and property owners
will receive a second notification when the lead hazard registry is
complete and operational at the conclusion of the OLS remedial action.
The final notification will describe information available through the
lead hazard registry and again advise property owners that records of
potential lead hazards received from EPA should be retained for
compliance with state and Federal disclosure requirements.
After the issuance of the 2009 Final ROD, response efforts
identified as Operable Unit 2 began. Operable Unit 2 work efforts began
with the 2009 construction season and included all remaining remedial
response work at the OLS. All work remaining under Operable Unit 1 not
completed was performed under Operable Unit 2. Properties identified
with time-critical conditions, including residences with elevated
blood-lead levels in children and high child-impact areas, continue to
receive prioritized response during the final remedy implemented under
Operable Unit 2.
The precise scope of work remaining to be completed at the OLS site
(under OU1 and OU2) is not known with certainty since sampling has not
been completed to determine eligibility for soil remediation, exterior
lead-based paint stabilization, and interior dust response. However,
those properties not addressed to date are not part of this partial
deletion.
Information on activities completed at each property can be found
in the deletion docket and at the Omaha Lead Education and Discussion
(``OmahaLEAD'') Web site. Omaha LEAD is a Geographic Information
Systems (``GIS'')-based Web site (www.omahalead.org) that increases the
public's awareness of lead hazards and acts of a as a virtual library
of lead hazard mitigation activities, including activities conducted by
private property owners, the City of Omaha, and the US EPA. The Web
site is operational.
Cleanup Goals
Final cleanup levels for lead in residential soil at Superfund
sites generally are based on a consideration of the PRG derived by the
IEUBK model results, taking the uncertainty in the value into account,
and also considering the nine criteria in accordance with the CERCLA
regulations contained in the National Contingency Plan (NCP). Under
most circumstances, EPA selects a residential soil lead cleanup level
that is within the range of 400 ppm to 1,200 ppm. EPA selected a soil
action level for lead in residential soils at the site of 400 ppm.
For lead contamination that may be addressed under CERCLA, these
cleanup levels allow for unrestricted use. Therefore, operation and
maintenance, institutional controls and five-year reviews are not
required for these parcels.
Community Involvement
EPA has worked extensively with the Omaha community through a
variety of communication vehicles, including but not limited to local
speaking engagements, participation in citizens' groups and city
council meetings, local public access television, public service
announcements on local cable television, coverage on radio and
television and in local and national newspapers, mass mailings of
informational materials, public outreach by telephone, by conducting
public meetings, and through the EPA Web site.
EPA has been performing outreach to Omaha citizens, elected
officials, school officials, health officials, the media, nonprofit
groups, and others since becoming involved in the project in 1998 in an
effort to convey information about the hazards of lead poisoning,
particularly how lead affects the health of children. The EPA has
participated in numerous formal and informal meetings to explain EPA's
role and commitment in Omaha, convey information about the Superfund
process, and provide general information about the site and lead
contamination. EPA responds to inquiries on a daily basis regarding the
site and individual property owner's sampling results.
[[Page 33282]]
In January 2004, a Community Advisory Group (CAG) was formed for
the site. A CAG is a committee, task force, or board made up of
residents affected by a Superfund site. They provided a public forum
where representatives of diverse community interests can present and
discuss their needs and concerns related to the site and the cleanup
process. The last CAG meeting was held in October 2011. A new group,
Child Lead Poisoning Prevention Group, formed. The first meeting of the
Child Lead Poisoning Group was held at City Hall in May 2012. The
purpose of the new group remains the same.
Determination That the Criteria for Deletion Have Been Met
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), Region 7 of the EPA finds
that the 1,154 residential parcels of the Omaha Lead site (the subject
of this deletion) meet the substantive criteria for partial NPL
deletions. EPA has consulted with and has the concurrence of the State
of Nebraska. All responsible parties or other persons have implemented
all appropriate response actions required. All appropriate Fund-
financed response under CERCLA has been implemented, and no further
response action by responsible parties is appropriate.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Superfund.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757,3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923,
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193.
Dated: May 16, 2013.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2013-12969 Filed 6-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P