Draft 2012 Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports, 32377-32378 [2013-12869]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices
and at least once every three years for
non-strategic stocks. The term strategic
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
stock means a marine mammal stock:
Administration
(A) For which the level of direct humancaused mortality exceeds the potential
RIN 0648–XC062
biological removal level; (B) which,
based on the best available scientific
Draft 2012 Marine Mammal Stock
information, is declining and is likely to
Assessment Reports
be listed as a threatened species under
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
the Endangered Species Act within the
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
foreseeable future; or (C) which is listed
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
as a threatened species or endangered
Commerce.
species under the Endangered Species
Act. NMFS and the FWS are required to
ACTION: Notification of availability;
revise a SAR if the status of the stock
response to comments.
has changed or can be more accurately
SUMMARY: NMFS reviewed the Alaska,
determined. NMFS, in conjunction with
Atlantic, and Pacific regional marine
the Alaska, Atlantic, and Pacific
mammal stock assessment reports
independent Scientific Review Groups
(SARs) in accordance with the Marine
(SRGs), reviewed the status of marine
Mammal Protection Act, and solicited
mammal stocks as required and revised
public comment on draft 2012 SARs.
reports in the Alaska, Atlantic, and
Subsequently, SARs for ten stocks of
Pacific regions to incorporate new
marine mammals in the Atlantic region
information. NMFS solicited public
have been updated with revised
comments on the draft 2012 SARs on
abundance estimates and some
August 7, 2012 (77 FR 47043); the 90corrections to bycatch estimates. These
day public comment period closed on
ten reports are final and available to the November 5, 2012.
public.
Subsequent to soliciting public
comment on the draft 2012 SARs, NMFS
ADDRESSES: The 2012 final SARs and
supporting documentation are available revised the 2011 abundance estimates
and the 2010 northeast sink gillnet
in electronic form via the Internet at
serious injury and mortality estimates
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/
for several Atlantic marine mammal
species.htm. Copies of the Atlantic
stocks after discovering errors based
SARs may be requested from Gordon
upon further review of the abundance
Waring, Northeast Fisheries Science
estimation methods and upon receiving
Center, 166 Water St., Woods Hole, MA
updated bycatch data. This new
02543.
information prompted the agency to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
correct and revise the SARs for the
Shannon Bettridge, Office of Protected
following marine mammal stocks
Resources, 301–427–8402,
Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov; or Gordon affected by these updates: fin whale,
western North Atlantic stock; sei whale,
Waring, 508–495–2311,
Nova Scotia stock; minke whale
Gordon.Waring@noaa.gov.
Canadian east coast stock; sperm whale,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
North Atlantic stock; Cuvier’s beaked
whale, western North Atlantic stock;
Background
Gervais’ beaked whale, western North
Section 117 of the Marine Mammal
Atlantic stock; Sowerby’s beaked whale,
Protection Act (MMPA) (16 U.S.C. 1361 western North Atlantic stock; Risso’s
et seq.) requires NMFS and the U.S. Fish dolphin, western North Atlantic stock;
and Wildlife Service (FWS) to prepare
Atlantic white-sided dolphin, western
stock assessments for each stock of
North Atlantic stock; and harbor
marine mammals occurring in waters
porpoise, Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy
under the jurisdiction of the United
stock. NMFS solicited public comment
States. These reports must contain
on the revised draft 2012 SARs for these
information regarding the distribution
ten stocks (78 FR 3399, January 16,
and abundance of the stock, population
2013). The public comment period on
growth rates and trends, estimates of
the revised reports closed on April 16,
annual human-caused mortality and
2013. This notice announces the
serious injury from all sources,
availability of the final 2012 reports for
descriptions of the fisheries with which the ten stocks identified above; the
the stock interacts, and the status of the
reports are available on NMFS’ Web site
stock. Initial reports were completed in
(see ADDRESSES).
1995.
Comments and Responses
The MMPA requires NMFS and FWS
to review the SARs at least annually for
NMFS received comments on the ten
strategic stocks and stocks for which
revised draft Atlantic SARs from the
significant new information is available, Marine Mammal Commission
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 May 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32377
(Commission), the Humane Society of
the United States and the Center for
Biological Diversity, two individuals,
and the National Park Service.
Comment 1: The Commission
recommends that NMFS expand the
report for the Gulf of Maine harbor
porpoise either to include a trend
analysis and explanation, or to describe
the reasons that the analysis and
explanation cannot be provided. If the
latter, then the Service also should
explain how it plans to rectify the
problem(s).
Response: The trend section of the
report was revised to include the
following text: ‘‘A trend analysis has not
been conducted for this stock. The
statistical power to detect a trend in
abundance for this stock is poor due to
the relatively imprecise abundance
estimates and long survey interval. For
example, the power to detect a
precipitous decline in abundance (i.e.,
50% decrease in 15 years) with
estimates of low precision (e.g., CV >
0.30) remains below 80% (alpha = 0.30)
unless surveys are conducted on an
annual basis (Taylor et al. 2007).’’
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends that NMFS contact
Canadian officials to (1) determine the
feasibility of an analysis of port catch
levels to estimate the number of harbor
porpoises caught in the Canadian Bay of
Fundy sink gillnet fishery since 2002,
and (2) pursue the development of a
reliable means for estimating harbor
porpoise bycatch in the Canadian Bay of
Fundy.
Response: As recommended by the
Commission, NMFS Northeast Fisheries
Science Center Protected Species
Branch is contacting Canadian
Department of Fisheries and Oceans
officials to obtain information on the
status of the fishery and harbor porpoise
bycatch.
Comment 3: The ‘‘Other Mortality’’
section of the white-sided dolphin SAR
cites Bogomolni as finding that 21
percent of strandings of this species
were disease-related. We did not have
access to this publication, but if the
nature of the diseases affecting these
animals was determined, it would be
useful to specify whether all of them
died as a result of the same or a variety
of pathogens. Since many pollutants
compromise immune systems of
animals, patterns in cause of death are
helpful to provide insight into
environmental health and/or threats to
the species.
Response: The focus of the Bogomolni
et al. (2010) publication was to
categorize stranding mortalities into
broad diagnoses such as disease,
human-interaction, mass-stranding, etc.
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
32378
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 104 / Thursday, May 30, 2013 / Notices
The authors mention that the most
frequently found disease processes were
bacterial pneumonia and sepsis/
bacteremia secondary to pyoderma, but,
other than mentioning a few specific
disease findings, do not detail or
analyze frequency of all the diseases
found in each species. The Bogomolni et
al. 2010 paper is open access and
available at https://www.int-res.com/
articles/dao_oa/d088p143.pdf. We have
rewritten the sentence slightly to read:
‘‘In an analysis of mortality causes of
stranded marine mammals on Cape Cod
and southeastern Massachusetts
between 2000 and 2006, Bogomolni et
al. (2010) found 69% (46 of 67) of
stranded white-sided dolphins were
involved in mass-stranding events with
no significant findings, and 21% (14 of
67) were classified as disease related.’’
Comment 4: The Humane Society of
the U.S. and the Center for Biological
Diversity commented that the Atlantic
Scientific Review Group (SRG) was not
consulted prior to NMFS using these
revised abundance and bycatch
estimates for management purposes.
The commenters believe the errors in
computation and the proposed changes
to the SARs should have been brought
to the attention of the SRG prior to being
used in management or presented to the
public as part of any take reduction
team process. In the future, if NMFS is
considering amending a SAR after a
draft was released for public comment,
it should first consult with the
appropriate SRG prior to using a revised
SAR for purposes of management of a
stock.
Response: The issues raised by the
Humane Society of the U.S. and the
Center for Biological Diversity were
addressed at the March 2013 Atlantic
SRG meeting. NMFS and the SRG
delineated a process that will ensure
SRG review of new or revised
abundance and mortality estimates and
methods prior to their release at other
forums (e.g., Take Reduction Teams).
Dated: May 23, 2012.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2013–12869 Filed 5–29–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 May 29, 2013
Jkt 229001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XC700
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
NMFS has prepared a draft
Environmental Assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of the potential effects of the
issuance of a direct take permit for a
hatchery program in Nason Creek, in the
upper Columbia River basin. The permit
application was provided by the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW) and the Public Utility
District No. 2 of Grant County (Grant
PUD). The proposed permit would be
issued for a period of 10 years. This
document serves to notify the public of
the draft environmental assessment for
public review, comment, and
submission of written data, views,
arguments, or other relevant information
before a final decision on whether to
issue a Finding of No Significant Impact
is made by NMFS. Also available for
public review and comment are two
addenda, one updating the Nason Creek
application and one describing a
proposed adult management program
associated with spring Chinook salmon
hatchery plans for major tributaries to
the Wenatchee River. All comments and
other information received will become
part of the public record and will be
available for review pursuant to section
10(c) of the ESA.
DATES: Comments and other
submissions must be received at the
appropriate address or fax number (see
ADDRESSES) no later than 5:00 p.m.
Pacific time on June 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Written responses to the
draft environmental assessment should
be sent to Allyson Purcell, National
Marine Fisheries Services, Salmon
Management Division, 1201 N.E. Lloyd
Boulevard, Suite 1100, Portland, OR
97232. Comments may also be
submitted by email to:
NasonCreekPlan.nwr@noaa.gov. Include
in the subject line of the email comment
the following identifier: Comments on
the Nason Creek Hatchery Assessment.
When commenting on the draft
environmental assessment, please refer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to the specific page number and line
number of the subject of your comment.
Comments may also be sent via
facsimile (fax) to (503) 872–2737.
Requests for copies of the draft
environmental assessment should be
directed to the National Marine
Fisheries Services, Salmon Management
Division, 1201 N.E. Lloyd Boulevard,
Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232. The
documents are also available on the
Internet at www.nwr.noaa.gov.
Comments received will also be
available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours by calling (503) 230–5418.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allyson Purcell at (503) 736–4736 or
email: allyson.purcell@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Species Covered in This Notice
Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha): endangered, naturally
produced and artificially propagated
Upper Columbia River spring-run.
Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss):
threatened, naturally produced and
artificially propagated Upper Columbia.
Background
Section 9 of the ESA and Federal
regulations prohibit the ‘‘taking’’ of a
species listed as endangered or
threatened. The term ‘‘take’’ is defined
under the ESA to mean harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to
engage in any such conduct. NMFS may
issue permits to take listed species for
any act otherwise prohibited by section
9 for scientific purposes or to enhance
the propagation or survival of the
affected species, under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA. NMFS
regulations governing permits for
threatened and endangered species are
promulgated at 50 CFR 222.307.
On September 15, 2009, Grant PUD
and the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife submitted an application
for an ESA permit to operate the Nason
Creek spring Chinook salmon artificial
propagation (hatchery) program. That
application was made available
previously for public review and
comment (75 FR 14133, March 24,
2010). The hatchery program would
collect adult spring Chinook salmon at
Tumwater Dam or a Nason Creek weir;
spawn, incubate, hatch, and rear the
resulting progeny at Eastbank Hatchery
and an acclimation facility to be
constructed on Nason Creek; release
juvenile Chinook salmon into Nason
Creek; and manage natural and hatchery
adult returns. Adult natural-origin fish
in excess of broodstock needs could be
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32377-32378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12869]
[[Page 32377]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XC062
Draft 2012 Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notification of availability; response to comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS reviewed the Alaska, Atlantic, and Pacific regional
marine mammal stock assessment reports (SARs) in accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act, and solicited public comment on draft
2012 SARs. Subsequently, SARs for ten stocks of marine mammals in the
Atlantic region have been updated with revised abundance estimates and
some corrections to bycatch estimates. These ten reports are final and
available to the public.
ADDRESSES: The 2012 final SARs and supporting documentation are
available in electronic form via the Internet at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/species.htm. Copies of the Atlantic SARs may
be requested from Gordon Waring, Northeast Fisheries Science Center,
166 Water St., Woods Hole, MA 02543.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shannon Bettridge, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8402, Shannon.Bettridge@noaa.gov; or Gordon Waring,
508-495-2311, Gordon.Waring@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 117 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) (16 U.S.C.
1361 et seq.) requires NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) to prepare stock assessments for each stock of marine mammals
occurring in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These
reports must contain information regarding the distribution and
abundance of the stock, population growth rates and trends, estimates
of annual human-caused mortality and serious injury from all sources,
descriptions of the fisheries with which the stock interacts, and the
status of the stock. Initial reports were completed in 1995.
The MMPA requires NMFS and FWS to review the SARs at least annually
for strategic stocks and stocks for which significant new information
is available, and at least once every three years for non-strategic
stocks. The term strategic stock means a marine mammal stock: (A) For
which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds the potential
biological removal level; (B) which, based on the best available
scientific information, is declining and is likely to be listed as a
threatened species under the Endangered Species Act within the
foreseeable future; or (C) which is listed as a threatened species or
endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. NMFS and the FWS
are required to revise a SAR if the status of the stock has changed or
can be more accurately determined. NMFS, in conjunction with the
Alaska, Atlantic, and Pacific independent Scientific Review Groups
(SRGs), reviewed the status of marine mammal stocks as required and
revised reports in the Alaska, Atlantic, and Pacific regions to
incorporate new information. NMFS solicited public comments on the
draft 2012 SARs on August 7, 2012 (77 FR 47043); the 90-day public
comment period closed on November 5, 2012.
Subsequent to soliciting public comment on the draft 2012 SARs,
NMFS revised the 2011 abundance estimates and the 2010 northeast sink
gillnet serious injury and mortality estimates for several Atlantic
marine mammal stocks after discovering errors based upon further review
of the abundance estimation methods and upon receiving updated bycatch
data. This new information prompted the agency to correct and revise
the SARs for the following marine mammal stocks affected by these
updates: fin whale, western North Atlantic stock; sei whale, Nova
Scotia stock; minke whale Canadian east coast stock; sperm whale, North
Atlantic stock; Cuvier's beaked whale, western North Atlantic stock;
Gervais' beaked whale, western North Atlantic stock; Sowerby's beaked
whale, western North Atlantic stock; Risso's dolphin, western North
Atlantic stock; Atlantic white-sided dolphin, western North Atlantic
stock; and harbor porpoise, Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy stock. NMFS
solicited public comment on the revised draft 2012 SARs for these ten
stocks (78 FR 3399, January 16, 2013). The public comment period on the
revised reports closed on April 16, 2013. This notice announces the
availability of the final 2012 reports for the ten stocks identified
above; the reports are available on NMFS' Web site (see ADDRESSES).
Comments and Responses
NMFS received comments on the ten revised draft Atlantic SARs from
the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission), the Humane Society of the
United States and the Center for Biological Diversity, two individuals,
and the National Park Service.
Comment 1: The Commission recommends that NMFS expand the report
for the Gulf of Maine harbor porpoise either to include a trend
analysis and explanation, or to describe the reasons that the analysis
and explanation cannot be provided. If the latter, then the Service
also should explain how it plans to rectify the problem(s).
Response: The trend section of the report was revised to include
the following text: ``A trend analysis has not been conducted for this
stock. The statistical power to detect a trend in abundance for this
stock is poor due to the relatively imprecise abundance estimates and
long survey interval. For example, the power to detect a precipitous
decline in abundance (i.e., 50% decrease in 15 years) with estimates of
low precision (e.g., CV > 0.30) remains below 80% (alpha = 0.30) unless
surveys are conducted on an annual basis (Taylor et al. 2007).''
Comment 2: The Commission recommends that NMFS contact Canadian
officials to (1) determine the feasibility of an analysis of port catch
levels to estimate the number of harbor porpoises caught in the
Canadian Bay of Fundy sink gillnet fishery since 2002, and (2) pursue
the development of a reliable means for estimating harbor porpoise
bycatch in the Canadian Bay of Fundy.
Response: As recommended by the Commission, NMFS Northeast
Fisheries Science Center Protected Species Branch is contacting
Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans officials to obtain
information on the status of the fishery and harbor porpoise bycatch.
Comment 3: The ``Other Mortality'' section of the white-sided
dolphin SAR cites Bogomolni as finding that 21 percent of strandings of
this species were disease-related. We did not have access to this
publication, but if the nature of the diseases affecting these animals
was determined, it would be useful to specify whether all of them died
as a result of the same or a variety of pathogens. Since many
pollutants compromise immune systems of animals, patterns in cause of
death are helpful to provide insight into environmental health and/or
threats to the species.
Response: The focus of the Bogomolni et al. (2010) publication was
to categorize stranding mortalities into broad diagnoses such as
disease, human-interaction, mass-stranding, etc.
[[Page 32378]]
The authors mention that the most frequently found disease processes
were bacterial pneumonia and sepsis/bacteremia secondary to pyoderma,
but, other than mentioning a few specific disease findings, do not
detail or analyze frequency of all the diseases found in each species.
The Bogomolni et al. 2010 paper is open access and available at https://www.int-res.com/articles/dao_oa/d088p143.pdf. We have rewritten the
sentence slightly to read: ``In an analysis of mortality causes of
stranded marine mammals on Cape Cod and southeastern Massachusetts
between 2000 and 2006, Bogomolni et al. (2010) found 69% (46 of 67) of
stranded white-sided dolphins were involved in mass-stranding events
with no significant findings, and 21% (14 of 67) were classified as
disease related.''
Comment 4: The Humane Society of the U.S. and the Center for
Biological Diversity commented that the Atlantic Scientific Review
Group (SRG) was not consulted prior to NMFS using these revised
abundance and bycatch estimates for management purposes. The commenters
believe the errors in computation and the proposed changes to the SARs
should have been brought to the attention of the SRG prior to being
used in management or presented to the public as part of any take
reduction team process. In the future, if NMFS is considering amending
a SAR after a draft was released for public comment, it should first
consult with the appropriate SRG prior to using a revised SAR for
purposes of management of a stock.
Response: The issues raised by the Humane Society of the U.S. and
the Center for Biological Diversity were addressed at the March 2013
Atlantic SRG meeting. NMFS and the SRG delineated a process that will
ensure SRG review of new or revised abundance and mortality estimates
and methods prior to their release at other forums (e.g., Take
Reduction Teams).
Dated: May 23, 2012.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-12869 Filed 5-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P