Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revision, 32161-32165 [2013-12712]
Download as PDF
32161
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
the Agency. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because
this final rule has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866,
this final rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 20, 2013
Lois A. Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.910, alphabetically add the
following inert ingredient to the table to
read as follows:
■
§ 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and
post-harvest; exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance.
*
*
*
*
*
Inert ingredients
Limits
*
*
*
*
*
Methyl 5-(dimethylamino)-2-methyl-5-oxopentanoate (1174627–68–9) ............................................................
*
...........................
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–12457 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R06–RCRA–2012–0821; 9817–6]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate direct rule.
AGENCY:
Oklahoma has applied to the
EPA for Final authorization of the
changes to its hazardous waste program
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
*
*
under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has
determined that these changes satisfy all
requirements needed to qualify for Final
authorization, and is authorizing the
State’s changes through this immediate
final action. The EPA is publishing this
rule to authorize the changes without a
prior proposal because we believe this
action is not controversial and do not
expect comments that oppose it. Unless
we receive written comments which
oppose this authorization during the
comment period, the decision to
authorize Oklahoma’s changes to its
hazardous waste program will take
effect. If we receive comments that
oppose this action, we will publish a
document in the Federal Register
withdrawing this rule before it takes
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Uses
*
Solvent
*
effect, and a separate document in the
proposed rules section of this Federal
Register will serve as a proposal to
authorize the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will
become effective on July 29, 2013 unless
the EPA receives adverse written
comment by June 28, 2013. If the EPA
receives such comment, it will publish
a timely withdrawal of this immediate
final rule in the Federal Register and
inform the public that this authorization
will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by
one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
32162
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Region 6,
Regional Authorization Coordinator,
State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD–O),
Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202–2733.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to Alima Patterson,
Region 6, Regional Authorization
Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight
Section (6PD–O), Multimedia Planning
and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202–
2733.
Instructions: Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov, or email. The Federal
regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If the EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
the EPA may not be able to consider
your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any
form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses.
You can view and copy Oklahoma’s
application and associated publicly
available materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m. Monday through Friday at the
following locations: Oklahoma
Department of Environmental Quality,
707 North Robinson, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma 73101–1677, (405) 702–7180
and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, phone
number (214) 665–8533. Interested
persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an
appointment with the office at least two
weeks in advance.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal
Oversight Section (6PD–O), Multimedia
Planning and Permitting Division, (214)
665–8533, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202–2733, and
Email address patterson.alima@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
A. Why are revisions to state programs
necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
the changes. Changes to State programs
may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to the EPA’s regulations in 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts
124, 260 through 266, 268, 270, 273, and
279.
B. What decisions have we made in this
rule?
We conclude that Oklahoma’s
application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and
regulatory requirements established by
RCRA. Therefore, we grant Oklahoma
Final authorization to operate its
hazardous waste program with the
changes described in the authorization
application. Oklahoma has
responsibility for permitting treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities within its
borders. Also section 10211(a) of the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act of 2005
(‘‘SAFETEA’’), Public Law 109–59, 119
Statute 1144 (August 10, 2005) provides
the State of Oklahoma opportunity to
request approval from EPA to
administer RCRA subtitle C in Indian
Country and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its
revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates
under the authority of HSWA take effect
in authorized States before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus,
the EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in
Oklahoma including issuing permits,
until the State is granted authorization
to do so.
C. What is the effect of today’s
authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that a
facility in Oklahoma subject to RCRA
will now have to comply with the
authorized State requirements instead of
the equivalent Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Oklahoma
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
has enforcement responsibilities under
its State hazardous waste program for
violations of such program, but the EPA
retains its authority under RCRA
sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority
to:
• Do inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements and
suspend or revoke permits and
• take enforcement actions after
notice to and consultation with the
State.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which Oklahoma is being
authorized by today’s action is already
effective under State law, and are not
changed by today’s action.
D. Why wasn’t there a proposed rule
before today’s rule?
The EPA did not publish a proposal
before today’s rule because we view this
as a routine program change and do not
expect comments that oppose this
approval. We are providing an
opportunity for public comment now. In
addition to this rule, in the proposed
rules section of today’s Federal Register
we are publishing a separate document
that proposes to authorize the State
program changes.
E. What happens if the EPA receives
comments that oppose this action?
If the EPA receives comments that
oppose this authorization, we will
withdraw this rule by publishing a
document in the Federal Register before
the rule becomes effective. The EPA will
base any further decision on the
authorization of the State program
changes on the proposal mentioned in
the previous paragraph. We will then
address all public comments in a later
final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to
comment on this authorization, you
must do so at this time. If we receive
comments that oppose only the
authorization of a particular change to
the State hazardous waste program, we
will withdraw only that part of this rule,
but the authorization of the program
changes that the comments do not
oppose will become effective on the
date specified in this document. The
Federal Register withdrawal document
will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective, and
which part is being withdrawn.
F. For what has Oklahoma previously
been authorized?
Oklahoma initially received final
Authorization on January 10, 1985, (49
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
FR 50362–50363) published December
27, 1984 to implement its base
hazardous waste management program.
We authorized the following revisions:
Oklahoma received authorization for
revisions to its program with
publication dates: April 17, 1990 (55 FR
14280–14282), effective June 18, 1990;
September 26, 1990 (55 FR 39274)
effective November 27, 1990; April 2,
1991 (56 FR 13411–13413) effective
June 3, 1991; September 20, 1991 (56 FR
47675–47677) effective November 19,
1991; September 29, 1993 (58 FR
50854–50856) effective November 29,
1993; October 12, 1993 (58 FR 52679–
52682) effective December 13, 1993;
October 7, 1994 (59 FR 51116–51122)
effective December 21, 1994; January 11,
1995 (60 FR 2699–2702) effective April
27, 1995; October 9, 1996 (61 FR 52884–
52886) effective December 23, 1996;
Technical Correction March 14, 1997
(62 FR 12100–12101) effective March
14, 1997; September 22, 1998 (63 FR
50528–50531) effective November 23,
1998; March 29, 2000 (65 FR 16528–
16532) effective May 30, 2000; May 10,
2000 (65 FR 29981–29985) effective
June 10, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR
28–33) effective March 5, 2001; April 9,
2003 (68 FR 17308–17311) effective
June 9, 2003 and February 4, 2009 (74
FR 5994–6001); (66 FR 18927–18930)
effective June 6, 2011 and March 15,
2012 (77 FR 15273–15276) effective May
14, 2012. The authorized Oklahoma
RCRA program was incorporated by
reference into the CFR published on
December 9, 1998 (63 FR 67800–67834)
effective February 8, 1999, August 26,
1999 (64 FR 46567–46571) effective
October 25, 1999, August 27, 2003 (68
FR 51488–51492) effective October 27,
2003, August 27, 2010 (75 FR 36546)
June 28, 2010 and May 17, 2012 (77 FR
29231–29235) effective July 16, 2012.
On August 24, 2012, Oklahoma
submitted a final complete program
revision application seeking
authorization of its program revision in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21.
The Oklahoma Hazardous Waste
Management Act (‘‘OHWMA’’) provides
the ODEQ with the authority to
administer the State Program, including
the statutory and regulatory provisions
necessary to administer the provisions
of RCRA Cluster XXI, and designates the
ODEQ as the State agency to cooperate
and share information with EPA for
purpose of hazardous waste regulation.
The Oklahoma Environmental Quality
Code (‘‘Code’’), at 27 A O.S. Section 2–
7–101 et seq. establishes the statutory
authority to administer the Hazardous
waste management program und subtitle
C. The State regulations to manage the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
Hazardous waste management program
is at Oklahoma Administrative Code
(OAC) Title 252 Chapter 205.
The DEQ adopted applicable Federal
hazardous waste regulations as
amended through July 1, 2011 which
became effective July 1, 2012. The
provisions for which the State of
Oklahoma is seeking authorization are
documented in the Regulatory
Documentation For Federal Provisions
For Which The State Of Oklahoma Is
Seeking Authorization, Federal Final
Rules Published Between July 1, 2010
Through June 30, 2011 RCRA Cluster
XXI prepared on June 14, 2012.
The DEQ incorporates the Federal
regulations by reference and there have
been no changes in State or Federal laws
or regulations that have diminished the
DEQ’s ability to adopt the Federal
regulations by reference as set forth in
the authorizations at 77 FR 1236–1262,
75 FR 15273 through 15276 for RCRA
Cluster XXI. The Federal Hazardous
waste regulations are adopted by
reference by the DEQ at OAC 252:205,
Subchapter 3. The DEQ does not adopt
Federal regulations prospectively.
The State Hazardous waste
management program (‘‘State Program’’)
now has in place the statutory authority
and regulations for all required
components of Checklists 225, 226 and
227 in Cluster XXI. These statutory and
regulatory provisions were developed to
ensure the State program is equivalent
to, consistent with and no less stringent
than the Federal Hazardous waste
management program.
The Environmental Quality Act, at
27A O.S. Section 1–3–101(E), grants the
Oklahoma Corporation Commission
(‘‘OCC’’) authority to regulate certain
aspects of the oil and gas production
and transportation industry in
Oklahoma, including certain wastes
generated by pipelines, bulk fuel sales
terminals and certain tank farms, as well
as underground storage tanks. To clarify
areas of environmental jurisdiction, the
ODEQ and OCC developed an ODEQ/
OCC Jurisdictional Guidance Document
to identify respective areas of
jurisdiction. The current ODEQ/OCC
jurisdictional Guidance Document was
amended and signed on January 27,
1999. The revisions to the State Program
necessary to administer Cluster XXI will
not affect the jurisdictional authorities
of the ODEQ or OCC.
The ODEQ adopted RCRA Cluster XXI
applicable federal hazardous waste
regulations as amended through July 1,
2011 and became effective on July 1,
2012. The rules were also codified at
OAC 252:205 et seq., Subchapter 3.
Pursuant to OAC 252:205–3–1, the
State’s incorporation of Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32163
regulations does not incorporate
prospectively future changes to the
incorporated sections of the 40 CFR, and
no other Oklahoma law or regulation
reduces the scope of coverage or
otherwise affects the authority provided
by these incorporated-by-reference
provisions. Further, Oklahoma
interprets these incorporated provisions
to provide identical authority to the
Federal provisions. Thus, OAC Title
252, Chapter 205 provides equivalent
and no less stringent authority than the
Federal Subtitle C program in effect July
1, 2011. The State of Oklahoma
incorporates by reference the provisions
of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
parts 124 of 40 CFR that are required by
40 CFR 271.14 (with the addition of 40
CFR 124.19(a) through (c), 124.19(e),
124.31, 124.32, 124.33 and Subpart G);
40 CFR Parts 260–268 [with the
exception of 260.21, 262 Subparts E and
H, 264.1(f), 264.1(g)(12), 264.149,
264.150, 264.301(1), 264.1030(d),
264.1050(g), 264.1080(e), 264.1080(f),
264.1080(g), 265.1(c)(4), 265.1(g)12),
265.149, 265.150, 265.1030(c),
265.1050(f) 265.1080(e), 265.1080(f),
265.1080(g), 268.5, 268.6, 268.13,
268.42(b), and 268.44(a) through (g)]; 40
CFR Part 270 [with the exception of
270.1(c)(2)(ix and 270.14(b)(18)]; 40 CFR
Part 273; and 40 CFR Part 279.
The DEQ is the lead Department to
cooperate and share information with
the EPA for purpose of hazardous waste
regulation.
Pursuant to 27A O.S. Section 2–7–
104, the Executive Director has created
the Land Protection Division (LPD) to be
responsible for implementing the State
Program. The LPD is staffed with
personnel that have the technical
background and expertise to effectively
implement the provisions of the State
program subtitle C Hazardous waste
management program.
G. What changes are we approving with
today’s action?
On August 24, 2012, the State of
Oklahoma submitted final complete
program applications, seeking
authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We
now make an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of written comments
that oppose this action that the State of
Oklahoma’s hazardous waste program
revision satisfies all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final
authorization.
The State of Oklahoma revisions
consist of regulations which specifically
govern Federal Hazardous waste
revisions promulgated between July 1,
2010 through June 30, 2011 (RCRA
Cluster XXI). Oklahoma requirements
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
32164
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
are included in a chart with this
document.
Description of federal requirement (include
checklist No. if relevant)
FEDERAL REGISTER date and page
(and/or RCRA statutory authority
Analogous state authority
1. Removal of Saccharin and its Salts from the
Lists of Hazardous Wastes. (Checklist 225).
75 FR 78918–78926 January 18, 2011 ...........
2. Corrections to the Academic Laboratories
Generator Standards (Checklist 226).
75 FR 79304–79308 December 20, 2010 .......
3. Revisions of the Treatment Standards for
Carbamate Wastes. (Checklist 227).
76 FR 34147–34157 August 12, 2011 .............
Oklahoma Statutes Title 27A Section 2–7–101
et seq., Oklahoma Hazardous Waste Management Act, as amended effective July 1,
2011; Oklahoma Administrative Code, Title
252, Chapter 205, as amended effective
July 1, 2012.
Oklahoma Statutes Title 27A Section 2–7–101
et seq., Oklahoma Hazardous Waste Management Act, as amended effective July 1,
2011; Oklahoma Administrative Code, Title
252, Chapter 205, as amended effective
July 1, 2012.
Oklahoma Statutes Title 27A Section 2–7–101
et seq., Oklahoma Hazardous Waste Management Act, as amended effective July 1,
2011; Oklahoma Administrative Code, Title
252, Chapter 205, as amended effective
July 1, 2012.
H. Where are the revised State rules
different from the Federal rules?
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA).
There are no State requirements that
are more stringent or broader in scope
than the Federal requirements.
K. What is codification and is the EPA
codifying Oklahoma’s hazardous waste
program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the CFR.
We do this by referencing the
authorized State rules in 40 CFR part
272. We reserve the amendment of 40
CFR part 272, subpart LL for this
authorization of Oklahoma’s program
changes until a later date. In this
authorization application the EPA is not
codifying the rules documented in this
Federal Register notice.
I. Who handles permits after the
authorization takes effect?
Oklahoma will issue permits for all
the provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. The EPA will continue to
administer any RCRA hazardous waste
permits or portions of permits which we
issued prior to the effective date of this
authorization. We will not issue any
more new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in the
Table in this document after the
effective date of this authorization. The
EPA will continue to implement and
issue permits for HSWA requirements
for which Oklahoma is not yet
authorized.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
J. How does today’s action affect Indian
Country (8 U.S.C. 1151) in Oklahoma?
Section 8 U.S.C. 1151 does not affect
the State of Oklahoma because under
section 10211(a) of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act of 2005
(‘‘SAFETEA’’), Public Law 109–59, 119
Statute 1144 (August 10, 2005) provides
the State of Oklahoma opportunity to
request approval from EPA to
administer RCRA subtitle C in Indian
Country and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its
revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
and therefore this action is not subject
to review by OMB. The reference to
Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011) is also exempt from
review under Executive orders 12866
(56 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). This
action authorizes State requirements for
the purpose of RCRA 3006 and imposes
no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
action authorizes preexisting
requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
duty beyond that required by State law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For the same
reason, this action also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely authorizes State requirements as
part of the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants
a State’s application for authorization as
long as the State meets the criteria
required by RCRA. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for the
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. The
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the Executive
Order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a
report containing this document and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective July 29, 2013.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
[FR Doc. 2013–12712 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 0
[WT Docket No. 10–177; FCC 13–4]
Commercial Radio Operators;
Correction
Federal Communication
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) is correcting a final
rule that appeared in the Federal
Register of April 18, 2013. The
document amended the FCC rules
concerning radio operator licenses for
maritime and aviation in order to reduce
administrative burden in the public’s
interest.
Commission’s program for registration,
construction, marking and lighting of
antenna structures (part 17 of this
chapter), and the Commission’s
privatized ship radio inspection
program (part 80 of this chapter).
*
*
*
*
*
(s)(1) Extends the Communications
Act Safety Radiotelephony Certificate
for a period of up to 90 days beyond the
specified expiration date.
(2) Grants emergency exemption
requests, extensions or waivers of
inspection to ships in accordance with
applicable provisions of the
Communications Act, the Safety
Convention, the Great Lakes Agreement
or the Commission’s rules.
[FR Doc. 2013–12723 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective May 29, 2013,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stana Kimball, Mobility Division,
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
202–418–1306, TTY 202–418–7233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
2013–02372 appearing on page 23151 in
the Federal Register of Thursday, April
18, 2013 (78 FR 23150), the following
corrections are made.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 0
Organization and functions
(Government agencies).
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
Accordingly, 47 CFR part 0 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 0—COMMISSION
ORGANIZATION
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Dated: May 2, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
32165
1. The authority citation for part 0
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 5,48 Stat. 1068, as
amended; 47 U.S.C. 155.
2. Section 0.131 is amended by
revising paragraph (j) and adding
paragraph (s) to read as follows:
■
§ 0.131
Functions of the Bureau.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Administers the Commission’s
commercial radio operator program
(part 13 of this chapter); the
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 15
[ET Docket No. 04–37 and 03–104; FCC 13–
53]
Broadband Over Power Lines
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document addressed a
petition for reconsideration filed by the
national association for Amateur Radio,
formally known as the American Radio
Relay League (ARRL). ARRL seeks
reconsideration of the Commission’s
Second Report and Order in this
proceeding relating to Access
Broadband over Power Line (Access
BPL) systems. The Commission
concludes that its previous decisions in
this proceeding strike an appropriate
balance between the dual objectives of
providing for Access BPL technology—
which has potential applications for
broadband and Smart Grid uses—while
protecting incumbent radio services
against harmful interference.
DATES: Effective June 28, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anh
Wride, Office of Engineering and
Technology, 202–418–0577,
Anh.Wride@fcc.gov.
SUMMARY:
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Second
Memorandum Opinion and Order, ET
Docket No. 04–37 and 03–104, FCC 13–
53, adopted April 16, 2013 and released
April 17, 2013. The full text of this
document is available for inspection
and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Center
(Room CY–A257), 445 12th Street SW.,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32161-32165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12712]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R06-RCRA-2012-0821; 9817-6]
Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Immediate direct rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Oklahoma has applied to the EPA for Final authorization of the
changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that these changes satisfy
all requirements needed to qualify for Final authorization, and is
authorizing the State's changes through this immediate final action.
The EPA is publishing this rule to authorize the changes without a
prior proposal because we believe this action is not controversial and
do not expect comments that oppose it. Unless we receive written
comments which oppose this authorization during the comment period, the
decision to authorize Oklahoma's changes to its hazardous waste program
will take effect. If we receive comments that oppose this action, we
will publish a document in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule
before it takes effect, and a separate document in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register will serve as a proposal to authorize
the changes.
DATES: This final authorization will become effective on July 29, 2013
unless the EPA receives adverse written comment by June 28, 2013. If
the EPA receives such comment, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
this immediate final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that this authorization will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: patterson.alima@epa.gov.
[[Page 32162]]
3. Mail: Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional Authorization
Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD-O), Multimedia
Planning and Permitting Division, EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Dallas Texas 75202-2733.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Alima
Patterson, Region 6, Regional Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal
Oversight Section (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division,
EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through regulations.gov, or email. The Federal
regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
the EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to the EPA without going through regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
You can view and copy Oklahoma's application and associated
publicly available materials from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. Monday through
Friday at the following locations: Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality, 707 North Robinson, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101-1677, (405)
702-7180 and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733,
phone number (214) 665-8533. Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an appointment with the office at least two
weeks in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator, State/Tribal Oversight Section (6PD-O),
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, (214) 665-8533, EPA Region
6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas Texas 75202-2733, and Email address
patterson.alima@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from the EPA under
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes,
States must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or
State statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur. Most commonly, States must change their programs
because of changes to the EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 266, 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have we made in this rule?
We conclude that Oklahoma's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we grant Oklahoma Final authorization
to operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in
the authorization application. Oklahoma has responsibility for
permitting treatment, storage, and disposal facilities within its
borders. Also section 10211(a) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005 (``SAFETEA''), Public Law
109-59, 119 Statute 1144 (August 10, 2005) provides the State of
Oklahoma opportunity to request approval from EPA to administer RCRA
subtitle C in Indian Country and for carrying out the aspects of the
RCRA program described in its revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates under the authority of HSWA take
effect in authorized States before they are authorized for the
requirements. Thus, the EPA will implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Oklahoma including issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
C. What is the effect of today's authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that a facility in Oklahoma subject
to RCRA will now have to comply with the authorized State requirements
instead of the equivalent Federal requirements in order to comply with
RCRA. Oklahoma has enforcement responsibilities under its State
hazardous waste program for violations of such program, but the EPA
retains its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
which include, among others, authority to:
Do inspections, and require monitoring, tests, analyses,
or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits
and
take enforcement actions after notice to and consultation
with the State.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Oklahoma is being
authorized by today's action is already effective under State law, and
are not changed by today's action.
D. Why wasn't there a proposed rule before today's rule?
The EPA did not publish a proposal before today's rule because we
view this as a routine program change and do not expect comments that
oppose this approval. We are providing an opportunity for public
comment now. In addition to this rule, in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register we are publishing a separate document that
proposes to authorize the State program changes.
E. What happens if the EPA receives comments that oppose this action?
If the EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we
will withdraw this rule by publishing a document in the Federal
Register before the rule becomes effective. The EPA will base any
further decision on the authorization of the State program changes on
the proposal mentioned in the previous paragraph. We will then address
all public comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this authorization,
you must do so at this time. If we receive comments that oppose only
the authorization of a particular change to the State hazardous waste
program, we will withdraw only that part of this rule, but the
authorization of the program changes that the comments do not oppose
will become effective on the date specified in this document. The
Federal Register withdrawal document will specify which part of the
authorization will become effective, and which part is being withdrawn.
F. For what has Oklahoma previously been authorized?
Oklahoma initially received final Authorization on January 10,
1985, (49
[[Page 32163]]
FR 50362-50363) published December 27, 1984 to implement its base
hazardous waste management program. We authorized the following
revisions: Oklahoma received authorization for revisions to its program
with publication dates: April 17, 1990 (55 FR 14280-14282), effective
June 18, 1990; September 26, 1990 (55 FR 39274) effective November 27,
1990; April 2, 1991 (56 FR 13411-13413) effective June 3, 1991;
September 20, 1991 (56 FR 47675-47677) effective November 19, 1991;
September 29, 1993 (58 FR 50854-50856) effective November 29, 1993;
October 12, 1993 (58 FR 52679-52682) effective December 13, 1993;
October 7, 1994 (59 FR 51116-51122) effective December 21, 1994;
January 11, 1995 (60 FR 2699-2702) effective April 27, 1995; October 9,
1996 (61 FR 52884-52886) effective December 23, 1996; Technical
Correction March 14, 1997 (62 FR 12100-12101) effective March 14, 1997;
September 22, 1998 (63 FR 50528-50531) effective November 23, 1998;
March 29, 2000 (65 FR 16528-16532) effective May 30, 2000; May 10, 2000
(65 FR 29981-29985) effective June 10, 2000; January 2, 2001 (66 FR 28-
33) effective March 5, 2001; April 9, 2003 (68 FR 17308-17311)
effective June 9, 2003 and February 4, 2009 (74 FR 5994-6001); (66 FR
18927-18930) effective June 6, 2011 and March 15, 2012 (77 FR 15273-
15276) effective May 14, 2012. The authorized Oklahoma RCRA program was
incorporated by reference into the CFR published on December 9, 1998
(63 FR 67800-67834) effective February 8, 1999, August 26, 1999 (64 FR
46567-46571) effective October 25, 1999, August 27, 2003 (68 FR 51488-
51492) effective October 27, 2003, August 27, 2010 (75 FR 36546) June
28, 2010 and May 17, 2012 (77 FR 29231-29235) effective July 16, 2012.
On August 24, 2012, Oklahoma submitted a final complete program
revision application seeking authorization of its program revision in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21.
The Oklahoma Hazardous Waste Management Act (``OHWMA'') provides
the ODEQ with the authority to administer the State Program, including
the statutory and regulatory provisions necessary to administer the
provisions of RCRA Cluster XXI, and designates the ODEQ as the State
agency to cooperate and share information with EPA for purpose of
hazardous waste regulation. The Oklahoma Environmental Quality Code
(``Code''), at 27 A O.S. Section 2-7-101 et seq. establishes the
statutory authority to administer the Hazardous waste management
program und subtitle C. The State regulations to manage the Hazardous
waste management program is at Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) Title
252 Chapter 205.
The DEQ adopted applicable Federal hazardous waste regulations as
amended through July 1, 2011 which became effective July 1, 2012. The
provisions for which the State of Oklahoma is seeking authorization are
documented in the Regulatory Documentation For Federal Provisions For
Which The State Of Oklahoma Is Seeking Authorization, Federal Final
Rules Published Between July 1, 2010 Through June 30, 2011 RCRA Cluster
XXI prepared on June 14, 2012.
The DEQ incorporates the Federal regulations by reference and there
have been no changes in State or Federal laws or regulations that have
diminished the DEQ's ability to adopt the Federal regulations by
reference as set forth in the authorizations at 77 FR 1236-1262, 75 FR
15273 through 15276 for RCRA Cluster XXI. The Federal Hazardous waste
regulations are adopted by reference by the DEQ at OAC 252:205,
Subchapter 3. The DEQ does not adopt Federal regulations prospectively.
The State Hazardous waste management program (``State Program'')
now has in place the statutory authority and regulations for all
required components of Checklists 225, 226 and 227 in Cluster XXI.
These statutory and regulatory provisions were developed to ensure the
State program is equivalent to, consistent with and no less stringent
than the Federal Hazardous waste management program.
The Environmental Quality Act, at 27A O.S. Section 1-3-101(E),
grants the Oklahoma Corporation Commission (``OCC'') authority to
regulate certain aspects of the oil and gas production and
transportation industry in Oklahoma, including certain wastes generated
by pipelines, bulk fuel sales terminals and certain tank farms, as well
as underground storage tanks. To clarify areas of environmental
jurisdiction, the ODEQ and OCC developed an ODEQ/OCC Jurisdictional
Guidance Document to identify respective areas of jurisdiction. The
current ODEQ/OCC jurisdictional Guidance Document was amended and
signed on January 27, 1999. The revisions to the State Program
necessary to administer Cluster XXI will not affect the jurisdictional
authorities of the ODEQ or OCC.
The ODEQ adopted RCRA Cluster XXI applicable federal hazardous
waste regulations as amended through July 1, 2011 and became effective
on July 1, 2012. The rules were also codified at OAC 252:205 et seq.,
Subchapter 3.
Pursuant to OAC 252:205-3-1, the State's incorporation of Federal
regulations does not incorporate prospectively future changes to the
incorporated sections of the 40 CFR, and no other Oklahoma law or
regulation reduces the scope of coverage or otherwise affects the
authority provided by these incorporated-by-reference provisions.
Further, Oklahoma interprets these incorporated provisions to provide
identical authority to the Federal provisions. Thus, OAC Title 252,
Chapter 205 provides equivalent and no less stringent authority than
the Federal Subtitle C program in effect July 1, 2011. The State of
Oklahoma incorporates by reference the provisions of 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124 of 40 CFR that are required by 40 CFR
271.14 (with the addition of 40 CFR 124.19(a) through (c), 124.19(e),
124.31, 124.32, 124.33 and Subpart G); 40 CFR Parts 260-268 [with the
exception of 260.21, 262 Subparts E and H, 264.1(f), 264.1(g)(12),
264.149, 264.150, 264.301(1), 264.1030(d), 264.1050(g), 264.1080(e),
264.1080(f), 264.1080(g), 265.1(c)(4), 265.1(g)12), 265.149, 265.150,
265.1030(c), 265.1050(f) 265.1080(e), 265.1080(f), 265.1080(g), 268.5,
268.6, 268.13, 268.42(b), and 268.44(a) through (g)]; 40 CFR Part 270
[with the exception of 270.1(c)(2)(ix and 270.14(b)(18)]; 40 CFR Part
273; and 40 CFR Part 279.
The DEQ is the lead Department to cooperate and share information
with the EPA for purpose of hazardous waste regulation.
Pursuant to 27A O.S. Section 2-7-104, the Executive Director has
created the Land Protection Division (LPD) to be responsible for
implementing the State Program. The LPD is staffed with personnel that
have the technical background and expertise to effectively implement
the provisions of the State program subtitle C Hazardous waste
management program.
G. What changes are we approving with today's action?
On August 24, 2012, the State of Oklahoma submitted final complete
program applications, seeking authorization of their changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. We now make an immediate final decision,
subject to receipt of written comments that oppose this action that the
State of Oklahoma's hazardous waste program revision satisfies all of
the requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization.
The State of Oklahoma revisions consist of regulations which
specifically govern Federal Hazardous waste revisions promulgated
between July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 (RCRA Cluster XXI). Oklahoma
requirements
[[Page 32164]]
are included in a chart with this document.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register
Description of federal date and page
requirement (include checklist (and/or RCRA Analogous state
No. if relevant) statutory authority
authority
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Removal of Saccharin and its 75 FR 78918-78926 Oklahoma Statutes
Salts from the Lists of January 18, 2011. Title 27A Section
Hazardous Wastes. (Checklist 2-7-101 et seq.,
225). Oklahoma
Hazardous Waste
Management Act,
as amended
effective July 1,
2011; Oklahoma
Administrative
Code, Title 252,
Chapter 205, as
amended effective
July 1, 2012.
2. Corrections to the Academic 75 FR 79304-79308 Oklahoma Statutes
Laboratories Generator December 20, 2010. Title 27A Section
Standards (Checklist 226). 2-7-101 et seq.,
Oklahoma
Hazardous Waste
Management Act,
as amended
effective July 1,
2011; Oklahoma
Administrative
Code, Title 252,
Chapter 205, as
amended effective
July 1, 2012.
3. Revisions of the Treatment 76 FR 34147-34157 Oklahoma Statutes
Standards for Carbamate Wastes. August 12, 2011. Title 27A Section
(Checklist 227). 2-7-101 et seq.,
Oklahoma
Hazardous Waste
Management Act,
as amended
effective July 1,
2011; Oklahoma
Administrative
Code, Title 252,
Chapter 205, as
amended effective
July 1, 2012.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
H. Where are the revised State rules different from the Federal rules?
There are no State requirements that are more stringent or broader
in scope than the Federal requirements.
I. Who handles permits after the authorization takes effect?
Oklahoma will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. The EPA will
continue to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of
permits which we issued prior to the effective date of this
authorization. We will not issue any more new permits or new portions
of permits for the provisions listed in the Table in this document
after the effective date of this authorization. The EPA will continue
to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which Oklahoma
is not yet authorized.
J. How does today's action affect Indian Country (8 U.S.C. 1151) in
Oklahoma?
Section 8 U.S.C. 1151 does not affect the State of Oklahoma because
under section 10211(a) of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act of 2005 (``SAFETEA''), Public Law 109-59, 119
Statute 1144 (August 10, 2005) provides the State of Oklahoma
opportunity to request approval from EPA to administer RCRA subtitle C
in Indian Country and for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA program
described in its revised program application, subject to the
limitations of the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA).
K. What is codification and is the EPA codifying Oklahoma's hazardous
waste program as authorized in this rule?
Codification is the process of placing the State's statutes and
regulations that comprise the State's authorized hazardous waste
program into the CFR. We do this by referencing the authorized State
rules in 40 CFR part 272. We reserve the amendment of 40 CFR part 272,
subpart LL for this authorization of Oklahoma's program changes until a
later date. In this authorization application the EPA is not codifying
the rules documented in this Federal Register notice.
L. Administrative Requirements
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993), and therefore this action is not subject to review by OMB. The
reference to Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011) is
also exempt from review under Executive orders 12866 (56 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). This action authorizes State requirements for the
purpose of RCRA 3006 and imposes no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. Accordingly, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.). Because this action authorizes preexisting requirements under
State law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). For the same
reason, this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely authorizes State requirements as part of the State
RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant and it does not
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA 3006(b), the EPA grants a State's application for
authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the
[[Page 32165]]
EPA, when it reviews a State authorization application to require the
use of any particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has
complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the Executive
Order. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing
this document and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the
U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication in the Federal Register. A major
rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2). This action will be effective July 29, 2013.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: May 2, 2013.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2013-12712 Filed 5-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P