Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority, 32251-32252 [2013-12695]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Notices
required to submit for EPA approval a
security plan under which any CBI will
be secured and protected against
unauthorized release or compromise. No
information will be provided to CDM
Smith and its subcontractor, Dynamac
Corp, until the requirements in this
B. How can I get copies of this document
document have been fully satisfied.
and other related information?
Records of information provided to
EPA has established a docket for this
CDM Smith and its subcontractor,
action under docket identification (ID)
Dynamac Corp, will be maintained by
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0036.
EPA Project Officers for this contract.
Publicly available docket materials are
All information supplied to CDM Smith
available either in the electronic docket
and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, by
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only EPA for use in connection with this
available in hard copy, at the Office of
contract will be returned to EPA when
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
CDM Smith and its subcontractor,
Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One
Dynamac Corp, have completed their
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
work.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
List of Subjects
operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
Environmental protection, Business
through Friday, excluding legal
and industry, Government contracts,
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone Government property, Pesticides and
number is (703) 305–5805.
pests, Security measures.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
entities that may be affected by this
action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
II. Contractor Requirements
Under Contract No. EP–W–11–020,
CDM Smith and its subcontractor,
Dynamac Corp, will perform support
OPP in four general areas: Reviewing
and evaluating studies provided by the
registrants or found in open literature
searches; producing assessments;
reviewing submitted risk assessments;
and developing or improving risk
assessment methods. In addition,
support may be required to provide
training for EPA staff on issues related
to the science and methods of risk
assessment. Workshop organization and
facilitation may also be required.
OPP has determined that access by
CDM Smith and its subcontractor,
Dynamac Corp, to information on all
pesticide chemicals is necessary for the
performance of this contract.
Some of this information may be
entitled to confidential treatment. The
information has been submitted to EPA
under sections 3, 4, 6, and 7 of FIFRA
and under sections 408 and 409 of
FFDCA.
In accordance with the requirements
of 40 CFR 2.307(h)(2), the contract with
CDM Smith and its subcontractor,
Dynamac Corp, prohibits use of the
information for any purpose not
specified in the contract; prohibits
disclosure of the information to a third
party without prior written approval
from the Agency; and requires that each
official and employee of the contractor
sign an agreement to protect the
information from unauthorized release
and to handle it in accordance with the
FIFRA Information Security Manual. In
addition, CDM Smith and its
subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
Dated: May 14, 2013.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Information Technology and
Resources Management Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013–12780 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission Under Delegated
Authority
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are
requested concerning whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Commission’s burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected;
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32251
other forms of information technology;
and ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before July 29, 2013.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
the Federal Communications
Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov
and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0788.
Title: DTV Showings/Interference
Agreements.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 300 respondents; 300
responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 5
hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
reporting requirement, Third Party
Disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 1,500 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $3,900,000.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
authority for this collection is contained
in Sections 154(i), 303 and 308 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
There is no need for confidentiality
required with this collection of
information.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.623
requires applicants to submit a technical
showing to establish that their proposed
facilities will not result in additional
interference to TV broadcast operations.
The Commission permits broadcasters
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
32252
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Notices
to agree to proposed TV facilities that do
not conform to the allotted parameters,
even though they might be affected by
potential new interference. The
Commission will consider granting
applications on the basis of interference
agreements if it finds that such grants
will serve the public interest. These
agreements must be signed by all parties
to the agreement. In addition, the
Commission needs the following
information to enable such public
interest determinations: A list of parties
predicted to receive additional
interference from the proposed facility;
a showing as to why a grant based on
the agreements would serve the public
interest; and technical studies depicting
the additional interference. The
technical showings and interference
agreements will be used by FCC staff to
determine if the public interest would
be served by the grant of the application
and to ensure that the proposed
facilities will not result in additional
interference.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2013–12695 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than June 12,
2013.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
1. Barrett Capital Investments, LP,
John Barrett, General Partner and Susan
Barrett, General Partner, both of Athens,
Georgia; to acquire additional voting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:07 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
shares of NBG Bancorp, Inc., and
thereby indirectly acquire additional
voting shares of National Bank of
Georgia, both in Athens, Georgia.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, May 23, 2013.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2013–12663 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–13–0639]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call (404) 639–7570 or send an
email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806.
Written comments should be received
within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
EEOICPA Special Exposure Cohort
Petitions (OMB No. 0920–0639 exp. 9/
20/2013)—Extension—National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
On October 30, 2000, the Energy
Employees Occupational Illness
Compensation Program Act of 2000
(EEOICPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7384–7385
[1994, supp. 2001] was enacted. The Act
established a compensation program to
provide a lump sum payment of
$150,000 and medical benefits as
compensation to covered employees
suffering from designated illnesses
incurred as a result of their exposure to
radiation, beryllium, or silica while in
the performance of duty for the
Department of Energy and certain of its
vendors, contractors and subcontractors.
This legislation also provided for
payment of compensation for certain
survivors of these covered employees.
This program has been mandated to be
in effect until Congress ends the
funding.
Among other duties, the Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS)
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
was directed to establish and implement
procedures for considering petitions by
classes of nuclear weapons workers to
be added to the ‘‘Special Exposure
Cohort’’ (the ‘‘Cohort’’). In brief,
EEOICPA authorizes HHS to designate
such classes of employees for addition
to the Cohort when NIOSH lacks
sufficient information to estimate with
sufficient accuracy the radiation doses
of the employees, and if HHS also finds
that the health of members of the class
may have been endangered by the
radiation dose the class potentially
incurred. HHS must also obtain the
advice of the Advisory Board on
Radiation and Worker Health (the
‘‘Board’’) in establishing such findings.
On May 28, 2004, HHS issued a rule
that established procedures for adding
such classes to the Cohort (42 CFR Part
83). The rule was amended on July 10,
2007.
The HHS rule authorizes a variety of
respondents to submit petitions.
Petitioners are required to provide the
information specified in the rule to
qualify their petitions for a complete
evaluation by HHS and the Board. HHS
has developed two forms to assist the
petitioners in providing this required
information efficiently and completely.
Form A is a one-page form to be used
by EEOICPA claimants for whom
NIOSH has attempted to conduct dose
reconstructions and has determined that
available information is not sufficient to
complete the dose reconstruction. Form
B, accompanied by separate
instructions, is intended for all other
petitioners. Forms A and B can be
submitted electronically as well as in
hard copy. Respondent/petitioners
should be aware that HHS is not
requiring respondents to use the forms.
Respondents can choose to submit
petitions as letters or in other formats,
but petitions must meet the
informational requirements stated in the
rule. NIOSH expects, however, that all
petitioners for whom Form A would be
appropriate will actually use the form,
since NIOSH will provide it to them
upon determining that their dose
reconstruction cannot be completed and
encourage them to submit the petition.
NIOSH expects the large majority of
petitioners for whom Form B would be
appropriate will also use the form, since
it provides a simple, organized format
for addressing the informational
requirements of a petition.
NIOSH will use the information
obtained through the petition for the
following purposes: (a) Identify the
petitioner(s), obtain their contact
information, and establish that the
petitioner(s) is qualified and intends to
petition HHS; (b) establish an initial
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32251-32252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12695]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the
Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection
burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of
information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before July 29,
2013. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice,
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to the Federal Communications
Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0788.
Title: DTV Showings/Interference Agreements.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, Not-for-profit
institutions.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 300 respondents; 300
responses.
Estimated Hours per Response: 5 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement, Third
Party Disclosure requirement.
Total Annual Burden: 1,500 hours.
Total Annual Costs: $3,900,000.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
statutory authority for this collection is contained in Sections
154(i), 303 and 308 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for
confidentiality required with this collection of information.
Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.623 requires applicants to submit a
technical showing to establish that their proposed facilities will not
result in additional interference to TV broadcast operations. The
Commission permits broadcasters
[[Page 32252]]
to agree to proposed TV facilities that do not conform to the allotted
parameters, even though they might be affected by potential new
interference. The Commission will consider granting applications on the
basis of interference agreements if it finds that such grants will
serve the public interest. These agreements must be signed by all
parties to the agreement. In addition, the Commission needs the
following information to enable such public interest determinations: A
list of parties predicted to receive additional interference from the
proposed facility; a showing as to why a grant based on the agreements
would serve the public interest; and technical studies depicting the
additional interference. The technical showings and interference
agreements will be used by FCC staff to determine if the public
interest would be served by the grant of the application and to ensure
that the proposed facilities will not result in additional
interference.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-12695 Filed 5-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P