Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority, 32251-32252 [2013-12695]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Notices required to submit for EPA approval a security plan under which any CBI will be secured and protected against unauthorized release or compromise. No information will be provided to CDM Smith and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, until the requirements in this B. How can I get copies of this document document have been fully satisfied. and other related information? Records of information provided to EPA has established a docket for this CDM Smith and its subcontractor, action under docket identification (ID) Dynamac Corp, will be maintained by number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0036. EPA Project Officers for this contract. Publicly available docket materials are All information supplied to CDM Smith available either in the electronic docket and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, by at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only EPA for use in connection with this available in hard copy, at the Office of contract will be returned to EPA when Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory CDM Smith and its subcontractor, Public Docket in Rm. S–4400, One Dynamac Corp, have completed their Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. work. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of List of Subjects operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday Environmental protection, Business through Friday, excluding legal and industry, Government contracts, holidays. The Docket Facility telephone Government property, Pesticides and number is (703) 305–5805. pests, Security measures. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. II. Contractor Requirements Under Contract No. EP–W–11–020, CDM Smith and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, will perform support OPP in four general areas: Reviewing and evaluating studies provided by the registrants or found in open literature searches; producing assessments; reviewing submitted risk assessments; and developing or improving risk assessment methods. In addition, support may be required to provide training for EPA staff on issues related to the science and methods of risk assessment. Workshop organization and facilitation may also be required. OPP has determined that access by CDM Smith and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, to information on all pesticide chemicals is necessary for the performance of this contract. Some of this information may be entitled to confidential treatment. The information has been submitted to EPA under sections 3, 4, 6, and 7 of FIFRA and under sections 408 and 409 of FFDCA. In accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 2.307(h)(2), the contract with CDM Smith and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, prohibits use of the information for any purpose not specified in the contract; prohibits disclosure of the information to a third party without prior written approval from the Agency; and requires that each official and employee of the contractor sign an agreement to protect the information from unauthorized release and to handle it in accordance with the FIFRA Information Security Manual. In addition, CDM Smith and its subcontractor, Dynamac Corp, are VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:07 May 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 Dated: May 14, 2013. Oscar Morales, Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. 2013–12780 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32251 other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before July 29, 2013. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to the Federal Communications Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0788. Title: DTV Showings/Interference Agreements. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, Not-for-profit institutions. Number of Respondents and Responses: 300 respondents; 300 responses. Estimated Hours per Response: 5 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement, Third Party Disclosure requirement. Total Annual Burden: 1,500 hours. Total Annual Costs: $3,900,000. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection is contained in Sections 154(i), 303 and 308 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality required with this collection of information. Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s). Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.623 requires applicants to submit a technical showing to establish that their proposed facilities will not result in additional interference to TV broadcast operations. The Commission permits broadcasters E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM 29MYN1 32252 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Notices to agree to proposed TV facilities that do not conform to the allotted parameters, even though they might be affected by potential new interference. The Commission will consider granting applications on the basis of interference agreements if it finds that such grants will serve the public interest. These agreements must be signed by all parties to the agreement. In addition, the Commission needs the following information to enable such public interest determinations: A list of parties predicted to receive additional interference from the proposed facility; a showing as to why a grant based on the agreements would serve the public interest; and technical studies depicting the additional interference. The technical showings and interference agreements will be used by FCC staff to determine if the public interest would be served by the grant of the application and to ensure that the proposed facilities will not result in additional interference. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2013–12695 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than June 12, 2013. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309: 1. Barrett Capital Investments, LP, John Barrett, General Partner and Susan Barrett, General Partner, both of Athens, Georgia; to acquire additional voting VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:07 May 28, 2013 Jkt 229001 shares of NBG Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of National Bank of Georgia, both in Athens, Georgia. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 23, 2013. Margaret McCloskey Shanks, Deputy Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2013–12663 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30Day–13–0639] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call (404) 639–7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. Proposed Project EEOICPA Special Exposure Cohort Petitions (OMB No. 0920–0639 exp. 9/ 20/2013)—Extension—National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description On October 30, 2000, the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7384–7385 [1994, supp. 2001] was enacted. The Act established a compensation program to provide a lump sum payment of $150,000 and medical benefits as compensation to covered employees suffering from designated illnesses incurred as a result of their exposure to radiation, beryllium, or silica while in the performance of duty for the Department of Energy and certain of its vendors, contractors and subcontractors. This legislation also provided for payment of compensation for certain survivors of these covered employees. This program has been mandated to be in effect until Congress ends the funding. Among other duties, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 was directed to establish and implement procedures for considering petitions by classes of nuclear weapons workers to be added to the ‘‘Special Exposure Cohort’’ (the ‘‘Cohort’’). In brief, EEOICPA authorizes HHS to designate such classes of employees for addition to the Cohort when NIOSH lacks sufficient information to estimate with sufficient accuracy the radiation doses of the employees, and if HHS also finds that the health of members of the class may have been endangered by the radiation dose the class potentially incurred. HHS must also obtain the advice of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the ‘‘Board’’) in establishing such findings. On May 28, 2004, HHS issued a rule that established procedures for adding such classes to the Cohort (42 CFR Part 83). The rule was amended on July 10, 2007. The HHS rule authorizes a variety of respondents to submit petitions. Petitioners are required to provide the information specified in the rule to qualify their petitions for a complete evaluation by HHS and the Board. HHS has developed two forms to assist the petitioners in providing this required information efficiently and completely. Form A is a one-page form to be used by EEOICPA claimants for whom NIOSH has attempted to conduct dose reconstructions and has determined that available information is not sufficient to complete the dose reconstruction. Form B, accompanied by separate instructions, is intended for all other petitioners. Forms A and B can be submitted electronically as well as in hard copy. Respondent/petitioners should be aware that HHS is not requiring respondents to use the forms. Respondents can choose to submit petitions as letters or in other formats, but petitions must meet the informational requirements stated in the rule. NIOSH expects, however, that all petitioners for whom Form A would be appropriate will actually use the form, since NIOSH will provide it to them upon determining that their dose reconstruction cannot be completed and encourage them to submit the petition. NIOSH expects the large majority of petitioners for whom Form B would be appropriate will also use the form, since it provides a simple, organized format for addressing the informational requirements of a petition. NIOSH will use the information obtained through the petition for the following purposes: (a) Identify the petitioner(s), obtain their contact information, and establish that the petitioner(s) is qualified and intends to petition HHS; (b) establish an initial E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM 29MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32251-32252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12695]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal 
Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following information collection, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Comments are requested concerning whether 
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the 
Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of 
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection 
burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
    The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be 
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of 
information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before July 29, 
2013. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find 
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, 
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to the Federal Communications 
Commission via email to PRA@fcc.gov and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Control Number: 3060-0788.
    Title: DTV Showings/Interference Agreements.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Number of Respondents and Responses: 300 respondents; 300 
responses.
    Estimated Hours per Response: 5 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement, Third 
Party Disclosure requirement.
    Total Annual Burden: 1,500 hours.
    Total Annual Costs: $3,900,000.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The 
statutory authority for this collection is contained in Sections 
154(i), 303 and 308 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for 
confidentiality required with this collection of information.
    Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
    Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 73.623 requires applicants to submit a 
technical showing to establish that their proposed facilities will not 
result in additional interference to TV broadcast operations. The 
Commission permits broadcasters

[[Page 32252]]

to agree to proposed TV facilities that do not conform to the allotted 
parameters, even though they might be affected by potential new 
interference. The Commission will consider granting applications on the 
basis of interference agreements if it finds that such grants will 
serve the public interest. These agreements must be signed by all 
parties to the agreement. In addition, the Commission needs the 
following information to enable such public interest determinations: A 
list of parties predicted to receive additional interference from the 
proposed facility; a showing as to why a grant based on the agreements 
would serve the public interest; and technical studies depicting the 
additional interference. The technical showings and interference 
agreements will be used by FCC staff to determine if the public 
interest would be served by the grant of the application and to ensure 
that the proposed facilities will not result in additional 
interference.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-12695 Filed 5-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.