Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft Industries a.s. Airplanes, 32081-32084 [2013-12517]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Gulfstream apply at a later date for a
supplemental type certificate to modify
any other model included on Type
Certificate No. A16NM to incorporate
the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on
Gulfstream Model G280 airplanes. It is
not a rule of general applicability and it
affects only the applicant who applied
to the FAA for approval of these features
on the airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the typecertification basis for Gulfstream Model
G280 airplanes modified by Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation.
1. The EFVS imagery on the HUD
must not degrade the safety of flight or
interfere with the effective use of
outside visual references for required
pilot tasks during any phase of flight in
which it is to be used.
2. To avoid unacceptable interference
with the safe and effective use of the
pilot-compartment view, the EFVS
device must meet the following
requirements:
a. EFVS design must minimize
unacceptable display characteristics or
artifacts (e.g. noise, ‘‘burlap’’ overlay,
running water droplets) that obscure the
desired image of the scene, impair the
pilot’s ability to detect and identify
visual references, mask flight hazards,
distract the pilot, or otherwise degrade
task performance or safety.
b. Control of EFVS display brightness
must be sufficiently effective, in
dynamically changing background
(ambient) lighting conditions, to prevent
full or partial blooming of the display
that would distract the pilot, impair the
pilot’s ability to detect and identify
visual references, mask flight hazards,
or otherwise degrade task performance
or safety. If automatic control for image
brightness is not provided, it must be
shown that a single manual setting is
satisfactory for the range of lighting
conditions encountered during a timecritical, high-workload phase of flight
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
(e.g., low-visibility instrument
approach).
c. A readily accessible control must be
provided that permits the pilot to
immediately deactivate and reactivate
display of the EFVS image on demand
without removing the pilot’s hands from
the primary flight controls (yoke or
equivalent) or thrust control.
d. The EFVS image on the HUD must
not impair the pilot’s use of guidance
information, or degrade the presentation
and pilot awareness of essential flight
information displayed on the HUD, such
as alerts, airspeed, attitude, altitude and
direction, approach guidance, wind
shear guidance, TCAS resolution
advisories, and unusual-attitude
recovery cues.
e. The EFVS image and the HUD
symbols, which are spatially referenced
to the pitch scale, outside view, and
image, must be scaled and aligned (i.e.,
conformal) to the external scene and,
when considered singly or in
combination, must not be misleading,
cause pilot confusion, or increase
workload. Some airplane attitudes or
cross-wind conditions may cause
certain symbols, such as the zero-pitch
line or flight-path vector, to reach fieldof-view limits such that they cannot be
positioned conformably with the image
and external scene. In such cases, these
symbols may be displayed, but with an
altered appearance which makes the
pilot aware that they are no longer
displayed conformably (for example,
‘‘ghosting’’).
f. A HUD system used to display
EFVS images must, if previously
certified, continue to meet all of the
requirements of the original approval.
3. The safety and performance of the
pilot tasks associated with the use of the
pilot-compartment view must not be
degraded by the display of the EFVS
image. Pilot tasks that must not be
degraded by the EFVS image include:
a. Detection, accurate identification,
and maneuvering, as necessary, to avoid
traffic, terrain, obstacles, and other
hazards of flight.
b. Accurate identification and
utilization of visual references required
for every task relevant to the phase of
flight.
4. Appropriate limitations must be
stated in the Operating Limitations
section of the Airplane Flight Manual to
prohibit the use of the EFVS for
functions for which EFVS has not been
found to be acceptable.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32081
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 22,
2013.
Jeff Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–12605 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0456; Directorate
Identifier 2013–CE–011–AD; Amendment
39–17462; AD 2013–11–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft
Industries a.s. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Aircraft
Industries a.s. Model L–420 airplanes.
This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) issued by the aviation authority
of another country to identify and
correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as in-flight engine
flame out occurred at take-off with
water injection after reduction of engine
power. We are issuing this AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 18,
2013.
We must receive comments on this
AD by July 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
32082
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4059; fax: (816) 329–4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued AD No. 2013–
0097, dated April 24, 2013 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Currently, the automatic switching off of
the water injection system as installed on L–
410 and L–420 aeroplanes stops the water
injection into the engines during engine
power reduction when throttle control levers
pass the position corresponding to 88–92%
of gas generator speed.
During a recent event, in-flight engine
flame out occurred at take-off with water
injection after reduction of engine power.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to further events of uncommanded in-flight
engine shut-down or power loss, possibly
resulting in forced landing, with consequent
damage to the aeroplane and injury to
occupants.
Prompted by this occurrence, a procedure
has been developed, instructing the flight
crew to switch off the water injection system,
prior to engine power reduction, to prevent
any possible engine flame out.
For the reasons described above, this AD
requires an amendment of the Aircraft Flight
Manual (AFM) by implementation of a
procedure to manually switch off the water
injection system, prior to any engine power
reduction.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this
AD because we evaluated all
information provided by the State of
Design Authority and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the
same type design.
FAA’s Determination of the Effective
Date
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD. The FAA has found that the risk to
the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because there are no airplanes
currently on the U.S. registry and thus,
does not have any impact upon the
public. Therefore, we find that notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment are unnecessary and that good
cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety, and
we did not precede it by notice and
opportunity for public comment. We
invite you to send any written relevant
data, views, or arguments about this AD.
Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2013–0456;
Directorate Identifier 2013–CE–011–
AD’’ at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
this AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 0
products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 1 workhour per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to
be $0, or $0 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective June 18, 2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Aircraft Industries a.s.
Model L–420 airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.
condition, which, if not corrected, could lead
to further events of uncommanded in-flight
engine shut-down or power loss, possibly
resulting in forced landing, with consequent
damage to the airplane and injury to
occupants.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, within 30 days after
June 18, 2013 (the effective date of this AD),
amend the applicable airplane flight manual
(AFM) by inserting a copy of Appendix 1 of
this AD, opposite the appropriate AFM page
on which the water injection procedure is
described.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 82: Water Injection.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as in-flight
engine flame out occurred at take-off with
water injection after reduction of engine
power. We are issuing this AD to correct this
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2013–0097, dated
April 24, 2013, for related information.
Appendix 1 to AD 2013–11–02
AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL (AFM)
PROCEDURE TO CONTROL WATER
INJECTION SYSTEM for Aircraft
Industries a.s. Model L–420 Airplanes
Appendix 1—AFM procedure
Procedure to Control Water Injection
System
WATER INJECTION circuit breakter .....................................................................................................................
TCL ..........................................................................................................................................................................
WATER INJECTION/ON push-button ...................................................................................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Before throttling back power:
WATER INJECTION/OFF push-button .................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
29MYR1
ON
TQ=min. 60%
Push and hold till amber
WATER INJECTION signal
comes on (on the front
control panel)
Push and check amber
WATER INJECTION signal
extinguishes
ER29MY13.000
2013–11–02 Aircraft Industries a.s.:
Amendment 39–17462; Docket No.
FAA–2013–0456; Directorate Identifier
2013–CE–011–AD.
32083
32084
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May
20, 2013.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–12517 Filed 5–28–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0371; Airspace
Docket No. 12–ANM–11]
Modification of Class D and Class E
Airspace; Pueblo, CO
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies Class D
airspace and Class E airspace areas at
Pueblo Memorial Airport, Pueblo, CO,
to accommodate aircraft using VHF
Omni-Directional Radio Range/Distance
Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME)
standard instrument approach
procedures at Pueblo Memorial Airport.
This improves the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.
Adjustments to the geographic
coordinates of the airport also are made.
DATES: Effective date, 0901 UTC, August
22, 2013. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
History
On February 21, 2013, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to modify controlled airspace at Pueblo,
CO (78 FR 11996). Interested parties
were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received.
Class D and Class E airspace
designations are published in
paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004 and 6005,
respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9W
dated August 8, 2012, and effective
September 15, 2012, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 May 28, 2013
Jkt 229001
71.1. The Class D and Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in that
Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by
modifying Class D airspace, Class E
airspace designated as surface area,
Class E airspace designated as an
extension to Class D surface area, and
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface, at Pueblo,
CO, to accommodate IFR aircraft using
VOR/DME standard instrument
approach procedures at the airport. The
geographic coordinates of the airport for
the Class D and Class E airspace areas
are updated to coincide with the FAA’s
aeronautical database. This action is
necessary for the safety and
management of IFR operations.
The FAA has determined this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA’s
authority to issue rules regarding
aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the
U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
discusses the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the
scope of the agency’s authority. This
rulemaking is promulgated under the
authority described in Subtitle VII, Part
A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it modifies
controlled airspace at Pueblo Memorial
Airport, Pueblo, CO.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, and
effective September 15, 2012 is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM CO D Pueblo, CO [Modified]
Pueblo Memorial Airport, CO
(Lat. 38°17′21″ N., long. 104°29′47″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 7,200 feet MSL
within a 5.6-mile radius of the Pueblo
Memorial Airport. This Class D airspace area
is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated
as surface areas.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM CO E2 Pueblo, CO [Modified]
Pueblo Memorial Airport, CO
(Lat. 38°17′21″ N., long. 104°29′47″ W.)
Within a 5.6-mile radius of the Pueblo
Memorial Airport. This Class E airspace area
is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace areas
designated as an extension to a Class D
surface area.
*
E:\FR\FM\29MYR1.SGM
*
*
29MYR1
*
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32081-32084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12517]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0456; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-011-AD;
Amendment 39-17462; AD 2013-11-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Aircraft Industries a.s. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Aircraft Industries a.s. Model L-420 airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as in-flight engine flame out occurred at take-off with water
injection after reduction of engine power. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 18, 2013.
We must receive comments on this AD by July 15, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106.
[[Page 32082]]
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No. 2013-0097, dated April 24, 2013 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:
Currently, the automatic switching off of the water injection
system as installed on L-410 and L-420 aeroplanes stops the water
injection into the engines during engine power reduction when
throttle control levers pass the position corresponding to 88-92% of
gas generator speed.
During a recent event, in-flight engine flame out occurred at
take-off with water injection after reduction of engine power.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to further events
of uncommanded in-flight engine shut-down or power loss, possibly
resulting in forced landing, with consequent damage to the aeroplane
and injury to occupants.
Prompted by this occurrence, a procedure has been developed,
instructing the flight crew to switch off the water injection
system, prior to engine power reduction, to prevent any possible
engine flame out.
For the reasons described above, this AD requires an amendment
of the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) by implementation of a procedure
to manually switch off the water injection system, prior to any
engine power reduction.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because there
are no airplanes currently on the U.S. registry and thus, does not have
any impact upon the public. Therefore, we find that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment are unnecessary and that good
cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0456; Directorate
Identifier 2013-CE-011-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 0 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $0, or $0 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
[[Page 32083]]
2013-11-02 Aircraft Industries a.s.: Amendment 39-17462; Docket No.
FAA-2013-0456; Directorate Identifier 2013-CE-011-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 18,
2013.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Aircraft Industries a.s. Model L-420
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 82: Water
Injection.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as in-flight engine
flame out occurred at take-off with water injection after reduction
of engine power. We are issuing this AD to correct this condition,
which, if not corrected, could lead to further events of uncommanded
in-flight engine shut-down or power loss, possibly resulting in
forced landing, with consequent damage to the airplane and injury to
occupants.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, within 30 days after June 18, 2013 (the
effective date of this AD), amend the applicable airplane flight
manual (AFM) by inserting a copy of Appendix 1 of this AD, opposite
the appropriate AFM page on which the water injection procedure is
described.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2013-0097, dated April 24, 2013, for related information.
Appendix 1 to AD 2013-11-02
AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL (AFM)
PROCEDURE TO CONTROL WATER INJECTION SYSTEM for Aircraft Industries
a.s. Model L-420 Airplanes
Appendix 1--AFM procedure
Procedure to Control Water Injection System
WATER INJECTION circuit ON
breakter.
TCL.......................... TQ=min. 60%
WATER INJECTION/ON push- Push and hold till amber
button. WATER INJECTION signal comes on (on
the front control panel)
Before throttling back power: .....................................
WATER INJECTION/OFF push- Push and check amber
button. WATER INJECTION signal extinguishes
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR29MY13.000
[[Page 32084]]
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 20, 2013.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-12517 Filed 5-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P