Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 31968-31970 [2013-12580]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
31968
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices
Tom.Harrington@fema.dhs.gov. You
may contact the Records Management
Division for copies of the proposed
collection of information at facsimile
number (202) 646–3347 or email
address: FEMA-Information-CollectionsManagement@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA,
Grant Programs Directorate (GPD)
awards thousands of grants and each
year through various grant programs.
These programs award funds for
projects used to improve homeland
security and emergency preparedness.
The National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA), Public Law 91–190,
Sec. 102(B) and (C), 42 U.S.C. 4332, the
National Historic Preservation Act of
1966 (NHPA), Public Law 89–665, 16
U.S.C. 470f and a variety of other
environmental and historic preservation
laws and Executive Orders (EO) require
the Federal government to examine the
potential impacts of its proposed actions
on communities, public health and
safety, and cultural, historic, and
natural resources prior to undertaking
those actions. The GPD process of
considering these potential impacts is
called an environmental and historic
preservation (EHP) review which is
employed to examine compliance with
multiple EHP authorities through one
consolidated process. With input from
grantees, the EHP Screening Form was
revised for clarity and ease of use. The
2013 Screening Form does not require
any new information, and includes an
appendix with guidance on providing
photographs with the EHP submission.
Grantees are no longer required to
submit floodplain and wetlands maps,
or information about the proposed
project’s relationship to an existing
master plan.
Collection of Information
Title: Environmental and Historic
Preservation Screening Form.
OMB Number: 1660–0115.
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 024–0–1,
Environmental and Historic
Preservation Screening Form.
Abstract: NEPA requires that each
Federal agency to examine the impact of
its actions (including the actions of
grantees using grant funds) on the
human environment, to look at potential
alternatives to that action, and to inform
both decision-makers and the public of
those impacts through a transparent
process. This Screening Form will
facilitate FEMA’s review of grantees
actions in FEMA’s effort to comply with
the environmental requirements.
Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal
Government; not-for-profit institutions.
Number of Respondents: 3,000.
Number of Responses: 3,000.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 24,000 hours.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS
No. of
respondents
No. of
responses per
respondent
Total No. of
responses
Avg.
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total annual
burden
(in hours)
Avg. hourly
wage rate
Total annual
respondent
cost
2,800
1
2,800
8 hours
22,400
$42.10
$943,040
Not-for-Profit Institutions ......
Environmental and Historic
Preservation Screening
Form/FEMA Form 024–0–
1.
Environmental and Historic
Preservation Screening
Form/FEMA Form 024–0–
1.
200
1
200
8 hours
1,600
42.10
67,360
Total .............................
.............................................
3,000
........................
3,000
....................
24,000
....................
1,010,400
Type of respondent
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Form name/Form number
• Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Estimated Cost: The estimated annual
cost to respondents for the hour burden
is $1,010,400.00. There are no annual
costs to respondents operations and
maintenance costs for technical
services. There is no annual start-up or
capital costs. The cost to the Federal
Government is $5,394,630.00.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments
Comments may be submitted as
indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a)
evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: May 20, 2013.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division,
Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013–12576 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID: [FEMA–2013–0020] OMB No.
1660–0114]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 9111–19–P
PO 00000
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency
Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on a revision of a currently
approved information collection. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, this notice seeks
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
31969
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices
comments concerning the information
collection activities required to
administer the Port Security Grant
Program (PSGP).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate
submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to
submit comments:
(1) Online. Submit comments at
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA–2013–0020. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
(2) Mail. Submit written comments to
Docket Manager, Office of Chief
Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472–3100.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and Docket ID.
Regardless of the method used for
submitting comments or material, all
submissions will be posted, without
change, to the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov,
and will include any personal
information you provide. Therefore,
submitting this information makes it
public. You may wish to read the
Privacy Act notice that is available via
the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Hall, Program Manager, FEMA,
Grant Programs Directorate, (202) 786–
9778. You may contact the Records
Management Division for copies of the
proposed collection of information at
facsimile number (202) 646–3347 or
email address: FEMA-InformationCollections-Management@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Port
Security Grant Program (PSGP) is a DHS
grant program that focuses on
infrastructure protection activities. The
PSGP is one tool in the comprehensive
set of measures authorized by Congress
and implemented by the Administration
to strengthen the Nation’s critical
infrastructure against risks associated
with potential terrorist attacks. The vast
bulk of U.S. critical infrastructure is
owned and/or operated by State, local
and private sector partners. PSGP funds
support increased port-wide risk
management; enhanced domain
awareness; training and exercises; and
further capabilities to prevent, detect,
respond to, and recover from attacks
involving improvised explosive devices
(IEDs) and other non-conventional
weapons. Section 102 of the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002, as
amended (46 U.S.C. 70107), established
the PSGP to provide for the
establishment of a grant program for a
risk-based allocation of funds to
implement Area Maritime
Transportation Security Plans and
facility security plans among port
authorities, facility operators, and State
and local government agencies required
to provide port security services.
Collection of Information
Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants:
Port Security Grant Program (PSGP).
OMB Number: 1660–0114.
Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 089–5,
PSGP Investment Justification.
Abstract: The PSGP is an important
tool among a comprehensive set of
measures to help strengthen the Nation
against risks associated with potential
terrorist attacks. DHS/FEMA uses the
information to evaluate applicants’
familiarity with the national
preparedness architecture and identify
how elements of this architecture have
been incorporated into regional/state/
local planning, operations, and
investments.
Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal
Government; business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 370.
Number of Responses: 1,112.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 17,414 hours.
State Table
TABLE A.12—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS
Type of respondent
State, Local or Tribal Government.
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Total .............................
Avg.
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total annual
burden
(in hours)
Avg. hourly
wage rate *
Total annual
respondent
cost
224
16
3,584
$52.91
$189,629.44
1
4
2
8
52.91
423.28
........................
228
....................
3,592
....................
190,052.72
Avg.
burden per
response
(in hours)
Total annual
burden
(in hours)
Avg. hourly
wage rate *
Total annual
respondent
cost
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
PSGP Investment Justification/FEMA Form 089–5.
PSGP—Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) or
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).
56
4
4
.............................................
60
Form name/Form No.
Total
number of
responses
* Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Local Table
TABLE A.12—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses
per
respondent
PSGP Investment Justification/FEMA Form 089–5.
PSGP—Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).
128
3
384
16
6,144
$52.91
$325,079.04
17
1
17
2
34
52.91
1,798.94
................................................
145
....................
401
....................
6,178
....................
326,877.98
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Type of respondent
Form name/Form No.
State, Local or Tribal Government.
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Total ...............................
Total
number of
responses
* Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Business or Other For-Profit Table
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:46 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
31970
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices
TABLE A.12—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS
Avg. hourly
wage rate *
Total annual
respondent
cost
477
16
7,632
$52.91
$403,809.12
1
6
2
12
52.91
634.92
........................
........................
483
1,112
....................
....................
7,644
17,414
....................
....................
404,444.04
921,374.74
PSGP Investment Justification/FEMA Form 089–5.
PSGP—Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) or
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA).
159
3
6
.............................................
.............................................
165
370
Business or other for-profit ..
Total .............................
Grand Total ...........
Total annual
burden
(in hours)
Number of
responses per
respondent
Form name/Form No.
Business or other for-profit ..
Avg.
burden per
response
(in hours)
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Total
number of
responses
* Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Estimated Cost: The estimated annual
cost to respondents for the hour burden
is $921,374.74. There are no annual
costs to respondents operations and
maintenance costs for technical
services. There is no annual start-up or
capital costs. The cost to the Federal
Government is $897,447.60.
Comments may be submitted as
indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a)
evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: May 20, 2013.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division,
Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013–12580 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–19–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Accreditation and Approval of SGS
North America, Inc., as a Commercial
Gauger and Laboratory
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of accreditation and
approval of SGS North America, Inc., as
a commercial gauger and laboratory.
AGENCY:
Comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
17:46 May 24, 2013
Jkt 229001
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to CBP regulations, that SGS
North America, Inc., has been approved
to gauge and accredited to test
petroleum and petroleum products,
organic chemicals and vegetable oils for
customs purposes for the next three
years as of November 8, 2012.
DATES: Effective Dates: The
accreditation and approval of SGS North
America, Inc., as commercial gauger and
laboratory became effective on
November 8, 2012. The next triennial
inspection date will be scheduled for
November 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Approved Gauger and Accredited
Laboratories Manager, Laboratories and
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington,
DC 20229, tel. 202–344–1060.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given pursuant to 19 CPR 151.12
and 19 CPR 151.13, that SGS North
America, Inc., 300 George Street, East
Alton, IL 62024, has been approved to
gauge and accredited to test petroleum
and petroleum products, organic
chemicals and vegetable oils for
customs purposes, in accordance with
the provisions of 19 CPR 151.12 and 19
CPR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ
this entity to conduct laboratory
analyses and gauger services should
request and receive written assurances
from the entity that it is accredited or
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approved by the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to conduct the
specific test or gauger service requested.
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the
specific test or gauger service this entity
is accredited or approved to perform
may be directed to the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection by calling (202) 344–
1060. The inquiry may also be sent to
cbp.labhq@dhs.gov. Please reference the
Web site listed below for a complete
listing of CBP approved gaugers and
accredited laboratories. https://cbp.gov/
linkhandler/cgov/trade/basic trade/labs
scientific svcs/commercial gaugers/
gaulist.ct.tlgaulist.pdf.
Dated: May 17, 2013.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and
Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2013–12554 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5719–N–01]
Notice of Submission of Proposed
Information Collection to OMB; Federal
Labor Standards Payee Verification
and Payment Processing
Office of Labor Relations, HUD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection requirement described below
will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. HUD is soliciting public
comments on the subject proposal. The
information collected by HUD is used to
issue refunds to depositors where labor
standards discrepancies have been
resolved, and to issue wage restitution
payments on behalf of construction and
maintenance workers who have been
underpaid for work performed on HUDassisted projects subject to prevailing
wage requirements.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31968-31970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12580]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[Docket ID: [FEMA-2013-0020] OMB No. 1660-0114]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a revision of a currently approved information
collection. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
this notice seeks
[[Page 31969]]
comments concerning the information collection activities required to
administer the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 29, 2013.
ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to submit comments:
(1) Online. Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
FEMA-2013-0020. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
(2) Mail. Submit written comments to Docket Manager, Office of
Chief Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472-3100.
All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available via the link in the footer of
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Hall, Program Manager, FEMA,
Grant Programs Directorate, (202) 786-9778. You may contact the Records
Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of
information at facsimile number (202) 646-3347 or email address: FEMA-Information-Collections-Management@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) is a
DHS grant program that focuses on infrastructure protection activities.
The PSGP is one tool in the comprehensive set of measures authorized by
Congress and implemented by the Administration to strengthen the
Nation's critical infrastructure against risks associated with
potential terrorist attacks. The vast bulk of U.S. critical
infrastructure is owned and/or operated by State, local and private
sector partners. PSGP funds support increased port-wide risk
management; enhanced domain awareness; training and exercises; and
further capabilities to prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from
attacks involving improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and other non-
conventional weapons. Section 102 of the Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002, as amended (46 U.S.C. 70107), established the
PSGP to provide for the establishment of a grant program for a risk-
based allocation of funds to implement Area Maritime Transportation
Security Plans and facility security plans among port authorities,
facility operators, and State and local government agencies required to
provide port security services.
Collection of Information
Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants: Port Security Grant Program
(PSGP).
OMB Number: 1660-0114.
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 089-5, PSGP Investment Justification.
Abstract: The PSGP is an important tool among a comprehensive set
of measures to help strengthen the Nation against risks associated with
potential terrorist attacks. DHS/FEMA uses the information to evaluate
applicants' familiarity with the national preparedness architecture and
identify how elements of this architecture have been incorporated into
regional/state/local planning, operations, and investments.
Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government; business or
other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 370.
Number of Responses: 1,112.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,414 hours.
State Table
Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg. Total Total
Number of Number of Total burden per annual Avg. hourly annual
Type of respondent Form name/Form No. respondents responses per number of response burden (in wage rate * respondent
respondent responses (in hours) hours) cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local or Tribal Government.. PSGP Investment 56 4 224 16 3,584 $52.91 $189,629.44
Justification/FEMA
Form 089-5.
State, Local or Tribal Government.. PSGP--Memorandum of 4 1 4 2 8 52.91 423.28
Understanding (MOU)
or Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.......................... ..................... 60 .............. 228 ........... 3,592 ........... 190,052.72
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Local Table
Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Avg. Total Total
Number of responses Total burden per annual Avg. hourly annual
Type of respondent Form name/Form No. respondents per number of response burden (in wage rate * respondent
respondent responses (in hours) hours) cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local or Tribal Government... PSGP Investment 128 3 384 16 6,144 $52.91 $325,079.04
Justification/FEMA
Form 089-5.
State, Local or Tribal Government... PSGP--Memorandum of 17 1 17 2 34 52.91 1,798.94
Understanding (MOU) or
Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... ....................... 145 ........... 401 ........... 6,178 ........... 326,877.98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Business or Other For-Profit Table
[[Page 31970]]
Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avg. Total Total
Number of Number of Total burden per annual Avg. hourly annual
Type of respondent Form name/Form No. respondents responses per number of response burden (in wage rate * respondent
respondent responses (in hours) hours) cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business or other for-profit....... PSGP Investment 159 3 477 16 7,632 $52.91 $403,809.12
Justification/FEMA
Form 089-5.
Business or other for-profit....... PSGP--Memorandum of 6 1 6 2 12 52.91 634.92
Understanding (MOU)
or Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.......................... ..................... 165 .............. 483 ........... 7,644 ........... 404,444.04
Grand Total................ ..................... 370 .............. 1,112 ........... 17,414 ........... 921,374.74
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.
Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the
hour burden is $921,374.74. There are no annual costs to respondents
operations and maintenance costs for technical services. There is no
annual start-up or capital costs. The cost to the Federal Government is
$897,447.60.
Comments
Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
Dated: May 20, 2013.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-12580 Filed 5-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-19-P
