Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 31968-31970 [2013-12580]

Download as PDF 31968 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices Tom.Harrington@fema.dhs.gov. You may contact the Records Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of information at facsimile number (202) 646–3347 or email address: FEMA-Information-CollectionsManagement@dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA, Grant Programs Directorate (GPD) awards thousands of grants and each year through various grant programs. These programs award funds for projects used to improve homeland security and emergency preparedness. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Public Law 91–190, Sec. 102(B) and (C), 42 U.S.C. 4332, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), Public Law 89–665, 16 U.S.C. 470f and a variety of other environmental and historic preservation laws and Executive Orders (EO) require the Federal government to examine the potential impacts of its proposed actions on communities, public health and safety, and cultural, historic, and natural resources prior to undertaking those actions. The GPD process of considering these potential impacts is called an environmental and historic preservation (EHP) review which is employed to examine compliance with multiple EHP authorities through one consolidated process. With input from grantees, the EHP Screening Form was revised for clarity and ease of use. The 2013 Screening Form does not require any new information, and includes an appendix with guidance on providing photographs with the EHP submission. Grantees are no longer required to submit floodplain and wetlands maps, or information about the proposed project’s relationship to an existing master plan. Collection of Information Title: Environmental and Historic Preservation Screening Form. OMB Number: 1660–0115. Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved information collection. FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 024–0–1, Environmental and Historic Preservation Screening Form. Abstract: NEPA requires that each Federal agency to examine the impact of its actions (including the actions of grantees using grant funds) on the human environment, to look at potential alternatives to that action, and to inform both decision-makers and the public of those impacts through a transparent process. This Screening Form will facilitate FEMA’s review of grantees actions in FEMA’s effort to comply with the environmental requirements. Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government; not-for-profit institutions. Number of Respondents: 3,000. Number of Responses: 3,000. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 24,000 hours. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS No. of respondents No. of responses per respondent Total No. of responses Avg. burden per response (in hours) Total annual burden (in hours) Avg. hourly wage rate Total annual respondent cost 2,800 1 2,800 8 hours 22,400 $42.10 $943,040 Not-for-Profit Institutions ...... Environmental and Historic Preservation Screening Form/FEMA Form 024–0– 1. Environmental and Historic Preservation Screening Form/FEMA Form 024–0– 1. 200 1 200 8 hours 1,600 42.10 67,360 Total ............................. ............................................. 3,000 ........................ 3,000 .................... 24,000 .................... 1,010,400 Type of respondent State, Local or Tribal Government. Form name/Form number • Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate. Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the hour burden is $1,010,400.00. There are no annual costs to respondents operations and maintenance costs for technical services. There is no annual start-up or capital costs. The cost to the Federal Government is $5,394,630.00. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Comments Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 May 24, 2013 Jkt 229001 who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Dated: May 20, 2013. Charlene D. Myrthil, Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2013–12576 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Federal Emergency Management Agency [Docket ID: [FEMA–2013–0020] OMB No. 1660–0114] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: BILLING CODE 9111–19–P PO 00000 SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on a revision of a currently approved information collection. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice seeks Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1 31969 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices comments concerning the information collection activities required to administer the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP). DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 29, 2013. ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use only one of the following means to submit comments: (1) Online. Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID FEMA–2013–0020. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. (2) Mail. Submit written comments to Docket Manager, Office of Chief Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472–3100. All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material, all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act notice that is available via the link in the footer of www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Hall, Program Manager, FEMA, Grant Programs Directorate, (202) 786– 9778. You may contact the Records Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of information at facsimile number (202) 646–3347 or email address: FEMA-InformationCollections-Management@dhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) is a DHS grant program that focuses on infrastructure protection activities. The PSGP is one tool in the comprehensive set of measures authorized by Congress and implemented by the Administration to strengthen the Nation’s critical infrastructure against risks associated with potential terrorist attacks. The vast bulk of U.S. critical infrastructure is owned and/or operated by State, local and private sector partners. PSGP funds support increased port-wide risk management; enhanced domain awareness; training and exercises; and further capabilities to prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from attacks involving improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and other non-conventional weapons. Section 102 of the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, as amended (46 U.S.C. 70107), established the PSGP to provide for the establishment of a grant program for a risk-based allocation of funds to implement Area Maritime Transportation Security Plans and facility security plans among port authorities, facility operators, and State and local government agencies required to provide port security services. Collection of Information Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants: Port Security Grant Program (PSGP). OMB Number: 1660–0114. Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved information collection. FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 089–5, PSGP Investment Justification. Abstract: The PSGP is an important tool among a comprehensive set of measures to help strengthen the Nation against risks associated with potential terrorist attacks. DHS/FEMA uses the information to evaluate applicants’ familiarity with the national preparedness architecture and identify how elements of this architecture have been incorporated into regional/state/ local planning, operations, and investments. Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government; business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents: 370. Number of Responses: 1,112. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,414 hours. State Table TABLE A.12—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS Type of respondent State, Local or Tribal Government. State, Local or Tribal Government. Total ............................. Avg. burden per response (in hours) Total annual burden (in hours) Avg. hourly wage rate * Total annual respondent cost 224 16 3,584 $52.91 $189,629.44 1 4 2 8 52.91 423.28 ........................ 228 .................... 3,592 .................... 190,052.72 Avg. burden per response (in hours) Total annual burden (in hours) Avg. hourly wage rate * Total annual respondent cost Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent PSGP Investment Justification/FEMA Form 089–5. PSGP—Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). 56 4 4 ............................................. 60 Form name/Form No. Total number of responses * Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate. Local Table TABLE A.12—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent PSGP Investment Justification/FEMA Form 089–5. PSGP—Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). 128 3 384 16 6,144 $52.91 $325,079.04 17 1 17 2 34 52.91 1,798.94 ................................................ 145 .................... 401 .................... 6,178 .................... 326,877.98 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Type of respondent Form name/Form No. State, Local or Tribal Government. State, Local or Tribal Government. Total ............................... Total number of responses * Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate. Business or Other For-Profit Table VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:46 May 24, 2013 Jkt 229001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1 31970 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 28, 2013 / Notices TABLE A.12—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS AND COSTS Avg. hourly wage rate * Total annual respondent cost 477 16 7,632 $52.91 $403,809.12 1 6 2 12 52.91 634.92 ........................ ........................ 483 1,112 .................... .................... 7,644 17,414 .................... .................... 404,444.04 921,374.74 PSGP Investment Justification/FEMA Form 089–5. PSGP—Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). 159 3 6 ............................................. ............................................. 165 370 Business or other for-profit .. Total ............................. Grand Total ........... Total annual burden (in hours) Number of responses per respondent Form name/Form No. Business or other for-profit .. Avg. burden per response (in hours) Number of respondents Type of respondent Total number of responses * Note: The ‘‘Avg. Hourly Wage Rate’’ for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate. Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the hour burden is $921,374.74. There are no annual costs to respondents operations and maintenance costs for technical services. There is no annual start-up or capital costs. The cost to the Federal Government is $897,447.60. Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Dated: May 20, 2013. Charlene D. Myrthil, Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2013–12580 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–19–P mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES U.S. Customs and Border Protection Accreditation and Approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory. AGENCY: Comments VerDate Mar<15>2010 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 17:46 May 24, 2013 Jkt 229001 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to CBP regulations, that SGS North America, Inc., has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes for the next three years as of November 8, 2012. DATES: Effective Dates: The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on November 8, 2012. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for November 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Approved Gauger and Accredited Laboratories Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, tel. 202–344–1060. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 19 CPR 151.12 and 19 CPR 151.13, that SGS North America, Inc., 300 George Street, East Alton, IL 62024, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CPR 151.12 and 19 CPR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344– 1060. The inquiry may also be sent to cbp.labhq@dhs.gov. Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/ linkhandler/cgov/trade/basic trade/labs scientific svcs/commercial gaugers/ gaulist.ct.tlgaulist.pdf. Dated: May 17, 2013. Ira S. Reese, Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services. [FR Doc. 2013–12554 Filed 5–24–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT [Docket No. FR–5719–N–01] Notice of Submission of Proposed Information Collection to OMB; Federal Labor Standards Payee Verification and Payment Processing Office of Labor Relations, HUD. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The proposed information collection requirement described below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. HUD is soliciting public comments on the subject proposal. The information collected by HUD is used to issue refunds to depositors where labor standards discrepancies have been resolved, and to issue wage restitution payments on behalf of construction and maintenance workers who have been underpaid for work performed on HUDassisted projects subject to prevailing wage requirements. E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31968-31970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: [FEMA-2013-0020] OMB No. 1660-0114]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites 
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity 
to comment on a revision of a currently approved information 
collection. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
this notice seeks

[[Page 31969]]

comments concerning the information collection activities required to 
administer the Port Security Grant Program (PSGP).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 29, 2013.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use 
only one of the following means to submit comments:
    (1) Online. Submit comments at www.regulations.gov under Docket ID 
FEMA-2013-0020. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    (2) Mail. Submit written comments to Docket Manager, Office of 
Chief Counsel, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472-3100.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket 
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material, 
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal 
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any 
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this 
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act 
notice that is available via the link in the footer of 
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Hall, Program Manager, FEMA, 
Grant Programs Directorate, (202) 786-9778. You may contact the Records 
Management Division for copies of the proposed collection of 
information at facsimile number (202) 646-3347 or email address: FEMA-Information-Collections-Management@dhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Port Security Grant Program (PSGP) is a 
DHS grant program that focuses on infrastructure protection activities. 
The PSGP is one tool in the comprehensive set of measures authorized by 
Congress and implemented by the Administration to strengthen the 
Nation's critical infrastructure against risks associated with 
potential terrorist attacks. The vast bulk of U.S. critical 
infrastructure is owned and/or operated by State, local and private 
sector partners. PSGP funds support increased port-wide risk 
management; enhanced domain awareness; training and exercises; and 
further capabilities to prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from 
attacks involving improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and other non-
conventional weapons. Section 102 of the Maritime Transportation 
Security Act of 2002, as amended (46 U.S.C. 70107), established the 
PSGP to provide for the establishment of a grant program for a risk-
based allocation of funds to implement Area Maritime Transportation 
Security Plans and facility security plans among port authorities, 
facility operators, and State and local government agencies required to 
provide port security services.

Collection of Information

    Title: FEMA Preparedness Grants: Port Security Grant Program 
(PSGP).
    OMB Number: 1660-0114.
    Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved 
information collection.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 089-5, PSGP Investment Justification.
    Abstract: The PSGP is an important tool among a comprehensive set 
of measures to help strengthen the Nation against risks associated with 
potential terrorist attacks. DHS/FEMA uses the information to evaluate 
applicants' familiarity with the national preparedness architecture and 
identify how elements of this architecture have been incorporated into 
regional/state/local planning, operations, and investments.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government; business or 
other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 370.
    Number of Responses: 1,112.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,414 hours.

State Table

                                                 Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                          Avg.        Total                     Total
                                                             Number of      Number of       Total      burden per     annual    Avg. hourly     annual
         Type of respondent            Form name/Form No.   respondents   responses per   number of     response   burden  (in  wage rate *   respondent
                                                                           respondent     responses    (in hours)     hours)                     cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local or Tribal Government..  PSGP Investment                 56               4          224           16        3,584       $52.91  $189,629.44
                                      Justification/FEMA
                                      Form 089-5.
State, Local or Tribal Government..  PSGP--Memorandum of              4               1            4            2            8        52.91       423.28
                                      Understanding (MOU)
                                      or Memorandum of
                                      Agreement (MOA).
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total..........................  .....................           60  ..............          228  ...........        3,592  ...........   190,052.72
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.

Local Table

                                                 Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Number of                    Avg.        Total                     Total
                                                                Number of    responses      Total      burden per     annual    Avg. hourly     annual
         Type of respondent              Form name/Form No.    respondents      per       number of     response   burden  (in  wage rate *   respondent
                                                                             respondent   responses    (in hours)     hours)                     cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local or Tribal Government...  PSGP Investment                  128            3          384           16        6,144       $52.91  $325,079.04
                                       Justification/FEMA
                                       Form 089-5.
State, Local or Tribal Government...  PSGP--Memorandum of               17            1           17            2           34        52.91     1,798.94
                                       Understanding (MOU) or
                                       Memorandum of
                                       Agreement (MOA).
                                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total...........................  .......................          145  ...........          401  ...........        6,178  ...........   326,877.98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.

Business or Other For-Profit Table

[[Page 31970]]



                                                 Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                          Avg.        Total                     Total
                                                             Number of      Number of       Total      burden per     annual    Avg. hourly     annual
         Type of respondent            Form name/Form No.   respondents   responses per   number of     response   burden  (in  wage rate *   respondent
                                                                           respondent     responses    (in hours)     hours)                     cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business or other for-profit.......  PSGP Investment                159               3          477           16        7,632       $52.91  $403,809.12
                                      Justification/FEMA
                                      Form 089-5.
Business or other for-profit.......  PSGP--Memorandum of              6               1            6            2           12        52.91       634.92
                                      Understanding (MOU)
                                      or Memorandum of
                                      Agreement (MOA).
                                                           ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total..........................  .....................          165  ..............          483  ...........        7,644  ...........   404,444.04
        Grand Total................  .....................          370  ..............        1,112  ...........       17,414  ...........   921,374.74
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: The ``Avg. Hourly Wage Rate'' for each respondent includes a 1.4 multiplier to reflect a fully-loaded wage rate.

    Estimated Cost: The estimated annual cost to respondents for the 
hour burden is $921,374.74. There are no annual costs to respondents 
operations and maintenance costs for technical services. There is no 
annual start-up or capital costs. The cost to the Federal Government is 
$897,447.60.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption 
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency, 
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) 
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden 
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or 
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: May 20, 2013.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2013-12580 Filed 5-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-19-P